Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0
Drew Dalby, Alyssa M. Robison, Anthony Forrest, Steven Bennett, Ashni Patel, Jason Cholewa, Lindsey Rolston
Background
Indications for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become more inclusive of morbidly obese patients, however, higher rates of complications and lower implant survival have also been reported in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term survival, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of a cementless trabecular metal monoblock tibial component in severely obese patients.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of class II and III obese (BMI > 35) patients who received a cementless primary TKA. Standing radiographs were assessed for the presence of progressive tibial radiolucent lines (RLL), and clinical measures were assessed at least 2 years post-operative via the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity and Satisfaction Score, and the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health status.
Results
Patients (n = 176) were 61.2 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 44.9 ± 6.5 kg/m2, and were predominantly female (n = 118, 66.7%). Mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 17.1 months. There were two total revisions at 6- and 57-months post-operative, respectively, and the 5-year survival estimate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 99.6%). Patient satisfaction was 93.9% and the post-operative OKS, EQ-5D-5L index, and EQ-VAS were 40.2 ± 7.9, 0.856 ± 0.205, and 73.6 ± 14.7, respectively. No cases of radiolucent lines were detected.
Conclusions
At 6 years this cementless monoblock tibial component demonstrated excellent survival without radiographic indications of aseptic loosening in a population of severely obese patients.
{"title":"Mid-term radiographic evaluation of a monoblock trabecular metal tibia following total knee arthroplasty in obese and morbidly obese patients","authors":"Drew Dalby, Alyssa M. Robison, Anthony Forrest, Steven Bennett, Ashni Patel, Jason Cholewa, Lindsey Rolston","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Indications for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become more inclusive of morbidly obese patients, however, higher rates of complications and lower implant survival have also been reported in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term survival, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of a cementless trabecular metal monoblock tibial component in severely obese patients.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study of class II and III obese (BMI > 35) patients who received a cementless primary TKA. Standing radiographs were assessed for the presence of progressive tibial radiolucent lines (RLL), and clinical measures were assessed at least 2 years post-operative via the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity and Satisfaction Score, and the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health status.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients (n = 176) were 61.2 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 44.9 ± 6.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and were predominantly female (n = 118, 66.7%). Mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 17.1 months. There were two total revisions at 6- and 57-months post-operative, respectively, and the 5-year survival estimate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 99.6%). Patient satisfaction was 93.9% and the post-operative OKS, EQ-5D-5L index, and EQ-VAS were 40.2 ± 7.9, 0.856 ± 0.205, and 73.6 ± 14.7, respectively. No cases of radiolucent lines were detected.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>At 6 years this cementless monoblock tibial component demonstrated excellent survival without radiographic indications of aseptic loosening in a population of severely obese patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6
Anthony N. Baumann, Mathias A. Uhler, Jay Fiechter, Albert T. Anastasio, Kempland C. Walley, Atticus Coscia, Mark E. Hake
Objectives
Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making.
Methods
Data Sources: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients. Data Extraction: Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion. Data Synthesis: Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR).
Results
Five retrospective comparative studies (n = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (p = 0.696), EBL (p = 0.408), or LOS (p = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (p = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (p = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (p = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%).
Conclusion
Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size.
Level of evidence
Level IV.
{"title":"Nail-plate combination constructs versus single traditional constructs for distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies","authors":"Anthony N. Baumann, Mathias A. Uhler, Jay Fiechter, Albert T. Anastasio, Kempland C. Walley, Atticus Coscia, Mark E. Hake","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p><i>Data Sources</i>: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024. <i>Study Selection</i>: Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients. <i>Data Extraction</i>: Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion. <i>Data Synthesis</i>: Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Five retrospective comparative studies (<i>n</i> = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (<i>p</i> = 0.696), EBL (<i>p</i> = 0.408), or LOS (<i>p</i> = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (<i>p</i> = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (<i>p</i> = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05689-5
Qing-Yi Zhang, He-Xi Li, Hui-Qi Xie, Li-Min Liu, Li Chen, Yi Zeng
Purpose
The two-stage exchange revision represents a pivotal strategy in the management of prosthetic joint infections, wherein the judicious timing of reimplantation serves as a crucial determinant for therapeutic success. At present, attempts have been made to utilize predictive models to establish the optimal timing for reimplantation; however, their predictive accuracy remains unsatisfactory. This inadequacy primarily arises from the lack of dependable predictive indicators, which demonstrate inconsistent effectiveness across various studies and occasionally yield contradictory outcomes. Therefore, identifying solid predictive indicators is in desperate need.
Methods
Studies reporting outcomes of the two-stage exchange revision till June, 2023 were systematically retrieved, screened and subject to quality analysis. Basic characteristics of these studies were firstly summarized. Subsequently, factors of interest regarding clinical information, blood and body fluid test results, pathogen test results of the recurrent and recurrent-free cohorts were extracted and submitted to a fixed or random effects model. Meanwhile, evaluation of publication bias and sensitivity was performed.
Results
After filtering, a total of 45 studies were finally involved. Pooled analysis suggested that the recurrent cohort exhibited elevated incidences of body mass index (BMI) > 30, smoking and alcohol habits, diabetes, sinus tract, positive culture, and G−, polymicrobial and drug-resistant infections. Additionally, higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) were observed in the recurrent cohort. On the other hand, the results of D-dimer and fibrinogen were ambiguous, and no difference regarding peripheral WBC count was observed. Forest plots suggested a low risk of publication bias. Besides, sensitivity analysis indicated good stability of the aforementioned indicators, except D-dimer and fibrinogen.
Conclusion
To sum up, BMI > 30, smoking and alcohol habits, diabetes, sinus tract, positive culture, and G-, polymicrobial and drug-resistant infections, CRP, ESR, synovial WBC and PMN% exhibited significant differences between recurrent and recurrent-free cohorts. Therefore, these indicators may be considered as potential predictive factors for the further development of a prognostic model that aids the determination of reimplantation timing. Nevertheless, the efficacy of these indicators remains to be further confirmed.
Registration number
Prospero ID: CRD42022296568.
{"title":"Identifying potential predictive indicators for reimplantation timing in two-stage revision: a meta-analysis and system review","authors":"Qing-Yi Zhang, He-Xi Li, Hui-Qi Xie, Li-Min Liu, Li Chen, Yi Zeng","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05689-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05689-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The two-stage exchange revision represents a pivotal strategy in the management of prosthetic joint infections, wherein the judicious timing of reimplantation serves as a crucial determinant for therapeutic success. At present, attempts have been made to utilize predictive models to establish the optimal timing for reimplantation; however, their predictive accuracy remains unsatisfactory. This inadequacy primarily arises from the lack of dependable predictive indicators, which demonstrate inconsistent effectiveness across various studies and occasionally yield contradictory outcomes. Therefore, identifying solid predictive indicators is in desperate need.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Studies reporting outcomes of the two-stage exchange revision till June, 2023 were systematically retrieved, screened and subject to quality analysis. Basic characteristics of these studies were firstly summarized. Subsequently, factors of interest regarding clinical information, blood and body fluid test results, pathogen test results of the recurrent and recurrent-free cohorts were extracted and submitted to a fixed or random effects model. Meanwhile, evaluation of publication bias and sensitivity was performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>After filtering, a total of 45 studies were finally involved. Pooled analysis suggested that the recurrent cohort exhibited elevated incidences of body mass index (BMI) > 30, smoking and alcohol habits, diabetes, sinus tract, positive culture, and G<sup>−</sup>, polymicrobial and drug-resistant infections. Additionally, higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) were observed in the recurrent cohort. On the other hand, the results of D-dimer and fibrinogen were ambiguous, and no difference regarding peripheral WBC count was observed. Forest plots suggested a low risk of publication bias. Besides, sensitivity analysis indicated good stability of the aforementioned indicators, except D-dimer and fibrinogen.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To sum up, BMI > 30, smoking and alcohol habits, diabetes, sinus tract, positive culture, and G-, polymicrobial and drug-resistant infections, CRP, ESR, synovial WBC and PMN% exhibited significant differences between recurrent and recurrent-free cohorts. Therefore, these indicators may be considered as potential predictive factors for the further development of a prognostic model that aids the determination of reimplantation timing. Nevertheless, the efficacy of these indicators remains to be further confirmed.</p><h3>Registration number</h3><p>Prospero ID: CRD42022296568.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1
Umer Butt, Filip Vuletic, M Ali Ahmed Shaikh, Amanullah, Ghufran ur Rehman, Imran Ali Shah, Anders Stålman, Zainab Aqeel Khan
Aims
This study presents clinical outcomes, functional results, and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadruple hamstring tendon autograft or peroneus longus tendon autograft in a randomized controlled trial.
Patients and methods
Between February 2018 and July 2019, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly assigned to two groups: hamstring and peroneus longus. Patient related outcome measurements and pain intensity were evaluated using IKDC, Lysholm, and visual analog scores at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after the surgery. At the 5 year follow-up, anterior stability was tested using the 3D printable Knee Arthrometer. In addition, in the peroneus longus group, ankle functional assessment was performed using the American foot and ankle score. Additionally, data on the return to sports/activities was collected for both groups at the last follow-up.
Results
Sixty patients, with 30 in the hamstring group and 30 in the peroneus group, were included in the study. Patients were predominately male and with low activity demands. After five years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional assessment scores (IKDC and Lysholm) between the two groups (P n.s). The median graft diameter was 7.9 ± 0.4 mm in the hamstring tendon group and 8.9 ± 0.2 mm in the PL group (P < 0.001). The improvement in Arthrometer testing measurements (AMT) for the operated knees in the hamstring and peroneus longus groups were similar. In the peroneus longus group, the mean postoperative foot and ankle score was 98.6 ± 3.9 (range = 85–100).
Conclusion
Using Peroneus longus tendon autograft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a feasible alternative as studied in this cohort of predominately male patients with low activity demands. The graft diameter in this study was sufficient, and the results regarding laxity and patient related outcome measurements were similar to those achieved with hamstring tendon autografts.
Level of evidence
Level I
Trial registration
ChiCTR2000036989
{"title":"5-years outcomes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing quadruple hamstring and peroneus longus tendon autografts: a randomized control trial","authors":"Umer Butt, Filip Vuletic, M Ali Ahmed Shaikh, Amanullah, Ghufran ur Rehman, Imran Ali Shah, Anders Stålman, Zainab Aqeel Khan","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study presents clinical outcomes, functional results, and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadruple hamstring tendon autograft or peroneus longus tendon autograft in a randomized controlled trial.</p><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Between February 2018 and July 2019, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly assigned to two groups: hamstring and peroneus longus. Patient related outcome measurements and pain intensity were evaluated using IKDC, Lysholm, and visual analog scores at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after the surgery. At the 5 year follow-up, anterior stability was tested using the 3D printable Knee Arthrometer. In addition, in the peroneus longus group, ankle functional assessment was performed using the American foot and ankle score. Additionally, data on the return to sports/activities was collected for both groups at the last follow-up.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty patients, with 30 in the hamstring group and 30 in the peroneus group, were included in the study. Patients were predominately male and with low activity demands. After five years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional assessment scores (IKDC and Lysholm) between the two groups (P <i>n.s</i>). The median graft diameter was 7.9 ± 0.4 mm in the hamstring tendon group and 8.9 ± 0.2 mm in the PL group (P < 0.001). The improvement in Arthrometer testing measurements (AMT) for the operated knees in the hamstring and peroneus longus groups were similar. In the peroneus longus group, the mean postoperative foot and ankle score was 98.6 ± 3.9 (range = 85–100).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using Peroneus longus tendon autograft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a feasible alternative as studied in this cohort of predominately male patients with low activity demands. The graft diameter in this study was sufficient, and the results regarding laxity and patient related outcome measurements were similar to those achieved with hamstring tendon autografts.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level I</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ChiCTR2000036989</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05675-x
John T. Riehl, Noah J. Embry, Daniel G. Zeter, Cornelis J. Potgieter, McKenna W. Box
Introduction
Low rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been found in patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee. Many surgeons routinely provide chemical thromboprophylaxis in these injuries, however. This is not without inherent risks, and this remains a controversial topic in perioperative care in orthopaedic trauma. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to look at rates of VTE in patients with isolated orthopaedic fractures below the knee, grouped by whether they received chemical prophylaxis versus no chemical prophylaxis.
Methods
A systematic review was performed comparing VTE with and without chemical thromboprophylaxis following isolated orthopaedic fracture below the knee. A chi-square analysis was then performed on data including patients who received chemical prophylaxis versus those who did not from all 25 included articles. The articles were grouped according to type of study, such as observational versus randomized controlled trial (RCT), and then further subdivided according to surgical intervention status, and whether routine screening for thromboembolism was utilized to diagnose. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I criteria for cohort studies and the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials. A random effects pooled logistic regression and Fisher’s exact tests were then performed.
Results
222,188 patients were found from 25 articles. Chemical prophylaxis was given to 8,666 patients, and VTE was reported in 347 cases (4.0%). 213,522 patients did not receive chemical prophylaxis, and VTE was reported in 2,185 (1.02%) (χ2 (1, n = 222,188) = 656.8, p < .00001). Pooled logistic regression revealed that patients receiving prophylaxis were 0.5 times less likely to develop VTE. With a calculated population baseline risk of 1.5% for developing VTE, the number needed to treat (NNT) with chemical prophylaxis is 134 to prevent 1 VTE after fracture below the knee.
Conclusions
In patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee, indiscriminate use of chemical VTE prophylaxis is not recommended due to the lack of significant benefit and high NNT.
Level of Evidence
Level III.
{"title":"Incidence of venous thromboembolism in fracture below the knee with and without chemical thromboprophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"John T. Riehl, Noah J. Embry, Daniel G. Zeter, Cornelis J. Potgieter, McKenna W. Box","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05675-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05675-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Low rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been found in patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee. Many surgeons routinely provide chemical thromboprophylaxis in these injuries, however. This is not without inherent risks, and this remains a controversial topic in perioperative care in orthopaedic trauma. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to look at rates of VTE in patients with isolated orthopaedic fractures below the knee, grouped by whether they received chemical prophylaxis versus no chemical prophylaxis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed comparing VTE with and without chemical thromboprophylaxis following isolated orthopaedic fracture below the knee. A chi-square analysis was then performed on data including patients who received chemical prophylaxis versus those who did not from all 25 included articles. The articles were grouped according to type of study, such as observational versus randomized controlled trial (RCT), and then further subdivided according to surgical intervention status, and whether routine screening for thromboembolism was utilized to diagnose. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I criteria for cohort studies and the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials. A random effects pooled logistic regression and Fisher’s exact tests were then performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>222,188 patients were found from 25 articles. Chemical prophylaxis was given to 8,666 patients, and VTE was reported in 347 cases (4.0%). 213,522 patients did not receive chemical prophylaxis, and VTE was reported in 2,185 (1.02%) (χ<sup>2</sup> (1, n = 222,188) = 656.8, p < .00001). Pooled logistic regression revealed that patients receiving prophylaxis were 0.5 times less likely to develop VTE. With a calculated population baseline risk of 1.5% for developing VTE, the number needed to treat (NNT) with chemical prophylaxis is 134 to prevent 1 VTE after fracture below the knee.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee, indiscriminate use of chemical VTE prophylaxis is not recommended due to the lack of significant benefit and high NNT.</p><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05728-1
L. Keppler, F. Navarre, A. M. Keppler, C. Ihle, J. Becker, J. Fürmetz, T. Saier
Aim
The aim of this study was to investigate on fulfillment of expectations and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of complex proximal tibial fractures.
Methods
In this prospective study 114 patients who suffered a complex tibial fracture (AO/OTA-Type B and C) were enrolled. At follow-up, based on the Hospital For Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSES), an individualized questionnaire was used to evaluate whether the preoperative formulated expectations had been fulfilled. In addition, condition of the knee joint (rated 0–4), overall satisfaction (rated 0–4) with the outcome, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and SF-12 was used.
Results
Fulfillment of expectations for abilty to run, to knee, and regain an intact status of the knee joint performed worst in the HFSS-KSE. Highest fulfillment was reached for psychological well-being and to interact socially. No statistical difference was found between the two fracture groups (AO/OTA-Type B vs. C). In the study cohort n = 81 patients (83.5%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome. Mean satisfaction in the study cohort was 3.5. Satisfaction correlated highly significant with all items of the HFSS-KSE survey. Results vary in the different fracture groups. Satisfaction also correlates highly significant with the condition of the knee joint as well as with all dimensions of the KOOS score and the PCS of the SF-12 survey.
Conclusion
In patients who suffered a complex proximal tibial fracture, fulfillment of preoperative expectations is only limited. Nevertheless, overall satisfaction with the outcome is high, and correlates to a high degree with fulfillment of joint functionality and current health status. The fracture type does not influence these results.
{"title":"Fulfillment of expectations and patient satisfaction following surgical treatment of complex proximal tibial fractures","authors":"L. Keppler, F. Navarre, A. M. Keppler, C. Ihle, J. Becker, J. Fürmetz, T. Saier","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05728-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05728-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate on fulfillment of expectations and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of complex proximal tibial fractures.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this prospective study 114 patients who suffered a complex tibial fracture (AO/OTA-Type B and C) were enrolled. At follow-up, based on the Hospital For Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSES), an individualized questionnaire was used to evaluate whether the preoperative formulated expectations had been fulfilled. In addition, condition of the knee joint (rated 0–4), overall satisfaction (rated 0–4) with the outcome, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and SF-12 was used.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Fulfillment of expectations for abilty to run, to knee, and regain an intact status of the knee joint performed worst in the HFSS-KSE. Highest fulfillment was reached for psychological well-being and to interact socially. No statistical difference was found between the two fracture groups (AO/OTA-Type B vs. C). In the study cohort n = 81 patients (83.5%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome. Mean satisfaction in the study cohort was 3.5. Satisfaction correlated highly significant with all items of the HFSS-KSE survey. Results vary in the different fracture groups. Satisfaction also correlates highly significant with the condition of the knee joint as well as with all dimensions of the KOOS score and the PCS of the SF-12 survey.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients who suffered a complex proximal tibial fracture, fulfillment of preoperative expectations is only limited. Nevertheless, overall satisfaction with the outcome is high, and correlates to a high degree with fulfillment of joint functionality and current health status. The fracture type does not influence these results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-21DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05732-5
Michael D. Dubé, Ahmed K. Emara, Matthew E. Deren, Ignacio Pasqualini, Pedro J. Rullan, Joshua Tidd, Nicolas S. Piuzzi
Core decompression was developed as a joint-preserving procedure for patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Previous studies indicated a high success rate that outperforms nonoperative management of pre-collapse hips. The traditional single-tunnel core decompression technique uses a cannulated drill bit inserted into the lateral cortex of the proximal femur. Multiple small drilling was introduced to decrease the risk of fracture through a less invasive technique. Adjunctive therapeutics such as tantalum rods, bone-grafting, orthobiologic (e,g, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, mesenchymal stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell extracts) as well as electric stimulation have all been studied. No consensus regarding the ideal treatment has been reached. This review analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of current core decompression techniques to provide orthopaedic surgeons with direction in managing patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
{"title":"Techniques of core decompression in the treatment of idiopathic avascular necrosis of the femoral head","authors":"Michael D. Dubé, Ahmed K. Emara, Matthew E. Deren, Ignacio Pasqualini, Pedro J. Rullan, Joshua Tidd, Nicolas S. Piuzzi","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05732-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05732-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Core decompression was developed as a joint-preserving procedure for patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Previous studies indicated a high success rate that outperforms nonoperative management of pre-collapse hips. The traditional single-tunnel core decompression technique uses a cannulated drill bit inserted into the lateral cortex of the proximal femur. Multiple small drilling was introduced to decrease the risk of fracture through a less invasive technique. Adjunctive therapeutics such as tantalum rods, bone-grafting, orthobiologic (e,g, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, mesenchymal stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell extracts) as well as electric stimulation have all been studied. No consensus regarding the ideal treatment has been reached. This review analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of current core decompression techniques to provide orthopaedic surgeons with direction in managing patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142870364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-21DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05713-8
Maximilian Budin, T. David Luo, Christian Lausmann, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak
Introduction
A sinus tract, an abnormal channel between the skin and joint, is a major criterion that proves the presence of an underlying periprosthetic joint infection. Its presence not only increases failure rates but also leads to poor outcomes. Despite its clinical relevance, little is known about risk factors and underlying microorganism profiles. The aim of this study was to investigate PJIs of the hip with a sinus tract, identifying risk factors and microorganism profiles.
Materials and methods
This was a retrospective case control study of all PJI cases of the hip treated at our institution. A total of 4,368 cases with a PJI of the hip were identified of which 653 patients (14.95%), displayed a sinus tract. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were presented.
Results
Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (p = 0.004; OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.17–2.44), history of ileus (p < 0.001; OR = 4.65; 95% CI 2.38–9.08), osteomyelitis (p < 0.001; OR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.65–3.35) and prior revisions (p = 0–014; OR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.07–1.74) as risk factors for a sinus tract. Polymicrobial infections (p < 0.001; OR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.86–2.96), Staphylococcus aureus (p < 0.001; OR = 3.67; 95% CI 2.86–4.71) and Escherichia coli (p = 0.014; OR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.11–2.46) were associated with a sinus tract in PJIs of the hip.
Conclusions
Microorganism profiles and risk factors differ significantly in patients with PJI of a THA with a sinus tract. These insights can help surgeons in planning and selecting appropriate antibiotics for cement loading and empiric antibiotic treatment, as well as in risk stratification of patients, who may develop a sinus tract following THA.
{"title":"What are the risk factors and microorganism profiles of periprosthetic hip joint infections with a concomitant sinus tract?","authors":"Maximilian Budin, T. David Luo, Christian Lausmann, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05713-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05713-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A sinus tract, an abnormal channel between the skin and joint, is a major criterion that proves the presence of an underlying periprosthetic joint infection. Its presence not only increases failure rates but also leads to poor outcomes. Despite its clinical relevance, little is known about risk factors and underlying microorganism profiles. The aim of this study was to investigate PJIs of the hip with a sinus tract, identifying risk factors and microorganism profiles.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective case control study of all PJI cases of the hip treated at our institution. A total of 4,368 cases with a PJI of the hip were identified of which 653 patients (14.95%), displayed a sinus tract. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were presented.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (<i>p</i> = 0.004; OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.17–2.44), history of ileus (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 4.65; 95% CI 2.38–9.08), osteomyelitis (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.65–3.35) and prior revisions (<i>p</i> = 0–014; OR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.07–1.74) as risk factors for a sinus tract. Polymicrobial infections (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.86–2.96), <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 3.67; 95% CI 2.86–4.71) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.014; OR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.11–2.46) were associated with a sinus tract in PJIs of the hip.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Microorganism profiles and risk factors differ significantly in patients with PJI of a THA with a sinus tract. These insights can help surgeons in planning and selecting appropriate antibiotics for cement loading and empiric antibiotic treatment, as well as in risk stratification of patients, who may develop a sinus tract following THA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142870396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Perioperative steroids administration in total joint arthroplasty gained popularity for pain relief, reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and enhanced recovery. The purpose of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyze comparative results of prospective randomized trials focused on the effect of systemic steroid administration at different dosages in THA for hip osteoarthritis. The hypothesis is that perioperative systemic steroid administration has a positive impact on postoperative outcomes.
Material and methods
A systematic review of the literature has been performed, following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for study selection. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Science Citation Index Expanded from Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and LILACS) covering the period from 1990 to 2023. Placebo-controlled, prospective randomized trials that reported comparative outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of systemic corticosteroids during the perioperative period were considered eligible for inclusion.
Results
A total of 8 prospective randomized trials involving 675 patients who underwent elective THA (369 in the study group and 306 in the control group) were finally included in this systematic review. Perioperative systemic steroid administration in THA provides a significant benefit in terms of length of stay (LOS), pain, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and inflammatory response without improving post-operative complications. The high-dose steroid administration (≥ 20 mg of steroid equivalent) provided only a reduction of the inflammatory response of measured biomarkers at 24 and 48 h.
Conclusions
The use of steroids in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has positive effects in terms of reducing length of stay (LOS), post operative pain, opioid use, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and systemic inflammatory response.
{"title":"Effect of systemic steroids administration in the clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials","authors":"Mattia Alessio-Mazzola, Giulia D’Andrea, Assala Abu-Mukh, Salvatore Mosca, Giacomo Placella, Vincenzo Salini","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05626-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05626-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Perioperative steroids administration in total joint arthroplasty gained popularity for pain relief, reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and enhanced recovery. The purpose of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyze comparative results of prospective randomized trials focused on the effect of systemic steroid administration at different dosages in THA for hip osteoarthritis. The hypothesis is that perioperative systemic steroid administration has a positive impact on postoperative outcomes.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A systematic review of the literature has been performed, following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for study selection. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Science Citation Index Expanded from Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and LILACS) covering the period from 1990 to 2023. Placebo-controlled, prospective randomized trials that reported comparative outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of systemic corticosteroids during the perioperative period were considered eligible for inclusion.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 8 prospective randomized trials involving 675 patients who underwent elective THA (369 in the study group and 306 in the control group) were finally included in this systematic review. Perioperative systemic steroid administration in THA provides a significant benefit in terms of length of stay (LOS), pain, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and inflammatory response without improving post-operative complications. The high-dose steroid administration (≥ 20 mg of steroid equivalent) provided only a reduction of the inflammatory response of measured biomarkers at 24 and 48 h.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of steroids in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has positive effects in terms of reducing length of stay (LOS), post operative pain, opioid use, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and systemic inflammatory response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142870349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-21DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4
Jan Gewiess, Christoph Emanuel Albers, Marius Johann Baptist Keel, Frede Frihagen, Pol Maria Rommens, Johannes Dominik Bastian
Fragility and insufficiency fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and sacrum (SIF) are increasingly prevalent, particularly among the elderly, due to weakened bone structure and low-energy trauma. Chronic instability from these fractures causes persistent pain, limited mobility, and significant reductions in quality of life. Hospitalization is often required, with substantial risks of loss of independence (64–89%) and high mortality rates (13–27%). While conservative treatment is possible, surgical intervention is preferred for unstable or progressive fractures. FFP and SIF are primarily associated with osteoporosis, with 71% of patients not receiving adequate secondary fracture prevention. Imaging modalities play a crucial role in diagnosis. Conventional radiography often misses sacral fractures, while computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for evaluating fracture morphology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the highest sensitivity (99%), essential for detecting complex fractures and assessing bone edema. Advanced techniques like dual-energy CT and SPECT/CT provide further diagnostic value. Rommens and Hofmann’s classification system categorizes FFP based on anterior and posterior pelvic ring involvement, guiding treatment strategies. Progression from stable fractures (FFP I–II) to highly unstable patterns (FFP IV) is common and influenced by factors like pelvic morphology, bone density, and sarcopenia. Treatment varies based on fracture type and stability. Non-displaced posterior fractures can be managed with sacroplasty or screw fixation, while displaced or unstable patterns often require more invasive methods, such as triangular lumbopelvic fixation or transsacral bar osteosynthesis. Sacroplasty provides significant pain relief but has limited stabilizing capacity, while screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate improves fixation in osteoporotic bones. Anterior ring fractures may be treated with retrograde transpubic screws or symphyseal plating, with biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes depending on fixation techniques. FFP and SIF management requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure stability, pain relief, and functional recovery, emphasizing early diagnosis, tailored surgical strategies, and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures.
{"title":"Chronic pelvic insufficiency fractures and their treatment","authors":"Jan Gewiess, Christoph Emanuel Albers, Marius Johann Baptist Keel, Frede Frihagen, Pol Maria Rommens, Johannes Dominik Bastian","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fragility and insufficiency fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and sacrum (SIF) are increasingly prevalent, particularly among the elderly, due to weakened bone structure and low-energy trauma. Chronic instability from these fractures causes persistent pain, limited mobility, and significant reductions in quality of life. Hospitalization is often required, with substantial risks of loss of independence (64–89%) and high mortality rates (13–27%). While conservative treatment is possible, surgical intervention is preferred for unstable or progressive fractures. FFP and SIF are primarily associated with osteoporosis, with 71% of patients not receiving adequate secondary fracture prevention. Imaging modalities play a crucial role in diagnosis. Conventional radiography often misses sacral fractures, while computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for evaluating fracture morphology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the highest sensitivity (99%), essential for detecting complex fractures and assessing bone edema. Advanced techniques like dual-energy CT and SPECT/CT provide further diagnostic value. Rommens and Hofmann’s classification system categorizes FFP based on anterior and posterior pelvic ring involvement, guiding treatment strategies. Progression from stable fractures (FFP I–II) to highly unstable patterns (FFP IV) is common and influenced by factors like pelvic morphology, bone density, and sarcopenia. Treatment varies based on fracture type and stability. Non-displaced posterior fractures can be managed with sacroplasty or screw fixation, while displaced or unstable patterns often require more invasive methods, such as triangular lumbopelvic fixation or transsacral bar osteosynthesis. Sacroplasty provides significant pain relief but has limited stabilizing capacity, while screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate improves fixation in osteoporotic bones. Anterior ring fractures may be treated with retrograde transpubic screws or symphyseal plating, with biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes depending on fixation techniques. FFP and SIF management requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure stability, pain relief, and functional recovery, emphasizing early diagnosis, tailored surgical strategies, and secondary prevention of osteoporotic\u0000fractures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142870394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}