首页 > 最新文献

Applied Animal Science最新文献

英文 中文
Call for Submissions 征集意见书
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.1016/S2590-2865(25)00066-7
{"title":"Call for Submissions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2590-2865(25)00066-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2590-2865(25)00066-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages iv-vi"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"August" Cover “八月”封面
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.1016/S2590-2865(25)00062-X
{"title":"\"August\" Cover","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2590-2865(25)00062-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2590-2865(25)00062-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Page OFC"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using wet distillers grains placed on the ground as a late-season protein supplement for grazing stocker steers and subsequent effects on finishing performance and carcass characteristics 将湿酒糟放在地上作为放牧牛的后期蛋白质补充及其对肥育性能和胴体特性的影响
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02573
Keith R. Harmoney , John R. Jaeger

Objective

Stocker cattle gains on western Great Plains rangelands are characterized by lower gains during late summer compared with early summer, and thus may also limit rancher use of stocker cattle to diversify livestock classes as a drought mitigation strategy. Our objective was to measure and compare late-summer stocker cattle gains after feeding a protein supplement (on the ground or in a bunk) to a nonsupplemented control.

Materials and Methods

Eighty steers (initial BW ± SD = 267 ± 22 kg/head) were stocked on 8 pastures (10 steers/pasture) each year from May to October for 4 yr. Two replications of 4 treatments, including (1) wet distillers grains fed in a bunk, (2) wet distillers grains fed on the ground on standing vegetation, (3) a 1:1 mixture of milo: soybean meal fed in a bunk, and (4) a control treatment of no supplement, were compared during a late-summer stocker steer grazing trial. Supplements were fed 3 times per week to supply CP at 0.14 kg/d per steer during the last half (77 d) of the growing season, mid-July to early October. Steers were weighed in May, mid-July, and October on pasture, and at the end of a feedlot finishing phase.

Results and Discussion

During the last half of the grazing season in 2011 to 2014, animal daily gains were greater for supplemented groups compared with the nonsupplemented control group (0.77 to 0.81 kg/head per day vs. 0.70 kg/head per day, supplemented vs. nonsupplemented, respectively). Gains on pasture from supplemented groups, including the wet distillers group fed on the ground, were not different from each other. Animals not supplemented on pasture had similar gain during the finishing phase in the feedlot compared with animals supplemented on pasture (235.9 kg/head vs. 229.7 kg/head).

Implications and Applications

Late-season protein supplementation with wet distillers grains, even in small quantities, would benefit stocker cattle gain during most years in this region, whether the supplement is placed on the ground or in a bunk. Any residual amount of distillers supplement that may be remaining on the soil appears to be inconsequential to animal gain. Lack of protein supplement limits stocker animal gains during the late grazing season in western Great Plains rangelands.
目的大平原西部牧场放牧牛的收益特点是夏末与初夏相比收益较低,因此也可能限制牧场主将放牧牛作为一种缓解干旱的策略,使牲畜种类多样化。我们的目标是测量和比较夏末牲畜在饲喂蛋白质补充剂(在地上或在床上)和未添加蛋白质补充剂的对照后的增益。材料和MethodsEighty引导(初始BW±SD = 267±22公斤/头)储存在8牧场(10引导/牧场)每年5月至10月4 4年。两个复制的治疗方法,包括(1)湿蒸馏器谷物在铺位上,(2)湿蒸馏器谷物美联储在站在地上植被、(3)1:1的混合物米洛:大豆粉在铺位上,和(4)控制治疗的补充,在夏的菜牛放牧试验比较。在生长季的后半期(7月中旬至10月上旬),每周补饲3次,以每头牛0.14 kg/d的速度提供CP。在5月、7月中旬和10月的牧场和饲养场育肥阶段结束时称重。结果与讨论在2011年至2014年的放牧季节后半段,与未添加对照组相比,添加组的动物日增重更高(分别为0.77至0.81 kg/头/天,添加组与未添加组分别为0.70 kg/头/天)。各补充组(包括地面饲养的湿蒸馏器组)在牧草上的收益差异不大。在育肥期,未补饲的动物与补饲的动物相比增重相似(235.9 kg/头vs 229.7 kg/头)。启示和应用在该地区,无论将湿酒糟补充蛋白质,即使是少量的,在大多数年份都有利于牲畜的增重,无论补充物是放在地上还是放在床上。任何残留在土壤上的酒糟添加剂对动物的增重似乎都是无关紧要的。在西部大平原牧场放牧季节后期,缺乏蛋白质补充限制了牲畜的收获。
{"title":"Using wet distillers grains placed on the ground as a late-season protein supplement for grazing stocker steers and subsequent effects on finishing performance and carcass characteristics","authors":"Keith R. Harmoney ,&nbsp;John R. Jaeger","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02573","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02573","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Stocker cattle gains on western Great Plains rangelands are characterized by lower gains during late summer compared with early summer, and thus may also limit rancher use of stocker cattle to diversify livestock classes as a drought mitigation strategy. Our objective was to measure and compare late-summer stocker cattle gains after feeding a protein supplement (on the ground or in a bunk) to a nonsupplemented control.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Eighty steers (initial BW ± SD = 267 ± 22 kg/head) were stocked on 8 pastures (10 steers/pasture) each year from May to October for 4 yr. Two replications of 4 treatments, including (1) wet distillers grains fed in a bunk, (2) wet distillers grains fed on the ground on standing vegetation, (3) a 1:1 mixture of milo: soybean meal fed in a bunk, and (4) a control treatment of no supplement, were compared during a late-summer stocker steer grazing trial. Supplements were fed 3 times per week to supply CP at 0.14 kg/d per steer during the last half (77 d) of the growing season, mid-July to early October. Steers were weighed in May, mid-July, and October on pasture, and at the end of a feedlot finishing phase.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>During the last half of the grazing season in 2011 to 2014, animal daily gains were greater for supplemented groups compared with the nonsupplemented control group (0.77 to 0.81 kg/head per day vs. 0.70 kg/head per day, supplemented vs. nonsupplemented, respectively). Gains on pasture from supplemented groups, including the wet distillers group fed on the ground, were not different from each other. Animals not supplemented on pasture had similar gain during the finishing phase in the feedlot compared with animals supplemented on pasture (235.9 kg/head vs. 229.7 kg/head).</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Late-season protein supplementation with wet distillers grains, even in small quantities, would benefit stocker cattle gain during most years in this region, whether the supplement is placed on the ground or in a bunk. Any residual amount of distillers supplement that may be remaining on the soil appears to be inconsequential to animal gain. Lack of protein supplement limits stocker animal gains during the late grazing season in western Great Plains rangelands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 319-328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspective and Commentary: Summary of the Special Issue on calf and stocker performance effects on feedlot performance and thoughts on future research 展望与评论:《犊牛和家畜生产性能对饲养场生产性能的影响》特刊综述及对未来研究的思考
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2025-02716
Daniel Rivera , Paul Beck

Purpose

The objective of this article was to summarize information in 7 original research articles and 2 reviews submitted, reviewed, and accepted for this Special Issue on possible preweaning calf and stocker calf performance factors influencing subsequent feedlot performance. Additionally, thoughts regarding future directions for research are presented.

Sources

A call for papers was released in early 2024 for topics that evaluated the effects of postweaning management on subsequent feedlot performance in beef cattle. Seven original research articles and 2 reviews were submitted.

Synthesis

This Special Issue represents research findings and reviews of information to expand our understanding of factors in the preweaning and stocker phases that might influence subsequent feedlot performance. Information is presented in the Health, Nutrition, and Production and Management sections. The segmented nature of the beef industry leads to segmented areas of research focused on the individual cow-calf, stocker, and feedlot segments. Thus, there is a dearth of consistent information examining long-term effects of pre- and postweaning treatments and factors across the various segments, including feedlot performance and carcass characteristics.

Conclusions and Applications

Our goal for this Special Issue was to identify and address some of the knowledge gaps. As noted in the 2 reviews, data regarding long-term effects needs to be collected in a more standardized and consistent way among various research locations. Although the research findings submitted to this Special Issue add to our body of knowledge, there are still many other avenues to explore. However, given the complexity of a system-type approach to fully explore these questions, it is imperative that researchers and Extension personnel collaborate (across state and regional lines) to find ways to address these needs.
目的总结本期特刊投稿、审稿和接受的7篇原创研究文章和2篇综述,探讨预断奶犊牛和后备犊牛生产性能可能的影响因素。此外,对未来的研究方向提出了思考。资料来源2024年初发布了一份论文征集,主题是评估断奶后管理对肉牛后续饲养场性能的影响。提交原创研究论文7篇,综述2篇。本特刊代表了研究成果和信息综述,以扩大我们对断奶前和饲养阶段可能影响随后饲养场性能的因素的理解。信息载于保健、营养和生产与管理部分。牛肉产业的细分性质导致了细分的研究领域,主要集中在个体小牛,牲畜和饲养场部分。因此,缺乏关于断奶前和断奶后处理的长期影响以及各部分因素(包括饲养场性能和胴体特征)的一致信息。结论和应用我们本期特刊的目标是识别和解决一些知识空白。正如在这两篇综述中所指出的,关于长期影响的数据需要在不同的研究地点以更标准化和一致的方式收集。虽然提交给本期特刊的研究成果增加了我们的知识体系,但仍有许多其他途径有待探索。然而,考虑到充分探索这些问题的系统类型方法的复杂性,研究人员和推广人员(跨州和区域线)合作寻找解决这些需求的方法势在必行。
{"title":"Perspective and Commentary: Summary of the Special Issue on calf and stocker performance effects on feedlot performance and thoughts on future research","authors":"Daniel Rivera ,&nbsp;Paul Beck","doi":"10.15232/aas.2025-02716","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2025-02716","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The objective of this article was to summarize information in 7 original research articles and 2 reviews submitted, reviewed, and accepted for this Special Issue on possible preweaning calf and stocker calf performance factors influencing subsequent feedlot performance. Additionally, thoughts regarding future directions for research are presented.</div></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><div>A call for papers was released in early 2024 for topics that evaluated the effects of postweaning management on subsequent feedlot performance in beef cattle. Seven original research articles and 2 reviews were submitted.</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis</h3><div>This Special Issue represents research findings and reviews of information to expand our understanding of factors in the preweaning and stocker phases that might influence subsequent feedlot performance. Information is presented in the Health, Nutrition, and Production and Management sections. The segmented nature of the beef industry leads to segmented areas of research focused on the individual cow-calf, stocker, and feedlot segments. Thus, there is a dearth of consistent information examining long-term effects of pre- and postweaning treatments and factors across the various segments, including feedlot performance and carcass characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Applications</h3><div>Our goal for this Special Issue was to identify and address some of the knowledge gaps. As noted in the 2 reviews, data regarding long-term effects needs to be collected in a more standardized and consistent way among various research locations. Although the research findings submitted to this Special Issue add to our body of knowledge, there are still many other avenues to explore. However, given the complexity of a system-type approach to fully explore these questions, it is imperative that researchers and Extension personnel collaborate (across state and regional lines) to find ways to address these needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 399-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Invited Review: Effects of management on performance of stocker cattle and subsequent feedlot performance: A review within Applied Animal Science 特邀评论:管理对家畜生产性能和随后的饲养场生产性能的影响:应用动物科学综述
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02663
M.A. Snider , M.S. Gadberry , J.D. Rivera

Purpose

The purpose of this review is to summarize relevant research from the journal Applied Animal Science (formerly known as The Professional Animal Scientist) between 1995 and 2024, that explores management practices and concepts as they relate to stocker calf performance and subsequent feedlot performance. A secondary objective of this review is to describe research trends and identify knowledge and research gaps within existing literature.

Sources

Sources for this article included peer-reviewed scientific literature obtained from the journal Applied Animal Science, formerly known as The Professional Animal Scientist. Literature used in this review included original research, short communications, technical notes, meta- analyses, and review articles between 1995 and 2024. A primary search excluded literature that were on species other than beef and dairy cattle. From there, a secondary search evaluated literature for inclusion if it contained the following key words: stocker, growing, grazing, yearling, grazing, backgrounding, cow-calf, feedlot(s), and finishing/finisher. Literature was excluded from this review if the study solely evaluated cow-calf or feedlot enterprises. Additionally, literature was excluded if there was not a stocker or grazing component to the study. Sources were further divided by the state or region in which the research was conducted to identify general production system locations and practices.

Synthesis

Stocker and feedlot phases of beef production systems are 2 crucial phases in the beef supply chain, with each phase serving distinct roles in the beef life cycle. Most weaned calves will go directly into stocker/backgrounding programs, thereby making stocker calf management critical. Stocker production management practices may vary based on numerous factors, such as climate, resource availability, and producer goals, potentially affecting subsequent feedlot performance.

Conclusions and Applications

Future research should focus on an all-encompassing systems approach, following calves from birth through the retail and marketing processes, and examine effects of health and technology integration.
本综述的目的是总结《应用动物科学》杂志(以前称为《专业动物科学家》)1995年至2024年间的相关研究,这些研究探讨了与犊牛生产性能和随后的饲养场生产性能相关的管理实践和概念。本综述的第二个目的是描述研究趋势,并确定现有文献中的知识和研究差距。本文的来源包括来自《应用动物科学》杂志(以前称为《专业动物科学家》)的同行评议的科学文献。本综述中使用的文献包括1995年至2024年间的原始研究、简短通讯、技术笔记、元分析和综述文章。初步检索排除了除牛肉和奶牛以外的其他物种的文献。在此基础上,二次检索评估文献是否包含以下关键词:家畜、生长、放牧、一岁、放牧、背景、小牛、饲养场和育肥畜。如果研究仅评估小牛或饲养场企业,则文献被排除在本综述之外。此外,如果研究中没有牲畜或放牧成分,则排除文献。来源进一步划分的国家或地区的研究进行,以确定一般生产系统的位置和做法。牛肉生产系统的畜栏和饲养场阶段是牛肉供应链中的两个关键阶段,每个阶段在牛肉生命周期中都扮演着不同的角色。大多数断奶小牛将直接进入畜栏/背景程序,因此使畜栏小牛管理至关重要。牲畜饲养场生产管理实践可能会因气候、资源可用性和生产者目标等多种因素而有所不同,这些因素可能会影响随后的饲养场绩效。结论和应用未来的研究应该集中在一个全面的系统方法上,跟踪小牛从出生到零售和营销过程,并检查健康和技术整合的影响。
{"title":"Invited Review: Effects of management on performance of stocker cattle and subsequent feedlot performance: A review within Applied Animal Science","authors":"M.A. Snider ,&nbsp;M.S. Gadberry ,&nbsp;J.D. Rivera","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02663","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02663","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this review is to summarize relevant research from the journal <em>Applied Animal Science</em> (formerly known as <em>The Professional Animal Scientist</em>) between 1995 and 2024, that explores management practices and concepts as they relate to stocker calf performance and subsequent feedlot performance. A secondary objective of this review is to describe research trends and identify knowledge and research gaps within existing literature.</div></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><div>Sources for this article included peer-reviewed scientific literature obtained from the journal <em>Applied Animal Science</em>, formerly known as <em>The Professional Animal Scientist</em>. Literature used in this review included original research, short communications, technical notes, meta- analyses, and review articles between 1995 and 2024. A primary search excluded literature that were on species other than beef and dairy cattle. From there, a secondary search evaluated literature for inclusion if it contained the following key words: stocker, growing, grazing, yearling, grazing, backgrounding, cow-calf, feedlot(s), and finishing/finisher. Literature was excluded from this review if the study solely evaluated cow-calf or feedlot enterprises. Additionally, literature was excluded if there was not a stocker or grazing component to the study. Sources were further divided by the state or region in which the research was conducted to identify general production system locations and practices.</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis</h3><div>Stocker and feedlot phases of beef production systems are 2 crucial phases in the beef supply chain, with each phase serving distinct roles in the beef life cycle. Most weaned calves will go directly into stocker/backgrounding programs, thereby making stocker calf management critical. Stocker production management practices may vary based on numerous factors, such as climate, resource availability, and producer goals, potentially affecting subsequent feedlot performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Applications</h3><div>Future research should focus on an all-encompassing systems approach, following calves from birth through the retail and marketing processes, and examine effects of health and technology integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 329-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of postweaning management of beef × dairy hybrid steers on performance, efficiency, and carcass characteristics 断奶后管理对牛×乳杂交阉牛生产性能、效率和胴体特性的影响
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02585
Ally Grote , Olivia Genther-Schroeder , Blake K. Wilson , Troy Wistuba , Paul Beck

Objective

Our objective was to determine the per- formance, efficiency, and carcass quality in beef × dairy crossbred steers that were either placed directly on feed following weaning (FIN) or following an average stocker grazing period of 217 d (GRW/FIN).

Materials and Methods

Beef × dairy hybrid steers (n = 475) from Land O’Lakes Calf Milk Research Facility (Gray Summit, MO) at 12 wk of age were transported to the Willard Sparks Beef Research Center (WSBRC; Still- water, OK) in groups (n = 8) of 57 to 72 steers. Steers in the first group to arrive were allocated to either GRW/FIN or FIN treatment by BW, previous treatment, and breed of sire for each finishing treatment. Subsequent groups were all assigned either to FIN or GRW/FIN finishing treatments. Paired groups of FIN and GRW/FIN with overlapping feeding dates were considered a random block (n = 4) for statistical analysis. At WSBRC, steers were sorted by BW within sire breed and preweaning treatment into pens of 4 to 5 steers each and finished to a targeted 1.3 cm backfat. Data were analyzed using the Mixed pro- cedure of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with pen within block as the experimental unit.

Results and Discussion

Steers in GRW/FIN had greater (P < 0.01) BW and hot carcass weight while re- quiring fewer (P < 0.01) days on feed compared with FIN steers but were 75 d older at harvest. Average daily gain and feed intake were greater but G:F was lesser (P < 0.01) for GRW/FIN. Steers in GRW/FIN had a greater (P ≤ 0.03) ribeye area, marbling score, and percentage of USDA High Choice and Prime carcasses and fewer USDA Select carcasses (P < 0.05) compared with FIN steers.

Implications and Applications

Grazing beef × dairy crossbred steers before finishing increased animal performance and improved carcass characteristics but also increased daily feed intake compared with calves placed directly on feed. Beef × dairy crossbred calves offer a viable alternative to straight-bred dairy calves, but it is necessary to determine proper management strategies for these calves.
我们的目的是确定断奶后直接饲喂或平均放牧期217 d (GRW/FIN)后直接饲喂牛乳杂交阉牛的生产性能、效率和胴体质量。材料与方法来自Land O 'Lakes小牛奶研究机构(Gray Summit, MO)的12周龄的牛乳杂交阉牛(n = 475)运往Willard Sparks牛肉研究中心(WSBRC;静止的水,好吧)在57到72头牛的组(n = 8)。第一组到达的阉牛根据体重、以前的处理和每个肥育处理的父系品种,被分配到GRW/FIN或FIN处理。后续各组均分为FIN或GRW/FIN育肥处理。将饲喂日期重叠的FIN和GRW/FIN配对组作为随机组(n = 4)进行统计分析。在WSBRC,根据母猪种内的体重和断奶前处理将阉牛分为4 - 5头的栏,并最终达到目标1.3厘米的背膘。数据分析采用SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC)的混合程序,以块内笔为实验单元。结果和讨论:GRW/FIN患者P <;0.01)体重和热胴体重,而对(P <;在收获时,它们比原鳍肉牛大75 d。平均日增重和采食量较大,但G:F较小(P <;GRW/FIN为0.01)。GRW/FIN组的肉牛肋眼面积、大理石纹评分、USDA优质和优质胴体比例较大(P≤0.03),USDA优质胴体比例较小(P <;0.05)。意义与应用育肥期前放牧牛乳杂交阉牛可提高动物生产性能,改善胴体特性,但与直接饲喂相比,日采食量也有所增加。牛乳杂交犊牛是替代纯种犊牛的可行选择,但有必要确定适当的管理策略。
{"title":"Effects of postweaning management of beef × dairy hybrid steers on performance, efficiency, and carcass characteristics","authors":"Ally Grote ,&nbsp;Olivia Genther-Schroeder ,&nbsp;Blake K. Wilson ,&nbsp;Troy Wistuba ,&nbsp;Paul Beck","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02585","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02585","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our objective was to determine the per- formance, efficiency, and carcass quality in beef × dairy crossbred steers that were either placed directly on feed following weaning (FIN) or following an average stocker grazing period of 217 d (GRW/FIN).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Beef × dairy hybrid steers (n = 475) from Land O’Lakes Calf Milk Research Facility (Gray Summit, MO) at 12 wk of age were transported to the Willard Sparks Beef Research Center (WSBRC; Still- water, OK) in groups (n = 8) of 57 to 72 steers. Steers in the first group to arrive were allocated to either GRW/FIN or FIN treatment by BW, previous treatment, and breed of sire for each finishing treatment. Subsequent groups were all assigned either to FIN or GRW/FIN finishing treatments. Paired groups of FIN and GRW/FIN with overlapping feeding dates were considered a random block (n = 4) for statistical analysis. At WSBRC, steers were sorted by BW within sire breed and preweaning treatment into pens of 4 to 5 steers each and finished to a targeted 1.3 cm backfat. Data were analyzed using the Mixed pro- cedure of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with pen within block as the experimental unit.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Steers in GRW/FIN had greater (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) BW and hot carcass weight while re- quiring fewer (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) days on feed compared with FIN steers but were 75 d older at harvest. Average daily gain and feed intake were greater but G:F was lesser (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for GRW/FIN. Steers in GRW/FIN had a greater (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.03) ribeye area, marbling score, and percentage of USDA High Choice and Prime carcasses and fewer USDA Select carcasses (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) compared with FIN steers.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Grazing beef × dairy crossbred steers before finishing increased animal performance and improved carcass characteristics but also increased daily feed intake compared with calves placed directly on feed. Beef × dairy crossbred calves offer a viable alternative to straight-bred dairy calves, but it is necessary to determine proper management strategies for these calves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 350-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of beef calf health status during receiving on subsequent performance during stocker and finishing phases of production* 接收期牛肉犊牛健康状况对后期备畜和育肥期生产性能的影响*
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02576
Paul Beck , Matt R. Beck , Daniel Rivera , Beth Kegley , Gerald Horn

Objective

The objective of this analysis was to de- termine the effects of purchasing cattle as steers or bulls and bovine respiratory disease (BRD) treatment of stocker calves during receiving on performance during subsequent stages of production.

Materials and Methods

This post hoc analysis used mixed steer and bull calves with full health data records (n = 1,965) from 9 experiments, steer calves with receiv- ing health data and subsequent grazing performance data (n = 2,032) from 10 experiments, and steer calves with receiving health data with subsequent grazing and fin- ishing performance data (n = 423) from 2 experiments. Data were analyzed as random effects or generalized linear mixed models with experiment as the random effect in the R software.

Results and Discussion

Calves received as intact bulls (n = 1,064) were 2.41-, 2.25-, 2.68-, or 2.94-times more likely to have a first, second, third, and fourth treat- ment, respectively, than calves that were received as steers (n = 901). Bulls were also 1.16-times more likely to have chronic morbidity and 2.27-times more likely to have BRD mortality than steers. As the number of BRD treatments increased, ADG during receiving decreased. This carried over for reduced BW during turnout on pasture and at the end of grazing. When steers were followed through finishing, increased number of BRD treatments during the stocker receiving period reduced BW at slaughter, hot car- cass weight, and marbling and increased the number of days on feed to achieve a calculated 28% empty body fat carcass (based on equations by Guiroy et al., 2001).

Implications and Applications

Bovine respiratory disease has long-term implications on performance, not only during the receiving period but also on BW and productivity following the stocker grazing phase and fin- ishing. We observed no compensatory gain on pasture or during finishing from reduced performance due to health issues in the receiving phase. Increased BRD morbidity and less favorable health outcomes for calves arriving as intact bulls would require at least a $0.50/kg discount for intact bulls for equivalent net returns to steers.
目的本分析的目的是确定作为阉牛或公牛购买的牛以及饲养小牛在接收期间的牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)治疗对后续生产阶段生产性能的影响。材料与方法本事后分析采用9个实验中具有完整健康数据记录的混合阉牛和公牛犊牛(n = 1965), 10个实验中获得健康数据和随后放牧性能数据的犊牛(n = 2032),以及2个实验中获得健康数据并随后放牧和肥育性能数据的犊牛(n = 423)。数据在R软件中以随机效应或广义线性混合模型分析,实验作为随机效应。结果和讨论小牛作为完整的公牛(n = 1,064)分别比小牛作为阉牛(n = 901)有2.41倍,2.25倍,2.68倍和2.94倍的可能性接受第一次,第二次,第三次和第四次治疗。公牛患慢性疾病的可能性是阉牛的1.16倍,BRD死亡率是阉牛的2.27倍。随着BRD处理次数的增加,接受期间的平均日增重降低。这在放牧期间和放牧结束时导致体重减少。在肥育期对阉牛进行跟踪研究时,在畜群接收期间增加BRD处理次数,可减少屠宰时的体重、热胎重和大理石纹,并增加饲喂天数,以达到计算的28%的胴体空脂(根据guroy等人,2001年的公式)。影响和应用牛呼吸道疾病不仅在接收期对生产性能有长期影响,而且在放牧期和育肥期对体重和生产力也有长期影响。我们观察到,由于接收阶段的健康问题导致的性能下降,在牧场或育肥期没有补偿性增益。对于以完整公牛出生的小牛来说,BRD发病率的增加和较差的健康结果至少需要每公斤0.50美元的折扣,才能给阉牛带来同等的净回报。
{"title":"Effects of beef calf health status during receiving on subsequent performance during stocker and finishing phases of production*","authors":"Paul Beck ,&nbsp;Matt R. Beck ,&nbsp;Daniel Rivera ,&nbsp;Beth Kegley ,&nbsp;Gerald Horn","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02576","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02576","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this analysis was to de- termine the effects of purchasing cattle as steers or bulls and bovine respiratory disease (BRD) treatment of stocker calves during receiving on performance during subsequent stages of production.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This post hoc analysis used mixed steer and bull calves with full health data records (n = 1,965) from 9 experiments, steer calves with receiv- ing health data and subsequent grazing performance data (n = 2,032) from 10 experiments, and steer calves with receiving health data with subsequent grazing and fin- ishing performance data (n = 423) from 2 experiments. Data were analyzed as random effects or generalized linear mixed models with experiment as the random effect in the R software.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Calves received as intact bulls (n = 1,064) were 2.41-, 2.25-, 2.68-, or 2.94-times more likely to have a first, second, third, and fourth treat- ment, respectively, than calves that were received as steers (n = 901). Bulls were also 1.16-times more likely to have chronic morbidity and 2.27-times more likely to have BRD mortality than steers. As the number of BRD treatments increased, ADG during receiving decreased. This carried over for reduced BW during turnout on pasture and at the end of grazing. When steers were followed through finishing, increased number of BRD treatments during the stocker receiving period reduced BW at slaughter, hot car- cass weight, and marbling and increased the number of days on feed to achieve a calculated 28% empty body fat carcass (based on equations by Guiroy et al., 2001).</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Bovine respiratory disease has long-term implications on performance, not only during the receiving period but also on BW and productivity following the stocker grazing phase and fin- ishing. We observed no compensatory gain on pasture or during finishing from reduced performance due to health issues in the receiving phase. Increased BRD morbidity and less favorable health outcomes for calves arriving as intact bulls would require at least a $0.50/kg discount for intact bulls for equivalent net returns to steers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 284-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plane of nutrition through 92 days of age in beef × dairy hybrid steers influences subsequent finishing performance, feed efficiency, and carcass characteristics 92日龄的牛乳杂交阉牛营养水平影响后期肥育性能、饲料效率和胴体特性
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02607
Ally Grote , Olivia Genther-Schroeder , Blake K. Wilson , Troy Wistuba , Paul Beck

Objective

Our objective was to determine the effect of plane of nutrition through 92 d of age on subsequent finishing performance, feed efficiency, and carcass characteristics in beef × dairy crossbred steers.

Materials and Methods

Beef × dairy crossbred steers (n = 109) were acquired from commercial dairies in blocks (n = 2) with 38 and 72 steers per block and transported to the Calf Milk Research Facility at Purina Animal Nutrition in Grey Summit, Missouri, at 7 d of age. Steers were assigned to either a higher nutrient-dense milk replacer (MR) and starter (HI) or moderate nutrient- dense MR and starter (MOD) plane of nutrition through 92 d of age. Steers were weaned at 49 d and sorted into outdoor pens with 3 steers per pen. On d 84, steers were transported to the Willard Sparks Beef Research Center (WSBRC) in Stillwater, Oklahoma. At the WSBRC, steers were sorted by BW within preweaning treatment into 4 to 5 steers/pen and fed for 308 d. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 Mixed procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for all performance and noncategorical carcass measures. For preweaning measurements, individual calf was used as the experimental unit, whereas for finishing phase measurements pen was the experimental unit.

Results and Discussion

Steers fed HI prefinishing exhibited a greater BW through d 168 of the finishing phase and had greater DMI from d 0 to 28 and d 28 to 112, as well as greater percentage USDA Choice. Steers fed MOD had a greater G:F from d 28 to 112 and had greater overall G:F. There were no other differences in carcass characteristics due to preweaning plane of nutrition.

Implications and Applications

Providing calves with lesser nutrient-dense diets during the preweaning period, such as MOD treatment of the current research, did not result in enhanced performance through compensatory gain. Based on this study, a higher preweaning plane of nutrition allows heavier BW through 29 wk of age and improved carcass quality.
目的研究92日龄前不同营养水平对肉牛杂交阉牛后期肥育性能、饲料效率和胴体特性的影响。材料与方法牛乳杂交阉牛(n = 109),分2组(n = 2),每组分别为38头和72头,于7日龄运往密苏里州Grey Summit市Purina动物营养中心小牛奶研究设施。饲喂营养密度较高的代乳粉和发菜(HI)或中等营养密度的代乳粉和发菜(MOD),直至92日龄。49 d断奶,分装到室外猪圈,每个猪圈3头。84日,肉牛被运往俄克拉荷马州斯蒂尔沃特的威拉德·斯帕克斯牛肉研究中心(WSBRC)。在WSBRC,断奶前的阉牛按体重分为4 - 5头/栏,饲喂308 d。数据采用SAS 9.4混合程序(SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC)进行所有性能和非分类胴体测量分析。断奶前测量以犊牛个体为实验单位,育肥期测量以猪栏为实验单位。结果和讨论饲喂HI预育的阉牛在肥育期第168天表现出更高的体重,在第0 ~ 28天和第28 ~ 112天表现出更高的DMI,以及更高的USDA选择百分比。饲喂MOD的阉牛在第28天至第112天的G:F更高,总体G:F也更高。断奶前营养水平对胴体性状无其他影响。启示和应用在断奶前给犊牛提供营养密度较低的日粮,如本研究中的MOD处理,并不能通过补偿性增重提高生产性能。本研究表明,较高的断奶前营养水平可提高29周龄仔猪的体重,提高胴体品质。
{"title":"Plane of nutrition through 92 days of age in beef × dairy hybrid steers influences subsequent finishing performance, feed efficiency, and carcass characteristics","authors":"Ally Grote ,&nbsp;Olivia Genther-Schroeder ,&nbsp;Blake K. Wilson ,&nbsp;Troy Wistuba ,&nbsp;Paul Beck","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02607","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02607","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our objective was to determine the effect of plane of nutrition through 92 d of age on subsequent finishing performance, feed efficiency, and carcass characteristics in beef × dairy crossbred steers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Beef × dairy crossbred steers (n = 109) were acquired from commercial dairies in blocks (n = 2) with 38 and 72 steers per block and transported to the Calf Milk Research Facility at Purina Animal Nutrition in Grey Summit, Missouri, at 7 d of age. Steers were assigned to either a higher nutrient-dense milk replacer (MR) and starter (HI) or moderate nutrient- dense MR and starter (MOD) plane of nutrition through 92 d of age. Steers were weaned at 49 d and sorted into outdoor pens with 3 steers per pen. On d 84, steers were transported to the Willard Sparks Beef Research Center (WSBRC) in Stillwater, Oklahoma. At the WSBRC, steers were sorted by BW within preweaning treatment into 4 to 5 steers/pen and fed for 308 d. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 Mixed procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for all performance and noncategorical carcass measures. For preweaning measurements, individual calf was used as the experimental unit, whereas for finishing phase measurements pen was the experimental unit.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Steers fed HI prefinishing exhibited a greater BW through d 168 of the finishing phase and had greater DMI from d 0 to 28 and d 28 to 112, as well as greater percentage USDA Choice. Steers fed MOD had a greater G:F from d 28 to 112 and had greater overall G:F. There were no other differences in carcass characteristics due to preweaning plane of nutrition.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Providing calves with lesser nutrient-dense diets during the preweaning period, such as MOD treatment of the current research, did not result in enhanced performance through compensatory gain. Based on this study, a higher preweaning plane of nutrition allows heavier BW through 29 wk of age and improved carcass quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 307-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of flexible prepartum supplementation strategies on cow-calf and subsequent progeny feedlot performance in a May-calving herd 灵活的预备饲料补充策略对5月产犊牛群犊牛及其后代饲育性能的影响
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02597
Jacki A. Musgrave , Kacie L. McCarthy , J. Travis Mulliniks

Objective

The objective of this study was to evalu- ate the effects of minimal and flexible supplementation strategies on reproduction, cow BW, and subsequent calf performance in May-calving mature cows grazing upland native range.

Materials and Methods

Cows received one of 3 sup- plementation strategies: (1) 0.227 kg per day of a 30% CP distillers-based supplement (HalfSupp), (2) 0.454 kg per day of a 30% CP distillers-based supplement (Supp), or (3) brief and intermittent supplementation of Supp at 0.454 kg/cow based on periods of acute environmental stress, such as snow cover and wet winter events, which is best described as flexible supplementation (Flex). Supple- mentation was initiated in January each year and termi- nated approximately 30 d before the start of the calving season in April. After weaning, steers grazed subirrigated meadow with a dried distillers grain supplement until May. In May, all steers grazed subirrigated meadow with- out additional supplement until August/September when steers were shipped to the feedlot. Steers were placed in a GrowSafe feeding system for the rest of the finishing feeding period.

Results and Discussion

Cow BW was not different at the initiation of supplementation in January. However, cows fed HalfSupp had a lighter BW at precalving and tended to have a lighter BW at prebreeding than their counterparts. After a 45-d breeding season, pregnancy rates were not influenced by prepartum supplementation strategies. Prepartum supplementation strategies did not influence preweaning calf BW at birth, prebreeding, and weaning. In addition, steer backgrounding BW was also not influenced by their dam’s prepartum supplementation strategy. Upon entry into the feedlot, steer feedlot perfor- mance (BW, ADG, and feed efficiency) was not influenced by their dam’s prepartum supplementation strategy. After slaughter, no carcass characteristics were affected by the dam’s prepartum supplementation strategy.

Implications and Applications

Considering the cost of prepartum supplementation, feeding a protein supple- ment just during environmentally stressful periods during gestation appears to be a viable alternative to more conventional methods and reduces winter feed costs.
本研究的目的是评估少量和灵活的补充策略对放牧山地5月产犊的成熟奶牛的繁殖、奶牛体重和随后的小牛生产性能的影响。材料和方法母猪接受3种补充策略中的一种:(1)每天0.227 kg的30% CP酒糟饲料(HalfSupp),(2)每天0.454 kg的30% CP酒糟饲料(Supp),或(3)根据急性环境应激时期(如积雪和潮湿的冬季事件)以0.454 kg/头的速度短暂和间歇地补充Supp,这最好被描述为灵活补充(Flex)。每年1月开始补食,在4月产犊季节开始前30天左右结束。断奶后,用干酒糟谷物补充放牧,直到5月。在5月,所有的阉牛在没有额外补充的情况下放牧,直到8月/ 9月,阉牛被运到饲养场。在肥育期的其余时间里,阉牛被放置在GrowSafe饲喂系统中。结果与讨论1月份开始添加时牛的体重无显著差异。然而,饲喂半补给量的奶牛在产犊前的体重较轻,并且在预配种时的体重往往较轻。在45 d的繁殖季节后,孕前补充策略对妊娠率没有影响。预备饲料补充策略对犊牛出生、预备育种和断奶时的体重没有影响。此外,犊牛背景体重也不受饲粮补充策略的影响。进入饲养场后,母猪的生产性能(体重、平均日增重和饲料效率)不受饲喂前补饲策略的影响。屠宰后,坝前补料策略对胴体性状无影响。考虑到预备饲料补充的成本,在妊娠期环境紧张时期饲喂蛋白质补充似乎是一种可行的替代方法,可以降低冬季饲料成本。
{"title":"Effects of flexible prepartum supplementation strategies on cow-calf and subsequent progeny feedlot performance in a May-calving herd","authors":"Jacki A. Musgrave ,&nbsp;Kacie L. McCarthy ,&nbsp;J. Travis Mulliniks","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02597","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02597","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evalu- ate the effects of minimal and flexible supplementation strategies on reproduction, cow BW, and subsequent calf performance in May-calving mature cows grazing upland native range.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Cows received one of 3 sup- plementation strategies: (1) 0.227 kg per day of a 30% CP distillers-based supplement (HalfSupp), (2) 0.454 kg per day of a 30% CP distillers-based supplement (Supp), or (3) brief and intermittent supplementation of Supp at 0.454 kg/cow based on periods of acute environmental stress, such as snow cover and wet winter events, which is best described as flexible supplementation (Flex). Supple- mentation was initiated in January each year and termi- nated approximately 30 d before the start of the calving season in April. After weaning, steers grazed subirrigated meadow with a dried distillers grain supplement until May. In May, all steers grazed subirrigated meadow with- out additional supplement until August/September when steers were shipped to the feedlot. Steers were placed in a GrowSafe feeding system for the rest of the finishing feeding period.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Cow BW was not different at the initiation of supplementation in January. However, cows fed HalfSupp had a lighter BW at precalving and tended to have a lighter BW at prebreeding than their counterparts. After a 45-d breeding season, pregnancy rates were not influenced by prepartum supplementation strategies. Prepartum supplementation strategies did not influence preweaning calf BW at birth, prebreeding, and weaning. In addition, steer backgrounding BW was also not influenced by their dam’s prepartum supplementation strategy. Upon entry into the feedlot, steer feedlot perfor- mance (BW, ADG, and feed efficiency) was not influenced by their dam’s prepartum supplementation strategy. After slaughter, no carcass characteristics were affected by the dam’s prepartum supplementation strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Considering the cost of prepartum supplementation, feeding a protein supple- ment just during environmentally stressful periods during gestation appears to be a viable alternative to more conventional methods and reduces winter feed costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 298-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extended effects of postweaning management in southeastern beef calves 东南地区肉牛断奶后管理的延伸效应
IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.15232/aas.2024-02589
S. Maggie Justice , M. Kimberly Mullenix , Manuel F. Chamorro , D. Alex Tigue , S.L. Dillard , W.B. Smith , S.P. Rodning

Objective

Understanding the effects of postweaning management strategy on calf performance and health can help producers add value to their operations and further strengthen the viability of the beef supply chain. Our objective with this study was to evaluate the effects of weaning and postweaning management practices and potential carryover effects on calf immune system viability and performance through the feedyard finishing phase.

Materials and Methods

A 2-yr study was conducted using 429 steer calves from 3 Auburn University research farms. Calves were randomly assigned based on weaning weights to 1 of 3 different weaning method groups: fence-line weaning, nose-flap weaning, or abrupt weaning. After the weaning period (14 d), calves were brought to a centralized farm and began a 60-d backgrounding period where they were randomized according to previous weaning management, farm of origin, and BW to 1 of 3 nutritional management strategies in a 3 × 3 split-plot design: cool-season baleage and 1% BW dried distillers grain (DDGS), bermudagrass hay and 1% BW DDGS, or grazing of mixed warm-season annuals and 1% BW DDGS. Body weights were collected throughout the trial to measure growth and performance. Blood samples were collected throughout the backgrounding period to measure vaccination response. Following backgrounding calves were transported to a commercial feedyard and followed until finishing.

Results and Discussion

Fence-line-weaned calves had the greatest ADG (P = 0.02) in the first 30 d of the backgrounding period regardless of backgrounding diet type. Calves fed the bermudagrass-hay-based diet also had a greater ADG (P < 0.0001) than both the grazing and baleage diet groups in the first 30 d of backgrounding. Steers on both the warm-season annual grazing and cool- season baleage diets supported greater ADG (P = 0.0041) during the last 30 d of the backgrounding period.

Implications and Applications

Results indicate that weaning and backgrounding management strategies may influence calf performance during the transition period into the postweaning phase and performance in the feedyard phase.
目的了解断奶后管理策略对犊牛生产性能和健康的影响,有助于生产者为其经营增加价值,并进一步加强牛肉供应链的生存能力。本研究的目的是评估断奶和断奶后管理措施对犊牛免疫系统活力和育肥期生产性能的影响,以及潜在的后续影响。材料与方法对来自奥本大学3个研究农场的429头犊牛进行了为期2年的研究。根据断奶体重,将犊牛随机分配到围栏线断奶、鼻瓣断奶或突然断奶3个不同断奶方法组中的1个。断奶后(14 d),犊牛被带到一个集中式养殖场,开始60 d的背景期,在此期间,犊牛根据先前的断奶管理、原产农场和体重,随机选择3种营养管理策略中的1种,采用3 × 3分块设计:冷季饲草和1%体重的干酒糟(DDGS)、百米草干草和1%体重的干酒糟(DDGS),或混合放牧暖季一年生动物和1%体重的DDGS。在整个试验过程中收集体重以测量生长和性能。在整个背景期间收集血液样本以测量疫苗接种反应。随后,犊牛被运送到一个商业饲料场,并被跟踪直到肥育。结果与讨论无论背景日粮类型如何,围栏断奶犊牛在饲喂期前30 d的平均日增重最高(P = 0.02)。饲喂以百慕大草为基础的饲料的犊牛也有更高的平均日增重(P <;0.0001),高于放牧组和平衡饲粮组。在背景期的最后30 d,暖季和冷季混合饲粮的平均日增重均显著增加(P = 0.0041)。结果表明,断奶和背景管理策略可能会影响犊牛在断奶后过渡时期和饲草期的生产性能。
{"title":"Extended effects of postweaning management in southeastern beef calves","authors":"S. Maggie Justice ,&nbsp;M. Kimberly Mullenix ,&nbsp;Manuel F. Chamorro ,&nbsp;D. Alex Tigue ,&nbsp;S.L. Dillard ,&nbsp;W.B. Smith ,&nbsp;S.P. Rodning","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02589","DOIUrl":"10.15232/aas.2024-02589","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Understanding the effects of postweaning management strategy on calf performance and health can help producers add value to their operations and further strengthen the viability of the beef supply chain. Our objective with this study was to evaluate the effects of weaning and postweaning management practices and potential carryover effects on calf immune system viability and performance through the feedyard finishing phase.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A 2-yr study was conducted using 429 steer calves from 3 Auburn University research farms. Calves were randomly assigned based on weaning weights to 1 of 3 different weaning method groups: fence-line weaning, nose-flap weaning, or abrupt weaning. After the weaning period (14 d), calves were brought to a centralized farm and began a 60-d backgrounding period where they were randomized according to previous weaning management, farm of origin, and BW to 1 of 3 nutritional management strategies in a 3 × 3 split-plot design: cool-season baleage and 1% BW dried distillers grain (DDGS), bermudagrass hay and 1% BW DDGS, or grazing of mixed warm-season annuals and 1% BW DDGS. Body weights were collected throughout the trial to measure growth and performance. Blood samples were collected throughout the backgrounding period to measure vaccination response. Following backgrounding calves were transported to a commercial feedyard and followed until finishing.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Fence-line-weaned calves had the greatest ADG (<em>P</em> = 0.02) in the first 30 d of the backgrounding period regardless of backgrounding diet type. Calves fed the bermudagrass-hay-based diet also had a greater ADG (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) than both the grazing and baleage diet groups in the first 30 d of backgrounding. Steers on both the warm-season annual grazing and cool- season baleage diets supported greater ADG (<em>P</em> = 0.0041) during the last 30 d of the backgrounding period.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Results indicate that weaning and backgrounding management strategies may influence calf performance during the transition period into the postweaning phase and performance in the feedyard phase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 363-376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Applied Animal Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1