首页 > 最新文献

Assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Development of an Examiner-Examinee Rapport Scale for Neuropsychological Testing: The Barnett Rapport Questionnaire - 2. 神经心理测试考官-考生关系量表的开发:Barnett关系问卷- 2。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251315626
Michael D Barnett, Jenna M Moore, Rebekah A Griffin

Rapport in the context of neuropsychological assessment refers to the interpersonal interaction between the examinee and examiner. The purpose of this study was to improve upon the original Barnett Rapport Questionnaire. Participants consisted of college students (n = 55), middle-aged adults (n = 30), and older adults (n = 99) at a university-affiliated neuropsychology clinic, who were administered a brief test battery. After testing, both examinees (n = 184) and examiners (n = 12) completed items regarding the nature of the interpersonal interaction. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated a two-factor model consisting of nine items found on both the examinee and examiner versions. No age cohort differences were found on the total Barnett Rapport Questionnaire - 2 (BRQ-2) scores for the examiner or examinee version; however, older adults endorsed the positively worded items more than young adults, and examiners endorsed the negatively worded items more for young adult examinees than for older adult examinees. No differences were found by gender or by race/ethnicity. The BRQ-2 promises better usability and improved psychometric qualities for the measurement of rapport in the context of neuropsychological assessment.

在神经心理评估中,融洽关系是指考生与考官之间的人际互动。本研究的目的是改进原来的巴奈特融洽关系问卷。参与者包括大学附属神经心理学诊所的大学生(n = 55)、中年人(n = 30)和老年人(n = 99),他们接受了简短的测试。测试后,被试(n = 184)和主考官(n = 12)都完成了关于人际互动性质的项目。验证性因子分析表明,在考生版本和考官版本中都发现了一个由9个项目组成的双因素模型。在Barnett Rapport Questionnaire -2 (BRQ-2)总分上,主考版和考生版均未发现年龄队列差异;然而,老年人比年轻人更赞同积极词汇,而考官对年轻成人考生的消极词汇的认可程度高于老年成人考生。没有发现性别或种族/民族之间的差异。BRQ-2承诺在神经心理学评估的背景下更好的可用性和改进的心理测量质量来测量融洽关系。
{"title":"Development of an Examiner-Examinee Rapport Scale for Neuropsychological Testing: The Barnett Rapport Questionnaire - 2.","authors":"Michael D Barnett, Jenna M Moore, Rebekah A Griffin","doi":"10.1177/10731911251315626","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911251315626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapport in the context of neuropsychological assessment refers to the interpersonal interaction between the examinee and examiner. The purpose of this study was to improve upon the original Barnett Rapport Questionnaire. Participants consisted of college students (<i>n</i> = 55), middle-aged adults (<i>n</i> = 30), and older adults (<i>n</i> = 99) at a university-affiliated neuropsychology clinic, who were administered a brief test battery. After testing, both examinees (<i>n</i> = 184) and examiners (<i>n</i> = 12) completed items regarding the nature of the interpersonal interaction. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated a two-factor model consisting of nine items found on both the examinee and examiner versions. No age cohort differences were found on the total Barnett Rapport Questionnaire - 2 (BRQ-2) scores for the examiner or examinee version; however, older adults endorsed the positively worded items more than young adults, and examiners endorsed the negatively worded items more for young adult examinees than for older adult examinees. No differences were found by gender or by race/ethnicity. The BRQ-2 promises better usability and improved psychometric qualities for the measurement of rapport in the context of neuropsychological assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Language Aspects in the Assessment of Cognitive and Developmental Functions in Children: An Analysis of the Intelligence and Development Scales-2. 语言方面在儿童认知和发展功能评估中的作用:对智力和发展量表的分析-2。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251315027
Salome D Odermatt, Silvia Grieder, Florine Schweizer, Anette Bünger, Alexander Grob

The assessment of multilingual participants is challenging, as, for example, proficiency in the test language may interfere with test performance. We examined whether different language aspects (i.e., receptive and expressive language abilities, bi/multilingualism) contribute independently to the variance in scores on cognitive and developmental functions of the Intelligence and Development Scales-2 (IDS-2). The sample comprised 826 children aged 5 to 10 years living in German-speaking regions. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that receptive language ability was significantly associated with almost all IDS-2 scores. Expressive language ability explained little additional variance, except for the intelligence composites, Verbal Reasoning (including subtests), and the basic skills subtests. Bi/multilingualism explained variance above language abilities only in subtests of Verbal Reasoning and verbal Long-Term Memory. Findings highlight the importance of considering language proficiency, particularly in tasks with high verbal demands, when assessing cognitive and developmental functions with the IDS-2 in participants at risk for linguistic disadvantages.

对多语言参与者的评估具有挑战性,例如,测试语言的熟练程度可能会影响测试成绩。我们研究了不同的语言方面(即接受和表达语言能力,双语/多语能力)是否独立地影响智力和发展量表-2 (IDS-2)的认知和发展功能得分的差异。样本包括826名生活在德语区的5至10岁儿童。层次回归分析显示,接受性语言能力与几乎所有的IDS-2分数显著相关。除了智力综合、言语推理(包括子测试)和基本技能子测试外,表达语言能力几乎不能解释额外的差异。双/多语只能在言语推理和言语长期记忆的子测试中解释上述语言能力的差异。研究结果强调了考虑语言能力的重要性,特别是在高语言要求的任务中,当使用IDS-2评估有语言劣势风险的参与者的认知和发展功能时。
{"title":"The Role of Language Aspects in the Assessment of Cognitive and Developmental Functions in Children: An Analysis of the Intelligence and Development Scales-2.","authors":"Salome D Odermatt, Silvia Grieder, Florine Schweizer, Anette Bünger, Alexander Grob","doi":"10.1177/10731911251315027","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911251315027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of multilingual participants is challenging, as, for example, proficiency in the test language may interfere with test performance. We examined whether different language aspects (i.e., receptive and expressive language abilities, bi/multilingualism) contribute independently to the variance in scores on cognitive and developmental functions of the Intelligence and Development Scales-2 (IDS-2). The sample comprised 826 children aged 5 to 10 years living in German-speaking regions. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that receptive language ability was significantly associated with almost all IDS-2 scores. Expressive language ability explained little additional variance, except for the intelligence composites, Verbal Reasoning (including subtests), and the basic skills subtests. Bi/multilingualism explained variance above language abilities only in subtests of Verbal Reasoning and verbal Long-Term Memory. Findings highlight the importance of considering language proficiency, particularly in tasks with high verbal demands, when assessing cognitive and developmental functions with the IDS-2 in participants at risk for linguistic disadvantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"27-45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686191/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143078502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Structural Validity of the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale-Short Form Among College Students Who Drink Alcohol. 饮酒大学生的巴克利执行功能缺陷量表-简表的结构有效性。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251316468
Alexandra Hernandez-Vallant, Margo C Hurlocker, Alison Looby, Byron L Zamboanga

The Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS) is a multidimensional measure of executive functioning (EF). Yet, no work has validated the 20-item BDEFS short form (BDEFS-SF) among individuals at risk of EF deficits, including college students who consume alcohol. The current study evaluated the factor structure and measurement invariance of the BDEFS-SF in 867 undergraduates from 12 colleges/universities who endorsed past-month alcohol use. The bifactor model best fit the data, supporting the use of the general factor over the five subscales for measurement models, and measurement invariance was partially supported across sex assigned at birth. Four subscales were uniquely associated with alcohol use, consequences, and alcohol protective behavioral strategies. The BDEFS-SF total score appears to be a valid measure of EF among undergraduates who use alcohol; however, more research is needed to increase the clinical utility of the measure given the lack of support for the use of the subscales in measurement models.

巴克利执行功能缺陷量表(BDEFS)是一种多维度的执行功能量表。然而,目前还没有研究在有EF缺陷风险的个体(包括饮酒的大学生)中验证包含20项的BDEFS简表。本研究评估了来自12所高校的867名认可过去一个月饮酒的本科生的BDEFS-SF的因素结构和测量不变性。双因子模型最适合数据,支持在五个子尺度上使用一般因子进行测量模型,并且部分支持出生性别分配的测量不变性。四个分量表与酒精使用、后果和酒精保护行为策略有独特的关联。BDEFS-SF总分似乎是衡量饮酒大学生EF的有效指标;然而,由于缺乏对测量模型中使用分量表的支持,需要更多的研究来增加该测量的临床效用。
{"title":"The Structural Validity of the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale-Short Form Among College Students Who Drink Alcohol.","authors":"Alexandra Hernandez-Vallant, Margo C Hurlocker, Alison Looby, Byron L Zamboanga","doi":"10.1177/10731911251316468","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911251316468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS) is a multidimensional measure of executive functioning (EF). Yet, no work has validated the 20-item BDEFS short form (BDEFS-SF) among individuals at risk of EF deficits, including college students who consume alcohol. The current study evaluated the factor structure and measurement invariance of the BDEFS-SF in 867 undergraduates from 12 colleges/universities who endorsed past-month alcohol use. The bifactor model best fit the data, supporting the use of the general factor over the five subscales for measurement models, and measurement invariance was partially supported across sex assigned at birth. Four subscales were uniquely associated with alcohol use, consequences, and alcohol protective behavioral strategies. The BDEFS-SF total score appears to be a valid measure of EF among undergraduates who use alcohol; however, more research is needed to increase the clinical utility of the measure given the lack of support for the use of the subscales in measurement models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"131-142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-National Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Within Adolescent Populations: Findings From 43 Countries. 在青少年人群中对WHO-5幸福指数的跨国验证:来自43个国家的调查结果。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241309452
Philipp E Sischka, Gina Martin, Caroline Residori, Nour Hammami, Nicholas Page, Christina Schnohr, Alina Cosma

The five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most frequently used brief standard measures to assess hedonic well-being. Numerous studies have investigated different facets of its psychometric properties in adult populations. However, whether these results apply to adolescents is uncertain, and only few psychometric studies employed adolescent populations. Thus, the current study aimed to conduct an in-depth psychometric item response theory analysis of the WHO-5 among adolescents from 43 countries using the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) 2022 data set and investigated its (a) dimensionality and measurement structure, (b) test information values and marginal reliability, (c) cross-country measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning, and (d) convergent validity with other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries. The WHO-5 showed a unidimensional measurement structure and overall high test information values and marginal reliability. Furthermore, although a large proportion of parameters were flagged as non-invariant, differential test functioning of the WHO-5 was only modest. Moreover, the WHO-5 mainly showed a concurring nomological network with the other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries, although with some differences in effect sizes. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index is a psychometrically sound measure that has shown promise for cross-cultural research among adolescents in the included European, Central Asia, and North American countries. The translated versions of the WHO-5 are available at https://osf.io/pbexq.

五项世界卫生组织幸福指数(WHO-5)是评估享乐幸福最常用的简短标准措施之一。许多研究调查了成人群体心理测量特性的不同方面。然而,这些结果是否适用于青少年是不确定的,只有少数心理测量学研究采用青少年人群。因此,本研究旨在利用《学龄儿童健康行为(HBSC) 2022》数据集对43个国家青少年的WHO-5进行深入的心理测量项目反应理论分析,并对其(a)维度和测量结构、(b)测试信息值和边际信度、(c)跨国测量不变性和差异项目/测试功能进行研究。(d)与各国与心理健康和福祉有关的其他措施的趋同效度。WHO-5量表具有单元化的测量结构,总体上具有较高的检测信息值和边际信度。此外,尽管很大一部分参数被标记为非不变参数,但WHO-5的差异测试功能只是适度的。此外,世卫组织-5主要显示了与各国心理健康和福祉相关的其他措施一致的法则网络,尽管在效应大小上存在一些差异。世卫组织-5幸福指数是一种心理计量学上合理的衡量标准,在所包括的欧洲、中亚和北美国家的青少年中显示出跨文化研究的希望。世卫组织-5的翻译版本可在https://osf.io/pbexq上获得。
{"title":"Cross-National Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Within Adolescent Populations: Findings From 43 Countries.","authors":"Philipp E Sischka, Gina Martin, Caroline Residori, Nour Hammami, Nicholas Page, Christina Schnohr, Alina Cosma","doi":"10.1177/10731911241309452","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241309452","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most frequently used brief standard measures to assess hedonic well-being. Numerous studies have investigated different facets of its psychometric properties in adult populations. However, whether these results apply to adolescents is uncertain, and only few psychometric studies employed adolescent populations. Thus, the current study aimed to conduct an in-depth psychometric item response theory analysis of the WHO-5 among adolescents from 43 countries using the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) 2022 data set and investigated its (a) dimensionality and measurement structure, (b) test information values and marginal reliability, (c) cross-country measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning, and (d) convergent validity with other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries. The WHO-5 showed a unidimensional measurement structure and overall high test information values and marginal reliability. Furthermore, although a large proportion of parameters were flagged as non-invariant, differential test functioning of the WHO-5 was only modest. Moreover, the WHO-5 mainly showed a concurring nomological network with the other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries, although with some differences in effect sizes. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index is a psychometrically sound measure that has shown promise for cross-cultural research among adolescents in the included European, Central Asia, and North American countries. The translated versions of the WHO-5 are available at https://osf.io/pbexq.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"3-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of Cognition and Language Using Alternative Response Modalities. 使用替代反应模式评估认知和语言。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251315012
Kristine Stadskleiv, Katy Latham, Kristina Tufteskog Spanne, Karen Sætre, Anna Fraas, Ilaria Ruscito, Yasmine Taha, Janice Murray

Assessing cognition and language using standardized tests is challenging when the individual has severe speech and motor impairments. Tests with a multiple-choice format may be adapted without compromising standardization using alternative response modes like partner assisted scanning (PAS) and eye-pointing (EP). Standardization of such assessment is little researched. The study investigates the (a) reliability of, (b) transparency of, and (c) adherence to assessment protocols using PAS and EP. The participants were students from special needs education and speech and language therapy, who worked in dyads (n = 39). Two observers recorded a number of errors made in protocol delivery, independently of each other. The dyads made between 0 and 81.5 errors. Number of errors was not related to response mode, t(38) = -0.21, p = .839. The observers were in high agreement, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .97, p < .001. The study suggests that assessing language involving alternative modes of responding can be successfully taught to novice practitioners.

当个体有严重的语言和运动障碍时,使用标准化测试评估认知和语言是具有挑战性的。采用多项选择题形式的测试可以在不影响标准化的情况下进行调整,使用其他响应模式,如合作伙伴辅助扫描(PAS)和眼睛指向(EP)。这种评估的标准化研究很少。该研究调查了(a)使用PAS和EP评估方案的可靠性,(b)透明度和(c)依从性。参与者是来自特殊需要教育和言语和语言治疗的学生,他们是二人组(n = 39)。两个观察者记录了协议传递中产生的一些错误,彼此独立。二人组的误差在0到81.5之间。错误数与应答方式无关,t(38) = -0.21, p = .839。观察结果高度一致,类内相关系数为0.97,p
{"title":"Assessment of Cognition and Language Using Alternative Response Modalities.","authors":"Kristine Stadskleiv, Katy Latham, Kristina Tufteskog Spanne, Karen Sætre, Anna Fraas, Ilaria Ruscito, Yasmine Taha, Janice Murray","doi":"10.1177/10731911251315012","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911251315012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing cognition and language using standardized tests is challenging when the individual has severe speech and motor impairments. Tests with a multiple-choice format may be adapted without compromising standardization using alternative response modes like partner assisted scanning (PAS) and eye-pointing (EP). Standardization of such assessment is little researched. The study investigates the (a) reliability of, (b) transparency of, and (c) adherence to assessment protocols using PAS and EP. The participants were students from special needs education and speech and language therapy, who worked in dyads (<i>n</i> = 39). Two observers recorded a number of errors made in protocol delivery, independently of each other. The dyads made between 0 and 81.5 errors. Number of errors was not related to response mode, <i>t</i>(38) = -0.21, <i>p</i> = .839. The observers were in high agreement, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .97, <i>p</i> < .001. The study suggests that assessing language involving alternative modes of responding can be successfully taught to novice practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"46-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143397928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale in a Sample of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Adults. 跨性别及性别差异成人内感受意识量表多维度评估的验证。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241308085
Rachel E Frietchen, Marley G Billman Miller, Dominic M Denning, April R Smith, Tiffany A Brown

The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) is a leading assessment of interoception. We examined the factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the MAIA-2 and its associations with psychopathology in a sample of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adults. Participants (N = 301) were recruited via Prolific Academic. Regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between the MAIA-2 subscales, disordered eating, and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. The eight-factor MAIA-2 demonstrated good model fit after removing Item 2. The MAIA-2 subscales were significantly positively associated with body appreciation and body satisfaction and negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The MAIA-2 subscales also demonstrated several significant associations with disordered eating. Only Body Trust was significantly negatively associated with participants' perceived likelihood of making a future suicide attempt. This study provided preliminary evidence that the MAIA-2 is an adequate measure of interception in TGD samples.

内感受意识的多维评估(MAIA-2)是一个领先的内感受评估。我们研究了跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)成人样本中MAIA-2的因子结构和心理测量特征及其与精神病理的关系。参与者(N = 301)通过高产学术网站招募。通过回归分析来检验MAIA-2量表、饮食失调和自伤思想和行为之间的关系。8因子MAIA-2在剔除第2项后模型拟合良好。MAIA-2量表与身体欣赏和身体满意度呈显著正相关,与抑郁、焦虑和压力呈显著负相关。MAIA-2亚量表也显示出与饮食失调的几个显著关联。只有身体信任与参与者感知到的未来自杀企图的可能性呈显著负相关。该研究提供了初步证据,表明MAIA-2是TGD样品中拦截的适当测量。
{"title":"Validation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale in a Sample of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Adults.","authors":"Rachel E Frietchen, Marley G Billman Miller, Dominic M Denning, April R Smith, Tiffany A Brown","doi":"10.1177/10731911241308085","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241308085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) is a leading assessment of interoception. We examined the factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the MAIA-2 and its associations with psychopathology in a sample of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adults. Participants (<i>N</i> = 301) were recruited via Prolific Academic. Regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between the MAIA-2 subscales, disordered eating, and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. The eight-factor MAIA-2 demonstrated good model fit after removing Item 2. The MAIA-2 subscales were significantly positively associated with body appreciation and body satisfaction and negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The MAIA-2 subscales also demonstrated several significant associations with disordered eating. Only Body Trust was significantly negatively associated with participants' perceived likelihood of making a future suicide attempt. This study provided preliminary evidence that the MAIA-2 is an adequate measure of interception in TGD samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"100-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142943378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testing a Multidimensional Factor Structure of the Self-Control Scale. 自我控制量表多维因素结构的检验。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241301473
Katherine L Collison, Donald R Lynam, Tianwei V Du, Susan C South

The Self-Control Scale (SCS) is one of the most widely used measures in the clinical, personality, and social psychology fields. It is often treated as unidimensional, even though no research supports such a unidimensional factor structure. We tested the factor structure in an undergraduate sample as well as a community sample used for additional confirmatory analyses. Factors from the best-fitting confirmatory models were correlated with putatively related and distinct constructs to assess their (dis)similarities. Consistent with hypotheses, the best-fitting factor structure consisted of multiple, correlated factors; however, none of the factor solutions met pre-specified fit criteria. Several additional analyses were conducted beyond the preregistered analyses to find a reasonably fitting factor solution. Ultimately, study findings support a two-factor solution using the items of the Brief Self-Control Scale. Results are discussed for the full 36-item scale as well as the brief, 13-item scale. We conclude with lessons learned from a Registered Report focused on factor analysis.

自我控制量表(SCS)是临床、人格和社会心理学领域应用最广泛的测量方法之一。它通常被认为是一维的,尽管没有研究支持这种一维的因素结构。我们在一个大学生样本和一个社区样本中测试了因子结构,用于额外的验证性分析。来自最佳拟合验证模型的因素与推定相关和不同的结构相关联,以评估其(非)相似性。与假设一致,最佳拟合因子结构由多个相关因子组成;然而,没有一个因子解满足预先指定的拟合标准。在预登记分析之外进行了一些额外的分析,以找到合理的拟合因子解决方案。最终,研究结果支持使用简短自我控制量表项目的双因素解决方案。讨论了完整的36项量表和简短的13项量表的结果。最后,我们从一份以因素分析为重点的注册报告中吸取教训。
{"title":"Testing a Multidimensional Factor Structure of the Self-Control Scale.","authors":"Katherine L Collison, Donald R Lynam, Tianwei V Du, Susan C South","doi":"10.1177/10731911241301473","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241301473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Self-Control Scale (SCS) is one of the most widely used measures in the clinical, personality, and social psychology fields. It is often treated as unidimensional, even though no research supports such a unidimensional factor structure. We tested the factor structure in an undergraduate sample as well as a community sample used for additional confirmatory analyses. Factors from the best-fitting confirmatory models were correlated with putatively related and distinct constructs to assess their (dis)similarities. Consistent with hypotheses, the best-fitting factor structure consisted of multiple, correlated factors; however, none of the factor solutions met pre-specified fit criteria. Several additional analyses were conducted beyond the preregistered analyses to find a reasonably fitting factor solution. Ultimately, study findings support a two-factor solution using the items of the Brief Self-Control Scale. Results are discussed for the full 36-item scale as well as the brief, 13-item scale. We conclude with lessons learned from a Registered Report focused on factor analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"115-130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric Properties of the Flourish Index and the Secure Flourish Index in Healthcare Settings. 医疗保健环境中繁荣指数和安全繁荣指数的心理测量特性。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241310312
Xitao Liu, Christopher Falco, Gregory Guldner, Jason T Siegel

Research on the construct of flourishing spans many fields of study. This study extends previous work by VanderWeele by investigating the measurement of flourishing, focusing on the structure and convergent validity of the Flourish Index (FI) and the Secure Flourish Index (SFI) within a national, multi-site sample of resident physicians. Through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFAs and CFAs), we assessed whether the FI and the SFI aligned with the theoretical flourishing models that VanderWeele suggested. We examined the convergent validity of both indices by testing whether they exhibited expected correlations with six different scales. The results of factor analyses and scale validation showed that data collected by the FI and the SFI fit the structural model of flourishing proposed by VanderWeele. Although prior studies reliably indicate that CFA results align with VanderWeele's model, this is a rare study where the EFA results also demonstrated a structure that aligns with his framework. Both scales exhibited strong convergent validity, producing data correlated with all six measures in the predicted directions. Although convergent validity has been previously shown, this study replicated and expanded evidence of the construct validity of data provided by the FI and the SFI.

关于繁荣建设的研究跨越了许多研究领域。本研究扩展了VanderWeele之前的工作,通过调查繁荣的测量,重点关注繁荣指数(FI)和安全繁荣指数(SFI)在全国多地点住院医师样本中的结构和收敛有效性。通过探索性和验证性因子分析(EFAs和CFAs),我们评估了FI和SFI是否与VanderWeele提出的理论繁荣模型一致。我们通过测试这两个指标是否在六个不同的尺度上表现出预期的相关性来检验它们的收敛有效性。因子分析和量表验证结果表明,FI和SFI收集的数据符合VanderWeele提出的繁荣结构模型。尽管先前的研究可靠地表明CFA结果与VanderWeele的模型一致,但这是一项罕见的研究,其中EFA结果也证明了与他的框架一致的结构。两种量表都表现出很强的收敛效度,在预测方向上产生与所有六个测量相关的数据。虽然收敛效度之前已经被证明,但本研究复制并扩展了FI和SFI提供的数据的结构效度的证据。
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Flourish Index and the Secure Flourish Index in Healthcare Settings.","authors":"Xitao Liu, Christopher Falco, Gregory Guldner, Jason T Siegel","doi":"10.1177/10731911241310312","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241310312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on the construct of flourishing spans many fields of study. This study extends previous work by VanderWeele by investigating the measurement of flourishing, focusing on the structure and convergent validity of the Flourish Index (FI) and the Secure Flourish Index (SFI) within a national, multi-site sample of resident physicians. Through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFAs and CFAs), we assessed whether the FI and the SFI aligned with the theoretical flourishing models that VanderWeele suggested. We examined the convergent validity of both indices by testing whether they exhibited expected correlations with six different scales. The results of factor analyses and scale validation showed that data collected by the FI and the SFI fit the structural model of flourishing proposed by VanderWeele. Although prior studies reliably indicate that CFA results align with VanderWeele's model, this is a rare study where the EFA results also demonstrated a structure that aligns with his framework. Both scales exhibited strong convergent validity, producing data correlated with all six measures in the predicted directions. Although convergent validity has been previously shown, this study replicated and expanded evidence of the construct validity of data provided by the FI and the SFI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"143-159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143078500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric and Normative Information on the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory With Parent Ratings in a Nationally Representative Sample of Spanish Youth. 儿童和青少年行为量表的心理测量和规范信息与父母评分在西班牙青年的全国代表性样本。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251317785
G Leonard Burns, Juan José Montaño, Stephen P Becker, Mateu Servera

Psychometric and normative information is provided for the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) cognitive disengagement syndrome, anxiety, depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-inattention, ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity, oppositional defiant disorder, social impairment, peer rejection, withdrawal from peer interactions, and academic impairment scales with a nationally representative sample of Spanish youth. Parents of 5,525 Spanish youth (ages 5-16, 56.1% males) completed the CABI scales on their sons and daughters. Scores on the 10 CABI scales demonstrated excellent reliability, invariance, and validity for males and females within early childhood (ages 5-8), middle childhood (ages 9-12), and adolescence (ages 13-16). Normative information (T-scores) is provided for females and males within each age group for the 10 CABI scales. The new psychometric and normative information increase the usefulness of the CABI scale scores for research and clinical activities. Copies of the CABI and the norms are available at no cost to professionals.

心理测量和规范信息提供了儿童和青少年行为量表(CABI)认知脱离综合征,焦虑,抑郁,注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)-注意力不集中,ADHD-多动/冲动,对立违抗性障碍,社会障碍,同伴排斥,退出同伴互动和学业障碍量表与全国代表性的西班牙青年样本。5525名西班牙青年(5-16岁,56.1%为男性)的父母完成了他们儿子和女儿的CABI量表。10个CABI量表的得分在儿童早期(5-8岁)、儿童中期(9-12岁)和青春期(13-16岁)的男性和女性中表现出极好的信度、不变性和效度。在10个CABI量表中,为每个年龄组的女性和男性提供了规范性信息(t分数)。新的心理测量和规范信息增加了CABI量表在研究和临床活动中的有用性。专业人员可以免费获得CABI和规范的副本。
{"title":"Psychometric and Normative Information on the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory With Parent Ratings in a Nationally Representative Sample of Spanish Youth.","authors":"G Leonard Burns, Juan José Montaño, Stephen P Becker, Mateu Servera","doi":"10.1177/10731911251317785","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911251317785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychometric and normative information is provided for the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) cognitive disengagement syndrome, anxiety, depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-inattention, ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity, oppositional defiant disorder, social impairment, peer rejection, withdrawal from peer interactions, and academic impairment scales with a nationally representative sample of Spanish youth. Parents of 5,525 Spanish youth (ages 5-16, 56.1% males) completed the CABI scales on their sons and daughters. Scores on the 10 CABI scales demonstrated excellent reliability, invariance, and validity for males and females within early childhood (ages 5-8), middle childhood (ages 9-12), and adolescence (ages 13-16). Normative information (<i>T</i>-scores) is provided for females and males within each age group for the 10 CABI scales. The new psychometric and normative information increase the usefulness of the CABI scale scores for research and clinical activities. Copies of the CABI and the norms are available at no cost to professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"77-88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143481990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toward Digital Assessment of Developmental Dyslexia in Mainland China: Establishing Nationwide Norms With a GAMLSS Approach. 中国大陆发展性阅读障碍的数字化评估:用GAMLSS方法建立全国性标准。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251406404
Wenjuan Liu, Jiuju Wang, Hanwen Zhang, Yuping Zhang, Hongyun Liu, Hua Shu, Yufeng Wang, Yueqin Hu, Hong Li

Existing diagnosis instruments for developmental dyslexia (DD) in mainland China are limited in generalizability and typically rely on traditional norming approaches, which require large sample sizes to achieve precision. This study aims to develop and validate the Beijing Normal University Diagnostic Tool for Chinese Mandarin Developmental Dyslexia (BNU-DTCMDD), a DD diagnostic tool with regression-based norms for elementary school students in mainland China. A nationally representative sample of 3,782 first-to-sixth-grade students and a clinical sample of 84 first-to-sixth-grade students diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLD) were administered the BNU-DTCMDD, comprising six tasks that measure reading abilities and related cognitive skills. The tool demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α .73-.99), good test-retest reliability (Pearson's r .68-.99), good structural validity, and reasonable criterion validity (Cohen's d 0.27-0.63). Norms were established using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS), yielding percentile curves and Z-scores. Based on the norms, the prevalence of DD was 6.08% in the normative sample and 73.81% in the clinical sample with SLD. The BNU-DTCMDD can diagnose DD in elementary school students in mainland China with good reliability and validity, and its regression-based norms overcome the statistical constraints of traditional norming and support timely diagnosis and intervention for DD.

中国大陆现有的发展性阅读障碍(DD)诊断工具的通用性有限,通常依赖于传统的规范化方法,需要大样本量才能达到精度。本研究旨在开发并验证北京师范大学中文普通话发展性阅读障碍诊断工具(BNU-DTCMDD),这是一个基于回归规范的中国大陆小学生阅读障碍诊断工具。对3782名一至六年级学生和84名诊断为特殊学习障碍(SLD)的一至六年级学生进行了全国代表性样本的BNU-DTCMDD,包括六个测试阅读能力和相关认知技能的任务。该工具具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.73 ~ 0.99),良好的重测信度(Pearson’s r = 0.68 ~ 0.99),良好的结构效度和合理的标准效度(Cohen’s d = 0.27 ~ 0.63)。使用位置、规模和形状的广义加性模型(GAMLSS)建立规范,产生百分位曲线和z分数。根据规范,规范样本中DD患病率为6.08%,临床样本中SLD患病率为73.81%。BNU-DTCMDD能够诊断中国大陆小学生的DD,具有良好的信度和效度,其基于回归的规范克服了传统规范的统计约束,支持DD的及时诊断和干预。
{"title":"Toward Digital Assessment of Developmental Dyslexia in Mainland China: Establishing Nationwide Norms With a GAMLSS Approach.","authors":"Wenjuan Liu, Jiuju Wang, Hanwen Zhang, Yuping Zhang, Hongyun Liu, Hua Shu, Yufeng Wang, Yueqin Hu, Hong Li","doi":"10.1177/10731911251406404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251406404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing diagnosis instruments for developmental dyslexia (DD) in mainland China are limited in generalizability and typically rely on traditional norming approaches, which require large sample sizes to achieve precision. This study aims to develop and validate the Beijing Normal University Diagnostic Tool for Chinese Mandarin Developmental Dyslexia (BNU-DTCMDD), a DD diagnostic tool with regression-based norms for elementary school students in mainland China. A nationally representative sample of 3,782 first-to-sixth-grade students and a clinical sample of 84 first-to-sixth-grade students diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLD) were administered the BNU-DTCMDD, comprising six tasks that measure reading abilities and related cognitive skills. The tool demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α .73-.99), good test-retest reliability (Pearson's <i>r</i> .68-.99), good structural validity, and reasonable criterion validity (Cohen's <i>d</i> 0.27-0.63). Norms were established using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS), yielding percentile curves and Z-scores. Based on the norms, the prevalence of DD was 6.08% in the normative sample and 73.81% in the clinical sample with SLD. The BNU-DTCMDD can diagnose DD in elementary school students in mainland China with good reliability and validity, and its regression-based norms overcome the statistical constraints of traditional norming and support timely diagnosis and intervention for DD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251406404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145861912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1