首页 > 最新文献

Hpb最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of patient age on outcome of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched study 患者年龄对微创与开腹胰十二指肠切除术结果的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.008
Anouk M.L.H. Emmen , Leia R. Jones , Kongyuan Wei , Olivier Busch , Baiyong Shen , Giuseppe K. Fusai , Yi-Ming Shyr , Igor Khatkov , Steve White , Ugo Boggi , Mustafa Kerem , I.Q. Molenaar , Bas G. Koerkamp , Olivier Saint-Marc , Safi Dokmak , Susan van Dieren , Renzo Rozzini , Sebastiaan Festen , Rong Liu , Jin-Young Jang , Mohammed A. Hilal

Background

Pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients may be associated with increased postoperative mortality, but studies in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) are scarce.

Methods

International multicenter retrospective study including patients aged >60 years undergoing MIPD (robot-assisted and laparoscopic) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD), were categorized by age: 60–69, 70–79, and 80+ years. In each category, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (1:1 ratio) between MIPD and OPD. Primary outcome was 30-day/in-hospital mortality.

Results

Among 3820 patients, we matched 1468 patients aged 60–69, 1154 patients aged 70–79, and 196 patients aged 80+ years. In patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years, MIPD was associated with longer operative time, less blood loss and a longer length of stay. Major morbidity was higher after MIPD with similar 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The R0 resection rate was higher after MIPD. In patients aged 80+ years, besides a longer operative time in MIPD, outcomes were comparable between both groups.

Conclusion

This study found no evidence that increasing age worsens mortality of MIPD. MIPD was associated with longer operative time, higher rate of major morbidity, prolonged length of stay versus less blood loss and a higher R0 resection in patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years. These differences continue in patients aged 80+ years, but became less evident.
背景:老年患者的胰十二指肠切除术可能会增加术后死亡率:老年患者接受胰十二指肠切除术可能会增加术后死亡率,但有关微创胰十二指肠切除术(MIPD)的研究却很少:国际多中心回顾性研究包括接受微创胰十二指肠切除术(机器人辅助和腹腔镜)和开腹胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)的 60 岁以上患者,按年龄分为 60-69 岁、70-79 岁和 80 岁以上。在每个类别中,在 MIPD 和 OPD 之间进行倾向得分匹配 (PSM)(1:1 比例)。主要结果是30天/住院死亡率:在 3820 名患者中,我们匹配了 1468 名 60-69 岁患者、1154 名 70-79 岁患者和 196 名 80 岁以上患者。在 60-69 岁和 70-79 岁的患者中,MIPD 与手术时间长、失血少和住院时间长相关。MIPD术后主要发病率较高,但30天/住院死亡率相似。MIPD术后的R0切除率更高。在80岁以上的患者中,除了MIPD的手术时间更长外,两组患者的治疗效果相当:结论:本研究没有发现任何证据表明,年龄的增加会降低MIPD的死亡率。在 60-69 岁和 70-79 岁的患者中,MIPD 与较长的手术时间、较高的主要发病率、较长的住院时间和较少的失血以及较高的 R0 切除率相关。这些差异在 80 岁以上的患者中继续存在,但变得不那么明显。
{"title":"Impact of patient age on outcome of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched study","authors":"Anouk M.L.H. Emmen ,&nbsp;Leia R. Jones ,&nbsp;Kongyuan Wei ,&nbsp;Olivier Busch ,&nbsp;Baiyong Shen ,&nbsp;Giuseppe K. Fusai ,&nbsp;Yi-Ming Shyr ,&nbsp;Igor Khatkov ,&nbsp;Steve White ,&nbsp;Ugo Boggi ,&nbsp;Mustafa Kerem ,&nbsp;I.Q. Molenaar ,&nbsp;Bas G. Koerkamp ,&nbsp;Olivier Saint-Marc ,&nbsp;Safi Dokmak ,&nbsp;Susan van Dieren ,&nbsp;Renzo Rozzini ,&nbsp;Sebastiaan Festen ,&nbsp;Rong Liu ,&nbsp;Jin-Young Jang ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Hilal","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients may be associated with increased postoperative mortality, but studies in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) are scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>International multicenter retrospective study including patients aged &gt;60 years undergoing MIPD (robot-assisted and laparoscopic) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD), were categorized by age: 60–69, 70–79, and 80+ years. In each category, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (1:1 ratio) between MIPD and OPD. Primary outcome was 30-day/in-hospital mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3820 patients, we matched 1468 patients aged 60–69, 1154 patients aged 70–79, and 196 patients aged 80+ years. In patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years, MIPD was associated with longer operative time, less blood loss and a longer length of stay. Major morbidity was higher after MIPD with similar 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The R0 resection rate was higher after MIPD. In patients aged 80+ years, besides a longer operative time in MIPD, outcomes were comparable between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found no evidence that increasing age worsens mortality of MIPD. MIPD was associated with longer operative time, higher rate of major morbidity, prolonged length of stay versus less blood loss and a higher R0 resection in patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years. These differences continue in patients aged 80+ years, but became less evident.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142582959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
T1b gallbladder cancer: is extended resection warranted? T1b胆囊癌:延长切除是必要的吗?
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.018
Montserrat Chavez, Xabier de Aretxabala, Hector Losada, Norberto Portillo, Felipe Castillo, Luis Bustos, Ivan Roa

Background: Although the prognosis for gallbladder cancer (GBCA) improves with early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment, the management of patients with muscle layer invasion (T1b) remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the optimal surgical approach for these patients.

Methods: A database was queried for patients with early T1b GBCA treated at four Chilean hospitals. Patients were prospectively treated and registered by the same surgical team at each hospital. Clinical outcomes, including survival rates according to the type of surgery, were analyzed.

Results: Between 1988 and 2023, 129 Chilean patients were pathologically diagnosed with T1b GBCA. Simple cholecystectomy (SC) was performed in 86 patients (66.7 %), while extended cholecystectomy (EC) was performed in 43 patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83 %, with no significant difference between SC and EC patients.

Conclusion: Simple cholecystectomy demonstrated survival rates comparable to extended cholecystectomy for patients with T1b GBCA. More extensive resections did not improve the prognosis.

背景:虽然胆囊癌(GBCA)的预后随着早期诊断和积极的手术治疗而改善,但肌肉层侵犯(T1b)患者的处理仍然存在争议。本研究旨在分析这些患者的最佳手术入路。方法:对智利四家医院治疗的早期T1b GBCA患者进行数据库查询。患者在每家医院的同一外科团队进行前瞻性治疗和登记。分析临床结果,包括根据手术类型的生存率。结果:1988年至2023年间,129名智利患者病理诊断为T1b GBCA。86例(66.7%)患者行单纯性胆囊切除术(SC), 43例行扩展性胆囊切除术(EC)。SC和EC患者的总体5年生存率为83%,无显著差异。结论:对于T1b GBCA患者,单纯胆囊切除术的生存率与扩展胆囊切除术相当。更广泛的切除并没有改善预后。
{"title":"T1b gallbladder cancer: is extended resection warranted?","authors":"Montserrat Chavez, Xabier de Aretxabala, Hector Losada, Norberto Portillo, Felipe Castillo, Luis Bustos, Ivan Roa","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the prognosis for gallbladder cancer (GBCA) improves with early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment, the management of patients with muscle layer invasion (T1b) remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the optimal surgical approach for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database was queried for patients with early T1b GBCA treated at four Chilean hospitals. Patients were prospectively treated and registered by the same surgical team at each hospital. Clinical outcomes, including survival rates according to the type of surgery, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1988 and 2023, 129 Chilean patients were pathologically diagnosed with T1b GBCA. Simple cholecystectomy (SC) was performed in 86 patients (66.7 %), while extended cholecystectomy (EC) was performed in 43 patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83 %, with no significant difference between SC and EC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simple cholecystectomy demonstrated survival rates comparable to extended cholecystectomy for patients with T1b GBCA. More extensive resections did not improve the prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. 糖尿病对胰腺手术患者术后并发症的影响。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.020
Sandra de Kalbermatten, David Martin, Emilie Uldry, Emmanuel Melloul, Nicolas Demartines, David Fuks, Gaëtan-Romain Joliat

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols decrease postoperative complications, but data on their effect on diabetic patients undergoing pancreatectomy are scarce. This study assessed whether diabetes mellitus (DM) was a morbidity predictor after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program.

Methods: A cross-sectional study including all patients who underwent pancreatectomy (2012-2022) and followed an ERAS pathway was performed. Multivariable analysis was used to determine whether DM was a morbidity predictor. Association between ERAS compliance and morbidity rate was assessed.

Results: A total of 558 patients were included (266 women, median age 66, median body-mass index 25). Most patients underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy (n=369, 66%). In diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance≤60 %, morbidity was 38/40 (95%), whereas in diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance>60 %, it decreased to 37/50 (74%, p=0.008). DM was not found as an independent complication predictor (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.4-1.2, p=0.186), while body-mass index>25 kg/m2 and preoperative biliary stenting were preoperative morbidity predictors (OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.1, p=0.049; OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.5, p=0.044).

Conclusion: This study showed that DM was not associated with postoperative complications after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program. It highlighted the importance of a good ERAS compliance to decrease the risk of postoperative complications in DM patients.

背景:ERAS方案减少了术后并发症,但其对行胰腺切除术的糖尿病患者的影响的数据很少。本研究评估糖尿病(DM)是否是ERAS项目中胰腺切除术后发病的预测因子。方法:横断面研究包括所有接受胰腺切除术(2012-2022)并遵循ERAS途径的患者。采用多变量分析确定糖尿病是否是发病率预测因子。评估ERAS依从性与发病率之间的关系。结果:共纳入558例患者(女性266例,中位年龄66岁,中位体重指数25)。大多数患者行开腹胰十二指肠切除术(n=369, 66%)。ERAS总体依从性≤60%的糖尿病患者发病率为38/40(95%),而ERAS总体依从性≤60%的糖尿病患者发病率降至37/50 (74%,p=0.008)。糖尿病不是并发症的独立预测因素(OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.4-1.2, p=0.186),而体重指数>25 kg/m2和术前胆道支架置入术是术前发病率的预测因素(OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.1, p=0.049;OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.5, p=0.044)。结论:本研究显示糖尿病与ERAS项目中胰腺切除术后并发症无关。它强调了良好的ERAS依从性对于降低糖尿病患者术后并发症的风险的重要性。
{"title":"Impact of diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.","authors":"Sandra de Kalbermatten, David Martin, Emilie Uldry, Emmanuel Melloul, Nicolas Demartines, David Fuks, Gaëtan-Romain Joliat","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols decrease postoperative complications, but data on their effect on diabetic patients undergoing pancreatectomy are scarce. This study assessed whether diabetes mellitus (DM) was a morbidity predictor after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study including all patients who underwent pancreatectomy (2012-2022) and followed an ERAS pathway was performed. Multivariable analysis was used to determine whether DM was a morbidity predictor. Association between ERAS compliance and morbidity rate was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 558 patients were included (266 women, median age 66, median body-mass index 25). Most patients underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy (n=369, 66%). In diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance≤60 %, morbidity was 38/40 (95%), whereas in diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance>60 %, it decreased to 37/50 (74%, p=0.008). DM was not found as an independent complication predictor (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.4-1.2, p=0.186), while body-mass index>25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and preoperative biliary stenting were preoperative morbidity predictors (OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.1, p=0.049; OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.5, p=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that DM was not associated with postoperative complications after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program. It highlighted the importance of a good ERAS compliance to decrease the risk of postoperative complications in DM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic versus open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma according to the procedure's complexity: real-world weighted data from a national register. 根据手术的复杂性,腹腔镜与开放式肝细胞癌切除术:来自国家登记的真实世界加权数据。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.017
Simone Famularo, Flavio Milana, Francesco Ardito, Federica Cipriani, Alessandro Vitale, Andrea Lauterio, Matteo Serenari, Andrea Fontana, Daniele Nicolini, Mario Giuffrida, Mattia Garancini, Tommaso Dominioni, Matteo Zanello, Pasquale Perri, Quirino Lai, Simone Conci, Sarah Molfino, Mariano Giglio, Giuliano LaBarba, Cecilia Ferrari, Maria Conticchio, Paola Germani, Maurizio Romano, Stefan Patauner, Andrea Belli, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Adelmo Antonucci, Luca Fumagalli, Albert Troci, Michela De Angelis, Luigi Boccia, Michele Crespi, Moh'd A Hilal, Francesco Izzo, Antonio Frena, Giacomo Zanus, Paola Tarchi, Riccardo Memeo, Guido Griseri, Giorgio Ercolani, Roberto Troisi, Gian L Baiocchi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Massimo Rossi, Gian L Grazi, Elio Jovine, Marcello Maestri, Fabrizio Romano, Raffaele D Valle, Marco Vivarelli, Alessandro Ferrero, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Umberto Cillo, Luca Aldrighetti, Felice Giuliante, Guido Torzilli

Background: Minimal access liver surgery (MALS) is considered superior to open liver resection (OLR) in reducing the perioperative risk in patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No national-level comparisons exist based on procedure complexity. This study aims to compare postoperative complications, postoperative ascites (POA), and major complications (MC) between MALS and OLR.

Methods: Data were retrieved from the Italian HE. RC.O.LE.S. registry. Patients were categorized into OLR or MALS groups and stratified by complexity grade (CP1, CP2, CP3). An inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to ensure balanced comparisons.

Results: From 2008 to 2021, 4738 patients were included: 1596 (33.7 %) underwent MALS, and 3142 (66.3 %) underwent OLR. CP1 procedures were conducted in 2522 cases (53.2 %), CP2 in 974 cases (20.5 %), and CP3 in 1242 cases (26.2 %). For CP1, MALS was associated with reduced POA (OR 0.356, 95%CI:0.29-0.43, p < 0.001), and MC (OR 0.738, 95%CI:0.59-0.91, p: 0.006). In CP2, MALS showed association with MC (OR 0.557, 95%CI:0.37-0.82, p:0.004), but not with POA. For CP3, MALS was associated with increased MC risk (OR 1.441, 95%CI:1.10-1.88, p:0.008). Low-volume centers had significantly higher MC risks after CP2 and CP3 procedures than medium or high-volume centers.

Conclusion: In CP1 and CP2 procedures, MALS was proven advantageous in reducing POA and MC. Among CP3, MALS increased the risk of MC, but not among high-volume centres.

背景:最小通路肝手术(MALS)被认为在降低肝细胞癌(HCC)患者围手术期风险方面优于开放肝切除术(OLR)。不存在基于程序复杂性的国家一级比较。本研究旨在比较MALS和OLR的术后并发症、术后腹水(POA)和主要并发症(MC)。方法:数据来源于意大利HE。RC.O.LE.S。注册表。将患者分为OLR组和MALS组,并按复杂程度(CP1、CP2、CP3)进行分层。执行逆概率加权(IPW)以确保平衡比较。结果:2008年至2021年,纳入4738例患者:1596例(33.7%)行MALS, 3142例(66.3%)行OLR。CP1 2522例(53.2%),CP2 974例(20.5%),CP3 1242例(26.2%)。对于CP1, MALS与POA降低相关(OR 0.356, 95%CI:0.29-0.43, p)结论:在CP1和CP2手术中,MALS被证明有利于降低POA和MC。在CP3中,MALS增加了MC的风险,但在高容量中心中没有。
{"title":"Laparoscopic versus open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma according to the procedure's complexity: real-world weighted data from a national register.","authors":"Simone Famularo, Flavio Milana, Francesco Ardito, Federica Cipriani, Alessandro Vitale, Andrea Lauterio, Matteo Serenari, Andrea Fontana, Daniele Nicolini, Mario Giuffrida, Mattia Garancini, Tommaso Dominioni, Matteo Zanello, Pasquale Perri, Quirino Lai, Simone Conci, Sarah Molfino, Mariano Giglio, Giuliano LaBarba, Cecilia Ferrari, Maria Conticchio, Paola Germani, Maurizio Romano, Stefan Patauner, Andrea Belli, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Adelmo Antonucci, Luca Fumagalli, Albert Troci, Michela De Angelis, Luigi Boccia, Michele Crespi, Moh'd A Hilal, Francesco Izzo, Antonio Frena, Giacomo Zanus, Paola Tarchi, Riccardo Memeo, Guido Griseri, Giorgio Ercolani, Roberto Troisi, Gian L Baiocchi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Massimo Rossi, Gian L Grazi, Elio Jovine, Marcello Maestri, Fabrizio Romano, Raffaele D Valle, Marco Vivarelli, Alessandro Ferrero, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Umberto Cillo, Luca Aldrighetti, Felice Giuliante, Guido Torzilli","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimal access liver surgery (MALS) is considered superior to open liver resection (OLR) in reducing the perioperative risk in patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No national-level comparisons exist based on procedure complexity. This study aims to compare postoperative complications, postoperative ascites (POA), and major complications (MC) between MALS and OLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrieved from the Italian HE. RC.O.LE.S. registry. Patients were categorized into OLR or MALS groups and stratified by complexity grade (CP1, CP2, CP3). An inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to ensure balanced comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2008 to 2021, 4738 patients were included: 1596 (33.7 %) underwent MALS, and 3142 (66.3 %) underwent OLR. CP1 procedures were conducted in 2522 cases (53.2 %), CP2 in 974 cases (20.5 %), and CP3 in 1242 cases (26.2 %). For CP1, MALS was associated with reduced POA (OR 0.356, 95%CI:0.29-0.43, p < 0.001), and MC (OR 0.738, 95%CI:0.59-0.91, p: 0.006). In CP2, MALS showed association with MC (OR 0.557, 95%CI:0.37-0.82, p:0.004), but not with POA. For CP3, MALS was associated with increased MC risk (OR 1.441, 95%CI:1.10-1.88, p:0.008). Low-volume centers had significantly higher MC risks after CP2 and CP3 procedures than medium or high-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In CP1 and CP2 procedures, MALS was proven advantageous in reducing POA and MC. Among CP3, MALS increased the risk of MC, but not among high-volume centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcription enhanced associate domain factor 1 (TEAD1) predicts liver regeneration outcome of ALPPS-treated patients.
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.007
Mirco Küchler, Mareike Ehmke, Kai Jaquet, Peter Wohlmuth, Johannes M Feldhege, Tim Reese, Thilo Hartmann, Richard Drexler, Tessa Huber, Thorsten Burmester, Karl J Oldhafer

Background: The two-stage surgical technique of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) enables extensive liver resection and promotes future liver remnant regeneration (FLR), in part by inhibiting the Hippo signalling pathway. Its main effector, Yes-associated protein (YAP), has low intrinsic transcriptional activity and requires the transcription enhanced associated domain factor (TEAD) family members as cofactors for target gene transcription. We evaluated the intracellular localization and expression of TEAD1-4, hypothesized to regulate the activity of YAP and, consequently, liver regeneration.

Methods: The intracellular localization of TEAD1-4 was characterized in tumor-free liver (TFL) tissue samples from 44 ALPPS patients obtained during the two stages of ALPPS surgery. Expression levels were correlated with clinical and pathological data as well as liver regeneration metrics.

Results: TEAD family members are simultaneously expressed in individual hepatocytes and show relations with liver regeneration, clinical outcome and outcome parameters when comparing TFL tissue obtained at different stages of ALPPS surgery. Furthermore, differences in TEAD expression and localization within hepatocytes appeared to be independent of global factors.

Conclusion: TEAD1-4 expression correlates with liver regeneration outcomes. Specifically, cytoplasmic and nuclear expression scores of TEAD1 serve as predictive markers for clinical outcomes following ALPPS.

{"title":"Transcription enhanced associate domain factor 1 (TEAD1) predicts liver regeneration outcome of ALPPS-treated patients.","authors":"Mirco Küchler, Mareike Ehmke, Kai Jaquet, Peter Wohlmuth, Johannes M Feldhege, Tim Reese, Thilo Hartmann, Richard Drexler, Tessa Huber, Thorsten Burmester, Karl J Oldhafer","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The two-stage surgical technique of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) enables extensive liver resection and promotes future liver remnant regeneration (FLR), in part by inhibiting the Hippo signalling pathway. Its main effector, Yes-associated protein (YAP), has low intrinsic transcriptional activity and requires the transcription enhanced associated domain factor (TEAD) family members as cofactors for target gene transcription. We evaluated the intracellular localization and expression of TEAD1-4, hypothesized to regulate the activity of YAP and, consequently, liver regeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intracellular localization of TEAD1-4 was characterized in tumor-free liver (TFL) tissue samples from 44 ALPPS patients obtained during the two stages of ALPPS surgery. Expression levels were correlated with clinical and pathological data as well as liver regeneration metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TEAD family members are simultaneously expressed in individual hepatocytes and show relations with liver regeneration, clinical outcome and outcome parameters when comparing TFL tissue obtained at different stages of ALPPS surgery. Furthermore, differences in TEAD expression and localization within hepatocytes appeared to be independent of global factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TEAD1-4 expression correlates with liver regeneration outcomes. Specifically, cytoplasmic and nuclear expression scores of TEAD1 serve as predictive markers for clinical outcomes following ALPPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143052370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethics and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary surgery: a snapshot of insights from the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) survey. 人工智能在肝胆外科手术中的伦理和可信度:来自欧洲-非洲肝胆协会(E-AHPBA)调查的见解快照。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.016
Niki Rashidian, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Isabella Frigerio, Martina Guerra, Sigrid Sterckx, Francesca Tozzi, Giulia Capelli, Daunia Verdi, Gaya Spolverato, Aiste Gulla, Francesca Ratti, Andrew J Healey, Alessandro Esposito, Matteo De Pastena, Andrea Belli, Stefan A Bouwense, Angelakoudis Apostolos, Sven A Lang, Victor López-López, Gregor S Alexander, Luca Aldrighetti, Oliver Strobel, Roland Croner, Andrew A Gumbs

Background: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery is a complex specialty and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications have the potential to improve pre- intra- and postoperative outcomes of HPB surgery. While ethics guidelines have been developed for the use of AI in clinical surgery, the ethical implications and reliability of AI in HPB surgery remain specifically unexplored.

Methods: An online survey was developed by the Innovation Committee of the E-AHPBA to investigate the current perspectives on the ethical principles and trustworthiness of AI in HPB Surgery among E-AHPBA membership. The survey consisted of 22 questions, based on guidelines outlined by the Artificial Intelligence Surgery Journal Task Force on AI Ethics in clinical surgery and was disseminated via email to all E-AHPBA members.

Results: A total of 84 members of the E-AHPBA participated in the survey. Seventeen out of 22 questions achieved more than 80 % agreement, with nine of those exceeding 90 %. Five questions had agreement levels between 70 % and 80 %.

Conclusion: While HPB surgeons are aware of the need to regulate the use of AI devices, robots, and to protect patient data, consensus appears to be heterogeneous regarding AI's role in mitigating gender-related and minority biases, as well as ensuring fairness and equity.

背景:肝胰胆(HPB)手术是一个复杂的专科,人工智能(AI)的应用有可能改善HPB手术的术前、术中和术后预后。虽然已经制定了在临床手术中使用人工智能的伦理准则,但人工智能在HPB手术中的伦理意义和可靠性仍未得到特别的探索。方法:E-AHPBA创新委员会开展了一项在线调查,调查E-AHPBA成员对HPB手术中人工智能的伦理原则和可信度的看法。该调查由22个问题组成,基于人工智能外科杂志临床手术人工智能伦理工作组概述的指导方针,并通过电子邮件发送给所有E-AHPBA成员。结果:共有84名E-AHPBA会员参与了调查。22个问题中有17个达到了80%以上的一致性,其中9个超过了90%。有5个问题的同意程度在70%到80%之间。结论:虽然HPB外科医生意识到有必要规范人工智能设备、机器人的使用,并保护患者数据,但在人工智能在减轻与性别相关的偏见和少数群体偏见以及确保公平和公正方面的作用方面,共识似乎是不一致的。
{"title":"Ethics and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary surgery: a snapshot of insights from the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) survey.","authors":"Niki Rashidian, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Isabella Frigerio, Martina Guerra, Sigrid Sterckx, Francesca Tozzi, Giulia Capelli, Daunia Verdi, Gaya Spolverato, Aiste Gulla, Francesca Ratti, Andrew J Healey, Alessandro Esposito, Matteo De Pastena, Andrea Belli, Stefan A Bouwense, Angelakoudis Apostolos, Sven A Lang, Victor López-López, Gregor S Alexander, Luca Aldrighetti, Oliver Strobel, Roland Croner, Andrew A Gumbs","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery is a complex specialty and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications have the potential to improve pre- intra- and postoperative outcomes of HPB surgery. While ethics guidelines have been developed for the use of AI in clinical surgery, the ethical implications and reliability of AI in HPB surgery remain specifically unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was developed by the Innovation Committee of the E-AHPBA to investigate the current perspectives on the ethical principles and trustworthiness of AI in HPB Surgery among E-AHPBA membership. The survey consisted of 22 questions, based on guidelines outlined by the Artificial Intelligence Surgery Journal Task Force on AI Ethics in clinical surgery and was disseminated via email to all E-AHPBA members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 84 members of the E-AHPBA participated in the survey. Seventeen out of 22 questions achieved more than 80 % agreement, with nine of those exceeding 90 %. Five questions had agreement levels between 70 % and 80 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HPB surgeons are aware of the need to regulate the use of AI devices, robots, and to protect patient data, consensus appears to be heterogeneous regarding AI's role in mitigating gender-related and minority biases, as well as ensuring fairness and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machine learning based prediction model for bile leak following hepatectomy for liver cancer. 基于机器学习的肝癌肝切除术后胆漏预测模型。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.015
Abdullah Altaf, Muhammad M Munir, Muhammad Muntazir M Khan, Zayed Rashid, Mujtaba Khalil, Alfredo Guglielmi, Francesca Ratti, Luca Aldrighetti, Todd W Bauer, Hugo P Marques, Guillaume Martel, Sorin Alexandrescu, Matthew J Weiss, Minoru Kitago, George Poultsides, Shishir K Maithel, Carlo Pulitano, Vincent Lam, Irinel Popescu, Ana Gleisner, Tom Hugh, Feng Shen, François Cauchy, Bas G Koerkamp, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik

Objective: We sought to develop a machine learning (ML) preoperative model to predict bile leak following hepatectomy for primary and secondary liver cancer.

Methods: An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to predict post-hepatectomy bile leak using data from the ACS-NSQIP database. The model was externally validated using data from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) multi-institutional databases.

Results: Overall, 20,570 and 2253 patients were identified from the ACS-NSQIP and multi-institutional databases, respectively. The incidence rates of bile leak were 7.0 %, 6.3 % and 10.2 % in the ACS-NSQIP, HCC and ICC databases, respectively. The XGBoost model achieved areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of 0.748, 0.719 and 0.711 in the training, testing and external validation cohorts, respectively. The SHAP algorithm demonstrated that the factors most strongly predictive of postoperative bile leak were serum alkaline phosphatase, surgical approach and cancer diagnosis. An online tool was developed for ease-of-use and clinical applicability (https://altaf-pawlik-bileleak-calculator.streamlit.app/).

Conclusion: A novel ML model demonstrated strong discrimination power to preoperatively identify patients at high risk of developing bile leak post-hepatectomy. The online calculator may be used as a clinical tool to inform preoperative surgical planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative recovery protocols for patients undergoing hepatectomy.

目的:我们试图开发一种机器学习(ML)术前模型来预测原发性和继发性肝癌肝切除术后的胆汁泄漏。方法:利用ACS-NSQIP数据库的数据,建立了一个极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型来预测肝切除术后胆汁泄漏。该模型使用来自肝细胞癌(HCC)和肝内胆管癌(ICC)多机构数据库的数据进行外部验证。结果:总体而言,分别从ACS-NSQIP和多机构数据库中确定了20,570和2253例患者。在ACS-NSQIP、HCC和ICC数据库中,胆漏发生率分别为7.0%、6.3%和10.2%。XGBoost模型在训练组、测试组和外部验证组的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分别为0.748、0.719和0.711。SHAP算法显示,血清碱性磷酸酶、手术入路和肿瘤诊断是预测术后胆漏最有效的因素。为了便于使用和临床应用,开发了一个在线工具(https://altaf-pawlik-bileleak-calculator.streamlit.app/)。结论:一种新的ML模型对术前识别肝切除术后发生胆漏的高危患者具有较强的鉴别能力。在线计算器可作为临床工具,为肝切除术患者提供术前手术计划、术中决策和术后恢复方案的信息。
{"title":"Machine learning based prediction model for bile leak following hepatectomy for liver cancer.","authors":"Abdullah Altaf, Muhammad M Munir, Muhammad Muntazir M Khan, Zayed Rashid, Mujtaba Khalil, Alfredo Guglielmi, Francesca Ratti, Luca Aldrighetti, Todd W Bauer, Hugo P Marques, Guillaume Martel, Sorin Alexandrescu, Matthew J Weiss, Minoru Kitago, George Poultsides, Shishir K Maithel, Carlo Pulitano, Vincent Lam, Irinel Popescu, Ana Gleisner, Tom Hugh, Feng Shen, François Cauchy, Bas G Koerkamp, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to develop a machine learning (ML) preoperative model to predict bile leak following hepatectomy for primary and secondary liver cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to predict post-hepatectomy bile leak using data from the ACS-NSQIP database. The model was externally validated using data from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) multi-institutional databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 20,570 and 2253 patients were identified from the ACS-NSQIP and multi-institutional databases, respectively. The incidence rates of bile leak were 7.0 %, 6.3 % and 10.2 % in the ACS-NSQIP, HCC and ICC databases, respectively. The XGBoost model achieved areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of 0.748, 0.719 and 0.711 in the training, testing and external validation cohorts, respectively. The SHAP algorithm demonstrated that the factors most strongly predictive of postoperative bile leak were serum alkaline phosphatase, surgical approach and cancer diagnosis. An online tool was developed for ease-of-use and clinical applicability (https://altaf-pawlik-bileleak-calculator.streamlit.app/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A novel ML model demonstrated strong discrimination power to preoperatively identify patients at high risk of developing bile leak post-hepatectomy. The online calculator may be used as a clinical tool to inform preoperative surgical planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative recovery protocols for patients undergoing hepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machine learning to predict the decision to perform surgery in hepatic echinococcosis. 机器学习预测肝包虫病手术的决定。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.014
Raffaella Lissandrin, Ottavia Cicerone, Ambra Vola, Gianluca D'Alessandro, Simone Frassini, Tommaso Manciulli, Simone Famularo, Annalisa De Silvestri, Jacopo Viganò, Pietro Quaretti, Luca Ansaloni, Enrico Brunetti, Marcello Maestri

Background: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a significant public health issue, primarily affecting the liver. While several management strategies exist, there is a lack of predictive tools to guide surgical decisions for hepatic CE. This study aimed to develop predictive models to support surgical decision-making in hepatic CE, enhancing the precision of patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical management pathways.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 406 hepatic CE patients treated at our center (2009-2021). Clinical, imaging, and treatment data were used to develop a Cox regression and a decision tree model to identify factors influencing surgical intervention, with model performance validated using K-fold cross-validation, train/test split, bootstrapping.

Results: Imaging findings and symptomatology emerged as the most significant predictors. The Cox model demonstrated a concordance index of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.96, while the decision tree model identified imaging, cyst stage, and symptoms as critical factors, achieving strong performance across validation techniques (mean AUC 0.950; 95% CI: [0.889, 0.978]).

Conclusion: This study presents validated predictive models for assessing surgical risk in hepatic CE. Integrating these models into clinical practice offers a dynamic tool that surpasses static guidelines, optimizing patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical pathways and potentially improving outcomes.

背景:囊性包虫病(CE)是一个重要的公共卫生问题,主要影响肝脏。虽然存在几种管理策略,但缺乏预测工具来指导肝CE的手术决策。本研究旨在建立预测模型,以支持肝CE的手术决策,提高患者分配到手术或非手术治疗途径的准确性。方法:回顾性分析本中心2009-2021年收治的406例肝CE患者。临床、影像学和治疗数据用于建立Cox回归和决策树模型,以确定影响手术干预的因素,并使用K-fold交叉验证、训练/测试分割和自举来验证模型的性能。结果:影像学表现和症状学是最重要的预测因素。Cox模型的一致性指数为0.94,AUC为0.96,而决策树模型将影像学、囊肿分期和症状确定为关键因素,在验证技术中表现出色(平均AUC为0.950;95% ci:[0.889, 0.978])。结论:本研究提出了评估肝CE手术风险的有效预测模型。将这些模型整合到临床实践中,提供了一种超越静态指南的动态工具,优化了手术或非手术途径的患者分配,并有可能改善结果。
{"title":"Machine learning to predict the decision to perform surgery in hepatic echinococcosis.","authors":"Raffaella Lissandrin, Ottavia Cicerone, Ambra Vola, Gianluca D'Alessandro, Simone Frassini, Tommaso Manciulli, Simone Famularo, Annalisa De Silvestri, Jacopo Viganò, Pietro Quaretti, Luca Ansaloni, Enrico Brunetti, Marcello Maestri","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a significant public health issue, primarily affecting the liver. While several management strategies exist, there is a lack of predictive tools to guide surgical decisions for hepatic CE. This study aimed to develop predictive models to support surgical decision-making in hepatic CE, enhancing the precision of patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical management pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 406 hepatic CE patients treated at our center (2009-2021). Clinical, imaging, and treatment data were used to develop a Cox regression and a decision tree model to identify factors influencing surgical intervention, with model performance validated using K-fold cross-validation, train/test split, bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Imaging findings and symptomatology emerged as the most significant predictors. The Cox model demonstrated a concordance index of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.96, while the decision tree model identified imaging, cyst stage, and symptoms as critical factors, achieving strong performance across validation techniques (mean AUC 0.950; 95% CI: [0.889, 0.978]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents validated predictive models for assessing surgical risk in hepatic CE. Integrating these models into clinical practice offers a dynamic tool that surpasses static guidelines, optimizing patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical pathways and potentially improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patterns, timing and predictors of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicentre retrospective cohort study.
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.015
Peter L Z Labib, Thomas B Russell, Jemimah L Denson, Mark A Puckett, Fabio Ausania, Elizabeth Pando, Keith J Roberts, Ambareen Kausar, Vasileios K Mavroeidis, Ricky H Bhogal, Gabriele Marangoni, Sarah C Thomasset, Adam E Frampton, Duncan R Spalding, Pavlos Lykoudis, Manuel Maglione, Nassir Alhaboob, Parthi Srinivasan, Hassaan Bari, Andrew Smith, Ismael Dominguez-Rosado, Daniel Croagh, Rohan G Thakkar, Dhanny Gomez, Michael A Silva, Pierfrancesco Lapolla, Andrea Mingoli, Brian R Davidson, Alberto Porcu, Nehal S Shah, Zaed Z Hamady, Bilal A Al-Sarireh, Alejandro Serrablo, Somaiah Aroori

Background: Most patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) develop recurrence. No previous studies have investigated predictors of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC. Our study aimed to determine timing, pattern and predictors of any-site and local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.

Methods: Patients who underwent PD for PDAC between June 2012 and May 2015 (29 centres, eight countries) were included. The primary outcome was recurrence pattern (none, local-only, distant-only or mixed local/distant). Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, investigations, operation details, complications, histology, adjuvant therapies, recurrence and survival. Univariable tests and regression analysis investigated factors associated with any-site and local-only recurrence.

Results: Of 866 patients, 573 (66 %) developed recurrence: 170 (20 %) developed local-only recurrence, 164 (19 %) developed mixed local/distant recurrence, and 239 (28 %) developed distant-only recurrence. Local-only or lung-only recurrence had a more favourable prognosis than other recurrence patterns. Predictors of any-site recurrence were preoperative biliary stenting, venous resection and poorly-differentiated, node-positive tumours. Predictors of local-only recurrence were preoperative radiological lymphadenopathy, well-differentiated tumours, fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes and intraoperative blood transfusion.

Discussion: Ensuring radical resection and avoiding intraoperative blood transfusion may reduce the risk of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.

{"title":"Patterns, timing and predictors of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicentre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Peter L Z Labib, Thomas B Russell, Jemimah L Denson, Mark A Puckett, Fabio Ausania, Elizabeth Pando, Keith J Roberts, Ambareen Kausar, Vasileios K Mavroeidis, Ricky H Bhogal, Gabriele Marangoni, Sarah C Thomasset, Adam E Frampton, Duncan R Spalding, Pavlos Lykoudis, Manuel Maglione, Nassir Alhaboob, Parthi Srinivasan, Hassaan Bari, Andrew Smith, Ismael Dominguez-Rosado, Daniel Croagh, Rohan G Thakkar, Dhanny Gomez, Michael A Silva, Pierfrancesco Lapolla, Andrea Mingoli, Brian R Davidson, Alberto Porcu, Nehal S Shah, Zaed Z Hamady, Bilal A Al-Sarireh, Alejandro Serrablo, Somaiah Aroori","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) develop recurrence. No previous studies have investigated predictors of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC. Our study aimed to determine timing, pattern and predictors of any-site and local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent PD for PDAC between June 2012 and May 2015 (29 centres, eight countries) were included. The primary outcome was recurrence pattern (none, local-only, distant-only or mixed local/distant). Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, investigations, operation details, complications, histology, adjuvant therapies, recurrence and survival. Univariable tests and regression analysis investigated factors associated with any-site and local-only recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 866 patients, 573 (66 %) developed recurrence: 170 (20 %) developed local-only recurrence, 164 (19 %) developed mixed local/distant recurrence, and 239 (28 %) developed distant-only recurrence. Local-only or lung-only recurrence had a more favourable prognosis than other recurrence patterns. Predictors of any-site recurrence were preoperative biliary stenting, venous resection and poorly-differentiated, node-positive tumours. Predictors of local-only recurrence were preoperative radiological lymphadenopathy, well-differentiated tumours, fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes and intraoperative blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ensuring radical resection and avoiding intraoperative blood transfusion may reduce the risk of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143052369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incisional hernia after major pancreatic resection: long term risk assessment from two distinct sources – A large multi-institutional network and a single high-volume center 胰腺大部切除术后的切口疝:来自两个不同来源的长期风险评估--一个大型多机构网络和一个单一高容量中心
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.009
Nitzan Zohar, Eliyahu Gorgov, Theresa P. Yeo, Harish Lavu, Wilbur Bowne, Charles J. Yeo, Avinoam Nevler

Background

Post-operative incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication following abdominal surgery. Data regarding IH after major pancreatic surgery are limited. We aim to evaluate the long-term risk of IH following major pancreatic resection.

Methods

A dual-approach study: a large multi-institutional research network (RN) was investigated for IH incidence and risk factors in propensity-score matched survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), was complemented by a patient-reported questionnaire.

Results

RN analysis identified 22,113 patients that underwent pancreatic surgery. 11.0% of PD patients and 8.6% of DP patients developed IH (P < 0.0001). IH rates were higher with open surgery compared with minimally invasive approaches in PD (OR = 1.56, P = 0.03) and DP (OR = 1.94, P = 0.003). BMI>35 was found to correlate with increased IH rates for PD and DP (OR = 1.87, and OR = 1.86, respectively, P < 0.0001 each), as did postoperative intraabdominal infections (P < 0.0001). Patient-based survey of 104 patients, revealed that 16 patients (15%) reported post-operative IH during the follow-up period. BMI≥30, SSI and intra-abdominal abscesses were associated with increased IH risk (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Improved survival after pancreatic resection has led to an increased prevalence of long-term surgical sequela. In this study, we demonstrate significant rates of IH among long-term survivors and assess potential risk factors.
术后切口疝(IH)是腹部手术后常见的并发症。有关胰腺大手术后切口疝的数据非常有限。我们旨在评估大胰腺切除术后 IH 的长期风险。我们开展了一项双途径研究:在一个大型多机构研究网络(RN)中调查了胰十二指肠切除术(PD)和远端胰切除术(DP)后倾向分数匹配的幸存者的 IH 发生率和风险因素,并对胰腺手术幸存者群组进行了患者报告问卷调查,以评估 IH 发生率。RN分析确定了22113名接受过胰腺手术的患者,并创建了7092对匹配的胰腺切除术和胰腺切除术患者(随访时间大于1年)。11.0%的胰腺癌患者和8.6%的直肠癌患者发生了IH(P 35与胰腺癌和直肠癌的IH发生率增加相关(OR=1.87和OR=1.86,P均<0.0001)),术后腹腔内感染和吻合口漏也与IH发生率增加相关(OR=1.53和OR=1.59,P均<0.0001)。对 104 名患者进行的患者调查显示,16 名患者(15%)在随访期间报告了术后 IH。BMI≥30、SSI和腹腔内脓肿与IH风险增加有关(P<0.05)。胰腺切除术后生存率的提高导致长期手术后遗症的发生率增加。在这项研究中,我们证明了长期幸存者中 IH 的显著发生率,并评估了潜在的风险因素。
{"title":"Incisional hernia after major pancreatic resection: long term risk assessment from two distinct sources – A large multi-institutional network and a single high-volume center","authors":"Nitzan Zohar,&nbsp;Eliyahu Gorgov,&nbsp;Theresa P. Yeo,&nbsp;Harish Lavu,&nbsp;Wilbur Bowne,&nbsp;Charles J. Yeo,&nbsp;Avinoam Nevler","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-operative incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication following abdominal surgery. Data regarding IH after major pancreatic surgery are limited. We aim to evaluate the long-term risk of IH following major pancreatic resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A dual-approach study: a large multi-institutional research network (RN) was investigated for IH incidence and risk factors in propensity-score matched survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), was complemented by a patient-reported questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>RN analysis identified 22,113 patients that underwent pancreatic surgery. 11.0% of PD patients and 8.6% of DP patients developed IH (P &lt; 0.0001). IH rates were higher with open surgery compared with minimally invasive approaches in PD (OR = 1.56, P = 0.03) and DP (OR = 1.94, P = 0.003). BMI&gt;35 was found to correlate with increased IH rates for PD and DP (OR = 1.87, and OR = 1.86, respectively, P &lt; 0.0001 each), as did postoperative intraabdominal infections (P &lt; 0.0001). Patient-based survey of 104 patients, revealed that 16 patients (15%) reported post-operative IH during the follow-up period. BMI≥30, SSI and intra-abdominal abscesses were associated with increased IH risk (P &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Improved survival after pancreatic resection has led to an increased prevalence of long-term surgical sequela. In this study, we demonstrate significant rates of IH among long-term survivors and assess potential risk factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"26 12","pages":"Pages 1487-1494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142180083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hpb
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1