首页 > 最新文献

British journal of psychology最新文献

英文 中文
How AI can advance psychological science. 人工智能如何推动心理科学的发展。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70047
Galit Yovel

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed scientific inquiry across disciplines, including the psychological sciences. In psychology, AI serves not only as an analytic tool but also as a computational model of the very processes the field seeks to explain. In this commentary, I highlight several ways in which AI can advance fundamental questions in psychological science beyond traditional approaches, thanks to its unprecedented ability to generate high-level perceptual and cognitive human-like representations. These developments provide psychologists with powerful new tools that, if embraced, can significantly advance our understanding of the human mind and behaviour.

人工智能(AI)已经改变了包括心理科学在内的各个学科的科学探究。在心理学中,人工智能不仅可以作为分析工具,还可以作为该领域试图解释的过程的计算模型。在这篇评论中,我强调了人工智能可以超越传统方法推进心理科学基本问题的几种方式,这要归功于它前所未有的能力,可以产生高层次的感知和认知类人类表征。这些发展为心理学家提供了强大的新工具,如果我们接受这些工具,就可以大大提高我们对人类思想和行为的理解。
{"title":"How AI can advance psychological science.","authors":"Galit Yovel","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed scientific inquiry across disciplines, including the psychological sciences. In psychology, AI serves not only as an analytic tool but also as a computational model of the very processes the field seeks to explain. In this commentary, I highlight several ways in which AI can advance fundamental questions in psychological science beyond traditional approaches, thanks to its unprecedented ability to generate high-level perceptual and cognitive human-like representations. These developments provide psychologists with powerful new tools that, if embraced, can significantly advance our understanding of the human mind and behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Added value of AI for psychology or added value of psychology for AI? AI对心理学的附加价值还是心理学对AI的附加价值?
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70046
Marc Brysbaert

In this commentary, I express my concern that the special issue focuses too much on the added value of AI for psychology, while psychological research also has much to offer, such as the operationalization of variables based on theory, validation tools and the statistical evaluation of information generated by AI systems.

在这篇评论中,我表达了我的担忧,即特刊过于关注人工智能对心理学的附加值,而心理学研究也有很多东西可以提供,例如基于理论的变量操作化,验证工具和人工智能系统生成的信息的统计评估。
{"title":"Added value of AI for psychology or added value of psychology for AI?","authors":"Marc Brysbaert","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this commentary, I express my concern that the special issue focuses too much on the added value of AI for psychology, while psychological research also has much to offer, such as the operationalization of variables based on theory, validation tools and the statistical evaluation of information generated by AI systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A novel index to measure pre-planning in the Tower of London task: Test-retest reliability and known-group validity. 一种衡量伦敦塔任务预计划的新指标:重测信度和已知组效度。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-28 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70044
Lena V Schumacher, Benjamin Rahm, Christoph P Kaller, Valentin Schyle, Cornelius Weiller, Josef M Unterrainer

The Tower of London (TOL) is a planning task frequently used in clinical settings and research. Planning and execution times are the most common outcome variables despite yielding lower effect sizes in clinical group comparisons and lower test-retest reliability than planning accuracy. Here, it is proposed that planning time be analysed not in isolation, but in relation to the combined duration of planning and execution, yielding a novel pre-planning index (PPI). In N = 179 healthy participants, test-retest reliability analyses yielded higher absolute agreement and less intra-individual variability over two sessions for PPI than for planning and execution times. The clinical validity of PPI was probed by comparing patients known to exhibit planning deficits and healthy controls. Stroke and Parkinson's patients showed significantly lower PPI than controls, driven by reduced planning and longer execution times. There was no difference in PPI between patients with mild cognitive impairment and controls. Consistently across healthy participants and patients, the positive correlation of PPI with planning accuracy exceeded that of planning times with accuracy. Thus, this pre-planning index can enhance both the reliability and clinical validity of TOL latency variables and represents a useful complement to accuracy for measuring planning performance in health and disease.

伦敦塔(TOL)是一项经常用于临床环境和研究的规划任务。计划和执行时间是最常见的结果变量,尽管在临床组比较中产生较低的效应量,并且与计划准确性相比,测试重测可靠性较低。在此,建议不孤立地分析计划时间,而是与计划和执行的综合持续时间相关联,从而产生一种新的计划前指数(PPI)。在179名健康参与者中,测试-重测信度分析在PPI的两个疗程中获得了比计划和执行时间更高的绝对一致性和更少的个体内变异性。通过比较已知表现出计划缺陷的患者和健康对照者来探讨PPI的临床有效性。中风和帕金森患者的PPI明显低于对照组,这是由于计划减少和执行时间延长所致。轻度认知障碍患者与对照组之间PPI无差异。在健康参与者和患者中,PPI与计划准确性的正相关超过了计划时间与准确性的正相关。因此,该预计划指数可以提高TOL潜伏期变量的可靠性和临床有效性,并代表了衡量健康和疾病计划绩效准确性的有用补充。
{"title":"A novel index to measure pre-planning in the Tower of London task: Test-retest reliability and known-group validity.","authors":"Lena V Schumacher, Benjamin Rahm, Christoph P Kaller, Valentin Schyle, Cornelius Weiller, Josef M Unterrainer","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Tower of London (TOL) is a planning task frequently used in clinical settings and research. Planning and execution times are the most common outcome variables despite yielding lower effect sizes in clinical group comparisons and lower test-retest reliability than planning accuracy. Here, it is proposed that planning time be analysed not in isolation, but in relation to the combined duration of planning and execution, yielding a novel pre-planning index (PPI). In N = 179 healthy participants, test-retest reliability analyses yielded higher absolute agreement and less intra-individual variability over two sessions for PPI than for planning and execution times. The clinical validity of PPI was probed by comparing patients known to exhibit planning deficits and healthy controls. Stroke and Parkinson's patients showed significantly lower PPI than controls, driven by reduced planning and longer execution times. There was no difference in PPI between patients with mild cognitive impairment and controls. Consistently across healthy participants and patients, the positive correlation of PPI with planning accuracy exceeded that of planning times with accuracy. Thus, this pre-planning index can enhance both the reliability and clinical validity of TOL latency variables and represents a useful complement to accuracy for measuring planning performance in health and disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145629902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On how people describe paintings with mirrors. 关于人们如何用镜子描绘绘画。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70042
Marco Bertamini, Mariapia Lucia, Sophia Diaz, Alessandro Soranzo

Since antiquity humans have been fascinated by mirrors; yet, when asked to predict what is made visible in the reflection, or to interpret a scene with a mirror, observers make systematic errors. Many observers claim that a character in a scene is looking at themselves when their reflection is visible, despite not sharing the same viewpoint. The first part of the study consisted of a survey of artworks containing mirrors, and the creation of a catalogue. The second part, using 21 artworks and an online methodology (N = 97), confirmed that the Venus effect impacts most participants. The third part (N = 101) tested whether the effect relates to cognitive/emotional perspective-taking - taking the perspective of someone else - or visual perspective-taking - understanding what can be seen from a certain viewpoint. We related the magnitude of the Venus effect to scores on the AQ test (as a measure of cognitive/emotional perspective-taking) and the ROMP test (as a measure of visual perspective-taking). AQ scores did not predict the Venus effect, and ROMP scores did. We conclude that the Venus effect is likely to occur because people fail to understand what can be seen from a given viewpoint.

自古以来,人类就对镜子着迷;然而,当被要求预测在反射中可以看到什么,或者用镜子解释一个场景时,观察者会犯系统性错误。许多观察者声称,一个场景中的角色在看到自己的倒影时,会看着自己,尽管他们的视角不同。研究的第一部分包括对包含镜子的艺术品进行调查,并制作目录。第二部分,使用21件艺术品和在线方法(N = 97),证实了维纳斯效应影响了大多数参与者。第三部分(N = 101)测试了这种效应是否与认知/情感换位思考(从别人的角度出发)或视觉换位思考(从某个角度出发)有关。我们将维纳斯效应的大小与AQ测试(作为一种认知/情感视角的测量)和ROMP测试(作为一种视觉视角的测量)的分数联系起来。AQ分数不能预测金星效应,而ROMP分数可以。我们的结论是,金星效应很可能发生,因为人们无法理解从一个给定的角度所能看到的东西。
{"title":"On how people describe paintings with mirrors.","authors":"Marco Bertamini, Mariapia Lucia, Sophia Diaz, Alessandro Soranzo","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since antiquity humans have been fascinated by mirrors; yet, when asked to predict what is made visible in the reflection, or to interpret a scene with a mirror, observers make systematic errors. Many observers claim that a character in a scene is looking at themselves when their reflection is visible, despite not sharing the same viewpoint. The first part of the study consisted of a survey of artworks containing mirrors, and the creation of a catalogue. The second part, using 21 artworks and an online methodology (N = 97), confirmed that the Venus effect impacts most participants. The third part (N = 101) tested whether the effect relates to cognitive/emotional perspective-taking - taking the perspective of someone else - or visual perspective-taking - understanding what can be seen from a certain viewpoint. We related the magnitude of the Venus effect to scores on the AQ test (as a measure of cognitive/emotional perspective-taking) and the ROMP test (as a measure of visual perspective-taking). AQ scores did not predict the Venus effect, and ROMP scores did. We conclude that the Venus effect is likely to occur because people fail to understand what can be seen from a given viewpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relationship between parental control types and mental health types in Chinese adolescents. 中国青少年父母控制类型与心理健康类型的关系
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70043
Xu Wang, Ni Zhu, Xiao Yu, Mingchen Wei, Shuai Chen, Weijun Liu, Yanling Liu

This study investigated the relationship between parental control types and mental health categories among Chinese adolescents. About 2240 adolescents (1267 males; Mage = 14.09) were recruited and completed the Parental Control Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Life Satisfaction Scale at two time points. Results revealed that adolescents' parental control could be classified into seven types, while mental health could be classified into three types. The key finding demonstrates significant dynamic interactions between these variables: at T1, the "high behavioral control-low psychological control" parental control type (e.g., behavioural guidance type) significantly promoted adolescents' transition towards more optimal mental health categories; conversely, adolescents classified in the "complete mental health" category at T1 were more likely to have parents exhibiting the "high behavioural control-low psychological control" positive parenting pattern at T2. This "virtuous cycle" pattern was confirmed, although the "vicious cycle" commonly observed in variable-centred research between psychological control and poor mental health did not fully emerge in this study. These findings elucidate the complex bidirectional relationships between perceived parental control and mental health development among Chinese adolescents.

本研究旨在探讨中国青少年父母控制类型与心理健康类别的关系。共招募青少年2240名,其中男性1267名,年龄14.09岁,分别在两个时间点完成父母控制量表、患者健康问卷-9、生活满意度量表。结果表明,青少年父母控制可分为7种类型,心理健康可分为3种类型。关键发现表明这些变量之间存在显著的动态交互作用:在T1时,“高行为控制-低心理控制”父母控制类型(如行为指导类型)显著促进青少年向更优心理健康类别过渡;相反,在第一阶段被归类为“完全精神健康”类别的青少年,在第二阶段的父母更有可能表现出“高行为控制-低心理控制”的积极育儿模式。这种“良性循环”模式得到了证实,尽管在以变量为中心的研究中通常观察到的心理控制和不良心理健康之间的“恶性循环”并没有在本研究中完全出现。这些发现阐明了中国青少年感知父母控制与心理健康发展之间复杂的双向关系。
{"title":"The relationship between parental control types and mental health types in Chinese adolescents.","authors":"Xu Wang, Ni Zhu, Xiao Yu, Mingchen Wei, Shuai Chen, Weijun Liu, Yanling Liu","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relationship between parental control types and mental health categories among Chinese adolescents. About 2240 adolescents (1267 males; M<sub>age</sub> = 14.09) were recruited and completed the Parental Control Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Life Satisfaction Scale at two time points. Results revealed that adolescents' parental control could be classified into seven types, while mental health could be classified into three types. The key finding demonstrates significant dynamic interactions between these variables: at T1, the \"high behavioral control-low psychological control\" parental control type (e.g., behavioural guidance type) significantly promoted adolescents' transition towards more optimal mental health categories; conversely, adolescents classified in the \"complete mental health\" category at T1 were more likely to have parents exhibiting the \"high behavioural control-low psychological control\" positive parenting pattern at T2. This \"virtuous cycle\" pattern was confirmed, although the \"vicious cycle\" commonly observed in variable-centred research between psychological control and poor mental health did not fully emerge in this study. These findings elucidate the complex bidirectional relationships between perceived parental control and mental health development among Chinese adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial acknowledgement 社论承认
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70041
{"title":"Editorial acknowledgement","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"117 1","pages":"429-431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145941733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Demystifying the mist: Why do individuals hesitate to accept AI educational services? 揭秘迷雾:为什么个人不愿意接受人工智能教育服务?
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70040
Aiping Shao, Zhi Lu, Stephanie Q Liu, Yin Shi, Wei Lu

Rapid advances in AI technology are fuelling the proliferation of AI applications across industries, including educational services. With the allure of intelligent tutoring, individuals now face the choice of their educational approach-either parental engagement or utilizing AI educational services. This research employs an experimental design approach to examine individuals' decision-making processes involving AI educational services. Across five studies, we observe that, relative to AI educational services, parental engagement induces less guilt, receives a higher valuation and increases individuals' willingness to recommend it to others. We attribute these preferences to a perceived parental responsibility. Intrinsic attribution and conformity promote individuals' WOM. This research is the first to uncover the impact of educational approaches on individuals' guilt and downstream behaviours in the AI-in-Education field, shedding light on attribution as its underlying mechanism and offering actionable strategies to enhance individuals' WOM. The findings offer novel insights to AI-human interaction psychological research and hold practical implications for AI-in-Education industry practitioners.

人工智能技术的快速发展正在推动包括教育服务在内的各个行业的人工智能应用激增。随着智能辅导的诱惑,个人现在面临着他们的教育方法的选择——要么父母参与,要么利用人工智能教育服务。本研究采用实验设计方法来考察涉及人工智能教育服务的个人决策过程。在五项研究中,我们观察到,相对于人工智能教育服务,父母的参与引起的内疚感更少,得到了更高的评价,并增加了个人向他人推荐的意愿。我们将这些偏好归因于一种感知到的父母责任。内在归因和从众促进了个体的口碑。本研究首次揭示了教育方法对教育人工智能领域个人内疚感和下游行为的影响,揭示了归因作为其潜在机制,并提供了可操作的策略来增强个人的WOM。这些发现为人工智能-人类互动心理学研究提供了新的见解,并对人工智能教育行业从业者具有实际意义。
{"title":"Demystifying the mist: Why do individuals hesitate to accept AI educational services?","authors":"Aiping Shao, Zhi Lu, Stephanie Q Liu, Yin Shi, Wei Lu","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid advances in AI technology are fuelling the proliferation of AI applications across industries, including educational services. With the allure of intelligent tutoring, individuals now face the choice of their educational approach-either parental engagement or utilizing AI educational services. This research employs an experimental design approach to examine individuals' decision-making processes involving AI educational services. Across five studies, we observe that, relative to AI educational services, parental engagement induces less guilt, receives a higher valuation and increases individuals' willingness to recommend it to others. We attribute these preferences to a perceived parental responsibility. Intrinsic attribution and conformity promote individuals' WOM. This research is the first to uncover the impact of educational approaches on individuals' guilt and downstream behaviours in the AI-in-Education field, shedding light on attribution as its underlying mechanism and offering actionable strategies to enhance individuals' WOM. The findings offer novel insights to AI-human interaction psychological research and hold practical implications for AI-in-Education industry practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145488063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Temporal dynamics of cue integration for sense of agency in social comparative context. 社会比较情境下代理感线索整合的时间动态。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70039
Yunyun Chen, Xintong Zou, Hong He, Xuemin Zhang

Cue integration theory suggests that the sense of agency arises from the interaction of multiple cues, weighted by their reliability and availability. However, whether this integration is dynamic or static remains unclear. This study explored the potential dynamics of cue integration by examining the interplay between internal and external cues in social comparison contexts. Participants in the two experiments controlled a circle to a target location, with the circle's motion either fluent or disfluent. After completing the task, the participants received feedback on their performance relative to others, delivered in either a social (hand gestures in Experiment 1) or non-social format (arrow symbols in Experiment 2), presented either before or after they provided agency ratings. Results revealed that both socially and non-socially formatted feedback influenced agency ratings for future actions (forward modulation) as well as for past actions (backward modulation). Notably, a dynamic pattern of integration was evident only between socially formatted feedback and motion fluency: under disfluent motion, forward and backward effects of socially formatted feedback intensified over time. Conversely, with fluent motion, the impact of socially formatted feedback diminished over time. These findings underscore the complexity of cue integration, indicating a need to incorporate temporal dynamics into cue integration theory.

线索整合理论认为,代理感产生于多个线索的相互作用,由它们的可靠性和可用性加权。然而,这种集成是动态的还是静态的仍然不清楚。本研究通过考察社会比较情境下内部和外部线索的相互作用,探讨线索整合的潜在动力。在两个实验中,参与者控制一个圆圈到达目标位置,圆圈的运动有流畅的,也有不流畅的。在完成任务后,参与者收到了关于他们相对于其他人的表现的反馈,这些反馈以社交形式(实验1中的手势)或非社交形式(实验2中的箭头符号)提供,在他们提供代理评级之前或之后呈现。结果显示,社会和非社会格式的反馈对未来行为(正向调制)和过去行为(反向调制)的代理评级都有影响。值得注意的是,只有在社交格式反馈和动作流畅之间才有明显的动态整合模式:在不流畅的动作下,社交格式反馈的正向和反向效应随着时间的推移而增强。相反,对于流畅的动作,社交格式反馈的影响会随着时间的推移而减弱。这些发现强调了线索整合的复杂性,表明需要将时间动态纳入线索整合理论。
{"title":"Temporal dynamics of cue integration for sense of agency in social comparative context.","authors":"Yunyun Chen, Xintong Zou, Hong He, Xuemin Zhang","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cue integration theory suggests that the sense of agency arises from the interaction of multiple cues, weighted by their reliability and availability. However, whether this integration is dynamic or static remains unclear. This study explored the potential dynamics of cue integration by examining the interplay between internal and external cues in social comparison contexts. Participants in the two experiments controlled a circle to a target location, with the circle's motion either fluent or disfluent. After completing the task, the participants received feedback on their performance relative to others, delivered in either a social (hand gestures in Experiment 1) or non-social format (arrow symbols in Experiment 2), presented either before or after they provided agency ratings. Results revealed that both socially and non-socially formatted feedback influenced agency ratings for future actions (forward modulation) as well as for past actions (backward modulation). Notably, a dynamic pattern of integration was evident only between socially formatted feedback and motion fluency: under disfluent motion, forward and backward effects of socially formatted feedback intensified over time. Conversely, with fluent motion, the impact of socially formatted feedback diminished over time. These findings underscore the complexity of cue integration, indicating a need to incorporate temporal dynamics into cue integration theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Denialist vs. warmist climate change conspiracy beliefs: Ideological roots, psychological correlates and environmental implications. 否认论者与气候变暖论者的气候变化阴谋论:意识形态根源、心理关联和环境影响。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70035
Dylan de Gourville, Karen M Douglas, Robbie M Sutton

In the current research, we use network analysis to examine the structure, ideological foundations and correlates of climate change conspiracy theories, distinguishing between denialist and warmist beliefs. Denialist beliefs, typically endorsed on the political right, claim that climate change is exaggerated, whereas warmist beliefs, more prevalent on the left, allege the suppression of climate science and the downplaying of climate change. Across four studies, these beliefs showed a weak and unstable positive correlation but were reliably connected via indirect associations with general conspiracy beliefs and negatively through opposing relationships with denial of anthropogenic climate change (ACC) and conservatism. General conspiracy beliefs and denial of ACC were not directly connected but were instead related indirectly through climate-specific conspiracy beliefs: positively via denialist and negatively via warmist. We found no evidence across studies for an association between climate change conspiracy beliefs and indices of non-rational thinking. Finally, denialist beliefs were negatively associated with pro-environmental intentions, environmental concern, policy support and collective guilt, whereas warmist beliefs were positively related to these outcomes, except for environmental concern, where no significant relationship emerged. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing ideological variants of climate change conspiracy beliefs to contextualize their psychological significance and potential impacts.

在当前的研究中,我们使用网络分析来检验气候变化阴谋论的结构、思想基础和相关因素,区分否认论和变暖论的信仰。否认主义信仰通常得到政治右翼的支持,声称气候变化被夸大了,而温暖主义信仰则在左翼中更为普遍,声称压制气候科学和淡化气候变化。在四项研究中,这些信念表现出微弱且不稳定的正相关,但通过与一般阴谋信念的间接关联而可靠地联系在一起,并通过与否认人为气候变化(ACC)和保守主义的负相关关系而负相关。一般的阴谋信念与否认ACC没有直接联系,而是通过气候特定的阴谋信念间接相关:通过否认论者产生积极影响,通过变暖论者产生消极影响。在所有研究中,我们没有发现气候变化阴谋信念与非理性思维指数之间存在关联的证据。最后,否认主义信念与亲环境意图、环境关注、政策支持和集体内疚呈负相关,而温暖主义信念与这些结果呈正相关,但环境关注与这些结果无显著关系。这些发现强调了区分气候变化阴谋信念的意识形态变体以将其心理意义和潜在影响置于背景下的重要性。
{"title":"Denialist vs. warmist climate change conspiracy beliefs: Ideological roots, psychological correlates and environmental implications.","authors":"Dylan de Gourville, Karen M Douglas, Robbie M Sutton","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the current research, we use network analysis to examine the structure, ideological foundations and correlates of climate change conspiracy theories, distinguishing between denialist and warmist beliefs. Denialist beliefs, typically endorsed on the political right, claim that climate change is exaggerated, whereas warmist beliefs, more prevalent on the left, allege the suppression of climate science and the downplaying of climate change. Across four studies, these beliefs showed a weak and unstable positive correlation but were reliably connected via indirect associations with general conspiracy beliefs and negatively through opposing relationships with denial of anthropogenic climate change (ACC) and conservatism. General conspiracy beliefs and denial of ACC were not directly connected but were instead related indirectly through climate-specific conspiracy beliefs: positively via denialist and negatively via warmist. We found no evidence across studies for an association between climate change conspiracy beliefs and indices of non-rational thinking. Finally, denialist beliefs were negatively associated with pro-environmental intentions, environmental concern, policy support and collective guilt, whereas warmist beliefs were positively related to these outcomes, except for environmental concern, where no significant relationship emerged. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing ideological variants of climate change conspiracy beliefs to contextualize their psychological significance and potential impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Negative targets specifically enhance conscious and unconscious social attention. 负面目标具体地增强了有意识和无意识的社会关注。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70036
Tian Yuan, Li Wang, Antao Chen, Yi Jiang

Humans are highly adept at utilizing various social signals, such as eye gaze and biological motion (BM), to detect important events (e.g. threat, reward) in the environment, a phenomenon termed social attention. Here we investigated whether the affective information carried by the contextual event would modulate this social attention behaviour. By introducing natural emotional pictures (negative, neutral and positive) as peripheral probing targets within the modified central cueing paradigm, we found that central BM induced a stronger attentional orienting effect towards negative targets than neutral and positive ones. Moreover, this modulation was observed in attentional effects induced by another well-known social cue (i.e. eye gaze), whereas no such effect was obtained with the non-social arrow cues. Importantly, this negativity bias persisted at the subliminal level, as shown by the significant attentional effects towards negative targets induced by unconscious social cues (i.e. BM, eye gaze). In contrast, no attentional effects were obtained with non-conscious arrow cues. Overall, these findings reveal a general enhancement of negative targets on conscious and unconscious social attention induced by different types of social signals (i.e. BM, eye gaze) and highlight the distinction of social attention compared to non-social attention in detecting potentially detrimental events.

人类非常擅长利用各种社会信号,如眼睛注视和生物运动(BM),来检测环境中的重要事件(如威胁、奖励),这种现象被称为社会注意。在这里,我们研究了上下文事件所携带的情感信息是否会调节这种社会注意行为。通过引入自然情绪图片(消极、中性和积极)作为外周探查目标,我们发现中枢脑基对消极目标的注意定向效应强于中性和积极目标。此外,这种调制在另一种众所周知的社会线索(即眼睛注视)引起的注意效应中被观察到,而非社会箭头线索则没有这种效应。重要的是,这种消极偏见在潜意识层面上持续存在,正如无意识社会线索(如BM,眼睛注视)对消极目标的显著注意效应所显示的那样。相比之下,无意识的箭头提示没有引起注意效应。总的来说,这些发现揭示了负面目标在不同类型的社会信号(如BM,眼睛注视)诱导下对有意识和无意识社会注意的普遍增强,并突出了社会注意与非社会注意在检测潜在有害事件方面的区别。
{"title":"Negative targets specifically enhance conscious and unconscious social attention.","authors":"Tian Yuan, Li Wang, Antao Chen, Yi Jiang","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans are highly adept at utilizing various social signals, such as eye gaze and biological motion (BM), to detect important events (e.g. threat, reward) in the environment, a phenomenon termed social attention. Here we investigated whether the affective information carried by the contextual event would modulate this social attention behaviour. By introducing natural emotional pictures (negative, neutral and positive) as peripheral probing targets within the modified central cueing paradigm, we found that central BM induced a stronger attentional orienting effect towards negative targets than neutral and positive ones. Moreover, this modulation was observed in attentional effects induced by another well-known social cue (i.e. eye gaze), whereas no such effect was obtained with the non-social arrow cues. Importantly, this negativity bias persisted at the subliminal level, as shown by the significant attentional effects towards negative targets induced by unconscious social cues (i.e. BM, eye gaze). In contrast, no attentional effects were obtained with non-conscious arrow cues. Overall, these findings reveal a general enhancement of negative targets on conscious and unconscious social attention induced by different types of social signals (i.e. BM, eye gaze) and highlight the distinction of social attention compared to non-social attention in detecting potentially detrimental events.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145273871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
British journal of psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1