Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000544
K. Zuckerman, Olivia J. Lindly, Brianna K Sinche, C. Bethell, Roula Choueiri, V. Chris
s of Plenary Sessions and Posters Accepted for Presentation at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics PLATFORM SESSION ABSTRACTS PRESENTATIONS
发展与行为儿科学会2015年年会平台会议接受全体会议和海报的报告摘要
{"title":"Abstracts of Plenary Sessions and Posters Accepted for Presentation at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","authors":"K. Zuckerman, Olivia J. Lindly, Brianna K Sinche, C. Bethell, Roula Choueiri, V. Chris","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000544","url":null,"abstract":"s of Plenary Sessions and Posters Accepted for Presentation at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics PLATFORM SESSION ABSTRACTS PRESENTATIONS","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"56 1","pages":"S1–S21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82274844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-12-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000526
S. Schlegel
31. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Finkelhor D, et al. Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactics scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of american parents. Child Abuse Negl. 1998;22:249–270. 32. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, et al. The world health organization composite international diagnostic interview shortform (CIDI-SF). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1998;7:171–185. 33. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Version 7 User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2006. 34. Deater-Deckard K, Dodge KA, Sorbring E. Cultural differences in the effects of physical punishment. In: Rutter M, ed. Ethnicity and Causal Mechanisms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2005:204–226. 35. Dodge KA, McLoyd VC, Lansford JE. The Cultural Context of Physically Disciplining Children. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005. 36. Berlin LJ, Ispa JM, Fine MA, et al. Correlates and consequences of spanking and verbal punishment for low income white, african american, and mexican american toddlers. Child Dev. 2009;80: 1403–1420. 37. Thackeray JD, Hibbard R, Dowd MD. Committee on child abuse and neglect, committee on injury, violence, and poison prevention. Intimate partner violence: the role of the pediatrician. Pediatrics. 2010;125:1094–1100. 38. Sanders MR. Triple P-positive parenting program: towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1999;2: 71–90.
{"title":"My Heart Canʼt Even Believe It: A Story of Science, Love, and Down Syndrome","authors":"S. Schlegel","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000526","url":null,"abstract":"31. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Finkelhor D, et al. Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactics scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of american parents. Child Abuse Negl. 1998;22:249–270. 32. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, et al. The world health organization composite international diagnostic interview shortform (CIDI-SF). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1998;7:171–185. 33. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Version 7 User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2006. 34. Deater-Deckard K, Dodge KA, Sorbring E. Cultural differences in the effects of physical punishment. In: Rutter M, ed. Ethnicity and Causal Mechanisms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2005:204–226. 35. Dodge KA, McLoyd VC, Lansford JE. The Cultural Context of Physically Disciplining Children. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005. 36. Berlin LJ, Ispa JM, Fine MA, et al. Correlates and consequences of spanking and verbal punishment for low income white, african american, and mexican american toddlers. Child Dev. 2009;80: 1403–1420. 37. Thackeray JD, Hibbard R, Dowd MD. Committee on child abuse and neglect, committee on injury, violence, and poison prevention. Intimate partner violence: the role of the pediatrician. Pediatrics. 2010;125:1094–1100. 38. Sanders MR. Triple P-positive parenting program: towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1999;2: 71–90.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76418170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-11-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000532
Emily E. Whitgob
interventions that target children’s screen time for reduction. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e193–e210. 21. Forehand R, Jones DJ, Parent J. Behavioral parenting interventions for child disruptive behaviors and anxiety: what’s different and what’s the same? Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:133–145. 22. Schmidt ME, Haines J, O’Brien A, et al. Systematic review of effective strategies for reducing screen time among young children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:1338–1354. 23. Iida M, Shrout P, Laurenceau J, et al. Using diary methods in psychological research. In: Cooper H, Camic P, Long D, et al, ed. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 1. Foundations, Planning, Measures, and Psychometrics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books; 2012: 277–305. 24. Jones DJ, Forehand R, Cuellar J, et al. Technology-enhanced program for child disruptive behavior disorders: development and pilot randomized control trial. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43:88–101. 25. Morris SD. Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods. 2008;11:364–386. 26. Brown A, Shifrin DL, Hill DL. Beyond “turn it off”: how to advise families on media use. AAP News. 2015;36:54. 27. Radesky JS, Christakis DA. Increased screen time. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63:827–839. 28. Buchanan L, Rooks-Peck CR, Finnie RKC, et al. Reducing recreational sedentary screen time: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50:402–415. 29. Wu YP, Steele RG, Connelly MA, et al. Commentary: pediatric eHealth interventions: common challenges during development, implementation, and dissemination. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;39: 612–623. 30. Lauricella AR, Wartella E, Rideout VJ. Young children’s screen time: the complex role of parent and child factors. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2015;36:11–17. 31. Dubois L, Farmer A, Girard M, et al. Social factors and television use during meals and snacks is associated with higher BMI among preschool children. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:1267–1279. 32. Ollendick TH, Davis TE. One-session treatment for specific phobias: a review of Öst’s single-session exposure with children and adolescents. Cogn Behav Ther. 2013;42:275–283.
针对减少儿童屏幕时间的干预措施。儿科。2011;128:e193-e210。21. J.行为父母干预对儿童破坏性行为和焦虑的影响:有何不同?临床心理杂志,2013;33:133-145。22. 李建军,李建军,李建军,等。对减少幼儿屏幕时间的有效策略进行系统审查。肥胖(银泉)。2012; 20:1338 - 1354。23. 刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,等。在心理学研究中运用日记法。见:Cooper H, Camic P, Long D等编。APA心理学研究方法手册:第1卷。基础、计划、措施和心理测量学。华盛顿:美国心理学会图书;2012: 277 - 305。24. 张建军,张建军,张建军,等。儿童破坏性行为障碍的技术增强方案:发展和试点随机对照试验。临床青少年心理杂志,2014;43(3):88 - 101。25. 莫里斯SD。估计前测后测控制组设计的效应量。器官研究。2008;11:364-386。26. Brown A, Shifrin DL, Hill DL。除了“关掉它”:如何建议家庭使用媒体。美联社新闻。2015;36:54。27. Radesky JS, Christakis DA。屏幕时间增加。中华儿科杂志,2016;63:827-839。28. 李建军,李建军,李建军,等。减少娱乐久坐屏幕时间:一项社区指南系统综述。[J]中华预防医学杂志,2016;22(5):591 - 591。29. 吴彦平,Steele RG, Connelly MA,等。评论:儿科电子卫生干预:发展、实施和传播过程中的共同挑战。中华儿科杂志,2014;39:612-623。30.Lauricella AR, Wartella E, Rideout VJ。幼儿的屏幕时间:亲子因素的复杂作用。[J] .应用开发学报。2015;36:11-17。31. 杜波依斯L, Farmer A, Girard M,等。社会因素和在吃饭和吃零食时看电视与学龄前儿童较高的身体质量指数有关。中华卫生杂志,2008;11:1267-1279。32. 奥伦迪克TH,戴维斯TE。特定恐惧症的单次治疗:Öst儿童和青少年单次暴露的回顾。中国生物医学工程学报,2013;42(2):775 - 783。
{"title":"Behind from the Start","authors":"Emily E. Whitgob","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000532","url":null,"abstract":"interventions that target children’s screen time for reduction. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e193–e210. 21. Forehand R, Jones DJ, Parent J. Behavioral parenting interventions for child disruptive behaviors and anxiety: what’s different and what’s the same? Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:133–145. 22. Schmidt ME, Haines J, O’Brien A, et al. Systematic review of effective strategies for reducing screen time among young children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:1338–1354. 23. Iida M, Shrout P, Laurenceau J, et al. Using diary methods in psychological research. In: Cooper H, Camic P, Long D, et al, ed. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 1. Foundations, Planning, Measures, and Psychometrics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books; 2012: 277–305. 24. Jones DJ, Forehand R, Cuellar J, et al. Technology-enhanced program for child disruptive behavior disorders: development and pilot randomized control trial. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43:88–101. 25. Morris SD. Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods. 2008;11:364–386. 26. Brown A, Shifrin DL, Hill DL. Beyond “turn it off”: how to advise families on media use. AAP News. 2015;36:54. 27. Radesky JS, Christakis DA. Increased screen time. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63:827–839. 28. Buchanan L, Rooks-Peck CR, Finnie RKC, et al. Reducing recreational sedentary screen time: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50:402–415. 29. Wu YP, Steele RG, Connelly MA, et al. Commentary: pediatric eHealth interventions: common challenges during development, implementation, and dissemination. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;39: 612–623. 30. Lauricella AR, Wartella E, Rideout VJ. Young children’s screen time: the complex role of parent and child factors. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2015;36:11–17. 31. Dubois L, Farmer A, Girard M, et al. Social factors and television use during meals and snacks is associated with higher BMI among preschool children. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:1267–1279. 32. Ollendick TH, Davis TE. One-session treatment for specific phobias: a review of Öst’s single-session exposure with children and adolescents. Cogn Behav Ther. 2013;42:275–283.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79245294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-11-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000531
T. Chorbadjian, D. Vanderbilt
juvenile justice. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2008;39:396–404. 18. Briggs R, German M, Schrag-Hershberg R, et al. Integrated pediatric behavioral health: implications for training and intervention. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2016;47:312–319. 19. Brown JD, King MA, Wissow LS. The central role of relationships to trauma-informed integrated care for children and youth. Acad Pediatr. 2017;17:S94–S101. 20. Olsson MB, Hwang CP. Depression in mothers and fathers of children with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001;45:535–543. 21. Hinojosa MS, Hinojosa R, Fernandez-Baca D, et al. Parental strain, parental health, and community characteristics among children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Acad Pediatr. 2012; 12:502–508.
少年司法。心理学教授与实践。2008;39:396-404。18. Briggs R, German M, Schrag-Hershberg R,等。综合儿科行为健康:培训和干预的意义。心理学教授与实践。2016;47:312-319。19. Brown JD, King MA, Wissow LS。关系对儿童和青少年创伤知情综合护理的核心作用。中华儿科杂志,2017;17:S94-S101。20.黄cp。智力障碍儿童父母抑郁的研究。[J]智障杂志,2001;45(5):535 - 543。21. Hinojosa MS, Hinojosa R, Fernandez-Baca D,等。注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的父母压力、父母健康和社区特征儿科院士,2012;12:502 - 508。
{"title":"Child Temperament: New Thinking About the Boundary Between Traits and Illness","authors":"T. Chorbadjian, D. Vanderbilt","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000531","url":null,"abstract":"juvenile justice. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2008;39:396–404. 18. Briggs R, German M, Schrag-Hershberg R, et al. Integrated pediatric behavioral health: implications for training and intervention. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2016;47:312–319. 19. Brown JD, King MA, Wissow LS. The central role of relationships to trauma-informed integrated care for children and youth. Acad Pediatr. 2017;17:S94–S101. 20. Olsson MB, Hwang CP. Depression in mothers and fathers of children with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001;45:535–543. 21. Hinojosa MS, Hinojosa R, Fernandez-Baca D, et al. Parental strain, parental health, and community characteristics among children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Acad Pediatr. 2012; 12:502–508.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85878512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-09-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000472
L. Copeland
This book by national experts lives up to its title. It is practical, well organized, and well referenced. Primary care is emphasized in pediatric prevention, detection, and intervention for developmental–behavioral problems in private and public health settings. Care coordination and evidence-based methods for early detection and screening are reviewed. Useful appendices cover topics ranging from preventive health visit forms to judging training effectiveness to teaching developmental milestones. Particularly useful is the initial navigation guide locating specific topics in the book. Web pages for chapter subjects and links to professional and parenting websites abound, with helpful downloadable materials. Chapters open with a list of highlights and a relevant glossary. “Red flag” tables are succinct and instructive. Background is given showing cost savings from quality early intervention versus the huge cost of underdetection of developmental problems. Evidence is presented on the ineffectiveness of informal approaches for developmental screening, setting the foundation for scientific yet practical measurement approaches. Several quick broad-band screening tools (e.g., Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3, the PEDS: Developmental Milestones), autism-specific screeners such as the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (MCHAT), and other accepted tools are reviewed. Interpreting results, making needed referrals and follow-up plans are well explained. Federal and state laws including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Testing (EPSDT) are related to local impact. Key subtitles such as “Here’s what providers need to know and do” document practical steps. How Part C eligibility for early intervention varies across states is discussed, with needed referral steps and agency contact websites for programs such as Birth to Three. Although acknowledging the reality of 15minute well visits, there is a resounding shout-out for how much can be done in just 3 of those minutes to address developmental issues. Family focus is embedded throughout the book, but family needs are particularly explored in midchapters. How to prepare parents for the early detection process is discussed, including how to clarify billing and any denied claims. Sample cover letters model optimal parent literacy level. Collaboration between stakeholders is emphasized for best child outcomes. Developmental promotion pearls are offered. Thought-provoking case presentations bring the material to life. Models are given for clear, supportive statements to give difficult news while encouraging parental follow-through. Issues of unique populations such as older children are not forgotten. Screening tools discussed for older children include mental health screening, use of diagnostic attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder scales, academic measures such as the Safety Word Inventory and Literacy Screener (SWILS), and academic te
{"title":"Identifying and Addressing Developmental–Behavioral Problems: A Practical Guide for Medical and Nonmedical Professionals, Trainees, Researchers, and Advocates","authors":"L. Copeland","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000472","url":null,"abstract":"This book by national experts lives up to its title. It is practical, well organized, and well referenced. Primary care is emphasized in pediatric prevention, detection, and intervention for developmental–behavioral problems in private and public health settings. Care coordination and evidence-based methods for early detection and screening are reviewed. Useful appendices cover topics ranging from preventive health visit forms to judging training effectiveness to teaching developmental milestones. Particularly useful is the initial navigation guide locating specific topics in the book. Web pages for chapter subjects and links to professional and parenting websites abound, with helpful downloadable materials. Chapters open with a list of highlights and a relevant glossary. “Red flag” tables are succinct and instructive. Background is given showing cost savings from quality early intervention versus the huge cost of underdetection of developmental problems. Evidence is presented on the ineffectiveness of informal approaches for developmental screening, setting the foundation for scientific yet practical measurement approaches. Several quick broad-band screening tools (e.g., Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3, the PEDS: Developmental Milestones), autism-specific screeners such as the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (MCHAT), and other accepted tools are reviewed. Interpreting results, making needed referrals and follow-up plans are well explained. Federal and state laws including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Testing (EPSDT) are related to local impact. Key subtitles such as “Here’s what providers need to know and do” document practical steps. How Part C eligibility for early intervention varies across states is discussed, with needed referral steps and agency contact websites for programs such as Birth to Three. Although acknowledging the reality of 15minute well visits, there is a resounding shout-out for how much can be done in just 3 of those minutes to address developmental issues. Family focus is embedded throughout the book, but family needs are particularly explored in midchapters. How to prepare parents for the early detection process is discussed, including how to clarify billing and any denied claims. Sample cover letters model optimal parent literacy level. Collaboration between stakeholders is emphasized for best child outcomes. Developmental promotion pearls are offered. Thought-provoking case presentations bring the material to life. Models are given for clear, supportive statements to give difficult news while encouraging parental follow-through. Issues of unique populations such as older children are not forgotten. Screening tools discussed for older children include mental health screening, use of diagnostic attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder scales, academic measures such as the Safety Word Inventory and Literacy Screener (SWILS), and academic te","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86732066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-04-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000389
Jennifer Lucarelli, E. Davidson
{"title":"Fine Motor Skills for Children with Down Syndrome: A Guide for Parents and Professionals","authors":"Jennifer Lucarelli, E. Davidson","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000389","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89781690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-04-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000442
Cate Sinclair, P. Meredith, J. Strong
center: family perspectives on decision making and ADHD and implications for ADHD care. J Atten Disord. 2012;16:675–684. 9. Taylor M, Donoghue T, Houghton S. To medicate or not to medicate? The decision-making process of western Australian parents following their child’s diagnosis with an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2006;53:111–128. 10. Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication—Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49:980–989. 11. James AC, James G, Cowdrey FA, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD004690. 12. Strawn JR, Welge JA, Wehry AM, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants in pediatric anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32:149–157. 13. Pyke-Grimm KA, Degner L, Small A, et al. Preferences for participation in treatment decision making and information needs of parents of children with cancer: a pilot study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1999;16:13–24. 14. Mak L, Hiebert-Murphy D, Walker JR, et al. Parents’ decision making and their information needs concerning treatments for child anxiety: implications for family-centered practice. J Fam Soc Work. 2014;17:51–67. 15. Bernstein KI, Promislow S, Carr R, et al. The information needs and preferences of recently diagnosed patients with IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:590–598. 16. Stewart DW, Walker JR, Beatie B, et al. Postsecondary students’ information needs and pathways for help with stress, anxiety, and depression. Can J Couns Psychother. 2014;48:356–374. 17. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:746–750. 18. Cummings P, Koepsell TD. P values vs estimates of association with confidence intervals. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164: 193–196. 19. Hummelinck A, Pollock K. Parents’ information needs about the treatment of their chronically ill child: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62:228–234. 20. Gregory AM, Eley TC. The genetic basis of child and adolescent anxiety disorders. In: Silverman WK, Field AP, eds. Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2011:161–178. ch 8. 21. Murray L, Creswell C, Cooper PJ. The development of anxiety disorders in childhood: an integrative review. Psychol Med. 2009; 39:1413–1423. 22. Thon A, Ullrich G. Information needs in parents of children with a rheumatic disease. Child Care Health Dev. 2009;35:41–49. 23. Jackson R, Baird W, Davis-Reynolds L, et al. Qualitative analysis of parents’ information needs and psychosocial experiences when supporting children with health care needs. Health Info Libr J. 2008;25:31–37. 24. Watson PW, McKinstry B. A systematic review of i
中心:家庭观点对决策和ADHD的影响及其对ADHD护理的影响。[J] .音像学杂志,2012;16(6):675 - 684。9. Taylor M, Donoghue T, Houghton s。用药还是不用药?西澳大利亚父母在孩子被诊断患有注意力缺陷多动障碍后的决策过程。中华伤残教育杂志,2006;5(3):111 - 128。10. Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M,等。美国青少年精神障碍的终生患病率:来自国家共病调查复制-青少年补充(NCS-A)的结果[J] .中华精神病学杂志,2010;49(9):980 - 989。11. James AC, James G, Cowdrey FA,等。儿童和青少年焦虑症的认知行为疗法。Cochrane Database system Rev. 2015;CD004690。12. Strawn JR, Welge JA, Wehry AM,等。抗抑郁药在儿童焦虑症中的疗效和耐受性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。抑郁焦虑。2015;32:49 - 157。13. 王晓明,王晓明,王晓明,等。癌症儿童父母参与治疗决策的偏好和信息需求:一项试点研究。[J]中华儿科护理杂志。1999;16:13-24。14. Mak L, Hiebert-Murphy D, Walker JR,等。关于儿童焦虑治疗的父母决策及其信息需求:对以家庭为中心的实践的启示。[J] .社会科学学报,2014;17(5):551 - 567。15. Bernstein KI, Promislow S, Carr R,等。新近诊断的IBD患者的信息需求和偏好。炎症肠病,2011;17:59 - 598。16. Stewart DW, Walker JR, Beatie B等。高等教育学生的信息需求和途径,以帮助压力,焦虑和抑郁。[J]中国心理医学杂志,2014;48(8):356 - 374。17. Gardner MJ, Altman DG。置信区间而不是P值:估计而不是假设检验。Br Med J(临床医学)。1986; 292:746 - 750。18. 卡明斯P,科普塞尔TD。P值与置信区间关联的估计值。中华儿科与青少年医学杂志。2010;32(4):393 - 396。19. 父母对慢性病儿童治疗的信息需求:一项定性研究。病人教育管理。2006;62:228-234。20.Gregory AM, Eley TC。儿童和青少年焦虑症的遗传基础。见:Silverman WK, Field AP,编辑。儿童和青少年焦虑症。第二版。剑桥,英国:剑桥大学出版社;2011:161 - 178。ch 8。21. 穆雷L,克雷斯韦尔C,库珀PJ。儿童焦虑症的发展:一项综合综述。精神医学2009;39:1413 - 1423。22. Thon A, Ullrich G.风湿病患儿家长的信息需求。儿童保健发展。2009;35:41-49。23. 刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,等。父母在支持有卫生保健需求的儿童时的信息需求和心理社会经验的定性分析。中华卫生杂志,2008;25(1):31 - 37。24. 在医疗保健咨询中提高医疗建议回忆的干预措施的系统评价。中华临床医学杂志,2009;32(2):391 - 391。25. Cunningham CE, Walker JR, Eastwood JD等。成年早期心理健康信息偏好建模:一个离散选择联合实验。卫生通讯J . 2014;19:413 - 440。26. 张建军,张建军,张建军,等。关于儿童焦虑的网站如何很好地回答了家长关于治疗选择的问题?临床儿童心理与精神病学。2015;20:555-569。27. 李建军,李建军,李建军,等。国际患者辅助决策标准合作的十年:评估患者辅助决策质量的核心维度的演变。BMC医学通报2013;13(增刊2):s1。28. Stacey D, lsamgarise F, Col NF,等。为面临健康治疗或筛查决定的人提供决策辅助。Cochrane Database system Rev. 2014;CD001431。29. Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Hamby DW。以家庭为中心的帮扶实践研究的元分析。智力迟钝、发展和残疾,2007;13:370-378。
{"title":"The Personal and Contextual Factors Affecting the Functional Ability of Children and Adolescents With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review (vol 37, pg 327, 2016)","authors":"Cate Sinclair, P. Meredith, J. Strong","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000442","url":null,"abstract":"center: family perspectives on decision making and ADHD and implications for ADHD care. J Atten Disord. 2012;16:675–684. 9. Taylor M, Donoghue T, Houghton S. To medicate or not to medicate? The decision-making process of western Australian parents following their child’s diagnosis with an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2006;53:111–128. 10. Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication—Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49:980–989. 11. James AC, James G, Cowdrey FA, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD004690. 12. Strawn JR, Welge JA, Wehry AM, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants in pediatric anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32:149–157. 13. Pyke-Grimm KA, Degner L, Small A, et al. Preferences for participation in treatment decision making and information needs of parents of children with cancer: a pilot study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1999;16:13–24. 14. Mak L, Hiebert-Murphy D, Walker JR, et al. Parents’ decision making and their information needs concerning treatments for child anxiety: implications for family-centered practice. J Fam Soc Work. 2014;17:51–67. 15. Bernstein KI, Promislow S, Carr R, et al. The information needs and preferences of recently diagnosed patients with IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:590–598. 16. Stewart DW, Walker JR, Beatie B, et al. Postsecondary students’ information needs and pathways for help with stress, anxiety, and depression. Can J Couns Psychother. 2014;48:356–374. 17. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:746–750. 18. Cummings P, Koepsell TD. P values vs estimates of association with confidence intervals. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164: 193–196. 19. Hummelinck A, Pollock K. Parents’ information needs about the treatment of their chronically ill child: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62:228–234. 20. Gregory AM, Eley TC. The genetic basis of child and adolescent anxiety disorders. In: Silverman WK, Field AP, eds. Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2011:161–178. ch 8. 21. Murray L, Creswell C, Cooper PJ. The development of anxiety disorders in childhood: an integrative review. Psychol Med. 2009; 39:1413–1423. 22. Thon A, Ullrich G. Information needs in parents of children with a rheumatic disease. Child Care Health Dev. 2009;35:41–49. 23. Jackson R, Baird W, Davis-Reynolds L, et al. Qualitative analysis of parents’ information needs and psychosocial experiences when supporting children with health care needs. Health Info Libr J. 2008;25:31–37. 24. Watson PW, McKinstry B. A systematic review of i","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83793111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-04-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000388
L. Mak, J. Walker, D. Hiebert-murphy, Gary Altman
Objective: To assess the information needs and preferences of parents who were making decisions concerning treatment for their child's anxiety. Methods: Ninety-three parents were recruited from hospital-based clinics, a parent group, and a public information meeting. They completed a survey about preference for decision-making involvement, information needs, and preferences concerning source and amount of information. Results: Most (69%) parents indicated that they prefer a collaborative decision-making role. They rated very highly the need for general information related to treatment and information related to psychosocial interventions and medication treatment. Fewer parents rated information about logistics of treatment (e.g., scheduling, cost) as highly important although this information was considered important by many parents. Direct discussions with a provider, written information, and information accessed through the internet were the most preferred sources of information. Many parents indicated a preference for substantial amounts of information about psychosocial and medication treatments. Conclusion: Much of the information that parents want concerning treatment is not widely available. It would be helpful to develop evidence-based brochures and web information resources that focus on answering parents' questions concerning treatment of children's anxiety.
{"title":"Information Needs and Preferences of Parents Considering Treatment of Child Anxiety","authors":"L. Mak, J. Walker, D. Hiebert-murphy, Gary Altman","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000388","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the information needs and preferences of parents who were making decisions concerning treatment for their child's anxiety. Methods: Ninety-three parents were recruited from hospital-based clinics, a parent group, and a public information meeting. They completed a survey about preference for decision-making involvement, information needs, and preferences concerning source and amount of information. Results: Most (69%) parents indicated that they prefer a collaborative decision-making role. They rated very highly the need for general information related to treatment and information related to psychosocial interventions and medication treatment. Fewer parents rated information about logistics of treatment (e.g., scheduling, cost) as highly important although this information was considered important by many parents. Direct discussions with a provider, written information, and information accessed through the internet were the most preferred sources of information. Many parents indicated a preference for substantial amounts of information about psychosocial and medication treatments. Conclusion: Much of the information that parents want concerning treatment is not widely available. It would be helpful to develop evidence-based brochures and web information resources that focus on answering parents' questions concerning treatment of children's anxiety.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"60 1","pages":"173–180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88480873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-02-01DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000383
P. Shankar, Rainjade Chung, D. Frank
Objective: Food Insecurity (FI) occurs in 21% of families with children and adolescents in the United States, but the potential developmental and behavioral implications of this prevalent social determinant of health have not been comprehensively elucidated. This systematic review aims to examine the association between FI and childhood developmental and behavioral outcomes in western industrialized countries. Method: This review provides a critical summary of 23 peer reviewed articles from developed countries on the associations between FI and adverse childhood developmental behavioral outcomes including early cognitive development, academic performance, inattention, externalizing behaviors, and depression in 4 groups–infants and toddlers, preschoolers, school age, and adolescents. Various approaches to measuring food insecurity are delineated. Potential confounding and mediating variables of this association are compared across studies. Alternate explanatory mechanisms of observed effects and need for further research are discussed. Results: This review demonstrates that household FI, even at marginal levels, is associated with children's behavioral, academic, and emotional problems from infancy to adolescence across western industrialized countries - even after controlling for confounders. Conclusions: While the American Academy of Pediatrics already recommends routine screening for food insecurity during health maintenance visits, the evidence summarized here should encourage developmental behavioral health providers to screen for food insecurity in their practices and intervene when possible. Conversely, children whose families are identified as food insecure in primary care settings warrant enhanced developmental behavioral assessment and possible intervention.
{"title":"Association of Food Insecurity with Children's Behavioral, Emotional, and Academic Outcomes: A Systematic Review","authors":"P. Shankar, Rainjade Chung, D. Frank","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000383","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Food Insecurity (FI) occurs in 21% of families with children and adolescents in the United States, but the potential developmental and behavioral implications of this prevalent social determinant of health have not been comprehensively elucidated. This systematic review aims to examine the association between FI and childhood developmental and behavioral outcomes in western industrialized countries. Method: This review provides a critical summary of 23 peer reviewed articles from developed countries on the associations between FI and adverse childhood developmental behavioral outcomes including early cognitive development, academic performance, inattention, externalizing behaviors, and depression in 4 groups–infants and toddlers, preschoolers, school age, and adolescents. Various approaches to measuring food insecurity are delineated. Potential confounding and mediating variables of this association are compared across studies. Alternate explanatory mechanisms of observed effects and need for further research are discussed. Results: This review demonstrates that household FI, even at marginal levels, is associated with children's behavioral, academic, and emotional problems from infancy to adolescence across western industrialized countries - even after controlling for confounders. Conclusions: While the American Academy of Pediatrics already recommends routine screening for food insecurity during health maintenance visits, the evidence summarized here should encourage developmental behavioral health providers to screen for food insecurity in their practices and intervene when possible. Conversely, children whose families are identified as food insecure in primary care settings warrant enhanced developmental behavioral assessment and possible intervention.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"7 1","pages":"135–150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84054413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}