首页 > 最新文献

Applied Animal Science最新文献

英文 中文
Perspective and Commentary: Variation in nutrient composition of feeds and diets and how it can affect formulation of dairy cow diets 观点和评论:饲料和日粮营养成分的变化及其对奶牛日粮配方的影响
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02578
W.P. Weiss, N.R. St-Pierre

Purpose

Our objective was to discuss sources of variation in nutrient composition of feeds and diets, how nutritionists should use that information, methods to reduce nutrient variation, and how nutrient variation may affect dairy cows.

Sources

We reviewed peer-reviewed journals and large nutrient composition databases.

Synthesis

Nutrient composition of feeds varies for multiple reasons including growing, harvesting, and storage conditions and manufacturing processes. These sources are referred to as “true variation” or variation experienced by the cow. The other source of variation is “observer variation,” which includes analytical and sampling variation. Dietary true variation can be reduced by using a TMR and limiting the inclusion of variable feeds. Sampling variation can be reduced by taking duplicate, independent samples. True variation can cause nutrient composition of diets to vary between days. However, current data do not show any substantial negative effects when diets vary day to day if when averaged over a few days, nutrient composition meets diet specifications. Arguably, observer variation can be the greater problem. Observer variation may cause a nutritionist to change a diet when feed composition has not changed, or a diet might be formulated using feed data that are not representative, resulting in a poor diet.

Conclusions and Applications

Typical amounts of true variation in feedstuffs when included in a well-made TMR may not cause significant problems with cows when the variation is centered around the correct mean. Sampling error can lead to poorly balanced diets. To reduce that risk, diet formulation should use the mean of at least 2 duplicate independent samples of the ingredients.

目的我们的目标是讨论饲料和日粮营养成分变异的来源、营养学家应如何使用这些信息、减少营养成分变异的方法以及营养成分变异可能对奶牛产生的影响。综述饲料营养成分变异有多种原因,包括生长、收获和储存条件以及生产工艺。这些原因被称为 "真实变化 "或奶牛经历的变化。另一种变异来源是 "观察者变异",包括分析和取样变异。日粮真实变异可通过使用 TMR 和限制添加可变饲料来减少。采样差异可通过重复、独立采样来减少。真实变异会导致日粮营养成分在不同天之间发生变化。不过,目前的数据显示,如果几天的平均营养成分符合日粮规格,那么日粮每天的变化不会造成任何实质性的负面影响。可以说,观察者的差异可能是更大的问题。观察者的变化可能会导致营养学家在饲料成分没有变化的情况下改变日粮,或者使用不具代表性的饲料数据来配制日粮,从而导致日粮质量不佳。取样误差会导致日粮不平衡。为降低这种风险,日粮配方应使用至少两个重复的独立原料样本的平均值。
{"title":"Perspective and Commentary: Variation in nutrient composition of feeds and diets and how it can affect formulation of dairy cow diets","authors":"W.P. Weiss,&nbsp;N.R. St-Pierre","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02578","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02578","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Our objective was to discuss sources of variation in nutrient composition of feeds and diets, how nutritionists should use that information, methods to reduce nutrient variation, and how nutrient variation may affect dairy cows.</p></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><p>We reviewed peer-reviewed journals and large nutrient composition databases.</p></div><div><h3>Synthesis</h3><p>Nutrient composition of feeds varies for multiple reasons including growing, harvesting, and storage conditions and manufacturing processes. These sources are referred to as “true variation” or variation experienced by the cow. The other source of variation is “observer variation,” which includes analytical and sampling variation. Dietary true variation can be reduced by using a TMR and limiting the inclusion of variable feeds. Sampling variation can be reduced by taking duplicate, independent samples. True variation can cause nutrient composition of diets to vary between days. However, current data do not show any substantial negative effects when diets vary day to day if when averaged over a few days, nutrient composition meets diet specifications. Arguably, observer variation can be the greater problem. Observer variation may cause a nutritionist to change a diet when feed composition has not changed, or a diet might be formulated using feed data that are not representative, resulting in a poor diet.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Applications</h3><p>Typical amounts of true variation in feedstuffs when included in a well-made TMR may not cause significant problems with cows when the variation is centered around the correct mean. Sampling error can lead to poorly balanced diets. To reduce that risk, diet formulation should use the mean of at least 2 duplicate independent samples of the ingredients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 5","pages":"Pages 608-618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000934/pdf?md5=7c3cbed86e3a060328e0a7053db3f07c&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000934-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142244112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationships between individual animal variation in dry matter intake and animal performance and feed efficiency of finishing beef cattle 育成肉牛干物质摄入量的动物个体差异与动物性能和饲料效率之间的关系
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02583
M.R. Beck , V.N. Gouvêa , J.K. Smith , J.A. Proctor , P.A. Beck , A.P. Foote

Objective

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the relationship between 2 measures of daily individual animal variation in DMI with measures of overall DMI, ADG, carcass traits, and feed efficiency of finishing beef cattle.

Materials and Methods

Daily DMI data were collated from 3 previously published experiments within which beef cattle were individually fed using a Calan gate system (American Calan, Northwood, NH) or an Insentec Roughage Intake Control system (Hokofarm Group, Emmeloord, the Netherlands). The day-to-day CV for DMI of each animal was calculated. Next, the average Euclidian distance (ED) was calculated. The Pearson’s (rp) and Spearman’s (rs) correlations between CV and ED methods and production traits and efficiency indexes were calculated.

Results and Discussion

The CV was inversely correlated with DMI (rp = −0.65; rs = −0.59), ADG (rp = −0.52; rs = −0.52), and residual feed intake (rp = −0.41; rs = −0.35) and positively correlated with residual intake and gain (rp = 0.29; rs = 0.25). The CV was negatively correlated with hot carcass weight (HCW; rp = −0.46; rs = −0.45), back fat thickness (rp = −0.25; rs = −0.31), yield grade (rp = −0.29; rs = −0.31), and calculated empty body fat (rp = −0.30; rs = −0.32). The ED was negatively correlated with ADG (rp = −0.55; rs = −0.61), G:F (rp = −0.49; rs = −0.50), residual ADG (rp = −0.57; rs = −0.56), and HCW (rp = −0.33; rs = −0.39).

Implications and Applications

The 2 measures of DMI variation appear to divergently explain variation in DMI and the relationship with production traits and feed efficiency. However, cattle with more improved production outcomes were associated with less day-to-day variation in DMI.

材料与方法从之前发表的 3 项实验中整理了每日 DMI 数据,在这些实验中,使用 Calan 门系统(American Calan,Northwood,NH)或 Insentec 粗饲料摄入控制系统(Hokofarm Group,Emmeloord,Netherlands)对肉牛进行单独饲喂。计算每头动物每日 DMI 的 CV 值。然后计算平均欧氏距离(ED)。计算了 CV 和 ED 方法与生产性状和效率指数之间的皮尔逊(rp)和斯皮尔曼(rs)相关性。65;rs = -0.59)、ADG(rp = -0.52;rs = -0.52)和剩余采食量(rp = -0.41;rs = -0.35)呈反相关,而与剩余采食量和增重(rp = 0.29;rs = 0.25)呈正相关。CV与热胴体重(HCW;rp = -0.46;rs = -0.45)、背脂厚度(rp = -0.25;rs = -0.31)、产量等级(rp = -0.29;rs = -0.31)和计算的空体脂肪(rp = -0.30;rs = -0.32)呈负相关。ED与ADG (rp = -0.55; rs = -0.61)、G:F (rp = -0.49; rs = -0.50)、残余ADG (rp = -0.57; rs = -0.56)和HCW (rp = -0.33; rs = -0.39)呈负相关。然而,生产结果改善较多的牛的 DMI 日变化较小。
{"title":"Relationships between individual animal variation in dry matter intake and animal performance and feed efficiency of finishing beef cattle","authors":"M.R. Beck ,&nbsp;V.N. Gouvêa ,&nbsp;J.K. Smith ,&nbsp;J.A. Proctor ,&nbsp;P.A. Beck ,&nbsp;A.P. Foote","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02583","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02583","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the relationship between 2 measures of daily individual animal variation in DMI with measures of overall DMI, ADG, carcass traits, and feed efficiency of finishing beef cattle.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Daily DMI data were collated from 3 previously published experiments within which beef cattle were individually fed using a Calan gate system (American Calan, Northwood, NH) or an Insentec Roughage Intake Control system (Hokofarm Group, Emmeloord, the Netherlands). The day-to-day CV for DMI of each animal was calculated. Next, the average Euclidian distance (ED) was calculated. The Pearson’s (rp) and Spearman’s (rs) correlations between CV and ED methods and production traits and efficiency indexes were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>The CV was inversely correlated with DMI (rp = −0.65; rs = −0.59), ADG (rp = −0.52; rs = −0.52), and residual feed intake (rp = −0.41; rs = −0.35) and positively correlated with residual intake and gain (rp = 0.29; rs = 0.25). The CV was negatively correlated with hot carcass weight (HCW; rp = −0.46; rs = −0.45), back fat thickness (rp = −0.25; rs = −0.31), yield grade (rp = −0.29; rs = −0.31), and calculated empty body fat (rp = −0.30; rs = −0.32). The ED was negatively correlated with ADG (rp = −0.55; rs = −0.61), G:F (rp = −0.49; rs = −0.50), residual ADG (rp = −0.57; rs = −0.56), and HCW (rp = −0.33; rs = −0.39).</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>The 2 measures of DMI variation appear to divergently explain variation in DMI and the relationship with production traits and feed efficiency. However, cattle with more improved production outcomes were associated with less day-to-day variation in DMI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 5","pages":"Pages 639-646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400096X/pdf?md5=de92ae1ab2b9d8948e2322a69735147a&pid=1-s2.0-S259028652400096X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142244189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Call for Submissions 征集作品
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00107-1
{"title":"Call for Submissions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00107-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00107-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 5","pages":"Pages iv-vi"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524001071/pdfft?md5=be67d9c2fc971e822e16281975c72328&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524001071-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Call for Submissions 征集作品
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00090-9
{"title":"Call for Submissions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00090-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00090-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Pages iv-vi"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000909/pdfft?md5=4a413c79c891007c42526c880829d9af&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000909-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141952109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying and quantifying key sustainability indicators for pastoral dairy-beef production systems 确定和量化牧区奶牛生产系统的关键可持续性指标
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2023-02529
M. Kearney , E.G. O’Riordan , C.J. Byrne , J. Breen , P. Crosson

Objective

The objective of this study was to quantify the sustainability of representative dairy-beef farms in Ireland (AVE) and to compare these with dairy-beef farms participating in a farm improvement program (IMP) and research (RES) systems. The study aimed to determine the differences in technical performance and key sustainability indicators among these farm categories.

Material and Methods

Within each farm category, dairy-beef systems differing in sire breed (early maturing, late maturing, and Holstein-Friesian), animal sex (steer and heifer), finishing age (ranging from 18 to 30 mo of age), and production system (finishing from grazing or indoor-based systems) were modeled using the Grange Dairy-Beef Systems Model.

Results and Discussion

The average finishing age was 25.4, 23.8, and 20.6 mo on AVE, IMP, and RES, respectively. Results highlighted a wide range in net margins (from €185 to €806 per hectare; €1 = $1.05) for the systems modeled. Sex had the largest effect on profitability (steer greater than heifer), followed by finishing system (finishing from grazing systems greater than indoor systems) and breed type (late maturing greatest and Holstein-Friesian least). Greenhouse gas emissions of the 3 farm categories ranged from 10.8 to 16.6 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2eq) per kilogram of carcass weight produced. All farm categories were, on average, net producers of human-edible protein, and all farms were net consumers of human-edible energy.

Implications and Applications

Key sustainability performance indicators identified in this study include carcass output per hectare, reduced age at slaughter, high individual animal performance, and increasing of the proportion of grazed pasture in the animal’s diet. There is a temporal dimension to ranking farm categories from an economic, environment, labor, feed-food competition, and land-use perspective because none of the 3 farm categories investigated were without fault from a sustainable dairy- beef production perspective.

目标本研究旨在量化爱尔兰(AVE)具有代表性的奶牛场的可持续性,并将其与参与农场改良计划(IMP)和研究(RES)系统的奶牛场进行比较。研究旨在确定这些农场类别在技术性能和关键可持续性指标方面的差异。材料与方法在每个农场类别中,使用格兰奇乳牛系统模型对不同母牛品种(早熟、晚熟和荷斯坦-弗里斯兰)、动物性别(公牛和母牛)、育成年龄(18 到 30 月龄)和生产系统(放牧育成或室内育成)的乳牛系统进行建模。结果与讨论AVE、IMP 和 RES 的平均育成年龄分别为 25.4、23.8 和 20.6 月龄。结果表明,建模系统的净利润范围很广(从每公顷 185 欧元到 806 欧元;1 欧元 = 1.05 美元)。性别对盈利能力的影响最大(公牛大于母牛),其次是育成系统(放牧育成系统大于室内育成系统)和品种类型(晚熟牛最大,荷斯坦-弗里斯兰牛最小)。三类农场每生产一公斤胴体重量的温室气体排放量在 10.8 至 16.6 千克二氧化碳当量 (CO2eq) 之间。本研究确定的主要可持续发展绩效指标包括每公顷胴体产量、屠宰日龄降低、动物个体性能高以及动物日粮中牧草比例增加。从经济、环境、劳动力、饲料-食品竞争和土地利用的角度对农场类别进行排序具有时间维度,因为从可持续奶牛-牛肉生产的角度来看,所调查的 3 个农场类别中没有一个是无懈可击的。
{"title":"Identifying and quantifying key sustainability indicators for pastoral dairy-beef production systems","authors":"M. Kearney ,&nbsp;E.G. O’Riordan ,&nbsp;C.J. Byrne ,&nbsp;J. Breen ,&nbsp;P. Crosson","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02529","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2023-02529","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to quantify the sustainability of representative dairy-beef farms in Ireland (AVE) and to compare these with dairy-beef farms participating in a farm improvement program (IMP) and research (RES) systems. The study aimed to determine the differences in technical performance and key sustainability indicators among these farm categories.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>Within each farm category, dairy-beef systems differing in sire breed (early maturing, late maturing, and Holstein-Friesian), animal sex (steer and heifer), finishing age (ranging from 18 to 30 mo of age), and production system (finishing from grazing or indoor-based systems) were modeled using the Grange Dairy-Beef Systems Model.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>The average finishing age was 25.4, 23.8, and 20.6 mo on AVE, IMP, and RES, respectively. Results highlighted a wide range in net margins (from €185 to €806 per hectare; €1 = $1.05) for the systems modeled. Sex had the largest effect on profitability (steer greater than heifer), followed by finishing system (finishing from grazing systems greater than indoor systems) and breed type (late maturing greatest and Holstein-Friesian least). Greenhouse gas emissions of the 3 farm categories ranged from 10.8 to 16.6 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub>eq) per kilogram of carcass weight produced. All farm categories were, on average, net producers of human-edible protein, and all farms were net consumers of human-edible energy.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Key sustainability performance indicators identified in this study include carcass output per hectare, reduced age at slaughter, high individual animal performance, and increasing of the proportion of grazed pasture in the animal’s diet. There is a temporal dimension to ranking farm categories from an economic, environment, labor, feed-food competition, and land-use perspective because none of the 3 farm categories investigated were without fault from a sustainable dairy- beef production perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Pages 570-590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000855/pdf?md5=14d0da866f16c827dec6117876198353&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000855-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141962225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of the degree of steam flaking of corn and concentration of dietary wet distillers grains on energy metabolism of feedlot cattle* 玉米蒸汽压片程度和日粮湿蒸馏谷物浓度对饲养场牛能量代谢的影响*
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02546
Christian H. Ponce , N. Andy Cole , Beverly E. Meyer , Jenny J. Jennings , Mike S. Brown

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of degree of steam flaking of corn (SFC) on energy metabolism of finishing cattle fed diets containing wet distillers grains with solubles (WDGS).

Materials and Methods

Crossbred steers (n = 4; initial BW = 308 ± 7.0 kg) were randomly assigned to 4 diets containing 0% or 20% WDGS and corn steam flaked to either 321 or 270 g/L bulk density (26 or 22 lb/bu, respectively) in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Energy metabolism was measured in respiration chambers with a 4 × 4 Latin square design.

Results and Discussion

There were no interactions between WDGS concentration and SFC bulk density for nutrient digestion, nitrogen metabolism, or energy metabolism values. Digestibility of OM, NDF, and ether extract were not influenced by the degree of steam flaking of corn. Decreasing bulk density of SFC increased starch digestion, tended to increase the ratio of DE to digestible OM, and numerically decreased the plasma urea-N concentration, but did not significantly affect ME concentration or the DE:TDN ratio. Replacing SFC with 20% WDGS decreased fat digestion but did not affect digestion of other nutrients or dietary energy values.

Implications and Applications

Results suggest that increasing the degree of steam flaking of corn to less than 321 g/L does not improve diet digestibility or energy metabolism of cattle fed diets containing 0% or 20% WDGS.

材料和方法将杂交阉牛(n = 4;初始体重 = 308 ± 7.0 kg)随机分配到含有 0% 或 20% WDGS 和玉米蒸汽压片至 321 或 270 g/L 堆积密度(分别为 26 或 22 lb/bu)的 4 种日粮中,采用 2 × 2 因子排列。结果与讨论WDGS浓度与SFC容重之间对营养物质消化、氮代谢或能量代谢值没有交互作用。OM、NDF和乙醚提取物的消化率不受玉米蒸汽压片程度的影响。降低 SFC 的体积密度可增加淀粉消化率,提高 DE 与可消化 OM 的比率,并在数值上降低血浆尿素氮浓度,但对 ME 浓度或 DE:TDN 比率没有显著影响。用 20% 的 WDGS 代替 SFC 会降低脂肪的消化率,但不会影响其他营养物质的消化率或日粮能量值。 结果表明,将玉米的蒸汽压片度提高到低于 321 克/升并不能改善牛的日粮消化率或能量代谢,饲喂含 0% 或 20% WDGS 的日粮。
{"title":"Effects of the degree of steam flaking of corn and concentration of dietary wet distillers grains on energy metabolism of feedlot cattle*","authors":"Christian H. Ponce ,&nbsp;N. Andy Cole ,&nbsp;Beverly E. Meyer ,&nbsp;Jenny J. Jennings ,&nbsp;Mike S. Brown","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02546","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02546","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine the effects of degree of steam flaking of corn (SFC) on energy metabolism of finishing cattle fed diets containing wet distillers grains with solubles (WDGS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Crossbred steers (n = 4; initial BW = 308 ± 7.0 kg) were randomly assigned to 4 diets containing 0% or 20% WDGS and corn steam flaked to either 321 or 270 g/L bulk density (26 or 22 lb/bu, respectively) in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Energy metabolism was measured in respiration chambers with a 4 × 4 Latin square design.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>There were no interactions between WDGS concentration and SFC bulk density for nutrient digestion, nitrogen metabolism, or energy metabolism values. Digestibility of OM, NDF, and ether extract were not influenced by the degree of steam flaking of corn. Decreasing bulk density of SFC increased starch digestion, tended to increase the ratio of DE to digestible OM, and numerically decreased the plasma urea-N concentration, but did not significantly affect ME concentration or the DE:TDN ratio. Replacing SFC with 20% WDGS decreased fat digestion but did not affect digestion of other nutrients or dietary energy values.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Results suggest that increasing the degree of steam flaking of corn to less than 321 g/L does not improve diet digestibility or energy metabolism of cattle fed diets containing 0% or 20% WDGS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Pages 511-525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400079X/pdf?md5=49e43357012de87caf1a6d8853ddc00b&pid=1-s2.0-S259028652400079X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141952098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of dual-purpose wheat varieties in the Southeast United States 美国东南部两用小麦品种评估
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2023-02450
M.H. West , W.B. Smith , M.K. Mullenix , A.N. Rabinowitz , S.L. Dillard

Objective

Dual-purpose wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) systems are commonly used in the Great Plains of the United States but are not often used in the Southeast. This study aimed to evaluate the viability of dual-purpose wheat management in the Southeast.

Materials and Methods

Wheat varieties evaluated were generic feed type (unknown variety blend, Feed), seed type GA Gore (Seed), and 2 forage types, AGS 2024 (AGS) and Pioneer 26R41 (Pioneer). The experiment was a randomized complete block design (n = 4) conducted during the winters of 2021 and 2022. Three grazing frequencies were used: an ungrazed control (NG) and low-frequency (LF) or high-frequency (HF) grazing. Low- frequency plots received monthly grazing in January and February, whereas HF treatments received a third grazing in March. Destructive forage sampling occurred at monthly intervals. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS (v. 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with differences declared at P < 0.05. Ad hoc economic evaluation was performed for establishment costs and potential net returns.

Results and Discussion

Before grazing, AGS herbage mass (2,660 kg/ha) was greater than all other varieties. Compared with all other varieties, AGS had greater ADF (24.9%) and least TDN (72.5%). Across grazing frequencies, Pioneer had greater final grain yield (3,620 kg DM/ ha), with Seed having the least (1,270 kg DM/ha). Dual- purpose returns above costs were greatest for Pioneer.

Implications and Applications

Results indicate that common southeastern wheat varieties can be successfully used in a dual-purpose management system.

目的两用小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)系统通常用于美国大平原地区,但在东南部地区并不常用。本研究旨在评估东南部地区两用小麦管理的可行性。材料与方法评估的小麦品种有一般饲料型(未知品种混合物,饲料)、种子型 GA Gore(种子)和 2 种饲草型 AGS 2024(AGS)和 Pioneer 26R41(先锋)。试验采用随机完全区组设计(n = 4),在 2021 年和 2022 年冬季进行。采用了三种放牧频率:未放牧对照(NG)、低频(LF)或高频(HF)放牧。低频地块在一月和二月每月放牧一次,而高频地块则在三月进行第三次放牧。破坏性牧草采样每月进行一次。数据采用 SAS 的 PROC GLIMMIX(9.4 版,SAS Institute Inc.对种植成本和潜在净收益进行了特别经济评价。 结果与讨论放牧前,AGS 的牧草质量(2,660 千克/公顷)高于所有其他品种。与所有其他品种相比,AGS 的 ADF(24.9%)更高,TDN(72.5%)最低。在不同放牧频率下,先锋的最终谷物产量更高(3620 千克 DM/公顷),种子的产量最低(1270 千克 DM/公顷)。结果表明,普通的东南部小麦品种可以成功地用于两用管理系统。
{"title":"Evaluation of dual-purpose wheat varieties in the Southeast United States","authors":"M.H. West ,&nbsp;W.B. Smith ,&nbsp;M.K. Mullenix ,&nbsp;A.N. Rabinowitz ,&nbsp;S.L. Dillard","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02450","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2023-02450","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Dual-purpose wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.) systems are commonly used in the Great Plains of the United States but are not often used in the Southeast. This study aimed to evaluate the viability of dual-purpose wheat management in the Southeast.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Wheat varieties evaluated were generic feed type (unknown variety blend, Feed), seed type GA Gore (Seed), and 2 forage types, AGS 2024 (AGS) and Pioneer 26R41 (Pioneer). The experiment was a randomized complete block design (n = 4) conducted during the winters of 2021 and 2022. Three grazing frequencies were used: an ungrazed control (NG) and low-frequency (LF) or high-frequency (HF) grazing. Low- frequency plots received monthly grazing in January and February, whereas HF treatments received a third grazing in March. Destructive forage sampling occurred at monthly intervals. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS (v. 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with differences declared at <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05. Ad hoc economic evaluation was performed for establishment costs and potential net returns.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Before grazing, AGS herbage mass (2,660 kg/ha) was greater than all other varieties. Compared with all other varieties, AGS had greater ADF (24.9%) and least TDN (72.5%). Across grazing frequencies, Pioneer had greater final grain yield (3,620 kg DM/ ha), with Seed having the least (1,270 kg DM/ha). Dual- purpose returns above costs were greatest for Pioneer.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Results indicate that common southeastern wheat varieties can be successfully used in a dual-purpose management system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Pages 446-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000739/pdf?md5=7819806e9a426fc44125fe47d8c2d2f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000739-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141962211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Producer perceptions of US livestock indemnity policy 生产者对美国牲畜补偿政策的看法
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02543
Victoria L. Campbell , Jada M. Thompson , Jenny L. Apriesnig , Glynn T. Tonsor , Dustin L. Pendell

Objective

Livestock disease management is crucial for producers. To control and eradicate disease, the US gov- ernment has a duty to depopulate infected or potentially infected animals, and current indemnity policy dictates that producers must receive fair market compensation for depopulated animals. This study surveys producers’ pref- erences regarding livestock indemnity policy to better un- derstand ordered preferences for any changes in the future.

Materials and Methods

Through a ranked-ordered probit model, we analyzed producers’ rankings of 4 dif- ferent types of indemnity from an online producer survey.

Results and Discussion

Based on the responding producers, the most preferred method of livestock indem- nity is fair market value for the animal, and the second most preferred indemnity policy is government-subsidized livestock insurance.

Implications and Applications

The results indicate heterogeneity in preference rankings across producers and by producer characteristics. Our findings provide policy- makers with information on producers’ opinions for com- pensation after a disease outbreak. These insights allow legislators to consider producers’ preferences when updat- ing or creating new policies regarding livestock disease management in the future.

目标牲畜疾病管理对生产者至关重要。为了控制和根除疾病,美国政府有责任扑杀受感染或可能受感染的牲畜,而现行的补偿政策规定,生产者必须为扑杀的牲畜获得公平的市场补偿。本研究调查了生产者对牲畜补偿政策的偏好,以更好地了解他们对未来任何变化的有序偏好。材料与方法我们通过排序-排序 probit 模型,分析了生产者在线调查中对 4 种不同类型补偿的排序。结果与讨论根据受访生产者的情况,最受欢迎的牲畜补偿方式是牲畜的公平市场价值,第二受欢迎的补偿政策是政府补贴的牲畜保险。我们的研究结果为政策制定者提供了有关生产者在疾病爆发后对赔偿意见的信息。这些见解有助于立法者在未来更新或制定有关牲畜疾病管理的新政策时考虑生产者的偏好。
{"title":"Producer perceptions of US livestock indemnity policy","authors":"Victoria L. Campbell ,&nbsp;Jada M. Thompson ,&nbsp;Jenny L. Apriesnig ,&nbsp;Glynn T. Tonsor ,&nbsp;Dustin L. Pendell","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02543","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02543","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Livestock disease management is crucial for producers. To control and eradicate disease, the US gov- ernment has a duty to depopulate infected or potentially infected animals, and current indemnity policy dictates that producers must receive fair market compensation for depopulated animals. This study surveys producers’ pref- erences regarding livestock indemnity policy to better un- derstand ordered preferences for any changes in the future.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Through a ranked-ordered probit model, we analyzed producers’ rankings of 4 dif- ferent types of indemnity from an online producer survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Based on the responding producers, the most preferred method of livestock indem- nity is fair market value for the animal, and the second most preferred indemnity policy is government-subsidized livestock insurance.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>The results indicate heterogeneity in preference rankings across producers and by producer characteristics. Our findings provide policy- makers with information on producers’ opinions for com- pensation after a disease outbreak. These insights allow legislators to consider producers’ preferences when updat- ing or creating new policies regarding livestock disease management in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Pages 542-548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400082X/pdf?md5=fb07e4a5ca0207062598d791b93a5a97&pid=1-s2.0-S259028652400082X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141962214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of Brix for predicting sugar concentrations of alfalfa and orchardgrass* 验证 Brix 预测紫花苜蓿和果园草糖浓度的方法*
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02552
Eric D. Billman , Kathy J. Soder , Jeff Horst , Aimee Hafla , Kristi Balk

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of Brix in predicting sugar concentrations in fresh alfalfa (ALF; Medicago sativa L.) and orchardgrass (OG; Dactylis glomerata L.) forages to be used as an inexpensive and rapid field-level assessment of relative energy in forages.

Materials and Methods

In a 2-yr study, fresh forages samples from ALF and OG monoculture pastures in central Pennsylvania, USA, were collected once monthly from May to September. Samples were immediately evaluated for Brix values with a hand-held digital refractometer, and the remaining biomass was frozen immediately with liquid N to halt cellular respiration. Samples were lyophilized and analyzed for individual sugars and wet chemistry nutritive analyses.

Results and Discussion

Brix was positively correlated with total and individual sugars in ALF during late spring and late summer (0.53–0.93), but correlations were nonexistent or negative in mid-summer. However, Brix values did not correlate with any notable sugar parameters in OG beyond the first sampling date. These findings were attributed to greater fibrous fraction contamination, lower sugar concentrations found in grasses and legumes compared with horticultural crops, and changes in seasonal growth of ALF and OG.

Implications and Applications

Brix values did not consistently predict sugar concentrations in fresh ALF and OG forages. Because Brix measures dissolved solids in solution (not just sugars), Brix readings collected from crushed ALF or OG samples may be confounded by fibrous fractions found in the solution. Brix accuracy may also be dependent on seasonal temperature patterns, plant growth stage, and daily weather patterns. Other solutions should be investigated that rapidly assess sugar profiles and nutritive values of fresh forages.

本研究的目的是评估 Brix 预测新鲜紫花苜蓿(ALF;Medicago sativa L.)和果园草(OG;Dactylis glomerata L.)牧草中糖浓度的准确性,以用作牧草中相对能量的一种廉价、快速的田间评估方法。立即用手持式数字折射仪评估样品的 Brix 值,并立即用液态氮冷冻剩余的生物质以停止细胞呼吸。结果与讨论在春末和夏末,ALF 的 Brix 值与总糖和单糖呈正相关(0.53-0.93),但在仲夏则不相关或呈负相关。然而,在第一个采样日期之后,Brix 值与 OG 中任何显著的糖分参数都不相关。这些发现归因于纤维部分污染较多、禾本科和豆科植物的糖分浓度低于园艺作物,以及 ALF 和 OG 的季节性生长变化。由于 Brix 测量的是溶液中的溶解固体(而不仅仅是糖),因此从压碎的 ALF 或 OG 样品中收集的 Brix 读数可能会受到溶液中纤维成分的干扰。Brix 的准确性还可能取决于季节性温度模式、植物生长阶段和日常天气模式。应研究其他能快速评估新鲜牧草糖度和营养价值的解决方案。
{"title":"Validation of Brix for predicting sugar concentrations of alfalfa and orchardgrass*","authors":"Eric D. Billman ,&nbsp;Kathy J. Soder ,&nbsp;Jeff Horst ,&nbsp;Aimee Hafla ,&nbsp;Kristi Balk","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02552","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of Brix in predicting sugar concentrations in fresh alfalfa (ALF; <em>Medicago sativa</em> L.) and orchardgrass (OG; <em>Dactylis glomerata</em> L.) forages to be used as an inexpensive and rapid field-level assessment of relative energy in forages.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>In a 2-yr study, fresh forages samples from ALF and OG monoculture pastures in central Pennsylvania, USA, were collected once monthly from May to September. Samples were immediately evaluated for Brix values with a hand-held digital refractometer, and the remaining biomass was frozen immediately with liquid N to halt cellular respiration. Samples were lyophilized and analyzed for individual sugars and wet chemistry nutritive analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Brix was positively correlated with total and individual sugars in ALF during late spring and late summer (0.53–0.93), but correlations were nonexistent or negative in mid-summer. However, Brix values did not correlate with any notable sugar parameters in OG beyond the first sampling date. These findings were attributed to greater fibrous fraction contamination, lower sugar concentrations found in grasses and legumes compared with horticultural crops, and changes in seasonal growth of ALF and OG.</p><p><strong>Implications and Applications</strong></p><p>Brix values did not consistently predict sugar concentrations in fresh ALF and OG forages. Because Brix measures dissolved solids in solution (not just sugars), Brix readings collected from crushed ALF or OG samples may be confounded by fibrous fractions found in the solution. Brix accuracy may also be dependent on seasonal temperature patterns, plant growth stage, and daily weather patterns. Other solutions should be investigated that rapidly assess sugar profiles and nutritive values of fresh forages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Pages 437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000727/pdf?md5=145fd675dfac50d569a8dd49fa7ddbce&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000727-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141962213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"August" Cover "八月 "封面
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00086-7
{"title":"\"August\" Cover","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00086-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2590-2865(24)00086-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Page OFC"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000867/pdfft?md5=81c106185b5369f9911e578b8c252aaa&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000867-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141952106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Applied Animal Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1