首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Soil Science最新文献

英文 中文
Review of Soil Threats and Soil-Related Ecosystem Services European Maps: Can We Use Them to Study Their Relationships? 土壤威胁与土壤相关生态系统服务欧洲地图:我们可以利用它们研究它们之间的关系吗?
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70215
Jessica Reyes-Rojas, David Montagne, Nicolas P. A. Saby, João Augusto Coblinski, Sylwia Pindral, Eduardo Medina-Roldán, Romina Lorenzetti, Ottone Scammacca, Chiara Piccini, Luboš Borůvka, Sophie Cornu

The scientific concepts of soil threats (STs) and soil-related ecosystem services (SESs) are gaining importance and are fueling the debate on natural resources management and decision-making within the EU. The literature reports numerous assessments of individual STs and SESs at the European scale. However, a comprehensive overview of the patterns emerging from the relationships between STs and SESs is still lacking, which restricts the ability to limit soil degradation and its impact on SESs. In this article, we provide an in-depth analysis of existing European maps for three STs (soil organic carbon loss, erosion, and compaction) and four SESs (climate regulation and carbon sequestration, hydrological control, biomass production, and erosion control) and the feasibility of combining them to study their relationships. At the EU-level, 37 maps for these STs and 17 for these SESs were encountered. With the notable exception of erosion, these maps differ considerably in their conceptualization of STs and SESs, and in the indicators, methods, and databases used to assess them. In the current situation, the combination of individual maps of STs and SESs to study their relationships is rarely possible. Besides these limitations, we identify possible combinations and provide recommendations aimed at improving the compatibility between different STs/SESs maps. We conclude that there is a need for a more robust framework for conceptualizing STs/SESs and for systematically and precisely specifying the chosen indicators.

土壤威胁(STs)和土壤相关生态系统服务(SESs)的科学概念正变得越来越重要,并正在推动欧盟内部关于自然资源管理和决策的辩论。文献报道了在欧洲范围内对个体STs和SESs的大量评估。然而,从STs和SESs之间的关系中出现的模式的全面概述仍然缺乏,这限制了限制土壤退化及其对SESs的影响的能力。在本文中,我们深入分析了欧洲现有的三个STs(土壤有机碳损失、侵蚀和压实)和四个SESs(气候调节和碳固存、水文控制、生物质生产和侵蚀控制)的地图,以及将它们结合起来研究它们之间关系的可行性。在欧盟一级,遇到了37个这些STs和17个这些SESs的地图。除了侵蚀的显著例外,这些地图在STs和SESs的概念以及用于评估它们的指标、方法和数据库方面存在很大差异。在目前的情况下,结合STs和SESs的个体图谱来研究它们之间的关系是很少可能的。除了这些限制之外,我们还确定了可能的组合,并提供了旨在改善不同STs/SESs图之间兼容性的建议。我们的结论是,需要一个更强大的框架来概念化STs/SESs,并系统和精确地指定所选择的指标。
{"title":"Review of Soil Threats and Soil-Related Ecosystem Services European Maps: Can We Use Them to Study Their Relationships?","authors":"Jessica Reyes-Rojas,&nbsp;David Montagne,&nbsp;Nicolas P. A. Saby,&nbsp;João Augusto Coblinski,&nbsp;Sylwia Pindral,&nbsp;Eduardo Medina-Roldán,&nbsp;Romina Lorenzetti,&nbsp;Ottone Scammacca,&nbsp;Chiara Piccini,&nbsp;Luboš Borůvka,&nbsp;Sophie Cornu","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70215","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The scientific concepts of soil threats (STs) and soil-related ecosystem services (SESs) are gaining importance and are fueling the debate on natural resources management and decision-making within the EU. The literature reports numerous assessments of individual STs and SESs at the European scale. However, a comprehensive overview of the patterns emerging from the relationships between STs and SESs is still lacking, which restricts the ability to limit soil degradation and its impact on SESs. In this article, we provide an in-depth analysis of existing European maps for three STs (soil organic carbon loss, erosion, and compaction) and four SESs (climate regulation and carbon sequestration, hydrological control, biomass production, and erosion control) and the feasibility of combining them to study their relationships. At the EU-level, 37 maps for these STs and 17 for these SESs were encountered. With the notable exception of erosion, these maps differ considerably in their conceptualization of STs and SESs, and in the indicators, methods, and databases used to assess them. In the current situation, the combination of individual maps of STs and SESs to study their relationships is rarely possible. Besides these limitations, we identify possible combinations and provide recommendations aimed at improving the compatibility between different STs/SESs maps. We conclude that there is a need for a more robust framework for conceptualizing STs/SESs and for systematically and precisely specifying the chosen indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70215","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Divergent Microbial Responses to Straw Versus Biochar Shape Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Soil Aggregates 微生物对秸秆和生物炭的不同响应决定了土壤团聚体碳氮动态
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70199
Zijing Zhong, Anxin Wang, Yanke Zhang, Kunkun Wang, Zhifeng Lu, Xiaokun Li, Tao Ren, Wenju Zhang, Rihuan Cong, Jianwei Lu

Soil aggregates are fundamental structural units that host spatially distinct microbial communities, which drive carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stabilization through niche-specific biotic and abiotic processes. Yet, the mechanisms underlying microbial-mediated C/N stabilization across aggregate size fractions under different organic inputs remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted a long-term field experiment in a rice–oilseed rape rotation system with three treatments: chemical fertiliser alone (NPK), straw incorporation (NPKS), and biochar application (NPKB). Soil aggregates were fractionated into > 2 mm (large macroaggregates, LA), 0.25–2 mm (macroaggregates, MA), 0.053–0.25 mm (microaggregates, SA), and < 0.053 mm (silt + clay, XSA). Results showed that biochar preferentially enhanced C and N concentrations in finer fractions (< 0.053 mm), indicating enhanced long-term stabilization due to chemical recalcitrance and physical protection. In contrast, straw incorporation promoted complex microbial co-occurrence networks, enriched nitrogen fixation functions, and higher microbial diversity in microaggregates (0.053–0.25 mm), identifying this fraction as a microbial hotspot for dynamic C/N turnover. Moreover, the reduced abundance of chitin-degrading taxa and upregulation of nitrogen-conserving functions under NPKS implied a shift in microbial functional strategies under labile carbon input. These findings reveal contrasting pathways of aggregate-scale C/N stabilization driven by straw and biochar, underscoring the critical role of microaggregates as ecological interfaces linking microbial structure, function, and soil chemistry under organic amendments. These insights offer guidance for optimising organic input strategies to balance short-term nutrient activation and long-term carbon sequestration in sustainable agriculture.

土壤团聚体是承载空间上不同微生物群落的基本结构单元,它们通过特定生态位的生物和非生物过程驱动碳(C)和氮(N)的稳定。然而,在不同的有机投入下,微生物介导的碳氮稳定机制仍然知之甚少。本研究在水稻-油菜轮作系统中进行了3种处理的长期田间试验:单施化肥(NPK)、秸秆还田(NPKS)和生物炭(NPKB)。土壤团聚体分为2 mm(大团聚体,LA)、0.25-2 mm(大团聚体,MA)、0.053 - 0.25 mm(微团聚体,SA)和0.053 mm(粉土+粘土,XSA)。结果表明,生物炭优先提高了较细组分(0.053 mm)的C和N浓度,表明由于化学抵抗和物理保护而增强了长期稳定性。相比之下,秸秆添加促进了复杂的微生物共生网络,丰富了固氮功能,微团聚体(0.053-0.25 mm)的微生物多样性更高,这表明该组分是动态C/N转换的微生物热点。此外,NPKS下几丁质降解类群丰度的降低和氮素保存功能的上调暗示了不稳定碳输入下微生物功能策略的转变。这些发现揭示了秸秆和生物炭驱动的团聚体尺度C/N稳定的不同途径,强调了微团聚体作为有机修饰下连接微生物结构、功能和土壤化学的生态界面的关键作用。这些见解为优化有机投入策略提供了指导,以平衡可持续农业中的短期营养激活和长期碳固存。
{"title":"Divergent Microbial Responses to Straw Versus Biochar Shape Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Soil Aggregates","authors":"Zijing Zhong,&nbsp;Anxin Wang,&nbsp;Yanke Zhang,&nbsp;Kunkun Wang,&nbsp;Zhifeng Lu,&nbsp;Xiaokun Li,&nbsp;Tao Ren,&nbsp;Wenju Zhang,&nbsp;Rihuan Cong,&nbsp;Jianwei Lu","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70199","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Soil aggregates are fundamental structural units that host spatially distinct microbial communities, which drive carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stabilization through niche-specific biotic and abiotic processes. Yet, the mechanisms underlying microbial-mediated C/N stabilization across aggregate size fractions under different organic inputs remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted a long-term field experiment in a rice–oilseed rape rotation system with three treatments: chemical fertiliser alone (NPK), straw incorporation (NPKS), and biochar application (NPKB). Soil aggregates were fractionated into &gt; 2 mm (large macroaggregates, LA), 0.25–2 mm (macroaggregates, MA), 0.053–0.25 mm (microaggregates, SA), and &lt; 0.053 mm (silt + clay, XSA). Results showed that biochar preferentially enhanced C and N concentrations in finer fractions (&lt; 0.053 mm), indicating enhanced long-term stabilization due to chemical recalcitrance and physical protection. In contrast, straw incorporation promoted complex microbial co-occurrence networks, enriched nitrogen fixation functions, and higher microbial diversity in microaggregates (0.053–0.25 mm), identifying this fraction as a microbial hotspot for dynamic C/N turnover. Moreover, the reduced abundance of chitin-degrading taxa and upregulation of nitrogen-conserving functions under NPKS implied a shift in microbial functional strategies under labile carbon input. These findings reveal contrasting pathways of aggregate-scale C/N stabilization driven by straw and biochar, underscoring the critical role of microaggregates as ecological interfaces linking microbial structure, function, and soil chemistry under organic amendments. These insights offer guidance for optimising organic input strategies to balance short-term nutrient activation and long-term carbon sequestration in sustainable agriculture.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nitrification Inhibition: Uncertainties and Opportunities for Sustainable Agriculture 硝化抑制:可持续农业的不确定性和机遇
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70218
Mario Corrochano-Monsalve, Fabian Beeckman, Adrián Bozal-Leorri, Hans Motte, Fernando T. Maestre

In the contemporary discourse on sustainable development, reducing nitrogen (N) pollution is as critical as mitigating carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Nitrogen is a vital macronutrient for plant growth, and its application in fertilizers has significantly enhanced crop yields. However, intensive and inefficient N fertilization has led to serious environmental consequences, including water eutrophication, biodiversity loss, and increased emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), a potent greenhouse gas for which agriculture is the main anthropogenic source. Stabilizing fertilizers with nitrification inhibitors (NIs) presents a promising strategy to improve N use efficiency and mitigate N losses. Despite their demonstrated benefits, NI-stabilized fertilizers still represent only a minor share of the global fertilizer market. This opinion article explores the key uncertainties that may be limiting their broader adoption from an economic and ecological perspective. We examine current knowledge gaps regarding the effects of NIs on soil health and microbial communities, the potential for resistance development among nitrifiers, and the context-dependent variability in their field performance. We also emphasize the need for full life cycle assessments to evaluate whether their environmental benefits outweigh the costs associated with production and application. Finally, we propose strategies to optimize both the use and design of NIs, such as soil-specific application approaches, decoupling NI dosage from N rates, and the discovery of more potent and selective inhibitors. By addressing these uncertainties and proposing strategies for further improvement of current and novel NIs, NI-stabilized fertilizers could become a central tool for sustainable N management in agriculture.

在当代关于可持续发展的论述中,减少氮(N)污染与减少二氧化碳(CO2)排放同样重要。氮是植物生长的重要常量养分,在肥料中施用氮可显著提高作物产量。然而,密集和低效的氮肥施肥导致了严重的环境后果,包括水体富营养化、生物多样性丧失和一氧化二氮(N2O)排放增加。一氧化二氮是一种强效温室气体,农业是其主要人为来源。氮素抑制剂稳定肥料是提高氮素利用效率和减少氮素损失的一种有前景的策略。尽管具有明显的效益,镍稳定肥料仍然只占全球肥料市场的一小部分份额。这篇观点文章从经济和生态的角度探讨了可能限制其广泛采用的关键不确定性。我们研究了目前关于NIs对土壤健康和微生物群落的影响的知识差距,氮化物之间耐药性发展的潜力,以及它们在田间表现中的环境依赖性变异性。我们还强调需要进行全生命周期评估,以评价它们的环境效益是否超过与生产和应用有关的成本。最后,我们提出了优化NIs使用和设计的策略,如土壤特异性应用方法,将NI用量与N速率解耦,以及发现更有效和选择性的抑制剂。通过解决这些不确定性并提出进一步改进现有和新型氮肥的策略,稳定氮肥可能成为农业可持续氮肥管理的核心工具。
{"title":"Nitrification Inhibition: Uncertainties and Opportunities for Sustainable Agriculture","authors":"Mario Corrochano-Monsalve,&nbsp;Fabian Beeckman,&nbsp;Adrián Bozal-Leorri,&nbsp;Hans Motte,&nbsp;Fernando T. Maestre","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70218","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the contemporary discourse on sustainable development, reducing nitrogen (N) pollution is as critical as mitigating carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions. Nitrogen is a vital macronutrient for plant growth, and its application in fertilizers has significantly enhanced crop yields. However, intensive and inefficient N fertilization has led to serious environmental consequences, including water eutrophication, biodiversity loss, and increased emissions of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), a potent greenhouse gas for which agriculture is the main anthropogenic source. Stabilizing fertilizers with nitrification inhibitors (NIs) presents a promising strategy to improve N use efficiency and mitigate N losses. Despite their demonstrated benefits, NI-stabilized fertilizers still represent only a minor share of the global fertilizer market. This opinion article explores the key uncertainties that may be limiting their broader adoption from an economic and ecological perspective. We examine current knowledge gaps regarding the effects of NIs on soil health and microbial communities, the potential for resistance development among nitrifiers, and the context-dependent variability in their field performance. We also emphasize the need for full life cycle assessments to evaluate whether their environmental benefits outweigh the costs associated with production and application. Finally, we propose strategies to optimize both the use and design of NIs, such as soil-specific application approaches, decoupling NI dosage from N rates, and the discovery of more potent and selective inhibitors. By addressing these uncertainties and proposing strategies for further improvement of current and novel NIs, NI-stabilized fertilizers could become a central tool for sustainable N management in agriculture.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145317787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Visual Soil Structure Quality Is Mostly Explained by Small-Size Structural Pores 土壤结构质量主要由小尺寸结构孔隙来解释
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70216
Cédric Deluz, Alyssa Deluz, Thomas Keller, Sebastian Doetterl, Pascal Boivin

Visual assessment of soil structure receives growing interest but its physical meaning is still to be explored. This study examined the relationships between soil pore systems volume and size distribution and visual structure quality scores in undisturbed soil samples from Swiss cropland soils covering a wide range of soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay contents. Structure quality scores were determined with CoreVESS. The pore system volumes were quantified by shrinkage analysis, and the water retention curves were used to determine the equivalent pore-size distribution. CoreVESS scores showed non-linear relationships with total and structural pore volumes. They correlated mainly to structural porosity volume, whereas plasma pores did not explain structure quality scores. As a result, the total porosity was less correlated to CoreVESS than structural porosity. The small-size (< 50–100 μm equivalent diameter) structural pore volume showed the higher correlation to structure quality score. The small-size structural pore volume was mostly correlated with the SOC:clay ratio and, to a lesser extent, with SOC, highlighting the link between soil structure quality and clay-SOC complexation in these soils. Soils with SOC:clay ratios above 0.1 showed significantly larger volumes of small structural pores. Our findings underline the functional importance of these small-size structural pores, which are also accounting for air-water equilibrium close to field capacity, and were pointed out for their role as soil biota habitat. Their tight relationship with SOC suggests a good stability upon stresses and slow changes over time. In contrast, large structural pores, which are known to be sensitive to mechanical stress of soil fauna activity, were primarily influenced by carbonate content.

土壤结构的视觉评价受到越来越多的关注,但其物理意义仍有待探索。本研究研究了瑞士农田未受干扰土壤样品中土壤孔隙系统体积和大小分布与视觉结构质量评分之间的关系,涵盖了广泛的土壤有机碳(SOC)和粘土含量。结构质量评分采用CoreVESS测定。通过收缩分析对孔隙系统体积进行量化,并利用保水曲线确定等效孔径分布。CoreVESS分数与总孔隙体积和结构孔隙体积呈非线性关系。它们主要与结构孔隙体积相关,而等离子体孔隙不能解释结构质量分数。因此,总孔隙度与CoreVESS的相关性小于构造孔隙度。小尺寸(<; 50 ~ 100 μm当量直径)结构孔隙体积与结构质量评分相关性较高。小尺寸结构孔隙体积主要与有机碳:粘土比相关,与有机碳相关程度较低,突出了土壤结构质量与粘土-有机碳复合关系的关系。有机碳:粘土比大于0.1的土壤结构孔隙体积显著增大。我们的发现强调了这些小尺寸结构孔隙的功能重要性,它们也解释了接近野外容量的空气-水平衡,并指出了它们作为土壤生物群栖息地的作用。它们与SOC的紧密关系表明在压力下具有良好的稳定性,随时间变化缓慢。相比之下,对土壤动物活动的机械应力敏感的大结构孔隙主要受碳酸盐含量的影响。
{"title":"Visual Soil Structure Quality Is Mostly Explained by Small-Size Structural Pores","authors":"Cédric Deluz,&nbsp;Alyssa Deluz,&nbsp;Thomas Keller,&nbsp;Sebastian Doetterl,&nbsp;Pascal Boivin","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70216","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Visual assessment of soil structure receives growing interest but its physical meaning is still to be explored. This study examined the relationships between soil pore systems volume and size distribution and visual structure quality scores in undisturbed soil samples from Swiss cropland soils covering a wide range of soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay contents. Structure quality scores were determined with CoreVESS. The pore system volumes were quantified by shrinkage analysis, and the water retention curves were used to determine the equivalent pore-size distribution. CoreVESS scores showed non-linear relationships with total and structural pore volumes. They correlated mainly to structural porosity volume, whereas plasma pores did not explain structure quality scores. As a result, the total porosity was less correlated to CoreVESS than structural porosity. The small-size (&lt; 50–100 μm equivalent diameter) structural pore volume showed the higher correlation to structure quality score. The small-size structural pore volume was mostly correlated with the SOC:clay ratio and, to a lesser extent, with SOC, highlighting the link between soil structure quality and clay-SOC complexation in these soils. Soils with SOC:clay ratios above 0.1 showed significantly larger volumes of small structural pores. Our findings underline the functional importance of these small-size structural pores, which are also accounting for air-water equilibrium close to field capacity, and were pointed out for their role as soil biota habitat. Their tight relationship with SOC suggests a good stability upon stresses and slow changes over time. In contrast, large structural pores, which are known to be sensitive to mechanical stress of soil fauna activity, were primarily influenced by carbonate content.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70216","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145317336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stakeholders' Perspectives on the Current State and Transition to Sustainable Soil Management Across Europe 利益相关者对欧洲可持续土壤管理现状和转型的看法
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70214
Mansonia Pulido-Moncada, Tiffanie Faye Stone, Jonna Løvlund Bach, Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe, Lars J. Munkholm, Valentina Baratella, Silvia Vanino, Roberta Farina, Claire Chenu, Sophie Cornu, Eloïse Mason, Saskia Keesstra, Anke M. Herrmann, Jennie Barron, Bo Stenberg, Klaus A. Jarosch, Rok Mihelič, Sara Mavsar, Maria da Conceição Gonçalves, Nádia Luísa Castanheira, Tove Ortman, Péter László, David Ramler, Sevinc Madenoglu, Hesna Ozcan, Johanna Leppälä, Greet Ruysschaert, Benjamin S. Gimeno, Bruno Huyghebaert, Raimonds Kasparinskis, Grzegorz Siebielec, Karolina Swiatek

Implementing sustainable soil management practices to enhance soil health is a priority in research and policymaking across Europe. There is a need to identify the main soil challenges faced by different European stakeholders and the critical threats limiting the adoption of sustainable management of agricultural soils. The present study analyses stakeholders' perspectives on key soil challenges, knowledge gaps, and priorities for agricultural soil research across partner countries that participated in the European Joint Programme on Soil (EJP SOIL) 2020–2025. Two complementary stakeholder activities—a survey and a workshop—were conducted across 24 partner countries (divided into four regions: Central, Northern, Southern, and Western Europe) of the EJP SOIL consortium in 2024. Among 10 pre-identified soil challenges, the findings highlight that maintaining or increasing soil organic carbon, avoiding soil sealing, and avoiding soil erosion are the top three priorities across Europe. However, the perceived prioritisation of soil challenges differed both between and within regions, reflecting each country's specific soil health context. Divergences in perceptions between practitioners and other stakeholder groups underscore the need to develop actions aimed at better understanding the rationale behind such discrepancies and how to overcome them. In addition, other key challenges for achieving sustainable soil management across Europe include limited funding, policy incoherencies, poor knowledge dissemination and co-creation, and insufficient soil monitoring. Environmental factors influencing soil health, including climate change, together with governance and economic models, were perceived to be critical limitations to the adoption of sustainable management of agricultural soils. This study also emphasises the need for a diversity of engagement methods, policies, and system approaches to support a transition towards sustainable soil management. These findings underscore the need for future research agendas that focus on integrated knowledge and participatory approaches, and strategies involving societal awareness and policy alignment—key elements that have also informed broader strategies involving societal awareness and engagement towards sustainable soil management in Europe.

实施可持续土壤管理做法以增进土壤健康是整个欧洲研究和决策的优先事项。有必要确定欧洲不同利益相关者面临的主要土壤挑战,以及限制采用农业土壤可持续管理的关键威胁。本研究分析了参与欧洲土壤联合计划(EJP soil) 2020-2025的伙伴国的利益相关者对关键土壤挑战、知识缺口和农业土壤研究优先事项的看法。2024年,在EJP SOIL联盟的24个伙伴国家(分为中欧、北欧、南欧和西欧四个地区)开展了两项互补的利益相关者活动——一项调查和一次研讨会。在预先确定的10项土壤挑战中,研究结果强调,保持或增加土壤有机碳、避免土壤密封和避免土壤侵蚀是整个欧洲的三大优先事项。然而,对土壤挑战的优先次序的认识在区域之间和区域内都有所不同,这反映了每个国家具体的土壤健康背景。从业人员和其他利益相关者群体之间的观念分歧强调需要制定旨在更好地理解这些差异背后的基本原理以及如何克服这些差异的行动。此外,在整个欧洲实现可持续土壤管理的其他关键挑战包括资金有限、政策不连贯、知识传播和共同创造不力以及土壤监测不足。影响土壤健康的环境因素,包括气候变化,以及治理和经济模式,被认为是采用可持续农业土壤管理的关键限制因素。本研究还强调需要多样化的参与方法、政策和系统方法,以支持向可持续土壤管理的过渡。这些发现强调了未来研究议程的必要性,重点是综合知识和参与性方法,以及涉及社会意识和政策协调的战略——这些关键要素也为欧洲可持续土壤管理的社会意识和参与的更广泛战略提供了信息。
{"title":"Stakeholders' Perspectives on the Current State and Transition to Sustainable Soil Management Across Europe","authors":"Mansonia Pulido-Moncada,&nbsp;Tiffanie Faye Stone,&nbsp;Jonna Løvlund Bach,&nbsp;Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe,&nbsp;Lars J. Munkholm,&nbsp;Valentina Baratella,&nbsp;Silvia Vanino,&nbsp;Roberta Farina,&nbsp;Claire Chenu,&nbsp;Sophie Cornu,&nbsp;Eloïse Mason,&nbsp;Saskia Keesstra,&nbsp;Anke M. Herrmann,&nbsp;Jennie Barron,&nbsp;Bo Stenberg,&nbsp;Klaus A. Jarosch,&nbsp;Rok Mihelič,&nbsp;Sara Mavsar,&nbsp;Maria da Conceição Gonçalves,&nbsp;Nádia Luísa Castanheira,&nbsp;Tove Ortman,&nbsp;Péter László,&nbsp;David Ramler,&nbsp;Sevinc Madenoglu,&nbsp;Hesna Ozcan,&nbsp;Johanna Leppälä,&nbsp;Greet Ruysschaert,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Gimeno,&nbsp;Bruno Huyghebaert,&nbsp;Raimonds Kasparinskis,&nbsp;Grzegorz Siebielec,&nbsp;Karolina Swiatek","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70214","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Implementing sustainable soil management practices to enhance soil health is a priority in research and policymaking across Europe. There is a need to identify the main soil challenges faced by different European stakeholders and the critical threats limiting the adoption of sustainable management of agricultural soils. The present study analyses stakeholders' perspectives on key soil challenges, knowledge gaps, and priorities for agricultural soil research across partner countries that participated in the European Joint Programme on Soil (EJP SOIL) 2020–2025. Two complementary stakeholder activities—a survey and a workshop—were conducted across 24 partner countries (divided into four regions: Central, Northern, Southern, and Western Europe) of the EJP SOIL consortium in 2024. Among 10 pre-identified soil challenges, the findings highlight that maintaining or increasing soil organic carbon, avoiding soil sealing, and avoiding soil erosion are the top three priorities across Europe. However, the perceived prioritisation of soil challenges differed both between and within regions, reflecting each country's specific soil health context. Divergences in perceptions between practitioners and other stakeholder groups underscore the need to develop actions aimed at better understanding the rationale behind such discrepancies and how to overcome them. In addition, other key challenges for achieving sustainable soil management across Europe include limited funding, policy incoherencies, poor knowledge dissemination and co-creation, and insufficient soil monitoring. Environmental factors influencing soil health, including climate change, together with governance and economic models, were perceived to be critical limitations to the adoption of sustainable management of agricultural soils. This study also emphasises the need for a diversity of engagement methods, policies, and system approaches to support a transition towards sustainable soil management. These findings underscore the need for future research agendas that focus on integrated knowledge and participatory approaches, and strategies involving societal awareness and policy alignment—key elements that have also informed broader strategies involving societal awareness and engagement towards sustainable soil management in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70214","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145317337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organic Carbon Storage Capacity by Association With Minerals in Tropical Alkaline Soils 热带碱性土壤有机碳储量与矿物质的关系
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70213
Mayuko Seki, Eito Nonomura, Hidetoshi Miyazaki, Muniandi Jegadeesan, Pandian Kannan, Haruo Tanaka, Soh Sugihara

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is essential for maintaining soil functioning as well as for mitigating climate change. SOC stabilisation in mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) fraction plays a key role, and MAOM distribution should be quantified in divergent environments to improve predictions of SOC dynamics. However, quantitative information on the OC storage capacity of MAOM based on MAOM distribution is still limited, especially in tropical alkaline soils, which might have a lower OC storage capacity because of weaker interactions between C and clay via cation bridges such as Ca and Mg, compared to common Al-, Fe-organo-metal complexes in tropical acidic soils. This study aimed to evaluate the OC storage capacity of MAOM based on the relationship between the mass proportion (%) and OC content in MAOM (g C kg−1 soil) in 46 tropical alkaline surface soils of southern India with variable soil types (Alfisols, Inceptisols, and Vertisols) and land uses (paddy fields, croplands, and bushes). Boundary line analysis was used to estimate the upper distribution of MAOM-C for our dataset, and the slope of the regression line (0.16, R1 = 0.16, p < 0.001) was substantially lower compared to that in a previous review of tropic soils (0.53, R1 = 0.46, p < 0.005) mainly conducted on acidic to neutral soils (Fujisaki et al., 2018). We found that MAOM-C content was positively correlated with Caex, Mgex, and clay, and was well predicted by Mgex both in a simple and multiple linear regression model. Considering the alkaline soil pH of dataset (8.0 ± 0.1), these results indicate that a lower OC storage capacity in this study might be attributed to the weaker interactions between OC and minerals via cation bridges in tropical alkaline soils. There were no significant differences in the slope of the linear regression lines between soil types and land uses, except that the slope in Alfisols was greater than that in Vertisols, and all the slopes were consistently lower than that of Fujisaki et al. (2018), similar to that of the boundary line analysis for the whole dataset. Our results provide direct evidence that tropical alkaline soils have a substantially lower organic carbon storage capacity as MAOM than that of tropical acidic to neutral soils. Further study is necessary to elucidate the factors controlling the low OC storage capacity in this area.

土壤有机碳(SOC)对于维持土壤功能和减缓气候变化至关重要。矿物伴生有机质(mineral - associated有机质,MAOM)组分中有机碳的稳定起着关键作用,MAOM在不同环境中的分布应该被量化,以提高对有机碳动态的预测。然而,基于MAOM分布的MAOM储OC能力的定量信息仍然有限,特别是在热带碱性土壤中,与热带酸性土壤中常见的Al -, Fe -有机-金属配合物相比,C与粘土之间通过阳离子桥(如Ca和Mg)的相互作用较弱,可能具有较低的OC储OC能力。在印度南部46种不同土壤类型(Alfisols、ineptisols和Vertisols)和土地利用(水田、农田和灌木)的热带碱性表层土壤中,基于MAOM (g C kg - 1土壤)质量比例(%)和OC含量(g C kg - 1土壤)之间的关系,评价MAOM的OC储存能力。使用边界线分析来估计我们数据集的MAOM‐C的上分布,回归线的斜率(0.16,R1 = 0.16, p < 0.001)大大低于之前主要在酸性至中性土壤上进行的热带土壤(0.53,R1 = 0.46, p < 0.005) (Fujisaki et al., 2018)。我们发现MAOM - C含量与Caex, Mgex和clay呈正相关,并且Mgex在简单和多元线性回归模型中都能很好地预测MAOM - C含量。考虑到数据集的碱性土壤pH值(8.0±0.1),这些结果表明,热带碱性土壤中OC与矿物质之间通过阳离子桥的相互作用较弱,可能是本研究中OC储存容量较低的原因。土壤类型和土地利用之间线性回归线的斜率没有显著差异,除了Alfisols的斜率大于Vertisols的斜率,并且所有斜率都始终低于Fujisaki等人(2018)的斜率,这与整个数据集的边界线分析相似。结果表明,热带碱性土壤的MAOM有机碳储量明显低于热带酸性至中性土壤。对该地区低储气量的控制因素有必要进一步研究。
{"title":"Organic Carbon Storage Capacity by Association With Minerals in Tropical Alkaline Soils","authors":"Mayuko Seki,&nbsp;Eito Nonomura,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Miyazaki,&nbsp;Muniandi Jegadeesan,&nbsp;Pandian Kannan,&nbsp;Haruo Tanaka,&nbsp;Soh Sugihara","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70213","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70213","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is essential for maintaining soil functioning as well as for mitigating climate change. SOC stabilisation in mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) fraction plays a key role, and MAOM distribution should be quantified in divergent environments to improve predictions of SOC dynamics. However, quantitative information on the OC storage capacity of MAOM based on MAOM distribution is still limited, especially in tropical alkaline soils, which might have a lower OC storage capacity because of weaker interactions between C and clay via cation bridges such as Ca and Mg, compared to common Al-, Fe-organo-metal complexes in tropical acidic soils. This study aimed to evaluate the OC storage capacity of MAOM based on the relationship between the mass proportion (%) and OC content in MAOM (g C kg<sup>−1</sup> soil) in 46 tropical alkaline surface soils of southern India with variable soil types (Alfisols, Inceptisols, and Vertisols) and land uses (paddy fields, croplands, and bushes). Boundary line analysis was used to estimate the upper distribution of MAOM-C for our dataset, and the slope of the regression line (0.16, <i>R</i><sup>1</sup> = 0.16, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) was substantially lower compared to that in a previous review of tropic soils (0.53, <i>R</i><sup>1</sup> = 0.46, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005) mainly conducted on acidic to neutral soils (Fujisaki et al., 2018). We found that MAOM-C content was positively correlated with Ca<sub>ex</sub>, Mg<sub>ex</sub>, and clay, and was well predicted by Mg<sub>ex</sub> both in a simple and multiple linear regression model. Considering the alkaline soil pH of dataset (8.0 ± 0.1), these results indicate that a lower OC storage capacity in this study might be attributed to the weaker interactions between OC and minerals via cation bridges in tropical alkaline soils. There were no significant differences in the slope of the linear regression lines between soil types and land uses, except that the slope in Alfisols was greater than that in Vertisols, and all the slopes were consistently lower than that of Fujisaki et al. (2018), similar to that of the boundary line analysis for the whole dataset. Our results provide direct evidence that tropical alkaline soils have a substantially lower organic carbon storage capacity as MAOM than that of tropical acidic to neutral soils. Further study is necessary to elucidate the factors controlling the low OC storage capacity in this area.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145289148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
More Microbial Function Than Taxonomic Convergence in Soil Straw Decomposition 土壤秸秆分解的微生物功能大于分类收敛
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70211
Haifeng Lin, Yuanyuan Bao, Ruirui Chen, Xin Zhou, Youzhi Feng

Bacteria and fungi are key agents in plant residue decomposition, and their roles are determined by their taxonomic and functional compositions. However, the spatiotemporal patterns of microbial diversity, particularly functional traits, remain poorly understood. To close this gap, we conducted a 16-week field-based rice straw burial experiment coupled with amplicon sequencing. Random forest (RF) analysis revealed that soil chemical properties (available potassium (AK), pH, and soil organic matter (SOM)) and climate factors (MAP and MAT) were the main predictors of bacterial and fungal taxonomic composition, explaining 46.9% and 27.3% of the variation, respectively. In contrast, the functional composition related to straw decomposition was less influenced, with these factors explaining 0% of the variation for bacteria and 31.4% for fungi. The distance–decay relationship (DDR) model further showed significant spatiotemporal differences in the taxonomic composition between straw-decomposing fungi and bacteria, with fungi exhibiting greater variability, as indicated by a steeper slope (−2E−04) than that for bacteria (−9E−05). However, the functional composition related to straw decomposition showed no significant spatiotemporal variation. Our results demonstrate that the taxonomic variability of straw-degrading bacteria and fungi is shaped by distinct environmental factors, whereas their functional composition remains stable across space and time, reflecting functional redundancy in terms of straw decomposition.

细菌和真菌是植物残渣分解的关键因子,它们的作用是由它们的分类和功能组成决定的。然而,微生物多样性的时空格局,特别是功能特征,仍然知之甚少。为了缩小这一差距,我们进行了为期16周的稻田秸秆掩埋实验,并结合扩增子测序。随机森林(RF)分析表明,土壤化学性质(速效钾(AK)、pH和土壤有机质(SOM))和气候因子(MAP和MAT)是细菌和真菌分类组成的主要预测因子,分别解释了46.9%和27.3%的变异。相比之下,与秸秆分解相关的功能组成受到的影响较小,这些因素对细菌和真菌的影响分别为0%和31.4%。距离-衰减关系(DDR)模型进一步显示了秸秆分解真菌和细菌在分类组成上的显著时空差异,真菌表现出更大的变异性,其斜率(- 2E−04)比细菌(- 9E−05)更陡。而与秸秆分解相关的功能组成没有明显的时空变化。研究结果表明,秸秆降解细菌和真菌的分类变异性受到不同环境因素的影响,而它们的功能组成在空间和时间上保持稳定,反映了秸秆分解的功能冗余。
{"title":"More Microbial Function Than Taxonomic Convergence in Soil Straw Decomposition","authors":"Haifeng Lin,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Bao,&nbsp;Ruirui Chen,&nbsp;Xin Zhou,&nbsp;Youzhi Feng","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70211","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70211","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Bacteria and fungi are key agents in plant residue decomposition, and their roles are determined by their taxonomic and functional compositions. However, the spatiotemporal patterns of microbial diversity, particularly functional traits, remain poorly understood. To close this gap, we conducted a 16-week field-based rice straw burial experiment coupled with amplicon sequencing. Random forest (RF) analysis revealed that soil chemical properties (available potassium (AK), pH, and soil organic matter (SOM)) and climate factors (MAP and MAT) were the main predictors of bacterial and fungal taxonomic composition, explaining 46.9% and 27.3% of the variation, respectively. In contrast, the functional composition related to straw decomposition was less influenced, with these factors explaining 0% of the variation for bacteria and 31.4% for fungi. The distance–decay relationship (DDR) model further showed significant spatiotemporal differences in the taxonomic composition between straw-decomposing fungi and bacteria, with fungi exhibiting greater variability, as indicated by a steeper slope (−2E−04) than that for bacteria (−9E−05). However, the functional composition related to straw decomposition showed no significant spatiotemporal variation. Our results demonstrate that the taxonomic variability of straw-degrading bacteria and fungi is shaped by distinct environmental factors, whereas their functional composition remains stable across space and time, reflecting functional redundancy in terms of straw decomposition.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145247001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional Microbial Diversity and Soil Health Assessment in Organic and Conventional Rice-Jute Based Cropping Systems 有机与常规稻黄麻种植系统的功能微生物多样性与土壤健康评价
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70212
Sonali Paul Mazumdar, Bijan Majumdar, Nurnabi Meherul Alam, Lipi Chattopadhyay, Debarati Datta, Sourav Ghosh, Subrata Satpathy, A. Shamna, S. K. Jha, Sabyasachi Mitra, Sanjoy Saha, Gouranga Kar

Knowledge about the structural and functional microbial diversity influencing the biochemical properties and biological processes of soils in rice-jute based cropping systems in Eastern India is limited. In the present study, the Biolog EcoPlate technique was used to evaluate microbial metabolic diversity in long-term organically managed (OM) and conventional (CM) rice-jute based cropping systems for predicting soil quality in farmers' fields in Eastern India. The six cropping systems that were undertaken for this study were rice-lentil-jute (OM), rice-mustard-jute (OM), rice-potato-jute (OM), rice-lentil-jute (CM), rice-mustard-jute (CM), and rice-potato-jute (CM). The results of the present study revealed significant improvement in total soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), labile C or permanganate oxidizable C (KMnO4-C), soil enzymatic activities, carbon lability index (LI), carbon management index (CMI), and Soil Quality Index (SQI) in organic production systems compared to conventionally managed cropping systems. The average well colour development, utilisation of carbon substrates, Shannon-Weaver index (H), and Mcintosh (U) indices showed a significant variation among the cropping systems. Principal component analysis revealed a clear distinction between the organic and conventional production systems, suggesting that organically managed rice-jute based cropping systems have a more significant impact on microbial diversity compared to conventionally managed rice-jute based cropping systems. Furthermore, the results indicated a clear ranking of drivers, with management having a greater influence than crop rotation on soil abiotic and biotic properties, as even the rice-potato-jute system under organic management outperformed the rice-lentil-jute system under conventional practice. Among the cropping systems, rice-lentil-jute (OM) had the largest SOC, LI, CMI, Shannon-Weaver index, and Mcintosh indices, and SQI, followed by rice-mustard-jute (OM) and rice-potato-jute (OM). The present findings suggest that adopting the organically managed rice-lentil-jute system is pivotal for maintaining soil health and promoting agricultural sustainability in rice-jute based cropping systems and is highly recommended for the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains.

关于结构和功能微生物多样性影响印度东部水稻-黄麻种植系统土壤生化特性和生物过程的知识是有限的。在本研究中,biog EcoPlate技术用于评估长期有机管理(OM)和传统(CM)水稻-黄豆种植系统的微生物代谢多样性,以预测印度东部农民田地的土壤质量。本研究采用了水稻-扁豆-黄麻(OM)、水稻-芥菜-黄麻(OM)、水稻-土豆-黄麻(OM)、水稻-扁豆-黄麻(CM)、水稻-芥菜-黄麻(CM)和水稻-土豆-黄麻(CM)六种种植制度。结果表明,与常规耕作制度相比,有机生产制度显著提高了土壤总有机碳(SOC)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)、活性碳或高锰酸盐可氧化碳(KMnO4‐C)、土壤酶活性、碳不稳定性指数(LI)、碳管理指数(CMI)和土壤质量指数(SQI)。平均井色发育、碳基质利用率、Shannon - Weaver指数(H)和Mcintosh指数(U)显示了不同种植制度之间的显著差异。主成分分析揭示了有机和传统生产系统之间的明显区别,表明有机管理的水稻黄麻种植系统对微生物多样性的影响比传统管理的水稻黄麻种植系统更显著。此外,研究结果还显示了驱动因素的明确排序,其中管理对土壤非生物和生物特性的影响大于轮作,因为即使是有机管理下的水稻-马铃薯-黄麻系统也优于常规管理下的水稻-扁豆-黄麻系统。其中,水稻-小豆豆-黄麻(OM)的有机碳、LI、CMI、Shannon - Weaver指数、Mcintosh指数和SQI最大,其次是水稻-芥菜-黄麻(OM)和水稻-马铃薯-黄麻(OM)。目前的研究结果表明,采用有机管理的水稻-扁豆-黄麻系统对于维持土壤健康和促进以水稻-黄麻为基础的种植系统的农业可持续性至关重要,强烈推荐用于东印度-恒河平原。
{"title":"Functional Microbial Diversity and Soil Health Assessment in Organic and Conventional Rice-Jute Based Cropping Systems","authors":"Sonali Paul Mazumdar,&nbsp;Bijan Majumdar,&nbsp;Nurnabi Meherul Alam,&nbsp;Lipi Chattopadhyay,&nbsp;Debarati Datta,&nbsp;Sourav Ghosh,&nbsp;Subrata Satpathy,&nbsp;A. Shamna,&nbsp;S. K. Jha,&nbsp;Sabyasachi Mitra,&nbsp;Sanjoy Saha,&nbsp;Gouranga Kar","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70212","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70212","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Knowledge about the structural and functional microbial diversity influencing the biochemical properties and biological processes of soils in rice-jute based cropping systems in Eastern India is limited. In the present study, the Biolog EcoPlate technique was used to evaluate microbial metabolic diversity in long-term organically managed (OM) and conventional (CM) rice-jute based cropping systems for predicting soil quality in farmers' fields in Eastern India. The six cropping systems that were undertaken for this study were rice-lentil-jute (OM), rice-mustard-jute (OM), rice-potato-jute (OM), rice-lentil-jute (CM), rice-mustard-jute (CM), and rice-potato-jute (CM). The results of the present study revealed significant improvement in total soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), labile C or permanganate oxidizable C (KMnO<sub>4</sub>-C), soil enzymatic activities, carbon lability index (LI), carbon management index (CMI), and Soil Quality Index (SQI) in organic production systems compared to conventionally managed cropping systems. The average well colour development, utilisation of carbon substrates, Shannon-Weaver index (H), and Mcintosh (U) indices showed a significant variation among the cropping systems. Principal component analysis revealed a clear distinction between the organic and conventional production systems, suggesting that organically managed rice-jute based cropping systems have a more significant impact on microbial diversity compared to conventionally managed rice-jute based cropping systems. Furthermore, the results indicated a clear ranking of drivers, with management having a greater influence than crop rotation on soil abiotic and biotic properties, as even the rice-potato-jute system under organic management outperformed the rice-lentil-jute system under conventional practice. Among the cropping systems, rice-lentil-jute (OM) had the largest SOC, LI, CMI, Shannon-Weaver index, and Mcintosh indices, and SQI, followed by rice-mustard-jute (OM) and rice-potato-jute (OM). The present findings suggest that adopting the organically managed rice-lentil-jute system is pivotal for maintaining soil health and promoting agricultural sustainability in rice-jute based cropping systems and is highly recommended for the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145255097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On-Farm Assessment of Long-Term Impacts of Regenerative Management on Vineyard Soil Health 再生管理对葡萄园土壤健康长期影响的田间评估
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70207
Lauren Picone, Priya Verma, Corinne Butler, Kerri Steenwerth, Matthew J. Grieshop, Cristina Lazcano, Charlotte Decock

Soil health is central to sustainable agriculture and a key goal of regenerative and organic farming. However, monitoring changes in soil health remains challenging due to the lack of regionally relevant benchmarks and context-specific indicators. This study assessed the impacts of long-term and combined regenerative management practices on soil health across 87 California vineyards with diverse management histories, microclimates, and soils. Three key indicators, including aggregate stability, mineralizable carbon, and soil organic carbon, were used to develop region-specific soil health scoring functions. These were adapted from Cornell's Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Health and the Soil Health Institute frameworks. Indicator values generally trended lower than existing benchmarks, emphasizing the need for crop- and region-specific scoring systems. Results from mixed-effects models and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) indicate that long-term cover cropping (≥ 10 years) was the most consistent driver of high soil health scores, especially when combined with other practices. Livestock integration improved soil organic carbon and mineralizable carbon scores in under 10 years, showing potential to accelerate soil health benefits. Our results highlight the importance of tailoring practices to local soil and climate conditions. Findings also support the development of more flexible, regionally informed soil health frameworks.

土壤健康是可持续农业的核心,也是再生农业和有机农业的关键目标。然而,由于缺乏区域相关基准和具体情况指标,监测土壤健康变化仍然具有挑战性。本研究评估了加州87个不同管理历史、小气候和土壤的葡萄园的长期和综合再生管理实践对土壤健康的影响。三个关键指标,包括团聚体稳定性、矿化碳和土壤有机碳,用于开发特定区域的土壤健康评分函数。这些都改编自康奈尔大学土壤健康综合评估和土壤健康研究所的框架。指标值普遍低于现有基准,强调需要针对特定作物和地区的评分系统。混合效应模型和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)的结果表明,长期覆盖种植(≥10年)是高土壤健康评分最一致的驱动因素,特别是当与其他实践相结合时。畜牧业整合在不到10年的时间内改善了土壤有机碳和矿化碳得分,显示出加速土壤健康效益的潜力。我们的研究结果强调了根据当地土壤和气候条件定制实践的重要性。研究结果还支持制定更灵活、区域知情的土壤健康框架。
{"title":"On-Farm Assessment of Long-Term Impacts of Regenerative Management on Vineyard Soil Health","authors":"Lauren Picone,&nbsp;Priya Verma,&nbsp;Corinne Butler,&nbsp;Kerri Steenwerth,&nbsp;Matthew J. Grieshop,&nbsp;Cristina Lazcano,&nbsp;Charlotte Decock","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70207","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70207","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Soil health is central to sustainable agriculture and a key goal of regenerative and organic farming. However, monitoring changes in soil health remains challenging due to the lack of regionally relevant benchmarks and context-specific indicators. This study assessed the impacts of long-term and combined regenerative management practices on soil health across 87 California vineyards with diverse management histories, microclimates, and soils. Three key indicators, including aggregate stability, mineralizable carbon, and soil organic carbon, were used to develop region-specific soil health scoring functions. These were adapted from Cornell's Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Health and the Soil Health Institute frameworks. Indicator values generally trended lower than existing benchmarks, emphasizing the need for crop- and region-specific scoring systems. Results from mixed-effects models and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) indicate that long-term cover cropping (≥ 10 years) was the most consistent driver of high soil health scores, especially when combined with other practices. Livestock integration improved soil organic carbon and mineralizable carbon scores in under 10 years, showing potential to accelerate soil health benefits. Our results highlight the importance of tailoring practices to local soil and climate conditions. Findings also support the development of more flexible, regionally informed soil health frameworks.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145235376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping of Acid Sulfate Soil Types in Laihianjoki River Catchment: A Multiclass Classification 莱希安约基河流域硫酸土壤类型的多类分类
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70204
Virginia Estévez, Stefan Mattbäck, Anton Boman

Mapping of acid sulfate soils (ASS) has in the past focused mainly on ASS probability maps, which are very useful to avoid environmental damage caused by these soils. However, these maps do not indicate the ASS subtypes, which may have different environmental impacts depending on whether they are actively releasing acidity and metals (sulfuric soils) or have the potential to do so (hypersulfidic soils) if the sulfidic material within them is disturbed (oxidized). Additionally, there is a particular type of soil that is close to being classified as an ASS, but where the pH criterion is not fulfilled. This soil is referred to as para-ASS and may have a similar negative environmental impact as ASS. In the risk assessment of ASS, it is therefore crucial to know the location of ASS subtypes as well as para-ASS. In this study, we have created for the first time a multiclass map of ASS subtypes in Finland. Furthermore, four probability maps have been generated, one for each class. For this, the suitability of two machine learning methods for multiclass classification of different ASS subtypes has been evaluated. The methods are random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB), which showed very high capabilities for the classification of ASS in binary classification. RF has given the best results with F1-score values between 71% and 80% for the four classes. An accurate and realistic multiclass map of the ASS subtypes has been created using the RF model.

以往的硫酸酸性土壤制图主要集中在硫酸酸性土壤的概率图上,这对于避免硫酸酸性土壤对环境造成的破坏是非常有用的。然而,这些地图并没有显示ASS亚型,这些亚型可能会产生不同的环境影响,这取决于它们是主动释放酸性和金属(含硫土壤),还是有可能这样做(高硫化物土壤),如果其中的硫化物物质受到干扰(氧化)。此外,有一种特殊类型的土壤接近被归类为有害土壤,但其pH值不符合标准。这种土壤被称为para - ASS,可能具有与ASS相似的负面环境影响。因此,在ASS风险评估中,了解ASS亚型和para - ASS的位置至关重要。在这项研究中,我们首次在芬兰创建了ASS亚型的多类地图。此外,还生成了四个概率图,每个类一个。为此,评估了两种机器学习方法对不同ASS亚型的多类分类的适用性。随机森林(random forest, RF)和梯度增强(gradient boosting, GB)两种方法在二值分类中表现出很高的分类能力。RF给出了四个类别的最佳结果,F1得分值在71%到80%之间。使用RF模型创建了准确而真实的ASS亚型多类图。
{"title":"Mapping of Acid Sulfate Soil Types in Laihianjoki River Catchment: A Multiclass Classification","authors":"Virginia Estévez,&nbsp;Stefan Mattbäck,&nbsp;Anton Boman","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70204","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70204","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Mapping of acid sulfate soils (ASS) has in the past focused mainly on ASS probability maps, which are very useful to avoid environmental damage caused by these soils. However, these maps do not indicate the ASS subtypes, which may have different environmental impacts depending on whether they are actively releasing acidity and metals (sulfuric soils) or have the potential to do so (hypersulfidic soils) if the sulfidic material within them is disturbed (oxidized). Additionally, there is a particular type of soil that is close to being classified as an ASS, but where the pH criterion is not fulfilled. This soil is referred to as para-ASS and may have a similar negative environmental impact as ASS. In the risk assessment of ASS, it is therefore crucial to know the location of ASS subtypes as well as para-ASS. In this study, we have created for the first time a multiclass map of ASS subtypes in Finland. Furthermore, four probability maps have been generated, one for each class. For this, the suitability of two machine learning methods for multiclass classification of different ASS subtypes has been evaluated. The methods are random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB), which showed very high capabilities for the classification of ASS in binary classification. RF has given the best results with <i>F</i>1-score values between 71% and 80% for the four classes. An accurate and realistic multiclass map of the ASS subtypes has been created using the RF model.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145235417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1