Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery最新文献

The Pfannenstiel approach is an often used approach while treating pelvic ring injuries. Especially, symphyseal plating is performed using this approach. The original description is based for performing gynecological transverse caesarean section. While originally, a transverse dissection of the rectus abdominis muscles were favored, the presently used dissection and exposure is completely different to the classical symphyseal approach. A clear trend is observed, based on the experience of pelvic surgeons to the so-called supra-symphyseal crosscut approach according to Küstner using a longitudinal fascial incision. A transverse fascial incision of the rectus sheaths is usually not performed. Thus, the term Pfannenstiel approach should be replaced by “modified Pfannenstiel approach”.

Level of evidence V

Anterior approaches to the acetabulum can be distinguished into extrapelvic, intrapelvic and combined extrapelvic and intrapelvic approaches. Historically, the extrapelvic ilioinguinal approach was introduced in the French, English and German literature during the late 60s and became gradually the Gold-standard in treating anterior acetabular fractures. In the meantime, the intrapelvic approach, introduced by the Helsinki group, is favored by many surgeons with ongoing interest allowing direct antero-medial access to the true pelvis below the linea terminalis, to the quadrilateral plate and medial side of the posterior column. More recently, more supero-medial approaches, allowing access to the large and true pelvis have been developed, e.g. the Pararectus approach. The historical development, the value and approach-related results of the ilioinguinal approach are analyzed and discussed.

Acetabular fractures are prognostic relevant fractures in terms of function and daily activities. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is still the gold-standard in treating these injuries. Over recent years, several reports are dealing with outcome evaluations but have the main disadvantage of combining several fracture types., Thus, it remains unclear to discuss a fracture-based prognosis. This analysis evaluated fracture-type specific results in terms of clinical and radiological outcome. Analyzing elementary fracture types, pure transverse and isolated posterior column fractures are associated with relevant functional impairments. Except for posterior column fractures all other elementary fracture types were associated with degenerative changes in nearly 20%. Anterior column fractures seems to be “forgiving fractures” as they are associated with the longest median time until hip joint failure occurs. In associated fracture-types T-shaped fractures are still demanding fractures with < 60% anatomic reductions and a high rate of functional impairments. All associated fracture types are associated with a relevant rate of secondary degeneration of the hip joint between 20 and 40% of patients. Early hip joint failure (THR, Femoral head necrosis, severe heterotopic ossification) within the 1st year is frequently seen in associated posterior column and posterior wall fractures, but with a relative good prognosis, if the joint survived the first year after ORIF. The highest survival rates of the hip joint is observed with ABC-fractures. Also, these fractures seem to be “forgiving fractures”.

Femoral head fractures are rare, which limits the experience of individual surgeons with these injuries. This overview examines historical data, injury mechanisms, and classification systems, as well as epidemiological data from larger patient cohorts. Significant controversies persist regarding the optimal surgical approach and fracture-type-specific treatment for Pipkin fractures. The literature is often inconsistent, as many studies fail to differentiate between specific fracture types and instead report aggregated results, leading to ambiguous conclusions about the most effective treatment strategies. Thus, this article reviews fracture-type-specific outcomes of both non-operative and operative treatments over the past 25 years and summarizes their clinical implications, with the aim of assisting surgeons in their decision-making processes.

Purpose

Two stage revision arthroplasty remains the gold standard for peri-prosthetic joint infections of the knee. However, the functional outcomes of revision surgeries and the factors governing them require further investigation. The purpose of this study was to (a) evaluate impact of early and late stage I surgery and interval between stage I and stage II; (b) understand the impact of infecting organism and resistance; (c) to estimate long term survivorship and causes of failure.

Methods

A retrospective review of 86 patients, who underwent two stage revision for prosthetic joint infections of the knee, was performed. Time between onset of symptoms to stage I (T1), and T1 to re-implantation (T2), along with microbiological studies, were analysed for their impact on functional outcomes, failure modalities and survivorship.

Results

In this study, the mean KSS-Knee improved from 64.0 ± 10.0 pre-operatively to 76.9 ± 10.4, and 77.2 ± 10.1 at the 5 and 10 year follow up respectively. The KSS-Function improved from 44.4 ± 8.8 pre-operatively to 72.2 ± 9.5 and 79.8 ± 8.1 at 5 and 10 year follow-up respectively. This study also found that T1 and T2 remained critical factors in determining functional outcome and longevity of the implant and a delay in these intervals was a significant predictor of failure. Gram negative, poly-microbial infections and organisms with methicillin and vancomycin resistance demonstrated lower survivorship (p-value, 0.001 at 5, 10 and 12 years). Re-infections occurred in 4 cases while 9 cases failed due to aseptic causes.

Conclusion

Two-stage revision arthroplasty produced good functional outcomes when the infection was caused by single sensitive organism that did not exhibit high resistance to antibiotics. Stage I performed within 4 weeks and the subsequent re-implantation procedure undertaken within 6 weeks demonstrated better outcomes.

Posterior approaches, particularly the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, remain the workhorses in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Various modifications have been developed, each offering specific advantages depending on surgical requirements. The modified Gibson approach, for example, is suggested to provide enhanced visualization of the superior acetabulum, although recent cadaveric studies have not consistently substantiated this benefit. The Ganz approach, which involves bigastric trochanteric osteotomy with safe surgical hip dislocation, is particularly advantageous for managing complex and comminuted posterior acetabular fractures, as it enables a 360° view of the acetabulum and femoral head. Overall, posterior approaches are associated with low rates of complications, with heterotopic ossification being the most prevalent. The choice of surgical approach and patient positioning should be guided by the surgeon’s preference and expertise, tailored to the specific fracture pattern and patient characteristics.

Purpose

To systematically review the literature on the outcomes of above knee amputation as a salvage procedure after periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases were utilized to identify all studies evaluating clinical outcomes of patients with above knee amputation following PJI from inception to June 24, 2023. Studies were excluded for failure to report functional outcomes specifically related to AKA in PJI following TKA, utilizing surgical interventions other than amputation, AKA indicated for other reasons than PJI, technical studies, conference abstracts, case reports and non-English language. The quality of studies was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

Results

Seven retrospective studies, categorized as Therapeutic Level III evidence, were analyzed, involving a total of 188 patients who underwent AKA following PJI after TKA. The findings consistently indicate that post-AKA, patients experienced a notable decline in their level of independence and reported worsening ambulatory status. Infection and wound complications were common post-AKA, leading to revision surgeries, while the mortality rate ranged from 9 to 50% in the included studies. Polymicrobial organisms were frequently found in pre-AKA PJI, with MRSA being a common causative organism.

Conclusions

AKA due to PJI following TKA is associated with restricted mobility and high mortality rate. Polymicrobial infections and MRSA were identified as common infecting organisms, emphasizing the complexities and challenges associated with managing these infections. The reported functional outcomes, ambulatory status, complications, reoperations, and mortality rates highlight the importance of providing comprehensive, individualized care to these patients.

Background

Osteoporosis, age and frailty significantly impacts outcomes in fragility fractures of the pelvis, increasing morbidity and mortality. Identifying frailty aids in risk stratification and personalized care plans, enhancing recovery and reducing complications in older adults. Orthogeriatric co-management, an interdisciplinary approach combining orthopedics and geriatrics, optimizes care for older adults with fragility fractures. This model improves outcomes through integrated preoperative and postoperative care. This study examines the current literature for orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic ring or acetabular fractures, aiming to improve outcomes for older adults.

Conclusion

Orthogeriatric co-management can be an effective tool to significantly enhances clinical care and reduces complications in older adults with pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. Studies demonstrate increased detection of urological complications and earlier patient mobilisation, alongside a notable decrease in revision surgery rates. The implementation of a specialized framework underscores the necessity for standardised orthogeriatric protocols, optimizing patient outcomes and satisfaction. Integrating geriatric expertise in surgical treatment addresses comorbidities more effectively and minimizes postoperative complications. The certification of such centers ensures adherence to quality standards, fostering continuous improvement in care. Standardised orthogeriatric management should extend to all older fracture patients.

Introduction

Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) has been the mainstay of treatment for early onset periprosthetic joint infection in spite of variable results. Modular component exchange is a widely recommended strategy to improve success rates with DAIR though very strong evidence to support its practice is still lacking.

Materials and methods

Eighty six patients underwent DAIR for early onset PJI following primary hip and knee arthroplasty were divided into two groups for this retrospective review. 45 patients (group 1) underwent DAIR with modular component exchange and 41 patients without exchange (group 2). We compared success rates based on infection eradication (primary outcome variable) and need for revision surgical procedures between these two groups. We also assessed differences in primary outcome based on type of arthroplasty, timing of DAIR and addition of local antibiotics.

Results

The overall success rate after DAIR was 71%. The outcome was similar in both groups (69% vs 74%, P = 0.66). The need for revision surgical procedures was 27% which was similar in both groups (P = 0.98) with 23% needing revision of prosthetic components. Type of arthroplasty (hip or knee) and addition of local antibiotics had no bearing on infection eradication after DAIR with or without modular component exchange. DAIR with in 45 days of primary arthroplasty had significantly higher success rate compared to DAIR after 45 days in both groups.

Conclusions

We observed that modular component exchange did not improve infection eradication after DAIR for early onset PJI following hip and knee arthroplasty. Reasonable success rates can be expected after DAIR especially if the patient develops early clinical signs and the procedure is carried out as early as possible.

Combined injuries of the pelvic ring and the acetabulum are uncommon. Acute treatment should follow common protocols (ATLS e.g.) for pelvic ring injuries, although mechanical stabilization using pelvic binders or external fixators might be insufficient or even worsen the reduction in some combined fracture patterns. In case of mechanically connected acetabular and pelvic ring injury (MCAPI), surgical treatment might be demanding in lack of clear recommendations concerning the reduction and fixation sequence. A “pelvic ring first” sequence may be the best choice for most MCAPIs, starting with sacrum or SI-joint and symphysis pubis. An “acetabulum first” sequence should be considered in relatively stable posterior ring injuries and acetabulum fractures in younger patients, where a perfect anatomical reduction is feasible. Definitive surgical treatment should be performed as soon as possible depending on concomitant injuries, ideally within 3–7 days. Mechanical understanding of the combined fracture pattern and accurate planning are mandatory for surgical repair.