Tanja Grönroos, Anne H Salonen, Tiina A Latvala, Anne Kouvonen, Annamari Lundqvist, Jukka P Kontto
Prior research on the relationship between health risk behaviours (HRBs), obesity, and gambling has primarily focused on problem gambling, while studies focusing on lower severity levels are scarce. Moreover, this relationship has rarely been analysed separately for women and men. This study aimed to investigate the association between HRBs, obesity, and the full spectrum of gambling severity in women and men. Cross-sectional population-based data from Healthy Finland Survey 2022-23 was exploited, including adults aged 20+ years (n = 28 154, response rate 46%, mean age 52 years). The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) was used as the dependent variable, both in continuous (score 0-27) and categorical (non-problem, low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gambling) form. Independent variables included HRBs (daily smoking, excessive drinking, low fruit and vegetable (F & V) consumption, low physical activity, and insufficient sleep) and obesity. Sociodemographic factors, suboptimal self-rated health, and psychological distress were adjusted for. Daily smoking, excessive drinking, low F & V consumption, and insufficient sleep were less prevalent in the non-problem gambling category (PGSI score = 0) compared to the low-risk (score 1-2), moderate-risk (score 3-7), and problem gambling (score ≥8) categories. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, all HRBs and obesity, except for physical inactivity, were significantly associated with higher PGSI scores. These findings highlight the need for public health strategies that address gambling across the entire risk spectrum. Moreover, a holistic approach that considers the individual's broader life context could strengthen both research and prevention efforts.
{"title":"Health risk behaviours, obesity, and gambling severity: findings from a nationwide population study.","authors":"Tanja Grönroos, Anne H Salonen, Tiina A Latvala, Anne Kouvonen, Annamari Lundqvist, Jukka P Kontto","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research on the relationship between health risk behaviours (HRBs), obesity, and gambling has primarily focused on problem gambling, while studies focusing on lower severity levels are scarce. Moreover, this relationship has rarely been analysed separately for women and men. This study aimed to investigate the association between HRBs, obesity, and the full spectrum of gambling severity in women and men. Cross-sectional population-based data from Healthy Finland Survey 2022-23 was exploited, including adults aged 20+ years (n = 28 154, response rate 46%, mean age 52 years). The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) was used as the dependent variable, both in continuous (score 0-27) and categorical (non-problem, low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gambling) form. Independent variables included HRBs (daily smoking, excessive drinking, low fruit and vegetable (F & V) consumption, low physical activity, and insufficient sleep) and obesity. Sociodemographic factors, suboptimal self-rated health, and psychological distress were adjusted for. Daily smoking, excessive drinking, low F & V consumption, and insufficient sleep were less prevalent in the non-problem gambling category (PGSI score = 0) compared to the low-risk (score 1-2), moderate-risk (score 3-7), and problem gambling (score ≥8) categories. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, all HRBs and obesity, except for physical inactivity, were significantly associated with higher PGSI scores. These findings highlight the need for public health strategies that address gambling across the entire risk spectrum. Moreover, a holistic approach that considers the individual's broader life context could strengthen both research and prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gilles Dussault, Tomas Zapata, James Buchan, Yanina Andersen, Yusufi Salomudin, Veronica Montebello, Erlend Tuseth, Teodor Blidaru, Dragos Nicolae, Niamh Humphries, Jonila Gabrani, Ilia Nadareishvili, Emma Ghazaryan, Radu Comsa, Rukhshona Qurbonova, Sergiu Otgon, Gazmend Bejtja, Parvina Makhmudova, Ilker Dastan, Casimiro Dias, Tomas Roubal, Sulakshana Nandi, Alba Llop-Girones, Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat
Background: The WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted 9 country studies of migration of doctors and nurses. This paper identifies similarities and variations in migratory flows, factors that influence them, and related policy responses.
Methods: The 9 countries include 4 that integrate the European Economic Area (EEA), Ireland, Malta, Norway and Romania, and 5 non-EEA, Albania, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan. Case writers used a common study template that covered international outflows and inflows, mobility push and pull factors, and related policy interventions. Data sources include the WHO/Europe-OECD- Eurostat and country databases.
Results: Emigration is motivated by low wages, dissatisfaction with working conditions, inadequate practice environment, excessive workloads and lack of opportunities for professional development. Flows for doctors and nurses vary in volume over time, and in countries of origin and destination.Pull factors include the free circulation of persons within the EEA for citizens of member states, easy access to work permits, common or easily learned language, and the presence of a diaspora in a destination country.Policies to improve retention include increasing the number of training places, making remuneration and working conditions more attractive and compulsory service. All countries have some health workforce development plan, but implementation is a challenge everywhere.
Conclusions: Policies should be tailored to country labour market conditions, migration trends, and institutional capacity. Better understanding of migration flows will improve the effectiveness of policy responses.
{"title":"Policy responses to doctor and nurse migration in the European Region: insights from nine country case-studies.","authors":"Gilles Dussault, Tomas Zapata, James Buchan, Yanina Andersen, Yusufi Salomudin, Veronica Montebello, Erlend Tuseth, Teodor Blidaru, Dragos Nicolae, Niamh Humphries, Jonila Gabrani, Ilia Nadareishvili, Emma Ghazaryan, Radu Comsa, Rukhshona Qurbonova, Sergiu Otgon, Gazmend Bejtja, Parvina Makhmudova, Ilker Dastan, Casimiro Dias, Tomas Roubal, Sulakshana Nandi, Alba Llop-Girones, Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf231","DOIUrl":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted 9 country studies of migration of doctors and nurses. This paper identifies similarities and variations in migratory flows, factors that influence them, and related policy responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 9 countries include 4 that integrate the European Economic Area (EEA), Ireland, Malta, Norway and Romania, and 5 non-EEA, Albania, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan. Case writers used a common study template that covered international outflows and inflows, mobility push and pull factors, and related policy interventions. Data sources include the WHO/Europe-OECD- Eurostat and country databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emigration is motivated by low wages, dissatisfaction with working conditions, inadequate practice environment, excessive workloads and lack of opportunities for professional development. Flows for doctors and nurses vary in volume over time, and in countries of origin and destination.Pull factors include the free circulation of persons within the EEA for citizens of member states, easy access to work permits, common or easily learned language, and the presence of a diaspora in a destination country.Policies to improve retention include increasing the number of training places, making remuneration and working conditions more attractive and compulsory service. All countries have some health workforce development plan, but implementation is a challenge everywhere.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policies should be tailored to country labour market conditions, migration trends, and institutional capacity. Better understanding of migration flows will improve the effectiveness of policy responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Health workforce shortages pose a challenge to European health systems. Challenging working conditions in healthcare were intensified by the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. In Ireland deteriorating working conditions for hospital doctors triggered a pattern of emigration and an increased dependence on international medical graduates. This paper seeks to better understand doctor emigration and its implications for Ireland's future workforce, drawing on the case of Irish doctors who emigrated to Australia.
Methods: The paper draws on three forms of data : 1) secondary data from the Australian Department of Home Affairs on visas issued to Irish citizen doctors; 2) open-ended survey responses from hospital doctors working in Ireland (2019, N = 469) and, 3) qualitative interview data from Irish doctors (2018, N = 51) in Australia. Research ethics permission was granted by the host institution.
Results: Significantly more Irish doctors were issued with Australian work visas in 2024 (624) than in 2005 (72). Hospital doctor survey respondents described how emigration decision-making was informed by poor working conditions, inadequate staffing levels, poor wellbeing and dissatisfaction with the quality of care delivered. Emigrant Irish doctors in Australia indicated that similar issues deterred their return.
Conclusions: This paper shows that Ireland has high rates of outward and inward doctor migration with retention/return not a policy priority. Our findings indicate that challenging working conditions are a driver of emigration and a deterrent to return. We call for a more person-centred approach to the medical workforce which would improve doctor working conditions, prioritise their wellbeing and promote retention/return.
{"title":"'Why wouldn't I want to go?': doctor migration, retention, return and ireland's future medical workforce.","authors":"Niamh Humphries, John-Paul Byrne","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health workforce shortages pose a challenge to European health systems. Challenging working conditions in healthcare were intensified by the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. In Ireland deteriorating working conditions for hospital doctors triggered a pattern of emigration and an increased dependence on international medical graduates. This paper seeks to better understand doctor emigration and its implications for Ireland's future workforce, drawing on the case of Irish doctors who emigrated to Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The paper draws on three forms of data : 1) secondary data from the Australian Department of Home Affairs on visas issued to Irish citizen doctors; 2) open-ended survey responses from hospital doctors working in Ireland (2019, N = 469) and, 3) qualitative interview data from Irish doctors (2018, N = 51) in Australia. Research ethics permission was granted by the host institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly more Irish doctors were issued with Australian work visas in 2024 (624) than in 2005 (72). Hospital doctor survey respondents described how emigration decision-making was informed by poor working conditions, inadequate staffing levels, poor wellbeing and dissatisfaction with the quality of care delivered. Emigrant Irish doctors in Australia indicated that similar issues deterred their return.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper shows that Ireland has high rates of outward and inward doctor migration with retention/return not a policy priority. Our findings indicate that challenging working conditions are a driver of emigration and a deterrent to return. We call for a more person-centred approach to the medical workforce which would improve doctor working conditions, prioritise their wellbeing and promote retention/return.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mónica Morgado, André Beja, Rita Morais, Tiago Correia
Background: Nurse retention is a critical challenge across Europe, directly affecting workforce sustainability, quality of care, and health systems resilience. Despite persistent shortages and increasing emigration, evidence on nurse retention determinants within the Portuguese National Health Service (NHS) remains limited. This study aims to identify factors influencing nurses' intention to stay in the NHS, contributing to national and European debates on sustainable workforce strategies.
Methods: A quantitative, observational, cross-sectional survey was conducted among a representative sample of 1 494 nurses working in NHS. A validated questionnaire was developed using a Nominal Group Technique and Delphi Panel with stakeholders, to measure job satisfaction with Likert scales. Inferential statistical analyses, including t-tests and multiple linear regression, examined associations between intention to stay and factors such as job satisfaction, work-life balance, career development opportunities, remuneration, and sociodemographic characteristics.
Results: Fixed work schedules, overall job satisfaction, age, satisfaction with work-life balance, and career development emerged as significant predictors of intention to stay. Satisfaction with salary and financial incentives, while low, was not statistically significant. Findings highlight the importance of integrated workforce retention strategies combining organisational improvements, career progression pathways, and work-life balance policies. These findings differ from those observed among physicians in parallel research, confirming the need for profession-specific retention approaches.
Conclusion: This study provides new evidence on nurse retention in Portugal, reinforcing the need for human resources policies aligned with European Union priorities on workforce sustainability. Cross-country policy learning and evidence-informed, context-sensitive strategies are crucial for supporting nurse retention and health system resilience.
{"title":"Retention of nurses in the Portuguese NHS: Organisational, career, and work-life balance factors shaping intention to stay.","authors":"Mónica Morgado, André Beja, Rita Morais, Tiago Correia","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurse retention is a critical challenge across Europe, directly affecting workforce sustainability, quality of care, and health systems resilience. Despite persistent shortages and increasing emigration, evidence on nurse retention determinants within the Portuguese National Health Service (NHS) remains limited. This study aims to identify factors influencing nurses' intention to stay in the NHS, contributing to national and European debates on sustainable workforce strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative, observational, cross-sectional survey was conducted among a representative sample of 1 494 nurses working in NHS. A validated questionnaire was developed using a Nominal Group Technique and Delphi Panel with stakeholders, to measure job satisfaction with Likert scales. Inferential statistical analyses, including t-tests and multiple linear regression, examined associations between intention to stay and factors such as job satisfaction, work-life balance, career development opportunities, remuneration, and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fixed work schedules, overall job satisfaction, age, satisfaction with work-life balance, and career development emerged as significant predictors of intention to stay. Satisfaction with salary and financial incentives, while low, was not statistically significant. Findings highlight the importance of integrated workforce retention strategies combining organisational improvements, career progression pathways, and work-life balance policies. These findings differ from those observed among physicians in parallel research, confirming the need for profession-specific retention approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides new evidence on nurse retention in Portugal, reinforcing the need for human resources policies aligned with European Union priorities on workforce sustainability. Cross-country policy learning and evidence-informed, context-sensitive strategies are crucial for supporting nurse retention and health system resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Moral Injury is an emerging concept initially studied in the military context, capturing the profound psychological, emotional, and spiritual suffering experienced by individuals who perceive that they have transgressed their deeply held moral or ethical beliefs. In healthcare, Moral Injury occurs when systemic constraints, organizational policies, or professional commitments force healthcare workers (HCWs) to act in ways that dissent from their values. Our study aimed to explore qualitatively the phenomenon of Moral Injury among physicians in healthcare settings in Romania and the Republic of Moldova, focusing on how systemic and organizational factors contribute to their experiences.
Methods: The study employed a qualitative research design. We collected and analysed 17 interviews with doctors from Romania and Republic of Moldova.
Results: We identified four central themes and subsequent sub-themes: Perception and Understanding of Moral Injury; Factors contributing to Moral Injury; Impact on Patient Safety and Quality of Care; Coping Strategies and Emotional Survival Mechanisms.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Moral Injury is not the result of isolated events but rather the outcome of persistent exposure to systemic dysfunctions, including coercive hierarchies, politicized leadership, inadequate resources, and the prioritization of economic performance over patient welfare. Physicians described feelings of shame and betrayal when compelled to comply with orders that contradicted their professional ethics.
{"title":"Exploring Moral Injury among physicians in the Republic of Moldova and Romania: A qualitative study.","authors":"Irina Papuc, Marius Ionuț Ungureanu","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moral Injury is an emerging concept initially studied in the military context, capturing the profound psychological, emotional, and spiritual suffering experienced by individuals who perceive that they have transgressed their deeply held moral or ethical beliefs. In healthcare, Moral Injury occurs when systemic constraints, organizational policies, or professional commitments force healthcare workers (HCWs) to act in ways that dissent from their values. Our study aimed to explore qualitatively the phenomenon of Moral Injury among physicians in healthcare settings in Romania and the Republic of Moldova, focusing on how systemic and organizational factors contribute to their experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a qualitative research design. We collected and analysed 17 interviews with doctors from Romania and Republic of Moldova.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four central themes and subsequent sub-themes: Perception and Understanding of Moral Injury; Factors contributing to Moral Injury; Impact on Patient Safety and Quality of Care; Coping Strategies and Emotional Survival Mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that Moral Injury is not the result of isolated events but rather the outcome of persistent exposure to systemic dysfunctions, including coercive hierarchies, politicized leadership, inadequate resources, and the prioritization of economic performance over patient welfare. Physicians described feelings of shame and betrayal when compelled to comply with orders that contradicted their professional ethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Waiting times for health care is a significant health policy concern across many health systems, which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Long waiting times for non-emergency care generate health losses to patients because health benefits are postponed. They can increase the risk of mortality or morbidity and reduce patient ability to benefit from health care. Waiting times can also generate negative spill-over effects on labour market outcomes. For individuals in the working age, employed individuals might end up on sick leave and claim sickness benefits, or experience reduced productivity if they continue to work. Individuals looking for a job may find it harder to find employment or become economically inactive. We conduct a narrative review of the literature on the effect of waiting times on health losses and labour market outcomes. There is growing literature documenting the effect of longer waiting times on labour market outcomes. Although limited, the literature identifies potentially harmful effects in particular when patients are waiting for mental health services and orthopaedic treatment. The findings have implications for prioritization of patients on the list and for allocation of resources within the health sector and across sectors.
{"title":"Waiting times for health services, health, and labour market outcomes.","authors":"Luigi Siciliani","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Waiting times for health care is a significant health policy concern across many health systems, which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Long waiting times for non-emergency care generate health losses to patients because health benefits are postponed. They can increase the risk of mortality or morbidity and reduce patient ability to benefit from health care. Waiting times can also generate negative spill-over effects on labour market outcomes. For individuals in the working age, employed individuals might end up on sick leave and claim sickness benefits, or experience reduced productivity if they continue to work. Individuals looking for a job may find it harder to find employment or become economically inactive. We conduct a narrative review of the literature on the effect of waiting times on health losses and labour market outcomes. There is growing literature documenting the effect of longer waiting times on labour market outcomes. Although limited, the literature identifies potentially harmful effects in particular when patients are waiting for mental health services and orthopaedic treatment. The findings have implications for prioritization of patients on the list and for allocation of resources within the health sector and across sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145654156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marja Palomäki, Miika Linna, Ulla Anttalainen, Terhi Kolari, Markku Partinen, Tarja Saaresranta, Jaana Keto
There is limited information on changes over time in the incidence, age, sex, and comorbidities of obstructive sleep apnoea. We extracted data from the Finnish Secondary Care Register to assess the incidence of obstructive sleep apnoea, the age and sex distribution, and the prevalence of 26 comorbidities of incident obstructive sleep apnoea patients in Finnish specialized care in 2010 and 2020. Analyses were conducted for three age groups (18 - 39, 40 - 64, and ≥65 years), stratified by sex, and for the total population. From 2010 to 2020, the incidence of clinically diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea increased from 1.7 to 6.1 per 1000 (from 2.4 to 7.6 per 1000 for men and from 1.0 to 4.6 per 1000 for women). The proportion of the youngest group increased from 11.0% to 12.7% and the oldest group from 20.2% to 27.2%. The largest increase in incidence was observed in the youngest group for both sexes. Among men, the prevalence of six comorbidities decreased, and of eight increased. Among women, the prevalence of seven comorbidities decreased, and of four increased. Obstructive sleep apnoea is being diagnosed increasingly in young adults and those aged 65 years and older. Changes in comorbidities suggest increased recognition and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and, on the other hand, the ageing of the population. A decrease in some comorbidities suggests that incident obstructive sleep apnoea patients are less morbid despite their increased age.
{"title":"A decade of change in age, sex distribution, and comorbidities of obstructive sleep apnoea in Finland.","authors":"Marja Palomäki, Miika Linna, Ulla Anttalainen, Terhi Kolari, Markku Partinen, Tarja Saaresranta, Jaana Keto","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is limited information on changes over time in the incidence, age, sex, and comorbidities of obstructive sleep apnoea. We extracted data from the Finnish Secondary Care Register to assess the incidence of obstructive sleep apnoea, the age and sex distribution, and the prevalence of 26 comorbidities of incident obstructive sleep apnoea patients in Finnish specialized care in 2010 and 2020. Analyses were conducted for three age groups (18 - 39, 40 - 64, and ≥65 years), stratified by sex, and for the total population. From 2010 to 2020, the incidence of clinically diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea increased from 1.7 to 6.1 per 1000 (from 2.4 to 7.6 per 1000 for men and from 1.0 to 4.6 per 1000 for women). The proportion of the youngest group increased from 11.0% to 12.7% and the oldest group from 20.2% to 27.2%. The largest increase in incidence was observed in the youngest group for both sexes. Among men, the prevalence of six comorbidities decreased, and of eight increased. Among women, the prevalence of seven comorbidities decreased, and of four increased. Obstructive sleep apnoea is being diagnosed increasingly in young adults and those aged 65 years and older. Changes in comorbidities suggest increased recognition and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and, on the other hand, the ageing of the population. A decrease in some comorbidities suggests that incident obstructive sleep apnoea patients are less morbid despite their increased age.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carla Guerra-Tort, Ana Teijeiro, María Isolina Santiago-Pérez, Guadalupe García, Lucía Martín-Gisbert, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Mónica Pérez-Ríos
To describe the pattern of contacts with the healthcare system associated with drug use in Spain in the years 2022 and 2023. For the period 2016-23, data derived from a registry of activity in specialized care, included in the clinical-administrative database of Spanish hospitals (Registro de Atención Especializada-Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos), were extracted. Contacts with the healthcare system associated with alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, morphine derivatives, and sedative-hypnotics use were analyzed. The methodology of endemic corridors was applied for each drug category based on data from 2016-21. The series of contacts in 2022 and 2023 were then represented in the corridors to compare their expected and observed pattern. A total of 193 433 contacts associated with the use of alcohol (90 735), cannabis (39 730), cocaine (23 485), morphine derivatives (4888), and sedative-hypnotics (34 595) were analyzed for the period 2016-23. Of the contacts, 70.3% corresponded to men and 23.4% corresponded to people aged 45-54. The number of contacts increased for all categories of drugs in 2022 and 2023. This increase was reflected in the corridors, where contacts were mainly located in alert zones, and sometimes in epidemic zones. The results of this study show that endemic corridors allow the surveillance of the pattern of contacts with the healthcare system associated with drug use and, indirectly, of drug use itself. This methodology should be further studied as a complement in epidemiological surveillance of addictive behaviors at a population level.
描述2022年和2023年西班牙与药物使用相关的医疗保健系统接触模式。在2016-23年期间,提取了西班牙医院临床管理数据库(Registro de Atención Especializada-Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos)中包含的专业护理活动登记处的数据。分析了与酒精、大麻、可卡因、吗啡衍生物和镇静催眠药使用相关的卫生保健系统接触。基于2016-21年的数据,对每个药物类别采用流行走廊方法。然后在走廊中表示2022年和2023年的一系列接触,以比较其预期和观察到的模式。2016-23年期间,共分析了与使用酒精(90 735)、大麻(39 730)、可卡因(23 485)、吗啡衍生物(4888)和镇静催眠药(34 595)相关的193 433名接触者。在这些接触者中,70.3%是男性,23.4%是45-54岁的人。2022年和2023年,所有类别药物的接触次数都有所增加。这一增加反映在走廊上,接触者主要位于警戒区,有时在流行区。这项研究的结果表明,流行病走廊可以监测与吸毒有关的卫生保健系统接触的模式,并间接监测吸毒本身。应进一步研究这种方法,作为在人口水平上对成瘾行为进行流行病学监测的补充。
{"title":"The novel use of endemic corridors for addictive behavior surveillance in Spain.","authors":"Carla Guerra-Tort, Ana Teijeiro, María Isolina Santiago-Pérez, Guadalupe García, Lucía Martín-Gisbert, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Mónica Pérez-Ríos","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To describe the pattern of contacts with the healthcare system associated with drug use in Spain in the years 2022 and 2023. For the period 2016-23, data derived from a registry of activity in specialized care, included in the clinical-administrative database of Spanish hospitals (Registro de Atención Especializada-Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos), were extracted. Contacts with the healthcare system associated with alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, morphine derivatives, and sedative-hypnotics use were analyzed. The methodology of endemic corridors was applied for each drug category based on data from 2016-21. The series of contacts in 2022 and 2023 were then represented in the corridors to compare their expected and observed pattern. A total of 193 433 contacts associated with the use of alcohol (90 735), cannabis (39 730), cocaine (23 485), morphine derivatives (4888), and sedative-hypnotics (34 595) were analyzed for the period 2016-23. Of the contacts, 70.3% corresponded to men and 23.4% corresponded to people aged 45-54. The number of contacts increased for all categories of drugs in 2022 and 2023. This increase was reflected in the corridors, where contacts were mainly located in alert zones, and sometimes in epidemic zones. The results of this study show that endemic corridors allow the surveillance of the pattern of contacts with the healthcare system associated with drug use and, indirectly, of drug use itself. This methodology should be further studied as a complement in epidemiological surveillance of addictive behaviors at a population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hege Breivik, Ingeborg Forthun, Ann K S Knudsen, Lode van der Velde, Carl M Baravelli
Understanding local level impact of socio-economic and spatial disparities on health outcomes is crucial for informing effective public health interventions. This study examines the association between socio-economic factors, centrality, and premature mortality-measured as years of life lost (YLLs)-across Norwegian municipalities. We conducted an ecological, cross-sectional registry-based study across municipalities and districts, each with populations exceeding 1000 as of 1 January 2019. Data on mortality, demographics, education, income, and centrality were sourced from Statistics Norway. All-cause YLLs were calculated by multiplying age-specific mortality numbers by aspirational life expectancy from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 life tables. Municipalities were divided into quartiles based on a composite socio-economic position (SEP) score that integrated education and income, and grouped into centrality categories. Mixed-effects negative binomial regression models, crude and adjusted for age categories and sex, evaluated both relative and absolute associations. The lowest SEP quartile, assessed with a composite SEP score, had a 15% higher YLL rate compared to the highest quartile [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07-1.24], amounting to an absolute difference of 2127 YLLs per 100 000 population. Similarly, the least central quartile exhibited a 15% higher YLL rate compared to the most central one (IRR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.09-1.21), translating to an absolute difference of 2057 YLLs per 100 000 population. There are substantial inequalities in premature mortality across Norwegian municipalities, strongly linked to municipal SEP and centrality.
{"title":"Geographical and socio-economic inequalities in years of life lost across Norwegian municipalities and city districts in 2019: an ecological registry-based study.","authors":"Hege Breivik, Ingeborg Forthun, Ann K S Knudsen, Lode van der Velde, Carl M Baravelli","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf086","DOIUrl":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding local level impact of socio-economic and spatial disparities on health outcomes is crucial for informing effective public health interventions. This study examines the association between socio-economic factors, centrality, and premature mortality-measured as years of life lost (YLLs)-across Norwegian municipalities. We conducted an ecological, cross-sectional registry-based study across municipalities and districts, each with populations exceeding 1000 as of 1 January 2019. Data on mortality, demographics, education, income, and centrality were sourced from Statistics Norway. All-cause YLLs were calculated by multiplying age-specific mortality numbers by aspirational life expectancy from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 life tables. Municipalities were divided into quartiles based on a composite socio-economic position (SEP) score that integrated education and income, and grouped into centrality categories. Mixed-effects negative binomial regression models, crude and adjusted for age categories and sex, evaluated both relative and absolute associations. The lowest SEP quartile, assessed with a composite SEP score, had a 15% higher YLL rate compared to the highest quartile [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07-1.24], amounting to an absolute difference of 2127 YLLs per 100 000 population. Similarly, the least central quartile exhibited a 15% higher YLL rate compared to the most central one (IRR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.09-1.21), translating to an absolute difference of 2057 YLLs per 100 000 population. There are substantial inequalities in premature mortality across Norwegian municipalities, strongly linked to municipal SEP and centrality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"1100-1106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707486/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145091466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Every year, a significant number of people in Finland retire on a disability pension. Half of them are granted a temporary disability pension. Our study examines the different pathways into and out of temporary disability retirement and analyses how individual-level factors are associated with these pathways. We used comprehensive register data on Finns aged 30-58 who received a temporary disability pension in 2018 and followed them for 4 years before and after their pension claim. Sequence analysis in combination with clustering was used to identify typical patterns in and out of temporary disability pension. In addition, we examined the association between individual-level factors and the observed pathways. We identified nine distinct clusters with unique pathways. Two-thirds of the study population belonged to five clusters in which receipt of a disability pension continued for several years. The majority had been employed before receiving the pension. Only 18% belonged to a single cluster characterized by return to work, while persons in the remaining three clusters (20%) ended up in unemployment or unknown labour market states. The different pathways also differed by individual-level factors. We identified several different pathways into and out of temporary disability pensions. Most of them were characterized by long-term disability retirement rather than return to work. A better understanding of these pathways and associated individual factors is crucial to developing more effective strategies to facilitate return to work and prevent long-term disability.
{"title":"Pathways into and out of temporary disability retirement: an 8-year sequence analysis study in Finland.","authors":"Anu Polvinen, Aart-Jan Riekhoff, Riku Perhoniemi","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf183","DOIUrl":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Every year, a significant number of people in Finland retire on a disability pension. Half of them are granted a temporary disability pension. Our study examines the different pathways into and out of temporary disability retirement and analyses how individual-level factors are associated with these pathways. We used comprehensive register data on Finns aged 30-58 who received a temporary disability pension in 2018 and followed them for 4 years before and after their pension claim. Sequence analysis in combination with clustering was used to identify typical patterns in and out of temporary disability pension. In addition, we examined the association between individual-level factors and the observed pathways. We identified nine distinct clusters with unique pathways. Two-thirds of the study population belonged to five clusters in which receipt of a disability pension continued for several years. The majority had been employed before receiving the pension. Only 18% belonged to a single cluster characterized by return to work, while persons in the remaining three clusters (20%) ended up in unemployment or unknown labour market states. The different pathways also differed by individual-level factors. We identified several different pathways into and out of temporary disability pensions. Most of them were characterized by long-term disability retirement rather than return to work. A better understanding of these pathways and associated individual factors is crucial to developing more effective strategies to facilitate return to work and prevent long-term disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"1143-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707508/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145274280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}