首页 > 最新文献

British Journal of Sports Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of postpartum physical activity on cardiometabolic health, breastfeeding, injury and infant growth and development: a systematic review and meta-analysis 产后体育锻炼对心脏代谢健康、母乳喂养、伤害和婴儿生长发育的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108483
Paris A T Jones, Amy Moolyk, Stephanie-May Ruchat, Muhammad Usman Ali, Karen Fleming, Sarah Meyer, Talia Noel Sjwed, Jenna B Wowdzia, Lauren Maier, Michelle Mottola, Allison Sivak, Margie H Davenport
Objective To examine the relationship between postpartum physical activity and maternal postnatal cardiometabolic health, breastfeeding, injury, and infant growth and development. Design Systematic review with random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Data sources Eight online databases were searched up until 12 January 2024. Eligibility criteria Studies of all designs in all languages were eligible (except case studies and reviews) if they contained information on the population (postpartum people), intervention (frequency, intensity, duration, volume, or type of exercise, alone (‘exercise-only’) or in combination with other intervention components (eg, dietary; ‘exercise+co-intervention’), comparator (no or low volumes of physical activity), and outcomes: hypertension, diabetes, cardiometabolic risk factors (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol, high density lipoproteins, low density lipoproteins, and triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), glucose and insulin concentration), breastfeeding (breast milk quality and volume), infant growth (length and weight) and development, or postpartum injury. Results 46 unique studies (n=8766 participants) from 20 countries were included. Moderate certainty of evidence showed exercise+co-interventions reduced the odds of developing diabetes by 28% (7 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), n=2496; OR 0.72 95% CI 0.54, 0.98, I2 12%), reduced SBP (10 RCTs, n=2753; mean difference (MD) −2.15 95% CI −3.89 to –0.40, I2 73%) and DBP (9 RCTs, n=2575; MD −1.38 95% CI −2.60 to –0.15, I2 66%) compared with controls. Infant growth and development, breast milk quality and quantity, and risk of injury were not different between exercise and control groups. Conclusions Physical activity improves cardiometabolic health without adversely impacting breast milk supply or quality, infant growth or maternal injury. Data are available upon reasonable request.
目的 研究产后体力活动与产妇产后心脏代谢健康、母乳喂养、损伤以及婴儿生长发育之间的关系。设计 采用随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归进行系统回顾。数据来源 搜索了截至 2024 年 1 月 12 日的 8 个在线数据库。资格标准 所有语言、所有设计的研究(案例研究和综述除外),只要包含有关人群(产后人群)、干预措施(频率、强度、持续时间、运动量或运动类型,单独("纯运动")或与其他干预措施(如饮食;"运动+联合干预")相结合)、参照物(无运动量或运动量较小)和结果的信息,均符合资格:高血压、糖尿病、心脏代谢风险因素(收缩压 (SBP)、舒张压 (DBP)、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白和甘油三酯、糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1C)、葡萄糖和胰岛素浓度)、母乳喂养(母乳质量和量)、婴儿生长(身长和体重)和发育或产后损伤。结果 纳入了来自 20 个国家的 46 项研究(n=8766 名参与者)。中度确定性证据显示,运动+联合干预可将糖尿病发病几率降低 28%(7 项随机对照试验,n=2496;OR 0.72 95% CI 0.54, 0.98,I2 12%),与对照组相比,降低了 SBP(10 项随机对照试验,n=2753;平均差 (MD) -2.15 95% CI -3.89 至 -0.40,I2 73%)和 DBP(9 项随机对照试验,n=2575;MD -1.38 95% CI -2.60 至 -0.15,I2 66%)。运动组和对照组在婴儿生长发育、母乳质量和数量以及受伤风险方面没有差异。结论 体育锻炼可改善心脏代谢健康,但不会对母乳供应或质量、婴儿生长或产妇受伤产生不利影响。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
{"title":"Impact of postpartum physical activity on cardiometabolic health, breastfeeding, injury and infant growth and development: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Paris A T Jones, Amy Moolyk, Stephanie-May Ruchat, Muhammad Usman Ali, Karen Fleming, Sarah Meyer, Talia Noel Sjwed, Jenna B Wowdzia, Lauren Maier, Michelle Mottola, Allison Sivak, Margie H Davenport","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108483","url":null,"abstract":"Objective To examine the relationship between postpartum physical activity and maternal postnatal cardiometabolic health, breastfeeding, injury, and infant growth and development. Design Systematic review with random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Data sources Eight online databases were searched up until 12 January 2024. Eligibility criteria Studies of all designs in all languages were eligible (except case studies and reviews) if they contained information on the population (postpartum people), intervention (frequency, intensity, duration, volume, or type of exercise, alone (‘exercise-only’) or in combination with other intervention components (eg, dietary; ‘exercise+co-intervention’), comparator (no or low volumes of physical activity), and outcomes: hypertension, diabetes, cardiometabolic risk factors (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol, high density lipoproteins, low density lipoproteins, and triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), glucose and insulin concentration), breastfeeding (breast milk quality and volume), infant growth (length and weight) and development, or postpartum injury. Results 46 unique studies (n=8766 participants) from 20 countries were included. Moderate certainty of evidence showed exercise+co-interventions reduced the odds of developing diabetes by 28% (7 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), n=2496; OR 0.72 95% CI 0.54, 0.98, I2 12%), reduced SBP (10 RCTs, n=2753; mean difference (MD) −2.15 95% CI −3.89 to –0.40, I2 73%) and DBP (9 RCTs, n=2575; MD −1.38 95% CI −2.60 to –0.15, I2 66%) compared with controls. Infant growth and development, breast milk quality and quantity, and risk of injury were not different between exercise and control groups. Conclusions Physical activity improves cardiometabolic health without adversely impacting breast milk supply or quality, infant growth or maternal injury. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142384147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mechanisms of hypoxia (in)tolerance in prematurely born adults: PhD thesis (PhD Academy Award). 早产成人的缺氧(不)耐受机制:博士论文(博士学院奖)。
IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108881
Giorgio Manferdelli
{"title":"Mechanisms of hypoxia (in)tolerance in prematurely born adults: PhD thesis (PhD Academy Award).","authors":"Giorgio Manferdelli","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108881","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142370970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction:Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study 更正:变性运动员的力量、功率和有氧能力:一项横断面研究
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-108029corr1
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine
Hamilton B, Brown A, Montagner-Moraes S, et al . Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2024;58:586-97. There is an error in the calculations of Absolute Peak Power (W), Relative Peak Power to Fat-Free …
Hamilton B, Brown A, Montagner-Moraes S, et al .变性运动员的力量、功率和有氧能力:横断面研究》。英国运动医学杂志》2024;58:586-97。绝对峰值功率(W)、相对峰值功率与去脂率(Fat-Free Power)的计算存在错误。
{"title":"Correction:Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study","authors":"BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2023-108029corr1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-108029corr1","url":null,"abstract":"Hamilton B, Brown A, Montagner-Moraes S, et al . Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2024;58:586-97. There is an error in the calculations of Absolute Peak Power (W), Relative Peak Power to Fat-Free …","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142444049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sport & Exercise Medicine in Switzerland (SEMS) turns 75 瑞士运动医学协会(SEMS)成立 75 周年
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-109207
Boris Gojanovic
‘Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning’ (Albert Einstein). On 14 and 15 November 2024, Sport and Exercise Medicine in Switzerland (SEMS) will host a special SEMS annual meeting, celebrating 75 years of sports medicine in Switzerland. While we all consider SEM a young specialty, one that is still not recognised as a full medical specialty in many countries around the world (including Switzerland), we also must acknowledge the trailblazing efforts of European countries at the start of the 20th century to bring SEM to life. In 1928, Switzerland hosted the St Moritz Winter Olympic Games. The event gave the impetus to the reunion of pioneers from 11 European countries, which led to the formation of the ‘Association Internationale Médico-Sportive’ (AIMS; today Fédération Internationale de Médecine du Sport or FIMS), with a Swiss as its first President. It would, however, take 20 or more years for most countries to develop national organised SEM societies, due to the troubled 1930s and 1940s. As we look back …
从昨天学习,为今天而活,为明天而希望。重要的是不要停止质疑"(阿尔伯特-爱因斯坦)。2024 年 11 月 14 日和 15 日,瑞士运动与锻炼医学(SEMS)将举办一次特别的 SEMS 年会,庆祝运动医学在瑞士发展 75 周年。虽然我们都认为 SEM 是一个年轻的专业,在世界许多国家(包括瑞士)仍未被认可为一个完整的医学专业,但我们也必须承认欧洲国家在 20 世纪初为使 SEM 诞生而做出的开拓性努力。1928 年,瑞士举办了圣莫里茨冬季奥运会。这次活动推动了 11 个欧洲国家的先驱者再次聚首,最终成立了 "国际体育运动医学协会"(AIMS,即今天的国际体育运动医学联合会或 FIMS),并由一名瑞士人担任首任主席。然而,由于 20 世纪 30 年代和 40 年代的动荡,大多数国家需要 20 年或更长的时间才能发展起全国性的有组织的 SEM 协会。回顾历史
{"title":"Sport & Exercise Medicine in Switzerland (SEMS) turns 75","authors":"Boris Gojanovic","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-109207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-109207","url":null,"abstract":"‘Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning’ (Albert Einstein). On 14 and 15 November 2024, Sport and Exercise Medicine in Switzerland (SEMS) will host a special SEMS annual meeting, celebrating 75 years of sports medicine in Switzerland. While we all consider SEM a young specialty, one that is still not recognised as a full medical specialty in many countries around the world (including Switzerland), we also must acknowledge the trailblazing efforts of European countries at the start of the 20th century to bring SEM to life. In 1928, Switzerland hosted the St Moritz Winter Olympic Games. The event gave the impetus to the reunion of pioneers from 11 European countries, which led to the formation of the ‘Association Internationale Médico-Sportive’ (AIMS; today Fédération Internationale de Médecine du Sport or FIMS), with a Swiss as its first President. It would, however, take 20 or more years for most countries to develop national organised SEM societies, due to the troubled 1930s and 1940s. As we look back …","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142444240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers and enablers of adherence to high-intensity interval training among patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis 癌症患者坚持高强度间歇训练的障碍和促进因素:系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108163
Behnaz Mahdaviani, Maryam Selk-Ghaffari, Mojdeh Sarzaeim, Jane S Thornton
Objective Physical activity confers physical and psychosocial benefits for cancer patients and decreases morbidity and mortality, but adherence varies. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is time-efficient and may improve adherence. Our aim was to determine barriers and enablers of adherence to HIIT in patients diagnosed with cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data source PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria Intervention studies including patients diagnosed with any type of cancer, who engaged in HIIT with or without co-intervention in any stage of treatment and have reported outcomes for adherence. Results Eight hundred articles were screened and 22 were included (n=807); 19 were included in the meta-analysis (n=755). Weighted adherence to HIIT was 88% (95% CI, 81% to 94%). None of the studies reported serious adverse events. Although being a woman and having breast cancer were associated with lower adherence (p<0.05), age was not (p=0.15). Adherence was significantly lower during the treatment phase in comparison with pre- and post-treatment phases, 83% versus 94% and 96%, respectively (p<0.001). Session time of more than 60 min, when unsupervised and combined with other interventions, was associated with decreased adherence (p<0.05). Conclusion Adherence to HIIT programmes among cancer patients varies and is improved when the intervention is supervised, of shorter duration, consists of solely HIIT and not in combination with other exercise and occurs during pre- and post-treatment phases. Strategies to improve adherence to HIIT in specific subpopulations may be needed to ensure all patients with cancer are provided optimal opportunities to reap the benefits associated with physical activity. PROSPERO registration CRD42023430180. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
目的 体育锻炼可为癌症患者带来身体和心理上的益处,并降低发病率和死亡率,但坚持体育锻炼的程度却不尽相同。高强度间歇训练(HIIT)具有时间效率高的特点,可以提高坚持率。我们的目的是确定癌症患者坚持 HIIT 的障碍和促进因素。设计 系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源:PubMed-MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science。资格标准 包括确诊为任何类型癌症的患者的干预研究,这些患者在治疗的任何阶段都参与了 HIIT(有或没有联合干预),并报告了坚持的结果。结果 筛选出 800 篇文章,其中 22 篇被纳入(n=807);19 篇被纳入荟萃分析(n=755)。HIIT的加权坚持率为88%(95% CI,81%至94%)。所有研究均未报告严重不良事件。虽然女性和乳腺癌患者的坚持率较低(P<0.05),但年龄与之无关(P=0.15)。与治疗前和治疗后阶段相比,治疗阶段的依从性明显较低,分别为 83% 对 94% 和 96%(p<0.001)。在无人监督的情况下,如果训练时间超过 60 分钟,并与其他干预措施相结合,则坚持率会降低(p<0.05)。结论 癌症患者对 HIIT 计划的依从性各不相同,如果干预有监督、持续时间较短、只包括 HIIT 而不与其他运动相结合,并且在治疗前和治疗后阶段进行,则依从性会提高。可能需要制定策略来提高特定亚人群对 HIIT 的依从性,以确保所有癌症患者都有最佳机会获得与体育锻炼相关的益处。PROSPERO 注册号为 CRD42023430180。与该研究相关的所有数据均包含在文章中或作为补充信息上传。
{"title":"Barriers and enablers of adherence to high-intensity interval training among patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Behnaz Mahdaviani, Maryam Selk-Ghaffari, Mojdeh Sarzaeim, Jane S Thornton","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108163","url":null,"abstract":"Objective Physical activity confers physical and psychosocial benefits for cancer patients and decreases morbidity and mortality, but adherence varies. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is time-efficient and may improve adherence. Our aim was to determine barriers and enablers of adherence to HIIT in patients diagnosed with cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data source PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria Intervention studies including patients diagnosed with any type of cancer, who engaged in HIIT with or without co-intervention in any stage of treatment and have reported outcomes for adherence. Results Eight hundred articles were screened and 22 were included (n=807); 19 were included in the meta-analysis (n=755). Weighted adherence to HIIT was 88% (95% CI, 81% to 94%). None of the studies reported serious adverse events. Although being a woman and having breast cancer were associated with lower adherence (p<0.05), age was not (p=0.15). Adherence was significantly lower during the treatment phase in comparison with pre- and post-treatment phases, 83% versus 94% and 96%, respectively (p<0.001). Session time of more than 60 min, when unsupervised and combined with other interventions, was associated with decreased adherence (p<0.05). Conclusion Adherence to HIIT programmes among cancer patients varies and is improved when the intervention is supervised, of shorter duration, consists of solely HIIT and not in combination with other exercise and occurs during pre- and post-treatment phases. Strategies to improve adherence to HIIT in specific subpopulations may be needed to ensure all patients with cancer are provided optimal opportunities to reap the benefits associated with physical activity. PROSPERO registration CRD42023430180. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142329056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contemporary national and international guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for people living with chronic conditions, disability and advanced age: a scoping review 关于慢性病患者、残疾人和高龄者体育活动和久坐行为的当代国家和国际指南:范围界定审查
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108247
Mark P Ranasinghe, Harrison Andersen, Ruby K Dempsey, Noah Wexler, Rochelle Davis, Monique Francois, Stephen Gilbert, Anthony David Okely, Catherine Sherrington, Paddy C Dempsey
Objectives Physical activity guidelines inform policy and practice in promoting healthier lifestyles. The WHO advocates for distinct recommendations for each country to address variation in needs, resources and context. Specific regional recommendations for three underactive populations facing unique barriers to movement are lacking—people with chronic conditions, disability and advanced age. We review which countries/regions provide specific physical activity guidelines for these populations to identify deficiencies in meeting WHO recommendations and inform future directions for guideline development. Design Scoping review. Data sources OVID Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest, CINAHL, Google searches, targeted websites. Eligibility criteria Data sources were searched from database inception to September 2023 to identify community-facing physical activity guidelines at the national/international level for these populations. We recorded, summarised and analysed physical activity guideline recommendations extracted from published guideline documents, organised by population and country/region. Results 66 articles were identified, addressing 28 distinct countries/regions, including four international guidelines, published from 2009 to 2023. The WHO guidelines were adopted by 19 countries and the European Union. Across all regions, a lack of specific advice was identified for individuals with chronic conditions (46%), disability (46%) and advanced age (11%). Advice for chronic conditions and disability commonly replicated general adult population advice. Conclusion Many countries/regions do not produce physical activity guidelines specific to populations with chronic conditions and disability. As such, a large proportion of countries/regions failed to meet WHO recommendations, highlighting a lack of customised advice to address unique barriers faced by vulnerable populations. No data are available. Not applicable.
目标 体育活动指南为促进更健康生活方式的政策和实践提供信息。世卫组织主张为每个国家提供不同的建议,以应对需求、资源和环境方面的差异。目前还缺乏针对三种面临独特运动障碍的活动不足人群(慢性病患者、残疾人和高龄者)的具体地区建议。我们审查了哪些国家/地区为这些人群提供了具体的体育锻炼指南,以确定在满足世卫组织建议方面存在的不足,并为今后的指南制定工作指明方向。设计 范围界定审查。数据来源:OVID Medline、PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、Google Scholar、ProQuest、CINAHL、Google 搜索、目标网站。资格标准 搜索从数据库开始到 2023 年 9 月的数据源,以确定国家/国际层面针对这些人群的社区体育活动指南。我们记录、总结并分析了从已发布的指南文件中提取的体育活动指南建议,并按人群和国家/地区进行了分类。结果 共找到 66 篇文章,涉及 28 个不同的国家/地区,其中包括 2009 年至 2023 年间出版的 4 份国际指南。19个国家和欧盟采用了世卫组织的指南。在所有地区中,发现缺乏针对慢性病患者(46%)、残疾患者(46%)和高龄患者(11%)的具体建议。针对慢性病患者和残疾人的建议通常与普通成年人的建议相同。结论 许多国家/地区都没有制定专门针对慢性病患者和残疾人的体育锻炼指南。因此,很大一部分国家/地区未能达到世卫组织的建议,这突出表明缺乏针对弱势群体所面临的独特障碍的定制建议。无数据。不适用。
{"title":"Contemporary national and international guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for people living with chronic conditions, disability and advanced age: a scoping review","authors":"Mark P Ranasinghe, Harrison Andersen, Ruby K Dempsey, Noah Wexler, Rochelle Davis, Monique Francois, Stephen Gilbert, Anthony David Okely, Catherine Sherrington, Paddy C Dempsey","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108247","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Physical activity guidelines inform policy and practice in promoting healthier lifestyles. The WHO advocates for distinct recommendations for each country to address variation in needs, resources and context. Specific regional recommendations for three underactive populations facing unique barriers to movement are lacking—people with chronic conditions, disability and advanced age. We review which countries/regions provide specific physical activity guidelines for these populations to identify deficiencies in meeting WHO recommendations and inform future directions for guideline development. Design Scoping review. Data sources OVID Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest, CINAHL, Google searches, targeted websites. Eligibility criteria Data sources were searched from database inception to September 2023 to identify community-facing physical activity guidelines at the national/international level for these populations. We recorded, summarised and analysed physical activity guideline recommendations extracted from published guideline documents, organised by population and country/region. Results 66 articles were identified, addressing 28 distinct countries/regions, including four international guidelines, published from 2009 to 2023. The WHO guidelines were adopted by 19 countries and the European Union. Across all regions, a lack of specific advice was identified for individuals with chronic conditions (46%), disability (46%) and advanced age (11%). Advice for chronic conditions and disability commonly replicated general adult population advice. Conclusion Many countries/regions do not produce physical activity guidelines specific to populations with chronic conditions and disability. As such, a large proportion of countries/regions failed to meet WHO recommendations, highlighting a lack of customised advice to address unique barriers faced by vulnerable populations. No data are available. Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142328608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal tears: 10-year follow-up of the OMEX randomised controlled trial 关节镜下半月板部分切除术与运动疗法治疗退行性半月板撕裂:OMEX随机对照试验10年随访
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108644
Bjørnar Berg, Ewa M Roos, Martin Englund, Nina Jullum Kise, Lars Engebretsen, Cathrine Nørstad Eftang, May Arna Risberg
Objective To evaluate radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression, development of knee OA, patient-reported outcomes and knee muscle strength at 10-year follow-up after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) or exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal tears. Methods Randomised controlled trial including 140 participants, with a degenerative meniscal tear and no or minimal radiographic OA changes. Participants were randomised to either APM or 12 weeks of exercise therapy (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome was knee OA progression assessed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas sum score (sum of medial and lateral compartment joint space narrowing and osteophyte score). Secondary outcomes included incidence of radiographic and symptomatic knee OA, patient-reported pain and knee function and isokinetic knee muscle strength. Results The adjusted mean difference in change in the OARSI sum score was 0.39 (95% CI −0.19 to 0.97), with more progression in the APM group. The incidence of radiographic knee OA was 23% in the APM group and 20% in the exercise group (adjusted risk difference 3% (95% CI −13% to 19%)). No clinically relevant differences were found in patient-reported outcomes or isokinetic knee muscle strength. Conclusion No differences in radiographic knee OA progression and comparable rates of knee OA development were observed 10 years following APM and exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal tears. Both treatments were associated with improved patient-reported pain and knee function. Trial registration number [NCT01002794][1]. Data are available on reasonable request. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01002794&atom=%2Fbjsports%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F26%2Fbjsports-2024-108644.atom
目的 评估关节镜下半月板部分切除术(APM)或运动疗法治疗退行性半月板撕裂后,10 年随访期间膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的影像学进展、膝关节 OA 的发展、患者报告的结果以及膝关节肌肉力量。方法 随机对照试验,包括140名半月板退行性撕裂且无或仅有轻微放射学OA变化的参与者。参与者被随机分配接受半月板切除术或12周的运动疗法(1:1的比例)。主要结果是通过国际骨关节炎研究学会(OARSI)的 Atlas 总分(内侧和外侧室关节间隙狭窄和骨质增生评分之和)评估膝关节 OA 的进展情况。次要结果包括影像学和无症状膝关节OA的发生率、患者报告的疼痛和膝关节功能以及等速膝关节肌力。结果 OARSI总分变化的调整后平均差异为0.39(95% CI -0.19至0.97),APM组的变化更大。膝关节放射学 OA 的发生率在 APM 组为 23%,在锻炼组为 20%(调整后风险差异为 3%(95% CI -13%-19%))。在患者报告的结果或膝关节等动肌力方面未发现临床相关差异。结论 对退行性半月板撕裂进行 APM 和运动疗法治疗 10 年后,膝关节 OA 的影像学进展无差异,膝关节 OA 的发生率相当。两种疗法都能改善患者报告的疼痛和膝关节功能。试验注册号[NCT01002794][1]。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。[1]:/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01002794&atom=%2Fbjsports%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F26%2Fbjsports-2024-108644.atom
{"title":"Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal tears: 10-year follow-up of the OMEX randomised controlled trial","authors":"Bjørnar Berg, Ewa M Roos, Martin Englund, Nina Jullum Kise, Lars Engebretsen, Cathrine Nørstad Eftang, May Arna Risberg","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108644","url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression, development of knee OA, patient-reported outcomes and knee muscle strength at 10-year follow-up after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) or exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal tears. Methods Randomised controlled trial including 140 participants, with a degenerative meniscal tear and no or minimal radiographic OA changes. Participants were randomised to either APM or 12 weeks of exercise therapy (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome was knee OA progression assessed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas sum score (sum of medial and lateral compartment joint space narrowing and osteophyte score). Secondary outcomes included incidence of radiographic and symptomatic knee OA, patient-reported pain and knee function and isokinetic knee muscle strength. Results The adjusted mean difference in change in the OARSI sum score was 0.39 (95% CI −0.19 to 0.97), with more progression in the APM group. The incidence of radiographic knee OA was 23% in the APM group and 20% in the exercise group (adjusted risk difference 3% (95% CI −13% to 19%)). No clinically relevant differences were found in patient-reported outcomes or isokinetic knee muscle strength. Conclusion No differences in radiographic knee OA progression and comparable rates of knee OA development were observed 10 years following APM and exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal tears. Both treatments were associated with improved patient-reported pain and knee function. Trial registration number [NCT01002794][1]. Data are available on reasonable request. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01002794&atom=%2Fbjsports%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F26%2Fbjsports-2024-108644.atom","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142325141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Back pain Knowledge and beliefs Survey (BacKS): development and assessment of measurement properties 背痛知识与信念调查(BacKS):开发与测量特性评估
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108364
Leticia Amaral Corrêa, Mark Hancock, Stephanie Mathieson, Arianne Verhagen, Ben Darlow, Paul William Hodges, Simon French
Objective To develop and evaluate a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess people’s knowledge and beliefs about low back pain. Methods This study followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines. An 18-item preliminary version of the Back pain Knowledge and beliefs Survey (BacKS) was generated based on evidence-based key messages and current clinical guidelines for low back pain. Four items were added following input from three consumers and seven experts. Focus groups (n=9) confirmed content validity. The 22-item version was completed by 258 Australian-based adults (>18 years) with self-reported low back pain. A follow-up survey was sent 1 week later. The following measurement properties were evaluated to produce, and then assess the final version of BacKS: structural validity (exploratory factor analysis); internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient); measurement error (Smallest Detectable Change); construct validity (hypothesis tested: moderate positive Pearson correlation between BacKS and Back Beliefs Questionnaire); plus, interpretability and feasibility. Results The final BacKS comprised 20 items with a 2-factor structure (biomedical factor: 9 items, score ranging from 9 to 45, and self-care factor: 11 items, score ranging from 11 to 55). Internal consistency and reliability were adequate (>0.70) for each factor. Smallest detectable change was 4.4 (biomedical factor) and 7.0 (self-care factor). Our construct validity hypothesis was confirmed (Pearson correlation=0.53). No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Conclusion The BacKS is a valid, reliable and feasible PROM to measure knowledge and beliefs about low back pain in clinical practice and research settings. Data are available on reasonable request.
目的 开发并评估一种新的患者报告结果测量法(PROM),以评估人们对腰背痛的认识和信念。方法 本研究遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准指南。根据以证据为基础的关键信息和当前的腰背痛临床指南,制作了 18 个项目的腰背痛知识和信念调查 (BacKS) 初版。根据三位消费者和七位专家的意见,增加了四个项目。焦点小组(9 人)确认了内容的有效性。258 名澳大利亚成年人(18 岁以上)完成了 22 个项目的版本,并自述有腰背痛。一周后进行了后续调查。在制作和评估 BacKS 最终版本时,对以下测量属性进行了评估:结构效度(探索性因子分析);内部一致性(克朗巴赫α);测试-再测可靠性(类内相关系数);测量误差(最小可测变化);构建效度(假设检验:BacKS 与背部信念问卷之间存在适度的皮尔逊正相关);以及可解释性和可行性。结果 最终的 BacKS 包括 20 个项目,具有双因子结构(生物医学因子:9 个项目,得分范围为 9-45 分;自我保健因子:11 个项目,得分范围为 11-55 分)。每个因子的内部一致性和信度均符合要求(大于 0.70)。可检测到的最小变化为 4.4(生物医学因子)和 7.0(自我保健因子)。我们的构造效度假设得到了证实(Pearson 相关性=0.53)。没有发现最低或最高效应。结论 BacKS 是一种有效、可靠和可行的 PROM,可用于测量临床实践和研究环境中有关腰背痛的知识和信念。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
{"title":"Back pain Knowledge and beliefs Survey (BacKS): development and assessment of measurement properties","authors":"Leticia Amaral Corrêa, Mark Hancock, Stephanie Mathieson, Arianne Verhagen, Ben Darlow, Paul William Hodges, Simon French","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108364","url":null,"abstract":"Objective To develop and evaluate a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess people’s knowledge and beliefs about low back pain. Methods This study followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines. An 18-item preliminary version of the Back pain Knowledge and beliefs Survey (BacKS) was generated based on evidence-based key messages and current clinical guidelines for low back pain. Four items were added following input from three consumers and seven experts. Focus groups (n=9) confirmed content validity. The 22-item version was completed by 258 Australian-based adults (>18 years) with self-reported low back pain. A follow-up survey was sent 1 week later. The following measurement properties were evaluated to produce, and then assess the final version of BacKS: structural validity (exploratory factor analysis); internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient); measurement error (Smallest Detectable Change); construct validity (hypothesis tested: moderate positive Pearson correlation between BacKS and Back Beliefs Questionnaire); plus, interpretability and feasibility. Results The final BacKS comprised 20 items with a 2-factor structure (biomedical factor: 9 items, score ranging from 9 to 45, and self-care factor: 11 items, score ranging from 11 to 55). Internal consistency and reliability were adequate (>0.70) for each factor. Smallest detectable change was 4.4 (biomedical factor) and 7.0 (self-care factor). Our construct validity hypothesis was confirmed (Pearson correlation=0.53). No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Conclusion The BacKS is a valid, reliable and feasible PROM to measure knowledge and beliefs about low back pain in clinical practice and research settings. Data are available on reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142317618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single case experimental design: a rigorous method for addressing inequity and enhancing precision within Para sport and exercise medicine research. 单例实验设计:解决不公平现象和提高残疾人运动与锻炼医学研究精确性的严格方法。
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108587
Sean Tweedy,Iain Mayank Dutia,John Cairney,Emma Beckman
{"title":"Single case experimental design: a rigorous method for addressing inequity and enhancing precision within Para sport and exercise medicine research.","authors":"Sean Tweedy,Iain Mayank Dutia,John Cairney,Emma Beckman","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108587","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142275170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ICON 2023: International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus – the core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy (COS-AT) using a systematic review and a Delphi study of professional participants and patients ICON 2023:国际科学肌腱病研讨会共识--跟腱病核心结果集 (COS-AT),通过对专业参与者和患者进行系统回顾和德尔菲研究得出结论
IF 18.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108263
Robert-Jan de Vos, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Peter Malliaras, Tjerk Sleeswijk Visser, Hakan Alfredson, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Mathijs van Ark, Annelie Brorsson, Ruth Chimenti, Sean Docking, Pernilla Eliasson, Kenneth Farnqvist, Zubair Haleem, Shawn L Hanlon, Jean-Francois Kaux, Rebecca Samantha Kearney, Paul D Kirwan, Kornelia Kulig, Bhavesh Kumar, Trevor Lewis, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Tun Hing Lui, Nicola Maffulli, Adrian James Mallows, Lorenzo Masci, Dennis McGonagle, Dylan Morrissey, Myles Calder Murphy, Richard Newsham-West, Katarina Maria Nilsson-Helander, Richard Norris, Francesco Oliva, Seth O’Neill, Koen Peers, Ebonie Kendra Rio, Igor Sancho, Alex Scott, Kayla D Seymore, Sze-Ee Soh, Patrick Vallance, Jan A N Verhaar, Arco C van der Vlist, Adam Weir, Jennifer Ann Zellers, Bill Vicenzino
To develop a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy (COS-AT) for use in clinical trials we performed a five-step process including (1) a systematic review of available outcome measurement instruments, (2) an online survey on truth and feasibility of the available measurement instruments, (3) an assessment of the methodological quality of the selected outcome measurement instruments, (4) an online survey on the outcome measurement instruments as COS and (5) a consensus in-person meeting. Both surveys were completed by healthcare professionals and patients. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology guidelines with a 70% threshold for consensus were followed. We identified 233 different outcome measurement instruments from 307 included studies; 177 were mapped within the International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus core domains. 31 participants (12 patients) completed the first online survey (response rate 94%). 22/177 (12%) outcome measurement instruments were deemed truthful and feasible and their measurement properties were evaluated. 29 participants (12 patients) completed the second online survey (response rate 88%) and three outcome measurement instruments were endorsed: the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire, the single-leg heel rise test and evaluating pain after activity using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0–10). 12 participants (1 patient) attended the final consensus meeting, and 1 additional outcome measurement instrument was endorsed: evaluating pain during activity/loading using a VAS (0–10). It is recommended that the identified COS-AT will be used in future clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention. This will facilitate comparing outcomes of intervention strategies, data pooling and further progression of knowledge about AT. As COS-AT is implemented, further evidence on measurement properties of included measures and new outcome measurement instruments should lead to its review and refinement.
为了开发用于临床试验的跟腱病核心结果集(COS-AT),我们进行了五步流程,包括:(1)对现有结果测量工具进行系统回顾;(2)对现有测量工具的真实性和可行性进行在线调查;(3)对所选结果测量工具的方法学质量进行评估;(4)对作为 COS 的结果测量工具进行在线调查;(5)召开一次达成共识的现场会议。这两项调查均由医护人员和患者完成。我们遵循了《风湿病学结果测量指南》的规定,共识的阈值为 70%。我们从 307 项纳入的研究中确定了 233 种不同的结果测量工具;其中 177 种被映射到国际科学腱鞘炎研讨会共识核心领域中。31 名参与者(12 名患者)完成了首次在线调查(回复率为 94%)。22/177(12%)项结果测量工具被认为真实可行,并对其测量特性进行了评估。29 名参与者(12 名患者)完成了第二次在线调查(回复率为 88%),并认可了三种结果测量工具:维多利亚运动评估研究所-跟腱问卷、单腿跟腱抬高测试和使用视觉模拟量表(VAS,0-10)评估活动后疼痛。12 名与会者(1 名患者)参加了最终的共识会议,会议还认可了另外一种结果测量工具:使用视觉模拟量表(VAS,0-10)评估活动/负重期间的疼痛。建议在未来评估干预效果的临床试验中使用已确定的 COS-AT。这将有助于比较干预策略的结果、汇集数据和进一步增进对反关节炎的了解。随着 COS-AT 的实施,有关所含测量指标的测量特性和新的结果测量工具的进一步证据应有助于对其进行审查和完善。
{"title":"ICON 2023: International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus – the core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy (COS-AT) using a systematic review and a Delphi study of professional participants and patients","authors":"Robert-Jan de Vos, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Peter Malliaras, Tjerk Sleeswijk Visser, Hakan Alfredson, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Mathijs van Ark, Annelie Brorsson, Ruth Chimenti, Sean Docking, Pernilla Eliasson, Kenneth Farnqvist, Zubair Haleem, Shawn L Hanlon, Jean-Francois Kaux, Rebecca Samantha Kearney, Paul D Kirwan, Kornelia Kulig, Bhavesh Kumar, Trevor Lewis, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Tun Hing Lui, Nicola Maffulli, Adrian James Mallows, Lorenzo Masci, Dennis McGonagle, Dylan Morrissey, Myles Calder Murphy, Richard Newsham-West, Katarina Maria Nilsson-Helander, Richard Norris, Francesco Oliva, Seth O’Neill, Koen Peers, Ebonie Kendra Rio, Igor Sancho, Alex Scott, Kayla D Seymore, Sze-Ee Soh, Patrick Vallance, Jan A N Verhaar, Arco C van der Vlist, Adam Weir, Jennifer Ann Zellers, Bill Vicenzino","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108263","url":null,"abstract":"To develop a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy (COS-AT) for use in clinical trials we performed a five-step process including (1) a systematic review of available outcome measurement instruments, (2) an online survey on truth and feasibility of the available measurement instruments, (3) an assessment of the methodological quality of the selected outcome measurement instruments, (4) an online survey on the outcome measurement instruments as COS and (5) a consensus in-person meeting. Both surveys were completed by healthcare professionals and patients. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology guidelines with a 70% threshold for consensus were followed. We identified 233 different outcome measurement instruments from 307 included studies; 177 were mapped within the International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus core domains. 31 participants (12 patients) completed the first online survey (response rate 94%). 22/177 (12%) outcome measurement instruments were deemed truthful and feasible and their measurement properties were evaluated. 29 participants (12 patients) completed the second online survey (response rate 88%) and three outcome measurement instruments were endorsed: the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire, the single-leg heel rise test and evaluating pain after activity using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0–10). 12 participants (1 patient) attended the final consensus meeting, and 1 additional outcome measurement instrument was endorsed: evaluating pain during activity/loading using a VAS (0–10). It is recommended that the identified COS-AT will be used in future clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention. This will facilitate comparing outcomes of intervention strategies, data pooling and further progression of knowledge about AT. As COS-AT is implemented, further evidence on measurement properties of included measures and new outcome measurement instruments should lead to its review and refinement.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"185 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142231289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
British Journal of Sports Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1