European Spine Journal最新文献

Purpose: This study aimed to consolidate the evidence regarding the prognostic influence of sarcopenia in degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.

Methods: A literature search of public databases was conducted up to Nov 15, 2023 using combinations of the key words "sarcopenia" and "lumbar spine surgery". Eligible studies were those that focused on adults undergoing decompression or fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases, and compared the outcomes between patients with and without preoperative sarcopenia. Primary outcomes were change in ODI and back and leg pain VAS pain scores. Secondary outcomes were changes in Eq. 5D, JOA, SFHS-p scores, and LOS.

Results: Ultimately, nine retrospective studies with a total of 993 patients were included. Sarcopenic patients exhibited significantly worse functional improvement as assessed by ODI compared to non-sarcopenic patients (pooled standardized mean difference [pSMD] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.90). Back pain (pSMD = 0.31, 95% CI:0.15-0.47) and leg pain (pSMD = 0.21, 95% CI:0.02 - 0.39) improvement were also less in sarcopenic patients. Non-sarcopenic patients had greater improvements in Eq. 5D (pSMD = 0.25) and SFHS-p (pSMD = 0.39), and shorter LOS (pSMD = 0.62).

Conclusions: As compared to patients without sarcopenia, those with sarcopenia undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative diseases have lower improvements in functional ability, quality of life, physical health, pain relief and extended hospitalization compared to those without sarcopenia.

Purpose: The sacral alar-iliac screw (SAIS) fixation technique has evolved from spinopelvic fixation which originated from S2AIS to sacroiliac joint fixation, with more reports regarding its application of S2AIS than S1AIS. However, there is a lack of comparative evidence to determine which technique is superior for sacroiliac joint fixation. This study aimed to determine which of the screws was superior in terms of implantation safety and biomechanical stability for sacroiliac joint fixation.

Methods: CT data of 80 normal pelvises were analyzed to measure the insertable range, trajectory lengths and widths of both S1AIS and S2AIS on 3D reconstruction models. Φ 6.5 mm and 8.0 mm screws were implanted on the left and right sides of fifty 3D printed pelvic models respectively to observe for breach of screw implantation. Ten synthetic pelvis models were used to simulate type C Tile injuries, and divided into 2 groups with an anterior plate and posterior fixation using one S1AIS or S2AIS on each side. The stiffness and maximum load of the plated and fixated models were measured under vertical loading.

Results: The trajectory lengths and widths of the S1AIS and S2AIS were similar (p > 0.05) and there was no breach for Φ 6.5 mm SAIS. However, both the insertable range and trajectory length on the sacral side of S2AIS (234.56 ± 10.06 mm², 40.97 ± 2.81 mm) were significantly less, and the breach rate of the posterior lateral cortex of the Φ 8.0 mm S2AIS (46%) was significantly higher than the S1AIS (307.55 ± 10.42 mm², 42.16 ± 3.06 mm, and 2%, p < 0.05). The stiffness and maximum load of S2AIS were less than S1AIS but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: S1AIS and S2AIS have similar screw trajectories and stability. However, S1AIS has a larger insertable range, less breach of the posterior lateral sacral cortex and longer trajectory length on the sacral side than S2AIS, which indicates S1AIS has higher implantation safety and a trend of better mechanical performance over S2AIS for sacroiliac joint fixation. Furthermore, S2AIS with an excessively large diameter should be used with caution for sacroiliac joint fixation.

Objective: To compare the differences between Ultrasound Volume Navigation (UVN), O-arm Navigation, and conventional X-ray fluoroscopy-guided screw placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgeries.

Methods: A total of 90 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF due to lumbar disc herniation from January 2022 to January 2023 were randomly assigned to the UVN group, O-arm group, and X-ray group. UVN, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance were used for screw placement in the respective groups, while the remaining surgical procedures followed routine MIS-TLIF protocols. Intraoperative data including average single screw placement time, total radiation dose, and average effective radiation dose per screw were recorded and calculated. On the 10th day after surgery, postoperative X-ray and CT examinations were conducted to assess screw placement accuracy and facet joint violation.

Results: There were no significant differences in general characteristics among the three groups, ensuring comparability. Firstly, the average single screw placement time in the O-arm group was significantly shorter than that in the UVN group and X-ray group (P<0.05). Secondly, in terms of total radiation dose during surgery, for single-level MIS-TLIF, the O-arm group had a significantly higher radiation dose compared to the UVN group and X-ray group (P<0.05). However, for multi-level MIS-TLIF, the X-ray group had a significantly higher radiation dose than the O-arm group and UVN group (P<0.05). In terms of average single screw radiation dose, the O-arm group and X-ray group were similar (P>0.05), while the UVN group was significantly lower than the other two groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in screw placement assessment grades among the three groups (P>0.05). However, in terms of facet joint violation rate, the UVN group (10.3%) and O-arm group (10.7%) showed no significant difference (P>0.05), while the X-ray group (26.7%) was significantly higher than both groups (P<0.05). Moreover, in the UVN group, there were significant correlations between average single screw placement time and placement grade with BMI index (r = 0.637, P<0.05; r = 0.504, P<0.05), while no similar significant correlations were found in the O-arm and X-ray groups.

Conclusion: UVN-guided screw placement in MIS-TLIF surgeries demonstrates comparable efficiency, visualization, and accuracy to O-arm navigation, while significantly reducing radiation exposure compared to both O-arm navigation and X-ray guidance. However, UVN may be influenced by factors like obesity, limiting its application.

Objectives: Single position lateral fusion with robotic assistance eliminates the need for surgical staging while harnessing the precision of robotic adjuncts. We expand on this technique by demonstrating the technical feasibility of placing bilateral pedicle screws with S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) fixation while in the lateral position.

Methods: A cadaveric study was performed using 12 human specimens. A retrospective clinical series was also performed for patients who had undergone robot-assisted placement of S2AI screws in lateral decubitus between June 2020 and June 2022. Case demographics, implant placement time, implant size, screw accuracy, and complications were recorded. Early postoperative radiographic outcomes were reported.

Results: In the cadaveric series, a total of 126 screws were placed with robotic assistance in 12 cadavers of which 24 screws were S2AI. There were four breaches from pedicle screws and none with S2AI screws for an overall accuracy rate of 96.8%. In the clinical series, four patients (all male, mean age 65.8 years) underwent single position lateral surgery with S2AI distal fixation. Mean BMI was 33.6 and mean follow-up was 20.5 months. Mean radiographic improvements were lumbar lordosis 12.3 ± 4.7°, sagittal vertical axis 1.5 ± 2.1 cm, pelvic tilt 8.5 ± 10.0°, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch 12.3 ± 4.7°. A total of 42 screws were placed of which eight screws were S2AI. There were two breaches from pedicle screws and none from S2AI screws for an overall accuracy rate of 95.2%. No repositioning or salvage techniques were required for the S2AI screws.

Conclusions: We demonstrate here the technical feasibility of single position robot-assisted placement of S2-alar-iliac screws in the lateral decubitus position for single position surgery.

Purpose: Surgical stabilization of the Atlas vertebrae is indicated for severe atlantoaxial instability (AAI) in patients with Down syndrome (DS). This study aims to evaluate the morphological characteristics of the Atlas lateral mass (ALM) in patients with DS with regard to safe instrumentation for surgical stabilization and to compare them with non-syndromic group.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, case-control study included age- and sex-matched patients with and without DS aged > 7 years with a cervical computed tomography (CT) scan. After three-dimensional CT reconstruction, nine parameters were evaluated for both groups. All included measurements were performed by a neuroradiologist who was blinded to clinical data.

Results: Forty-three of 3,275 patients with DS were included in this study. Matching number of consecutive patients without DS were identified (mean age: 16 years). Patients with DS were significantly shorter than those without DS. Seven of nine parameters related to ALM were significantly lower in patients with DS than in those in the control group, including anterior wall height (AH), posterior wall height (PH), their ratio, and arch-ALM angle. On adjusting data for patient height, patients with DS had a smaller PH, lower PH/AH ratio, and steeper arch-ALM angle than the control group.

Conclusions: Patients with DS had a smaller posterior ALM wall and a steeper arch-ALM angle than the control group without DS. This information is important for surgical planning of safe posterior ALM exposure and safe instrumentation for surgical stabilization in patients with DS.

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of nutritional scores comprising the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in prediction of multilevel vertebral involvement (> 2 vertebra) in Spinal Tuberculosis (STB).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 39 STB patients was conducted to assess nutritional indices (CONUT and PNI) and the numbers of vertebral affection. Spearman's correlation was used to examine the association between these variables. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to determine optimal cutoff values, with Area Under the Curve (AUROC) evaluation. Additionally, multiple logistic regression was performed as a predictive model.

Results: There were 24 males and 15 females, with a mean BMI of 18.88 kg/m² (± 1.37). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed negative correlations between BMI, PNI (rho - 0.68, p < 0.001) and multilevel vertebra involvement, while ESR (rho 0.83, p < 0.001), CRP (rho 0.81, p < 0.001), and CONUT score (rho 0.83, p < 0.001) positively correlated with multilevel vertebral affection (> 2 vertebra). Age and comorbidities showed no correlation with the level of vertebral affection. ROC analysis revealed a CONUT Score ≥ 3 cutoff (sensitivity-95.7%, specificity-87.5%) and PNI ≤ 38.605 (sensitivity-78.3%, specificity-93.8%) for predicting multilevel STB (> 2). PNI exhibited superior specificity and positive predictive value where as CONUT score was a better parameter for sensitivity, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy. Both CONUT score and PNI were significant predictors of vertebral involvement in univariate analysis, with multivariate analysis identifying CONUT score as the sole predictor of multilevel vertebral affection.

Conclusion: Nutritional scores, including CONUT score and PNI, emerged as significant predictors of multilevel STB. CONUT score displayed superior sensitivity, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy, while PNI served as a nutritional marker with high specificity and positive predictive value in predicting multilevel involvement in spinal tuberculosis.

Purpose: Frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes following spine surgery. The ability of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) to predict adverse outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has not been studied extensively and may improve preoperative risk stratification.

Methods: Patients undergoing PLIF were queried from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2019-2020). The relationship between RAI-measured preoperative frailty and primary outcomes (mortality, non-home discharge (NHD)) and secondary outcomes (extended length of stay (eLOS), complication rates) was assessed via multivariate analyses. The discriminatory accuracy of the RAI for primary outcomes was measured in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis.

Results: A total of 429,380 PLIF patients (mean age = 61y) were identified, with frailty cohorts stratified by standard RAI convention: 0-20 "robust" (R)(38.3%), 21-30 "normal" (N)(54.3%), 31-40 "frail" (F)(6.1%) and 41+ "very frail" (VF)(1.3%). The incidence of primary and secondary outcomes increased as frailty thresholds increased: mortality (R 0.1%, N 0.1%, F 0.4%, VF 1.3%; p < 0.001), NHD (R 6.5%, N 18.1%, F 36.9%, VF 42.0%; p < 0.001), eLOS (R 18.0%, N 21.9%, F 31.6%, VF 43.8%; p < 0.001) and complication rates (R 6.6%, N 8.8%, F 11.1%, VF 12.2%; p < 0.001). The RAI demonstrated acceptable discrimination for NHD (C-statistic: 0.706) and mortality (C-statistic: 0.676) in AUROC curve analysis.

Conclusion: Increasing RAI-measured frailty is significantly associated with increased NHD, eLOS, complication rates, and mortality following PLIF. The RAI demonstrates acceptable discrimination for predicting NHD and mortality, and may be used to improve frailty-based risk assessment for spine surgeons.

Distinct lesions are derived from notochordal cells (NCDL), ranging from benign to malignant ones. This study presents fifty NCDL cases diagnosed in a tertiary hospital of reference from the past 55 years: forty-two conventional chordomas, including one chondroid chordoma subtype, four benign notochordal cell tumors (BNCT), two conventional chordomas with BNCT foci, and two dedifferentiated chordomas. All patients were adults. Three BNCT were incidentally diagnosed, and one case presented local pain. Chordomas began with local pain and/or neurological symptoms. BNCT were well-defined intraosseous lesions, hypointense on T1-weighted images (WI) and hyperintense on T2-WI, without enhancement in the contrast. Conventional chordomas, including its chondroid subtype, were lobulated masses with cortical disruption and soft tissue extension, hypointense on T1-WI and hyperintense on T2-WI, with variable contrast enhancement. BNCT were histologically composed of solid sheets of vacuolated cells with clear cytoplasm and round and central nuclei. No atypia, lobular growth pattern, myxoid matrix, or bone infiltration were seen. Conventional chordomas were histologically composed of physaliphorous cells in a myxoid stroma with lobulated and infiltrating growth patterns. Observational follow-up using radiological controls was decided on for the BNCT cases. None of these cases presented local recurrence or metastasis. En-bloc resection and adjuvant radiotherapy were selected for sacral and vertebral chordoma cases. Sixteen patients died due to tumor-related factors; twenty-eight presented local recurrence, and four developed distant metastases. New therapeutic options are being studied for chordoma cases. Clinical, radiological, and histopathological data are necessary to properly diagnose and follow up of NCDL.

Study design: Retrospective cohort analysis.

Objective: CCS is the most common type of incomplete spinal cord injury and can occur without or with bony injury. Surgical intervention and its timing for patients diagnosed with CCS has been controversial. The current study assessed utilization of and factors associated with operative intervention and its timing in patients diagnosed with central cord syndrome (CCS) in the absence of bony injury.

Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with CCS in the absence of vertebral fracture were queried from the national, multi-insurance, administrative 2015-2020 M151 PearlDiver database. The incidence, trends, and timing of operative intervention following CCS were assessed. Patient characteristics associated with surgical intervention and its timing were determined.

Results: From 2015 to 2020, 11,653 patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified, of which surgical intervention was identified for 2,003 (17.2%) and thus nonsurgical intervention for 9,650 (82.8%). The proportion of patients undergoing operative intervention evolved from 11.5% in 2015 to 19.7% in 2020 (p < 0.0001). Of those undergoing surgical intervention, the greatest increase was seen for those undergoing surgery within two days of diagnosis (5.5% in 2015 to 12.3% in 2020, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, more recent year of service, region of service, younger age, and higher comorbidity burden were independent predictors of operative management (p < 0.05 for all).

Conclusion: The majority of a large cohort of patients with first diagnosis CCS in the absence of bony injury were managed non-operatively. Operative management increased over the years of study, were performed earlier after diagnosis, and varied based on patient characteristic and geographic region.

Purpose: To study trends in incidence and outcome of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in the Netherlands before, during and after implementation of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS^®) and Pre-Hospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS^®)- Spinal Motion Restriction(SMR) protocol.

Methods: In an observational database we studied national hospital admission and emergency department databases to analyse incidence rates and outcome of traumatic spinal cord injury and spinal fractures in the emergency department and in admittances in The Netherlands between 1986 and 2021.

Results: A significant increase of 39% in TSCI in admitted patients with spinal fractures over the past 35 years (p < 0.001). This increase was especially prevalent in cervical spinal fractures (132%), while thoracic and lumbosacral spinal fractures showed a decrease in accompanied TSCI (64% and 88% respectively). The overall increase in spinal fractures was not significant. The duration of hospital admission decreased for spinal fractures without TSCI and with TSCI (66% and 56% respectively).

Conclusion: Since implementation of the SMR-protocol was aiming to limit TSCI in patients who suffered a spinal fracture, the increase in TSCI is an unexpected finding. Exact explanation for this increase is unclear and the contribution of the SMR-protocol is not fully understood due to confounders in the used datasets. Either way, the scientific evidence supporting this costly time- and labor-intensive SMR-protocol remains debated, along with evidence contradicting it. Therefore it stresses the need for clear, evidencebased reasoning for spinal immobilization according to ATLS, as this is currently lacking.