European Spine Journal最新文献

Introduction: Children with cervical or cervicothoracic congenital scoliosis are limited in their ability to compensate for the main curve of the deformity because there are only a few mobile segments in their cervical spine. Over the years, we have frequently observed coronal atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) in a lateral direction (from left to right or vice versa) in these patients. It was anticipated that CAAD might compensate for the horizontal position of the head, and it is hypothesized that CAAD depends on the degree of scoliotic deformity. Thus, the aim of our study was to investigate whether there is a correlation between CAAD and scoliosis parameters in these patients.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed based on CAT scans and preoperative X-rays of patients with cervical and cervicothoracic scoliosis with an apex between C4 and T6. Seventeen patients, with a mean age of 7.25 years, who were 9 girls and 8 boys, and who were treated between 2006 and 2022 were included. Cobb`s angle of the main curve (CA-MC), Cobb`s angle of the secondary curve (CA-SC), and T1-, C2- and UEV (upper end vertebra) tilt were measured on whole-spine radiographs in the standing position. The CAAD was measured via coronal CAT scan reconstruction and defined as the difference in the distances of the lateral masses to the midline of the axis. Pearson`s linear correlation coefficients (r) were determined using SPSS to evaluate correlations between CAAD and the measured parameters. p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results: CAAD toward the convex region in patients with scoliosis was typically observed; the mean CAAD was 3 mm ± 3.7 mm. The mean CA-MC was 46° ± 13°, the mean CA-SC was 16° ± 9.6°, the mean T1 tilt was 17° ± 8.8°, the mean C2 tilt was 9°± 8.8°, and the mean UEV tilt was 24° ± 7.2°. There was a strong linear correlation between CAAD and CA-MC (r = 0.784, p < 0.001), C2 tilt (r = 0.745; p < 0.001), and UEV tilt (r = 0.519; p = 0.033). There was no correlation between CAAD and either CA-SC or T1 tilt.

Discussion: Children with cervical or cervicothoracic scoliosis tend to have a CAAD toward the convexity of the scoliosis that correlates to CA-MC, C2-tilt, and UEV-tilt. CAAD may be seen as a compensatory mechanism to keep the head in a horizontal position. Severe or progressive CAAD may result in destruction of the atlantoaxial joint, including severe complaints, thus necessitating close follow-up and possibly early surgical treatment. Moreover, CAAD might be a useful additional radiographic parameter to be checked in future scoliosis studies.

Purpose: Major spinal surgery causes severe pain. We examined the ability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) to alleviate pain after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in paediatric scoliosis patients.

Methods: Seventy-two patients who underwent PSF were randomized into a preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB group or a no-block control group. The composite primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the first 24 h after surgery and the number of parent-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) boluses administered 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the NRS score, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and quality of recovery.

Results: The AUC-NRS at rest was 62 (13) in the ESPB group and 89 (13) in the control group (P < 0.001). There were 15 (5) 24-h PCIA boluses administered in the ESPB group and 30 (7) in the control group (P < 0.001). Compared with those in the control group, the NRS scores at rest were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, and 9 h postoperatively, and the NRS scores during movement were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h postoperatively. The ESPB group showed a lower need for PCIA than did the control group at 0-6, 6-12, 12-18 and 1-24 h postoperatively. In the ESPB group, fewer patients required rescue analgesics, and patients exhibited a higher quality of recovery.

Conclusion: Preoperative ESPB improves postoperative analgesia in paediatric scoliosis patients who underwent PSF.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300074505.

Date of registration: August 8, 2023.

Purpose: Spinal and lower extremity degeneration often causes pain and disability. Lower extremity osteoarthritis, eventually leading to total knee- (TKA) and -hip arthroplasty (THA), can alter posture through compensatory mechanisms, potentially causing spinal misalignment and paraspinal muscle (PM) atrophy. This study aims to evaluate the association between prior THA or TKA and PM-degeneration in patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions was conducted. Patients were categorized based on prior THA, TKA, or both. Quantitative analysis of functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) and fat infiltration (FI) of psoas, multifidus (MF), and erector spinae (ES) muscles at L4-level was performed using T2-weighted MRI images. The association between the FI and fCSA of the PM and prior arthroplasty was investigated. Differences were assessed using ANOVA and multivariable linear regression.

Results: Overall, 584 patients (60% female, 64 ± 12 years) were included. 66 patients (11%) had prior TKA, 36 patients (6%) THA, and 15 patients (3%) both TKA and THA. Patients with arthroplasty were mostly female (57%) and notably older (p < 0.001). The FI of the MF and the ES was significantly higher in the arthroplasty-group (both p < 0.001). Patients with prior TKA showed significantly higher FI (Est = 4.3%, p = 0.013) and lower fCSA (Est=-0.9 cm², p = 0.012) in the MF compared to the non-arthroplasty-group.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a significant lower fCSA and higher FI in the MF among individuals with prior TKA. This highlights the complex knee-spine relationship and how these structures interact with each other.

Purpose: To determine whether postoperative neck pain in the first 4 weeks following multi-level posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with orthosis is equivalent to multi-level PCF without orthosis.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to postoperative orthosis (CO) for 6 weeks or no orthosis (NO). Randomization was stratified by indication (traumatic vs. degenerative), and preoperative opioid use. A model of longitudinal regression for repeated measures was used. The two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to test equivalence. If the CI lay between the pre-determined margin of equivalence (-2.0 to + 2.0 pain score) the two groups were considered equivalent. A multiple imputation procedure was used to replace missing data.

Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in each group. At baseline, the CO group had more neck pain (5.3 vs. 3.2, p = 0.013). The Four week post-operative neck pain intensity score was 4.6 ± 0.3 for the CO group vs. 4.9 ± 0.3 for the NO group. The 95% confidence interval (-1.2 to 0.6) was within the pre-determined equivalence margin. Neck Disability Index, quality-of-life scores, and arm pain were similar. Eleven patients in the CO group and 12 patients in the NO group had an adverse event. The CO group had reduced range of motion at 6 weeks.

Conclusion: Pain scores over the first 4 weeks after surgery were equivalent for patients undergoing multi-level PCF treated with or without a cervical orthosis. Our findings do not support the routine use of a postoperative cervical orthosis for postoperative pain control. Clinical Trials Registration Number NCT04308122, April 22, 2020.

Introduction: SH is considered to be the most common benign tumor within the human spine. 1-2% of SH get symptomatic with back pain in most cases. Less often, ingrowth of vessels into the spinal canal is seen. In these cases, more invasive surgical treatment is required. Recurrence of SH following surgical treatment is a very rare condition.

Methods: We present the results of a retrospective chart review, with description of the clinical course of 12 patients with spinal canal invading SH without recurrence and of 5 patients with a recurrent SH.

Results: Recurrence was diagnosed 70 months (mean value) after the first procedure. All patients with a recurrent SH had received an incomplete tumor resection as a first treatment. The distribution of gender, age at the diagnosis, levels involved by the tumor, and initial symptoms were comparable in the group of patients with and without recurrence. The patients with recurrent SH were treated with preoperative embolization and en bloc resection or complete piecemeal resection of the affected vertebra. For stabilization, a combined, circumferential fixation was used consisting in a TSM cage filled by bone graft and posterior pedicle screw rod instrumentation in all patients. We followed these patients until 09/ 2023, mean FU 122 months (range 72-184 months). At this time, we found no evidence of tumor recurrence, good clinical conditions in all patients, no signs of implant failure or pseudarthrosis.

Discussion: Thus, radical excision, sufficient stabilization and fusion is considered to be an adequate treatment concept for recurrent SH.

Purpose: This study aims to elucidate the association between MRI measurements of spine alterations and self-reported outcomes of pain and disability in individuals with non-specific low back pain, using a comprehensive perspective based on machine learning algorithm.

Methods: 246 consecutive subjects were assessed. Pain severity in cervical, lumbar, and leg regions was determined using visual analogue scale, and functional disability was acquired by Oswestry Disability Index. Sagittal and axial MRI scans of the thoracolumbar spine were evaluated. Severity of disc degeneration, spinal canal stenosis, and presence of vertebral endplate lesions based on two different classification schemes involving the extent and the shape of defects were quantified at the levels from T12L1 to L5S1. The following parameters describing the lumbar region as a whole were calculated: maximum value along spinal levels, sum of values along levels, number of levels characterized by severe condition. The association with pain and disability was assessed by generalized multiple linear regression modelling.

Results: Disc degeneration was identified as a predictor of disability and partially of pain, whereas canal stenosis was found associated with changes in pain in the leg region. Partial correlation values ranged from 0.11 to 0.32. Endplate lesions did not show significant associations.

Conclusion: A partial association between MRI measurements and self-reported outcomes of pain and disability was confirmed. Disc degeneration was the most correlated with the reported indexes, while canal stenosis mainly affected the pain levels in the leg region. The presence of endplate lesions did not demonstrate any significant relationships.

Background: Far lateral (extraforaminal) disc herniations comprise approximately 10% of symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. They represent operative challenges due to accessibility and surgical unfamiliarity. Surgical strategies in the past have included open discectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Tubular microdiscectomies have gained traction due to their minimally invasive advantages, including reduced morbidity, pain and length of hospital stay.

Methods: We report our retrospective single institution consecutive case series of tubular far lateral microdiscectomies. One hundred and seventy-six patients were operated on over an eight-year period. Clinical outcomes were assessed after institutional ethics approval. We additionally describe our surgical technique with an illustrative video case.

Results: Over a mean follow-up of 21 weeks, 77% of patients had good or excellent clinical outcomes according to the MacNab criteria. 12% of patients underwent reoperation at the index level for symptom recurrence or persistence. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 days. There was a 1% rate of both postoperative haematoma and infection. Mean operation duration was 86 minutes.

Conclusion: This case series represents the largest currently reported in the literature. Minimally invasive microdiscectomies performed through tubes allow for precise localisation, reduced tissue disruption and favourable clinical outcomes. Our results appear consistent with a review of the literature, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of this approach.