There is controversy on the impact of traditional and artificial sweeteners on the healthy human lifestyle. This study aims to identify the pattern of postprandial blood glucose response after the intake of 3 different types of value-added coconut jaggery, followed by a glycemic index analysis (GI). The sap was collected with hal bark (Vateria capallifera) (HAL jaggery); the sap was collected through a new sap collection device followed by the addition of different spices of 0.2% cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) (CIN jaggery) and 0.05% nutmeg (Myristica fragrans)(NUT jaggery) used for the production of jaggery. The type of starch (digestible, resistant, and total) was evaluated using the in vitro digestion method stimulated with artificial gastric enzymes. The glucose concentration of postprandial blood was analyzed using an in vivo clinical study using human subjects who fasted for approximately 8 h as an initial assessment followed by an intake of a carbohydrate-containing sample (50 g). The resistant starch content of HAL jaggery (0.45 ± 0.05%) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the other 2 types. There was no significant effect of the addition of spices and the collecting method on digestible starch and total starch content of coconut jaggery. The glucose peak of the types of HAL jaggery (143.33 ± 12. 61 mg/dl), CIN jaggery (153.07 ± 15.25 mg/dl), and NUT jaggery (145.13 ± 22.39 mg/dl) types has shown a similar pattern. In vivo, glycemic testing of jaggery types has confirmed 3 types of jaggery as medium GI sweeteners with 55.79 ± 20.36, 57.56 ± 22.95, and 57.56 ± 22.95 for HAL, NUT, and CIN jaggery, respectively. The principal component analysis further confirmed the negative relationship between starch type and glycemic index of jaggery.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
