Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery最新文献

Introduction: More than 100 surgical techniques are described for hallux valgus (HV) correction, but the most appropriate technique remains debatable. The aim of this study was to develop and conduct a "living systematic review" for the outcome of surgically treated HV.

Materials and methods: The "living systematic review" was conducted per the PRISMA-P and PICOS guidelines and is the basis for the German AWMF S2e guideline "Hallux valgus" (033-018). Four common databases and the grey-literature were searched. Eligible were studies on adult patients comparing either two different primary surgical interventions or the same primary surgical intervention for different hallux valgus severities. The main outcome parameters were the osseous correction potential and the patient rated outcome.

Results: Out of 3022 studies, 46 studies (100 arms) were included. The meta-analysis included 31 studies (53 arms). The IMA (1933 procedures) improved on average by 7.3°, without significant group differences. The HVA (1883 procedures) improved on average by 18.9°, with significantly better results for third generation MIS (21.2°). The AOFAS (1338 procedures) improved on average by 33.8 points without significant group differences. The meta-regression revealed constant AOFAS scores over time. 69%/39% of the correction potential for the IMA/HVA could be explained by the preoperative values and 82% of the AOFAS improvement by the preoperative AOFAS scores.

Conclusion: Open and minimally invasive techniques are powerful tools to correct hallux valgus deformity. Third generation MIS procedures revealed a possible superiority for the correction of the HVA. The AOFAS improvement appeared to be constant over time.

Level of evidence: Level I; living systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies (level II) and randomized controlled trials (level I).

Introduction: In orthopaedic research, it is crucial to determine changes that are statistically significant and clinically meaningful. One approach to accomplish this is by calculating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), the Clinically Important Differences (CID), the Minimum Detectable Change (MDC), the Minimal Important Change (MIC), and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) values. These tools assist medical professionals in comprehending the patient's viewpoint, enabling them to establish treatment objectives that align with patients' desires and expectations. The present systematic review investigated the MCID, MIC, CID, MDC, and PASS of the most used PROMs to assess patients who have undergone THA.

Methods: This systematic review followed the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed were accessed in March 2024 without time constraints or additional filters. All the clinical investigations which evaluated data tools (MCID, MIC, CID, MDC, and PASS) to assess the clinical relevance of PROMs in THA were accessed. Articles in Spanish, Italian, German, and English were eligible. Studies with levels of evidence I to III were eligible.

Results: Data from 100,824 patients were collected. All relevant demographic data were analysed and summarised. In addition, the MCID, MIC, CID, MDC and PASS of the COMI, HOOS, SF-36, OHS, Oxford-12, PROMIS-PF, SF-12, and WOMAC scores for THA were determined.

Conclusion: Current evidence recommends to collect MCIDs based on anchors routinely. These values should be used as complementary tools to determine the clinical effectiveness of a treatment instead of solely relying on statistically significant improvements.

Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Recent projections suggest a substantial rise in demand for revision total hip arthroplasties, emphasizing the need for optimized perioperative care. Various revision techniques, such as isolated acetabular or femoral component revisions and total replacements, have garnered attention. Further research is needed to establish the most effective strategies for improving clinical outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use File from 2016 to 2021. The study aimed to compare clinical characteristics and 30-day outcomes among patients undergoing combined acetabular and femoral (A + F) revision,  acetabulum-only (A) revision, and femoral side-only (F) revision surgeries.

Results: The analysis of 18,888 patients revealed crucial differences in preoperative and postoperative outcomes among various revision strategies. Specifically, there were notable variations in patient demographics, comorbidities, and emergency procedures. Postoperative data showed distinct rates of mortality, complications, and readmissions across the groups. Notably, femoral component revisions were associated with increased risks of mortality, transfusion, and urinary tract infections, underscoring the need for careful evaluation and consideration when opting for this revision approach.

Conclusion: The study's significance lies in its extensive patient cohort and multifaceted evaluation of revision strategies. Although consensus is lacking on single-component revisions, targeting the acetabulum component appears relatively safer. Continued research and individualized evaluations are crucial for refining revision strategies and optimizing outcomes in THA revisions.

Background: Cigarette smoking is known to result in poorer outcomes for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Smoking tobacco cigarettes in the perioperative period is associated with higher analgesia usage, increased mortality, poorer healing, and an increased risk of medical complications. As such, many surgeons advise their patients not to smoke in the perioperative period. Electronic cigarettes are emerging as a popular alternative for usage by patients who would otherwise continue to smoke traditional cigarettes. Importantly, there has been limited investigation into the impact of electronic cigarette usage on the outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. This review investigates the potential detrimental effects caused by the usage of electronic cigarettes on the outcomes of total joint arthroplasty.

Methods: A systematic review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. We have drawn from studies that investigated the impact of the constituents of E-cigarette vapour on bone health, wound healing, the immune system and the direct impact of electronic cigarette usage on surgical outcomes.

Results: Electronic cigarettes release nicotine in an inconsistent manner, resulting in many negative consequences for bone health. Furthermore, they depress the immune system, impair wound healing and may result in longer hospital stays.

Conclusions: Electronic cigarette usage should be monitored in the perioperative period to reduce the risk of complication. There is a pressing need for more comprehensive research in this area to fully understand the implications of EC usage on the outcomes of total joint arthroplasty.

Background: Carpal tunnel release is a widely performed procedure. Despite a high success rate, iatrogenic neurovascular injuries can occur which lead to a painful and unsatisfying outcome. This study conducted a detailed examination of the anatomy of the carpal tunnel and the proximity of neurovascular structures that are particularly susceptible to injury, especially in the context of minimally invasive carpal tunnel release procedures.

Patients and methods: The anatomy of the carpal tunnel of 104 wrists of 52 body donors was examined. The precise anatomical location and the presence of variations were recorded for the median nerve, ulnar nerve, ulnar artery and Berrettini branch. The distance between the median nerve, the ulnar artery, the ulnar nerve, and the Berrettini branch was measured in a proximo-distal and radio-ulnar direction in relation to the distal ulnar end of the carpal tunnel.

Results: The authors identified four main dangerous anatomical situations. (1) A proximal separation of the Long-Finger/Ring-Finger branch of the median nerve together with a narrow safe-zone; (2) an ulnar take-off of the recurrent muscle branch of the median nerve with a close radio-ulnar distance to the distal ulnar end of carpal tunnel; (3) an ulnar arterial arch lying close to the transverse carpal ligament; and (4) a proximal Berrettini branch also lying close to the latter. All situations are illustrated by photographs. Additionally, the authors present a sonographic carpal tunnel assessment protocol in order to reduce the risk of injury of any neurovascular structure in the proximity of the carpal tunnel.

Conclusion: Certain patients may inherently face an increased risk of neurovascular injuries during minimally invasive carpal tunnel releases due to their anatomical variations. Four potentially risky scenarios were clearly illustrated. Consequently, one may consider conducting a preoperative ultrasound assessment of neurovascular structures at risk, when endoscopic or ultrasound-guided tunnel release are planned. In high-risk patients, open surgery should be preferred.

Level of evidence: II.

Background: The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide and it is known to be associated with many postoperative complications, including infection. Patients' body fat distribution may vary and body mass index (BMI) does not provide sufficient information about adipose tissue thickness of the lower extremities. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between thigh diameters and early postoperative prosthesis-related joint infections (PJI) in patients who underwent arthroplasty.

Methods: The study included 76 patients and 114 knees who were operated on by a single surgeon and underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to primary knee osteoarthritis between May 2022 and September 2023 in a tertiary reference hospital. Circumference of the thickest part of the operated thigh (cm), preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, height, weight, BMI and the presence of early postoperative prosthesis-related joint infections were evaluated.

Results: The mean BMI was 32.6 ± 4.2 (kg/m²). Two (2.6%) were normal weight, 14 (18.5%) were overweight, 58 (76.3%) were obese and 2 (2.6%) were morbidly obese. The mean circumference of the thickest part of the thigh was 57.56 ± 6.38 (cm). 6 patients were diagnosed with PJI in the acute phase. The mean circumference of the thickest part of the thigh was statistically significantly greater in the group with acute PJI compared to the group without PJI (p = 0.048).

Conclusion: The incidence of acute PJI was found to be significantly higher in patients with larger thigh diameters, whereas no such relationship was observed for BMI. The incorporation of preoperative soft tissue envelope measurements into routine clinical examination may prove beneficial in reducing the risk of PJI.

Introduction: Prevalence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reported to be 8.32% with largely varying findings in individual studies (5.92-62.07%) due to a heterogeneity in preoperative diagnostic work-up and diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). When diagnosed as unsuspected PJI, re-revision rate is reported to be as high as 18.45% compared to 2.94% in patients with UPIC classified as contamination (p = 0.0237). We performed a monocentric retrospective analysis of revision TKA surgery to determine prevalence of UPIC, risk of developing a subsequent PJI and re-revision rate after 24 months compared to those without UPIC.

Materials and methods: All presumed aseptic total knee revision procedures from 2008 until 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Single stage femorotibial revisions of TKA with at least 3 intraoperative cultures and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included, whereas partial revisions or revisions from unicompartimental knee prosthesis to TKA were excluded. Demographic data were collected as well as initial reason for revision, preoperative aspiration results, micro-organism identified and postoperative antibiotics' administration. Primary outcome was survival rate after 24 months with differentiation based on UPIC interpretation: sterile, contamination, unsuspected PJI.

Results: Of 256 included cases, 75 (29.3%) were found to have at least 1 UPIC during revision surgery, 72% of whom a single UPIC was found. Thirty-four cases (13.28%) were interpreted as unsuspected PJI and therefore treated with antibiotics. In total, 13 of the 256 patients (5.08%) had to be re-revised during follow-up with 7 PJI (2.73%), none of them developing reinfection defined as PJI with the same microorganism. A statistically significant trend towards earlier failure in the unsuspected PJI group compared to the contaminant group was not observed. However, a higher incidence of re-revisions attributed to septic reasons was noted in the former group.

Conclusions: Presence of UPIC in presumed aseptic revision TKA does not correlate with a lower survival rate, but a higher incidence of subsequent PJI was observed in cases interpreted as unsuspected PJI.

Introduction: The total number of total knee arthroplasty performed is rising, and the number of revisions is rising accordingly. Periprosthetic joint infection emerged in recent years as a leading cause of total knee revisions. Bone loss is a real challenge when facing septic knee revisions since radical debridement is crucial to overcome infection. Many devices have already demonstrated to reliably address bone loss and guarantee enhanced fixation. However, the role of balancing metaphyseal fixation and its interplay with the level of constraint has not been elucidated yet.

Material and methods: An institutional arthroplasty registry was retrospectively reviewed looking for patients who underwent two-stage revision of the knee and metaphyseal cones implantation. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of cones only on one side (femoral or tibial, Group U) or both femoral and tibial side (Group B). Failure, aseptic loosening, and revision rates were compared between groups, as were values of patient-reported outcome measure. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival of implants.

Results: A total of 65 patients were included in the analysis and were evaluated at a mean final follow-up of 4 years (range, 2-7). Mean age was 67 (range, 43-81) years. Mean BMI was 27.4 (range, 20-37) kg/m². The overall mean KSS, OKS, ROM significantly increased from baseline values to last follow-up (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients included in Group U had a significantly lower rate of implant survival compared to those included in Group B.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection present considerable rates of complication and failure. Management of bone loss represents a concern for the surgeon, who must achieve a stable fixation. Our study demonstrated that implants characterized by an unbalanced metaphyseal fixation are at higher risk of aseptic loosening and consequent revision, especially when coupled with hinged inserts.