Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery最新文献

Introduction: To consider the inherent respondent burden of PROMs, the HOOS-12 as a shortform of the well-established HOOS questionnaire has been published. While the HOOS-12 has been validated in an initial study, further evaluation in other, non-English speaking cohorts is necessary. We therefore aimed to evaluate responsiveness, convergent construct validity, internal consistency, and floor and ceiling effects of the HOOS-12 in a cross-sectoral german cohort.

Materials and methods: European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions scores and HOOS data of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) were used for the analyses. HOOS-12 scores were calculated from the full length HOOS. Statistical analysis was conducted, investigating internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, convergent and discriminant validity, responsiveness, and known-group comparisons.

Results: A ceiling effect was present for postoperative HOOS-12 score and its pain, function and QoL subscales. Internal consistency was high between baseline and all follow ups, inter-item correlation was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.30) for HOOS-12 score and all subscales. Correlation of HOOS-12 pain with HOOS pain was high (r = 0.9). Correlation of HOOS-12 function with HOOS ADL and HOOS S/R was high (r = 0.89, r = 0.74). Correlation was moderate between HOOS-12 pain and HOOS-12 function with its respective EQ-5D score (r=-0.58, r=-0.59).

Conclusion: The HOOS-12 showed good convergent construct validity and is responsive to changes in pain, function, QoL and hip impact between preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. A substantial ceiling effect for all subscales at 1 year postoperatively limits the ability to capture variance across particularly well performing patients.

Trial registration: The Trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register ( https://www.drks.de ; DRKS00013972; 23 March 23, 2018).

Background: The European Foot and Ankle Score EFAS and the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score SEFAS are two Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used in foot and ankle surgery. The EFAS has been published in recent years, while the SEFAS is a validated questionnaire based on the New Zealand total ankle questionnaire.

Methods: We compared the EFAS to the SEFAS, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) regarding reliability and validity based on the results of 126 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in a single center.

Results: Both the EFAS and SEFAS demonstrate good psychometric properties with comparable reliability and validity. The EFAS questionnaire portrays pain and physical function as well as those well-established tools of SEFAS, NRS and SF-36.

Conclusions: In conclusion both the EFAS and SEFAS show good psychometric properties with comparable results for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change and strong correlation for the corresponding domains describing pain and physical function.

Levels of evidence: III.

Introduction: Comparative studies evaluating the different material and surface finishing of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are lacking. Using a regional arthroplasty registry, the survival rates and the hazard ratios of different cups in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis were assessed, using endpoints: (1) every cup failure, (2) cup aseptic loosening, (3) periprosthetic infection.

Materials and methods: The inclusion criteria were: residing patients, THA for primary osteoarthritis, Delta-on-Delta bearings, head sizes 32 mm and 36 mm. Only the most implanted cementless cups were considered and were grouped according to material and surface finishing into three cohorts: 3D printed cups (I), ultraporous tantalum or titanium- coated cups (II), second-generation cups (III). 15,737 cups were included in the study: 9,862 cups (62.7%) in cohort I, 2,067 implants (13.1%) in cohort II, 3,808 implants (24.2%) in cohort III.

Results: The three cohorts achieved comparable general 10-year survival rates (p = 0.62). In I and II cohorts, the survival rates of the cup types within cohorts were analogous (p = 0.86 and p = 0.31), but not in cohort III (p = 0.004). The hazard ratios for overall failure adjusted for age and sex were similar among the cohorts. Regarding cup aseptic loosening, the three cohorts had similar rates (p = 0.48) and similar adjusted hazard ratios. With periprosthetic hip infection as endpoint, the survival rates and the adjusted hazard ratios of the three cohorts were comparable (p = 0.68).

Conclusions: 3D printed cups provided similar 10-year outcomes compared to ultraporous cups and second-generation cups, with no additional risks of aseptic loosening and infection.

Level of evidence: IV (therapeutic study).

Take home message: - 3D printed cups provided similar 10-year outcomes compared to ultraporous cups and second-generation cups. - There is no additional risks of aseptic loosening and infection.

Purpose: Periprosthetic loosening is a major complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential to choose the right therapeutic path and to avoid further complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Gallium-Zoledronate ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA^Zol) PET/CT in detecting periprosthetic loosening in total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: This retrospective study included 26 patients with painful prosthesis (THA n = 17; TKA n = 16) and clinical suspicion of periprosthetic loosening, but without a confirmed diagnosis. Patients underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA^Zol PET/CT at least one year post-implantation. Diagnosis was confirmed through revision surgery or long-term clinical follow-up, with an observation period of at least 6 months. The analysis included both an assessment of the prosthesis as a unit and a separate evaluation of the individual components. Statistical analysis involved calculating sensitivity, specificity and accuracy using SPSS.

Results: Overall, a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 95.8% and an accuracy of 90.9% were found for detecting periprosthetic loosening, when considering the prosthesis as a unit. Individual component analyses showed a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 96.2%.

Conclusion: The use of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA^Zol PET/CT in periprosthetic loosening is a remarkable diagnostic tool and a promising approach. In comparison to established radionuclide tracers, ⁶⁸Gallium-Zoledronate offers notable advantages due to its availability via ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga-generators, improving its potential for clinical application.

Background: This study aims to explore the relationship between Lower limb alignment parameters and the degree of Medial Meniscal Extrusion (MME) in patients with Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA), in hopes of providing new reference data for the prevention and treatment of KOA.

Methods: A retrospective study design was employed, analyzing 623 KOA patients treated at our hospital from 2022 to 2023, with 307 patients' information collected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into mild and severe groups based on the degree of MME, and differences in Lower limb alignment parameters between the two groups were compared. Univariate analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and multivariate stepwise regression analysis were used, along with Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve assessment to evaluate the predictive value of Lower limb alignment parameters on the degree of MME.

Results: Univariate analysis showed significant correlations between Anatomic Mechanical Axis (AMA), Joint Line Convergence Angle (JLCA), mechanical Lateral Distal Femur Angle (mLDFA), Medial Proximal Tibia Angle (MPTA), and the degree of MME (P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis further confirmed the positive correlations between these parameters and the degree of MME. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis indicated that AMA, JLCA, and mLDFA are significant independent predictors of the severity of MME. ROC analysis suggested that the combination of AMA, JLCA, and mLDFA could better predict severe MME.

Conclusion: AMA, JLCA, and mLDFA are closely related to the degree of MME in KOA patients and can serve as important parameters for assessing the severity of MME, holding significant implications for the early prevention and treatment of KOA.

Introduction: Many patients who have undergone a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) have had jobs preoperatively. Postoperative return to work and work productivity are important for livelihood security and the social economy. However, there is a lack of evidence on work productivity after PAOs. Therefore, this study investigated the return to work rates and influence of workload, clinical, and radiographic parameters on work productivity after a curved PAO.

Materials and methods: In this study, the data of 68 hip joints among 48 participants who underwent curved PAO for symptomatic DDH were analyzed. Correlations between postoperative work productivity and clinical, radiographic, and workload parameters were assessed. Work productivity was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Clinical factors were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) and University of California, Los Angeles Activity scores. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were compared with postoperative work productivity. The workload was categorized using the Reichsausschuß für Arbeitszeitermittlung (REFA)-classification system.

Results: Of the participants, 98% returned to work and 87.5% returned to their original jobs. Work productivity was significantly improved in all workload categories at the 1-year postoperative follow-up. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative Tönnis and REFA classification grades were significantly associated with the postoperative WPAI.

Conclusion: Curved PAOs can improve postoperative work productivity and return to work rates. Preoperative progression of osteoarthritis and heavy workload affect postoperative work productivity.

Purpose: Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) represent promising options in the conservative treatment of early stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Although the combined use of these two compounds seems to have a synergistic effect in pre-clinical studies, few clinical trials compared the association of PRP and HA with PRP and HA alone. The aim of study is to evaluate the efficacy of combined intra-articular injections of PRP and HA in the treatment of mild to moderate knee OA, compared to PRP and HA alone.

Methods: One hundred and seventy-four patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo three intra-articular injections of either HA or PRP or the combination of PRP and HA with a two-week interval period. Patients were evaluated before treatment and after 3, 6, and 12 months using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Visual Analogue Scale and TEGNER Activity Scores.

Results: All the treatments proved to be effective in reducing pain and improving joint function. The analysis of covariance did not show statistically significant differences among the three groups for any of the investigated outcome parameters after 6 and 12 months (WOMAC: p = 0.45 and p = 0.64, respectively). No significant differences were found in terms of adverse events (p = 0.49) and painkiller use (p = 0.28 and p = 0.56, respectively) among the three groups.

Conclusion: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial revealed that intra-articular injections of PRP + HA, PRP, or HA represent a safe and viable treatment with comparable efficacy in terms of pain relief and functional outcomes in mild to moderate knee OA.

Metal-on-metal (MoM) large headed arthroplasties were suggested to decrease failure rates by means of reduced volumetric wear and enhanced implant stability. However, they caused high rates of revisions due to adverse reaction to metal debris, osteolysis, pseudotumor growth, and other issues. The study aims to present the long-term outcomes of MoM arthroplasties on a large cohort of patients, evaluating the impact of head sizes on survival rate. All data were retrieved from the regional joint register (Registro dell'Implantologia Protesica Ortopedica, RIPO, Italy). We include in the study all patient who underwent cementless MoM total hip arthroplasties (THAs) between 2000 and 2020, dividing them in two subgroups according to head size (<36 mm, ≥36 mm). Failures were recorded up to December 31, 2020. Patients lost to follow-up were excluded. A total of 3813 THAs met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The average follow-up period is 12.4 years (0-21 years). 178/1625 (or 11.0%) small head MoM THAs and 265/2188 large head ones failed by the end of follow up. Large diameter heads reported lower survival rate (p-value < 0.001), with unexpected higher dislocation rate (1.0 vs. 0.4%). Moreover, large head size was found to increases the risk of metallosis (p-value < 0.0001). Gender, patient's age and the use of modular neck were not correlated with higher failure rates. MoM implants implants do not have the same reliability as other couplings, considering the significantly greater failure/complication rates. However, the knowledge of risks linked to head size is fundamental for establishing the right type of follow-up to the patient and recognize any complications early.

Introduction: The combination of anterior large glenoid rim fractures (GRF) and proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is rare, with limited data available on specific treatments for these glenohumeral combination fractures (GCF). This study aimed to evaluate the treatment approaches for GCF, analyze patient outcomes, and outline surgical management strategies for different fracture types.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients with GCF, excluding those with fossa glenoidalis fractures, isolated greater tuberosity fractures, or small glenoid rim fractures (< 5 mm). Preoperative radiographs, CT scans, and follow-up radiographs were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe Score (RS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS).

Results: Sixteen patients with 17 GCFs (mean age 62 years) were followed for an average of 39 months. PHFs were categorized into three-part (76%), four-part (12%), and two-part fractures (12%). The average medial displacement of GRF was 5 mm, with an average dehiscence of 4 mm in the sagittal plane. Fourteen patients (88%) underwent surgical treatment; 35% had only the PHF surgically addressed, while 53% had both lesions surgically treated. Two patients (12%) received non-operative treatment. Complications were observed in 29% of cases, primarily involving the humeral side. The average CMS was 68 points, WOSI was 75%, RS was 77 points, and OSS was 41 points.

Conclusion: Treating GCF is complex and routinely necessitates surgical intervention, with or without GRF refixation. CT imaging is crucial for precise assessment of fracture morphology. The involvement of the minor tuberosity is critical in selecting the optimal surgical approach and managing the subscapularis muscle.

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent condition frequently necessitating knee replacement surgery, with demand projected to rise substantially. Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) offers advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet its utilisation remains low despite guidance recommending consideration alongside TKA in shared decision making. Radiographic decision aids exist but are underutilised due to clinician time constraints.

Materials and methods: This research develops a novel radiographic artificial intelligence (AI) tool using a dataset of knee radiographs and a panel of expert orthopaedic surgeons' assessments. Six AI models were trained to identify PKA candidacy.

Results: 1241 labelled four-view radiograph series were included. Models achieved statistically significant accuracies above random assignment, with EfficientNet-ES demonstrating the highest performance (AUC 95%, F1 score 83% and accuracy 80%).

Conclusions: The AI decision tool shows promise in identifying PKA candidates, potentially addressing underutilisation of this procedure. Its integration into clinical practice could enhance shared decision making and improve patient outcomes. Further validation and implementation studies are warranted to assess real-world utility and impact.