首页 > 最新文献

Journal of memory and language最新文献

英文 中文
Cues to lexical stress assignment in reading Italian: A megastudy with polysyllabic nonwords 意大利语阅读中的词汇重音分配线索:多音节非词的大型研究
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104517
Giacomo Spinelli , Sonia Trettenero , Stephen J. Lupker , Lucia Colombo

When reading polysyllabic words, assignment of lexical stress is a challenge for readers, especially in languages, such as English or Italian, in which stress position is not strictly determined even though words as well as nonwords typically contain several sublexical cues to stress that readers might use. Here, we attempted to identify such cues using a corpus analysis and to examine their impact on human performance in a megastudy in which participants (N = 45) assigned stress to nonwords (N = 800), stimuli particularly revealing of stress cue use because they have no predefined stress pattern. Hierarchical regression results confirmed an impact of sublexical cues examined in former studies and revealed a role for cues not previously examined, including similarity to real words. These results are informative for computational models of reading as they indicate that readers assign stress to nonwords based on not only sublexical but also lexical information.

在阅读多音节词时,词性重音的分配对读者来说是一个挑战,尤其是在英语或意大利语等语言中,重音位置并不是严格确定的,即使单词和非单词通常包含读者可能使用的若干重音次词汇线索。在这里,我们尝试使用语料库分析来识别这些线索,并在一项大型研究中检验它们对人类表现的影响。在这项研究中,参与者(N = 45)为非词(N = 800)分配重音,由于非词没有预先确定的重音模式,因此特别能揭示重音线索的使用。层次回归结果证实了以前研究中考察过的次词汇线索的影响,并揭示了以前未考察过的线索的作用,包括与实词的相似性。这些结果对阅读的计算模型很有参考价值,因为它们表明读者不仅会根据词法信息,还会根据词法信息来给非词分配重音。
{"title":"Cues to lexical stress assignment in reading Italian: A megastudy with polysyllabic nonwords","authors":"Giacomo Spinelli ,&nbsp;Sonia Trettenero ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Lupker ,&nbsp;Lucia Colombo","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104517","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When reading polysyllabic words, assignment of lexical stress is a challenge for readers, especially in languages, such as English or Italian, in which stress position is not strictly determined even though words as well as nonwords typically contain several sublexical cues to stress that readers might use. Here, we attempted to identify such cues using a corpus analysis and to examine their impact on human performance in a megastudy in which participants (<em>N</em> = 45) assigned stress to nonwords (<em>N</em> = 800), stimuli particularly revealing of stress cue use because they have no predefined stress pattern. Hierarchical regression results confirmed an impact of sublexical cues examined in former studies and revealed a role for cues not previously examined, including similarity to real words. These results are informative for computational models of reading as they indicate that readers assign stress to nonwords based on not only sublexical but also lexical information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140551415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Graded phonological neighborhood effects on lexical retrieval: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese 分级语音邻域对词汇检索的影响:普通话的证据
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104526
Luan Li , Tingting Hu , Shuting Liu

How phonological neighborhood affects lexical retrieval can shed important light on lexical organization and processing. Yet these effects are unclear, particularly in Mandarin Chinese. This is likely because the working definition of phonological neighbors (i.e., the one-phoneme edit rule) used in Indo-European languages inadequately characterizes the phonological similarity among Mandarin words, which have simpler syllable structures and lexical tones. The current study proposes a graded Mandarin phonological neighborhood and investigates the impacts of near-to-distant Mandarin phonological neighbors on lexical retrieval. In Study 1, we investigated how Mandarin phonological similarity is influenced by the editing of lexical tone, constituent (onset/rime, initial/final) and phoneme. Native Mandarin speakers rated the similarity between the edited monosyllabic words. We found that constituent-edit neighbors were rated as the most dissimilar, followed by phoneme-edit neighbors, while tone-edit neighbors were the most similar. In Study 2, we calculated the constituent-, phoneme- and tone-edit phonological neighborhood densities and frequencies for 4,706 monosyllabic Mandarin words. We then utilized extant datasets to examine how the density and frequency of neighbors at varied distances, as well as of homophonic neighbors, impact response latencies in word naming, visual lexical decision, and picture naming tasks. The results showed that graded phonological neighbors had differential impacts on lexical retrieval efficiency: distant (constituent-edit) neighbors facilitated word retrieval, while near (phoneme-, tone-edit and homophonic) neighbors had inhibitory effects. We discuss these findings within an interactive activation and competition framework and suggest future directions to study the representation and processing of the Mandarin phonological lexicon.

语音邻域如何影响词汇检索可以为词汇组织和加工提供重要启示。然而,这些影响尚不明确,尤其是在汉语普通话中。这可能是因为印欧语言中使用的音素邻域的工作定义(即单音素编辑规则)不能充分表征普通话词之间的音素相似性,而普通话的音节结构和词调都比较简单。目前的研究提出了一个分级的普通话语音邻域,并调查了近距离普通话语音邻域对词汇检索的影响。在研究 1 中,我们调查了普通话语音相似性如何受到词汇声调、成分(起始音/韵母、首音/尾音)和音素编辑的影响。以普通话为母语的人对经过编辑的单音节词之间的相似性进行评分。我们发现,成分编辑相邻词的相似度最高,其次是音素编辑相邻词,而声调编辑相邻词的相似度最高。在研究 2 中,我们计算了 4706 个单音节普通话词语的成分编辑、音素编辑和声调编辑语音邻域密度和频率。然后,我们利用现有的数据集来研究不同距离的邻近词密度和频率以及同音邻近词密度和频率如何影响单词命名、视觉词性判断和图片命名任务中的反应潜伏期。结果表明,分级语音邻接对词汇检索效率有不同的影响:远邻(成分编辑)有利于词汇检索,而近邻(音素、音调编辑和同音)则有抑制作用。我们在互动激活和竞争框架内讨论了这些发现,并提出了研究普通话语音词典表征和处理的未来方向。
{"title":"Graded phonological neighborhood effects on lexical retrieval: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese","authors":"Luan Li ,&nbsp;Tingting Hu ,&nbsp;Shuting Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104526","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How phonological neighborhood affects lexical retrieval can shed important light on lexical organization and processing. Yet these effects are unclear, particularly in Mandarin Chinese. This is likely because the working definition of phonological neighbors (i.e., the one-phoneme edit rule) used in Indo-European languages inadequately characterizes the phonological similarity among Mandarin words, which have simpler syllable structures and lexical tones. The current study proposes a graded Mandarin phonological neighborhood and investigates the impacts of near-to-distant Mandarin phonological neighbors on lexical retrieval. In Study 1, we investigated how Mandarin phonological similarity is influenced by the editing of lexical tone, constituent (onset/rime, initial/final) and phoneme. Native Mandarin speakers rated the similarity between the edited monosyllabic words. We found that constituent-edit neighbors were rated as the most dissimilar, followed by phoneme-edit neighbors, while tone-edit neighbors were the most similar. In Study 2, we calculated the constituent-, phoneme- and tone-edit phonological neighborhood densities and frequencies for 4,706 monosyllabic Mandarin words. We then utilized extant datasets to examine how the density and frequency of neighbors at varied distances, as well as of homophonic neighbors, impact response latencies in word naming, visual lexical decision, and picture naming tasks. The results showed that graded phonological neighbors had differential impacts on lexical retrieval efficiency: distant (constituent-edit) neighbors facilitated word retrieval, while near (phoneme-, tone-edit and homophonic) neighbors had inhibitory effects. We discuss these findings within an interactive activation and competition framework and suggest future directions to study the representation and processing of the Mandarin phonological lexicon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24000299/pdfft?md5=3b508ad7687f67de29a3fc280ac9edf0&pid=1-s2.0-S0749596X24000299-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences and the role of the task 语法句子中的一致吸引和任务的作用
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104525
Anna Laurinavichyute , Titus von der Malsburg

This study evaluates two broad classes of language processing accounts that make predictions for sentences like “The admirer of the singer(s) apparently thinks...”. Feature distortion accounts predict increased processing difficulty at the verb in sentences with a plural distractor noun (singers) while similarity-based interference accounts predict the opposite: increased difficulty in sentences with a singular distractor noun (singer). Neither of these effects was reliably observed in earlier research, and the Bayesian meta-analysis of 31 published studies reported here is almost perfectly inconclusive. An explanation may be that both effects occur simultaneously and therefore mask each other. To test this idea, we conducted three single-trial self-paced reading experiments (N1=4,296, N2=3,920, N3=3,559) which orthogonally manipulated agreement attraction and inhibitory interference. Surprisingly, all three experiments produced evidence for agreement attraction but none for inhibitory interference, which supports feature distortion but not similarity-based interference accounts. Experiment 4 (N4=3,535) tested the role of the expected task by preparing participants for a comprehension question (vs. acceptability judgment in Experiments 1–3). It showed neither agreement attraction nor inhibitory interference effects. Our findings demonstrate that agreement attraction effects can arise in grammatical sentences – contra earlier research – but also that these effects crucially depend on the task. This explains inconsistent results in prior research and supports feature distortion as the driving force behind attraction effects in grammatical sentences.

本研究评估了对 "歌手的崇拜者显然认为...... "这样的句子进行预测的两大类语言处理账户。特征失真账户预测,在有复数分心名词(歌手)的句子中,动词的处理难度会增加;而基于相似性的干扰账户则预测相反的情况:在有单数分心名词(歌手)的句子中,处理难度会增加。这两种效应在早期的研究中都没有被可靠地观察到,本文报告的对 31 项已发表研究的贝叶斯元分析几乎完全没有结论。一种解释可能是这两种效应同时出现,因此相互掩盖。为了验证这一观点,我们进行了三个单次自我步调阅读实验(N1=4,296,N2=3,920,N3=3,559),正交操纵了一致吸引和抑制干扰。令人惊讶的是,所有这三个实验都产生了协议吸引的证据,但没有抑制干扰的证据,这支持了特征扭曲的说法,但不支持基于相似性的干扰说法。实验 4(N4=3,535)通过让参与者准备一个理解问题(相对于实验 1-3 中的可接受性判断)来测试预期任务的作用。该实验既没有显示出一致吸引效应,也没有显示出抑制干扰效应。我们的研究结果表明,语法句子中可能会出现一致吸引效应--这与之前的研究相反--但这些效应关键取决于任务。这就解释了之前研究中不一致的结果,并支持了语法句中吸引效应背后的驱动力--特征扭曲。
{"title":"Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences and the role of the task","authors":"Anna Laurinavichyute ,&nbsp;Titus von der Malsburg","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104525","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates two broad classes of language processing accounts that make predictions for sentences like “The admirer of the singer(s) apparently thinks...”. Feature distortion accounts predict increased processing difficulty at the verb in sentences with a plural distractor noun (<em>singers</em>) while similarity-based interference accounts predict the opposite: increased difficulty in sentences with a singular distractor noun (<em>singer</em>). Neither of these effects was reliably observed in earlier research, and the Bayesian meta-analysis of 31 published studies reported here is almost perfectly inconclusive. An explanation may be that both effects occur simultaneously and therefore mask each other. To test this idea, we conducted three single-trial self-paced reading experiments (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>296</mn></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>920</mn></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>559</mn></mrow></math></span>) which orthogonally manipulated agreement attraction and inhibitory interference. Surprisingly, all three experiments produced evidence for agreement attraction but none for inhibitory interference, which supports feature distortion but not similarity-based interference accounts. Experiment 4 (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>535</mn></mrow></math></span>) tested the role of the expected task by preparing participants for a comprehension question (vs. acceptability judgment in Experiments 1–3). It showed neither agreement attraction nor inhibitory interference effects. Our findings demonstrate that agreement attraction effects can arise in grammatical sentences – contra earlier research – but also that these effects crucially depend on the task. This explains inconsistent results in prior research and supports feature distortion as the driving force behind attraction effects in grammatical sentences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24000287/pdfft?md5=835ee4a4baae65f1e4eaffdad26e96b7&pid=1-s2.0-S0749596X24000287-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140190768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retracing the garden-path: Nonselective rereading and no reanalysis 重走花园小径非选择性重读和无重新分析
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104515
Kiel Christianson , Jack Dempsey , Anna Tsiola , Sarah-Elizabeth M. Deshaies , Nayoung Kim

When people read temporarily ambiguous (“garden-path”) sentences, the forward movement of their eyes is often interrupted by regressions. These regressions are usually followed by rereading some portion of the previously read text. Frazier and Rayner (1982) proposed the Selective Reanalysis Hypothesis (SRH), which proposed that readers regress to critical choice points in the syntactic phrase marker of garden-paths where misparses had occurred, and furthermore, then reanalyzed the syntactic structure to arrive at a correct parse in most cases. A considerable amount of more recent work, however, suggests that readers often do not derive a correct parse or interpretation from such sentences. If these more recent observations are accurate, perhaps rereading is not necessarily strategic, controlled, or predictable. The current study consists of two large-scale eye-tracking experiments designed specifically to examine where and how much people reread garden-path sentences, and whether rereading influences comprehension accuracy. A variable text-masking paradigm was employed to restrict access to portions of garden-paths and non-garden-paths during rereading. Scanpath analyses were used to determine whether some or all participants targeted syntactically critical parts of previously read text. Comprehension questions probed final interpretations. In short, readers often misinterpreted the garden-paths, and no rereading measures predicted better comprehension. Furthermore, scanpath analyses revealed considerable variation across and within readers; only small percentages of trials conformed to structurally-based predictions. Taken together, we fail to find support for structurally strategic rereading. We therefore propose that rereading of these sentences is more often “confirmatory” than “revisionary” in nature.

当人们阅读暂时模棱两可("花园路径")的句子时,视线的前移往往会被倒退打断。在这些回退之后,人们通常会重读之前所读文章的某些部分。Frazier 和 Rayner(1982 年)提出了 "选择性再分析假说"(Selective Reanalysis Hypothesis,SRH),认为读者会倒退到园路句法短语标记中出现误读的关键选择点,然后重新分析句法结构,在大多数情况下得出正确的解析。然而,大量最新研究表明,读者往往无法从这类句子中得出正确的解析或解释。如果这些最新观察结果是准确的,那么重读就不一定是策略性的、可控的或可预测的。目前的研究包括两个大规模的眼动跟踪实验,目的是专门研究人们重读花园路径句子的位置和程度,以及重读是否会影响理解的准确性。实验采用了一种可变的文本屏蔽范式,在重读过程中限制人们接触花园路径和非花园路径的部分内容。扫描路径分析用于确定部分或全部参与者是否针对以前阅读过的文本的句法关键部分。理解问题则是对最终解释的探究。简而言之,读者经常误解花园路径,而且没有任何重读措施能预测更好的理解。此外,对扫描路径的分析表明,不同读者之间以及读者内部都存在很大差异;只有很小比例的试验符合基于结构的预测。综上所述,我们未能发现结构策略性重读的支持。因此,我们认为对这些句子的重读更多的是 "确认性 "而非 "修正性 "的。
{"title":"Retracing the garden-path: Nonselective rereading and no reanalysis","authors":"Kiel Christianson ,&nbsp;Jack Dempsey ,&nbsp;Anna Tsiola ,&nbsp;Sarah-Elizabeth M. Deshaies ,&nbsp;Nayoung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104515","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When people read temporarily ambiguous (“garden-path”) sentences, the forward movement of their eyes is often interrupted by regressions. These regressions are usually followed by rereading some portion of the previously read text. <span>Frazier and Rayner (1982)</span> proposed the Selective Reanalysis Hypothesis (SRH), which proposed that readers regress to critical choice points in the syntactic phrase marker of garden-paths where misparses had occurred, and furthermore, then reanalyzed the syntactic structure to arrive at a correct parse in most cases. A considerable amount of more recent work, however, suggests that readers often do not derive a correct parse or interpretation from such sentences. If these more recent observations are accurate, perhaps rereading is not necessarily strategic, controlled, or predictable. The current study consists of two large-scale eye-tracking experiments designed specifically to examine where and how much people reread garden-path sentences, and whether rereading influences comprehension accuracy. A variable text-masking paradigm was employed to restrict access to portions of garden-paths and non-garden-paths during rereading. Scanpath analyses were used to determine whether some or all participants targeted syntactically critical parts of previously read text. Comprehension questions probed final interpretations. In short, readers often misinterpreted the garden-paths, and no rereading measures predicted better comprehension. Furthermore, scanpath analyses revealed considerable variation across and within readers; only small percentages of trials conformed to structurally-based predictions. Taken together, we fail to find support for structurally strategic rereading. We therefore propose that rereading of these sentences is more often “confirmatory” than “revisionary” in nature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24000184/pdfft?md5=aaf2815367084a115f22b40d37e6f424&pid=1-s2.0-S0749596X24000184-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140135142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relating foveal and parafoveal processing efficiency with word-level parameters in text reading 文本阅读中眼窝和眼底处理效率与词级参数的关系
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104516
Timo T. Heikkilä, Nea Soralinna, Jukka Hyönä

The study examined whether word-level eye-movement patterns in text reading can be predicted by individual differences in foveal and parafoveal word processing efficiency. Individual differences in lexical skills were gauged by presenting words and pseudowords with short exposure times in the fovea (30–60 ms) and at varying eccentricities in the parafovea. Lexical decision was used to index orthographic processing, word naming to index phonological processing and pseudoword naming to index grapheme-phoneme decoding. The Random Forests statistical technique was used to assess the relative importance of individual difference measures in predicting readers’ eye-movement patterns. The results show that individual differences in foveal word processing efficiency are better predictors of both foveal and parafoveal word processing during reading than differences in parafoveal processing efficiency. Results indicate that individual variability in foveal word recognition skills are better determinants of reading fluency among adult readers than variability in parafoveal word recognition skills.

该研究探讨了文字阅读中的单词级眼动模式是否可以通过眼窝和眼底的文字处理效率的个体差异来预测。通过在眼窝(30-60 毫秒)和视网膜旁不同偏心率处以较短曝光时间呈现单词和伪单词来衡量个体在词汇技能方面的差异。词性决定用来表示正字法处理,单词命名用来表示语音处理,假词命名用来表示词素-词素解码。随机森林统计技术用于评估个体差异测量在预测读者眼动模式方面的相对重要性。结果表明,与视网膜旁处理效率的差异相比,视网膜文字处理效率的个体差异能更好地预测阅读过程中视网膜和视网膜旁的文字处理。结果表明,与视网膜旁单词识别能力的差异相比,视网膜单词识别能力的个体差异更能决定成年读者的阅读流畅性。
{"title":"Relating foveal and parafoveal processing efficiency with word-level parameters in text reading","authors":"Timo T. Heikkilä,&nbsp;Nea Soralinna,&nbsp;Jukka Hyönä","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104516","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study examined whether word-level eye-movement patterns in text reading can be predicted by individual differences in foveal and parafoveal word processing efficiency. Individual differences in lexical skills were gauged by presenting words and pseudowords with short exposure times in the fovea (30–60 ms) and at varying eccentricities in the parafovea. Lexical decision was used to index orthographic processing, word naming to index phonological processing and pseudoword naming to index grapheme-phoneme decoding. The Random Forests statistical technique was used to assess the relative importance of individual difference measures in predicting readers’ eye-movement patterns. The results show that individual differences in foveal word processing efficiency are better predictors of both foveal and parafoveal word processing during reading than differences in parafoveal processing efficiency. Results indicate that individual variability in foveal word recognition skills are better determinants of reading fluency among adult readers than variability in parafoveal word recognition skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24000196/pdfft?md5=de1a2e64cc51ed86519c117f0bf9d9e5&pid=1-s2.0-S0749596X24000196-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140066962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding words in context: A naturalistic EEG study of children’s lexical processing 在语境中理解词语:儿童词汇加工的自然脑电图研究
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104512
Tatyana Levari, Jesse Snedeker

When listening to speech, adults rely on context to anticipate upcoming words. Evidence for this comes from studies demonstrating that the N400, an event-related potential (ERP) that indexes ease of lexical-semantic processing, is influenced by the predictability of a word in context. We know far less about the role of context in children’s speech comprehension. The present study explored lexical processing in adults and 5–10-year-old children as they listened to a story. ERPs time-locked to the onset of every word were recorded. Each content word was coded for frequency, semantic association, and predictability. In both children and adults, N400s reflect word predictability, even when controlling for frequency and semantic association. These findings suggest that both adults and children use top-down constraints from context to anticipate upcoming words when listening to stories.

成年人在听语音时,会根据上下文来预测即将出现的单词。有研究表明,N400(一种事件相关电位(ERP),可反映词汇-语义处理的难易程度)会受到上下文中单词可预测性的影响,这就是证据。我们对语境在儿童言语理解中的作用所知甚少。本研究探讨了成人和 5-10 岁儿童在听故事时的词汇处理过程。研究人员记录了与每个单词开始时时间锁定的 ERPs。每个内容词都根据频率、语义关联和可预测性进行了编码。在儿童和成人中,即使控制了词频和语义关联,N400s 也能反映出单词的可预测性。这些研究结果表明,成人和儿童在听故事时都会利用上下文的自上而下的限制来预测即将出现的单词。
{"title":"Understanding words in context: A naturalistic EEG study of children’s lexical processing","authors":"Tatyana Levari,&nbsp;Jesse Snedeker","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104512","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When listening to speech, adults rely on context to anticipate upcoming words. Evidence for this comes from studies demonstrating that the N400, an event-related potential (ERP) that indexes ease of lexical-semantic processing, is influenced by the predictability of a word in context. We know far less about the role of context in children’s speech comprehension. The present study explored lexical processing in adults and 5–10-year-old children as they listened to a story. ERPs time-locked to the onset of every word were recorded. Each content word was coded for frequency, semantic association, and predictability. In both children and adults, N400s reflect word predictability, even when controlling for frequency and semantic association. These findings suggest that both adults and children use top-down constraints from context to anticipate upcoming words when listening to stories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140063253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Executive functioning predicts development of reading skill and perceptual span seven years later 执行功能可预测七年后阅读技能和知觉跨度的发展
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104511
Johannes M. Meixner , Jochen Laubrock

What is the role of executive functions in longitudinally predicting reading success in general and perceptual-span size in particular? We present two new waves of our sequential-cohort longitudinal study of perceptual-span development, including five waves totally spanning grades 1 to 10. Using nonlinear mixed effects growth-curve modeling we here show that executive functioning measured in the early primary-school years predicts reading performance seven years later, even if controlled for initial reading performance. Moreover, the two variables exerted an interactive influence, suggesting mutual benefit. Effects of initial executive functioning on the final perceptual span were even more pronounced than on reading rate, suggesting a substantial contribution of executive processes to perceptual-span development. Perceptual-span development is critical for successful reading: The initial reading-rate difference between slower and faster readers diverged at the point when perceptual-span development was fastest, and stabilized at inflated differences thereafter. In an educational setting, early tests of executive functioning may be useful for identifying children who are likely to need intervention to become proficient readers.

执行功能在纵向预测阅读成功,特别是感知跨度大小方面的作用是什么?我们对感知跨度的发展进行了连续队列纵向研究,包括从一年级到十年级的五个阶段。利用非线性混合效应成长曲线模型,我们在此表明,即使控制了最初的阅读成绩,在小学低年级测量的执行功能也能预测七年后的阅读成绩。此外,这两个变量还产生了交互影响,表明两者互惠互利。最初的执行功能对最终知觉跨度的影响甚至比对阅读率的影响更明显,这表明执行过程对知觉跨度的发展有很大的贡献。知觉跨度的发展对成功阅读至关重要:在知觉跨度发展最快的时候,阅读速度较慢和阅读速度较快的人之间的初始阅读速度差异就会出现分化,之后就会稳定在夸大的差异上。在教育环境中,执行功能的早期测试可能有助于识别那些可能需要干预才能成为熟练读者的儿童。
{"title":"Executive functioning predicts development of reading skill and perceptual span seven years later","authors":"Johannes M. Meixner ,&nbsp;Jochen Laubrock","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104511","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What is the role of executive functions in longitudinally predicting reading success in general and perceptual-span size in particular? We present two new waves of our sequential-cohort longitudinal study of perceptual-span development, including five waves totally spanning grades 1 to 10. Using nonlinear mixed effects growth-curve modeling we here show that executive functioning measured in the early primary-school years predicts reading performance seven years later, even if controlled for initial reading performance. Moreover, the two variables exerted an interactive influence, suggesting mutual benefit. Effects of initial executive functioning on the final perceptual span were even more pronounced than on reading rate, suggesting a substantial contribution of executive processes to perceptual-span development. Perceptual-span development is critical for successful reading: The initial reading-rate difference between slower and faster readers diverged at the point when perceptual-span development was fastest, and stabilized at inflated differences thereafter. In an educational setting, early tests of executive functioning may be useful for identifying children who are likely to need intervention to become proficient readers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140015343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crosslinguistic evidence against interference from extra-sentential distractors 跨语言学证据表明,句外分心词不会造成干扰
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104514
Daniela Mertzen , Anna Laurinavichyute , Brian W. Dillon , Ralf Engbert , Shravan Vasishth

Cue-based retrieval theories of sentence processing posit that long-distance dependency formation is guided by a cue-based retrieval mechanism: dependents are retrieved via retrieval cues associated with a verb. When retrieval cues match multiple similar items in memory, this leads to cue-based retrieval interference. A landmark study by Van Dyke and McElree tested interference from sentence-external items: retrieval cues were manipulated to (mis-)match semantically similar items presented prior to a target dependency. The support for interference of this type is weak, and only comes from English object cleft constructions. Our study provides a cross-linguistic investigation of interference from sentence-external items: Three eyetracking studies in English, German and Russian tested interference in the online processing of filler-gap dependencies under varying task demands. A fourth study attempted to replicate the Van Dyke and McElree study using self-paced reading. Bayes factors analyses show cross-linguistic evidence against interference from sentence-external items. A broader implication from these data is that cue-based retrieval interference is driven by sentence-internal distracting items, suggesting that a cue-based search is restricted to the current linguistic context.

基于检索线索的句子加工理论认为,长距离依存关系的形成是由基于检索线索的机制引导的:依存关系是通过与动词相关的检索线索检索出来的。当检索线索与记忆中的多个相似项目相匹配时,就会产生基于线索的检索干扰。Van Dyke 和 McElree 所做的一项具有里程碑意义的研究测试了来自句子外部项目的干扰:通过操纵检索线索来(错误地)匹配在目标依存词之前出现的语义相似的项目。对这种干扰的支持很弱,而且只来自英语的宾语裂隙结构。我们的研究对来自句子外部项目的干扰进行了跨语言调查:我们用英语、德语和俄语进行了三项眼动跟踪研究,测试了在不同任务要求下在线处理填空依存关系时产生的干扰。第四项研究试图利用自定进度阅读复制 Van Dyke 和 McElree 的研究。贝叶斯因子分析显示,跨语言证据表明句子外部项目不会产生干扰。这些数据的一个更广泛的含义是,基于线索的检索干扰是由句子内部的干扰项驱动的,这表明基于线索的检索仅限于当前的语言环境。
{"title":"Crosslinguistic evidence against interference from extra-sentential distractors","authors":"Daniela Mertzen ,&nbsp;Anna Laurinavichyute ,&nbsp;Brian W. Dillon ,&nbsp;Ralf Engbert ,&nbsp;Shravan Vasishth","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104514","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cue-based retrieval theories of sentence processing posit that long-distance dependency formation is guided by a cue-based retrieval mechanism: dependents are retrieved via retrieval cues associated with a verb. When retrieval cues match multiple similar items in memory, this leads to cue-based retrieval interference. A landmark study by Van Dyke and McElree tested interference from sentence-external items: retrieval cues were manipulated to (mis-)match semantically similar items presented prior to a target dependency. The support for interference of this type is weak, and only comes from English object cleft constructions. Our study provides a cross-linguistic investigation of interference from sentence-external items: Three eyetracking studies in English, German and Russian tested interference in the online processing of filler-gap dependencies under varying task demands. A fourth study attempted to replicate the Van Dyke and McElree study using self-paced reading. Bayes factors analyses show cross-linguistic evidence against interference from sentence-external items. A broader implication from these data is that cue-based retrieval interference is driven by sentence-internal distracting items, suggesting that a cue-based search is restricted to the current linguistic context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24000172/pdfft?md5=2d5bd19be51e756a7c6ec5785c27b7bc&pid=1-s2.0-S0749596X24000172-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140013982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Large-scale benchmark yields no evidence that language model surprisal explains syntactic disambiguation difficulty 大规模基准测试结果显示,没有证据表明语言模型的意外性可以解释句法消歧的难度
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104510
Kuan-Jung Huang , Suhas Arehalli , Mari Kugemoto , Christian Muxica , Grusha Prasad , Brian Dillon , Tal Linzen

Prediction has been proposed as an overarching principle that explains human information processing in language and beyond. To what degree can processing difficulty in syntactically complex sentences – one of the major concerns of psycholinguistics – be explained by predictability, as estimated using computational language models, and operationalized as surprisal (negative log probability)? A precise, quantitative test of this question requires a much larger scale data collection effort than has been done in the past. We present the Syntactic Ambiguity Processing Benchmark, a dataset of self-paced reading times from 2000 participants, who read a diverse set of complex English sentences. This dataset makes it possible to measure processing difficulty associated with individual syntactic constructions, and even individual sentences, precisely enough to rigorously test the predictions of computational models of language comprehension. By estimating the function that relates surprisal to reading times from filler items included in the experiment, we find that the predictions of language models with two different architectures sharply diverge from the empirical reading time data, dramatically underpredicting processing difficulty, failing to predict relative difficulty among different syntactic ambiguous constructions, and only partially explaining item-wise variability. These findings suggest that next-word prediction is most likely insufficient on its own to explain human syntactic processing.

预测被认为是解释人类语言及其他方面信息处理的首要原则。句法复杂句子的处理难度--心理语言学的主要关注点之一--在多大程度上可以用可预测性来解释,可预测性是用计算语言模型估算的,并可操作为惊奇(负对数概率)?要对这一问题进行精确的定量测试,需要比以往更大规模的数据收集工作。我们提出了句法歧义处理基准(Syntactic Ambiguity Processing Benchmark),这是一个由 2000 名参与者组成的自定进度阅读时间数据集,他们阅读了一系列复杂的英语句子。通过该数据集,我们可以精确测量与单个句法结构甚至单个句子相关的处理难度,从而严格检验语言理解计算模型的预测结果。通过从实验中的填充项目中估算意外与阅读时间之间的函数,我们发现两种不同架构的语言模型的预测结果与实证阅读时间数据大相径庭,它们大大低估了处理难度,无法预测不同句法模糊结构之间的相对难度,而且只能部分解释项目的变化。这些发现表明,下一单词预测本身很可能不足以解释人类的句法处理过程。
{"title":"Large-scale benchmark yields no evidence that language model surprisal explains syntactic disambiguation difficulty","authors":"Kuan-Jung Huang ,&nbsp;Suhas Arehalli ,&nbsp;Mari Kugemoto ,&nbsp;Christian Muxica ,&nbsp;Grusha Prasad ,&nbsp;Brian Dillon ,&nbsp;Tal Linzen","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104510","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prediction has been proposed as an overarching principle that explains human information processing in language and beyond. To what degree can processing difficulty in syntactically complex sentences – one of the major concerns of psycholinguistics – be explained by predictability, as estimated using computational language models, and operationalized as surprisal (negative log probability)? A precise, quantitative test of this question requires a much larger scale data collection effort than has been done in the past. We present the Syntactic Ambiguity Processing Benchmark, a dataset of self-paced reading times from 2000 participants, who read a diverse set of complex English sentences. This dataset makes it possible to measure processing difficulty associated with individual syntactic constructions, and even individual sentences, precisely enough to rigorously test the predictions of computational models of language comprehension. By estimating the function that relates surprisal to reading times from filler items included in the experiment, we find that the predictions of language models with two different architectures sharply diverge from the empirical reading time data, dramatically underpredicting processing difficulty, failing to predict relative difficulty among different syntactic ambiguous constructions, and only partially explaining item-wise variability. These findings suggest that next-word prediction is most likely insufficient on its own to explain human syntactic processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139992406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Eye-movements during reading and noisy-channel inference making 阅读时的眼球运动和噪声通道推理
IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104513
Michael G. Cutter , Kevin B. Paterson , Ruth Filik

This novel experiment investigates the relationship between readers’ eye movements and their use of “noisy channel” inferences when reading implausible sentences, and how this might be affected by cognitive aging. Young (18–26 years) and older (65–87 years) adult participants read sentences which were either plausible or implausible. Crucially, readers could assign a plausible interpretation to the implausible sentences by inferring that a preposition (i.e., to) had been unintentionally omitted or included. Our results reveal that readers’ fixation locations within such sentences are associated with the likelihood of them inferring the presence or absence of this critical preposition to reach a plausible interpretation. Moreover, our older adults were more likely to make these noisy-channel inferences than the younger adults, potentially because their poorer visual processing and greater linguistic experience promote such inference-making. We propose that the present findings provide novel experimental evidence for a perceptual contribution to noisy-channel inference-making during reading.

这项新颖的实验研究了读者在阅读似是而非的句子时眼球运动与使用 "噪音通道 "推断之间的关系,以及认知老化可能对其产生的影响。年轻(18-26 岁)和年长(65-87 岁)的成年参与者阅读了可信或不可信的句子。最重要的是,读者可以通过推断一个介词(即 "到")被无意地省略或包含,从而对不可信的句子做出可信的解释。我们的研究结果表明,读者在此类句子中的固定位置与他们推断是否存在这一关键介词以得出合理解释的可能性有关。此外,与年轻人相比,我们的老年人更有可能做出这些噪声信道推断,这可能是因为他们的视觉处理能力较差,而语言经验更丰富,从而促进了这种推断。我们认为,本研究结果提供了新的实验证据,证明在阅读过程中,知觉对噪声信道推理做出了贡献。
{"title":"Eye-movements during reading and noisy-channel inference making","authors":"Michael G. Cutter ,&nbsp;Kevin B. Paterson ,&nbsp;Ruth Filik","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104513","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This novel experiment investigates the relationship between readers’ eye movements and their use of “noisy channel” inferences when reading implausible sentences, and how this might be affected by cognitive aging. Young (18–26 years) and older (65–87 years) adult participants read sentences which were either plausible or implausible. Crucially, readers could assign a plausible interpretation to the implausible sentences by inferring that a preposition (i.e., <em>to</em>) had been unintentionally omitted or included. Our results reveal that readers’ fixation locations within such sentences are associated with the likelihood of them inferring the presence or absence of this critical preposition to reach a plausible interpretation. Moreover, our older adults were more likely to make these noisy-channel inferences than the younger adults, potentially because their poorer visual processing and greater linguistic experience promote such inference-making. We propose that the present findings provide novel experimental evidence for a perceptual contribution to noisy-channel inference-making during reading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24000160/pdfft?md5=8e879ca0730868cb6c949b346b5f1163&pid=1-s2.0-S0749596X24000160-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139992405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of memory and language
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1