Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6
Ryan St. John, Seth Spicer, Mo Hadaya, Hanna Brancaccio, Seungkyu Park, Sean McMillan
Objective
The primary research aim was to determine if the use of traditional or 3D printed prosthesis resulted in better functional outcome scores in hip arthroplasty.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, WebOfScience, and Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched yielding 1117 article titles and abstracts. Rayyan.ai was used to detect duplicates (n = 246) and for manual screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included were controlled studies of any publication time that assessed Harris Hip Score (HHS) at baseline and twelve months. Six papers were sought for full text review of which three studies totaling 195 hips met final inclusion.
Results
Mean HHS in the control group went from 38.15 (± 6.02) at baseline to 80.30 (± 4.79) at twelve months follow-up, while the 3D group saw a change from 37.81 (± 5.84) to 90.60 (± 4.49). Significant and large improvements between time points were seen within the control group [p = .02, Cohen’s d = 8.57 (1.48, 15.56)] and 3D group [p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 9.18 (3.50, 14.86)]. The HHS score of the 3D group improved by 10.64 points more than the HHS score of the control group, which is a statistically insignificant (p = 0.89) amount.
Conclusion
Group differences in pooled mean HHS scores at twelve months follow-up surpassed established minimum differences for clinical importance. High quality research should be further pursued to elucidate these findings.
{"title":"Comparing functional outcomes between 3D printed acetabular cups and traditional prosthetic implants in hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta analysis","authors":"Ryan St. John, Seth Spicer, Mo Hadaya, Hanna Brancaccio, Seungkyu Park, Sean McMillan","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The primary research aim was to determine if the use of traditional or 3D printed prosthesis resulted in better functional outcome scores in hip arthroplasty.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, WebOfScience, and Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched yielding 1117 article titles and abstracts. Rayyan.ai was used to detect duplicates (n = 246) and for manual screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included were controlled studies of any publication time that assessed Harris Hip Score (HHS) at baseline and twelve months. Six papers were sought for full text review of which three studies totaling 195 hips met final inclusion.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean HHS in the control group went from 38.15 (± 6.02) at baseline to 80.30 (± 4.79) at twelve months follow-up, while the 3D group saw a change from 37.81 (± 5.84) to 90.60 (± 4.49). Significant and large improvements between time points were seen within the control group [p = .02, Cohen’s d = 8.57 (1.48, 15.56)] and 3D group [p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 9.18 (3.50, 14.86)]. The HHS score of the 3D group improved by 10.64 points more than the HHS score of the control group, which is a statistically insignificant (p = 0.89) amount.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Group differences in pooled mean HHS scores at twelve months follow-up surpassed established minimum differences for clinical importance. High quality research should be further pursued to elucidate these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05734-3
Luca Marega, Pietro Gnagni, Carlo Marega, Filippo Marega
Purpose
The main objective of this prospective study was to assess clinical, radiographic and safety mid-term outcomes after THA with a short cemented stem in an elderly patient cohort. Moreover, the study aimed at investigating the mid-term survivorship of the implant and the incidence of complications.
Methods
96 consecutive patients (100 cases) underwent THA with a short cemented stem. Underlying pathology was primary coxarthrosis in 93% of the cases. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HSS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the radiographic evaluations were performed preoperatively, and at 45 days, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months postoperatively.
Results
Patients’ mean age at the time of surgery was of 73.4 years (range: 67.2–79.6 years). Mean HHS and OHS registered a significant improvement already 45 days after surgery, with the HHS increasing from 35.9 ± 11.3 (preoperative) to 79.2 ± 8.8 (45 days post-operatively) and the OHS increasing from 10.9 ± 4.8 (preoperative) to 34.1 ± 7.5 at 45 days (p < 0.001). Mean HHS and OHS at 5 years post operatively reached 97.2 ± 5.8 and 47.4 ± 1.4 points respectively. All implants were stable at the final follow-up with no cases of progressive radiolucent lines or osteolysis. No revisions were performed, with a survivorship of 100% at 5 years.
Conclusion
According to excellent clinical and patient-subjective outcomes and to the good implant stability with no component failure up to 5 years, this study suggests that the analysed short cemented stem could be a safe and performing treatment option for THA in elderly population.
{"title":"Mid-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty with a cemented short stem in an elderly patient cohort","authors":"Luca Marega, Pietro Gnagni, Carlo Marega, Filippo Marega","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05734-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05734-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The main objective of this prospective study was to assess clinical, radiographic and safety mid-term outcomes after THA with a short cemented stem in an elderly patient cohort. Moreover, the study aimed at investigating the mid-term survivorship of the implant and the incidence of complications.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>96 consecutive patients (100 cases) underwent THA with a short cemented stem. Underlying pathology was primary coxarthrosis in 93% of the cases. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HSS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the radiographic evaluations were performed preoperatively, and at 45 days, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months postoperatively.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients’ mean age at the time of surgery was of 73.4 years (range: 67.2–79.6 years). Mean HHS and OHS registered a significant improvement already 45 days after surgery, with the HHS increasing from 35.9 ± 11.3 (preoperative) to 79.2 ± 8.8 (45 days post-operatively) and the OHS increasing from 10.9 ± 4.8 (preoperative) to 34.1 ± 7.5 at 45 days (p < 0.001). Mean HHS and OHS at 5 years post operatively reached 97.2 ± 5.8 and 47.4 ± 1.4 points respectively. All implants were stable at the final follow-up with no cases of progressive radiolucent lines or osteolysis. No revisions were performed, with a survivorship of 100% at 5 years.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to excellent clinical and patient-subjective outcomes and to the good implant stability with no component failure up to 5 years, this study suggests that the analysed short cemented stem could be a safe and performing treatment option for THA in elderly population.</p><p><i>Level of Evidence</i>: III.</p><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier</h3><p>NCT04987437</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1
Julia Elisabeth Lenz, Lorenz Huber, Dominik Szymski, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp, Johannes Weber
Introduction
Patellar fractures are rare at 1% incidence of all fractures. However, they can cause significant functional impairments due to the patella’s role in knee joint extension. Current scoring systems lack objectivity in assessing patellar healing. This study aims to validate the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) using biplanar radiographs for assessing surgically treated patellar fractures.
Materials and methods
A retrospective analysis of radiological follow-up examinations was conducted on patients undergoing surgical treatment for patellar fractures from January 1st 2013, to June 30th 2023. Thirty patients were randomly selected, yielding 105 postoperative X-rays representing various healing stages. The modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) was applied to these X-rays by three independent trauma surgeons. Radiological follow-up examinations were randomized, pseudonymized, and stored on a hospital server for blinded assessment by three raters. The modified RUST assessed continuity of patellar borders and cortexes, assigning scores based on cortical bridging. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), adhering to recommended sample size criteria and interpretation guidelines.
Results
The mean modified RUST was 9.1 ± 2.2 points, with scores ranging from 4 to 12 points. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.92) and the intraobserver ICC were 0.6 (95% CI, 0.65–0.84), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71–0.87) and 0.98 (0.98–0.99) respectively, which indicated good to excellent agreement.
Conclusions
This study validated the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) for evaluating bone healing in patellar fractures treated with osteosynthesis, demonstrating good intra- and interobserver reliability. The modified RUST can provide a standardized method for assessing healing in patellar fractures, benefiting both clinical practice and clinical trials.
{"title":"A modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) scoring system for patella fractures treated with osteosynthesis shows excellent intra und interobserver reliability","authors":"Julia Elisabeth Lenz, Lorenz Huber, Dominik Szymski, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp, Johannes Weber","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patellar fractures are rare at 1% incidence of all fractures. However, they can cause significant functional impairments due to the patella’s role in knee joint extension. Current scoring systems lack objectivity in assessing patellar healing. This study aims to validate the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) using biplanar radiographs for assessing surgically treated patellar fractures.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of radiological follow-up examinations was conducted on patients undergoing surgical treatment for patellar fractures from January 1st 2013, to June 30th 2023. Thirty patients were randomly selected, yielding 105 postoperative X-rays representing various healing stages. The modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) was applied to these X-rays by three independent trauma surgeons. Radiological follow-up examinations were randomized, pseudonymized, and stored on a hospital server for blinded assessment by three raters. The modified RUST assessed continuity of patellar borders and cortexes, assigning scores based on cortical bridging. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), adhering to recommended sample size criteria and interpretation guidelines.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean modified RUST was 9.1 ± 2.2 points, with scores ranging from 4 to 12 points. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.92) and the intraobserver ICC were 0.6 (95% CI, 0.65–0.84), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71–0.87) and 0.98 (0.98–0.99) respectively, which indicated good to excellent agreement.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study validated the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) for evaluating bone healing in patellar fractures treated with osteosynthesis, demonstrating good intra- and interobserver reliability. The modified RUST can provide a standardized method for assessing healing in patellar fractures, benefiting both clinical practice and clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05730-7
Yuhu Zhao, Xin Liu, Huaqiang Tao, Xiaolong Liang, Kai Zheng, Jun Zhou, Dechun Geng, Yaozeng Xu
Purpose
Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively less common than medial UKA. There has been no comparative analysis of the constitutional phenotypes of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Furthermore, the study analyzed whether CPAK phenotypes were maintained or altered after medial or lateral UKA.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent UKA. A radiological analysis was conducted using an EOS imaging system, and demographic data of patients undergoing UKA were collected. Performed measurements included the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), lateral distal femur angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), which were analyzed both before and after UKA. The CPAK classification was used to classify knee alignment phenotypes.
Results
A total of 310 knees of 244 patients were included in the study that underwent non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing UKA (279 medial; 31 lateral). Preoperatively, the most common categories for knees were Type I (varus mechanical axis, 53.8%) in medial UKA and Type III (valgus alignment, 77.4%) in lateral UKA. Postoperatively, Type II (neutral mechanical axis) became the most common type for both groups, accounting for 34.1% in the medial UKA group and 25.8% in the lateral UKA group. Only 31.3% preserved their preoperative CPAK classification after the surgery (32.3% and 22.6%, respectively).
Conclusion
The CPAK classification differs significantly between knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. While 31.3% of knees maintained their native knee phenotype, there is a tendency towards a neutrally aligned classification after surgery for both medial and lateral UKA. The CPAK classification optimizes preoperative categorization and may assist surgeons in tailoring personalized therapies to improve clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Distinct knee phenotype variation: a comparative analysis of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty","authors":"Yuhu Zhao, Xin Liu, Huaqiang Tao, Xiaolong Liang, Kai Zheng, Jun Zhou, Dechun Geng, Yaozeng Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05730-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05730-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively less common than medial UKA. There has been no comparative analysis of the constitutional phenotypes of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Furthermore, the study analyzed whether CPAK phenotypes were maintained or altered after medial or lateral UKA.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent UKA. A radiological analysis was conducted using an EOS imaging system, and demographic data of patients undergoing UKA were collected. Performed measurements included the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), lateral distal femur angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), which were analyzed both before and after UKA. The CPAK classification was used to classify knee alignment phenotypes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 310 knees of 244 patients were included in the study that underwent non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing UKA (279 medial; 31 lateral). Preoperatively, the most common categories for knees were Type I (varus mechanical axis, 53.8%) in medial UKA and Type III (valgus alignment, 77.4%) in lateral UKA. Postoperatively, Type II (neutral mechanical axis) became the most common type for both groups, accounting for 34.1% in the medial UKA group and 25.8% in the lateral UKA group. Only 31.3% preserved their preoperative CPAK classification after the surgery (32.3% and 22.6%, respectively).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CPAK classification differs significantly between knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. While 31.3% of knees maintained their native knee phenotype, there is a tendency towards a neutrally aligned classification after surgery for both medial and lateral UKA. The CPAK classification optimizes preoperative categorization and may assist surgeons in tailoring personalized therapies to improve clinical outcomes.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05690-y
Michelle M. J. Jacobs, Karin Veerman, Jon H. M. Goosen
Introduction
Recent studies have increasingly provided evidence that one-stage septic revisions for hip and knee are a safe treatment option for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in selected patients. However, there is still a wide treatment variation concerning indications and execution among different practices. This study aimed to describe these differences.
Methods
We set out an online questionnaire among members of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) in September 2023. The questionnaire consisted of questions investigating indications, execution, and preferences regarding one-stage hip and knee septic revisions. Descriptive analysis was performed of all results and Chi-squared tests were used to test for differences in opinions between subgroups of respondents.
Results
Sixty-five orthopaedic revision arthroplasty surgeons completed the questionnaire. 68% prefer to standardly perform two-stage revisions and only do one-stage revisions in selected patients. However, there was no consensus on which (contra-)indications should be used to select these patients. The most important reason to not perform one-stage revisions was fear of a higher reinfection risk, partly due to inconclusive literature. There was also no consensus on which perioperative antimicrobial measures should be applied.
Conclusions
Notable differences in indications for and execution of one-stage septic revisions persist. We encourage others to share their experiences with this procedure. Moreover, clinical trials should be undertaken to provide stronger evidence for the safety of one-stage septic revisions and to provide clear and uniform guidelines.
{"title":"Variations in clinical practice of one-stage septic revisions in chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections: an international questionnaire study","authors":"Michelle M. J. Jacobs, Karin Veerman, Jon H. M. Goosen","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05690-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05690-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Recent studies have increasingly provided evidence that one-stage septic revisions for hip and knee are a safe treatment option for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in selected patients. However, there is still a wide treatment variation concerning indications and execution among different practices. This study aimed to describe these differences.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We set out an online questionnaire among members of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) in September 2023. The questionnaire consisted of questions investigating indications, execution, and preferences regarding one-stage hip and knee septic revisions. Descriptive analysis was performed of all results and Chi-squared tests were used to test for differences in opinions between subgroups of respondents.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five orthopaedic revision arthroplasty surgeons completed the questionnaire. 68% prefer to standardly perform two-stage revisions and only do one-stage revisions in selected patients. However, there was no consensus on which (contra-)indications should be used to select these patients. The most important reason to not perform one-stage revisions was fear of a higher reinfection risk, partly due to inconclusive literature. There was also no consensus on which perioperative antimicrobial measures should be applied.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Notable differences in indications for and execution of one-stage septic revisions persist. We encourage others to share their experiences with this procedure. Moreover, clinical trials should be undertaken to provide stronger evidence for the safety of one-stage septic revisions and to provide clear and uniform guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142880499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9
Antonio Klasan, Cedric Donati, Riccardo Compagnoni, Alberto Grassi, Volker Musahl, Jacques Menetrey
Purpose
The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient’s subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.
Methods
A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: ”How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?” Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.
Results
After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (p = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (p < 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (p < 0.001), but with a model fitness of r2 = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.
Conclusion
IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients’ subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.
{"title":"A simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question can be used for a quick assessment of patients undergoing knee surgery","authors":"Antonio Klasan, Cedric Donati, Riccardo Compagnoni, Alberto Grassi, Volker Musahl, Jacques Menetrey","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient’s subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: ”How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?” Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (<i>p</i> = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but with a model fitness of r<sup>2</sup> = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients’ subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142880393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05612-y
Young Hwan Park, Sei Wook Son, Sung Jin Ahn, Hee Soh Yoo, Hak Jun Kim
Introduction
Although sesamoid-preserving procedures have been attempted to complement sesamoidectomy for hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion, few reports document the results. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients with hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion who underwent screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting.
Materials and methods
Medical records of patients who underwent surgery between January 2013 and September 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed using the foot function index (FFI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Fracture union was assessed using plain radiographs and computed tomography scans.
Results
Ten patients (4 males and 6 females) were enrolled. The mean age was 39.4 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.0), and the mean follow-up duration was 23.4 months (SD, 14.5). The FFI score improved from 72.3 (SD, 8.7) preoperatively to 8.2 (SD, 10.7) 12 months postoperatively and to 6.6 (SD, 8.3) at the final follow-up (p < 0.01, respectively). The VAS score improved from 67.8 (SD, 13.5) preoperatively to 2.2 (SD, 3.8) 12 months postoperatively, finally improving to 3.6 (SD, 4.8) at the final follow-up (p < 0.01, respectively). Union was achieved in all patients 3 months postoperatively. Although no complications were observed, hardware removal was performed in two patients owing to discomfort and psychological anxiety.
Conclusion
Given that the symptoms improved in all patients without complications, as observed in this study, screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting appears to be a viable option for treating hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion.
{"title":"Postoperative outcome of screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting for the management of hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion","authors":"Young Hwan Park, Sei Wook Son, Sung Jin Ahn, Hee Soh Yoo, Hak Jun Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05612-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05612-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although sesamoid-preserving procedures have been attempted to complement sesamoidectomy for hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion, few reports document the results. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients with hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion who underwent screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Medical records of patients who underwent surgery between January 2013 and September 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed using the foot function index (FFI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Fracture union was assessed using plain radiographs and computed tomography scans.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten patients (4 males and 6 females) were enrolled. The mean age was 39.4 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.0), and the mean follow-up duration was 23.4 months (SD, 14.5). The FFI score improved from 72.3 (SD, 8.7) preoperatively to 8.2 (SD, 10.7) 12 months postoperatively and to 6.6 (SD, 8.3) at the final follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively). The VAS score improved from 67.8 (SD, 13.5) preoperatively to 2.2 (SD, 3.8) 12 months postoperatively, finally improving to 3.6 (SD, 4.8) at the final follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively). Union was achieved in all patients 3 months postoperatively. Although no complications were observed, hardware removal was performed in two patients owing to discomfort and psychological anxiety.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Given that the symptoms improved in all patients without complications, as observed in this study, screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting appears to be a viable option for treating hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142880545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0
Drew Dalby, Alyssa M. Robison, Anthony Forrest, Steven Bennett, Ashni Patel, Jason Cholewa, Lindsey Rolston
Background
Indications for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become more inclusive of morbidly obese patients, however, higher rates of complications and lower implant survival have also been reported in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term survival, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of a cementless trabecular metal monoblock tibial component in severely obese patients.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of class II and III obese (BMI > 35) patients who received a cementless primary TKA. Standing radiographs were assessed for the presence of progressive tibial radiolucent lines (RLL), and clinical measures were assessed at least 2 years post-operative via the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity and Satisfaction Score, and the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health status.
Results
Patients (n = 176) were 61.2 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 44.9 ± 6.5 kg/m2, and were predominantly female (n = 118, 66.7%). Mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 17.1 months. There were two total revisions at 6- and 57-months post-operative, respectively, and the 5-year survival estimate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 99.6%). Patient satisfaction was 93.9% and the post-operative OKS, EQ-5D-5L index, and EQ-VAS were 40.2 ± 7.9, 0.856 ± 0.205, and 73.6 ± 14.7, respectively. No cases of radiolucent lines were detected.
Conclusions
At 6 years this cementless monoblock tibial component demonstrated excellent survival without radiographic indications of aseptic loosening in a population of severely obese patients.
{"title":"Mid-term radiographic evaluation of a monoblock trabecular metal tibia following total knee arthroplasty in obese and morbidly obese patients","authors":"Drew Dalby, Alyssa M. Robison, Anthony Forrest, Steven Bennett, Ashni Patel, Jason Cholewa, Lindsey Rolston","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Indications for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become more inclusive of morbidly obese patients, however, higher rates of complications and lower implant survival have also been reported in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term survival, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of a cementless trabecular metal monoblock tibial component in severely obese patients.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study of class II and III obese (BMI > 35) patients who received a cementless primary TKA. Standing radiographs were assessed for the presence of progressive tibial radiolucent lines (RLL), and clinical measures were assessed at least 2 years post-operative via the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity and Satisfaction Score, and the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health status.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients (n = 176) were 61.2 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 44.9 ± 6.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and were predominantly female (n = 118, 66.7%). Mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 17.1 months. There were two total revisions at 6- and 57-months post-operative, respectively, and the 5-year survival estimate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 99.6%). Patient satisfaction was 93.9% and the post-operative OKS, EQ-5D-5L index, and EQ-VAS were 40.2 ± 7.9, 0.856 ± 0.205, and 73.6 ± 14.7, respectively. No cases of radiolucent lines were detected.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>At 6 years this cementless monoblock tibial component demonstrated excellent survival without radiographic indications of aseptic loosening in a population of severely obese patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6
Anthony N. Baumann, Mathias A. Uhler, Jay Fiechter, Albert T. Anastasio, Kempland C. Walley, Atticus Coscia, Mark E. Hake
Objectives
Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making.
Methods
Data Sources: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients. Data Extraction: Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion. Data Synthesis: Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR).
Results
Five retrospective comparative studies (n = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (p = 0.696), EBL (p = 0.408), or LOS (p = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (p = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (p = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (p = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%).
Conclusion
Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size.
{"title":"Nail-plate combination constructs versus single traditional constructs for distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies","authors":"Anthony N. Baumann, Mathias A. Uhler, Jay Fiechter, Albert T. Anastasio, Kempland C. Walley, Atticus Coscia, Mark E. Hake","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p><i>Data Sources</i>: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024. <i>Study Selection</i>: Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients. <i>Data Extraction</i>: Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion. <i>Data Synthesis</i>: Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Five retrospective comparative studies (<i>n</i> = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (<i>p</i> = 0.696), EBL (<i>p</i> = 0.408), or LOS (<i>p</i> = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (<i>p</i> = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (<i>p</i> = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1
Umer Butt, Filip Vuletic, M Ali Ahmed Shaikh, Amanullah, Ghufran ur Rehman, Imran Ali Shah, Anders Stålman, Zainab Aqeel Khan
Aims
This study presents clinical outcomes, functional results, and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadruple hamstring tendon autograft or peroneus longus tendon autograft in a randomized controlled trial.
Patients and methods
Between February 2018 and July 2019, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly assigned to two groups: hamstring and peroneus longus. Patient related outcome measurements and pain intensity were evaluated using IKDC, Lysholm, and visual analog scores at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after the surgery. At the 5 year follow-up, anterior stability was tested using the 3D printable Knee Arthrometer. In addition, in the peroneus longus group, ankle functional assessment was performed using the American foot and ankle score. Additionally, data on the return to sports/activities was collected for both groups at the last follow-up.
Results
Sixty patients, with 30 in the hamstring group and 30 in the peroneus group, were included in the study. Patients were predominately male and with low activity demands. After five years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional assessment scores (IKDC and Lysholm) between the two groups (P n.s). The median graft diameter was 7.9 ± 0.4 mm in the hamstring tendon group and 8.9 ± 0.2 mm in the PL group (P < 0.001). The improvement in Arthrometer testing measurements (AMT) for the operated knees in the hamstring and peroneus longus groups were similar. In the peroneus longus group, the mean postoperative foot and ankle score was 98.6 ± 3.9 (range = 85–100).
Conclusion
Using Peroneus longus tendon autograft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a feasible alternative as studied in this cohort of predominately male patients with low activity demands. The graft diameter in this study was sufficient, and the results regarding laxity and patient related outcome measurements were similar to those achieved with hamstring tendon autografts.
Level of evidence
Level I
Trial registration
ChiCTR2000036989
目的:本研究在一项随机对照试验中介绍了使用自体四股腘绳肌腱或自体腓骨长肌腱重建前交叉韧带(ACL)后的临床结果、功能结果和恢复运动的情况。患者和方法2018年2月至2019年7月期间,接受ACL重建的患者随机分为腘绳肌和腓骨长肌两组。在术后3个月、6个月、1年、2年和5年,使用IKDC、Lysholm和视觉模拟评分评估患者相关的结果测量和疼痛强度。在5年的随访中,使用3D打印膝关节计测试前路稳定性。此外,在腓骨长肌组,使用美式足和踝关节评分进行踝关节功能评估。此外,在最后一次随访中收集了两组患者重返体育/活动的数据。结果共纳入60例患者,其中腘绳肌组30例,腓骨肌组30例。患者以男性为主,活动量低。随访5年后,两组功能评估评分(IKDC和Lysholm)无显著差异(P . n.s)。腘绳肌腱组中位直径为7.9±0.4 mm, PL组中位直径为8.9±0.2 mm (P < 0.001)。腘绳肌组和腓骨长肌组术后膝关节关节计测试测量(AMT)的改善相似。腓骨长肌组术后足踝关节平均评分为98.6±3.9(范围= 85-100)。结论自体腓骨长肌腱移植用于关节镜下前交叉韧带重建是一种可行的替代方法,该研究主要针对低活动需求的男性患者。本研究中移植物直径是足够的,关于松弛度和患者相关结果测量的结果与腘绳肌腱自体移植物相似。证据水平试验注册:chictr2000036989
{"title":"5-years outcomes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing quadruple hamstring and peroneus longus tendon autografts: a randomized control trial","authors":"Umer Butt, Filip Vuletic, M Ali Ahmed Shaikh, Amanullah, Ghufran ur Rehman, Imran Ali Shah, Anders Stålman, Zainab Aqeel Khan","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study presents clinical outcomes, functional results, and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadruple hamstring tendon autograft or peroneus longus tendon autograft in a randomized controlled trial.</p><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Between February 2018 and July 2019, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly assigned to two groups: hamstring and peroneus longus. Patient related outcome measurements and pain intensity were evaluated using IKDC, Lysholm, and visual analog scores at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after the surgery. At the 5 year follow-up, anterior stability was tested using the 3D printable Knee Arthrometer. In addition, in the peroneus longus group, ankle functional assessment was performed using the American foot and ankle score. Additionally, data on the return to sports/activities was collected for both groups at the last follow-up.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty patients, with 30 in the hamstring group and 30 in the peroneus group, were included in the study. Patients were predominately male and with low activity demands. After five years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional assessment scores (IKDC and Lysholm) between the two groups (P <i>n.s</i>). The median graft diameter was 7.9 ± 0.4 mm in the hamstring tendon group and 8.9 ± 0.2 mm in the PL group (P < 0.001). The improvement in Arthrometer testing measurements (AMT) for the operated knees in the hamstring and peroneus longus groups were similar. In the peroneus longus group, the mean postoperative foot and ankle score was 98.6 ± 3.9 (range = 85–100).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using Peroneus longus tendon autograft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a feasible alternative as studied in this cohort of predominately male patients with low activity demands. The graft diameter in this study was sufficient, and the results regarding laxity and patient related outcome measurements were similar to those achieved with hamstring tendon autografts.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level I</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ChiCTR2000036989</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}