European Spine Journal最新文献

Purpose: While existing adult spinal deformity (ASD) alignment schemas acknowledge the dynamic relationship between the pelvis and spine, consideration of vertebral pelvic angles (VPA) thresholds for PJK may provide further insight into the relationship of each individual vertebra to the pelvis, which may allow for greater individualization of operative targets. Herein, we examine VPA's utility in preventing mechanical complications and its possible unification with prevalent scoring systems.

Methods: In a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected database, operative ASD patients ≥ 18 years with complete baseline (BL) and two-year (Y) operative, radiographic, and health-related quality of life data were included. Descriptive analyses, means comparison, and logistic regression tests were applied to explore demographic and surgical differences, as well as the impact of alignment goals on outcomes. Cohorts were grouped as patients who met VPA non-PJK thresholds, as defined by Duvvuri et al. 2023 alone versus traditional GAP/SAAS alignment matching versus combined VPA + SAAS + GAP. The Non-PJK VPA validated mean for L1PA was 10.4 ± 7.0 and T9PA 8.9 ± 7.5.

Results: 398 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 61 ± 14 years, 78% female, BL BMI 27 ± 6, BL CCI 2 ± 2). At baseline, mean vertebral pelvic angles were as follows: T1PA: 24 ± 14; T4PA 20 ± 13, T9PA 15 ± 12, L1PA 11 ± 10, L4PA 11 ± 6. Mean vertebral pelvic angles at 6 W postoperatively: T1PA 16 ± 10, T4PA 12 ± 10, T9PA 8 ± 9, L1PA 9 ± 8, L4PA 11 ± 5. 240 (60%) patients attained optimal L1PA, while 104 patients (26.1%) reached non-PJK mean for T9PA. 89 patients (22%) were optimal by both VPA standards. VPA-Optimal group demonstrated significantly lower rates of 1Y PJK (17% v 83%, p = 0.042) and PJF by 2Y (7% v. 93%, p = 0.038). When patients attained VPA goals in addition to GAP/SAAS goals at 6 W, they demonstrated significantly lower rates of Y1 PJK (p = 0.026) and Y1 and Y2 PJF. Those with optimal VPA registered greater SRS-22 scores across multiple domains (p < 0.02) as well as a greater rate of normal neurological examination at 6 W (p = 0.048).

Conclusions: Vertebral pelvic angles are a reliable measure of global alignment, and respecting certain targets may help prevent development of PJK/PJF. The value of VPA can be augmented through integration with GAP/SAAS frameworks to prevent complications and improve quality of life.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the difference in treatment duration and unplanned additional surgeries between patients with unidentified causative organisms on empiric antibiotics and those with identified organisms on selective antibiotics in treating thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis with minimally invasive posterior fixation.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis refractory to conservative treatment who underwent minimally invasive posterior fixation. Patients were divided into the identified (known causative organism) and unidentified groups (unknown causative organism). We analyzed data on demographics, antibiotic use, surgical outcomes, and infection control indicators.

Results: We included 74 patients, with 52 (70%) and 22 (30%) in the identified and unidentified groups, respectively. On admission, the identified group had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and more iliopsoas abscesses. The duration to postoperative CRP negative was similar in the identified and unidentified groups (7.13 vs. 6.48 weeks, p = 0.74). Only the identified group had unplanned additional surgeries due to poor infection control, affecting 6 of 52 patients (12%). Advanced age and causative organism identification increased the additional surgery odds (odds ratio [OR], 8.25; p = 0.033 and OR, 6.83; p = 0.034, respectively).

Conclusion: The use of empiric antibiotics in minimally invasive posterior fixation was effective without identifying the causative organism and did not prolong treatment duration. In patients with identified organisms, 12% required unplanned additional surgery, indicating a more challenging infection control. Causative organism identification was associated with the need for additional surgery, suggesting a more cautious treatment strategy for these patients.

Purpose: The identification of gene mutations in the modern medical workup of metastatic spine tumors has become more common but has not been highly utilized in surgical planning. Potential utility of these genetic markers as surrogates for cancer behavior in current prognosis scoring systems and overall survival (OS) remains underexplored in existing literature. This study seeks to investigate the association of frequently identified tumor markers, EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1, in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the spine with Tokuhashi prognosis scoring and OS.

Methods: Patients with NSCLC metastasis to spine were identified through chart review. EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 wild type vs. mutant type were identified from targeted chemotherapy genetic testing. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess gene profile contributions to Tokuhashi score. Cox Proportional Hazards models were generated for each tumor marker to assess the relationship between each marker and OS.

Results: A total of 119 patients with NSCLC spine metastasis were identified. We employed a multiple linear regression analysis to investigate the influence of EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 genotypes on the Tokuhashi score, revealing statistically significant relationships overall (p = 0.002). Individual genotype contributions include EGFR as a non-significant contributor (p = 0.269) and ALK and PD-L1 as significant contributors (p = 0.037 and p = 0.001 respectively). Overall survival was not significantly associated with tumor marker profiles through Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.46) or by multivariable analysis (p = 0.108).

Conclusion: ALK and PD-L1 were significantly associated with Tokuhashi score while EGFR was not. Tumor markers alone were not predictive of OS. These findings indicate that genetic markers found in NSCLC metastases to the spine may demonstrate prognostic value. Therefore, employing standard tumor markers could enhance the identification of appropriate surgical candidates, although they demonstrate limited effectiveness in predicting overall survival.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of preoperative VR-12 physical component scores (PCS) on outcomes following cervical disc replacement (CDR).

Methods: Patients undergoing elective CDR were retrospectively identified. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of interest included VR-12 PCS/VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS)/9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)/Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS and MCS/Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF)/Visual Analog Scale-Neck Pain (VAS-NP)/VAS-Arm Pain (VAS-AP)/Neck Disability Index (NDI). Baseline up to two-year postoperative scores were obtained (average follow-up: 9.2 ± 6.8months). Two cohorts were created: VR-12 PCS < 35 or VR-12 PCS ≥ 35. Improvements in scores from baseline to six weeks postoperatively and to final follow-up were calculated. Changes in scores were compared to previously reported thresholds to determine rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID).

Results: Of 127 patients, 64 were in the worse VR-12 PCS group. Patients with better VR-12 PCS were more likely to have private insurance (p = 0.034). When accounting for insurance differences, the worse VR-12 PCS group reported inferior NDI/VAS-NP/PHQ-9/PROMIS-PF/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS at six weeks and final follow-up (p ≤ 0.015, all). The worse VR-12 PCS group reported greater improvements in VAS-AP and VR-12 PCS by six weeks and in NDI/VR-12 MCS/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.026, all). Patients with worse VR-12 PCS reported greater MCID achievement for VR-12 MCS and SF-12 PCS (p ≤ 0.034, both).

Conclusion: Following surgery, patients with worse VR-12 PCS report greater improvements in PROs, highlighting the increased relative impact of surgery for patients with worse baseline physical function. These findings can be used to optimize patient experience perioperatively and inform postoperative expectations.

Purpose: Outpatient lumbar decompression surgeries have been successfully performed in France for over twenty years, earning acceptance. However, outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures and arthroplasties are less documented. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of outpatient lumbar instrumented surgery.

Methods: A prospective single-center study involving three experienced surgeons was conducted from September 2020 to September 2021, with a minimum six-month postoperative follow-up. Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 to 75 eligible for same-day discharge, undergoing single-level lumbar spinal fusion or arthroplasty via anterior or posterior Wiltse approach. The primary endpoint was assessing the percentage of successful outpatient discharges (within twelve hours), with secondary endpoints including perioperative/postoperative complications and discharge pain prescriptions in terms of frequency and severity.

Results: Forty patients (mean age: 44 years; 16/24 male/female ratio) underwent surgery, including 18 lumbar arthroplasties, twelve ALIF, and ten TLIF procedures. The majority of surgeries were performed at L4-L5 (18 procedures) and L5-S1 levels (22 procedures). 95% (38/40) of patients were successfully discharged within twelve hours, with only two patients discharged the following day. No postoperative hematomas, serious adverse events, or revision surgeries were noted.

Conclusion: 95% of patients were discharged successfully within twelve hours following outpatient lumbar fusion surgery, with a 100% patient satisfaction rate. Specific technical solutions were not necessary, and oral pain relief sufficed. Patient selection and education, including early pain management, played crucial roles in complication avoidance. This study underscores the safety of outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures, leading to cost reduction and expedited recovery.

Purpose: The literature is scarce in exploring the role of imaging parameters like ultrasound (US) as a biomarker for surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the associations between skin US parameters and revision surgery following spine lumbar fusion.

Methods: Posterior lumbar fusion patients with 2-years follow-up were assessed. Previous fusion or revision not due to adjacent segment disease (ASD) were excluded. Revisions were classified as cases and non-revision were classified as controls. US measurements conducted at two standardized locations on the lumbar back. Skin echogenicity of the average dermal (AD), upper 1/3 of the dermal (UD), lower 1/3 of the dermal (LD), and subcutaneous layer were measured. Echogenicity was calculated with the embedded echogenicity function of our institution's imaging platform (PACS). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 128 patients (51% female, age 62 [54-72] years) were included in the final analysis. 17 patients required revision surgery. AD, UD, and LD echogenicity showed significantly higher results among revision cases 124.5 [IQR = 115.75,131.63], 128.5 [IQR = 125,131.63] and 125.5 [IQR = 107.91,136.50] compared to the control group 114.3 [IQR = 98.83,124.8], 118.5 [IQR = 109.28,127.50], 114 [IQR = 94.20,126.75] respectively.

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate a significant association between higher echogenicity values in different layers of the dermis and requiring revision surgery. The results provide insights into the potential use of skin US parameters as predictors for revision surgery. These findings may reflect underlying alterations in collagen. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms driving these associations.