Allergy最新文献

Background: Noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are currently lacking. This study evaluates 20 biomarkers in serum and saliva, aiming to assess their diagnostic potential in pediatric EoE patients and healthy individuals.

Methods: Blood and saliva from children undergoing upper endoscopy were analyzed for biomarkers, including absolute eosinophil count (AEC), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), total and specific IgG₄-antibodies (sIgG₄), specific IgE-antibodies (sIgE) and 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15(S)-HETE). Some patients participated twice, forming a longitudinal cohort. The ability to use the biomarkers to predict the EoE diagnosis was evaluated.

Results: Analysis from 105 children divided into active EoE, remission, and healthy, revealed elevated levels of serum biomarkers (AEC, EDN, 15(S)-HETE, sIgG₄, and sIgE) in active EoE compared to healthy individuals. A combination of biomarkers (AEC, EDN, sIgE to egg white and wheat) and symptoms showed an AUC of 0.92 in distinguishing between the three groups. We further showed that optimal cutoff values for these biomarkers could discriminate between active EoE and healthy with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 100% in distinguishing EoE (active and in remission) from healthy. Longitudinally, levels of EDN, sIgG₄ to Bos d 4, Bos d 5, Bos d 8, gliadin, and birch, and sIgE to milk decreased in patients progressing from active EoE to remission (p <.05).

Conclusions: This study identified novel biomarkers associated with EoE and proposes a panel, together with symptoms, for effective discrimination between active EoE, EoE in remission, and healthy individuals. The findings may contribute to a less invasive diagnostic method and may be a potential surveillance tool for pediatric EoE patients.

Background: The airway microbiome in severe asthma has not been characterised at species-level by metagenomic sequencing, nor have the relationships between specific species and mucosal immune responses in 'type-2 low', neutrophilic asthma been defined. We performed an integrated species-level metagenomic data with inflammatory mediators to characterise prevalence of dominant potentially pathogenic organisms and host immune responses.

Methods: Sputum and nasal lavage samples were analysed using long-read metagenomic sequencing with Nanopore and qPCR in two cross-sectional adult severe asthma cohorts, Wessex (n = 66) and Oxford (n = 30). We integrated species-level data with clinical parameters and 39 selected airway proteins measured by immunoassay and O-link.

Results: The sputum microbiome in health and mild asthma displayed comparable microbial diversity. By contrast, 23% (19/81) of severe asthma microbiomes were dominated by a single respiratory pathogen, namely H. influenzae (n = 10), M. catarrhalis (n = 4), S. pneumoniae (n = 4) and P. aeruginosa (n = 1). Neutrophilic asthma was associated with H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae and T. whipplei with elevated type-1 cytokines and proteases; eosinophilic asthma with higher M. catarrhalis, but lower H. influenzae, and S. pneumoniae abundance. H. influenzae load correlated with Eosinophil Cationic Protein, elastase and IL-10. R. mucilaginosa associated positively with IL-6 and negatively with FGF. Bayesian network analysis also revealed close and distinct relationships of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis with type-1 airway inflammation. The microbiomes and cytokine milieu were distinct between upper and lower airways.

Conclusions: This species-level integrated analysis reveals central, but distinct associations between potentially pathogenic bacteria and airways inflammation in severe asthma.

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, nonscarring hair-loss disorder associated with significant quality-of-life impairment and limited treatment options. AA has been recently linked to atopy and shown to exhibit both Th1- and Th2-driven inflammation. However, a comprehensive molecular and cellular characterization across blood and scalp compartments in both atopic and nonatopic patients is lacking.

Methods: Lesional and nonlesional scalp biopsies obtained from AA patients with (n = 16) or without (n = 20) atopic history, and 17 demographically matched healthy controls were analyzed with RNA-seq, RT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry was also performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a subset of patients. Differential expression was defined using |fold-change| > 1.5 and false-discovery rate <0.05.

Results: AA scalp exhibited robust upregulation of Th1- (IFNG, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11) and Th2-related products (CCL26, CCR4, IL10, IL13, TSLP, TNFRSF4/OX40) and shared downregulation of hair keratins, regardless of atopic background, with variable Th17/Th22 modulation. AA patients with atopy exhibited greater inflammatory tone and Th2-skewing (IL10, IL13, IL33, CCR4, CCL26). Disease severity correlated significantly with immune and hair keratin biomarkers and with perifollicular cellular infiltrates. Cutaneous OX40/OX40L upregulation was paralleled by increases in circulating OX40⁺ and OX40L⁺ leukocytes, regardless of atopic background.

Conclusion: Our results suggest some atopy-associated immune differences in AA and highlight the OX40 axis as a potential novel therapeutic target that may broadly benefit AA patients.

Background: Eosinophils are key therapeutic targets in severe asthma that are suppressed by IL5 (mepolizumab) and IL5 receptor (benralizumab) blockade. The effect of IL5 pathway biologics on recently described homeostatic (hEOs) and inflammatory (iEOs) eosinophil subsets is unknown. We aimed to determine the relative impact of mepolizumab and benralizumab treatment on eosinophil subset and phenotype, and explore clinical associations of eosinophil subsets with severe asthma characteristics and treatment response.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional observational study of severe asthma (eosinophilic n = 32, non-eosinophilic n = 23, mepolizumab-treated n = 25), with longitudinal follow-up of 30 eosinophilic participants at two timepoints (4-24 weeks, >24 weeks) post-commencement of mepolizumab (n = 20) or benralizumab (n = 10). Blood hEOs and iEOs were measured by flow cytometry assessment of surface CD62L protein.

Results: iEO proportion was significantly lower in mepolizumab-treated participants in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Mepolizumab and benralizumab depleted iEOs to a similar extent, however a significantly greater number of hEOs remained in mepolizumab participants at follow-up. Greater iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in eosinophilic but not non-eosinophilic asthma. Higher residual iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in mepolizumab-treated individuals. Reduced blood eosinophil viability was observed in around half of mepolizumab-treated participants, which was associated with significantly better asthma control and spirometry.

Conclusions: Mepolizumab depletes iEOs and reduces circulating eosinophil viability in severe asthma but preserves a residual population of circulatory hEOs. In contrast benralizumab depleted both iEOs and hEOs. Higher iEO abundance and eosinophil viability are associated with poorer clinical outcomes following mepolizumab-treatment. Monitoring circulating eosinophil phenotype and viability may be useful to predict biologic treatment response in severe asthma.

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory condition affecting the nose and paranasal sinuses, posing a significant socio-economic impact with substantial challenges in management. Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation such as dupilumab, have emerged as promising options. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by comprehensively evaluating the 3-year impact of sustained dupilumab therapy in CRSwNP.

Methods: A multicentric, retrospective collection of real-world data from five tertiary referral centers in Germany was conducted, enrolling 150 adult patients. The study investigated patient-reported outcomes, disease-specific indices and clinical measures, focusing on therapeutic response persistence, adverse events, and factors influencing treatment continuity.

Results: Results indicate significant improvements in clinical parameters from baseline (n = 150) with sustained effectiveness after 36 months (n = 138) as indicated in mean score ± standard deviation. Dupilumab treatment significantly improved overall disease-related impairment (VAS score: 7.5 ± 2.5 to 1.6 ± 1.3) and rhinosinusitis symptoms (SNOT-22: 59.4 ± 19.4 to 18.0 ± 15.0). Nasal Polyp Scores (NPS) decreased (5.3 ± 1.8 to 0.7 ± 1.1), and olfactory function improved (3.2 ± 2.5 to 8.4 ± 2.8), with three out of four patients achieving normosmia or hyposmia after 36 months. An "Excellent" treatment response according to EUFOREA23 criteria was observed in 76.5% of patients after 36 months. Sixteen patients discontinued Dupilumab, 12 permanently. Adverse events totaled 69 in 48 patients, commonly self-limiting.

Conclusion: The study highlights the enduring effectiveness and lack of habituation to dupilumab after a sustained therapy of 3 years, providing valuable insights into its long-term therapeutic implications for CRSwNP patients.