首页 > 最新文献

Assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Psychometric Evaluation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale in LGBTQIA+ Parents. LGBTQIA+ 家长多维养育评估量表的心理测量学评估。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241289501
Violeta J Rodriguez, Qimin Liu

In LGBTQIA+ adults, 36% are parents, but there are a limited number of parenting scales that have undergone psychometric evaluation in LGBTQIA+ parents. This study assessed the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale (MAPS) in LGBTQIA+ parents, addressing a gap in parenting scales considering both positive and negative aspects for this group. Our study includes two racially and ethnically diverse national samples of parents (n = 2,299, mean age = 37.05 years, 32.84% LGBTQIA+). We explored measurement invariance between LGBTQIA+ and non-LGBTQIA+ parents. The analysis revealed a modest fit for configural and metric invariance, indicating the MAPS structure and item loadings were consistent across groups, although scalar invariance was only partially supported. Subscales showed good internal consistency for both parent groups. Importantly, following false discovery rate corrections, interactions between LGBTQIA+ status and specific MAPS subscales (supportiveness, physical control) were significantly, but differentially, related to various child psychopathology dimensions, suggesting parenting impacts may differ for LGBTQIA+ families. These findings underscore the importance of including LGBTQIA+ perspectives in parenting research to develop tailored interventions that address their unique strengths and challenges. Acknowledging and supporting the diverse experiences of LGBTQIA+ parents can enhance targeted resources and interventions, contributing to better outcomes for all families.

在 LGBTQIA+ 成年人中,有 36% 为人父母,但针对 LGBTQIA+ 父母进行心理测量评估的养育量表数量有限。本研究评估了 LGBTQIA+ 父母的多维养育评估量表(MAPS),弥补了养育量表在考虑该群体的积极和消极方面方面的空白。我们的研究包括两个不同种族和民族的全国父母样本(n = 2,299,平均年龄 = 37.05 岁,32.84% 为 LGBTQIA+)。我们探讨了 LGBTQIA+ 和非 LGBTQIA+ 父母之间的测量不变性。分析表明,虽然标度不变性仅得到部分支持,但配置不变性和度量不变性适度吻合,表明 MAPS 结构和项目负荷在不同群体之间是一致的。两个父代群体的子量表显示出良好的内部一致性。重要的是,经过误发现率校正后,LGBTQIA+ 身份与特定 MAPS 子量表(支持性、身体控制)之间的交互作用与各种儿童心理病理学维度有显著但不同的关系,这表明养育方式对 LGBTQIA+ 家庭的影响可能有所不同。这些发现强调了将 LGBTQIA+ 视角纳入育儿研究的重要性,以便针对他们独特的优势和挑战制定有针对性的干预措施。承认并支持 LGBTQIA+ 家长的不同经历可以增强有针对性的资源和干预措施,从而为所有家庭带来更好的结果。
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale in LGBTQIA+ Parents.","authors":"Violeta J Rodriguez, Qimin Liu","doi":"10.1177/10731911241289501","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241289501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In LGBTQIA+ adults, 36% are parents, but there are a limited number of parenting scales that have undergone psychometric evaluation in LGBTQIA+ parents. This study assessed the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale (MAPS) in LGBTQIA+ parents, addressing a gap in parenting scales considering both positive and negative aspects for this group. Our study includes two racially and ethnically diverse national samples of parents (<i>n</i> = 2,299, mean age = 37.05 years, 32.84% LGBTQIA+). We explored measurement invariance between LGBTQIA+ and non-LGBTQIA+ parents. The analysis revealed a modest fit for configural and metric invariance, indicating the MAPS structure and item loadings were consistent across groups, although scalar invariance was only partially supported. Subscales showed good internal consistency for both parent groups. Importantly, following false discovery rate corrections, interactions between LGBTQIA+ status and specific MAPS subscales (supportiveness, physical control) were significantly, but differentially, related to various child psychopathology dimensions, suggesting parenting impacts may differ for LGBTQIA+ families. These findings underscore the importance of including LGBTQIA+ perspectives in parenting research to develop tailored interventions that address their unique strengths and challenges. Acknowledging and supporting the diverse experiences of LGBTQIA+ parents can enhance targeted resources and interventions, contributing to better outcomes for all families.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1158-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142493729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Latent Structure and Item Functioning of Self-Referent Encoding Task Word Stimuli in Preadolescent Youth. 青春期前青少年自我参照编码任务单词刺激的潜在结构和项目功能。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-23 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241289249
Lindsay N Gabel, Thomas M Olino, Brandon L Goldstein, Daniel N Klein, Kasey Stanton, Elizabeth P Hayden

The Self-Referent Encoding Task (SRET) can be used to measure self-concept via endorsement of trait words, a robust metric associated with depression severity. Our study is the first to investigate the structural validity and item functioning of SRET endorsement scores using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Community-dwelling preadolescent youth (N = 508; Mage = 12.39 years, SDage = .72) were shown a list of positive and negative trait adjectives and made binary ratings of whether words were self-descriptive. The SRET exhibited a two-factor structure, comprising positive and negative factors. Positive items were endorsed by most children and best estimated information about positive self-concepts below average levels of positivity. Conversely, negative items were unendorsed by most children and best estimated information about negative self-concepts above average levels of negativity. We identify standardized, psychometrically sound, and developmentally sensitive SRET items for assessing youth self-concept and its associations with depression risk.

自我参照编码任务(SRET)可通过对特质词的认可来测量自我概念,这是一种与抑郁症严重程度相关的可靠指标。我们的研究首次采用确证因子分析和项目反应理论对 SRET 背书得分的结构效度和项目功能进行了研究。我们向居住在社区的青春期前青少年(N = 508;Mage = 12.39 岁,SDage = .72)展示了一系列积极和消极的特质形容词,并对这些词是否具有自我描述性进行了二元评分。SRET 呈双因素结构,包括积极因素和消极因素。积极项目得到了大多数儿童的认可,对低于平均积极水平的积极自我概念的信息估计最为准确。相反,大多数儿童都不认可消极项目,而对消极自我概念的最佳估计是高于平均消极水平。我们确定了标准化、符合心理测量学原理且对发展敏感的 SRET 项目,用于评估青少年的自我概念及其与抑郁风险的关联。
{"title":"Latent Structure and Item Functioning of Self-Referent Encoding Task Word Stimuli in Preadolescent Youth.","authors":"Lindsay N Gabel, Thomas M Olino, Brandon L Goldstein, Daniel N Klein, Kasey Stanton, Elizabeth P Hayden","doi":"10.1177/10731911241289249","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241289249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Self-Referent Encoding Task (SRET) can be used to measure self-concept via endorsement of trait words, a robust metric associated with depression severity. Our study is the first to investigate the structural validity and item functioning of SRET endorsement scores using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Community-dwelling preadolescent youth (<i>N</i> = 508; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.39 years, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = .72) were shown a list of positive and negative trait adjectives and made binary ratings of whether words were self-descriptive. The SRET exhibited a two-factor structure, comprising positive and negative factors. Positive items were endorsed by most children and best estimated information about positive self-concepts below average levels of positivity. Conversely, negative items were unendorsed by most children and best estimated information about negative self-concepts above average levels of negativity. We identify standardized, psychometrically sound, and developmentally sensitive SRET items for assessing youth self-concept and its associations with depression risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397560/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric Evaluation of the Heterosexist Harassment, Rejection, and Discrimination Scale: Identification of a Unidimensional 11-Item Scale. 异性恋骚扰、拒绝和歧视量表的心理评估:确定单维度的 11 个项目量表。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-23 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241293222
C E Broshek, A J Kurtz, N S Udupa, C J Chang, M L Rogers, B A Feinstein, E A Selby, K L Gratz, M T Tull, T E Joiner, M E Jeon

Despite the Heterosexist Harassment, Rejection, and Discrimination Scale (HHRDS) being a routinely used measure of discrimination, there is no current consensus regarding its fundamental psychometric properties. This study sought to: (a) test the dimensionality of the scale using a classical test theory approach, and (b), if lacking a clear multidimensional structure, use an item response theory approach to develop a concise unidimensional measure and examine differential item and test functioning across various identity factors. In a sample of sexual minority adults (N = 1,243), evaluation of the HHRDS supported a reduced 11-item unidimensional measure. Assessment of differential item functioning suggested differences for some items between cisgender men and cisgender women, cisgender men and gender-diverse individuals, gay/lesbian and bi+ individuals, and white/non-Latine individuals and people of color. However, differential item functioning had minimal impact on total test scores, supporting the use of the revised 11-item HHRDS across groups.

尽管异性恋骚扰、拒绝和歧视量表(HHRDS)是一种常用的歧视测量方法,但目前对其基本心理测量特性还没有达成共识。本研究旨在(a) 使用经典测验理论方法测试量表的维度;(b) 如果缺乏明确的多维结构,则使用项目反应理论方法开发简明的单维量表,并检查不同身份因素下的不同项目和测验功能。在性少数群体成人样本(N = 1 243)中,对 HHRDS 的评估支持简化的 11 个单维测量项目。对差异项目功能的评估表明,在一些项目上,顺性别男性与顺性别女性、顺性别男性与性别多元化个体、同性恋与双性恋+个体、白人/非拉丁裔个体与有色人种之间存在差异。然而,项目功能的差异对测试总分的影响微乎其微,这支持在不同群体中使用修订后的 11 个项目的人类健康状况调查。
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Heterosexist Harassment, Rejection, and Discrimination Scale: Identification of a Unidimensional 11-Item Scale.","authors":"C E Broshek, A J Kurtz, N S Udupa, C J Chang, M L Rogers, B A Feinstein, E A Selby, K L Gratz, M T Tull, T E Joiner, M E Jeon","doi":"10.1177/10731911241293222","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241293222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the Heterosexist Harassment, Rejection, and Discrimination Scale (HHRDS) being a routinely used measure of discrimination, there is no current consensus regarding its fundamental psychometric properties. This study sought to: (a) test the dimensionality of the scale using a classical test theory approach, and (b), if lacking a clear multidimensional structure, use an item response theory approach to develop a concise unidimensional measure and examine differential item and test functioning across various identity factors. In a sample of sexual minority adults (<i>N</i> = 1,243), evaluation of the HHRDS supported a reduced 11-item unidimensional measure. Assessment of differential item functioning suggested differences for some items between cisgender men and cisgender women, cisgender men and gender-diverse individuals, gay/lesbian and bi+ individuals, and white/non-Latine individuals and people of color. However, differential item functioning had minimal impact on total test scores, supporting the use of the revised 11-item HHRDS across groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1142-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MMPI-3 Assessment of Externalizing Psychopathology in Targeted Community and University Samples. MMPI-3 评估目标社区和大学样本的外化心理病理学。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241293939
Martin Sellbom

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) scales that are designed to assess various forms of externalizing psychopathology have received relatively little research attention to date. The goal of this investigation was therefore to examine the validity of these MMPI-3 scales in the measurement of the externalizing spectrum. A community sample (n = 206) with high levels of externalizing psychopathology and a university sample (n = 645) were used. The former sample was administered structured clinical interviews for various forms of externalizing psychopathology, whereas the student sample completed the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory-160. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to operationalize the externalizing spectrum using each set of measures. The results indicated that the externalizing MMPI-3 scales were associated with a general externalizing factor and an expected pattern of associations, while systematic residuals of individual disorder symptoms also emerged. Moreover, in the university sample, specific MMPI-3 scales hypothesized to assess antagonistic-externalizing (Aggressiveness, Aggression, and Cynicism) emerged as key predictors of a callous-aggression residual group factor. The Substance Abuse scale was unsurprisingly the best predictor of such dysfunction. These findings provide guidance for mental health practitioners who use the MMPI-3 for the assessment of externalizing psychopathology symptoms.

明尼苏达多相人格量表-3(MMPI-3)旨在评估各种形式的外化心理病理学,但迄今为止,该量表受到的研究关注相对较少。因此,本调查的目的是研究这些 MMPI-3 量表在测量外化谱方面的有效性。我们使用了一个具有高度外向性精神病理学的社区样本(n = 206)和一个大学样本(n = 645)。前者的样本接受了针对各种形式的外化心理病理学的结构化临床访谈,而学生样本则完成了外化频谱量表-160。我们采用了确认性因素分析法,利用每套测量方法对外化频谱进行操作。结果表明,外化 MMPI-3 量表与一般外化因素和预期的关联模式相关,同时也出现了个别障碍症状的系统残差。此外,在大学样本中,假设用于评估对抗性-外化的特定 MMPI-3 量表(攻击性、侵略性和玩世不恭)成为憎恶-攻击残差群体因子的主要预测因子。药物滥用量表不出意外地是预测此类功能障碍的最佳指标。这些发现为使用 MMPI-3 评估外在化精神病理学症状的心理健康从业者提供了指导。
{"title":"MMPI-3 Assessment of Externalizing Psychopathology in Targeted Community and University Samples.","authors":"Martin Sellbom","doi":"10.1177/10731911241293939","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241293939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) scales that are designed to assess various forms of externalizing psychopathology have received relatively little research attention to date. The goal of this investigation was therefore to examine the validity of these MMPI-3 scales in the measurement of the externalizing spectrum. A community sample (<i>n</i> = 206) with high levels of externalizing psychopathology and a university sample (<i>n</i> = 645) were used. The former sample was administered structured clinical interviews for various forms of externalizing psychopathology, whereas the student sample completed the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory-160. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to operationalize the externalizing spectrum using each set of measures. The results indicated that the externalizing MMPI-3 scales were associated with a general externalizing factor and an expected pattern of associations, while systematic residuals of individual disorder symptoms also emerged. Moreover, in the university sample, specific MMPI-3 scales hypothesized to assess antagonistic-externalizing (Aggressiveness, Aggression, and Cynicism) emerged as key predictors of a callous-aggression residual group factor. The Substance Abuse scale was unsurprisingly the best predictor of such dysfunction. These findings provide guidance for mental health practitioners who use the MMPI-3 for the assessment of externalizing psychopathology symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"995-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397539/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the 10-Item Social Provision Scale (SPS-10): Evaluating Factor Structure, Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Nomological Network Across 38 Countries. 10 项社会供应量表(SPS-10)的验证:评估 38 个国家的因子结构、可靠性、测量不变性和名义网络。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241283609
Philipp E Sischka, Isabelle Albert, Anna E Kornadt

The 24-item Social Provision Scale is among the most frequently used self-report scales to assess perceived social support. A shortened 10-item version (SPS-10) with promising psychometric properties has been proposed. However, so far only a few studies in specific cultural contexts investigated its psychometric properties. Thus, the aim of the current study was an extensive investigation of the psychometric properties of the SPS-10 among 38 countries (N = 88,857 respondents) using the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey data. Item response theory bifactor analysis revealed that the general factor accounts for the largest part of the covariance among the items in all countries (explained common variance ≥ .75) and that the mean/sum score of the SPS-10 can be used as a total score of perceived general social support. Reliability was high for all countries (ρunidimensional GRM ≥ .89). Measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning analysis of the unidimensional graded response model indicated negligible differential test functioning across countries. The association with the external criteria mainly supported its construct validity. The SPS-10 is a psychometrically sound measure of perceived social support for large-scale cross-cultural studies.

24 项社会供给量表是评估感知社会支持最常用的自我报告量表之一。目前已经提出了一个具有良好心理测量特性的 10 个项目的简化版本(SPS-10)。然而,迄今为止,只有少数特定文化背景下的研究对其心理测量特性进行了调查。因此,本研究的目的是利用 COVIDiSTRESS 全球调查数据,在 38 个国家(样本数 = 88,857 名受访者)中对 SPS-10 的心理测量特性进行广泛调查。项目反应理论双因子分析显示,一般因子占所有国家项目间协方差的最大部分(解释的共同方差≥ 0.75),SPS-10 的平均/总分可用作感知到的一般社会支持的总分。所有国家的信度都很高(ρ单维 GRM ≥ 0.89)。单维分级反应模型的测量不变性和项目/测试功能差异分析表明,各国的测试功能差异可以忽略不计。与外部标准的关联主要支持其建构效度。对于大规模的跨文化研究而言,SPS-10 是一种心理测量学上可靠的感知社会支持测量方法。
{"title":"Validation of the 10-Item Social Provision Scale (SPS-10): Evaluating Factor Structure, Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Nomological Network Across 38 Countries.","authors":"Philipp E Sischka, Isabelle Albert, Anna E Kornadt","doi":"10.1177/10731911241283609","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241283609","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 24-item Social Provision Scale is among the most frequently used self-report scales to assess perceived social support. A shortened 10-item version (SPS-10) with promising psychometric properties has been proposed. However, so far only a few studies in specific cultural contexts investigated its psychometric properties. Thus, the aim of the current study was an extensive investigation of the psychometric properties of the SPS-10 among 38 countries (<i>N</i> = 88,857 respondents) using the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey data. Item response theory bifactor analysis revealed that the general factor accounts for the largest part of the covariance among the items in all countries (explained common variance ≥ .75) and that the mean/sum score of the SPS-10 can be used as a total score of perceived general social support. Reliability was high for all countries (ρ<sub>unidimensional GRM</sub> ≥ .89). Measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning analysis of the unidimensional graded response model indicated negligible differential test functioning across countries. The association with the external criteria mainly supported its construct validity. The SPS-10 is a psychometrically sound measure of perceived social support for large-scale cross-cultural studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1027-1048"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gritty Parenting: The Development and Validation of the Parental Grit Scale. 父母的勇气:父母勇气量表的开发与验证》。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241289242
Ziwen Teuber, Jesus Alfonso D Datu, Elouise Botes, Theresa Dicke, Gesine Jordan, Xiaoyu Lan, Dragoş Iliescu, Jiesi Guo, Samuel Greiff

In this study, we aimed to expand the domain specificity of grit by exploring it in the realm of parenting. Parental grit was defined as parents' inclination to demonstrate perseverance, sustained passion, and adaptability in pursuing long-term parenting goals. With longitudinal data from 1,373 U.S. parents, we developed and validated the Parental Grit Scale (PGS) in three phases: item development and revision, establishment of factor structure, and examination of criterion-related and incremental validity. The PGS exhibited a three-factor structure and (partial) scalar measurement invariance across genders, the status of the child's special needs, and measurement occasions. The PGS demonstrated moderate temporal stability. We found evidence of its validity in predicting parental emotional exhaustion, self-efficacy, autonomy support, and parents' perceptions of children's school well-being. Parental grit explained variance in these outcomes beyond domain-general grit and conscientiousness. The PGS has sound psychometric properties and is a valuable measure in the parenting domain.

在这项研究中,我们旨在通过在养育子女的领域中对勇气进行探索,从而扩大勇气的领域特异性。父母的勇气被定义为父母在追求长期养育目标的过程中表现出的毅力、持续的热情和适应能力。利用 1373 位美国家长的纵向数据,我们分三个阶段开发并验证了家长勇气量表(PGS):项目开发与修订、因子结构建立以及标准相关有效性和增量有效性检验。PGS 具有三因素结构,在不同性别、孩子的特殊需求状况和测量场合下具有(部分)标度测量不变性。PGS 具有适度的时间稳定性。我们发现,它在预测父母的情绪衰竭、自我效能感、自主支持以及父母对子女在校幸福感方面具有有效性。父母的勇气对这些结果的解释差异超过了一般领域的勇气和自觉性。PGS 具有良好的心理测量特性,是育儿领域一项有价值的测量指标。
{"title":"Gritty Parenting: The Development and Validation of the Parental Grit Scale.","authors":"Ziwen Teuber, Jesus Alfonso D Datu, Elouise Botes, Theresa Dicke, Gesine Jordan, Xiaoyu Lan, Dragoş Iliescu, Jiesi Guo, Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1177/10731911241289242","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241289242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we aimed to expand the domain specificity of grit by exploring it in the realm of parenting. Parental grit was defined as parents' inclination to demonstrate perseverance, sustained passion, and adaptability in pursuing long-term parenting goals. With longitudinal data from 1,373 U.S. parents, we developed and validated the Parental Grit Scale (PGS) in three phases: item development and revision, establishment of factor structure, and examination of criterion-related and incremental validity. The PGS exhibited a three-factor structure and (partial) scalar measurement invariance across genders, the status of the child's special needs, and measurement occasions. The PGS demonstrated moderate temporal stability. We found evidence of its validity in predicting parental emotional exhaustion, self-efficacy, autonomy support, and parents' perceptions of children's school well-being. Parental grit explained variance in these outcomes beyond domain-general grit and conscientiousness. The PGS has sound psychometric properties and is a valuable measure in the parenting domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1120-1141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factor Structure and Validity of Composite Scores Resulting From a Computerized Cognitive Test Battery in Healthy Adults and Patients With Primary Brain Tumors. 健康成人和原发性脑肿瘤患者计算机认知测试组合综合评分的因子结构和有效性
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241289987
S M Boelders, E Butterbrod, L V D E Vogelsmeier, M M Sitskoorn, L L Ong, K Gehring

Computerized neuropsychological test batteries (CNTs), such as Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS VS), are increasingly used for measuring cognitive functioning, but empirical evidence of how they measure cognition is scarce. We investigated the factor structure of CNS VS using exploratory factor analyses four samples: healthy adults (n = 169), patients with meningioma (392), low-grade glioma (99), and high-grade glioma (247). We tested model fit and investigated measurement invariance. Differences in factor interpretation existed between healthy participants and patients. Factor structures among patient groups were approximately the same but differed in non-zero loadings. Overall, factor structures largely did not support the "clinical domains" provided by CNS VS for clinical interpretation. Confirmatory models did not have a good fit, and measurement invariance could not be established. Our results indicate that (weighted) sum scores of CNS VS results may lack validity. We recommend researchers and clinicians to use scores on individual test measures.

中枢神经系统生命体征(CNS Vital Signs)等计算机化神经心理测试(CNT)越来越多地被用于测量认知功能,但有关它们如何测量认知的实证证据却很少。我们使用探索性因子分析研究了中枢神经系统生命体征的因子结构,包括四个样本:健康成人(169 人)、脑膜瘤患者(392 人)、低级别胶质瘤患者(99 人)和高级别胶质瘤患者(247 人)。我们测试了模型的拟合度,并研究了测量不变性。健康参与者和患者之间的因子解释存在差异。患者组之间的因子结构大致相同,但在非零负荷方面存在差异。总体而言,因子结构在很大程度上不支持 CNS VS 为临床解释提供的 "临床领域"。确认模型的拟合效果不佳,无法建立测量不变性。我们的结果表明,CNS VS 结果的(加权)总分可能缺乏有效性。我们建议研究人员和临床医生使用单项测试的分数。
{"title":"Factor Structure and Validity of Composite Scores Resulting From a Computerized Cognitive Test Battery in Healthy Adults and Patients With Primary Brain Tumors.","authors":"S M Boelders, E Butterbrod, L V D E Vogelsmeier, M M Sitskoorn, L L Ong, K Gehring","doi":"10.1177/10731911241289987","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241289987","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computerized neuropsychological test batteries (CNTs), such as Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS VS), are increasingly used for measuring cognitive functioning, but empirical evidence of how they measure cognition is scarce. We investigated the factor structure of CNS VS using exploratory factor analyses four samples: healthy adults (<i>n</i> = 169), patients with meningioma (392), low-grade glioma (99), and high-grade glioma (247). We tested model fit and investigated measurement invariance. Differences in factor interpretation existed between healthy participants and patients. Factor structures among patient groups were approximately the same but differed in non-zero loadings. Overall, factor structures largely did not support the \"clinical domains\" provided by CNS VS for clinical interpretation. Confirmatory models did not have a good fit, and measurement invariance could not be established. Our results indicate that (weighted) sum scores of CNS VS results may lack validity. We recommend researchers and clinicians to use scores on individual test measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1082-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Prison Samples: A Bass-Ackwards Approach. 监狱样本五面正念问卷的因子结构与构念效度:一个bass - backward方法。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251365742
Carlo Garofalo, Eva Billen, Christine Adams, Patrizia Velotti, Claudia Mazzeschi, Elisa Delvecchio, Steven M Gillespie

The present study examined the factor structure and construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer et al., 2006) in two adult male prison samples from England and Wales (N = 318, Mage = 33.00, SD = 9.53) and Italy (N = 360, Mage = 40.53, SD = 12.20). Bass-Ackwards analysis revealed results generally consistent with the originally intended FFMQ five-factor structure in the England and Wales sample, whereas a four-factor structure (excluding the Describe factor) was the best solution in the Italian sample. Structural problems occurred in both samples, such as negative item-total correlations, items loading on non-target factors, and inconsistent inter-correlations among factors, including negative inter-correlations. Structural equation modeling suggested adequate construct validity with measures of anger, well-being, self-esteem, emotion regulation, dissociation, and impulsivity, but limited discriminant validity across subscales. The findings offer reassurance about the general consistency of results obtained with the original FFMQ subscales in terms of construct validity, while suggesting that inherent issues with FFMQ items may prevent identification of an optimal modeling solution that works across samples. Mindfulness assessment and interventions in prison should embrace multi-method and holistic attention to the broader construct rather than focus on specific components.

本研究在英格兰和威尔士(N = 318, Mage = 33.00, SD = 9.53)和意大利(N = 360, Mage = 40.53, SD = 12.20)两个成年男性监狱样本中检验了五面正念问卷(FFMQ; Baer et al., 2006)的因素结构和结构效度。Bass-Ackwards分析显示,在英格兰和威尔士样本中,结果与最初预期的FFMQ五因素结构基本一致,而在意大利样本中,四因素结构(不包括描述因素)是最佳解决方案。两个样本都存在结构性问题,如项目-总量负相关、项目加载在非目标因素上、因素之间的相互关系不一致,包括负相互关系。结构方程模型表明,愤怒、幸福感、自尊、情绪调节、解离和冲动的结构效度足够,但各子量表的区分效度有限。这些发现为原始FFMQ子量表在结构效度方面获得的结果的总体一致性提供了保证,同时表明FFMQ项目的固有问题可能会阻碍识别跨样本工作的最佳建模解决方案。监狱内的正念评估和干预应包括多方法和对更广泛结构的整体关注,而不是专注于具体组成部分。
{"title":"Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Prison Samples: A Bass-Ackwards Approach.","authors":"Carlo Garofalo, Eva Billen, Christine Adams, Patrizia Velotti, Claudia Mazzeschi, Elisa Delvecchio, Steven M Gillespie","doi":"10.1177/10731911251365742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251365742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined the factor structure and construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer et al., 2006) in two adult male prison samples from England and Wales (<i>N</i> = 318, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 33.00, <i>SD</i> = 9.53) and Italy (<i>N</i> = 360, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 40.53, <i>SD</i> = 12.20). Bass-Ackwards analysis revealed results generally consistent with the originally intended FFMQ five-factor structure in the England and Wales sample, whereas a four-factor structure (excluding the Describe factor) was the best solution in the Italian sample. Structural problems occurred in both samples, such as negative item-total correlations, items loading on non-target factors, and inconsistent inter-correlations among factors, including negative inter-correlations. Structural equation modeling suggested adequate construct validity with measures of anger, well-being, self-esteem, emotion regulation, dissociation, and impulsivity, but limited discriminant validity across subscales. The findings offer reassurance about the general consistency of results obtained with the original FFMQ subscales in terms of construct validity, while suggesting that inherent issues with FFMQ items may prevent identification of an optimal modeling solution that works across samples. Mindfulness assessment and interventions in prison should embrace multi-method and holistic attention to the broader construct rather than focus on specific components.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251365742"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145190768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Creating Scale Measures of Latent Factors: A Genetic Algorithmic Approach. 创建潜在因素的尺度度量:一种遗传算法方法。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251376230
Kelsey L Lowman, Thomas H Costello, Rochelle A Stewart, Keanan J Joyner, Bridget M Bertoldi, Christopher J Patrick

Genetic algorithms (GAs) are quantitative optimization techniques that have exclusively been utilized for scale abbreviation despite their potential application to new scale development. Here, we modeled the trait constructs of the triarchic psychopathy framework (boldness, meanness, disinhibition) as latent factors, and then applied a modified GA to select items for assessing each using model-estimated factor scores as targets. Items for the new scales were selected from a separate construct-relevant inventory, the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment, based on their ability to efficiently index each triarchic factor, with consideration given to scale intercorrelations and item polarity. Structural and item response modeling methods were then used to refine the GA-selected item sets. The resultant EPA-Triarchic scales correlated highly with their target factor scores and exhibited stronger loadings than the pre-existing scale indicators when added into the model. This work, illustrating a GA approach to devising new scales for indexing latent factors, has broad potential applications in clinical assessment.

遗传算法(GAs)是一种定量优化技术,尽管在新尺度开发中具有潜在的应用前景,但目前仅用于尺度简化。在这里,我们将三型精神病框架的特质构建(大胆、卑鄙、去抑制)建模为潜在因素,然后应用改进的遗传算法选择项目,以模型估计的因素得分为目标来评估每个因素。新量表的项目是从一个独立的与构念相关的量表——基本精神病评估——中挑选出来的,基于它们有效索引每个三重因素的能力,并考虑到量表的相互关系和项目极性。然后使用结构和项目反应建模方法来改进ga选择的项目集。所得到的EPA-Triarchic量表与其目标因子得分高度相关,并且在添加到模型中时表现出比先前存在的量表指标更强的负载。这项工作,说明了一种遗传方法来设计新的索引潜在因素的量表,在临床评估中具有广泛的潜在应用。
{"title":"Creating Scale Measures of Latent Factors: A Genetic Algorithmic Approach.","authors":"Kelsey L Lowman, Thomas H Costello, Rochelle A Stewart, Keanan J Joyner, Bridget M Bertoldi, Christopher J Patrick","doi":"10.1177/10731911251376230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251376230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic algorithms (GAs) are quantitative optimization techniques that have exclusively been utilized for scale abbreviation despite their potential application to new scale development. Here, we modeled the trait constructs of the triarchic psychopathy framework (boldness, meanness, disinhibition) as latent factors, and then applied a modified GA to select items for assessing each using model-estimated factor scores as targets. Items for the new scales were selected from a separate construct-relevant inventory, the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment, based on their ability to efficiently index each triarchic factor, with consideration given to scale intercorrelations and item polarity. Structural and item response modeling methods were then used to refine the GA-selected item sets. The resultant EPA-Triarchic scales correlated highly with their target factor scores and exhibited stronger loadings than the pre-existing scale indicators when added into the model. This work, illustrating a GA approach to devising new scales for indexing latent factors, has broad potential applications in clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251376230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145135967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differentiating Memory Deficits in bvFTD, AD, and MCI: A Propensity Score and Volumetric Neuroimaging Analysis of Frontal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions. 区分bvFTD、AD和MCI的记忆缺陷:额叶和内侧颞叶贡献的倾向评分和体积神经影像学分析。
IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251361038
Ricardo Félix Morais, Sara Carvalho, Sofia Vedor, Ricardo Pires, Tiago Jesus, Raquel Lemos, Diana Duro, Marisa Lima, Inês Baldeiras, Tiago Gil Oliveira, Isabel Santana

This study investigated the relative contributions of medial temporal lobe (MTL) integrity and frontal lobe functions in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We assessed 300 participants using neuropsychological memory tests-Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised-and MTL volumetry. Propensity score matching examined which subtests were most influenced by frontal functions. Principal component analysis and ridge regression explored the relationship between MTL volumes and memory tests across groups. Significant differences in memory tests and MTL volumes followed the pattern: controls > MCI > bvFTD > AD. AD showed greater impairment than bvFTD in FCSRT Total (p = .013), Retention (p = .016), and Free Recall (p = .009). Correlations between MTL volumes and memory tests were strongest in MCI (r = -.58), followed by AD (r = -.36), controls (r = -.35), and non-significant in bvFTD (r = -.21). After propensity score matching, several group differences were no longer significant, including cued tasks, delayed recall, and retention. These findings support a continuum of frontal and MTL contributions to memory deficits. AD is primarily marked by MTL-related impairments, which are less pronounced in bvFTD. MTL volumetry influence on these memory tests in MCI underscores their utility in detecting subtle MTL-dependent memory dysfunction.

本研究探讨了内侧颞叶(MTL)完整性和额叶功能在行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)、阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)中的相对作用。我们使用神经心理记忆测试对300名参与者进行了评估——自由和线索选择性提醒测试(FCSRT)、简短视觉空间记忆测试修订和MTL容量法。倾向得分匹配检验了哪些子测试最受额叶功能的影响。主成分分析和岭回归探讨了MTL容量与组间记忆测试之间的关系。记忆测试和MTL容量的显著差异遵循以下模式:控制> MCI > bvFTD > AD。在FCSRT Total中,AD比bvFTD表现出更大的损伤(p =。013),保留率(p =。016)和自由召回(p = .009)。MTL容量与记忆测试之间的相关性在MCI中最强(r = - 0.58),其次是AD (r = - 0.36),对照组(r = - 0.35),而在bvFTD中不显著(r = - 0.21)。在倾向得分匹配后,几个组的差异不再显著,包括提示任务、延迟回忆和保留。这些发现支持了额叶和颞叶颞叶对记忆缺陷的连续贡献。AD主要表现为mtl相关的损伤,这在bvFTD中不太明显。MTL容量测定对MCI患者这些记忆测试的影响强调了它们在检测细微的MTL依赖性记忆功能障碍方面的效用。
{"title":"Differentiating Memory Deficits in bvFTD, AD, and MCI: A Propensity Score and Volumetric Neuroimaging Analysis of Frontal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions.","authors":"Ricardo Félix Morais, Sara Carvalho, Sofia Vedor, Ricardo Pires, Tiago Jesus, Raquel Lemos, Diana Duro, Marisa Lima, Inês Baldeiras, Tiago Gil Oliveira, Isabel Santana","doi":"10.1177/10731911251361038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251361038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relative contributions of medial temporal lobe (MTL) integrity and frontal lobe functions in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We assessed 300 participants using neuropsychological memory tests-Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised-and MTL volumetry. Propensity score matching examined which subtests were most influenced by frontal functions. Principal component analysis and ridge regression explored the relationship between MTL volumes and memory tests across groups. Significant differences in memory tests and MTL volumes followed the pattern: controls > MCI > bvFTD > AD. AD showed greater impairment than bvFTD in FCSRT Total (<i>p</i> = .013), Retention (<i>p</i> = .016), and Free Recall (<i>p</i> = .009). Correlations between MTL volumes and memory tests were strongest in MCI (<i>r</i> = -.58), followed by AD (<i>r</i> = -.36), controls (<i>r</i> = -.35), and non-significant in bvFTD (<i>r</i> = -.21). After propensity score matching, several group differences were no longer significant, including cued tasks, delayed recall, and retention. These findings support a continuum of frontal and MTL contributions to memory deficits. AD is primarily marked by MTL-related impairments, which are less pronounced in bvFTD. MTL volumetry influence on these memory tests in MCI underscores their utility in detecting subtle MTL-dependent memory dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251361038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145135981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1