Pub Date : 2023-05-05DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000215
Félix Lévesque
military keeps a vigilant watch on those who attempt to get too deep into its politics. But Balochistan is one of Pakistan’s four major provinces, and it seems an oversight not to devote a chapter to the ethnic parties that dominate its political landscape. Second, the editors point to how this volume adds to a burgeoning literature on political parties and party systems in non-Western, developing contexts. But there is little theoretical discussion on where Pakistan falls on the “hybrid regime” spectrum or what the scope conditions of some of the claims are. But these are minor points that should not detract from the major contributions of this volume. It will serve as an excellent resource to all those interested in gaining—and teaching—a broad yet nuanced overview of Pakistan’s party system.
{"title":"Canadian Club: Birthright Citizenship and National Belonging Lois Harder, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022, pp. 216","authors":"Félix Lévesque","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000215","url":null,"abstract":"military keeps a vigilant watch on those who attempt to get too deep into its politics. But Balochistan is one of Pakistan’s four major provinces, and it seems an oversight not to devote a chapter to the ethnic parties that dominate its political landscape. Second, the editors point to how this volume adds to a burgeoning literature on political parties and party systems in non-Western, developing contexts. But there is little theoretical discussion on where Pakistan falls on the “hybrid regime” spectrum or what the scope conditions of some of the claims are. But these are minor points that should not detract from the major contributions of this volume. It will serve as an excellent resource to all those interested in gaining—and teaching—a broad yet nuanced overview of Pakistan’s party system.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"494 - 495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73640785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-02DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000239
Jessica Kolopenuk
Abstract Pretendianism is a problem in academia (and of whiteness). Its long-standing existence is well researched and analyzed in the academic record, and it has been brought to wider audiences through news and social media. In response, task forces, committees and advisory councils are being created in universities to determine stronger identity validation policies, with emphasis on engaging relationships with local Indigenous nations, communities, elders, and knowledge holders. Policy making, including processes and procedures of identity validation, will be a powerful apparatus going forward to administer indigeneity in universities. This approach will also lead to the intensification of Indigenous definition and regulation by predominantly non-Indigenous institutions. This article proposes a set of complementary extrapolicy practices addressing pretendianism worth exploring and that emerge from the everyday embodied vantage points of Indigenous academics. We must (continue to) name whiteness, model Indigenous relationality and learn from Indigenous women's leadership.
{"title":"The Pretendian Problem","authors":"Jessica Kolopenuk","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000239","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pretendianism is a problem in academia (and of whiteness). Its long-standing existence is well researched and analyzed in the academic record, and it has been brought to wider audiences through news and social media. In response, task forces, committees and advisory councils are being created in universities to determine stronger identity validation policies, with emphasis on engaging relationships with local Indigenous nations, communities, elders, and knowledge holders. Policy making, including processes and procedures of identity validation, will be a powerful apparatus going forward to administer indigeneity in universities. This approach will also lead to the intensification of Indigenous definition and regulation by predominantly non-Indigenous institutions. This article proposes a set of complementary extrapolicy practices addressing pretendianism worth exploring and that emerge from the everyday embodied vantage points of Indigenous academics. We must (continue to) name whiteness, model Indigenous relationality and learn from Indigenous women's leadership.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"468 - 473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88108298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-28DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000100
Vincent Hopkins, A. Lawlor
Abstract Much of political science rests on assumptions about how policy makers and citizens behave. However, questions remain about how public policy can improve the government–citizen relationship. In this research note, we present behavioural insights (BI) as one way to address this gap. First, we argue that BI can be strategically used both to alleviate administrative burdens and to enhance citizen experience. Second, we argue that BI interventions can assist in several stages of the policy process, strengthening causal inferences about policy efficacy. Third, we present original data from Canada's ongoing experimentation with BI across multiple jurisdictions and areas of public policy. We conclude by acknowledging the myriad pathways through which BI research can engage with public policy to support the enhancement of citizen-oriented service delivery.
{"title":"Behavioural Insights and Public Policy in Canada","authors":"Vincent Hopkins, A. Lawlor","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000100","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Much of political science rests on assumptions about how policy makers and citizens behave. However, questions remain about how public policy can improve the government–citizen relationship. In this research note, we present behavioural insights (BI) as one way to address this gap. First, we argue that BI can be strategically used both to alleviate administrative burdens and to enhance citizen experience. Second, we argue that BI interventions can assist in several stages of the policy process, strengthening causal inferences about policy efficacy. Third, we present original data from Canada's ongoing experimentation with BI across multiple jurisdictions and areas of public policy. We conclude by acknowledging the myriad pathways through which BI research can engage with public policy to support the enhancement of citizen-oriented service delivery.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"435 - 450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72849071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-26DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000112
Richard Johnston
Abstract This article brings three decades of broadly consistent survey data on survey respondents’ feelings about the parties as evidence of affective polarization. It also presents evidence about policy differences among the parties and makes an explicit link between elite and mass data with multilevel modelling. The article shows that affective polarization is real and also demonstrates its connection to the ideological landscape. But it also shows that conceptual categories originating in the United States must be adapted to Canada's multiparty system and to the continuing contrasts between Quebec and the rest of Canada. It suggests that accounts of Canada's twentieth-century party system may not apply to the twenty-first century.
{"title":"Affective Polarization in the Canadian Party System, 1988–2021","authors":"Richard Johnston","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000112","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article brings three decades of broadly consistent survey data on survey respondents’ feelings about the parties as evidence of affective polarization. It also presents evidence about policy differences among the parties and makes an explicit link between elite and mass data with multilevel modelling. The article shows that affective polarization is real and also demonstrates its connection to the ideological landscape. But it also shows that conceptual categories originating in the United States must be adapted to Canada's multiparty system and to the continuing contrasts between Quebec and the rest of Canada. It suggests that accounts of Canada's twentieth-century party system may not apply to the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"180 1","pages":"372 - 395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83008086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-20DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000124
Maxime Blanchard
Abstract In 1974, Richard Simeon and David Elkins published an influential analysis of provincial political cultures. Nearly half a century later, their results still operate as the baseline against which new studies compare their own results. In this article, I re-examine their conclusions, combining five decades of Canadian public opinion survey data (1974–2019). The article replicates their analysis by focusing on three dimensions of political culture examined by Simeon and Elkins: political cynicism, internal political efficacy and external political efficacy. It also expands on their work by accounting for contextual factors that can potentially drive or hinder provincial differences in political culture. The results suggest that Simeon and Elkins’ interpretation of Canadian provincial political cultures needs to be updated, as the patterns they found differ markedly from those identified in this article.
{"title":"Reassessing Provincial Political Cultures: Evidence from Five Decades of Canadian Public Opinion Surveys (1974–2019)","authors":"Maxime Blanchard","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000124","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1974, Richard Simeon and David Elkins published an influential analysis of provincial political cultures. Nearly half a century later, their results still operate as the baseline against which new studies compare their own results. In this article, I re-examine their conclusions, combining five decades of Canadian public opinion survey data (1974–2019). The article replicates their analysis by focusing on three dimensions of political culture examined by Simeon and Elkins: political cynicism, internal political efficacy and external political efficacy. It also expands on their work by accounting for contextual factors that can potentially drive or hinder provincial differences in political culture. The results suggest that Simeon and Elkins’ interpretation of Canadian provincial political cultures needs to be updated, as the patterns they found differ markedly from those identified in this article.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"279 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76206173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-14DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000148
Mashail Malik
reference to what has become the “orthodox” view. As for approaching Marx’s ambivalent statements about rights in the German Ideology and elsewhere, the book tries to assess Marx’s positions in “real time”—that is, by examining where he stood when issues of justice, legality and rights were critically at stake. Examples include the 1843 petition by leaders of the Rhenish Jewish community for equal rights, which Marx endorsed; his consistent defence of civil and political rights during the European Revolutions of 1848; and his detailed reflections on legally enforced limits on the working day in Capital. In all these critical instances, Marx’s political actions speak louder than his ambivalent statements about rights. As Gray dutifully acknowledges, Revisiting Marx’s Critique of Liberalism offers a “ ‘reconstruction’ of Marx’s critique of liberal rights and law.” In Habermas’ terminology, a critical reconstruction “signifies taking a theory apart and putting it back together in a new form in order to attain more fully the goal that it has set for itself” (1979: 95). There are retrospective and prospective dimensions to the critical reconstruction that was pursued in the book. Retrospectively, the book revisits Marx’s critical reflections on justice, legality and rights, as well as their political reverberations in the twentieth century, taking stock of possible paths that remained untravelled. Prospectively, it looks to the present and foreseeable future, identifying features of Marx’s thought that remain prescient for a world confronting vast inequalities and exhibiting widespread assaults on hard-won rights and liberties.
{"title":"Pakistan's Political Parties: Surviving between Dictatorship and Democracy Mariam Mufti, Sahar Shafqat and Niloufer Siddiqui, eds., Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2020, pp. 336","authors":"Mashail Malik","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000148","url":null,"abstract":"reference to what has become the “orthodox” view. As for approaching Marx’s ambivalent statements about rights in the German Ideology and elsewhere, the book tries to assess Marx’s positions in “real time”—that is, by examining where he stood when issues of justice, legality and rights were critically at stake. Examples include the 1843 petition by leaders of the Rhenish Jewish community for equal rights, which Marx endorsed; his consistent defence of civil and political rights during the European Revolutions of 1848; and his detailed reflections on legally enforced limits on the working day in Capital. In all these critical instances, Marx’s political actions speak louder than his ambivalent statements about rights. As Gray dutifully acknowledges, Revisiting Marx’s Critique of Liberalism offers a “ ‘reconstruction’ of Marx’s critique of liberal rights and law.” In Habermas’ terminology, a critical reconstruction “signifies taking a theory apart and putting it back together in a new form in order to attain more fully the goal that it has set for itself” (1979: 95). There are retrospective and prospective dimensions to the critical reconstruction that was pursued in the book. Retrospectively, the book revisits Marx’s critical reflections on justice, legality and rights, as well as their political reverberations in the twentieth century, taking stock of possible paths that remained untravelled. Prospectively, it looks to the present and foreseeable future, identifying features of Marx’s thought that remain prescient for a world confronting vast inequalities and exhibiting widespread assaults on hard-won rights and liberties.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"99 1","pages":"492 - 494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75423637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-12DOI: 10.1017/s0008423923000136
Igor Shoikhedbrod
E. P. Thompson, who argues for the historical significance of struggles for rights and laws. Shoikhedbrod, using his interpretation of Marx’s critique of liberalism, provides a more systematic account of the importance of constitutionalism and the rule of law in constraining arbitrary power, providing essential space for contestation in egalitarian struggles, and forming crucial preconditions for the communism that will achieve right and legality in a higher form. The clear strength of Shoikhedbrod’s work is his engagement with the legal and juridical aspects of these debates. He offers an important corrective to the dismissive attitude found in some schools of Marxism. Shoikhedbrod also provides persuasive arguments for the enduring importance of rights, whatever the form of the society. If there is a limitation to the book, it is that Shoikhedbrod describes as “orthodox” the interpretation that Marx ultimately dismisses right and legality. This discounts the variety of disagreements between commentators and the different schools of thought in the long-running debates about Marx and justice. For example, Marx asserts, “As far as right is concerned, we with many others have stressed the opposition of communism to right, both political and private, as also in its most general form as the rights of man.” Shoikhedbrod contends that this assertion, like other similar assertions by Marx, has often been “taken out of context.” But Shoikhedbrod does not provide enough contextual evidence to refute common-sense interpretations of this passage as Marx’s plain disavowal of rights as such. (Admittedly, there are other passages where Marx does seem to affirm some notion of rights.) This book is unlikely to persuade many of the commentators who think that Marx regards his critique of capitalism, as well as his theory of communism, as beyond appeals to justice, though Shoikhedbrod might convince some of them that Marxism needs a robust theory of rights and, indeed, that Marx provides some resources for such a theory. Shoikhedbrod offers a spirited critique of liberalism and a good case for why no theory or practice, whether communist or otherwise, can dispense with rights and legality. Although Habermas once called himself “the last Marxist,” Shoikhedbrod’s book shows that, in our age of rising global inequality, this is not the last we have heard from Marx.
{"title":"Response to Paul Gray's review of Revisiting Marx's Critique of Liberalism","authors":"Igor Shoikhedbrod","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423923000136","url":null,"abstract":"E. P. Thompson, who argues for the historical significance of struggles for rights and laws. Shoikhedbrod, using his interpretation of Marx’s critique of liberalism, provides a more systematic account of the importance of constitutionalism and the rule of law in constraining arbitrary power, providing essential space for contestation in egalitarian struggles, and forming crucial preconditions for the communism that will achieve right and legality in a higher form. The clear strength of Shoikhedbrod’s work is his engagement with the legal and juridical aspects of these debates. He offers an important corrective to the dismissive attitude found in some schools of Marxism. Shoikhedbrod also provides persuasive arguments for the enduring importance of rights, whatever the form of the society. If there is a limitation to the book, it is that Shoikhedbrod describes as “orthodox” the interpretation that Marx ultimately dismisses right and legality. This discounts the variety of disagreements between commentators and the different schools of thought in the long-running debates about Marx and justice. For example, Marx asserts, “As far as right is concerned, we with many others have stressed the opposition of communism to right, both political and private, as also in its most general form as the rights of man.” Shoikhedbrod contends that this assertion, like other similar assertions by Marx, has often been “taken out of context.” But Shoikhedbrod does not provide enough contextual evidence to refute common-sense interpretations of this passage as Marx’s plain disavowal of rights as such. (Admittedly, there are other passages where Marx does seem to affirm some notion of rights.) This book is unlikely to persuade many of the commentators who think that Marx regards his critique of capitalism, as well as his theory of communism, as beyond appeals to justice, though Shoikhedbrod might convince some of them that Marxism needs a robust theory of rights and, indeed, that Marx provides some resources for such a theory. Shoikhedbrod offers a spirited critique of liberalism and a good case for why no theory or practice, whether communist or otherwise, can dispense with rights and legality. Although Habermas once called himself “the last Marxist,” Shoikhedbrod’s book shows that, in our age of rising global inequality, this is not the last we have heard from Marx.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"491 - 492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74580002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-31DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000197
Alana Cattapan, J. Patrick, Brenda Yuen
Abstract In December 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada heard arguments in a reference case about the constitutionality of An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families (the Act). At issue is whether the Act infringes on provincial jurisdiction and changes the constitutional architecture by giving First Nations law governing child welfare the force of federal law. In this short Currents article, we argue that the Supreme Court's consideration of the Act marks a critical juncture in the ongoing relationship between Canadian and Indigenous law. Through an examination of the arguments made before the Supreme Court, we assert that it is essential that the Court move beyond its historical commitments to protecting the Constitution and umpiring jurisdictional disputes and toward a recognition of the failures of the constitutional framework to account for an expansive understanding of inherent rights and inherent jurisdiction, including child welfare.
{"title":"Beyond the Constitutional Architecture: An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families at the Supreme Court of Canada","authors":"Alana Cattapan, J. Patrick, Brenda Yuen","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000197","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In December 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada heard arguments in a reference case about the constitutionality of An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families (the Act). At issue is whether the Act infringes on provincial jurisdiction and changes the constitutional architecture by giving First Nations law governing child welfare the force of federal law. In this short Currents article, we argue that the Supreme Court's consideration of the Act marks a critical juncture in the ongoing relationship between Canadian and Indigenous law. Through an examination of the arguments made before the Supreme Court, we assert that it is essential that the Court move beyond its historical commitments to protecting the Constitution and umpiring jurisdictional disputes and toward a recognition of the failures of the constitutional framework to account for an expansive understanding of inherent rights and inherent jurisdiction, including child welfare.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"112 1","pages":"483 - 489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80832570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1017/S0008423923000094
Simon Dabin
Dabin, Simon. 2022. « Participer ou s’autodéterminer ? Un état des lieux de la littérature décoloniale autochtone ». Revue canadienne de science politique 55 (4) : 939–957. Starblanket, Gina et Heidi Kiwetinepinesiik Stark. 2018. « Towards a Relational Paradigm-Four Points for Consideration : Knowledge, Gender, Land, and Modernity ». Dans M. Asch, J. Borrows et J. Tully (dir.), Resurgence and Reconciliation : Indigenous-Settler Relations and Earth Teachings (pp. 175–207). Toronto/Buffalo/London : University of Toronto Press. Wolfe, Patrick. 2006. « Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native ». Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4) : 387–409.
{"title":"Participer ou s'autodéterminer ? Un état des lieux de la littérature décoloniale autochtone–CORRIGENDUM","authors":"Simon Dabin","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000094","url":null,"abstract":"Dabin, Simon. 2022. « Participer ou s’autodéterminer ? Un état des lieux de la littérature décoloniale autochtone ». Revue canadienne de science politique 55 (4) : 939–957. Starblanket, Gina et Heidi Kiwetinepinesiik Stark. 2018. « Towards a Relational Paradigm-Four Points for Consideration : Knowledge, Gender, Land, and Modernity ». Dans M. Asch, J. Borrows et J. Tully (dir.), Resurgence and Reconciliation : Indigenous-Settler Relations and Earth Teachings (pp. 175–207). Toronto/Buffalo/London : University of Toronto Press. Wolfe, Patrick. 2006. « Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native ». Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4) : 387–409.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"255 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75602194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1017/s000842392200097x
Éléna Choquette
ique alors que, jusqu’à présent, les travaux sur le sujet étaient plutôt traités par des historiens ou des journalistes. Enfin, le texte est suffisamment vulgarisé pour intéresser un public large en raison de son format et de son style. Toutefois, le format atypique, engagé et court pourrait frustrer des universitaires désireux de lire une analyse empirique approfondie. À cet égard, l’ouvrage aurait pu fournir de plus amples explications concernant la méthodologie et quelques notions rhétoriques. Ces dernières pourraient rester obscures pour un public non-averti. Par ailleurs, l’ouvrage Reactionary Democracy: How Racism and the Populist Far Right Became Mainstream d’Aurélien Mondon et d’Aaron Winter (2020) pourrait répondre à quelques interrogations et fournir un cadre théorique très complet sur le processus de banalisation du racisme et de l’extrême-droite. Quoiqu’il en soit, cet essai représente une lecture très argumentée et documentée. De plus, il offre une riche introduction à la rhétorique pour mener une lecture critique et ouvrir la voie à de nouvelles études portées cette fois-ci sur les discours électoraux de Zemmour.
{"title":"Souverainetés et autodéterminations autochtones : Tïayoriho'ten’ Geneviève Nootens et Geneviève Motard (dir.), Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, 2022, pp. 270","authors":"Éléna Choquette","doi":"10.1017/s000842392200097x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s000842392200097x","url":null,"abstract":"ique alors que, jusqu’à présent, les travaux sur le sujet étaient plutôt traités par des historiens ou des journalistes. Enfin, le texte est suffisamment vulgarisé pour intéresser un public large en raison de son format et de son style. Toutefois, le format atypique, engagé et court pourrait frustrer des universitaires désireux de lire une analyse empirique approfondie. À cet égard, l’ouvrage aurait pu fournir de plus amples explications concernant la méthodologie et quelques notions rhétoriques. Ces dernières pourraient rester obscures pour un public non-averti. Par ailleurs, l’ouvrage Reactionary Democracy: How Racism and the Populist Far Right Became Mainstream d’Aurélien Mondon et d’Aaron Winter (2020) pourrait répondre à quelques interrogations et fournir un cadre théorique très complet sur le processus de banalisation du racisme et de l’extrême-droite. Quoiqu’il en soit, cet essai représente une lecture très argumentée et documentée. De plus, il offre une riche introduction à la rhétorique pour mener une lecture critique et ouvrir la voie à de nouvelles études portées cette fois-ci sur les discours électoraux de Zemmour.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"240 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87885822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：