Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS最新文献

Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) are a commonly used species in biomedical research. As social creatures, compatible guinea pigs should be housed together unless scientific objectives or veterinary care require otherwise. Extensive literature suggests that adult male guinea pigs are highly aggressive in the presence of females, but data are lacking regarding the compatibility of cohoused adult males in the absence of females. Most studies that use adult males do not report housing densities. We used serial wound scoring and observations of behavior to determine whether unfamiliar adult male guinea pigs will develop stable, prosocial isosexual pairs. Wound scoring was performed before and 24 h after pairing. Serial behavioral observations assessed affiliative and agonistic behaviors at 0.5, 2, 24, and 48 h after pairing. Wound scoring and behavioral observations continued weekly for 1 mo and monthly thereafter. Wound scores were significantly higher at 24 h after pairing as compared with baseline and all other time points. Wounding was rare after week 2, indicating reduced aggression. Furthermore, affiliative behaviors significantly increased over time while agonistic behaviors were rare. Together, these data suggest that unfamiliar adult male guinea pigs establish stable prosocial pairs after an acclimation period. As was done in the present study, providing ample space, separate shelters for each animal, and the absence of female guinea pigs will likely facilitate successful pairing. We recommend consideration of a social housing program for adult male guinea pigs to provide companionship and enrich their housing environment.

The effects of commonly used injectable combinations of anesthetics such as ketamine and xylazine, with or without acepromazine, vary widely across individuals, have a shallow-dose response curve, and do not provide long-term analgesia. These drawbacks indicate the importance of continuing efforts to develop safe and effective injectable anesthetic combinations for mice. In this study, a series of experiments was designed to validate the use of dexmedetomidine and midazolam to provide chemical restraint for nonpainful procedures and the addition of buprenorphine or extended-release buprenorphine to reliably provide a surgical plane of anesthesia in C57BL/6J mice. Loss of consciousness was defined as the loss of the righting reflex (LORR); a surgical plane of anesthesia was defined as the LORR and loss of pedal withdrawal after application of a 300 g noxious stimulus to a hind paw. The combination of intraperitoneal 0.25 mg/kg dexmedetomidine and 6 mg/kg midazolam produced LORR, sufficient for nonpainful or noninvasive procedures, without achieving a surgical plane in 19 of 20 mice tested. With the addition of subcutaneous 0.1 mg/kg buprenorphine or 1 mg/kg buprenorphine-ER, 29 of 30 mice achieved a surgical plane of anesthesia. The safety and efficacy of the regimen was then tested by successfully performing a laparotomy in 6 mice. No deaths occurred in any trial, and, when administered 1 mg/kg atipamezole IP, all mice recovered their righting reflex within 11 min. The anesthetic regimen developed in this study is safe, is reversible, and includes analgesics that previous studies have shown provide analgesia beyond the immediate postsurgical period. Buprenorphine-ER can be safely substituted for buprenorphine for longer-lasting analgesia.

Although the Guide suggests changing rodent cage components every 2 wk, it states that "decreased sanitation frequency may be justified if the microenvironment in the cages, under the condition of use ..., is not compromised." The purpose of this study was to evaluate extended sanitation intervals of cage components (automated watering valve, wire bar lid, and filter top) of mouse individually ventilated caging (IVCs) at our institution. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in relative light units measured by ATP luminometry of these cage components at the control time point of 14 d as compared with each extended time interval: 28, 56, and 84 d. In addition, for automated watering valves, the study was extended to 168 d. We also hypothesized that time-and-motion studies performed by moving to a sanitation interval of 84 d for all components would result in substantial time and cost savings. The components of a total of 24 cages containing 4 or 5 mice each were swabbed, and an ATP luminometer was used to detect organic matter. We found no significant differences in organic matter load between 14 d and all other time points for all cage components. Our time- and cost-savings analysis found that extending the sanitation interval of cage components from every 2 wk (14 d) to every 3 mo (84 d) for every 10,000 cages would save about 3,000 technician hours annually, for a total annual labor cost savings of about $100,000. This study is the first to validate the extended sanitation interval of automated watering valves and confirms the findings of previous studies that validated the extended sanitation frequency of wire bar lids and filter tops of rodent IVCs. Overall, extending the sanitation frequency of cage components reduces workload of animal care staff without compromising the cage microenvironment.

Neonatal rodents undergo anesthesia for numerous procedures and for euthanasia by anesthetic overdose. However, data regarding whether neonatal anesthesia is humane are limited. Hypothermia (cryoanesthesia) is the most commonly used anesthetic protocol for neonatal rats 10 d of age or younger. However, hypothermia has recently been restricted in several countries due to perceived painful effects, including pain on rewarming. Minimizing the potential pain and distress of neonates in research is imperative, although very challenging. Traditional validated and nonvalidated behavioral and physiologic outcome measures used for adult rats undergoing anesthesia are unsuitable for evaluating neonates. Therefore, we investigated the effects of several anesthetic methods on neonatal rats by using the innovative objective approaches of noninvasive ultrasonic vocalizations and more invasive neuroendocrine responses (i. e., serum corticosterone, norepinephrine, glucose). Our results show that hypothermia leads to heightened acute distress in neonatal rats as indicated by prolonged recovery times, increased duration of vocalizations, and elevated corticosterone levels, as compared with neonates undergoing inhalational anesthesia. We demonstrate that inhalational anesthesia is preferable to cryoanesthesia for neonatal rats, and researchers using hypothermia anesthesia should consider using inhalational anesthesia as an alternative method.

Low-stress handling methods have been studied in detail in mice, but relatively little research exists concerning preferred handling methods in rats. Most recommendations for low-stress handling of rats have been extrapolated from the mouse literature, despite known differences in handler interaction between the 2 species. The goal of the current study was to evaluate common methods of handling in rats, including application of recognized, low-stress handling methods from other species to rats, in order to determine relative stress levels associated with the handling methods. Seventy male and 70 female, 8-wk-old, Crl:CDSD rats, were housed either individually or in pairs, and were handled weekly or daily using one of the following methods: encircling of the torso (standard thoracic hold), handled using a tunnel, handled using a protective bite glove, handled using a soft paper towel, or tickled prior to being handled by the torso ( n = 10 per sex per treatment group). Body weight and clinical observations were scored at each handling session, abbreviated functional observation batteries were performed every other week, and an interaction test and hematology were conducted prior to study and on the day of study termination. Rats that were socially housed and handled weekly using the standard thoracic hold showed the least evidence of stress, while those that were singly housed and handled weekly using a protective bite glove or tunnel showed the highest level of stress. These effects were predominantly seen in males. This study suggests that standard low-stress handling methods used for other species may not be optimal for rats, and that additional research is needed to identify alternative methods to the standard thoracic hold that would further reduce stress during handling in rats.

Current mouse handling methods during cage change procedures can cause stress and potentially compromise animal welfare. Our previous study of breeding C57BL/6J mice found modest increases in pup production and a significant reduction in preweaning litter losses when mice were handled using a tunnel as compared with a tail-lift with padded forceps. The current study evaluated how these 2 handling methods affected reproduction by 2 additional mouse strains, BALB/cJ (a low- to intermediate-fecundity strain) and CD-1 IGS (a high-fecundity stock). We predicted that refined handling would have minimal effects on the high-fecundity line with a satisfactory production rate and greater effects on the low-fecundity line. Handling method (tunnel compared with tail-lift) was randomly assigned to monogamous breeding pairs of mice. Reproductive metrics (litter size at birth and weaning, numbers of litters, litter attrition, between-litter intervals, pup wean- ing weight, and sex ratio) were prospectively monitored for 80 BALB/cJ and 77 CD-1 pairs that were bred continuously for 6 mo. Both strains of mice were highly productive, exceeding previously published breeding data. However, neither strain demonstrated operational or statistically significant differences between handling methods for any reproduction metric. As we detected no negative effects in these 2 strains and the benefits are clear in other strains, refined handling should be considered for all breeding mice.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of a new extended-release formulation of buprenorphine (BupBaseER) at a dose that would produce pain management of the desired duration. A secondary objective was to compare the incidence of injection site reactions between the original extended-release formulation (BupHClER) and BupBaseER, which uses a different proprietary polymer-based vehicle than does the BupHClER formulation. Eighteen cynomolgus macaques (M. fascicularis) were divided into 2 groups. Each macaque in the first group (n = 6) received a single subcutaneous injection of 0.06 mg/kg BupBaseER (10 mg/mL) followed at least 2 wk later by a single subcutaneous injection of 0.12 mg/kg. Animals in group 2 (n = 12) received 2 injections of each of 3 compounds-the original polymer matrix vehicle used in BupHClER, the modified polymer matrix vehicle used in BupBaseER, and 0.9% saline-in designated areas of the dorsoscapular region. The 0.06- and 0.12-mg/kg doses both maintained therapeutic levels that were 3 times higher than the hypothesized analgesic threshold of 0.1 ng/mL. These doses maintained therapeutic level for approximately 44 and 103 h, respectively. Based on these data, buprenorphine concentration likely remains well above the therapeutic threshold beyond the 120 h span of this study. During the 30 d after administration, one macaque had a mild skin reaction to BupHClER. None of the animals in either group had skin reactions to BupBaseER at either dosage. These findings support the use of BupBaseER to provide pain management, promote animal welfare, decrease animal stress, and simplify the postoperative management of NHP in research and zoological settings.