首页 > 最新文献

Journal of personality and social psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Wishful perceiving: A value-based bias for perception of close others. 一厢情愿的感知:基于价值的对亲密他人的认知偏差。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000482
Shir Ginosar Yaari, Dana Katsoty, Anat Bardi, Daniela Barni, Ewa Skimina, Jan Cieciuch, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Markku J Verkasalo, Ariel Knafo-Noam

Why do people not perceive their close others accurately, although they have ample information about them? We propose that one reason for such errors may be bias based on personal values. Personal values may serve as schemas defining what people see as positive, and thus affect perceptions of others' behavior, values, and traits. We propose that, in close relationships, people see others as sharing their own values. Six studies (N = 2,225; four preregistered analyses and one preregistered study) tested this bias. Perceivers reported their personal values and the perceived values, behaviors, or traits of a close other (target), while the target also reported on the same values, behaviors, or traits. Personal values significantly and positively related to perception of close others' values and behaviors, while controlling for the real targets' value/behavior. Results were replicated for spouses, romantic partners, children, parents, and friends. Some evidence also supports the idea that the bias is stronger for relationships of better quality. Implications for relationship quality are discussed, as well as implications for the adaptive properties of this bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

为什么人们虽然掌握了关于亲密他人的大量信息,却不能准确地感知他们呢?我们认为,造成这种错误的原因之一可能是基于个人价值观的偏见。个人价值观可以作为一种图式,定义人们认为积极的事物,从而影响对他人行为、价值观和特质的感知。我们认为,在亲密关系中,人们会将他人视为分享自己的价值观。六项研究(N = 2,225; 四项预先登记的分析和一项预先登记的研究)对这一偏差进行了测试。感知者报告了他们的个人价值观和亲密他人(目标)的感知价值观、行为或特征,而目标也报告了相同的价值观、行为或特征。在控制真实目标的价值观/行为的情况下,个人价值观与对亲密他人价值观和行为的感知有明显的正相关。结果在配偶、恋爱伴侣、子女、父母和朋友身上得到了验证。一些证据还支持这样一种观点,即对于质量较高的关系,偏差会更大。本文讨论了这种偏差对人际关系质量的影响,以及对其适应性的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Wishful perceiving: A value-based bias for perception of close others.","authors":"Shir Ginosar Yaari, Dana Katsoty, Anat Bardi, Daniela Barni, Ewa Skimina, Jan Cieciuch, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Markku J Verkasalo, Ariel Knafo-Noam","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000482","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspi0000482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Why do people not perceive their close others accurately, although they have ample information about them? We propose that one reason for such errors may be bias based on personal values. Personal values may serve as schemas defining what people see as positive, and thus affect perceptions of others' behavior, values, and traits. We propose that, in close relationships, people see others as sharing their own values. Six studies (<i>N</i> = 2,225; four preregistered analyses and one preregistered study) tested this bias. Perceivers reported their personal values and the perceived values, behaviors, or traits of a close other (target), while the target also reported on the same values, behaviors, or traits. Personal values significantly and positively related to perception of close others' values and behaviors, while controlling for the real targets' value/behavior. Results were replicated for spouses, romantic partners, children, parents, and friends. Some evidence also supports the idea that the bias is stronger for relationships of better quality. Implications for relationship quality are discussed, as well as implications for the adaptive properties of this bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"335-366"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142829023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations of personality trait level and change with mortality risk in 11 longitudinal studies. 11项纵向研究中人格特质水平和变化与死亡风险的关系。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000531
Emily C Willroth, Emorie Beck, Tomiko B Yoneda, Christopher R Beam, Ian J Deary, Johanna Drewelies, Denis Gerstorf, Martijn Huisman, Mindy J Katz, Richard B Lipton, Graciela Muniz Tererra, Nancy L Pedersen, Chandra A Reynolds, Avron Spiro, Nicholas A Turiano, Sherry Willis, Daniel K Mroczek, Eileen K Graham

People who are higher in conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness and lower in neuroticism tend to live longer. The present research tested the hypothesis that personality trait change in middle and older adulthood would also be associated with mortality risk, above and beyond personality trait level. Personality trait change may causally influence mortality risk through corresponding changes in health behaviors, social processes, and stress experience. Alternatively, personality trait change may be a marker of successful or unsuccessful adaptation to life circumstances, which in turn influences mortality risk, or shared risk factors may impact personality trait change and mortality risk. In the latter case, personality trait change may serve as a "psychosocial vital sign" pointing toward increased risk. In 11 samples of middle-aged and older adults (combined N = 32,348), we used multilevel growth curve models to estimate personality trait level and personality trait change across three to 11 measurement occasions spanning 6-43 years. Next, we used Cox proportional hazards models to test whether personality trait level and personality trait change were associated with mortality risk. Higher conscientiousness (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83), extraversion (HR = 0.93), and agreeableness (HR = 0.88) were associated with longer survival while higher neuroticism was associated with shorter survival (HR = 1.22). In contrast to personality trait level, we found limited evidence for associations between personality trait change and mortality risk. We discuss conceptual and methodological implications of the present findings that may guide future research on associations between personality trait change, health, and mortality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

尽责性、外向性和亲和性较高、神经质程度较低的人往往寿命更长。目前的研究验证了一个假设,即中年和老年人格特质的变化也会与死亡风险相关,这超出了人格特质的水平。人格特质的改变可能通过健康行为、社会过程和压力经历的相应改变而对死亡风险产生因果影响。或者,人格特质的改变可能是成功或不成功适应生活环境的标志,这反过来影响死亡风险,或者共同的风险因素可能影响人格特质的改变和死亡风险。在后一种情况下,人格特质的改变可能是指向风险增加的“心理社会生命体征”。在11个样本中(N = 32,348),我们使用多层生长曲线模型估计人格特质水平和人格特质变化在3到11个测量时段跨度6-43年。接下来,我们使用Cox比例风险模型来检验人格特质水平和人格特质改变是否与死亡风险相关。较高的责任心(风险比[HR] = 0.83)、外向性(风险比[HR] = 0.93)和亲和性(风险比[HR] = 0.88)与较长的生存期相关,而较高的神经质与较短的生存期相关(风险比[HR] = 1.22)。与人格特质水平相比,我们发现有限的证据表明人格特质改变与死亡风险之间存在关联。我们讨论了本研究的概念和方法意义,这些发现可能指导未来关于人格特质改变、健康和死亡率之间关系的研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Associations of personality trait level and change with mortality risk in 11 longitudinal studies.","authors":"Emily C Willroth, Emorie Beck, Tomiko B Yoneda, Christopher R Beam, Ian J Deary, Johanna Drewelies, Denis Gerstorf, Martijn Huisman, Mindy J Katz, Richard B Lipton, Graciela Muniz Tererra, Nancy L Pedersen, Chandra A Reynolds, Avron Spiro, Nicholas A Turiano, Sherry Willis, Daniel K Mroczek, Eileen K Graham","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000531","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People who are higher in conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness and lower in neuroticism tend to live longer. The present research tested the hypothesis that personality trait change in middle and older adulthood would also be associated with mortality risk, above and beyond personality trait level. Personality trait change may causally influence mortality risk through corresponding changes in health behaviors, social processes, and stress experience. Alternatively, personality trait change may be a marker of successful or unsuccessful adaptation to life circumstances, which in turn influences mortality risk, or shared risk factors may impact personality trait change and mortality risk. In the latter case, personality trait change may serve as a \"psychosocial vital sign\" pointing toward increased risk. In 11 samples of middle-aged and older adults (combined <i>N</i> = 32,348), we used multilevel growth curve models to estimate personality trait level and personality trait change across three to 11 measurement occasions spanning 6-43 years. Next, we used Cox proportional hazards models to test whether personality trait level and personality trait change were associated with mortality risk. Higher conscientiousness (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83), extraversion (HR = 0.93), and agreeableness (HR = 0.88) were associated with longer survival while higher neuroticism was associated with shorter survival (HR = 1.22). In contrast to personality trait level, we found limited evidence for associations between personality trait change and mortality risk. We discuss conceptual and methodological implications of the present findings that may guide future research on associations between personality trait change, health, and mortality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"392-409"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ideas worth spreading? When, how, and for whom information load hurts online talks' popularity. 值得传播的想法?信息负荷何时、如何、为谁损害网络谈话的受欢迎程度。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000430
Amir Sepehri, Rod Duclos, Nasir Haghighi

What makes cultural products such as edutainment (i.e., online talks) successful versus not? Asked differently, which characteristics make certain addresses more (vs. less) appealing? Across 12 field and lab studies, we explore when, why, and for whom the information load carried in TED talks causes them to gain (vs. lose) popularity. First and foremost, we uncover a negative effect whereby increases in the number of topics broached in a talk (i.e., information load) hurt viewer adoption. The cause? Processing disfluency. As information load soars, content becomes more difficult to process, which in turn reduces interest. Probing process further, we show this effect fades among audience members with greater need for cognition, a personality trait marking a penchant for deep and broad information processing. Similarly, the effect fades among edutainment viewers favoring education goals (i.e., cognitive enrichment) whereas it amplifies among those favoring entertainment (i.e., hedonic pleasure). Our investigation also documents the counterintuitiveness of our findings (i.e., how individuals mispredict which talks they would actually [dis]like). From these results, we derive theoretical insights for processing fluency research and the psychology of cultural products adoption (i.e., we weigh in on when, why, and for whom fluency has favorable vs. unfavorable downstream effects). We also derive prescriptive insights for (a) players of the edutainment industry whose very business hinges on curating appealing content (e.g., TED, Talks@Google, The Moth, Big Think, Spotify) and (b) communicators of all creeds wishing to broaden their reach and appeal (e.g., professors, scientists, politicians, journalists, bloggers, podcasters, content editors, online community managers). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

是什么让寓教于乐(即在线讲座)等文化产品成功与否?换句话说,是哪些特征使某些演讲更具(或更少)吸引力?通过 12 项实地研究和实验室研究,我们探讨了 TED 演讲中的信息负荷何时、为何以及对谁而言会导致演讲受欢迎(或不受欢迎)。首先,我们发现了一种负面效应,即演讲中涉及的话题数量增加(即信息量增加)会影响观众的接受程度。原因何在?处理不流畅。随着信息量的增加,内容变得更加难以处理,这反过来又会降低观众的兴趣。在进一步探究过程中,我们发现这种效应在认知需求较高的观众中会逐渐减弱,而认知需求较高是一种性格特征,标志着他们对深度和广度信息处理的偏好。同样,这种效应在偏向教育目标(即认知丰富)的寓教于乐观众中会减弱,而在偏向娱乐目标(即享乐愉悦)的观众中则会放大。我们的调查还记录了调查结果的反直觉性(即个人如何错误地预测他们实际上会[不]喜欢哪些谈话)。从这些结果中,我们得出了处理流畅性研究和文化产品采用心理学的理论见解(即,我们权衡了流畅性何时、为何以及对谁产生有利或不利的下游效应)。我们还为以下两类人提供了指导性见解:(a)寓教于乐行业的参与者,他们的业务依赖于策划有吸引力的内容(如TED、Talks@Google、The Moth、Big Think、Spotify);(b)希望扩大影响力和吸引力的各种传播者(如教授、科学家、政治家、记者、博主、播客、内容编辑、在线社区经理)。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Ideas worth spreading? When, how, and for whom information load hurts online talks' popularity.","authors":"Amir Sepehri, Rod Duclos, Nasir Haghighi","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000430","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspa0000430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What makes cultural products such as edutainment (i.e., online talks) successful versus not? Asked differently, which characteristics make certain addresses more (vs. less) appealing? Across 12 field and lab studies, we explore when, why, and for whom the information load carried in TED talks causes them to gain (vs. lose) popularity. First and foremost, we uncover a negative effect whereby increases in the number of topics broached in a talk (i.e., information load) hurt viewer adoption. The cause? Processing disfluency. As information load soars, content becomes more difficult to process, which in turn reduces interest. Probing process further, we show this effect fades among audience members with greater need for cognition, a personality trait marking a penchant for deep and broad information processing. Similarly, the effect fades among edutainment viewers favoring education goals (i.e., cognitive enrichment) whereas it amplifies among those favoring entertainment (i.e., hedonic pleasure). Our investigation also documents the counterintuitiveness of our findings (i.e., how individuals mispredict which talks they would actually [dis]like). From these results, we derive theoretical insights for processing fluency research and the psychology of cultural products adoption (i.e., we weigh in on when, why, and for whom fluency has favorable vs. unfavorable downstream effects). We also derive <i>prescriptive</i> insights for (a) players of the edutainment industry whose very business hinges on curating appealing content (e.g., TED, Talks@Google, The Moth, Big Think, Spotify) and (b) communicators of all creeds wishing to broaden their reach and appeal (e.g., professors, scientists, politicians, journalists, bloggers, podcasters, content editors, online community managers). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"281-299"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unlocking the bitter potential of nostalgia: Covariation between and causal effects of nostalgia on envy. 释放怀旧的苦涩潜能:怀旧对嫉妒的共变及因果效应。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000529
David B Newman, Paul K Lutz, Matthew E Sachs, John M Zelenski

Nostalgia is a sentimental longing for the past that is experienced across people from various cultures and across the lifespan. Though nostalgia has typically been conceptualized as a mixed emotion, prior research has primarily focused on positive effects. We hypothesized that nostalgia can additionally have certain negative effects. In particular, nostalgia shares certain features with envy, a negative emotion defined as a resentful longing for another person's fortune, luck, possessions, or attributes. We predicted that nostalgia would be positively related to envy and that nostalgia would increase feelings of envy. In two cross-sectional studies (Studies 1 and 2; N = 2,588), nostalgia was positively related to envy between individuals and after controlling for demographics and relevant personality traits. In three daily diary studies (Studies 3-5; N = 298; 3,454 daily reports), daily states of nostalgia were positively related to daily feelings of envy and after controlling for daily negative events. Lagged analyses indicated bidirectional effects, such that nostalgia predicted greater envy on the following day and vice versa. In two experiments (Studies 6 and 7; N = 513), nostalgia increased feelings of envy. This effect was mediated by feelings of regret and envy for a past self, suggesting that nostalgia makes people feel envious of their past self which leads to general feelings of envy. These studies point to a novel bitter effect of nostalgia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

怀旧是一种对过去的感伤的渴望,来自不同文化背景的人在一生中都会经历这种渴望。虽然怀旧通常被定义为一种混合情绪,但之前的研究主要集中在积极影响上。我们假设怀旧还会产生一定的负面影响。特别是,怀旧和嫉妒有一些共同的特征,嫉妒是一种消极的情绪,被定义为对另一个人的财富、运气、财产或属性的怨恨的渴望。我们预测怀旧与嫉妒呈正相关,怀旧会增加嫉妒的感觉。在两项横断面研究中(研究1和2;N = 2588),在控制人口统计学和相关人格特征后,怀旧与个体之间的嫉妒呈正相关。在三项日常日记研究中(研究3-5;N = 298;3,454份每日报告),每日的怀旧状态与每日的嫉妒感呈正相关,在控制了每日的负面事件之后。滞后分析显示了双向效应,比如怀旧预示着第二天会更嫉妒,反之亦然。在两个实验中(研究6和7;N = 513),怀旧增加了嫉妒的感觉。这种效应是由对过去的自己的后悔和嫉妒感所介导的,这表明怀旧使人们对过去的自己产生嫉妒,从而导致普遍的嫉妒感。这些研究指出了怀旧带来的一种新的痛苦效应。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Unlocking the bitter potential of nostalgia: Covariation between and causal effects of nostalgia on envy.","authors":"David B Newman, Paul K Lutz, Matthew E Sachs, John M Zelenski","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000529","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nostalgia is a sentimental longing for the past that is experienced across people from various cultures and across the lifespan. Though nostalgia has typically been conceptualized as a mixed emotion, prior research has primarily focused on positive effects. We hypothesized that nostalgia can additionally have certain negative effects. In particular, nostalgia shares certain features with envy, a negative emotion defined as a resentful longing for another person's fortune, luck, possessions, or attributes. We predicted that nostalgia would be positively related to envy and that nostalgia would increase feelings of envy. In two cross-sectional studies (Studies 1 and 2; <i>N</i> = 2,588), nostalgia was positively related to envy between individuals and after controlling for demographics and relevant personality traits. In three daily diary studies (Studies 3-5; <i>N</i> = 298; 3,454 daily reports), daily states of nostalgia were positively related to daily feelings of envy and after controlling for daily negative events. Lagged analyses indicated bidirectional effects, such that nostalgia predicted greater envy on the following day and vice versa. In two experiments (Studies 6 and 7; <i>N</i> = 513), nostalgia increased feelings of envy. This effect was mediated by feelings of regret and envy for a past self, suggesting that nostalgia makes people feel envious of their past self which leads to general feelings of envy. These studies point to a novel bitter effect of nostalgia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"438-455"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Active during childhood: Undercontrolled or extraverted in late adolescence? A longitudinal study distinguishing different conceptions of childhood activity. 儿童期活跃:青春期后期控制不足还是外向?一项区分儿童活动不同概念的纵向研究。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000543
Silje Baardstu, Evalill B Karevold, Oliver P John, Filip De Fruyt, Tilmann von Soest

The role of childhood activity level in personality development is still poorly understood. Using data from a prospective study following 939 children from age 1.5 to 16.5 years, this study examined whether prospective associations of childhood activity with subsequent personality ratings in adolescence differ across two conceptualizations of childhood activity: energetic activity (defined by energy, vigor, and tempo) versus dysregulated activity (distractibility, hyperactivity, and poor self-regulation). We assessed energetic activity development (using latent growth curve modeling) at ages 1.5-8.5 years using the Activity scale from the Emotionality, Activity, and Sociability Temperament Survey, and dysregulated activity at age 8.5 using the Hyperactivity-Inattention scale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. We then used these two kinds of activity measures (mother-reported) to predict personality self-descriptions on the Big Five Inventory 8 years later. Personality traits were first regressed on mean levels of energetic and dysregulated activity at age 8.5 years and subsequently regressed on the growth factors of energetic activity development. Results showed mean-level changes in the entire sample as energetic activity decreased by more than 1 SD across childhood (i.e., -0.18 SD per year). Energetic activity at age 8.5 positively predicted higher levels of both the Big Five extraversion domain and the self-discipline facet of conscientiousness at age 16.5. In contrast, dysregulated activity at age 8.5 predicted lower levels of both conscientiousness and agreeableness. The findings advocate for a distinction between energetic and dysregulated activity in temperament and personality theories, addressing inconsistencies in previous research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

人们对童年活动水平在人格发展中的作用还知之甚少。本研究利用一项前瞻性研究的数据,对 939 名 1.5 岁至 16.5 岁的儿童进行了跟踪调查,研究了两种儿童活动概念:精力充沛的活动(定义为精力、活力和节奏)与活动失调(注意力分散、多动和自我调节能力差),儿童活动与青春期人格评分的前瞻性关联是否存在差异。我们使用 "情绪、活动和社交能力气质调查 "中的 "活动量表 "评估了 1.5-8.5 岁儿童的精力充沛活动发展情况(使用潜伏生长曲线模型),并使用 "优势与困难问卷 "中的 "多动-注意力不集中量表 "评估了 8.5 岁儿童的活动失调情况。然后,我们利用这两种活动测量(母亲报告)来预测 8 年后大五量表中的人格自我描述。人格特质首先与 8.5 岁时精力充沛和活动失调的平均水平进行回归,然后与精力充沛活动发展的成长因素进行回归。结果显示,整个样本的平均水平发生了变化,整个童年期的精力充沛活动减少了 1 SD 以上(即每年-0.18 SD)。8.5 岁时的精力充沛可以正向预测 16.5 岁时大五外向性领域和自觉性自律方面的较高水平。相比之下,8.5 岁时活动失调则预示着较低的自觉性和合群性水平。研究结果主张在气质和人格理论中区分精力充沛和活动失调,解决了以往研究中的不一致之处。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Active during childhood: Undercontrolled or extraverted in late adolescence? A longitudinal study distinguishing different conceptions of childhood activity.","authors":"Silje Baardstu, Evalill B Karevold, Oliver P John, Filip De Fruyt, Tilmann von Soest","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000543","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of childhood activity level in personality development is still poorly understood. Using data from a prospective study following 939 children from age 1.5 to 16.5 years, this study examined whether prospective associations of childhood activity with subsequent personality ratings in adolescence differ across two conceptualizations of childhood activity: energetic activity (defined by energy, vigor, and tempo) versus dysregulated activity (distractibility, hyperactivity, and poor self-regulation). We assessed energetic activity development (using latent growth curve modeling) at ages 1.5-8.5 years using the Activity scale from the Emotionality, Activity, and Sociability Temperament Survey, and dysregulated activity at age 8.5 using the Hyperactivity-Inattention scale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. We then used these two kinds of activity measures (mother-reported) to predict personality self-descriptions on the Big Five Inventory 8 years later. Personality traits were first regressed on mean levels of energetic and dysregulated activity at age 8.5 years and subsequently regressed on the growth factors of energetic activity development. Results showed mean-level changes in the entire sample as energetic activity decreased by more than 1 <i>SD</i> across childhood (i.e., -0.18 <i>SD</i> per year). Energetic activity at age 8.5 positively predicted higher levels of both the Big Five extraversion domain and the self-discipline facet of conscientiousness at age 16.5. In contrast, dysregulated activity at age 8.5 predicted lower levels of both conscientiousness and agreeableness. The findings advocate for a distinction between energetic and dysregulated activity in temperament and personality theories, addressing inconsistencies in previous research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"456-475"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Group information enhances recognition of both learned and unlearned face appearances. 群体信息可增强对已学习和未学习人脸外观的识别。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000420
Maayan Trzewik, Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein, Galit Yovel, Nira Liberman

Are people better at recognizing individuals of more relevant groups, such as ingroup compared to outgroup members or high-status compared to low-status individuals? Previous studies that associated faces with group information found a robust effect of group on face recognition but only tested it using the same images presented during the learning phase. They therefore cannot tell whether group information enhances encoding of the specific image presented during learning or encoding of the person who appears in it, which should generalize to other images of that person. In addition, the measures used in these studies do not sufficiently distinguish between sensitivity and response bias. In this article, we addressed these limitations and examined in three experiments the effect of group membership (Experiments 1 and 2) and social status (Experiment 3) on face recognition. In all experiments, we assessed recognition of both learned and unlearned views of the learned faces. Our results show improved recognition of ingroup members compared to outgroup members and of individuals of high-status groups compared to low-status groups for both learned and unlearned views. These effects emerged also when we used measures of memory accuracy that adequately control for response bias. These findings highlight the importance of group and status information in person recognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

人们是否更善于识别更相关群体中的个体,比如内群体成员相对于外群体成员,或者高地位个体相对于低地位个体?以往将人脸与群体信息相关联的研究发现,群体对人脸识别有很强的影响,但这些研究仅使用学习阶段呈现的相同图像进行测试。因此,他们无法判断群体信息是增强了对学习阶段呈现的特定图像的编码,还是增强了对图像中出现的人的编码,而这种编码应该会推广到该人的其他图像。此外,这些研究中使用的测量方法不能充分区分敏感性和反应偏差。在本文中,我们针对这些局限性,在三个实验中考察了群体成员身份(实验 1 和 2)和社会地位(实验 3)对人脸识别的影响。在所有实验中,我们都评估了对所学人脸的学习视图和未学习视图的识别。我们的结果表明,与外群体成员相比,内群体成员的识别能力更强;与低社会地位群体相比,高社会地位群体成员的识别能力更强。当我们使用能充分控制反应偏差的记忆准确性测量方法时,这些效应也会出现。这些发现凸显了群体和地位信息在人物识别中的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Group information enhances recognition of both learned and unlearned face appearances.","authors":"Maayan Trzewik, Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein, Galit Yovel, Nira Liberman","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000420","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspa0000420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Are people better at recognizing individuals of more relevant groups, such as ingroup compared to outgroup members or high-status compared to low-status individuals? Previous studies that associated faces with group information found a robust effect of group on face recognition but only tested it using the same images presented during the learning phase. They therefore cannot tell whether group information enhances encoding of the specific image presented during learning or encoding of the person who appears in it, which should generalize to other images of that person. In addition, the measures used in these studies do not sufficiently distinguish between sensitivity and response bias. In this article, we addressed these limitations and examined in three experiments the effect of group membership (Experiments 1 and 2) and social status (Experiment 3) on face recognition. In all experiments, we assessed recognition of both learned and unlearned views of the learned faces. Our results show improved recognition of ingroup members compared to outgroup members and of individuals of high-status groups compared to low-status groups for both learned and unlearned views. These effects emerged also when we used measures of memory accuracy that adequately control for response bias. These findings highlight the importance of group and status information in person recognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"262-280"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are women really (not) more talkative than men? A registered report of binary gender similarities/differences in daily word use. 女人真的(不是)比男人更健谈吗?一篇关于日常词汇使用中二元性别异同的记录报告。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000534
Colin A Tidwell, Alexander F Danvers, Valeria A Pfeifer, Danielle B Abel, Eva Alisic, Andrew Beer, Sabrina J Bierstetel, Kathryn L Bollich-Ziegler, Michelle Bruni, William R Calabrese, Christine Chiarello, Burcu Demiray, Sona Dimidjian, Karen L Fingerman, Maximilian Haas, Deanna M Kaplan, Yijung K Kim, Goran Knezevic, Ljiljana B Lazarevic, Minxia Luo, Alessandra Macbeth, Joseph H Manson, Jennifer S Mascaro, Christina Metcalf, Kyle S Minor, Suzanne Moseley, Angelina J Polsinelli, Charles L Raison, James K Rilling, Megan L Robbins, David Sbarra, Richard B Slatcher, Jessie Sun, Mira Vasileva, Simine Vazire, Matthias R Mehl

Women are widely assumed to be more talkative than men. Challenging this assumption, Mehl et al. (2007) provided empirical evidence that men and women do not differ significantly in their daily word use, speaking about 16,000 words per day (WPD) each. However, concerns were raised that their sample was too small to yield generalizable estimates and too age and context homogeneous to permit inferences beyond college students. This registered report replicated and extended the previous study of binary gender differences in daily word use to address these concerns. Across 2,197 participants (more than five-fold the original sample size), pooled over 22 samples (631,030 ambient audio recordings), men spoke on average 11,950 WPD and women 13,349 WPD, with very large individual differences (< 100 to > 120,000 WPD). The estimated gender difference (1,073 WPD; d = 0.13; 95% CrI [316, 1,824]) was about twice as large as in the original study. Smaller differences emerged among adolescent (513 WPD), emerging adult (841 WPD), and older adult (-788 WPD) participants, but a substantially larger difference emerged for participants in early and middle adulthood (3,275 WPD; d = 0.32). Despite the considerable sample size(s), all estimates carried large statistical uncertainty and, except for the gender difference in early and middle adulthood, provide inconclusive evidence regarding whether the two genders ultimately speak a practically equivalent number of WPD, based on the preregistered ± 1,000 WPD regions of practical equivalence criterion. Experienced stress had no meaningful effect on the gender difference, and no clear pattern emerged as to whether the gender difference is accentuated for subjectively rated compared with objectively observed talkativeness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

人们普遍认为女性比男性更健谈。Mehl等人(2007)对这一假设提出了挑战,他们提供了经验证据,证明男性和女性在日常词汇使用上没有显著差异,每人每天大约说16000个单词。然而,有人担心,他们的样本太小,无法得出概括的估计,年龄和背景也太同质,无法对大学生以外的人进行推断。本注册报告复制并扩展了之前关于日常词汇使用中的二元性别差异的研究,以解决这些问题。在2197名参与者(超过原始样本量的五倍)中,汇集了22个样本(631,030个环境音频记录),男性平均说话11,950个WPD,女性平均说话13,349个WPD,个体差异非常大(< 100到bbbb12万WPD)。估计的性别差异(1,073 WPD;D = 0.13;95% CrI[316,1824])约为原始研究的两倍。在青少年(513个WPD)、刚成年(841个WPD)和老年人(-788个WPD)参与者中出现了较小的差异,但在成年早期和中期参与者中出现了显著较大的差异(3,275个WPD;D = 0.32)。尽管样本量相当大,但所有的估计都有很大的统计不确定性,除了成年早期和中期的性别差异外,基于预登记的±1000个WPD区域的实际等效标准,关于两种性别最终是否会说实际相等的WPD数量,提供了不确定的证据。经历过的压力对性别差异没有显著影响,也没有明确的模式显示主观评价与客观观察的健谈性是否会加剧性别差异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Are women really (not) more talkative than men? A registered report of binary gender similarities/differences in daily word use.","authors":"Colin A Tidwell, Alexander F Danvers, Valeria A Pfeifer, Danielle B Abel, Eva Alisic, Andrew Beer, Sabrina J Bierstetel, Kathryn L Bollich-Ziegler, Michelle Bruni, William R Calabrese, Christine Chiarello, Burcu Demiray, Sona Dimidjian, Karen L Fingerman, Maximilian Haas, Deanna M Kaplan, Yijung K Kim, Goran Knezevic, Ljiljana B Lazarevic, Minxia Luo, Alessandra Macbeth, Joseph H Manson, Jennifer S Mascaro, Christina Metcalf, Kyle S Minor, Suzanne Moseley, Angelina J Polsinelli, Charles L Raison, James K Rilling, Megan L Robbins, David Sbarra, Richard B Slatcher, Jessie Sun, Mira Vasileva, Simine Vazire, Matthias R Mehl","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000534","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000534","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women are widely assumed to be more talkative than men. Challenging this assumption, Mehl et al. (2007) provided empirical evidence that men and women do not differ significantly in their daily word use, speaking about 16,000 words per day (WPD) each. However, concerns were raised that their sample was too small to yield generalizable estimates and too age and context homogeneous to permit inferences beyond college students. This registered report replicated and extended the previous study of binary gender differences in daily word use to address these concerns. Across 2,197 participants (more than five-fold the original sample size), pooled over 22 samples (631,030 ambient audio recordings), men spoke on average 11,950 WPD and women 13,349 WPD, with very large individual differences (< 100 to > 120,000 WPD). The estimated gender difference (1,073 WPD; <i>d</i> = 0.13; 95% CrI [316, 1,824]) was about twice as large as in the original study. Smaller differences emerged among adolescent (513 WPD), emerging adult (841 WPD), and older adult (-788 WPD) participants, but a substantially larger difference emerged for participants in early and middle adulthood (3,275 WPD; <i>d</i> = 0.32). Despite the considerable sample size(s), all estimates carried large statistical uncertainty and, except for the gender difference in early and middle adulthood, provide inconclusive evidence regarding whether the two genders ultimately speak a practically equivalent number of WPD, based on the preregistered ± 1,000 WPD regions of practical equivalence criterion. Experienced stress had no meaningful effect on the gender difference, and no clear pattern emerged as to whether the gender difference is accentuated for subjectively rated compared with objectively observed talkativeness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"367-391"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Compassionate love and beneficence in the family. 家庭中的仁爱和恩惠。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000479
Beverley Fehr

Compassionate love, generally defined as giving oneself for the good of another, has been receiving increased attention, especially in the context of romantic relationships. The purpose of the present research was to examine compassionate love "where it begins," namely, in the family. Seven studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that compassionate love would be correlated with various kinds of beneficence in familial relationships, including parent-child (Studies 1 and 2) and adult child-parent relationships (Studies 3-7). Levels of compassionate love and beneficence varied somewhat, depending on the gender of the parent and the child (e.g., adult children reported more compassionate love for their mother than their father). Across relationships, there was strong support for the main prediction that compassionate love would be associated with beneficence, such as willingness to sacrifice, responsive caregiving, and the provision of support. However, it was not the case that compassionate love was negatively associated with variables that were expected to be antithetical to beneficence (e.g., caregiving motivated by obligation). It was concluded that it is important to promote compassionate love where it begins-in the home-given its strong associations with other-oriented, prosocial motivations and behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

怜悯之爱通常被定义为为了他人的利益而奉献自己,它已受到越来越多的关注,尤其是在恋爱关系中。本研究的目的是探讨 "始于 "家庭的同情之爱。本研究共进行了七项研究,以验证以下假设:在家庭关系中,包括亲子关系(研究 1 和 2)和成年子女与父母的关系(研究 3-7),同情之爱会与各种恩惠相关。根据父母和子女的性别不同,怜悯之爱和恩惠的程度也有所不同(例如,成年子女对母亲的怜悯之爱多于对父亲的怜悯之爱)。在各种关系中,同情之爱与恩惠相关的主要预测得到了强有力的支持,如愿意牺牲、有求必应的照顾和提供支持。然而,同情之爱与预期与施惠相反的变量(如以义务为动机的护理)负相关的情况并不存在。研究得出结论,鉴于怜悯之爱与以他人为导向的亲社会动机和行为密切相关,因此必须从家庭开始促进怜悯之爱。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Compassionate love and beneficence in the family.","authors":"Beverley Fehr","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000479","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspi0000479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compassionate love, generally defined as giving oneself for the good of another, has been receiving increased attention, especially in the context of romantic relationships. The purpose of the present research was to examine compassionate love \"where it begins,\" namely, in the family. Seven studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that compassionate love would be correlated with various kinds of beneficence in familial relationships, including parent-child (Studies 1 and 2) and adult child-parent relationships (Studies 3-7). Levels of compassionate love and beneficence varied somewhat, depending on the gender of the parent and the child (e.g., adult children reported more compassionate love for their mother than their father). Across relationships, there was strong support for the main prediction that compassionate love would be associated with beneficence, such as willingness to sacrifice, responsive caregiving, and the provision of support. However, it was not the case that compassionate love was negatively associated with variables that were expected to be antithetical to beneficence (e.g., caregiving motivated by obligation). It was concluded that it is important to promote compassionate love where it begins-in the home-given its strong associations with other-oriented, prosocial motivations and behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"314-334"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Values and stress: Examining the relations between values and general and domain-specific stress in two longitudinal studies. 价值观与压力:在两项纵向研究中考察价值观与一般压力和特定领域压力之间的关系。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000535
Jing Luo, Emily C Willroth

Stress experiences have been found to vary at both the interindividual and intraindividual levels. The present study investigated the concurrent and longitudinal associations between values and stress at both the between-person and the within-person levels. We considered multiple aspects of stress, including self-reported stressor exposure and perceived stress, as well as general and domain-specific stress. In Study 1, data were drawn from the Midlife in the United States (N = 3,905) to test the between-person concurrent and prospective relations between values, changes in values, and general and domain-specific perceived stress. In Study 2, data from the Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (N = 13,940) were used to examine the associations between values and general and domain-specific self-reported stressor exposure and perceived stress at the between- and within-person levels. The results supported meaningful associations between values and individual differences in self-reported stressor exposure and perceived stress. In general, growth-oriented values consistently displayed negative relations to perceived stress, especially in the job domain. Social-focused values also showed negative associations with stress experiences. After controlling for between-person variance, temporal relations were also found between values and stress at the within-person level, with the pattern varying across types and domains of stress. Findings from the present study provide us with insights into the interindividual and intraindividual processes of values and stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

研究发现,压力体验在个体间和个体内都存在差异。本研究从个体间和个体内两个层面调查了价值观与压力之间的并发和纵向关联。我们考虑了压力的多个方面,包括自我报告的压力暴露和感知压力,以及一般和特定领域的压力。在研究 1 中,数据来自美国中年调查(N = 3,905),以检验价值观、价值观变化、一般和特定领域感知压力之间的人际并发和前瞻性关系。在研究 2 中,我们使用了社会科学纵向互联网研究(N = 13,940)中的数据,在人与人之间和人与人之间的层面上检验了价值观与一般和特定领域自我报告的压力暴露和感知压力之间的关系。结果表明,价值观与自我报告的压力暴露和感知压力的个体差异之间存在有意义的联系。一般来说,成长型价值观与感知到的压力之间始终存在负相关,尤其是在工作领域。注重社会的价值观也与压力体验呈负相关。在控制了人与人之间的差异后,在人与人之间的层面上也发现了价值观与压力之间的时间关系,不同类型和领域的压力模式也有所不同。本研究的结果为我们提供了关于价值观和压力的个体间和个体内过程的见解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Values and stress: Examining the relations between values and general and domain-specific stress in two longitudinal studies.","authors":"Jing Luo, Emily C Willroth","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000535","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000535","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress experiences have been found to vary at both the interindividual and intraindividual levels. The present study investigated the concurrent and longitudinal associations between values and stress at both the between-person and the within-person levels. We considered multiple aspects of stress, including self-reported stressor exposure and perceived stress, as well as general and domain-specific stress. In Study 1, data were drawn from the Midlife in the United States (<i>N</i> = 3,905) to test the between-person concurrent and prospective relations between values, changes in values, and general and domain-specific perceived stress. In Study 2, data from the Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (<i>N</i> = 13,940) were used to examine the associations between values and general and domain-specific self-reported stressor exposure and perceived stress at the between- and within-person levels. The results supported meaningful associations between values and individual differences in self-reported stressor exposure and perceived stress. In general, growth-oriented values consistently displayed negative relations to perceived stress, especially in the job domain. Social-focused values also showed negative associations with stress experiences. After controlling for between-person variance, temporal relations were also found between values and stress at the within-person level, with the pattern varying across types and domains of stress. Findings from the present study provide us with insights into the interindividual and intraindividual processes of values and stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"410-437"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142687331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Being in the minority boosts in-group love:Explanations and boundary conditions. 作为少数群体促进群体内的爱:解释和边界条件。
IF 7.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000485
Roman Angel Gallardo,Austin Smith,Uri Zak,Darinel Lopez,Erika Kirgios,Alex Koch
People appreciate members of their in-group, and they cooperate with them-tendencies we refer to as in-group love. Being a member of a minority (vs. majority) is a common experience that varies both between groups in a context and within a group between contexts, but how does it affect in-group love? Across six studies, we examined when and why being in the minority boosts in-group love. In Study 1, being in the minority boosted people's appreciation of various real-life in-groups but not out-groups. In Study 2, a real-life interaction between and within groups, people cooperated more with minority in-group (but not minority out-group) members. In Studies 3-6, we measured cooperation (Study 3, incentive-compatible), appreciation (Studies 4-6), and four mediators: perceived in-group distinctiveness, experienced in-group belongingness, expected in-group cooperation, and perceived in-group status. These four mediators independently and simultaneously explained why being in the minority boosted in-group love. In Studies 5 and 6, we observed two theoretical boundary conditions for the effect. The size of the effect was smaller when the minority in-group had many (vs. few) members (Study 5), and when the imbalance between the in-group and out-group was either low or high (here: 46% minority and 54% majority or 20% minority and 80% majority) rather than moderate (here: 33% minority and 67% majority). We discuss how these findings align with and build on optimal distinctiveness theory and other theoretical accounts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
人们欣赏他们内部群体的成员,并与他们合作——我们称之为内部群体之爱。作为少数群体(相对于多数群体)的一员是一种常见的经历,在同一背景下的不同群体之间以及不同背景下的群体内部都是不同的,但它是如何影响群体内的爱的呢?在六项研究中,我们研究了何时以及为什么处于少数群体会促进群体内爱。在研究1中,作为少数群体提高了人们对各种现实生活中的内群体的欣赏,而不是外群体。在研究2中,一个现实生活中的群体之间和群体内部的互动,人们与少数群体内(而不是少数群体外)的成员合作得更多。在研究3-6中,我们测量了合作(研究3,激励兼容)、欣赏(研究4-6)和四个中介:感知内群体独特性、体验内群体归属感、预期内群体合作和感知内群体地位。这四种媒介各自独立地同时解释了为什么处于少数群体会促进群体内的爱情。在研究5和6中,我们观察到两个理论边界条件的影响。当群体内的少数群体成员多(vs.少)时(研究5),当群体内和群体外的不平衡程度低或高(这里:46%的少数群体和54%的多数群体或20%的少数群体和80%的多数群体)而不是中等(这里:33%的少数群体和67%的多数群体)时,效应的大小就会小一些。我们将讨论这些发现如何与最佳独特性理论和其他理论解释相一致并建立在这些理论基础上。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Being in the minority boosts in-group love:Explanations and boundary conditions.","authors":"Roman Angel Gallardo,Austin Smith,Uri Zak,Darinel Lopez,Erika Kirgios,Alex Koch","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000485","url":null,"abstract":"People appreciate members of their in-group, and they cooperate with them-tendencies we refer to as in-group love. Being a member of a minority (vs. majority) is a common experience that varies both between groups in a context and within a group between contexts, but how does it affect in-group love? Across six studies, we examined when and why being in the minority boosts in-group love. In Study 1, being in the minority boosted people's appreciation of various real-life in-groups but not out-groups. In Study 2, a real-life interaction between and within groups, people cooperated more with minority in-group (but not minority out-group) members. In Studies 3-6, we measured cooperation (Study 3, incentive-compatible), appreciation (Studies 4-6), and four mediators: perceived in-group distinctiveness, experienced in-group belongingness, expected in-group cooperation, and perceived in-group status. These four mediators independently and simultaneously explained why being in the minority boosted in-group love. In Studies 5 and 6, we observed two theoretical boundary conditions for the effect. The size of the effect was smaller when the minority in-group had many (vs. few) members (Study 5), and when the imbalance between the in-group and out-group was either low or high (here: 46% minority and 54% majority or 20% minority and 80% majority) rather than moderate (here: 33% minority and 67% majority). We discuss how these findings align with and build on optimal distinctiveness theory and other theoretical accounts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142991823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of personality and social psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1