Pub Date : 2025-11-08DOI: 10.1007/s10439-025-03843-7
Jordy G M van Asten, Cecilia M Sahlgren, Jay D Humphrey, Tommaso Ristori, Sandra Loerakker
In situ vascular tissue engineering aims to create living blood vessel replacements from biodegradable scaffolds. The functionality of these tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) has often been limited, with substantial failure rate and outcome variability. Current optimization strategies seem unable to satisfy all requirements for functional TEVGs and the key sources of outcome variability remain unclear. Here, we computationally explored potential sources of TEVG variability and effects of manipulating Notch, a key vascular signaling pathway. We simulated the evolution of a TEVG from a degradable scaffold under varying patient-specific conditions, driven by immuno-mechano-mediated growth and remodeling mechanisms including Notch. Our simulations suggest that differential inflammatory production, scaffold degradation, and scaffold axial pre-stretch are major sources of variability in TEVG outcome. Immobilizing Jagged ligands to the scaffold did not substantially reduce outcome variability in our simulations, but did improve some aspects of TEVG functionality. This intervention may therefore be beneficial in combination with other treatments that compensate for predicted negative effects. Overall, our model may advance future TEVG optimization by incorporating Notch manipulations under various patient-specific conditions.
{"title":"Predicted Effects of Patient Variability and Notch Signaling on In Situ Vascular Tissue Engineering.","authors":"Jordy G M van Asten, Cecilia M Sahlgren, Jay D Humphrey, Tommaso Ristori, Sandra Loerakker","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03843-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03843-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In situ vascular tissue engineering aims to create living blood vessel replacements from biodegradable scaffolds. The functionality of these tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) has often been limited, with substantial failure rate and outcome variability. Current optimization strategies seem unable to satisfy all requirements for functional TEVGs and the key sources of outcome variability remain unclear. Here, we computationally explored potential sources of TEVG variability and effects of manipulating Notch, a key vascular signaling pathway. We simulated the evolution of a TEVG from a degradable scaffold under varying patient-specific conditions, driven by immuno-mechano-mediated growth and remodeling mechanisms including Notch. Our simulations suggest that differential inflammatory production, scaffold degradation, and scaffold axial pre-stretch are major sources of variability in TEVG outcome. Immobilizing Jagged ligands to the scaffold did not substantially reduce outcome variability in our simulations, but did improve some aspects of TEVG functionality. This intervention may therefore be beneficial in combination with other treatments that compensate for predicted negative effects. Overall, our model may advance future TEVG optimization by incorporating Notch manipulations under various patient-specific conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1007/s10439-025-03886-w
Bradley Fitzgerald, Thomas M Talavage
Purpose: Traditional use of the ComBat data harmonization method (a popular means of harmonizing multisite MRI data) is limited by the requirement that the harmonization must be recomputed with any addition of new subjects to the data pool. The goal of this study was to assess whether a transferable ComBat (T-ComBat) algorithm could be applied such that harmonization parameters computed using ComBat on a fixed set of diffusion tensor (DT) MRI training subject data could be reapplied to harmonize new, previously unseen subject data without alteration of the harmonized training data. Emphasis was given to evaluating the necessary size of such a training data pool.
Methods: Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) maps for 314 adolescents were harmonized across two MRI scanning sites using the T-ComBat method applied to new subject data for a variety of training group sizes. For each training group size, FA and MD maps were assessed for differences across sites after T-ComBat on voxel-wise and region-of-interest-wise (ROI) levels. Voxels and ROIs were tested for significant differences across sites.
Results: T-ComBat yielded improved harmonization across sites but did not reach the performance of full ComBat. A limited number of new subjects (approximately 25% for FA, 10% for MD) could be harmonized via T-ComBat and still yield a sufficiently harmonized total dataset.
Conclusion: T-ComBat may be applied to harmonize DT-MRI data from a limited number of new subjects from previously seen scanners without necessitating the reharmonization of previously analyzed data.
{"title":"Evaluating Transferability of ComBat Harmonization of Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.","authors":"Bradley Fitzgerald, Thomas M Talavage","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03886-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03886-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional use of the ComBat data harmonization method (a popular means of harmonizing multisite MRI data) is limited by the requirement that the harmonization must be recomputed with any addition of new subjects to the data pool. The goal of this study was to assess whether a transferable ComBat (T-ComBat) algorithm could be applied such that harmonization parameters computed using ComBat on a fixed set of diffusion tensor (DT) MRI training subject data could be reapplied to harmonize new, previously unseen subject data without alteration of the harmonized training data. Emphasis was given to evaluating the necessary size of such a training data pool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) maps for 314 adolescents were harmonized across two MRI scanning sites using the T-ComBat method applied to new subject data for a variety of training group sizes. For each training group size, FA and MD maps were assessed for differences across sites after T-ComBat on voxel-wise and region-of-interest-wise (ROI) levels. Voxels and ROIs were tested for significant differences across sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T-ComBat yielded improved harmonization across sites but did not reach the performance of full ComBat. A limited number of new subjects (approximately 25% for FA, 10% for MD) could be harmonized via T-ComBat and still yield a sufficiently harmonized total dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>T-ComBat may be applied to harmonize DT-MRI data from a limited number of new subjects from previously seen scanners without necessitating the reharmonization of previously analyzed data.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145470376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To determine the biomechanical properties of the central corneal region under intraocular pressure (IOP) and to develop an accurate method for predicting the corresponding responses.
Methods
In the rabbit corneal inflation test, a calculation method for the biomechanical properties in the thickness direction of the cornea was proposed. The corresponding stress–strain relationship was obtained from the change in the central corneal thickness and IOP. Finite element analysis (FEA) was utilized to predict the biomechanical responses of the central corneal region under IOP using the derived stress–strain relationship. The FEA predictions using the stress–strain relationships derived from the uniaxial tensile test and optical coherence elastography (OCE) were also conducted for comparison.
Results
The prediction accuracy of the FEA based on the inflation test was evaluated against OCE (in-plane), OCE (out-of-plane), and uniaxial tensile test. Compared to these methods, the maximum deviation of the apex displacement prediction based on the inflation test decreased by 73.2, 88.4, and 64.4%, respectively, and the maximum deviation of the central curvature prediction decreased by 89.2, 30.7, and 49.7%, respectively.
Conclusion
The stress–strain relationship in the thickness direction of the cornea can provide the most accurate prediction result of the corneal biomechanical responses under IOP. The inflation test-based method proposed can serve as an accurate tool for biomechanical characterization of the central corneal region.
{"title":"Biomechanical Characterization of Central Corneal Region Using Inflation Test and its Application to Predicting Central Corneal Response Under Intraocular Pressure","authors":"Zimeng Zhou, Honghao Wang, Ying Zhang, Haijun Lv, Zhuoyu Zhang, Huaming Li, Xiuli Liu, Tingwei Quan, Xiaohua Lv, Shaoqun Zeng","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03903-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10439-025-03903-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the biomechanical properties of the central corneal region under intraocular pressure (IOP) and to develop an accurate method for predicting the corresponding responses.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the rabbit corneal inflation test, a calculation method for the biomechanical properties in the thickness direction of the cornea was proposed. The corresponding stress–strain relationship was obtained from the change in the central corneal thickness and IOP. Finite element analysis (FEA) was utilized to predict the biomechanical responses of the central corneal region under IOP using the derived stress–strain relationship. The FEA predictions using the stress–strain relationships derived from the uniaxial tensile test and optical coherence elastography (OCE) were also conducted for comparison.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The prediction accuracy of the FEA based on the inflation test was evaluated against OCE (in-plane), OCE (out-of-plane), and uniaxial tensile test. Compared to these methods, the maximum deviation of the apex displacement prediction based on the inflation test decreased by 73.2, 88.4, and 64.4%, respectively, and the maximum deviation of the central curvature prediction decreased by 89.2, 30.7, and 49.7%, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The stress–strain relationship in the thickness direction of the cornea can provide the most accurate prediction result of the corneal biomechanical responses under IOP. The inflation test-based method proposed can serve as an accurate tool for biomechanical characterization of the central corneal region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"303 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145450219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To promote the adoption of exoskeletons in industries aiming to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders, it is essential to demonstrate their positive impact for specific tasks and users through practical evaluation methods. This study assessed four methods, each with a different level of detail, for modeling the support provided by a hinge-type back-support exoskeleton in OpenSim. Methods 1 and 2 simulated support as a pure torque applied at the hip joint, with Method 1 relying on user kinematics, and Method 2 using exoskeleton movement data to estimate the torque profile. Method 3 estimated supporting force vectors based on user kinematics and exoskeleton configuration, assuming the user’s body and the exoskeleton moved together. Method 4 incorporated the movement of the exoskeleton to simulate support as force vectors and was used as the reference for comparison. Results for back muscle activity and L5-S1 joint reaction forces were compared across the four modeling methods using data from fourteen participants performing squatting and stooping tasks with the exoskeleton. Statistical parameter mapping revealed significant differences in L5-S1 joint reaction forces between Methods 1 and 2 compared to Method 4 throughout the exoskeleton engagement period during squatting, and at the peak trunk angle during stooping. In contrast, minimal differences were observed between Method 3 and Method 4. These findings suggest that modeling exoskeleton support as force vectors based on user kinematics (Method 3) provides reasonable accuracy, demonstrating the feasibility of evaluating exoskeleton support with reduced data collection complexity and enabling an efficient assessment process.
{"title":"Musculoskeletal Modeling of a Hinge-Type Back-Support Exoskeleton: A Simplified Approach for Practical Assessment","authors":"Negar Riahi, Niromand Jasimi Zindashti, Ali Golabchi, Mahdi Tavakoli, Hossein Rouhani","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03888-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10439-025-03888-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To promote the adoption of exoskeletons in industries aiming to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders, it is essential to demonstrate their positive impact for specific tasks and users through practical evaluation methods. This study assessed four methods, each with a different level of detail, for modeling the support provided by a hinge-type back-support exoskeleton in OpenSim. Methods 1 and 2 simulated support as a pure torque applied at the hip joint, with Method 1 relying on user kinematics, and Method 2 using exoskeleton movement data to estimate the torque profile. Method 3 estimated supporting force vectors based on user kinematics and exoskeleton configuration, assuming the user’s body and the exoskeleton moved together. Method 4 incorporated the movement of the exoskeleton to simulate support as force vectors and was used as the reference for comparison. Results for back muscle activity and L5-S1 joint reaction forces were compared across the four modeling methods using data from fourteen participants performing squatting and stooping tasks with the exoskeleton. Statistical parameter mapping revealed significant differences in L5-S1 joint reaction forces between Methods 1 and 2 compared to Method 4 throughout the exoskeleton engagement period during squatting, and at the peak trunk angle during stooping. In contrast, minimal differences were observed between Method 3 and Method 4. These findings suggest that modeling exoskeleton support as force vectors based on user kinematics (Method 3) provides reasonable accuracy, demonstrating the feasibility of evaluating exoskeleton support with reduced data collection complexity and enabling an efficient assessment process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"195 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145450408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1007/s10439-025-03878-w
Shengping Zhong, Yi Zhang, Qimin Shi, Jeroen Van Dessel, Joris Geusens, Sam Coppieters, Bart Van Meerbeek, Constantinus Politis, Shoufeng Yang, Yi Sun
Patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plates (PSMRPs) have gained prominence for their precise adaptation to mandibular contours and reported enhanced mechanical performance compared to the manual-bent mandibular reconstruction plates (MBMRPs). However, clinical adoption remains cautious due to insufficient biomechanical evidence directly and carefully comparing their performance. Hence, this study investigated the biomechanical behavior between two mandibular reconstruction assemblies with MBMRP and PSMRP, respectively. Mechanical properties of these two reconstruction systems, including yield and ultimate strength, fatigue strength and life, were evaluated through finite element analyses (FEA) and biomechanical tests, during which digital image correlation (DIC) was used to measure full-field displacements and strains. Results revealed that the PSMRP provides higher stiffness and longer fatigue life to the reconstruction system than the MBMRP, signified by above 33% higher stiffness in the quasi-static compression and exceeding 90% more life cycles in the cyclic test, respectively. These findings not only highlight the biomechanical advantages of PSMRP over MBMRP but also underline the strong correlation between FEA predictions and experimental outcomes in the mandibular reconstruction system, validating the FEA’s utility for preoperative biomechanical evaluation. Collectively, this work provides critical evidence supporting the biomechanical superiority of PSMRPs in mandibular reconstruction—potentially reducing risks of plate failure and reoperation—and establishes a translational framework that combines computational and experimental biomechanics to advance patient-specific implant design in oral, dental, and craniofacial surgery.