Background: To evaluate and compare salivary osteocalcin concentrations in individuals with dental implants, stratified according to smoking status.
Materials and methods: In total, 100 participants were recruited, comprising 50 smokers and 50 non-smokers. All the patients underwent dental implant therapy. Collection of salivary samples was done and analyzed for osteocalcin levels. The data obtained were systematically tabulated, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.
Results: Group I (non-smokers) consisted of 50 individuals, while Group II (smokers) also comprised 50 individuals. The mean salivary osteocalcin concentration was 2.58 ng/mL in the non-smoker group and 1.69 ng/mL in the smoker group, indicating a substantial reduction among smokers.
Conclusion: Patients rehabilitated with dental implants who reported tobacco use exhibited diminished salivary osteocalcin concentrations when compared with their non-smoking counterparts, suggesting an adverse influence of smoking on peri-implant bone metabolic activity.
{"title":"Assessment of Salivary Osteocalcin Level Among Smokers and Non-Smokers Undergoing Dental Implants: An Observational Study.","authors":"Sipra Sarin, Sahil Sarin, Deepa Venkatesh, Kartiki Mehrotra, Shreanshi Jolly, Abhidi","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1511_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1511_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate and compare salivary osteocalcin concentrations in individuals with dental implants, stratified according to smoking status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 100 participants were recruited, comprising 50 smokers and 50 non-smokers. All the patients underwent dental implant therapy. Collection of salivary samples was done and analyzed for osteocalcin levels. The data obtained were systematically tabulated, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group I (non-smokers) consisted of 50 individuals, while Group II (smokers) also comprised 50 individuals. The mean salivary osteocalcin concentration was 2.58 ng/mL in the non-smoker group and 1.69 ng/mL in the smoker group, indicating a substantial reduction among smokers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients rehabilitated with dental implants who reported tobacco use exhibited diminished salivary osteocalcin concentrations when compared with their non-smoking counterparts, suggesting an adverse influence of smoking on peri-implant bone metabolic activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S75-S77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995072/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147481499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-22DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1612_25
Hitesh Athwani, Kuhu Awasthi, Meghna Athwani, Rajeev Pandey
Problem considered: This investigation attempts to design and deploy a bespoke Random Forest model for early rate prediction of Type-II Diabetes utilizing the dataset available from NFHS-5.
Methods: Hyperparameter optimization was carried out to boost the performance of a Random Forest algorithm. Missing value treatments and class imbalance problems were done utilizing SMOTE. Accuracy, recall, log loss and ROC-AUC were utilized to test the model's performance.
Results: The accuracy, recall, log loss, and ROC-AUC score were 73.48%, 74.40%, 54.17%, and 81.17%, respectively. The study also indicates that demographic, lifestyle, comorbidities, and specific physiological characteristics significantly influence the prediction of diabetes.
Conclusion: Random Forest algorithms are extremely effective with early diabetes detection and could help support the design of focused intervention and policy measures.
{"title":"Machine Learning Driven Insights into Socio-Economic, Demographic, and Health Determinants of Type-II Diabetes: A Tuned Hyperparameter Random Forest Model Using NFHS-5 Data.","authors":"Hitesh Athwani, Kuhu Awasthi, Meghna Athwani, Rajeev Pandey","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1612_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1612_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem considered: </strong>This investigation attempts to design and deploy a bespoke Random Forest model for early rate prediction of Type-II Diabetes utilizing the dataset available from NFHS-5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hyperparameter optimization was carried out to boost the performance of a Random Forest algorithm. Missing value treatments and class imbalance problems were done utilizing SMOTE. Accuracy, recall, log loss and ROC-AUC were utilized to test the model's performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy, recall, log loss, and ROC-AUC score were 73.48%, 74.40%, 54.17%, and 81.17%, respectively. The study also indicates that demographic, lifestyle, comorbidities, and specific physiological characteristics significantly influence the prediction of diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Random Forest algorithms are extremely effective with early diabetes detection and could help support the design of focused intervention and policy measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S182-S184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995050/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital chrononutrition integrates wearable sensors, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and smart mobile applications to enable precision-based meal timing tailored to each individual's circadian and metabolic patterns. Wearables track biological rhythms, such as sleep cycles, heart rate variability, and body temperature to define optimal meal windows. CGMs capture detailed glucose profiles, highlighting how meals consumed at different times affect postprandial glycemic responses. When these data streams are combined via intelligent apps, users receive real-time, customized guidance on advancing or delaying meals to match peaks in insulin sensitivity. This has the potential to lead to improved glycemic control and metabolic stability compared to conventional static dietary advice. However, widespread adoption, especially in resource-limited settings, faces challenges stemming from high device costs, infrastructure gaps (electricity and internet), limited digital literacy, and insufficient local support. Overcoming these obstacles through subsidies, community health worker training, culturally tailored app design, and robust infrastructure can make precision chrononutrition a scalable and equitable solution in global diabetes care.
{"title":"Digital Tools and Chrononutrition: The Role of Wearables, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, and Apps.","authors":"Sushil Kumar, Abha Kumari, Deepak Kumar, Himel Mondal","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1253_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1253_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital chrononutrition integrates wearable sensors, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and smart mobile applications to enable precision-based meal timing tailored to each individual's circadian and metabolic patterns. Wearables track biological rhythms, such as sleep cycles, heart rate variability, and body temperature to define optimal meal windows. CGMs capture detailed glucose profiles, highlighting how meals consumed at different times affect postprandial glycemic responses. When these data streams are combined via intelligent apps, users receive real-time, customized guidance on advancing or delaying meals to match peaks in insulin sensitivity. This has the potential to lead to improved glycemic control and metabolic stability compared to conventional static dietary advice. However, widespread adoption, especially in resource-limited settings, faces challenges stemming from high device costs, infrastructure gaps (electricity and internet), limited digital literacy, and insufficient local support. Overcoming these obstacles through subsidies, community health worker training, culturally tailored app design, and robust infrastructure can make precision chrononutrition a scalable and equitable solution in global diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S10-S12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995077/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Proper pain control before subarachnoid block (SAB) is must in proximal femur fractures as patients cannot tolerate movement due to severe pain. This study compares ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (USG-FICB) with femoral nerve block (USG-FNB) for pre-SAB analgesia.
Materials and methods: Ninety patients scheduled for elective femur fracture surgery under SAB were randomly divided. Group FICB received 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group FNB got 15 ml. Pain was assessed using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scale. Time for first rescue dose, side effects, and patient satisfaction also noted.
Results: Both groups had similar baseline NRS. Group FICB showed faster pain relief and better positioning comfort during SAB (NRS 3.00 vs. 4.28 P = 0.001). Time to first rescue analgesia was more in FICB (4.67 vs. 2.71 h P = 0.001). Satisfaction scores were also higher. Hemodynamics stayed stable, and adverse events were rare.
Conclusion: USG-FICB is more effective than USG-FNB in controlling pain before SAB in femur fracture surgery.
背景:股骨近端骨折患者由于剧烈疼痛无法忍受活动,因此在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)前必须适当控制疼痛。本研究比较超声引导下髂筋膜间室阻滞(USG-FICB)与股神经阻滞(USG-FNB)在sab前镇痛的效果。材料与方法:随机分组90例择期股骨骨折手术患者。FICB组给予0.25%布比卡因25 ml, FNB组给予0.25%布比卡因15 ml。采用数值评定量表(NRS)评定疼痛。第一次抢救剂量的时间、副作用和患者满意度也被记录下来。结果:两组基线NRS相似。FICB组在SAB过程中疼痛缓解更快,体位舒适度更好(NRS 3.00 vs. 4.28 P = 0.001)。FICB组首次抢救镇痛时间更长(4.67 h vs. 2.71 h P = 0.001)。满意度得分也更高。血流动力学保持稳定,不良事件很少发生。结论:USG-FICB比USG-FNB对股骨骨折手术SAB前疼痛的控制更有效。
{"title":"A Comparative Study to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block versus Femoral Nerve Block for Positioning for Subarachnoid Block in Proximal Femur Fracture.","authors":"Monika Gandhi, Rashpal Singh Gill, Aishwarya Sharma, Manish Banjare","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1239_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1239_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper pain control before subarachnoid block (SAB) is must in proximal femur fractures as patients cannot tolerate movement due to severe pain. This study compares ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (USG-FICB) with femoral nerve block (USG-FNB) for pre-SAB analgesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety patients scheduled for elective femur fracture surgery under SAB were randomly divided. Group FICB received 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group FNB got 15 ml. Pain was assessed using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scale. Time for first rescue dose, side effects, and patient satisfaction also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had similar baseline NRS. Group FICB showed faster pain relief and better positioning comfort during SAB (NRS 3.00 vs. 4.28 <i>P</i> = 0.001). Time to first rescue analgesia was more in FICB (4.67 vs. 2.71 h <i>P</i> = 0.001). Satisfaction scores were also higher. Hemodynamics stayed stable, and adverse events were rare.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>USG-FICB is more effective than USG-FNB in controlling pain before SAB in femur fracture surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S87-S89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) affect over a billion people globally, primarily in low- and middle-income countries. These diseases contribute significantly to morbidity, disability, and poverty, yet receive inadequate attention in global health policies and funding frameworks. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2018 and 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised original research, policy reviews, and global reports on WHO-recognized NTDs. A total of 15 articles were included, selected based on methodological rigor and relevance. Data were synthesized into thematic categories, including burden, interventions, and policy. Studies revealed significant geographical and health disparities, with disruptions due to COVID-19, underfunding, and poor integration into primary care. Effective strategies included WASH integration, translational technologies, and policy alignment with Universal Health Coverage. Research gaps persist in pediatric populations and community-level participation. Addressing NTDs requires resilient, multisectoral approaches embedded within primary healthcare systems. Global efforts must prioritize equity, local adaptation, and sustainable financing to meet 2030 elimination targets.
被忽视的热带病影响着全球超过10亿人,主要分布在低收入和中等收入国家。这些疾病在很大程度上造成了发病率、残疾和贫困,但在全球卫生政策和筹资框架中却没有得到足够的重视。在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science中对2018年至2024年发表的研究进行了系统的文献检索。纳入标准包括关于世卫组织承认的被忽视热带病的原始研究、政策审查和全球报告。根据方法的严谨性和相关性,共纳入了15篇文章。数据被综合成专题类别,包括负担、干预措施和政策。研究揭示了巨大的地理和健康差异,包括COVID-19造成的中断、资金不足以及初级保健整合不足。有效的战略包括整合讲卫生运动、转化技术以及与全民健康覆盖相一致的政策。在儿科人群和社区层面的参与方面,研究差距仍然存在。解决被忽视的热带病需要在初级卫生保健系统中采用有弹性的多部门方法。全球努力必须优先考虑公平、地方适应和可持续融资,以实现2030年的消除目标。
{"title":"Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sandip Ganpatbhai Patel, Mahir Modi, Kavya Darji, Saumil Darji, Yerrolla Jyotsna, Pradeep Subbaiah, Heena Dixit Tiwari","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_940_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_940_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) affect over a billion people globally, primarily in low- and middle-income countries. These diseases contribute significantly to morbidity, disability, and poverty, yet receive inadequate attention in global health policies and funding frameworks. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2018 and 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised original research, policy reviews, and global reports on WHO-recognized NTDs. A total of 15 articles were included, selected based on methodological rigor and relevance. Data were synthesized into thematic categories, including burden, interventions, and policy. Studies revealed significant geographical and health disparities, with disruptions due to COVID-19, underfunding, and poor integration into primary care. Effective strategies included WASH integration, translational technologies, and policy alignment with Universal Health Coverage. Research gaps persist in pediatric populations and community-level participation. Addressing NTDs requires resilient, multisectoral approaches embedded within primary healthcare systems. Global efforts must prioritize equity, local adaptation, and sustainable financing to meet 2030 elimination targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S23-S25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995150/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-29DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1725_25
R Ambika Kumari, Vishwas Sangappa Madhudi, Alan Winston David, K S Ashwini, Anagha Jukanti, Jyoti Warad
Introduction: QMix is a newer formulation known to be a more effective irrigant. A polypropylene canal brush facilitates the introduction of surfactant in the canal.
Objective: To assess the efficacy of QMix with canal brush to eliminate smear layer and debris in a root canal that is instrumented with ProTaper Next and WaveOne files under scanning electron microscope.
Methods: Forty single-rooted premolars were allocated into four groups:1) ProTaper Next file, 2) ProTaper Next file + Rotary Canal Brush, 3) WaveOne file, 4) WaveOne file + Rotary Canal Brush. All files were used up to size 40 in their respective tapering. For irrigation, sodium hypochlorite (5.25%) was used throughout instrumentation and QMix was used after instrumentation. The rotary canal brush in assigned groups was used for 30 sec along with QMix, followed by irrigation with 5ml distilled water. The roots were sectioned into two halves and analyzed under SEM.
Results: The mean scores for debris and smear layer were lesser in WaveOne and WaveOne with canal brush groups compared to other groups.
Conclusion: The use of canal brush created cleaner canal walls than without canal brush. The most superior results were delivered by WaveOne rotary file.
{"title":"Efficacy of QMix with Canal Brush for Removal of Debris and Smear Layer in Root Canals Instrumented with ProTaper Next and WaveOne File.","authors":"R Ambika Kumari, Vishwas Sangappa Madhudi, Alan Winston David, K S Ashwini, Anagha Jukanti, Jyoti Warad","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1725_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1725_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>QMix is a newer formulation known to be a more effective irrigant. A polypropylene canal brush facilitates the introduction of surfactant in the canal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of QMix with canal brush to eliminate smear layer and debris in a root canal that is instrumented with ProTaper Next and WaveOne files under scanning electron microscope.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty single-rooted premolars were allocated into four groups:1) ProTaper Next file, 2) ProTaper Next file + Rotary Canal Brush, 3) WaveOne file, 4) WaveOne file + Rotary Canal Brush. All files were used up to size 40 in their respective tapering. For irrigation, sodium hypochlorite (5.25%) was used throughout instrumentation and QMix was used after instrumentation. The rotary canal brush in assigned groups was used for 30 sec along with QMix, followed by irrigation with 5ml distilled water. The roots were sectioned into two halves and analyzed under SEM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores for debris and smear layer were lesser in WaveOne and WaveOne with canal brush groups compared to other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of canal brush created cleaner canal walls than without canal brush. The most superior results were delivered by WaveOne rotary file.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S62-S65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995135/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-12DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1501_25
Anitabh Sukhadeve, Amit Suthar, Rahul G Daga
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained significant traction in health care, particularly in automating documentation processes. AI-generated emergency department (ED) summaries have the potential to enhance hospital handoff efficiency and improve patient outcomes. However, their accuracy, reliability, and impact on clinical workflow remain underexplored. This study evaluates AI-generated ED summaries in comparison with traditional physician-written reports concerning handoff efficiency, documentation time, and patient safety.
Materials and methods: A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital over six months. A total of 500 ED patients were included, randomly assigned into two groups: AI-generated summaries (n = 250) and physician-written summaries (n = 250). The AI model utilized for summary generation was trained using natural language processing (NLP) techniques. Key evaluation parameters included handoff completion time, documentation accuracy, physician satisfaction (measured on a 5-point Likert scale), and adverse patient events. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v. 26, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results: The AI-generated summaries significantly reduced handoff completion time (8.2 ± 1.5 min vs. 12.7 ± 2.1 min, P < 0.001). Documentation accuracy was comparable between AI-generated and traditional reports (92.4% vs. 94.1%, P = 0.07). Physician satisfaction was higher for AI-generated summaries (4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.01). Adverse events were not significantly different between the groups (2.4% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.62).
Conclusion: AI-generated ED summaries demonstrate significant potential in enhancing hospital handoff efficiency by reducing completion time without compromising accuracy or patient safety. The findings suggest that AI integration into clinical documentation could improve workflow efficiency and physician satisfaction. Further large-scale studies are required to validate these results across different healthcare settings.
背景:人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域取得了重大进展,特别是在自动化文档处理方面。人工智能生成的急诊科(ED)摘要具有提高医院交接效率和改善患者预后的潜力。然而,它们的准确性、可靠性和对临床工作流程的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究将人工智能生成的ED摘要与传统的医生撰写的报告在交接效率、记录时间和患者安全方面进行了比较。材料和方法:在一家三级医院进行了为期6个月的前瞻性、随机对照研究。共纳入500例ED患者,随机分为两组:人工智能生成的摘要(n = 250)和医生撰写的摘要(n = 250)。使用自然语言处理(NLP)技术训练用于摘要生成的人工智能模型。关键评估参数包括交接完成时间、文件准确性、医生满意度(以5分李克特量表测量)和患者不良事件。采用SPSS v. 26进行统计学分析,差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:人工智能生成的总结显著缩短了交接完成时间(8.2±1.5 min vs. 12.7±2.1 min, P < 0.001)。人工智能生成的报告与传统报告的准确性相当(92.4% vs. 94.1%, P = 0.07)。人工智能生成摘要的医生满意度更高(4.3±0.6比3.7±0.9,P < 0.01)。不良事件组间差异无统计学意义(2.4% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.62)。结论:人工智能生成的急诊摘要在不影响准确性或患者安全的情况下减少完成时间,从而提高医院交接效率方面显示出巨大的潜力。研究结果表明,将人工智能集成到临床文档中可以提高工作流程效率和医生满意度。需要进一步的大规模研究来验证不同医疗保健环境中的这些结果。
{"title":"Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Emergency Department Summaries and their Impact on Hospital Handoff Efficiency and Patient Outcomes.","authors":"Anitabh Sukhadeve, Amit Suthar, Rahul G Daga","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1501_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1501_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained significant traction in health care, particularly in automating documentation processes. AI-generated emergency department (ED) summaries have the potential to enhance hospital handoff efficiency and improve patient outcomes. However, their accuracy, reliability, and impact on clinical workflow remain underexplored. This study evaluates AI-generated ED summaries in comparison with traditional physician-written reports concerning handoff efficiency, documentation time, and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital over six months. A total of 500 ED patients were included, randomly assigned into two groups: AI-generated summaries (n = 250) and physician-written summaries (n = 250). The AI model utilized for summary generation was trained using natural language processing (NLP) techniques. Key evaluation parameters included handoff completion time, documentation accuracy, physician satisfaction (measured on a 5-point Likert scale), and adverse patient events. Statistical analysis was performed using <b>SPSS v. 26</b>, with significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-generated summaries significantly reduced handoff completion time (8.2 ± 1.5 min vs. 12.7 ± 2.1 min, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Documentation accuracy was comparable between AI-generated and traditional reports (92.4% vs. 94.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.07). Physician satisfaction was higher for AI-generated summaries (4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 0.9, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Adverse events were not significantly different between the groups (2.4% vs. 2.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-generated ED summaries demonstrate significant potential in enhancing hospital handoff efficiency by reducing completion time without compromising accuracy or patient safety. The findings suggest that AI integration into clinical documentation could improve workflow efficiency and physician satisfaction. Further large-scale studies are required to validate these results across different healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S54-S56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995112/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: This randomized controlled clinical trial compared the radiographic periapical healing outcomes of single-visit versus multiple-visit root canal treatments for teeth with apical periodontitis.
Materials and methods: Thirty patients with single-rooted teeth diagnosed with primary apical periodontitis were randomly allocated to either a single-visit (n = 15) or a multiple-visit (n = 15) group. Periapical healing was radiographically evaluated using the Periapical Index (PAI) score at baseline and at 6 and 12-month follow-up appointments.
Results: The results showed no statistically significant difference in the radiographic healing rates between the two groups at either follow-up period. The success rates (PAI score ≤2) were 93.3% for the single-visit group and 86.7% for the multiple-visit group at 12 months (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that both treatment protocols are equally effective in achieving periapical healing, challenging the necessity of an inter-appointment intracanal medicament.
{"title":"Radiographic Evaluation of Periapical Healing Following Single vs Multiple Visit Root Canal Treatment: A PAI Based Study.","authors":"Charan Teja Bobba, Ankita Grace Vijay, Varsha Aher, Jaskaran Singh, Ayushi Kejriwal, K Srinivasan, Aditya Ranjan","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1567_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1567_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This randomized controlled clinical trial compared the radiographic periapical healing outcomes of single-visit versus multiple-visit root canal treatments for teeth with apical periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients with single-rooted teeth diagnosed with primary apical periodontitis were randomly allocated to either a single-visit (n = 15) or a multiple-visit (n = 15) group. Periapical healing was radiographically evaluated using the Periapical Index (PAI) score at baseline and at 6 and 12-month follow-up appointments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed no statistically significant difference in the radiographic healing rates between the two groups at either follow-up period. The success rates (PAI score ≤2) were 93.3% for the single-visit group and 86.7% for the multiple-visit group at 12 months (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that both treatment protocols are equally effective in achieving periapical healing, challenging the necessity of an inter-appointment intracanal medicament.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S206-S208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995068/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections, contributing to significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with early SSIs in patients undergoing elective neurosurgery and laparotomy at a tertiary care center in central India.
Material and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over one year, including 721 patients who underwent elective neurosurgical or laparotomy procedures. Data on demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis timing, and surgical duration were collected. SSIs were identified using CDC/NHSN criteria, and microbiological evaluation was performed for infected cases.
Results: The overall prevalence of SSIs was 15.53%, with higher incidence among patients aged 21-60 years and males. Diabetes mellitus was the most common comorbidity in SSI patients. SSIs were more frequent in laparotomy cases compared to neurosurgery. Notably, over half of the infected patients had received prophylactic antibiotics within 30 minutes before incision.
Conclusion: SSIs remain a substantial postoperative complication, particularly in diabetic and laparotomy patients. Adherence to comprehensive infection control practices beyond antibiotic timing is crucial to minimize infection risk.
{"title":"Prevalence and Profile of Early Surgical Site Infections Following Elective Neurosurgery and Laparotomy: An Observational Study.","authors":"Ashish Agrawal, Sandeep Thakre, Jeevan Shetty, Purti Tripathi, Ashutosh K Srivastava","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1378_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1378_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections, contributing to significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with early SSIs in patients undergoing elective neurosurgery and laparotomy at a tertiary care center in central India.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted over one year, including 721 patients who underwent elective neurosurgical or laparotomy procedures. Data on demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis timing, and surgical duration were collected. SSIs were identified using CDC/NHSN criteria, and microbiological evaluation was performed for infected cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of SSIs was 15.53%, with higher incidence among patients aged 21-60 years and males. Diabetes mellitus was the most common comorbidity in SSI patients. SSIs were more frequent in laparotomy cases compared to neurosurgery. Notably, over half of the infected patients had received prophylactic antibiotics within 30 minutes before incision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SSIs remain a substantial postoperative complication, particularly in diabetic and laparotomy patients. Adherence to comprehensive infection control practices beyond antibiotic timing is crucial to minimize infection risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S224-S226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and physical properties of antibiotic-modified GIC, propolis-incorporated GIC, and conventional GIC.
Study design: An antibiotic mixture containing ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and doxycycline and propolis tincture were mixed with GIC to obtain two study groups and Fuji IX as a control group. Antibacterial action, fluoride release, and physical properties were evaluated.
Results: Addition of antibiotics and propolis to GIC increased its antimicrobial action without negatively modifying physical properties of conventional GIC.
Conclusion: Hence, the incorporation of antibiotics and propolis into GIC provided an acceptable combination of properties.
{"title":"Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Physical Properties of Antibiotic-Modified, Propolis-Added, and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement.","authors":"Akangsha Gaur, Monika Sharma, Bhawna Gupta, Tarun Gupta, Meena J Shah, Akshaya Deshpande, Miral Mehta","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1323_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1323_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and physical properties of antibiotic-modified GIC, propolis-incorporated GIC, and conventional GIC.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An antibiotic mixture containing ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and doxycycline and propolis tincture were mixed with GIC to obtain two study groups and Fuji IX as a control group. Antibacterial action, fluoride release, and physical properties were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Addition of antibiotics and propolis to GIC increased its antimicrobial action without negatively modifying physical properties of conventional GIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hence, the incorporation of antibiotics and propolis into GIC provided an acceptable combination of properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"S84-S86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}