Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.008
Anouk M.L.H. Emmen , Leia R. Jones , Kongyuan Wei , Olivier Busch , Baiyong Shen , Giuseppe K. Fusai , Yi-Ming Shyr , Igor Khatkov , Steve White , Ugo Boggi , Mustafa Kerem , I.Q. Molenaar , Bas G. Koerkamp , Olivier Saint-Marc , Safi Dokmak , Susan van Dieren , Renzo Rozzini , Sebastiaan Festen , Rong Liu , Jin-Young Jang , Mohammed A. Hilal
Background
Pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients may be associated with increased postoperative mortality, but studies in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) are scarce.
Methods
International multicenter retrospective study including patients aged >60 years undergoing MIPD (robot-assisted and laparoscopic) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD), were categorized by age: 60–69, 70–79, and 80+ years. In each category, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (1:1 ratio) between MIPD and OPD. Primary outcome was 30-day/in-hospital mortality.
Results
Among 3820 patients, we matched 1468 patients aged 60–69, 1154 patients aged 70–79, and 196 patients aged 80+ years. In patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years, MIPD was associated with longer operative time, less blood loss and a longer length of stay. Major morbidity was higher after MIPD with similar 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The R0 resection rate was higher after MIPD. In patients aged 80+ years, besides a longer operative time in MIPD, outcomes were comparable between both groups.
Conclusion
This study found no evidence that increasing age worsens mortality of MIPD. MIPD was associated with longer operative time, higher rate of major morbidity, prolonged length of stay versus less blood loss and a higher R0 resection in patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years. These differences continue in patients aged 80+ years, but became less evident.
{"title":"Impact of patient age on outcome of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched study","authors":"Anouk M.L.H. Emmen , Leia R. Jones , Kongyuan Wei , Olivier Busch , Baiyong Shen , Giuseppe K. Fusai , Yi-Ming Shyr , Igor Khatkov , Steve White , Ugo Boggi , Mustafa Kerem , I.Q. Molenaar , Bas G. Koerkamp , Olivier Saint-Marc , Safi Dokmak , Susan van Dieren , Renzo Rozzini , Sebastiaan Festen , Rong Liu , Jin-Young Jang , Mohammed A. Hilal","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients may be associated with increased postoperative mortality, but studies in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) are scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>International multicenter retrospective study including patients aged >60 years undergoing MIPD (robot-assisted and laparoscopic) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD), were categorized by age: 60–69, 70–79, and 80+ years. In each category, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (1:1 ratio) between MIPD and OPD. Primary outcome was 30-day/in-hospital mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3820 patients, we matched 1468 patients aged 60–69, 1154 patients aged 70–79, and 196 patients aged 80+ years. In patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years, MIPD was associated with longer operative time, less blood loss and a longer length of stay. Major morbidity was higher after MIPD with similar 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The R0 resection rate was higher after MIPD. In patients aged 80+ years, besides a longer operative time in MIPD, outcomes were comparable between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found no evidence that increasing age worsens mortality of MIPD. MIPD was associated with longer operative time, higher rate of major morbidity, prolonged length of stay versus less blood loss and a higher R0 resection in patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years. These differences continue in patients aged 80+ years, but became less evident.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142582959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-30DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.018
Montserrat Chavez, Xabier de Aretxabala, Hector Losada, Norberto Portillo, Felipe Castillo, Luis Bustos, Ivan Roa
Background: Although the prognosis for gallbladder cancer (GBCA) improves with early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment, the management of patients with muscle layer invasion (T1b) remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the optimal surgical approach for these patients.
Methods: A database was queried for patients with early T1b GBCA treated at four Chilean hospitals. Patients were prospectively treated and registered by the same surgical team at each hospital. Clinical outcomes, including survival rates according to the type of surgery, were analyzed.
Results: Between 1988 and 2023, 129 Chilean patients were pathologically diagnosed with T1b GBCA. Simple cholecystectomy (SC) was performed in 86 patients (66.7 %), while extended cholecystectomy (EC) was performed in 43 patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83 %, with no significant difference between SC and EC patients.
Conclusion: Simple cholecystectomy demonstrated survival rates comparable to extended cholecystectomy for patients with T1b GBCA. More extensive resections did not improve the prognosis.
{"title":"T1b gallbladder cancer: is extended resection warranted?","authors":"Montserrat Chavez, Xabier de Aretxabala, Hector Losada, Norberto Portillo, Felipe Castillo, Luis Bustos, Ivan Roa","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the prognosis for gallbladder cancer (GBCA) improves with early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment, the management of patients with muscle layer invasion (T1b) remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the optimal surgical approach for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database was queried for patients with early T1b GBCA treated at four Chilean hospitals. Patients were prospectively treated and registered by the same surgical team at each hospital. Clinical outcomes, including survival rates according to the type of surgery, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1988 and 2023, 129 Chilean patients were pathologically diagnosed with T1b GBCA. Simple cholecystectomy (SC) was performed in 86 patients (66.7 %), while extended cholecystectomy (EC) was performed in 43 patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83 %, with no significant difference between SC and EC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simple cholecystectomy demonstrated survival rates comparable to extended cholecystectomy for patients with T1b GBCA. More extensive resections did not improve the prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-30DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.020
Sandra de Kalbermatten, David Martin, Emilie Uldry, Emmanuel Melloul, Nicolas Demartines, David Fuks, Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols decrease postoperative complications, but data on their effect on diabetic patients undergoing pancreatectomy are scarce. This study assessed whether diabetes mellitus (DM) was a morbidity predictor after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program.
Methods: A cross-sectional study including all patients who underwent pancreatectomy (2012-2022) and followed an ERAS pathway was performed. Multivariable analysis was used to determine whether DM was a morbidity predictor. Association between ERAS compliance and morbidity rate was assessed.
Results: A total of 558 patients were included (266 women, median age 66, median body-mass index 25). Most patients underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy (n=369, 66%). In diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance≤60 %, morbidity was 38/40 (95%), whereas in diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance>60 %, it decreased to 37/50 (74%, p=0.008). DM was not found as an independent complication predictor (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.4-1.2, p=0.186), while body-mass index>25 kg/m2 and preoperative biliary stenting were preoperative morbidity predictors (OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.1, p=0.049; OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.5, p=0.044).
Conclusion: This study showed that DM was not associated with postoperative complications after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program. It highlighted the importance of a good ERAS compliance to decrease the risk of postoperative complications in DM patients.
{"title":"Impact of diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.","authors":"Sandra de Kalbermatten, David Martin, Emilie Uldry, Emmanuel Melloul, Nicolas Demartines, David Fuks, Gaëtan-Romain Joliat","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols decrease postoperative complications, but data on their effect on diabetic patients undergoing pancreatectomy are scarce. This study assessed whether diabetes mellitus (DM) was a morbidity predictor after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study including all patients who underwent pancreatectomy (2012-2022) and followed an ERAS pathway was performed. Multivariable analysis was used to determine whether DM was a morbidity predictor. Association between ERAS compliance and morbidity rate was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 558 patients were included (266 women, median age 66, median body-mass index 25). Most patients underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy (n=369, 66%). In diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance≤60 %, morbidity was 38/40 (95%), whereas in diabetic patients with overall ERAS compliance>60 %, it decreased to 37/50 (74%, p=0.008). DM was not found as an independent complication predictor (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.4-1.2, p=0.186), while body-mass index>25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and preoperative biliary stenting were preoperative morbidity predictors (OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.1, p=0.049; OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.5, p=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that DM was not associated with postoperative complications after pancreatectomy within an ERAS program. It highlighted the importance of a good ERAS compliance to decrease the risk of postoperative complications in DM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-28DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.017
Simone Famularo, Flavio Milana, Francesco Ardito, Federica Cipriani, Alessandro Vitale, Andrea Lauterio, Matteo Serenari, Andrea Fontana, Daniele Nicolini, Mario Giuffrida, Mattia Garancini, Tommaso Dominioni, Matteo Zanello, Pasquale Perri, Quirino Lai, Simone Conci, Sarah Molfino, Mariano Giglio, Giuliano LaBarba, Cecilia Ferrari, Maria Conticchio, Paola Germani, Maurizio Romano, Stefan Patauner, Andrea Belli, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Adelmo Antonucci, Luca Fumagalli, Albert Troci, Michela De Angelis, Luigi Boccia, Michele Crespi, Moh'd A Hilal, Francesco Izzo, Antonio Frena, Giacomo Zanus, Paola Tarchi, Riccardo Memeo, Guido Griseri, Giorgio Ercolani, Roberto Troisi, Gian L Baiocchi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Massimo Rossi, Gian L Grazi, Elio Jovine, Marcello Maestri, Fabrizio Romano, Raffaele D Valle, Marco Vivarelli, Alessandro Ferrero, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Umberto Cillo, Luca Aldrighetti, Felice Giuliante, Guido Torzilli
Background: Minimal access liver surgery (MALS) is considered superior to open liver resection (OLR) in reducing the perioperative risk in patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No national-level comparisons exist based on procedure complexity. This study aims to compare postoperative complications, postoperative ascites (POA), and major complications (MC) between MALS and OLR.
Methods: Data were retrieved from the Italian HE. RC.O.LE.S. registry. Patients were categorized into OLR or MALS groups and stratified by complexity grade (CP1, CP2, CP3). An inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to ensure balanced comparisons.
Results: From 2008 to 2021, 4738 patients were included: 1596 (33.7 %) underwent MALS, and 3142 (66.3 %) underwent OLR. CP1 procedures were conducted in 2522 cases (53.2 %), CP2 in 974 cases (20.5 %), and CP3 in 1242 cases (26.2 %). For CP1, MALS was associated with reduced POA (OR 0.356, 95%CI:0.29-0.43, p < 0.001), and MC (OR 0.738, 95%CI:0.59-0.91, p: 0.006). In CP2, MALS showed association with MC (OR 0.557, 95%CI:0.37-0.82, p:0.004), but not with POA. For CP3, MALS was associated with increased MC risk (OR 1.441, 95%CI:1.10-1.88, p:0.008). Low-volume centers had significantly higher MC risks after CP2 and CP3 procedures than medium or high-volume centers.
Conclusion: In CP1 and CP2 procedures, MALS was proven advantageous in reducing POA and MC. Among CP3, MALS increased the risk of MC, but not among high-volume centres.
{"title":"Laparoscopic versus open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma according to the procedure's complexity: real-world weighted data from a national register.","authors":"Simone Famularo, Flavio Milana, Francesco Ardito, Federica Cipriani, Alessandro Vitale, Andrea Lauterio, Matteo Serenari, Andrea Fontana, Daniele Nicolini, Mario Giuffrida, Mattia Garancini, Tommaso Dominioni, Matteo Zanello, Pasquale Perri, Quirino Lai, Simone Conci, Sarah Molfino, Mariano Giglio, Giuliano LaBarba, Cecilia Ferrari, Maria Conticchio, Paola Germani, Maurizio Romano, Stefan Patauner, Andrea Belli, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Adelmo Antonucci, Luca Fumagalli, Albert Troci, Michela De Angelis, Luigi Boccia, Michele Crespi, Moh'd A Hilal, Francesco Izzo, Antonio Frena, Giacomo Zanus, Paola Tarchi, Riccardo Memeo, Guido Griseri, Giorgio Ercolani, Roberto Troisi, Gian L Baiocchi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Massimo Rossi, Gian L Grazi, Elio Jovine, Marcello Maestri, Fabrizio Romano, Raffaele D Valle, Marco Vivarelli, Alessandro Ferrero, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Umberto Cillo, Luca Aldrighetti, Felice Giuliante, Guido Torzilli","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimal access liver surgery (MALS) is considered superior to open liver resection (OLR) in reducing the perioperative risk in patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No national-level comparisons exist based on procedure complexity. This study aims to compare postoperative complications, postoperative ascites (POA), and major complications (MC) between MALS and OLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrieved from the Italian HE. RC.O.LE.S. registry. Patients were categorized into OLR or MALS groups and stratified by complexity grade (CP1, CP2, CP3). An inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to ensure balanced comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2008 to 2021, 4738 patients were included: 1596 (33.7 %) underwent MALS, and 3142 (66.3 %) underwent OLR. CP1 procedures were conducted in 2522 cases (53.2 %), CP2 in 974 cases (20.5 %), and CP3 in 1242 cases (26.2 %). For CP1, MALS was associated with reduced POA (OR 0.356, 95%CI:0.29-0.43, p < 0.001), and MC (OR 0.738, 95%CI:0.59-0.91, p: 0.006). In CP2, MALS showed association with MC (OR 0.557, 95%CI:0.37-0.82, p:0.004), but not with POA. For CP3, MALS was associated with increased MC risk (OR 1.441, 95%CI:1.10-1.88, p:0.008). Low-volume centers had significantly higher MC risks after CP2 and CP3 procedures than medium or high-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In CP1 and CP2 procedures, MALS was proven advantageous in reducing POA and MC. Among CP3, MALS increased the risk of MC, but not among high-volume centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-21DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.007
Mirco Küchler, Mareike Ehmke, Kai Jaquet, Peter Wohlmuth, Johannes M Feldhege, Tim Reese, Thilo Hartmann, Richard Drexler, Tessa Huber, Thorsten Burmester, Karl J Oldhafer
Background: The two-stage surgical technique of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) enables extensive liver resection and promotes future liver remnant regeneration (FLR), in part by inhibiting the Hippo signalling pathway. Its main effector, Yes-associated protein (YAP), has low intrinsic transcriptional activity and requires the transcription enhanced associated domain factor (TEAD) family members as cofactors for target gene transcription. We evaluated the intracellular localization and expression of TEAD1-4, hypothesized to regulate the activity of YAP and, consequently, liver regeneration.
Methods: The intracellular localization of TEAD1-4 was characterized in tumor-free liver (TFL) tissue samples from 44 ALPPS patients obtained during the two stages of ALPPS surgery. Expression levels were correlated with clinical and pathological data as well as liver regeneration metrics.
Results: TEAD family members are simultaneously expressed in individual hepatocytes and show relations with liver regeneration, clinical outcome and outcome parameters when comparing TFL tissue obtained at different stages of ALPPS surgery. Furthermore, differences in TEAD expression and localization within hepatocytes appeared to be independent of global factors.
Conclusion: TEAD1-4 expression correlates with liver regeneration outcomes. Specifically, cytoplasmic and nuclear expression scores of TEAD1 serve as predictive markers for clinical outcomes following ALPPS.
{"title":"Transcription enhanced associate domain factor 1 (TEAD1) predicts liver regeneration outcome of ALPPS-treated patients.","authors":"Mirco Küchler, Mareike Ehmke, Kai Jaquet, Peter Wohlmuth, Johannes M Feldhege, Tim Reese, Thilo Hartmann, Richard Drexler, Tessa Huber, Thorsten Burmester, Karl J Oldhafer","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The two-stage surgical technique of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) enables extensive liver resection and promotes future liver remnant regeneration (FLR), in part by inhibiting the Hippo signalling pathway. Its main effector, Yes-associated protein (YAP), has low intrinsic transcriptional activity and requires the transcription enhanced associated domain factor (TEAD) family members as cofactors for target gene transcription. We evaluated the intracellular localization and expression of TEAD1-4, hypothesized to regulate the activity of YAP and, consequently, liver regeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intracellular localization of TEAD1-4 was characterized in tumor-free liver (TFL) tissue samples from 44 ALPPS patients obtained during the two stages of ALPPS surgery. Expression levels were correlated with clinical and pathological data as well as liver regeneration metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TEAD family members are simultaneously expressed in individual hepatocytes and show relations with liver regeneration, clinical outcome and outcome parameters when comparing TFL tissue obtained at different stages of ALPPS surgery. Furthermore, differences in TEAD expression and localization within hepatocytes appeared to be independent of global factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TEAD1-4 expression correlates with liver regeneration outcomes. Specifically, cytoplasmic and nuclear expression scores of TEAD1 serve as predictive markers for clinical outcomes following ALPPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143052370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-21DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.016
Niki Rashidian, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Isabella Frigerio, Martina Guerra, Sigrid Sterckx, Francesca Tozzi, Giulia Capelli, Daunia Verdi, Gaya Spolverato, Aiste Gulla, Francesca Ratti, Andrew J Healey, Alessandro Esposito, Matteo De Pastena, Andrea Belli, Stefan A Bouwense, Angelakoudis Apostolos, Sven A Lang, Victor López-López, Gregor S Alexander, Luca Aldrighetti, Oliver Strobel, Roland Croner, Andrew A Gumbs
Background: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery is a complex specialty and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications have the potential to improve pre- intra- and postoperative outcomes of HPB surgery. While ethics guidelines have been developed for the use of AI in clinical surgery, the ethical implications and reliability of AI in HPB surgery remain specifically unexplored.
Methods: An online survey was developed by the Innovation Committee of the E-AHPBA to investigate the current perspectives on the ethical principles and trustworthiness of AI in HPB Surgery among E-AHPBA membership. The survey consisted of 22 questions, based on guidelines outlined by the Artificial Intelligence Surgery Journal Task Force on AI Ethics in clinical surgery and was disseminated via email to all E-AHPBA members.
Results: A total of 84 members of the E-AHPBA participated in the survey. Seventeen out of 22 questions achieved more than 80 % agreement, with nine of those exceeding 90 %. Five questions had agreement levels between 70 % and 80 %.
Conclusion: While HPB surgeons are aware of the need to regulate the use of AI devices, robots, and to protect patient data, consensus appears to be heterogeneous regarding AI's role in mitigating gender-related and minority biases, as well as ensuring fairness and equity.
{"title":"Ethics and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary surgery: a snapshot of insights from the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) survey.","authors":"Niki Rashidian, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Isabella Frigerio, Martina Guerra, Sigrid Sterckx, Francesca Tozzi, Giulia Capelli, Daunia Verdi, Gaya Spolverato, Aiste Gulla, Francesca Ratti, Andrew J Healey, Alessandro Esposito, Matteo De Pastena, Andrea Belli, Stefan A Bouwense, Angelakoudis Apostolos, Sven A Lang, Victor López-López, Gregor S Alexander, Luca Aldrighetti, Oliver Strobel, Roland Croner, Andrew A Gumbs","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery is a complex specialty and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications have the potential to improve pre- intra- and postoperative outcomes of HPB surgery. While ethics guidelines have been developed for the use of AI in clinical surgery, the ethical implications and reliability of AI in HPB surgery remain specifically unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was developed by the Innovation Committee of the E-AHPBA to investigate the current perspectives on the ethical principles and trustworthiness of AI in HPB Surgery among E-AHPBA membership. The survey consisted of 22 questions, based on guidelines outlined by the Artificial Intelligence Surgery Journal Task Force on AI Ethics in clinical surgery and was disseminated via email to all E-AHPBA members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 84 members of the E-AHPBA participated in the survey. Seventeen out of 22 questions achieved more than 80 % agreement, with nine of those exceeding 90 %. Five questions had agreement levels between 70 % and 80 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HPB surgeons are aware of the need to regulate the use of AI devices, robots, and to protect patient data, consensus appears to be heterogeneous regarding AI's role in mitigating gender-related and minority biases, as well as ensuring fairness and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.015
Abdullah Altaf, Muhammad M Munir, Muhammad Muntazir M Khan, Zayed Rashid, Mujtaba Khalil, Alfredo Guglielmi, Francesca Ratti, Luca Aldrighetti, Todd W Bauer, Hugo P Marques, Guillaume Martel, Sorin Alexandrescu, Matthew J Weiss, Minoru Kitago, George Poultsides, Shishir K Maithel, Carlo Pulitano, Vincent Lam, Irinel Popescu, Ana Gleisner, Tom Hugh, Feng Shen, François Cauchy, Bas G Koerkamp, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik
Objective: We sought to develop a machine learning (ML) preoperative model to predict bile leak following hepatectomy for primary and secondary liver cancer.
Methods: An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to predict post-hepatectomy bile leak using data from the ACS-NSQIP database. The model was externally validated using data from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) multi-institutional databases.
Results: Overall, 20,570 and 2253 patients were identified from the ACS-NSQIP and multi-institutional databases, respectively. The incidence rates of bile leak were 7.0 %, 6.3 % and 10.2 % in the ACS-NSQIP, HCC and ICC databases, respectively. The XGBoost model achieved areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of 0.748, 0.719 and 0.711 in the training, testing and external validation cohorts, respectively. The SHAP algorithm demonstrated that the factors most strongly predictive of postoperative bile leak were serum alkaline phosphatase, surgical approach and cancer diagnosis. An online tool was developed for ease-of-use and clinical applicability (https://altaf-pawlik-bileleak-calculator.streamlit.app/).
Conclusion: A novel ML model demonstrated strong discrimination power to preoperatively identify patients at high risk of developing bile leak post-hepatectomy. The online calculator may be used as a clinical tool to inform preoperative surgical planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative recovery protocols for patients undergoing hepatectomy.
{"title":"Machine learning based prediction model for bile leak following hepatectomy for liver cancer.","authors":"Abdullah Altaf, Muhammad M Munir, Muhammad Muntazir M Khan, Zayed Rashid, Mujtaba Khalil, Alfredo Guglielmi, Francesca Ratti, Luca Aldrighetti, Todd W Bauer, Hugo P Marques, Guillaume Martel, Sorin Alexandrescu, Matthew J Weiss, Minoru Kitago, George Poultsides, Shishir K Maithel, Carlo Pulitano, Vincent Lam, Irinel Popescu, Ana Gleisner, Tom Hugh, Feng Shen, François Cauchy, Bas G Koerkamp, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to develop a machine learning (ML) preoperative model to predict bile leak following hepatectomy for primary and secondary liver cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to predict post-hepatectomy bile leak using data from the ACS-NSQIP database. The model was externally validated using data from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) multi-institutional databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 20,570 and 2253 patients were identified from the ACS-NSQIP and multi-institutional databases, respectively. The incidence rates of bile leak were 7.0 %, 6.3 % and 10.2 % in the ACS-NSQIP, HCC and ICC databases, respectively. The XGBoost model achieved areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of 0.748, 0.719 and 0.711 in the training, testing and external validation cohorts, respectively. The SHAP algorithm demonstrated that the factors most strongly predictive of postoperative bile leak were serum alkaline phosphatase, surgical approach and cancer diagnosis. An online tool was developed for ease-of-use and clinical applicability (https://altaf-pawlik-bileleak-calculator.streamlit.app/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A novel ML model demonstrated strong discrimination power to preoperatively identify patients at high risk of developing bile leak post-hepatectomy. The online calculator may be used as a clinical tool to inform preoperative surgical planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative recovery protocols for patients undergoing hepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a significant public health issue, primarily affecting the liver. While several management strategies exist, there is a lack of predictive tools to guide surgical decisions for hepatic CE. This study aimed to develop predictive models to support surgical decision-making in hepatic CE, enhancing the precision of patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical management pathways.
Methods: This retrospective analysis included 406 hepatic CE patients treated at our center (2009-2021). Clinical, imaging, and treatment data were used to develop a Cox regression and a decision tree model to identify factors influencing surgical intervention, with model performance validated using K-fold cross-validation, train/test split, bootstrapping.
Results: Imaging findings and symptomatology emerged as the most significant predictors. The Cox model demonstrated a concordance index of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.96, while the decision tree model identified imaging, cyst stage, and symptoms as critical factors, achieving strong performance across validation techniques (mean AUC 0.950; 95% CI: [0.889, 0.978]).
Conclusion: This study presents validated predictive models for assessing surgical risk in hepatic CE. Integrating these models into clinical practice offers a dynamic tool that surpasses static guidelines, optimizing patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical pathways and potentially improving outcomes.
{"title":"Machine learning to predict the decision to perform surgery in hepatic echinococcosis.","authors":"Raffaella Lissandrin, Ottavia Cicerone, Ambra Vola, Gianluca D'Alessandro, Simone Frassini, Tommaso Manciulli, Simone Famularo, Annalisa De Silvestri, Jacopo Viganò, Pietro Quaretti, Luca Ansaloni, Enrico Brunetti, Marcello Maestri","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a significant public health issue, primarily affecting the liver. While several management strategies exist, there is a lack of predictive tools to guide surgical decisions for hepatic CE. This study aimed to develop predictive models to support surgical decision-making in hepatic CE, enhancing the precision of patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical management pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 406 hepatic CE patients treated at our center (2009-2021). Clinical, imaging, and treatment data were used to develop a Cox regression and a decision tree model to identify factors influencing surgical intervention, with model performance validated using K-fold cross-validation, train/test split, bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Imaging findings and symptomatology emerged as the most significant predictors. The Cox model demonstrated a concordance index of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.96, while the decision tree model identified imaging, cyst stage, and symptoms as critical factors, achieving strong performance across validation techniques (mean AUC 0.950; 95% CI: [0.889, 0.978]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents validated predictive models for assessing surgical risk in hepatic CE. Integrating these models into clinical practice offers a dynamic tool that surpasses static guidelines, optimizing patient allocation to surgical or non-surgical pathways and potentially improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.015
Peter L Z Labib, Thomas B Russell, Jemimah L Denson, Mark A Puckett, Fabio Ausania, Elizabeth Pando, Keith J Roberts, Ambareen Kausar, Vasileios K Mavroeidis, Ricky H Bhogal, Gabriele Marangoni, Sarah C Thomasset, Adam E Frampton, Duncan R Spalding, Pavlos Lykoudis, Manuel Maglione, Nassir Alhaboob, Parthi Srinivasan, Hassaan Bari, Andrew Smith, Ismael Dominguez-Rosado, Daniel Croagh, Rohan G Thakkar, Dhanny Gomez, Michael A Silva, Pierfrancesco Lapolla, Andrea Mingoli, Brian R Davidson, Alberto Porcu, Nehal S Shah, Zaed Z Hamady, Bilal A Al-Sarireh, Alejandro Serrablo, Somaiah Aroori
Background: Most patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) develop recurrence. No previous studies have investigated predictors of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC. Our study aimed to determine timing, pattern and predictors of any-site and local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.
Methods: Patients who underwent PD for PDAC between June 2012 and May 2015 (29 centres, eight countries) were included. The primary outcome was recurrence pattern (none, local-only, distant-only or mixed local/distant). Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, investigations, operation details, complications, histology, adjuvant therapies, recurrence and survival. Univariable tests and regression analysis investigated factors associated with any-site and local-only recurrence.
Results: Of 866 patients, 573 (66 %) developed recurrence: 170 (20 %) developed local-only recurrence, 164 (19 %) developed mixed local/distant recurrence, and 239 (28 %) developed distant-only recurrence. Local-only or lung-only recurrence had a more favourable prognosis than other recurrence patterns. Predictors of any-site recurrence were preoperative biliary stenting, venous resection and poorly-differentiated, node-positive tumours. Predictors of local-only recurrence were preoperative radiological lymphadenopathy, well-differentiated tumours, fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes and intraoperative blood transfusion.
Discussion: Ensuring radical resection and avoiding intraoperative blood transfusion may reduce the risk of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.
{"title":"Patterns, timing and predictors of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicentre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Peter L Z Labib, Thomas B Russell, Jemimah L Denson, Mark A Puckett, Fabio Ausania, Elizabeth Pando, Keith J Roberts, Ambareen Kausar, Vasileios K Mavroeidis, Ricky H Bhogal, Gabriele Marangoni, Sarah C Thomasset, Adam E Frampton, Duncan R Spalding, Pavlos Lykoudis, Manuel Maglione, Nassir Alhaboob, Parthi Srinivasan, Hassaan Bari, Andrew Smith, Ismael Dominguez-Rosado, Daniel Croagh, Rohan G Thakkar, Dhanny Gomez, Michael A Silva, Pierfrancesco Lapolla, Andrea Mingoli, Brian R Davidson, Alberto Porcu, Nehal S Shah, Zaed Z Hamady, Bilal A Al-Sarireh, Alejandro Serrablo, Somaiah Aroori","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) develop recurrence. No previous studies have investigated predictors of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC. Our study aimed to determine timing, pattern and predictors of any-site and local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent PD for PDAC between June 2012 and May 2015 (29 centres, eight countries) were included. The primary outcome was recurrence pattern (none, local-only, distant-only or mixed local/distant). Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, investigations, operation details, complications, histology, adjuvant therapies, recurrence and survival. Univariable tests and regression analysis investigated factors associated with any-site and local-only recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 866 patients, 573 (66 %) developed recurrence: 170 (20 %) developed local-only recurrence, 164 (19 %) developed mixed local/distant recurrence, and 239 (28 %) developed distant-only recurrence. Local-only or lung-only recurrence had a more favourable prognosis than other recurrence patterns. Predictors of any-site recurrence were preoperative biliary stenting, venous resection and poorly-differentiated, node-positive tumours. Predictors of local-only recurrence were preoperative radiological lymphadenopathy, well-differentiated tumours, fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes and intraoperative blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ensuring radical resection and avoiding intraoperative blood transfusion may reduce the risk of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143052369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.009
Nitzan Zohar, Eliyahu Gorgov, Theresa P. Yeo, Harish Lavu, Wilbur Bowne, Charles J. Yeo, Avinoam Nevler
Background
Post-operative incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication following abdominal surgery. Data regarding IH after major pancreatic surgery are limited. We aim to evaluate the long-term risk of IH following major pancreatic resection.
Methods
A dual-approach study: a large multi-institutional research network (RN) was investigated for IH incidence and risk factors in propensity-score matched survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), was complemented by a patient-reported questionnaire.
Results
RN analysis identified 22,113 patients that underwent pancreatic surgery. 11.0% of PD patients and 8.6% of DP patients developed IH (P < 0.0001). IH rates were higher with open surgery compared with minimally invasive approaches in PD (OR = 1.56, P = 0.03) and DP (OR = 1.94, P = 0.003). BMI>35 was found to correlate with increased IH rates for PD and DP (OR = 1.87, and OR = 1.86, respectively, P < 0.0001 each), as did postoperative intraabdominal infections (P < 0.0001). Patient-based survey of 104 patients, revealed that 16 patients (15%) reported post-operative IH during the follow-up period. BMI≥30, SSI and intra-abdominal abscesses were associated with increased IH risk (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Improved survival after pancreatic resection has led to an increased prevalence of long-term surgical sequela. In this study, we demonstrate significant rates of IH among long-term survivors and assess potential risk factors.
术后切口疝(IH)是腹部手术后常见的并发症。有关胰腺大手术后切口疝的数据非常有限。我们旨在评估大胰腺切除术后 IH 的长期风险。我们开展了一项双途径研究:在一个大型多机构研究网络(RN)中调查了胰十二指肠切除术(PD)和远端胰切除术(DP)后倾向分数匹配的幸存者的 IH 发生率和风险因素,并对胰腺手术幸存者群组进行了患者报告问卷调查,以评估 IH 发生率。RN分析确定了22113名接受过胰腺手术的患者,并创建了7092对匹配的胰腺切除术和胰腺切除术患者(随访时间大于1年)。11.0%的胰腺癌患者和8.6%的直肠癌患者发生了IH(P 35与胰腺癌和直肠癌的IH发生率增加相关(OR=1.87和OR=1.86,P均<0.0001)),术后腹腔内感染和吻合口漏也与IH发生率增加相关(OR=1.53和OR=1.59,P均<0.0001)。对 104 名患者进行的患者调查显示,16 名患者(15%)在随访期间报告了术后 IH。BMI≥30、SSI和腹腔内脓肿与IH风险增加有关(P<0.05)。胰腺切除术后生存率的提高导致长期手术后遗症的发生率增加。在这项研究中,我们证明了长期幸存者中 IH 的显著发生率,并评估了潜在的风险因素。
{"title":"Incisional hernia after major pancreatic resection: long term risk assessment from two distinct sources – A large multi-institutional network and a single high-volume center","authors":"Nitzan Zohar, Eliyahu Gorgov, Theresa P. Yeo, Harish Lavu, Wilbur Bowne, Charles J. Yeo, Avinoam Nevler","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-operative incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication following abdominal surgery. Data regarding IH after major pancreatic surgery are limited. We aim to evaluate the long-term risk of IH following major pancreatic resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A dual-approach study: a large multi-institutional research network (RN) was investigated for IH incidence and risk factors in propensity-score matched survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), was complemented by a patient-reported questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>RN analysis identified 22,113 patients that underwent pancreatic surgery. 11.0% of PD patients and 8.6% of DP patients developed IH (P < 0.0001). IH rates were higher with open surgery compared with minimally invasive approaches in PD (OR = 1.56, P = 0.03) and DP (OR = 1.94, P = 0.003). BMI>35 was found to correlate with increased IH rates for PD and DP (OR = 1.87, and OR = 1.86, respectively, P < 0.0001 each), as did postoperative intraabdominal infections (P < 0.0001). Patient-based survey of 104 patients, revealed that 16 patients (15%) reported post-operative IH during the follow-up period. BMI≥30, SSI and intra-abdominal abscesses were associated with increased IH risk (P < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Improved survival after pancreatic resection has led to an increased prevalence of long-term surgical sequela. In this study, we demonstrate significant rates of IH among long-term survivors and assess potential risk factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"26 12","pages":"Pages 1487-1494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142180083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}