首页 > 最新文献

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Comparing functional outcomes between 3D printed acetabular cups and traditional prosthetic implants in hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta analysis 比较3D打印髋臼杯和传统人工髋关节置换术的功能结果:系统回顾和meta分析
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6
Ryan St. John, Seth Spicer, Mo Hadaya, Hanna Brancaccio, Seungkyu Park, Sean McMillan

Objective

The primary research aim was to determine if the use of traditional or 3D printed prosthesis resulted in better functional outcome scores in hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, WebOfScience, and Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched yielding 1117 article titles and abstracts. Rayyan.ai was used to detect duplicates (n = 246) and for manual screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included were controlled studies of any publication time that assessed Harris Hip Score (HHS) at baseline and twelve months. Six papers were sought for full text review of which three studies totaling 195 hips met final inclusion.

Results

Mean HHS in the control group went from 38.15 (± 6.02) at baseline to 80.30 (± 4.79) at twelve months follow-up, while the 3D group saw a change from 37.81 (± 5.84) to 90.60 (± 4.49). Significant and large improvements between time points were seen within the control group [p = .02, Cohen’s d = 8.57 (1.48, 15.56)] and 3D group [p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 9.18 (3.50, 14.86)]. The HHS score of the 3D group improved by 10.64 points more than the HHS score of the control group, which is a statistically insignificant (p = 0.89) amount.

Conclusion

Group differences in pooled mean HHS scores at twelve months follow-up surpassed established minimum differences for clinical importance. High quality research should be further pursued to elucidate these findings.

目的主要研究目的是确定在髋关节置换术中使用传统假体或3D打印假体是否会产生更好的功能结果评分。方法采用PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了六个数据库(PubMed, Embase, Scopus, WebOfScience, Cochrane Library, b谷歌Scholar),得到1117篇文章标题和摘要。Rayyan。Ai用于检测重复(n = 246),并用于人工筛选纳入和排除标准。纳入了在基线和12个月时评估哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS)的任何出版时间的对照研究。6篇论文被寻求全文审查,其中3项研究共计195髋符合最终纳入。结果对照组平均HHS从基线时的38.15(±6.02)上升到随访12个月时的80.30(±4.79),3D组从37.81(±5.84)上升到90.60(±4.49)。对照组患者在不同时间点间的显著改善[p =]。02年,科恩的d = 8.57(1.48, 15.56)]和3 d组(p & lt; 0.01,科恩的d = 9.18(3.50, 14.86)]。3D组HHS评分较对照组提高10.64分,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.89)。结论随访12个月时HHS综合平均评分的组间差异超过了临床重要性的最小差异。应该进一步进行高质量的研究来阐明这些发现。
{"title":"Comparing functional outcomes between 3D printed acetabular cups and traditional prosthetic implants in hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta analysis","authors":"Ryan St. John,&nbsp;Seth Spicer,&nbsp;Mo Hadaya,&nbsp;Hanna Brancaccio,&nbsp;Seungkyu Park,&nbsp;Sean McMillan","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The primary research aim was to determine if the use of traditional or 3D printed prosthesis resulted in better functional outcome scores in hip arthroplasty.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, WebOfScience, and Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched yielding 1117 article titles and abstracts. Rayyan.ai was used to detect duplicates (n = 246) and for manual screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included were controlled studies of any publication time that assessed Harris Hip Score (HHS) at baseline and twelve months. Six papers were sought for full text review of which three studies totaling 195 hips met final inclusion.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean HHS in the control group went from 38.15 (± 6.02) at baseline to 80.30 (± 4.79) at twelve months follow-up, while the 3D group saw a change from 37.81 (± 5.84) to 90.60 (± 4.49). Significant and large improvements between time points were seen within the control group [p = .02, Cohen’s d = 8.57 (1.48, 15.56)] and 3D group [p &lt; 0.01, Cohen’s d = 9.18 (3.50, 14.86)]. The HHS score of the 3D group improved by 10.64 points more than the HHS score of the control group, which is a statistically insignificant (p = 0.89) amount.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Group differences in pooled mean HHS scores at twelve months follow-up surpassed established minimum differences for clinical importance. High quality research should be further pursued to elucidate these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05650-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mid-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty with a cemented short stem in an elderly patient cohort 一期全髋关节置换术与骨水泥短柄后的中期结果
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05734-3
Luca Marega, Pietro Gnagni, Carlo Marega, Filippo Marega

Purpose

The main objective of this prospective study was to assess clinical, radiographic and safety mid-term outcomes after THA with a short cemented stem in an elderly patient cohort. Moreover, the study aimed at investigating the mid-term survivorship of the implant and the incidence of complications.

Methods

96 consecutive patients (100 cases) underwent THA with a short cemented stem. Underlying pathology was primary coxarthrosis in 93% of the cases. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HSS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the radiographic evaluations were performed preoperatively, and at 45 days, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months postoperatively.

Results

Patients’ mean age at the time of surgery was of 73.4 years (range: 67.2–79.6 years). Mean HHS and OHS registered a significant improvement already 45 days after surgery, with the HHS increasing from 35.9 ± 11.3 (preoperative) to 79.2 ± 8.8 (45 days post-operatively) and the OHS increasing from 10.9 ± 4.8 (preoperative) to 34.1 ± 7.5 at 45 days (p < 0.001). Mean HHS and OHS at 5 years post operatively reached 97.2 ± 5.8 and 47.4 ± 1.4 points respectively. All implants were stable at the final follow-up with no cases of progressive radiolucent lines or osteolysis. No revisions were performed, with a survivorship of 100% at 5 years.

Conclusion

According to excellent clinical and patient-subjective outcomes and to the good implant stability with no component failure up to 5 years, this study suggests that the analysed short cemented stem could be a safe and performing treatment option for THA in elderly population.

Level of Evidence: III.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT04987437

目的:本前瞻性研究的主要目的是评估老年患者队列中短骨水泥椎体置换术后的临床、影像学和中期安全性结果。此外,该研究旨在调查种植体的中期生存和并发症的发生率。方法连续96例患者(100例)行短骨水泥干THA。93%的病例的基础病理为原发性关节关节病。采用Harris髋关节评分(HSS)和Oxford髋关节评分(OHS)进行临床评估,并于术前、术后45天、6、12、24和60个月进行影像学评估。结果患者手术时平均年龄73.4岁(范围:67.2 ~ 79.6岁)。平均HHS和OHS在术后45天就有明显改善,HHS从术前的35.9±11.3上升到术后45天的79.2±8.8,OHS从术前的10.9±4.8上升到术后45天的34.1±7.5 (p < 0.001)。术后5年平均HHS为97.2±5.8分,OHS为47.4±1.4分。在最后的随访中,所有的植入物都是稳定的,没有进展性放射线或骨溶解的病例。未进行任何修订,5年生存率为100%。结论根据良好的临床和患者主观结果,以及良好的种植体稳定性,无组件失效长达5年,本研究表明所分析的短骨水泥柄可能是老年人THA的一种安全有效的治疗选择。证据等级:III.ClinicalTrials.gov鉴定号nct04987437
{"title":"Mid-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty with a cemented short stem in an elderly patient cohort","authors":"Luca Marega,&nbsp;Pietro Gnagni,&nbsp;Carlo Marega,&nbsp;Filippo Marega","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05734-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05734-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The main objective of this prospective study was to assess clinical, radiographic and safety mid-term outcomes after THA with a short cemented stem in an elderly patient cohort. Moreover, the study aimed at investigating the mid-term survivorship of the implant and the incidence of complications.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>96 consecutive patients (100 cases) underwent THA with a short cemented stem. Underlying pathology was primary coxarthrosis in 93% of the cases. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HSS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the radiographic evaluations were performed preoperatively, and at 45 days, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months postoperatively.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients’ mean age at the time of surgery was of 73.4 years (range: 67.2–79.6 years). Mean HHS and OHS registered a significant improvement already 45 days after surgery, with the HHS increasing from 35.9 ± 11.3 (preoperative) to 79.2 ± 8.8 (45 days post-operatively) and the OHS increasing from 10.9 ± 4.8 (preoperative) to 34.1 ± 7.5 at 45 days (p &lt; 0.001). Mean HHS and OHS at 5 years post operatively reached 97.2 ± 5.8 and 47.4 ± 1.4 points respectively. All implants were stable at the final follow-up with no cases of progressive radiolucent lines or osteolysis. No revisions were performed, with a survivorship of 100% at 5 years.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to excellent clinical and patient-subjective outcomes and to the good implant stability with no component failure up to 5 years, this study suggests that the analysed short cemented stem could be a safe and performing treatment option for THA in elderly population.</p><p><i>Level of Evidence</i>: III.</p><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier</h3><p>NCT04987437</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) scoring system for patella fractures treated with osteosynthesis shows excellent intra und interobserver reliability 改良的胫骨放射联合评分(RUST)评分系统对髌骨骨折植骨治疗显示了良好的内部和观察者之间的可靠性
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1
Julia Elisabeth Lenz, Lorenz Huber, Dominik Szymski, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp, Johannes Weber

Introduction

Patellar fractures are rare at 1% incidence of all fractures. However, they can cause significant functional impairments due to the patella’s role in knee joint extension. Current scoring systems lack objectivity in assessing patellar healing. This study aims to validate the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) using biplanar radiographs for assessing surgically treated patellar fractures.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of radiological follow-up examinations was conducted on patients undergoing surgical treatment for patellar fractures from January 1st 2013, to June 30th 2023. Thirty patients were randomly selected, yielding 105 postoperative X-rays representing various healing stages. The modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) was applied to these X-rays by three independent trauma surgeons. Radiological follow-up examinations were randomized, pseudonymized, and stored on a hospital server for blinded assessment by three raters. The modified RUST assessed continuity of patellar borders and cortexes, assigning scores based on cortical bridging. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), adhering to recommended sample size criteria and interpretation guidelines.

Results

The mean modified RUST was 9.1 ± 2.2 points, with scores ranging from 4 to 12 points. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.92) and the intraobserver ICC were 0.6 (95% CI, 0.65–0.84), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71–0.87) and 0.98 (0.98–0.99) respectively, which indicated good to excellent agreement.

Conclusions

This study validated the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) for evaluating bone healing in patellar fractures treated with osteosynthesis, demonstrating good intra- and interobserver reliability. The modified RUST can provide a standardized method for assessing healing in patellar fractures, benefiting both clinical practice and clinical trials.

髌骨骨折在所有骨折中发生率仅为1%。然而,由于髌骨在膝关节伸展中的作用,它们会导致显著的功能损伤。目前的评分系统在评估髌骨愈合方面缺乏客观性。本研究旨在利用双平面x线片验证胫骨放射联合评分(RUST)用于评估手术治疗的髌骨骨折。材料与方法回顾性分析2013年1月1日至2023年6月30日接受手术治疗的髌骨骨折患者的放射学随访检查。随机选择30例患者,获得105张术后x光片,代表不同的愈合阶段。改良的胫骨放射联合评分(RUST)由三位独立的创伤外科医生应用于这些x线片。放射随访检查随机化,假名化,并存储在医院服务器上,由三名评分者进行盲法评估。改良的RUST评估髌骨边界和皮质的连续性,根据皮质桥接评分。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间和观察者内的信度,遵循推荐的样本量标准和解释指南。结果改良RUST平均为9.1±2.2分,评分范围为4 ~ 12分。观察者间类内相关系数(ICC)为0.88 (95% CI, 0.81-0.92),观察者内相关系数(ICC)分别为0.6 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84)、0.80 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87)和0.98(0.98 - 0.99),表明一致性良好至极好。结论:本研究验证了胫骨放射联合评分(RUST)用于评估髌骨骨折骨愈合的效果,显示出良好的内部和观察者之间的可靠性。改良后的RUST可以为评估髌骨骨折愈合提供标准化的方法,有利于临床实践和临床试验。
{"title":"A modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) scoring system for patella fractures treated with osteosynthesis shows excellent intra und interobserver reliability","authors":"Julia Elisabeth Lenz,&nbsp;Lorenz Huber,&nbsp;Dominik Szymski,&nbsp;Volker Alt,&nbsp;Markus Rupp,&nbsp;Johannes Weber","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patellar fractures are rare at 1% incidence of all fractures. However, they can cause significant functional impairments due to the patella’s role in knee joint extension. Current scoring systems lack objectivity in assessing patellar healing. This study aims to validate the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) using biplanar radiographs for assessing surgically treated patellar fractures.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of radiological follow-up examinations was conducted on patients undergoing surgical treatment for patellar fractures from January 1st 2013, to June 30th 2023. Thirty patients were randomly selected, yielding 105 postoperative X-rays representing various healing stages. The modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) was applied to these X-rays by three independent trauma surgeons. Radiological follow-up examinations were randomized, pseudonymized, and stored on a hospital server for blinded assessment by three raters. The modified RUST assessed continuity of patellar borders and cortexes, assigning scores based on cortical bridging. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), adhering to recommended sample size criteria and interpretation guidelines.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean modified RUST was 9.1 ± 2.2 points, with scores ranging from 4 to 12 points. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.92) and the intraobserver ICC were 0.6 (95% CI, 0.65–0.84), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71–0.87) and 0.98 (0.98–0.99) respectively, which indicated good to excellent agreement.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study validated the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) for evaluating bone healing in patellar fractures treated with osteosynthesis, demonstrating good intra- and interobserver reliability. The modified RUST can provide a standardized method for assessing healing in patellar fractures, benefiting both clinical practice and clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05736-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distinct knee phenotype variation: a comparative analysis of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty 不同的膝关节表型变异:内侧和外侧单室膝关节置换术的比较分析
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05730-7
Yuhu Zhao, Xin Liu, Huaqiang Tao, Xiaolong Liang, Kai Zheng, Jun Zhou, Dechun Geng, Yaozeng Xu

Purpose

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively less common than medial UKA. There has been no comparative analysis of the constitutional phenotypes of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Furthermore, the study analyzed whether CPAK phenotypes were maintained or altered after medial or lateral UKA.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent UKA. A radiological analysis was conducted using an EOS imaging system, and demographic data of patients undergoing UKA were collected. Performed measurements included the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), lateral distal femur angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), which were analyzed both before and after UKA. The CPAK classification was used to classify knee alignment phenotypes.

Results

A total of 310 knees of 244 patients were included in the study that underwent non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing UKA (279 medial; 31 lateral). Preoperatively, the most common categories for knees were Type I (varus mechanical axis, 53.8%) in medial UKA and Type III (valgus alignment, 77.4%) in lateral UKA. Postoperatively, Type II (neutral mechanical axis) became the most common type for both groups, accounting for 34.1% in the medial UKA group and 25.8% in the lateral UKA group. Only 31.3% preserved their preoperative CPAK classification after the surgery (32.3% and 22.6%, respectively).

Conclusion

The CPAK classification differs significantly between knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. While 31.3% of knees maintained their native knee phenotype, there is a tendency towards a neutrally aligned classification after surgery for both medial and lateral UKA. The CPAK classification optimizes preoperative categorization and may assist surgeons in tailoring personalized therapies to improve clinical outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level III.

目的:与内侧单室膝关节置换术相比,外侧单室膝关节置换术相对较少见。目前还没有比较分析的体质表型的膝关节经历内侧和外侧UKA。因此,本研究旨在比较内侧和外侧UKA患者的膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类。此外,研究分析了内侧或外侧UKA后CPAK表型是否维持或改变。方法回顾性分析连续行UKA的患者。使用EOS成像系统进行放射学分析,并收集UKA患者的人口统计数据。测量包括机械髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角(mHKA)、外侧股骨远端角(LDFA)和内侧胫骨近端角(MPTA),分别在UKA前后进行分析。采用CPAK分类对膝关节排列表型进行分类。结果244例患者共310个膝关节被纳入研究,这些患者接受了非机器人辅助的固定轴承UKA(279个内侧;31侧)。术前,膝关节最常见的类型是内侧UKA的I型(机械轴内翻,53.8%)和外侧UKA的III型(外翻对齐,77.4%)。术后两组均以II型(中性机械轴)为最常见类型,内侧UKA组占34.1%,外侧UKA组占25.8%。术后只有31.3%的患者保留了术前的CPAK分类(分别为32.3%和22.6%)。结论内侧和外侧UKA患者的CPAK分型有显著差异。虽然31.3%的膝关节保持其原有的膝关节表型,但内侧和外侧UKA手术后倾向于中性排列分类。CPAK分类优化了术前分类,并可帮助外科医生定制个性化治疗以改善临床结果。证据等级:III级。
{"title":"Distinct knee phenotype variation: a comparative analysis of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty","authors":"Yuhu Zhao,&nbsp;Xin Liu,&nbsp;Huaqiang Tao,&nbsp;Xiaolong Liang,&nbsp;Kai Zheng,&nbsp;Jun Zhou,&nbsp;Dechun Geng,&nbsp;Yaozeng Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05730-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05730-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively less common than medial UKA. There has been no comparative analysis of the constitutional phenotypes of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Furthermore, the study analyzed whether CPAK phenotypes were maintained or altered after medial or lateral UKA.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent UKA. A radiological analysis was conducted using an EOS imaging system, and demographic data of patients undergoing UKA were collected. Performed measurements included the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), lateral distal femur angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), which were analyzed both before and after UKA. The CPAK classification was used to classify knee alignment phenotypes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 310 knees of 244 patients were included in the study that underwent non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing UKA (279 medial; 31 lateral). Preoperatively, the most common categories for knees were Type I (varus mechanical axis, 53.8%) in medial UKA and Type III (valgus alignment, 77.4%) in lateral UKA. Postoperatively, Type II (neutral mechanical axis) became the most common type for both groups, accounting for 34.1% in the medial UKA group and 25.8% in the lateral UKA group. Only 31.3% preserved their preoperative CPAK classification after the surgery (32.3% and 22.6%, respectively).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CPAK classification differs significantly between knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. While 31.3% of knees maintained their native knee phenotype, there is a tendency towards a neutrally aligned classification after surgery for both medial and lateral UKA. The CPAK classification optimizes preoperative categorization and may assist surgeons in tailoring personalized therapies to improve clinical outcomes.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142889839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variations in clinical practice of one-stage septic revisions in chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections: an international questionnaire study 慢性髋关节和膝关节假体周围关节感染一期脓毒性修复的临床实践差异:一项国际问卷研究
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05690-y
Michelle M. J. Jacobs, Karin Veerman, Jon H. M. Goosen

Introduction

Recent studies have increasingly provided evidence that one-stage septic revisions for hip and knee are a safe treatment option for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in selected patients. However, there is still a wide treatment variation concerning indications and execution among different practices. This study aimed to describe these differences.

Methods

We set out an online questionnaire among members of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) in September 2023. The questionnaire consisted of questions investigating indications, execution, and preferences regarding one-stage hip and knee septic revisions. Descriptive analysis was performed of all results and Chi-squared tests were used to test for differences in opinions between subgroups of respondents.

Results

Sixty-five orthopaedic revision arthroplasty surgeons completed the questionnaire. 68% prefer to standardly perform two-stage revisions and only do one-stage revisions in selected patients. However, there was no consensus on which (contra-)indications should be used to select these patients. The most important reason to not perform one-stage revisions was fear of a higher reinfection risk, partly due to inconclusive literature. There was also no consensus on which perioperative antimicrobial measures should be applied.

Conclusions

Notable differences in indications for and execution of one-stage septic revisions persist. We encourage others to share their experiences with this procedure. Moreover, clinical trials should be undertaken to provide stronger evidence for the safety of one-stage septic revisions and to provide clear and uniform guidelines.

最近的研究越来越多地提供证据表明,髋关节和膝关节一期脓毒性修复术是特定患者假体周围关节感染(PJI)的安全治疗选择。然而,在不同的实践中,在适应症和执行方面仍然存在很大的治疗差异。本研究旨在描述这些差异。方法于2023年9月对欧洲骨关节感染学会(EBJIS)会员进行在线问卷调查。调查问卷包括调查适应症、执行和对一期髋关节和膝关节脓毒性修复的偏好的问题。对所有结果进行描述性分析,并使用卡方检验来检验被调查者亚组之间的意见差异。结果65名骨科翻修关节成形术医师完成问卷调查。68%的人倾向于标准地进行两期修复,而在选定的患者中只进行一期修复。然而,对于哪些(反)适应症应该用于选择这些患者,并没有达成共识。不进行一期修复的最重要原因是担心更高的再感染风险,部分原因是文献不确定。对于围手术期应采取何种抗菌措施也没有达成共识。结论一期脓毒症修复术的适应证和执行仍存在显著差异。我们鼓励其他人分享他们在这方面的经验。此外,应该进行临床试验,为一期脓毒症治疗的安全性提供更有力的证据,并提供明确和统一的指南。
{"title":"Variations in clinical practice of one-stage septic revisions in chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections: an international questionnaire study","authors":"Michelle M. J. Jacobs,&nbsp;Karin Veerman,&nbsp;Jon H. M. Goosen","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05690-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05690-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Recent studies have increasingly provided evidence that one-stage septic revisions for hip and knee are a safe treatment option for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in selected patients. However, there is still a wide treatment variation concerning indications and execution among different practices. This study aimed to describe these differences.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We set out an online questionnaire among members of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) in September 2023. The questionnaire consisted of questions investigating indications, execution, and preferences regarding one-stage hip and knee septic revisions. Descriptive analysis was performed of all results and Chi-squared tests were used to test for differences in opinions between subgroups of respondents.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five orthopaedic revision arthroplasty surgeons completed the questionnaire. 68% prefer to standardly perform two-stage revisions and only do one-stage revisions in selected patients. However, there was no consensus on which (contra-)indications should be used to select these patients. The most important reason to not perform one-stage revisions was fear of a higher reinfection risk, partly due to inconclusive literature. There was also no consensus on which perioperative antimicrobial measures should be applied.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Notable differences in indications for and execution of one-stage septic revisions persist. We encourage others to share their experiences with this procedure. Moreover, clinical trials should be undertaken to provide stronger evidence for the safety of one-stage septic revisions and to provide clear and uniform guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142880499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question can be used for a quick assessment of patients undergoing knee surgery 一个简单的,主观的,膝关节自我评估使用一个单一的问题,可用于快速评估患者接受膝关节手术
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9
Antonio Klasan, Cedric Donati, Riccardo Compagnoni, Alberto Grassi, Volker Musahl, Jacques Menetrey

Purpose

The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient’s subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.

Methods

A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: ”How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?” Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.

Results

After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (p = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (p < 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (p < 0.001), but with a model fitness of r2 = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.

Conclusion

IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients’ subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.

目的:采用患者报告的预后指标(PROMS)是外科学科临床研究的基石,但在日常工作中的使用可能具有挑战性。膝关节手术中最广泛的PROMS之一是国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)问卷调查。本研究的目的是通过一个单一的问题来研究IKDC评分与患者对膝关节的主观评估的潜在相关性。我们假设IKDC得分与单题得分之间存在相关性。方法对某综合性膝关节门诊进行前瞻性、单中心研究。第一次到诊所就诊的患者被要求完成IKDC问卷,并回答以下问题:“与16岁时相比,您的膝关节膝关节知度如何?”采用Pearson相关系数和线性回归分析IKDC评分和单题百分比。结果应用纳入和排除标准,纳入310例患者。参与者的平均年龄为43.3±9.6岁,女性占45.2%。平均IKDC得分为41.11±13.13分,单题平均得分为40.90±22.7分(p = 0.887)。IKDC得分与单题的相关性显著(p < 0.001),但人系数为0.460,相关性中等。线性回归分析也有统计学意义(p < 0.001),但模型适应度r2 = 0.211, B = 0.266。在310例患者中,305例(98.4%)发现单一问题比IKDC评分更相关。结论ikdc评分与简单、主观、单题的膝关节自我评价有中度相关性。单题可用于更好地了解客观评分与患者对膝关节功能的主观感知之间的差异,或作为快速的单题代理评分。
{"title":"A simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question can be used for a quick assessment of patients undergoing knee surgery","authors":"Antonio Klasan,&nbsp;Cedric Donati,&nbsp;Riccardo Compagnoni,&nbsp;Alberto Grassi,&nbsp;Volker Musahl,&nbsp;Jacques Menetrey","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient’s subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: ”How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?” Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (<i>p</i> = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), but with a model fitness of r<sup>2</sup> = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients’ subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142880393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative outcome of screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting for the management of hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion 自体植骨螺钉固定治疗拇籽骨骨折不愈合的疗效
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05612-y
Young Hwan Park, Sei Wook Son, Sung Jin Ahn, Hee Soh Yoo, Hak Jun Kim

Introduction

Although sesamoid-preserving procedures have been attempted to complement sesamoidectomy for hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion, few reports document the results. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients with hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion who underwent screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting.

Materials and methods

Medical records of patients who underwent surgery between January 2013 and September 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed using the foot function index (FFI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Fracture union was assessed using plain radiographs and computed tomography scans.

Results

Ten patients (4 males and 6 females) were enrolled. The mean age was 39.4 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.0), and the mean follow-up duration was 23.4 months (SD, 14.5). The FFI score improved from 72.3 (SD, 8.7) preoperatively to 8.2 (SD, 10.7) 12 months postoperatively and to 6.6 (SD, 8.3) at the final follow-up (p < 0.01, respectively). The VAS score improved from 67.8 (SD, 13.5) preoperatively to 2.2 (SD, 3.8) 12 months postoperatively, finally improving to 3.6 (SD, 4.8) at the final follow-up (p < 0.01, respectively). Union was achieved in all patients 3 months postoperatively. Although no complications were observed, hardware removal was performed in two patients owing to discomfort and psychological anxiety.

Conclusion

Given that the symptoms improved in all patients without complications, as observed in this study, screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting appears to be a viable option for treating hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion.

虽然保留籽骨的手术被尝试作为对拇籽骨骨折不愈合的补充,但很少有报道记录结果。因此,本研究的目的是回顾拇籽骨骨折不愈合患者接受自体植骨螺钉固定的结果。材料与方法回顾2013年1月至2022年9月期间接受手术的患者的医疗记录。采用足部功能指数(FFI)和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估结果。通过x线平片和计算机断层扫描评估骨折愈合。结果纳入患者10例(男4例,女6例)。平均年龄39.4岁(标准差[SD], 14.0),平均随访23.4个月(SD, 14.5)。FFI评分从术前的72.3 (SD, 8.7)提高到术后12个月的8.2 (SD, 10.7),最终随访时的6.6 (SD, 8.3),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。VAS评分由术前67.8 (SD, 13.5)改善至术后12个月的2.2 (SD, 3.8),最终随访时改善至3.6 (SD, 4.8) (p < 0.01)。所有患者术后3个月愈合。虽然没有观察到并发症,但由于不适和心理焦虑,两名患者进行了硬体取出。结论本研究观察到,所有患者的症状均得到改善,无并发症,自体植骨螺钉固定似乎是治疗拇籽骨骨折不愈合的可行选择。
{"title":"Postoperative outcome of screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting for the management of hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion","authors":"Young Hwan Park,&nbsp;Sei Wook Son,&nbsp;Sung Jin Ahn,&nbsp;Hee Soh Yoo,&nbsp;Hak Jun Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05612-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05612-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although sesamoid-preserving procedures have been attempted to complement sesamoidectomy for hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion, few reports document the results. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients with hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion who underwent screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Medical records of patients who underwent surgery between January 2013 and September 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed using the foot function index (FFI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Fracture union was assessed using plain radiographs and computed tomography scans.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten patients (4 males and 6 females) were enrolled. The mean age was 39.4 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.0), and the mean follow-up duration was 23.4 months (SD, 14.5). The FFI score improved from 72.3 (SD, 8.7) preoperatively to 8.2 (SD, 10.7) 12 months postoperatively and to 6.6 (SD, 8.3) at the final follow-up (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, respectively). The VAS score improved from 67.8 (SD, 13.5) preoperatively to 2.2 (SD, 3.8) 12 months postoperatively, finally improving to 3.6 (SD, 4.8) at the final follow-up (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, respectively). Union was achieved in all patients 3 months postoperatively. Although no complications were observed, hardware removal was performed in two patients owing to discomfort and psychological anxiety.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Given that the symptoms improved in all patients without complications, as observed in this study, screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting appears to be a viable option for treating hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142880545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mid-term radiographic evaluation of a monoblock trabecular metal tibia following total knee arthroplasty in obese and morbidly obese patients 肥胖和病态肥胖患者全膝关节置换术后单块金属胫骨小梁的中期影像学评价
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0
Drew Dalby, Alyssa M. Robison, Anthony Forrest, Steven Bennett, Ashni Patel, Jason Cholewa, Lindsey Rolston

Background

Indications for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become more inclusive of morbidly obese patients, however, higher rates of complications and lower implant survival have also been reported in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term survival, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of a cementless trabecular metal monoblock tibial component in severely obese patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of class II and III obese (BMI > 35) patients who received a cementless primary TKA. Standing radiographs were assessed for the presence of progressive tibial radiolucent lines (RLL), and clinical measures were assessed at least 2 years post-operative via the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity and Satisfaction Score, and the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health status.

Results

Patients (n = 176) were 61.2 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 44.9 ± 6.5 kg/m2, and were predominantly female (n = 118, 66.7%). Mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 17.1 months. There were two total revisions at 6- and 57-months post-operative, respectively, and the 5-year survival estimate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 99.6%). Patient satisfaction was 93.9% and the post-operative OKS, EQ-5D-5L index, and EQ-VAS were 40.2 ± 7.9, 0.856 ± 0.205, and 73.6 ± 14.7, respectively. No cases of radiolucent lines were detected.

Conclusions

At 6 years this cementless monoblock tibial component demonstrated excellent survival without radiographic indications of aseptic loosening in a population of severely obese patients.

背景:原发性全膝关节置换术(TKA)的适应症越来越多地包括病态肥胖患者,然而,在这一人群中也有较高的并发症发生率和较低的植入物存活率的报道。本研究的目的是调查重度肥胖患者使用无水泥骨小梁金属单块胫骨假体的中期生存率、临床和影像学结果。方法回顾性研究II级和III级肥胖(BMI > 35)接受无骨水泥原发TKA的患者。评估站立x线片是否存在进行性胫骨放射线(RLL),并通过牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、UCLA活动和满意度评分、Euro-QoL 5维(EQ-5D-5L)指数和视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)评估术后至少2年的临床措施。结果176例患者年龄61.2±8.3岁,BMI 44.9±6.5 kg/m2,以女性为主(n = 118, 66.7%)。平均随访59.2±17.1个月。术后6个月和57个月分别进行了两次总修订,5年生存率估计为98.3%(95%可信区间:93.0%,99.6%)。患者满意度为93.9%,术后OKS、EQ-5D-5L指数、EQ-VAS分别为40.2±7.9、0.856±0.205、73.6±14.7。未发现放射性透光线。结论:在严重肥胖患者中,无骨水泥单块胫骨假体在无无菌性松动影像学指征的情况下6年生存率极佳。
{"title":"Mid-term radiographic evaluation of a monoblock trabecular metal tibia following total knee arthroplasty in obese and morbidly obese patients","authors":"Drew Dalby,&nbsp;Alyssa M. Robison,&nbsp;Anthony Forrest,&nbsp;Steven Bennett,&nbsp;Ashni Patel,&nbsp;Jason Cholewa,&nbsp;Lindsey Rolston","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05729-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Indications for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become more inclusive of morbidly obese patients, however, higher rates of complications and lower implant survival have also been reported in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term survival, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of a cementless trabecular metal monoblock tibial component in severely obese patients.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study of class II and III obese (BMI &gt; 35) patients who received a cementless primary TKA. Standing radiographs were assessed for the presence of progressive tibial radiolucent lines (RLL), and clinical measures were assessed at least 2 years post-operative via the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity and Satisfaction Score, and the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health status.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients (n = 176) were 61.2 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 44.9 ± 6.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and were predominantly female (n = 118, 66.7%). Mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 17.1 months. There were two total revisions at 6- and 57-months post-operative, respectively, and the 5-year survival estimate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 99.6%). Patient satisfaction was 93.9% and the post-operative OKS, EQ-5D-5L index, and EQ-VAS were 40.2 ± 7.9, 0.856 ± 0.205, and 73.6 ± 14.7, respectively. No cases of radiolucent lines were detected.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>At 6 years this cementless monoblock tibial component demonstrated excellent survival without radiographic indications of aseptic loosening in a population of severely obese patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nail-plate combination constructs versus single traditional constructs for distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies 股骨远端骨折的钉钢板联合支架与单一传统支架:比较研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6
Anthony N. Baumann, Mathias A. Uhler, Jay Fiechter, Albert T. Anastasio, Kempland C. Walley, Atticus Coscia, Mark E. Hake

Objectives

Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making.

Methods

Data Sources: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients. Data Extraction: Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion. Data Synthesis: Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR).

Results

Five retrospective comparative studies (n = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (p = 0.696), EBL (p = 0.408), or LOS (p = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (p = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (p = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (p = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%).

Conclusion

Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

目的股骨远端骨折(DFF)通常采用单一传统支架(STC)进行手术治疗,如外侧钢板或髓内钉,尽管钉-板联合支架(NPCC)越来越受到关注。本研究的目的是比较NPCC和STC在DFF手术固定中的效果,以指导外科医生的决策。方法数据来源:本研究是对PubMed、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Science Direct和SPORTDiscus从数据库建立到2024年1月10日的系统综述和荟萃分析。研究选择:纳入标准是比较研究,检查成人DFF患者NPCC与STC的临床结果和并发症。数据提取:数据包括手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、住院时间(LOS)、总并发症的可能性、总计划外再手术和畸形愈合。数据综合:统计分析包括使用非标准化平均差异或比值比(or)的随机效应模型。结果5项回顾性比较研究(n = 1368例;平均年龄:52.3±8.1岁;纳入NPCC组134例。与STC组相比,NPCC组DFF术后手术时间(p = 0.696)、EBL (p = 0.408)、LOS (p = 0.963)差异均无统计学意义。NPCC组患者的总并发症数有统计学意义(p = 0.009;OR: 0.31;10.6%对16.0%)和计划外再手术总数(p = 0.027;OR: 0.42;8.2%对14.8%),与DFF后STC组患者相比。然而,尽管NPCC组的病例数远少于STC组(2.9%比10.5%),但两组间的不愈合病例数差异无统计学意义(p = 0.130)。结论与STC治疗DFF的患者相比,NPCC治疗的患者总并发症和总计划外再手术明显减少,手术时间、EBL或LOS无显著差异,尽管这些关联受样本量的限制。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Nail-plate combination constructs versus single traditional constructs for distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies","authors":"Anthony N. Baumann,&nbsp;Mathias A. Uhler,&nbsp;Jay Fiechter,&nbsp;Albert T. Anastasio,&nbsp;Kempland C. Walley,&nbsp;Atticus Coscia,&nbsp;Mark E. Hake","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05723-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p><i>Data Sources</i>: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024. <i>Study Selection</i>: Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients. <i>Data Extraction</i>: Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion. <i>Data Synthesis</i>: Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Five retrospective comparative studies (<i>n</i> = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (<i>p</i> = 0.696), EBL (<i>p</i> = 0.408), or LOS (<i>p</i> = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (<i>p</i> = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (<i>p</i> = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
5-years outcomes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing quadruple hamstring and peroneus longus tendon autografts: a randomized control trial 关节镜下前交叉韧带重建后的5年疗效比较四股腘绳肌和腓长肌腱自体移植:一项随机对照试验
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1
Umer Butt, Filip Vuletic, M Ali Ahmed Shaikh,  Amanullah, Ghufran ur Rehman, Imran Ali Shah, Anders Stålman, Zainab Aqeel Khan

Aims

This study presents clinical outcomes, functional results, and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadruple hamstring tendon autograft or peroneus longus tendon autograft in a randomized controlled trial.

Patients and methods

Between February 2018 and July 2019, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly assigned to two groups: hamstring and peroneus longus. Patient related outcome measurements and pain intensity were evaluated using IKDC, Lysholm, and visual analog scores at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after the surgery. At the 5 year follow-up, anterior stability was tested using the 3D printable Knee Arthrometer. In addition, in the peroneus longus group, ankle functional assessment was performed using the American foot and ankle score. Additionally, data on the return to sports/activities was collected for both groups at the last follow-up.

Results

Sixty patients, with 30 in the hamstring group and 30 in the peroneus group, were included in the study. Patients were predominately male and with low activity demands. After five years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional assessment scores (IKDC and Lysholm) between the two groups (P n.s). The median graft diameter was 7.9 ± 0.4 mm in the hamstring tendon group and 8.9 ± 0.2 mm in the PL group (P < 0.001). The improvement in Arthrometer testing measurements (AMT) for the operated knees in the hamstring and peroneus longus groups were similar. In the peroneus longus group, the mean postoperative foot and ankle score was 98.6 ± 3.9 (range = 85–100).

Conclusion

Using Peroneus longus tendon autograft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a feasible alternative as studied in this cohort of predominately male patients with low activity demands. The graft diameter in this study was sufficient, and the results regarding laxity and patient related outcome measurements were similar to those achieved with hamstring tendon autografts.

Level of evidence

Level I

Trial registration

ChiCTR2000036989

目的:本研究在一项随机对照试验中介绍了使用自体四股腘绳肌腱或自体腓骨长肌腱重建前交叉韧带(ACL)后的临床结果、功能结果和恢复运动的情况。患者和方法2018年2月至2019年7月期间,接受ACL重建的患者随机分为腘绳肌和腓骨长肌两组。在术后3个月、6个月、1年、2年和5年,使用IKDC、Lysholm和视觉模拟评分评估患者相关的结果测量和疼痛强度。在5年的随访中,使用3D打印膝关节计测试前路稳定性。此外,在腓骨长肌组,使用美式足和踝关节评分进行踝关节功能评估。此外,在最后一次随访中收集了两组患者重返体育/活动的数据。结果共纳入60例患者,其中腘绳肌组30例,腓骨肌组30例。患者以男性为主,活动量低。随访5年后,两组功能评估评分(IKDC和Lysholm)无显著差异(P . n.s)。腘绳肌腱组中位直径为7.9±0.4 mm, PL组中位直径为8.9±0.2 mm (P < 0.001)。腘绳肌组和腓骨长肌组术后膝关节关节计测试测量(AMT)的改善相似。腓骨长肌组术后足踝关节平均评分为98.6±3.9(范围= 85-100)。结论自体腓骨长肌腱移植用于关节镜下前交叉韧带重建是一种可行的替代方法,该研究主要针对低活动需求的男性患者。本研究中移植物直径是足够的,关于松弛度和患者相关结果测量的结果与腘绳肌腱自体移植物相似。证据水平试验注册:chictr2000036989
{"title":"5-years outcomes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing quadruple hamstring and peroneus longus tendon autografts: a randomized control trial","authors":"Umer Butt,&nbsp;Filip Vuletic,&nbsp;M Ali Ahmed Shaikh,&nbsp; Amanullah,&nbsp;Ghufran ur Rehman,&nbsp;Imran Ali Shah,&nbsp;Anders Stålman,&nbsp;Zainab Aqeel Khan","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study presents clinical outcomes, functional results, and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadruple hamstring tendon autograft or peroneus longus tendon autograft in a randomized controlled trial.</p><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Between February 2018 and July 2019, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly assigned to two groups: hamstring and peroneus longus. Patient related outcome measurements and pain intensity were evaluated using IKDC, Lysholm, and visual analog scores at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after the surgery. At the 5 year follow-up, anterior stability was tested using the 3D printable Knee Arthrometer. In addition, in the peroneus longus group, ankle functional assessment was performed using the American foot and ankle score. Additionally, data on the return to sports/activities was collected for both groups at the last follow-up.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty patients, with 30 in the hamstring group and 30 in the peroneus group, were included in the study. Patients were predominately male and with low activity demands. After five years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional assessment scores (IKDC and Lysholm) between the two groups (P <i>n.s</i>). The median graft diameter was 7.9 ± 0.4 mm in the hamstring tendon group and 8.9 ± 0.2 mm in the PL group (P &lt; 0.001). The improvement in Arthrometer testing measurements (AMT) for the operated knees in the hamstring and peroneus longus groups were similar. In the peroneus longus group, the mean postoperative foot and ankle score was 98.6 ± 3.9 (range = 85–100).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using Peroneus longus tendon autograft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a feasible alternative as studied in this cohort of predominately male patients with low activity demands. The graft diameter in this study was sufficient, and the results regarding laxity and patient related outcome measurements were similar to those achieved with hamstring tendon autografts.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level I</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ChiCTR2000036989</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1