A 66-year-old woman presents with unilateral orbital inflammation of several years of evolution, initially classified as idiopathic orbital inflammatory disease (IOID) subtype myositis. She presented with pain, eyelid inflammation and significant elevation of intraocular pressure, as well as radiological signs of exophthalmos and superior rectus myositis. She was treated with corticosteroids, with partial response. She was diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma, complicated with febrile neutropenia, and therefore immunosuppressive treatment was contraindicated. Treatment with intraorbital rituximab was decided, achieving resolution of symptoms and reduction of IOP. The diagnosis of neoplasia raises the possibility of paraneoplastic orbital inflammation.
Although silicone oil is used as an intraocular buffer in vitreoretinal surgical procedures, its use can cause complications, including glaucoma. This study highlights the importance of individualized approaches for the management of silicone oil-induced glaucoma. A 62-year-old man with a past medical history of retinal detachment and multiple ocular surgical procedurespresented with uncontrolled ocular pressure peaks after retinal detachment surgery using silicone oil as a buffer, which did not resolve after removal of the buffer. We decided to perform anterior chamber lavage followed by the implantation of a subconjunctival drainage device in the lower nasal location to minimize complications and maintain good visual acuity. Silicone oil extraction is usually the treatment of choice, although it can cause fluctuations in intraocular pressure. In this case, a more physiological and less invasive approach was chosen with the implantation of a Presserflo® device in the lower nasal region, avoiding complications and achieving the preoperative goals without uneventfully.
The aim of this article has been, on the one hand, to describe the use of MSICS (manual small incision cataract surgery) for the management of cataracts, especially mature ones, in relation to its particular utility in the field of humanitarian campaigns, for which a description of the MSICS technique has been made, subsequently a review of the available scientific literature has been carried out to verify the results of this technique in comparison with phacoemulsification and extracapsular surgery and to describe the importance of teaching this technique to all cataract surgeons, especially the ones participating in humanitarian campaigns. According to what has been found, MSICS is an excellent surgical technique and according to current evidence it seems to be the choice over phacoemulsification and/or the classic extracapsular technique in hyper mature cataracts, especially in the field of humanitarian campaigns, due to its lower rate of complications and the improvement in visual acuity obtained. According to the studies found, it would be possible for the experienced ophthalmologic surgeon to implement this technique since the learning curve is short. In addition, in the scenario of humanitarian campaigns, the cost per surgery and the surgical time are reduced. It can be concluded that MSICS should be part of the surgical repertoire of every cataract surgeon, especially in those who perform surgeries in humanitarian campaigns, since it provides shorter surgical time, lower cost and better results in complex cases.