首页 > 最新文献

British journal of psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Perinatal women dominantly protect-rather than submissively cede-resources when interacting with threatening-looking others. 围产期妇女在与看起来具有威胁性的人互动时,主要是保护资源,而不是顺从地放弃资源。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70051
Valentina Proietti, Ilenia Mastroianni, Valentina Silvestri, Martina Arioli, Viola Macchi Cassia, Shawn N Geniole

When competing for resources, people appear particularly sensitive to social cues of threat, tending to submissively cede resources to more (vs. less) threatening-looking others. This tendency appears especially pronounced among those that are physically weaker and thus more vulnerable to harm. One phase of adult life during which humans are particularly vulnerable is the perinatal period, the months leading up to and immediately after parturition (giving birth). Previous evidence and models of parental care and motivation suggest that individuals would be especially sensitive to threats during this phase. Accordingly, here we tested for the first time the preregistered prediction that perinatal (vs. non-perinatal) women would submissively cede more to threatening-looking others when competing over resources. Contrary to these predictions, results showed that women in this phase (n = 86, tested at ~29 weeks gestation and 1-month postpartum) were less sensitive to social threat than were non-perinatal women (n = 53), dominantly protecting rather than submissively ceding resources against threatening-looking male strangers. These findings suggest that pregnancy may affect social and economic decision-making by reducing (rather than increasing) submissiveness to threat, consistent with a 'maternal aggression' response documented in many non-human mammals.

在争夺资源时,人们似乎对威胁的社会线索特别敏感,倾向于顺从地将资源让给更具(相对于更少)威胁性的人。这种趋势在那些身体较弱因而更容易受到伤害的人身上表现得尤为明显。人类在成年生活中特别脆弱的一个阶段是围产期,即分娩前后的几个月。先前的证据和模型表明,在这一阶段,个体对威胁特别敏感。因此,我们首次测试了预先登记的预测,即围产期(与非围产期相比)妇女在争夺资源时更容易顺从地向具有威胁性的其他人让步。与这些预测相反,结果显示,在这一阶段的女性(n = 86,在妊娠~29周和产后1个月进行测试)对社会威胁的敏感程度低于非围产期女性(n = 53),她们主要保护而不是顺从地放弃资源,以对抗具有威胁性的男性陌生人。这些发现表明,怀孕可能会减少(而不是增加)对威胁的顺从,从而影响社会和经济决策,这与许多非人类哺乳动物的“母性攻击”反应一致。
{"title":"Perinatal women dominantly protect-rather than submissively cede-resources when interacting with threatening-looking others.","authors":"Valentina Proietti, Ilenia Mastroianni, Valentina Silvestri, Martina Arioli, Viola Macchi Cassia, Shawn N Geniole","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70051","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjop.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When competing for resources, people appear particularly sensitive to social cues of threat, tending to submissively cede resources to more (vs. less) threatening-looking others. This tendency appears especially pronounced among those that are physically weaker and thus more vulnerable to harm. One phase of adult life during which humans are particularly vulnerable is the perinatal period, the months leading up to and immediately after parturition (giving birth). Previous evidence and models of parental care and motivation suggest that individuals would be especially sensitive to threats during this phase. Accordingly, here we tested for the first time the preregistered prediction that perinatal (vs. non-perinatal) women would submissively cede more to threatening-looking others when competing over resources. Contrary to these predictions, results showed that women in this phase (n = 86, tested at ~29 weeks gestation and 1-month postpartum) were less sensitive to social threat than were non-perinatal women (n = 53), dominantly protecting rather than submissively ceding resources against threatening-looking male strangers. These findings suggest that pregnancy may affect social and economic decision-making by reducing (rather than increasing) submissiveness to threat, consistent with a 'maternal aggression' response documented in many non-human mammals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of emotional variability on social evaluations of faces: An advantage of low variability. 情绪变异性对面孔社会评价的影响:低变异性的优势。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70052
Jiadong Peng, Yao Huang, Luyan Ji

When people see another person's face, they can quickly infer traits and make social evaluations from them, a process known as social perception of faces. Previous studies have investigated the effects of emotion on social evaluations but have mainly focused on single expressions. The present study examined how intra-individual emotional variability across multiple faces affects judgements of warmth and competence. In Experiment 1, mixed-valence sets containing both happy and angry faces were used, and emotional variability was manipulated by varying the emotional distance of faces. Results showed that the positive warmth and competence words were perceived as more appropriate to describe faces with low variability compared with high variability (Exp1a). This low-variability advantage persisted after controlling for extreme expressions and generalized to additional warm and competent traits (Exp1b). Experiments 2a and 2b tested the variability effects across happy-only, angry-only, and mixed-valence sets. Positive sets received the highest ratings, mixed-valence sets intermediate, and negative sets the lowest on both dimensions. Importantly, a significant main effect of variability emerged only for competence ratings, with low-variability faces rated higher than high-variability faces. In summary, our study indicates that low emotional variability has an advantage in social evaluations over high emotional variability.

当人们看到另一个人的脸时,他们可以迅速推断出特征,并从中做出社会评价,这一过程被称为面孔的社会感知。以前的研究已经调查了情绪对社会评价的影响,但主要集中在单一的表达。本研究考察了不同面孔的个体内部情绪变化如何影响对热情和能力的判断。实验1采用包含快乐和愤怒面孔的混合效价集,通过改变面孔的情感距离来操纵情绪变异性。结果表明,与高变异性相比,积极的温暖和能力词更适合描述低变异性的面孔(Exp1a)。在控制了极端表达后,这种低变异性优势仍然存在,并推广到其他温暖和胜任性状(Exp1b)。实验2a和2b测试了只开心、只生气和混合价组的变异性效应。在两个维度上,阳性组的评分最高,混合价组的评分居中,阴性组的评分最低。重要的是,变异性的显著主要影响只出现在能力评分上,低变异性的面孔评分高于高变异性的面孔。综上所述,我们的研究表明,低情绪变异性比高情绪变异性在社会评价中具有优势。
{"title":"Effects of emotional variability on social evaluations of faces: An advantage of low variability.","authors":"Jiadong Peng, Yao Huang, Luyan Ji","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When people see another person's face, they can quickly infer traits and make social evaluations from them, a process known as social perception of faces. Previous studies have investigated the effects of emotion on social evaluations but have mainly focused on single expressions. The present study examined how intra-individual emotional variability across multiple faces affects judgements of warmth and competence. In Experiment 1, mixed-valence sets containing both happy and angry faces were used, and emotional variability was manipulated by varying the emotional distance of faces. Results showed that the positive warmth and competence words were perceived as more appropriate to describe faces with low variability compared with high variability (Exp1a). This low-variability advantage persisted after controlling for extreme expressions and generalized to additional warm and competent traits (Exp1b). Experiments 2a and 2b tested the variability effects across happy-only, angry-only, and mixed-valence sets. Positive sets received the highest ratings, mixed-valence sets intermediate, and negative sets the lowest on both dimensions. Importantly, a significant main effect of variability emerged only for competence ratings, with low-variability faces rated higher than high-variability faces. In summary, our study indicates that low emotional variability has an advantage in social evaluations over high emotional variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testing the impact of fallacies and contrarian claims in climate change misinformation. 测试气候变化错误信息中的谬论和相反主张的影响。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70049
Renee Lieu, Oliver R Hayes, John Cook

Climate misinformation reduces public acceptance of climate change and undermines support for mitigation policies. This study explored the impact of different types of climate misinformation, examining through content-based and logic-based frameworks. The content-based framework was based on a taxonomy of contrarian claims consisting of five categories-it's not real, it's not us, it's not bad, climate solutions won't work and scientists are not reliable. The logic-based framework examined six rhetorical techniques used in science denial arguments-misrepresentation, false equivalence, oversimplification, red herring, cherry picking and slothful induction. We experimentally tested 30 misinformation examples, crossing five content categories with six fallacies. Participants rated the perceived veracity of misinformation as well as the likelihood of interacting with it. We found no main effect of fallacy on perceived veracity or likelihood to interact but did find a main effect of content category, with the fourth category (climate solutions won't work) perceived as most veracious. We also found that content categories interacted with political ideology, replicating past research into the polarizing effect of climate misinformation. Specifically, the most polarizing categories of misinformation were those targeting climate solutions or attacking climate scientists. Our results highlight the need to prioritize combatting misinformation that targets solutions and scientists.

气候错误信息降低了公众对气候变化的接受程度,破坏了对缓解政策的支持。本研究通过基于内容和基于逻辑的框架探讨了不同类型的气候错误信息的影响。这个以内容为基础的框架是基于一个由五类组成的反主流主张的分类——它不是真实的,它不是我们的,它还不错,气候解决方案不会奏效,科学家不可靠。这个基于逻辑的框架研究了科学否认论证中使用的六种修辞技巧——虚假陈述、虚假等同、过度简化、转移注意力、挑三拣四和懒惰归纳。我们通过实验测试了30个错误信息的例子,跨越了5个内容类别和6个谬论。参与者评估了错误信息的真实性以及与之互动的可能性。我们没有发现谬误对感知真实性或交互可能性的主要影响,但确实发现了内容类别的主要影响,第四类(气候解决方案不起作用)被认为是最真实的。我们还发现,内容类别与政治意识形态相互作用,复制了过去对气候错误信息两极分化效应的研究。具体来说,最两极分化的错误信息是那些针对气候解决方案或攻击气候科学家的错误信息。我们的研究结果强调,需要优先打击针对解决方案和科学家的错误信息。
{"title":"Testing the impact of fallacies and contrarian claims in climate change misinformation.","authors":"Renee Lieu, Oliver R Hayes, John Cook","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Climate misinformation reduces public acceptance of climate change and undermines support for mitigation policies. This study explored the impact of different types of climate misinformation, examining through content-based and logic-based frameworks. The content-based framework was based on a taxonomy of contrarian claims consisting of five categories-it's not real, it's not us, it's not bad, climate solutions won't work and scientists are not reliable. The logic-based framework examined six rhetorical techniques used in science denial arguments-misrepresentation, false equivalence, oversimplification, red herring, cherry picking and slothful induction. We experimentally tested 30 misinformation examples, crossing five content categories with six fallacies. Participants rated the perceived veracity of misinformation as well as the likelihood of interacting with it. We found no main effect of fallacy on perceived veracity or likelihood to interact but did find a main effect of content category, with the fourth category (climate solutions won't work) perceived as most veracious. We also found that content categories interacted with political ideology, replicating past research into the polarizing effect of climate misinformation. Specifically, the most polarizing categories of misinformation were those targeting climate solutions or attacking climate scientists. Our results highlight the need to prioritize combatting misinformation that targets solutions and scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145854549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Economic inequality fosters unethical behaviour by promoting the perception of immoral and competitive normative climates. 经济不平等通过促进人们对不道德和竞争性规范气候的看法,从而助长不道德行为。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70048
Peng Sun, Hui Li, Jingxin Zhao, Yu Kou

Economic inequality was found to be positively related to unethical behaviours, but the underlying psychological mechanisms have not been well studied. Through five studies, this research explored the psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions between economic inequality and unethical behaviour. Study 1 (N = 165,622) provided primary evidence for the relationship between inequality and unethical behaviour based on large-scale publicly available databases. Using well-established questionnaires, Study 2 (N = 394) indicated that economic inequality positively predicted immoral and competitive normative climates, which positively predicted unethical behaviour. Study 3 (N = 160) and Study 4 (N = 188) provided causal evidence for the effect of economic inequality and repeatedly verified the mediating roles of immoral and competitive normative climates. Study 5 (N = 300) indicated that income level moderated the effect of economic inequality on unethical behaviour by moderating the mediating effect of immoral and competitive normative climates. In societies with high inequality, participants in low-income groups perceived stronger immoral and competitive normative climates, thereby engaging in more unethical behaviours. This research offers explanations for the prevalence of unethical behaviours in unequal societies, contributing to extend the emerging literature in social-ecological psychology that explores how macro-social-ecological factors impact micro-behaviours.

研究发现,经济不平等与不道德行为呈正相关,但其潜在的心理机制尚未得到很好的研究。本研究通过五项研究,探讨了经济不平等与不道德行为之间的心理机制和边界条件。研究1 (N = 165,622)提供了基于大规模公开数据库的不平等与不道德行为之间关系的主要证据。通过完善的问卷调查,研究2 (N = 394)表明,经济不平等积极预测不道德和竞争规范气候,后者积极预测不道德行为。研究3 (N = 160)和研究4 (N = 188)为经济不平等的影响提供了因果证据,并反复验证了不道德和竞争性规范气候的中介作用。研究5 (N = 300)表明,收入水平通过调节不道德和竞争性规范气候的中介作用来调节经济不平等对不道德行为的影响。在高度不平等的社会中,低收入群体的参与者感受到更强烈的不道德和竞争性规范气候,从而从事更多不道德的行为。本研究为不平等社会中普遍存在的不道德行为提供了解释,有助于扩展社会生态心理学的新兴文献,探讨宏观社会生态因素如何影响微观行为。
{"title":"Economic inequality fosters unethical behaviour by promoting the perception of immoral and competitive normative climates.","authors":"Peng Sun, Hui Li, Jingxin Zhao, Yu Kou","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Economic inequality was found to be positively related to unethical behaviours, but the underlying psychological mechanisms have not been well studied. Through five studies, this research explored the psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions between economic inequality and unethical behaviour. Study 1 (N = 165,622) provided primary evidence for the relationship between inequality and unethical behaviour based on large-scale publicly available databases. Using well-established questionnaires, Study 2 (N = 394) indicated that economic inequality positively predicted immoral and competitive normative climates, which positively predicted unethical behaviour. Study 3 (N = 160) and Study 4 (N = 188) provided causal evidence for the effect of economic inequality and repeatedly verified the mediating roles of immoral and competitive normative climates. Study 5 (N = 300) indicated that income level moderated the effect of economic inequality on unethical behaviour by moderating the mediating effect of immoral and competitive normative climates. In societies with high inequality, participants in low-income groups perceived stronger immoral and competitive normative climates, thereby engaging in more unethical behaviours. This research offers explanations for the prevalence of unethical behaviours in unequal societies, contributing to extend the emerging literature in social-ecological psychology that explores how macro-social-ecological factors impact micro-behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study. 重复信任游戏中的信任学习:元分析研究。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70045
Caitlin Duncan, Lorena Sganzerla, Laura Kaltwasser, Isabel Dziobek

Trust involves making oneself vulnerable by relying on the expectation that others will reciprocate and act in a trustworthy manner, leading to mutual benefit. In behavioural economics and psychology, the Trust Game (TG) is a widely used paradigm to measure trust. The repeated TG is a modified version of the TG in which participants encounter the same partner(s) multiple times, allowing for reputation and trust learning. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to identify features of the repeated TG, participant characteristics, and manipulations of partner trustworthiness that affect trust learning. This is the first meta-analytic study to specifically assess trust learning in the repeated TG and included 404 effect sizes from over 8000 participants from 68 studies. Our findings indicate that the partners' behavioural trustworthiness, in the form of their reciprocation rate, is by far the most influential factor in participant trust learning (β = 3.0). Furthermore, the results reveal that manipulating prior information about partners can have an effect on the amount of learning, but only for manipulations of trustworthiness/morality. Notably, in ingroup-outgroup studies, participants learn from their partners' trustworthiness and it is not affected by their partners' group membership.

信任包括通过期望他人会以值得信赖的方式回报并采取行动,从而使自己变得脆弱,从而实现互惠互利。在行为经济学和心理学中,信任博弈(TG)是一种被广泛使用的衡量信任的范式。重复TG是TG的修改版本,参与者多次遇到相同的伙伴,允许声誉和信任学习。本荟萃分析的目的是确定重复TG的特征,参与者的特征,以及对伙伴可信度的操纵影响信任学习。这是第一个专门评估重复TG中信任学习的荟萃分析研究,包括来自68项研究的8000多名参与者的404个效应值。我们的研究结果表明,合作伙伴的行为可信度,以他们的回报率的形式,是迄今为止对参与者信任学习影响最大的因素(β = 3.0)。此外,研究结果还表明,操纵合作伙伴的先验信息对学习量有影响,但仅对可信度/道德的操纵有影响。值得注意的是,在群内群外研究中,参与者从伴侣的可信度中学习,而不受其伴侣的群体成员身份的影响。
{"title":"Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study.","authors":"Caitlin Duncan, Lorena Sganzerla, Laura Kaltwasser, Isabel Dziobek","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trust involves making oneself vulnerable by relying on the expectation that others will reciprocate and act in a trustworthy manner, leading to mutual benefit. In behavioural economics and psychology, the Trust Game (TG) is a widely used paradigm to measure trust. The repeated TG is a modified version of the TG in which participants encounter the same partner(s) multiple times, allowing for reputation and trust learning. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to identify features of the repeated TG, participant characteristics, and manipulations of partner trustworthiness that affect trust learning. This is the first meta-analytic study to specifically assess trust learning in the repeated TG and included 404 effect sizes from over 8000 participants from 68 studies. Our findings indicate that the partners' behavioural trustworthiness, in the form of their reciprocation rate, is by far the most influential factor in participant trust learning (β = 3.0). Furthermore, the results reveal that manipulating prior information about partners can have an effect on the amount of learning, but only for manipulations of trustworthiness/morality. Notably, in ingroup-outgroup studies, participants learn from their partners' trustworthiness and it is not affected by their partners' group membership.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How AI can advance psychological science. 人工智能如何推动心理科学的发展。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70047
Galit Yovel

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed scientific inquiry across disciplines, including the psychological sciences. In psychology, AI serves not only as an analytic tool but also as a computational model of the very processes the field seeks to explain. In this commentary, I highlight several ways in which AI can advance fundamental questions in psychological science beyond traditional approaches, thanks to its unprecedented ability to generate high-level perceptual and cognitive human-like representations. These developments provide psychologists with powerful new tools that, if embraced, can significantly advance our understanding of the human mind and behaviour.

人工智能(AI)已经改变了包括心理科学在内的各个学科的科学探究。在心理学中,人工智能不仅可以作为分析工具,还可以作为该领域试图解释的过程的计算模型。在这篇评论中,我强调了人工智能可以超越传统方法推进心理科学基本问题的几种方式,这要归功于它前所未有的能力,可以产生高层次的感知和认知类人类表征。这些发展为心理学家提供了强大的新工具,如果我们接受这些工具,就可以大大提高我们对人类思想和行为的理解。
{"title":"How AI can advance psychological science.","authors":"Galit Yovel","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed scientific inquiry across disciplines, including the psychological sciences. In psychology, AI serves not only as an analytic tool but also as a computational model of the very processes the field seeks to explain. In this commentary, I highlight several ways in which AI can advance fundamental questions in psychological science beyond traditional approaches, thanks to its unprecedented ability to generate high-level perceptual and cognitive human-like representations. These developments provide psychologists with powerful new tools that, if embraced, can significantly advance our understanding of the human mind and behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Added value of AI for psychology or added value of psychology for AI? AI对心理学的附加价值还是心理学对AI的附加价值?
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70046
Marc Brysbaert

In this commentary, I express my concern that the special issue focuses too much on the added value of AI for psychology, while psychological research also has much to offer, such as the operationalization of variables based on theory, validation tools and the statistical evaluation of information generated by AI systems.

在这篇评论中,我表达了我的担忧,即特刊过于关注人工智能对心理学的附加值,而心理学研究也有很多东西可以提供,例如基于理论的变量操作化,验证工具和人工智能系统生成的信息的统计评估。
{"title":"Added value of AI for psychology or added value of psychology for AI?","authors":"Marc Brysbaert","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this commentary, I express my concern that the special issue focuses too much on the added value of AI for psychology, while psychological research also has much to offer, such as the operationalization of variables based on theory, validation tools and the statistical evaluation of information generated by AI systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A novel index to measure pre-planning in the Tower of London task: Test-retest reliability and known-group validity. 一种衡量伦敦塔任务预计划的新指标:重测信度和已知组效度。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-28 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70044
Lena V Schumacher, Benjamin Rahm, Christoph P Kaller, Valentin Schyle, Cornelius Weiller, Josef M Unterrainer

The Tower of London (TOL) is a planning task frequently used in clinical settings and research. Planning and execution times are the most common outcome variables despite yielding lower effect sizes in clinical group comparisons and lower test-retest reliability than planning accuracy. Here, it is proposed that planning time be analysed not in isolation, but in relation to the combined duration of planning and execution, yielding a novel pre-planning index (PPI). In N = 179 healthy participants, test-retest reliability analyses yielded higher absolute agreement and less intra-individual variability over two sessions for PPI than for planning and execution times. The clinical validity of PPI was probed by comparing patients known to exhibit planning deficits and healthy controls. Stroke and Parkinson's patients showed significantly lower PPI than controls, driven by reduced planning and longer execution times. There was no difference in PPI between patients with mild cognitive impairment and controls. Consistently across healthy participants and patients, the positive correlation of PPI with planning accuracy exceeded that of planning times with accuracy. Thus, this pre-planning index can enhance both the reliability and clinical validity of TOL latency variables and represents a useful complement to accuracy for measuring planning performance in health and disease.

伦敦塔(TOL)是一项经常用于临床环境和研究的规划任务。计划和执行时间是最常见的结果变量,尽管在临床组比较中产生较低的效应量,并且与计划准确性相比,测试重测可靠性较低。在此,建议不孤立地分析计划时间,而是与计划和执行的综合持续时间相关联,从而产生一种新的计划前指数(PPI)。在179名健康参与者中,测试-重测信度分析在PPI的两个疗程中获得了比计划和执行时间更高的绝对一致性和更少的个体内变异性。通过比较已知表现出计划缺陷的患者和健康对照者来探讨PPI的临床有效性。中风和帕金森患者的PPI明显低于对照组,这是由于计划减少和执行时间延长所致。轻度认知障碍患者与对照组之间PPI无差异。在健康参与者和患者中,PPI与计划准确性的正相关超过了计划时间与准确性的正相关。因此,该预计划指数可以提高TOL潜伏期变量的可靠性和临床有效性,并代表了衡量健康和疾病计划绩效准确性的有用补充。
{"title":"A novel index to measure pre-planning in the Tower of London task: Test-retest reliability and known-group validity.","authors":"Lena V Schumacher, Benjamin Rahm, Christoph P Kaller, Valentin Schyle, Cornelius Weiller, Josef M Unterrainer","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Tower of London (TOL) is a planning task frequently used in clinical settings and research. Planning and execution times are the most common outcome variables despite yielding lower effect sizes in clinical group comparisons and lower test-retest reliability than planning accuracy. Here, it is proposed that planning time be analysed not in isolation, but in relation to the combined duration of planning and execution, yielding a novel pre-planning index (PPI). In N = 179 healthy participants, test-retest reliability analyses yielded higher absolute agreement and less intra-individual variability over two sessions for PPI than for planning and execution times. The clinical validity of PPI was probed by comparing patients known to exhibit planning deficits and healthy controls. Stroke and Parkinson's patients showed significantly lower PPI than controls, driven by reduced planning and longer execution times. There was no difference in PPI between patients with mild cognitive impairment and controls. Consistently across healthy participants and patients, the positive correlation of PPI with planning accuracy exceeded that of planning times with accuracy. Thus, this pre-planning index can enhance both the reliability and clinical validity of TOL latency variables and represents a useful complement to accuracy for measuring planning performance in health and disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145629902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On how people describe paintings with mirrors. 关于人们如何用镜子描绘绘画。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70042
Marco Bertamini, Mariapia Lucia, Sophia Diaz, Alessandro Soranzo

Since antiquity humans have been fascinated by mirrors; yet, when asked to predict what is made visible in the reflection, or to interpret a scene with a mirror, observers make systematic errors. Many observers claim that a character in a scene is looking at themselves when their reflection is visible, despite not sharing the same viewpoint. The first part of the study consisted of a survey of artworks containing mirrors, and the creation of a catalogue. The second part, using 21 artworks and an online methodology (N = 97), confirmed that the Venus effect impacts most participants. The third part (N = 101) tested whether the effect relates to cognitive/emotional perspective-taking - taking the perspective of someone else - or visual perspective-taking - understanding what can be seen from a certain viewpoint. We related the magnitude of the Venus effect to scores on the AQ test (as a measure of cognitive/emotional perspective-taking) and the ROMP test (as a measure of visual perspective-taking). AQ scores did not predict the Venus effect, and ROMP scores did. We conclude that the Venus effect is likely to occur because people fail to understand what can be seen from a given viewpoint.

自古以来,人类就对镜子着迷;然而,当被要求预测在反射中可以看到什么,或者用镜子解释一个场景时,观察者会犯系统性错误。许多观察者声称,一个场景中的角色在看到自己的倒影时,会看着自己,尽管他们的视角不同。研究的第一部分包括对包含镜子的艺术品进行调查,并制作目录。第二部分,使用21件艺术品和在线方法(N = 97),证实了维纳斯效应影响了大多数参与者。第三部分(N = 101)测试了这种效应是否与认知/情感换位思考(从别人的角度出发)或视觉换位思考(从某个角度出发)有关。我们将维纳斯效应的大小与AQ测试(作为一种认知/情感视角的测量)和ROMP测试(作为一种视觉视角的测量)的分数联系起来。AQ分数不能预测金星效应,而ROMP分数可以。我们的结论是,金星效应很可能发生,因为人们无法理解从一个给定的角度所能看到的东西。
{"title":"On how people describe paintings with mirrors.","authors":"Marco Bertamini, Mariapia Lucia, Sophia Diaz, Alessandro Soranzo","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since antiquity humans have been fascinated by mirrors; yet, when asked to predict what is made visible in the reflection, or to interpret a scene with a mirror, observers make systematic errors. Many observers claim that a character in a scene is looking at themselves when their reflection is visible, despite not sharing the same viewpoint. The first part of the study consisted of a survey of artworks containing mirrors, and the creation of a catalogue. The second part, using 21 artworks and an online methodology (N = 97), confirmed that the Venus effect impacts most participants. The third part (N = 101) tested whether the effect relates to cognitive/emotional perspective-taking - taking the perspective of someone else - or visual perspective-taking - understanding what can be seen from a certain viewpoint. We related the magnitude of the Venus effect to scores on the AQ test (as a measure of cognitive/emotional perspective-taking) and the ROMP test (as a measure of visual perspective-taking). AQ scores did not predict the Venus effect, and ROMP scores did. We conclude that the Venus effect is likely to occur because people fail to understand what can be seen from a given viewpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relationship between parental control types and mental health types in Chinese adolescents. 中国青少年父母控制类型与心理健康类型的关系
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70043
Xu Wang, Ni Zhu, Xiao Yu, Mingchen Wei, Shuai Chen, Weijun Liu, Yanling Liu

This study investigated the relationship between parental control types and mental health categories among Chinese adolescents. About 2240 adolescents (1267 males; Mage = 14.09) were recruited and completed the Parental Control Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Life Satisfaction Scale at two time points. Results revealed that adolescents' parental control could be classified into seven types, while mental health could be classified into three types. The key finding demonstrates significant dynamic interactions between these variables: at T1, the "high behavioral control-low psychological control" parental control type (e.g., behavioural guidance type) significantly promoted adolescents' transition towards more optimal mental health categories; conversely, adolescents classified in the "complete mental health" category at T1 were more likely to have parents exhibiting the "high behavioural control-low psychological control" positive parenting pattern at T2. This "virtuous cycle" pattern was confirmed, although the "vicious cycle" commonly observed in variable-centred research between psychological control and poor mental health did not fully emerge in this study. These findings elucidate the complex bidirectional relationships between perceived parental control and mental health development among Chinese adolescents.

本研究旨在探讨中国青少年父母控制类型与心理健康类别的关系。共招募青少年2240名,其中男性1267名,年龄14.09岁,分别在两个时间点完成父母控制量表、患者健康问卷-9、生活满意度量表。结果表明,青少年父母控制可分为7种类型,心理健康可分为3种类型。关键发现表明这些变量之间存在显著的动态交互作用:在T1时,“高行为控制-低心理控制”父母控制类型(如行为指导类型)显著促进青少年向更优心理健康类别过渡;相反,在第一阶段被归类为“完全精神健康”类别的青少年,在第二阶段的父母更有可能表现出“高行为控制-低心理控制”的积极育儿模式。这种“良性循环”模式得到了证实,尽管在以变量为中心的研究中通常观察到的心理控制和不良心理健康之间的“恶性循环”并没有在本研究中完全出现。这些发现阐明了中国青少年感知父母控制与心理健康发展之间复杂的双向关系。
{"title":"The relationship between parental control types and mental health types in Chinese adolescents.","authors":"Xu Wang, Ni Zhu, Xiao Yu, Mingchen Wei, Shuai Chen, Weijun Liu, Yanling Liu","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relationship between parental control types and mental health categories among Chinese adolescents. About 2240 adolescents (1267 males; M<sub>age</sub> = 14.09) were recruited and completed the Parental Control Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Life Satisfaction Scale at two time points. Results revealed that adolescents' parental control could be classified into seven types, while mental health could be classified into three types. The key finding demonstrates significant dynamic interactions between these variables: at T1, the \"high behavioral control-low psychological control\" parental control type (e.g., behavioural guidance type) significantly promoted adolescents' transition towards more optimal mental health categories; conversely, adolescents classified in the \"complete mental health\" category at T1 were more likely to have parents exhibiting the \"high behavioural control-low psychological control\" positive parenting pattern at T2. This \"virtuous cycle\" pattern was confirmed, although the \"vicious cycle\" commonly observed in variable-centred research between psychological control and poor mental health did not fully emerge in this study. These findings elucidate the complex bidirectional relationships between perceived parental control and mental health development among Chinese adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
British journal of psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1