European Spine Journal最新文献

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between spinal cord anatomy and the risk of curve progression in mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: We prospectively included patients presenting with mild or moderate AIS (< 40 degrees). Irrespective of curve severity, patients underwent 3-dimensional MRI and were followed until skeletal maturity or surgery. Retrospectively, we measured the true lateral cord space (LCS) ratio on transverse cuts of the curve apex. This is a measure of the lateral displacement of the medulla in the spinal canal. The primary outcome measure was curve progression defined as a Cobb angle increase ≥ 10 degrees at follow-up.

Results: Of the 64 included patients, 18 (28%) progressed more than 10 degrees during follow-up. At baseline, mean age in the progression and non-progression group was 13.1 ± 1.6 vs. 15.8 ± 1.5 years (p < 0.001), and mean Cobb angle was 32 ± 7 vs. 26 ± 9 degrees (p < 0.001). The time from baseline x-ray to MRI was 1.3 ± 3 months vs. 1.7 ± 3.6 months (p = 0.738). LCS ratio was 1.5 (IQR: 1.1-1.7) in the progression group and 1.0 (IQR:0.8-1.3) in the non-progression group (p < 0.001). When matched according to baseline Cobb angle and age, median LCS ratio was 1.5 [1.1, 1.7] and 0.9 [0.7-1.2] in the progression and non-progression group, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: We found significant displacement of the medulla towards the concavity of the curve in progressive AIS. This finding supports the theory of a neuro-osseous growth mismatch as a part of the etiopathophysiology of AIS and may play a predictive role in prognosis of milder cases of AIS.

Objective: This study systematically assesses the learning curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) techniques across various spinal surgeries, focusing on its influence on operative efficiency and complication rates to guide optimized training and practice.

Methods: Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified studies on UBE learning curves for patients aged 18 or older, comparing early and mastery phases. Two reviewers independently extracted data on surgery type, operative time, and complications. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We performed subgroup analyses based on different UBE surgery types, examining variations in operative time and complication rates across each procedure.

Results: Thirteen studies, including 1217 patients, were included, focusing on lumbar spine surgeries. The average learning curve cutoff for UBE procedures was 32.18 cases, with the mastery phase reducing operative time by an average of 48.14 min (95% CI 35.80, 60.47; p < 0.001), although high heterogeneity observed. In the mastery phase, single-group analysis of 707 patients showed a mean operative time of 92.38 min (95% CI 77.35, 107.41). Complication analysis across 12 studies (1182 patients) revealed a significantly lower rate in the mastery phase (odds ratio, OR = 0.29; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions in both operative time and complications for UBE-LIF and UBE-LD/ULBD during the mastery phase, while no significant changes were observed for UBE-PCF. Additionally, specific complications, such as dural tears and incomplete decompression, were significantly reduced in the mastery phase.

Conclusion: This systematic review confirms a learning curve in UBE surgery, with improvements in operative time and complications. Procedure-specific cutoff points provide guidance for training and future research.

Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the costs of spinal fusion surgery between patients with and without diabetes.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of four databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies examining diabetic versus non-diabetic adults undergoing cervical/lumbar fusion in terms of cost. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model in the presence of heterogeneity.

Results: Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. Standardized costs were significantly higher in the diabetic group (SMD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, p < 0.05). The excess cost per diabetic patient undergoing spinal fusion surgery was estimated to be $2,492 (95% CI: $1,620 to $3,363). The length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the diabetes group (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.60, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in intensive care unit admission between the groups (OR 4.15, 95% CI 0.55 to 31.40, p > 0.05). Reoperation showed no significant differences between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.35, p > 0.05). However, 30-day and 90-day readmissions were significantly higher in the diabetes group: (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.62, p < 0.05) and (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.68, p < 0.001), respectively. Non-routine or non-home discharge was also significantly higher in the diabetes group (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.13, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with diabetes undergoing spinal fusion surgery had increased costs, prolonged LOS, increased 30-day/90-day readmission rates, and more frequent non-routine discharges.

Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional, observational study was to establish the relationship between standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and lateral decubitus LL.

Methods: Forty-nine subjects, 24 male and 25 female, were prospectively enrolled. Patients with pre-existing spinopelvic pathology were excluded. Standing, relaxed-seated, and lateral decubitus lateral radiographs were obtained. Radiographic variables measured included LL and lordosis change at each lumbar level (e.g. L1-L2). The change in LL when going from a standing to a lateral decubitus position (ΔLL), the correlation between standing and sitting LL compared to lateral decubitus LL, and the correlation between ΔLL and standing pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch, pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and sacral slope (SS) were calculated.

Results: Subjects had an average age of 25.7 ± 2.3 years and body mass index of 24.1 ± 3.0 kg/m². On average, 11.9°±8.2° (range - 7° to 29°) of LL was lost when transitioning from a standing to the lateral decubitus position. Lateral decubitus LL had a higher correlation with standing LL (R = 0.725, p < 0.001) than with relaxed-seated LL (R = 0.434, p < 0.001). Standing PT and PI-LL mismatch had moderately negative correlations with ΔLL (R=-0.58 and R=-0.59, respectively, both p < 0.05). Standing PI and standing PFA had a low negative correlation with ΔLL (R=-0.31 and R=-0.44, respectively, both p < 0.05) Standing SS and LL had no correlation with ΔLL.

Conclusions: Standing LL was strongly correlated to lateral decubitus LL, although subjects lost an average of 11.9° from the standing to the lateral decubitus position. This has important implications for fusion in the lateral position.

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the impact of cervical kyphosis on the locations of average center of rotation (COR) of each level preoperatively and to investigate whether uncorrected cervical kyphosis increases the incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients surgically treated for cervical myelopathy, radiculopathy, or deformity at a single institution from 2012 to 2018. They were divided into cervical kyphosis and cervical lordosis cohorts. Propensity score matching was performed. Preoperative cervical segmental and postoperative adjacent segment CORs were measured. Development of symptomatic ASD in all patients was assessed after > 5 years of follow-up.

Results: Among 412 patients with cervical lordosis and 47 patients with S-type cervical kyphosis, we established 37 matched pairs before and after surgery. In total, 368 COR locations were measured. Uncorrected kyphosis was identified in seven patients. The CORs of the cervical spine were located farther forward and upward in the cervical kyphosis group than in the control group (p < 0.05). At 1-year visit after ACDF, the locations of the adjacent COR showed no significant differences between the cervical postoperative lordosis group and control group. The incidence of symptomatic ASD was significantly higher in the uncorrected kyphosis group than in the corrected kyphosis group (42.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.001) and lordosis group (42.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Cervical kyphosis can impact the locations of COR and increase the incidence of symptomatic ASD. Kyphosis correction is needed during ACDF in patients with cervical kyphosis.

Purpose: To present two cases of life-threatening hemorrhage related to lumbar artery injury in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients following S2‑alar‑iliac (S2AI) fixation and asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and discuss the possible reasons for postoperative hemorrhage in these patients.

Methods: Patient A was a 52-year-old female with degenerative lumbar scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion from T₈-S₂ and one-level PSO at L₂. Patient B was a 24-year-old male with severe kyphoscoliosis due to non-ambulatory cerebral palsy, who underwent posterior spinal fusion from T₃-S₂ and one-level PSO at L₁. Both patients underwent asymmetric PSO, where a larger wedge was resected from the convex side of the vertebral body rather than the concave side.

Results: Both patients occurred a sudden increase in drainage within 3 h postoperatively, who were under anesthesia in AICU. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was emergently performed and revealed that the bleeding sites were from the lumbar artery, which was adherent to the convex side of the osteotomized vertebra in both cases. Then successful bleeding control was achieved through vascular embolization. Postoperative CT revealed spike formation at the anterior edges of the open wedge at the PSO level due to sagittal translation (ST), with noticeable derotation of the osteotomized vertebra.

Conclusion: For patients with severe kyphoscoliosis, asymmetrical PSO increases the risk of lumbar artery injury on the convex side, and postoperative ST may further contribute to this risk. In cases where a sudden increase in drainage is observed postoperatively, it is crucial to consider the possibility of lumbar artery injury, particularly on the convex side of the osteotomized vertebra.

Background: CaO-SiO₂-P₂O₅-B₂O₃ bioactive glass-ceramics7 (BGS-7) are known for their strong integration with bone and stability and are commonly used in spinal fusions.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare fusion rates and radiological and clinical outcomes between BGS-7 and allograft spacers with iliac bone grafts (IBG) in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgeries.

Study design/setting: This retrospective study was conducted at BRM Medical Center.

Patient sample: We included patients who underwent multilevel ACDF at BRM Medical Center between January 2012 and December 2023. The patients had symptoms such as cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy due to cervical disc herniation, stenosis, and spondylosis.

Outcome measures: We evaluated the preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index (NDI), functional rating index (FRI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the neck, shoulder, and upper extremities at 6 months and 1 year after surgery.

Methods: Fusion rates were assessed using dynamic radiography and computed tomography (CT) scans at 1 year postoperatively. Radiological measurements were obtained from preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs.

Results: At the 1-year follow-up, the fusion rates were 89.5% for BGS-7 and 92.2% for the allograft cage on dynamic radiographs (p=0.156) and 93.4% and 90.4%, respectively, on CT scans (p=0.319), confirming both internal and external osseointegration. Subsidence rates were 4% for BGS-7 and 10% for the allograft spacer group. Both groups showed increased cervical lordosis (CL), segmental lordosis (SL), and segmental height postoperatively, with maintained lower segmental height (LSH) in the BGS-7 group than in the allograft spacer group at postoperatively 1 year. No adjacent segmental disease (ASD) occurred in either group. The JOA, NDI, and FRI showed significant improvements in both groups. The VAS scores decreased significantly in both groups, indicating improved clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: In multilevel ACDF, BGS-7 demonstrated fusion rates comparable to those of the allograft spacer with IBG, experiencing fewer instances of subsidence and cage fracture. Therefore, BGS-7 spacer can be safely utilized in multilevel ACDF as a substitute for traditional allograft spacers, without the need for additional IBG.

Purpose: Degenerative spine disease (DSD) is increasingly prevalent due to aging populations, leading to higher surgical interventions and associated complications. This necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment, evaluating frailty through tools such as the modified Frailty Index 5 and modified Frailty Index 11 (mFI-5 and mFI-11). Despite the utility of mFI-5 and mFI-11 in predicting postoperative complications, these indices do not account for sarcopenia, a syndrome related to but distinct from frailty, which is associated with higher complication rates. This paper aims to retrospectively evaluate the influence of sarcopenia and frailty on postoperative adverse events in a cohort of patients who underwent posterior spine fusion for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

Methods: A retrospective review of 286 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spine fusion for DSD was conducted. Frailty was measured using mFI-5 and mFI-11, while sarcopenia was assessed through Psoas to Lumbar Vertebral Index (PLVI) on magnetic resonance images. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications within 30 days. Statistical analysis involved univariate and multivariate models to determine the predictors of complications.

Results: Higher frailty scores were significantly associated with increased postoperative complications (p < .05). However, sarcopenia showed no significant correlation with postoperative complications rates, except for pneumological complications (p = .031). Multivariate analysis confirmed frailty as a strong independent predictor of postoperative complications, while sarcopenia had limited impact.

Conclusion: Frailty is a robust predictor of postoperative complications in DSD surgeries, while sarcopenia, appears to play a lesser role. The findings suggest that frailty alone provide a more comprehensive assessment of risk than sarcopenia.

Purpose: The demand for SIJ fusion among obese patients has grown substantially. However, the clinical relevance of obesity in the context of SI joint fusion has not been well investigated specifically, whether there is a BMI cutoff above which the benefit-risk ratio is low.

Methods: Adult patients ≥ 21 years of age who underwent minimally invasive SIJ fusion between 2020 and 2023. Participants were classified using the National Institutes for Health body mass index (BMI). Patients with a BMI of 30 to 39 with no significant comorbidity are considered obese, patients with a BMI of 35 to 39 with a significant comorbidity or a BMI of 40 or greater are considered morbidly obese. All subjects completed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and 12 months. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine the impact of BMI category on score changes.

Results: Overall, mean VAS improved at 12 months by 2.5 points (p < .006). Over the 12-month follow-up period, BMI category did not impact mean improvement in VAS (ANOVA p = .08). Mean ODI at 12 months improved by 23.2 points (p < .001). BMI category did impact mean improvement in ODI (ANOVA p = .03).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates similar benefits across all BMI categories. This data suggests that obese patients do benefit from minimally invasive SIJ fusion, specifically the 35-40 BMI cohort of patients, and should not be denied this procedure based on arbitrary healthcare organizations BMI criteria.