首页 > 最新文献

Journal of personality and social psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Mutual cooperation gives you a stake in your partner's welfare, especially if they are irreplaceable. 相互合作让你与伴侣的福祉息息相关,尤其是如果他们是不可替代的。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000470
Aleta Pleasant, Pat Barclay

Why do we care so much for friends-much more than one might predict from reciprocity alone? According to a recent theory, organisms who cooperate with each other come to have a stake in each other's well-being: A good cooperator is worth protecting-even anonymously if necessary-so they can be available to cooperate in the future. Here, we present three experiments showing that reciprocity creates a stake in a partner's well-being, such that people are willing to secretly pay to protect good cooperative partners, if doing so keeps those partners available for future interaction. Participants played five rounds of a cooperative game (Prisoner's Dilemma) and then received an opportunity to help their partner, without the partner ever knowing. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were more willing to help a cooperative partner if doing so kept that partner available for future rounds, compared to when the help simply raised the partner's earnings. This effect was specific to cooperative partners: The type of help mattered less for uncooperative partners or for recipients that participants did not directly interact with. In other words, an ongoing history of reciprocity gave people a stake in their partner's good condition but not their partner's payoff. Experiment 3 showed that participants had less stake in their partners if those partners could be easily replaced by another cooperator. These findings show that reciprocity and stake are not separate processes. Instead, even shallow reciprocity creates a deeper stake in a partner's well-being, including a willingness to help with zero expectation of recognition. Future work should examine how one's stake in partners is affected by ecological factors that affect the gains of cooperation and the ease of finding new partners. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

为什么我们会如此关心朋友--远远超出人们仅从互惠角度所预测的程度?根据最近的一项理论,相互合作的生物会对彼此的福祉产生利害关系:一个好的合作者值得保护--必要时甚至可以匿名--这样它们将来就可以合作了。在这里,我们介绍了三个实验,这些实验表明,互惠会对伙伴的福祉产生利害关系,因此,如果人们愿意暗中付出代价来保护优秀的合作者,这样他们就可以在未来的互动中继续合作。参与者进行了五轮合作游戏(囚徒困境),然后获得了一次帮助同伴的机会,而同伴却毫不知情。在实验 1 和 2 中,如果帮助合作同伴能让该同伴在今后的游戏中继续参与,那么参与者就更愿意帮助该同伴,而不是仅仅提高该同伴的收入。这种效应是针对合作搭档的:对于不合作的伙伴或参与者没有直接互动的受助者,帮助类型的影响较小。换句话说,持续的互惠历史让人们对其伙伴的良好状况产生了利害关系,而不是其伙伴的回报。实验 3 表明,如果参与者的伙伴很容易被另一个合作者取代,那么参与者与伙伴的利害关系就会减少。这些发现表明,互惠和利害关系并不是两个独立的过程。相反,即使是肤浅的互惠也会对伙伴的福祉产生更深层次的利害关系,包括在不期望得到认可的情况下提供帮助的意愿。未来的工作应该研究一个人与伙伴的利害关系如何受到影响合作收益和寻找新伙伴难易程度的生态因素的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Mutual cooperation gives you a stake in your partner's welfare, especially if they are irreplaceable.","authors":"Aleta Pleasant, Pat Barclay","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Why do we care so much for friends-much more than one might predict from reciprocity alone? According to a recent theory, organisms who cooperate with each other come to have a stake in each other's well-being: A good cooperator is worth protecting-even anonymously if necessary-so they can be available to cooperate in the future. Here, we present three experiments showing that reciprocity creates a stake in a partner's well-being, such that people are willing to secretly pay to protect good cooperative partners, if doing so keeps those partners available for future interaction. Participants played five rounds of a cooperative game (Prisoner's Dilemma) and then received an opportunity to help their partner, without the partner ever knowing. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were more willing to help a cooperative partner if doing so kept that partner available for future rounds, compared to when the help simply raised the partner's earnings. This effect was specific to cooperative partners: The type of help mattered less for uncooperative partners or for recipients that participants did not directly interact with. In other words, an ongoing history of reciprocity gave people a stake in their partner's good condition but not their partner's payoff. Experiment 3 showed that participants had less stake in their partners if those partners could be easily replaced by another cooperator. These findings show that reciprocity and stake are not separate processes. Instead, even shallow reciprocity creates a deeper stake in a partner's well-being, including a willingness to help with zero expectation of recognition. Future work should examine how one's stake in partners is affected by ecological factors that affect the gains of cooperation and the ease of finding new partners. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Network dynamics in subjective well-being and their differences across age groups. 主观幸福感的网络动态及其在不同年龄段的差异。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000533
Bernd Schaefer, Peter Haehner, Maike Luhmann

Although the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) has been examined in various studies, no consensus on its structure has yet been reached. This may be due to a neglect of the construct's dynamic aspects and domain satisfaction as a core aspect of SWB. This article aimed to overcome existing research gaps by applying network modeling to longitudinal data of 32,700 adults (24-64 years old) from the German Socioeconomic Panel to analyze within- and between-person dynamics in the structure of SWB across the lifespan. Results indicated that the relationships across SWB components differed across the investigated within- and between-person network structures. Family, work, and income satisfaction tended to be the most central domains across different levels of analysis. The relationship between life and domain satisfaction was neither solely top-down nor bottom-up but instead characterized by distinct, mostly reciprocal relationships. Furthermore, the dynamic relationships of SWB were similar across compared age groups. In sum, the results suggest that the structure of SWB differs between the within-person level and the between-person level but does not change fundamentally throughout middle adulthood. Additionally, this study demonstrates the importance of considering domain satisfaction as an essential component of SWB and that psychometric network models can advance our understanding of the structure and dynamics of SWB. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管各种研究都对主观幸福感(SWB)的结构进行了探讨,但尚未就其结构达成共识。这可能是由于忽视了该结构的动态方面以及作为主观幸福感核心方面的领域满意度。本文旨在克服现有的研究空白,对德国社会经济小组的 32,700 名成年人(24-64 岁)的纵向数据进行网络建模,分析人内和人与人之间在整个生命周期中的 SWB 结构动态。结果表明,在所调查的人内和人际网络结构中,SWB 各组成部分之间的关系各不相同。在不同的分析层次中,家庭、工作和收入满意度往往是最核心的领域。生活满意度和领域满意度之间的关系既不完全是自上而下的,也不完全是自下而上的,而是具有不同的特点,大多是互惠关系。此外,在不同年龄组之间,社会工作局的动态关系也是相似的。总之,研究结果表明,SWB 的结构在人内层面和人际层面上有所不同,但在整个中年期并没有根本性的变化。此外,本研究还证明了将领域满意度视为全部工作负担的一个重要组成部分的重要性,以及心理测量网络模型可以促进我们对全部工作负担的结构和动态的理解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Network dynamics in subjective well-being and their differences across age groups.","authors":"Bernd Schaefer, Peter Haehner, Maike Luhmann","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000533","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) has been examined in various studies, no consensus on its structure has yet been reached. This may be due to a neglect of the construct's dynamic aspects and domain satisfaction as a core aspect of SWB. This article aimed to overcome existing research gaps by applying network modeling to longitudinal data of 32,700 adults (24-64 years old) from the German Socioeconomic Panel to analyze within- and between-person dynamics in the structure of SWB across the lifespan. Results indicated that the relationships across SWB components differed across the investigated within- and between-person network structures. Family, work, and income satisfaction tended to be the most central domains across different levels of analysis. The relationship between life and domain satisfaction was neither solely top-down nor bottom-up but instead characterized by distinct, mostly reciprocal relationships. Furthermore, the dynamic relationships of SWB were similar across compared age groups. In sum, the results suggest that the structure of SWB differs between the within-person level and the between-person level but does not change fundamentally throughout middle adulthood. Additionally, this study demonstrates the importance of considering domain satisfaction as an essential component of SWB and that psychometric network models can advance our understanding of the structure and dynamics of SWB. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moderators of test-retest reliability in implicit and explicit attitudes. 内隐态度和外显态度的重测可靠性的调节因素。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000419
Jordan Axt, Eliane Roy

A great deal of research in dual-process models has been devoted to highlighting differences in the structure and function of the implicit and explicit attitude constructs. However, the two forms of attitudes can also demonstrate important shared properties, and prior work suggests that one similarity may be in factors that determine measurement reliability. To better explore this issue, Study 1 analyzed the test-retest reliability in measures of both implicit and explicit attitudes within a single study session across 75 topics (N > 35,000). Explicit attitudes had greater test-retest reliability than implicit attitudes, but each showed considerable heterogeneity across topics even when measured within a single study session. Analyses also included several candidate moderator variables, such as attitude certainty or familiarity. While results were not identical, the moderators associated with greater test-retest reliability for implicit and explicit attitudes exhibited more similarities than differences. Specifically, attitudes experienced as more distinctive, more relevant to one's self-concept, more certain, and more accessible had higher test-retest reliability for both forms of evaluation. Variation in short-term reliability for implicit and explicit attitudes was replicated in Study 2, and Study 3 revealed that topics low in short-term reliability were also lower in a longitudinal sample that completed attitude measures separated by several weeks. These results advance our understanding of each attitude construct and are consistent with a more dynamic relationship between an attitude and its measure, as even attitudes measured with high levels of conscious control could show remarkable short-term instability when assessed only minutes apart. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

双过程模型的大量研究都致力于强调内隐态度和外显态度结构和功能的差异。然而,这两种形式的态度也可以表现出重要的共同属性,先前的研究表明,其中一种相似性可能存在于决定测量可靠性的因素中。为了更好地探讨这个问题,研究 1 分析了在一个学习阶段内,对 75 个主题(样本数大于 35,000 个)的内隐态度和外显态度进行测量的重测可靠性。与内隐态度相比,外显态度的重测可靠性更高,但即使在单个研究环节中进行测量,两种态度在不同主题中也表现出相当大的异质性。分析还包括几个候选调节变量,如态度的确定性或熟悉程度。虽然结果并不完全相同,但与内隐态度和外显态度的更高测试-重测可靠性相关的调节变量表现出更多的相似性而非差异性。具体地说,被试认为更独特、与自我概念更相关、更确定和更容易接受的态度,在两种评价形式中的重测信度都更高。研究 2 复制了内隐态度和外显态度短期信度的差异,研究 3 显示,在完成相隔数周的态度测量的纵向样本中,短期信度较低的主题也较低。这些结果加深了我们对每种态度结构的理解,并与态度及其测量之间的动态关系相吻合,因为即使是有意识控制程度很高的态度,在相隔仅几分钟的评估中也会表现出显著的短期不稳定性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Moderators of test-retest reliability in implicit and explicit attitudes.","authors":"Jordan Axt, Eliane Roy","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A great deal of research in dual-process models has been devoted to highlighting differences in the structure and function of the implicit and explicit attitude constructs. However, the two forms of attitudes can also demonstrate important shared properties, and prior work suggests that one similarity may be in factors that determine measurement reliability. To better explore this issue, Study 1 analyzed the test-retest reliability in measures of both implicit and explicit attitudes within a single study session across 75 topics (<i>N</i> > 35,000). Explicit attitudes had greater test-retest reliability than implicit attitudes, but each showed considerable heterogeneity across topics even when measured within a single study session. Analyses also included several candidate moderator variables, such as attitude certainty or familiarity. While results were not identical, the moderators associated with greater test-retest reliability for implicit and explicit attitudes exhibited more similarities than differences. Specifically, attitudes experienced as more distinctive, more relevant to one's self-concept, more certain, and more accessible had higher test-retest reliability for both forms of evaluation. Variation in short-term reliability for implicit and explicit attitudes was replicated in Study 2, and Study 3 revealed that topics low in short-term reliability were also lower in a longitudinal sample that completed attitude measures separated by several weeks. These results advance our understanding of each attitude construct and are consistent with a more dynamic relationship between an attitude and its measure, as even attitudes measured with high levels of conscious control could show remarkable short-term instability when assessed only minutes apart. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A contest study to reduce attractiveness-based discrimination in social judgment. 一项竞赛研究,旨在减少社交判断中基于吸引力的歧视。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000414
Eliane Roy, Bastian Jaeger, Anthony M Evans, Kate M Turetsky, Brian A O'Shea, Michael Bang Petersen, Balbir Singh, Joshua Correll, Denise Yiran Zheng, Kirk Warren Brown, Erika L Kirgios, Linda W Chang, Edward H Chang, Jennifer R Steele, Julia Sebastien, Jennifer R Sedgewick, Amy Hackney, Rachel Cook, Xin Yang, Arin Korkmaz, Jessica J Sim, Nazia Khan, Maximilian A Primbs, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Ruddy Faure, Johan C Karremans, Luiza A Santos, Jan G Voelkel, Maddalena Marini, Jacqueline M Chen, Teneille Brown, Haewon Yoon, Carey K Morewedge, Irene Scopelliti, Neil Hester, Xi Shen, Ming Ma, Danila Medvedev, Emily G Ritchie, Chieh Lu, Yen-Ping Chang, Aishwarya Kumar, Ranjavati Banerji, Jeremy D Gretton, Landon Schnabel, Bethany A Teachman, Ariella S Kristal, Kao-Wei Chua, Jonathan B Freeman, Sean Fath, Lusine Grigoryan, M Isabelle Weißflog, Yalda Daryani, Reza Pourhosein, Stefanie K Johnson, Elsa T Chan, Samantha M Stevens, Stephen Anderson, Roger E Beaty, Sandro Rubichi, Veronica Margherita Cocco, Loris Vezzali, Calvin K Lai, Jordan R Axt

Discrimination in the evaluation of others is a key cause of social inequality around the world. However, relatively little is known about psychological interventions that can be used to prevent biased evaluations. The limited evidence that exists on these strategies is spread across many methods and populations, making it difficult to generate reliable best practices that can be effective across contexts. In the present work, we held a research contest to solicit interventions with the goal of reducing discrimination based on physical attractiveness using a hypothetical admissions task. Thirty interventions were tested across four rounds of data collection (total N > 20,000). Using a signal detection theory approach to evaluate interventions, we identified two interventions that reduced discrimination by lessening both decision noise and decision bias, while two other interventions reduced overall discrimination by only lessening noise or bias. The most effective interventions largely provided concrete strategies that directed participants' attention toward decision-relevant criteria and away from socially biasing information, though the fact that very similar interventions produced differing effects on discrimination suggests certain key characteristics that are needed for manipulations to reliably impact judgment. The effects of these four interventions on decision bias, noise, or both also replicated in a different discrimination domain, political affiliation, and generalized to populations with self-reported hiring experience. Results of the contest for decreasing attractiveness-based favoritism suggest that identifying effective routes for changing discriminatory behavior is a challenge and that greater investment is needed to develop impactful, flexible, and scalable strategies for reducing discrimination. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

对他人评价的歧视是世界各地社会不平等的一个主要原因。然而,人们对可用于防止偏见性评价的心理干预措施知之甚少。有关这些策略的有限证据分散在许多方法和人群中,因此很难产生可靠的、在不同情况下都有效的最佳实践。在本研究中,我们举办了一次研究竞赛,征集干预措施,目的是通过假定的招生任务减少基于外貌吸引力的歧视。在四轮数据收集过程中,有 30 项干预措施接受了测试(总人数大于 20,000 人)。通过信号检测理论评估干预措施,我们发现有两项干预措施通过减少决策噪音和决策偏差来减少歧视,而另外两项干预措施仅通过减少噪音或偏差来减少整体歧视。最有效的干预措施主要是提供了具体的策略,引导参与者将注意力集中在与决策相关的标准上,远离社会偏见信息,尽管非常相似的干预措施对辨别力产生了不同的影响,但这一事实表明,要使操作对判断产生可靠的影响,需要具备某些关键特征。这四种干预措施对决策偏差、噪音或两者的影响也在不同的歧视领域--政治派别--得到了复制,并推广到具有自我报告招聘经验的人群中。减少基于吸引力的偏袒的竞赛结果表明,确定改变歧视行为的有效途径是一项挑战,需要加大投资力度,以制定有影响力、灵活且可扩展的减少歧视策略。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A contest study to reduce attractiveness-based discrimination in social judgment.","authors":"Eliane Roy, Bastian Jaeger, Anthony M Evans, Kate M Turetsky, Brian A O'Shea, Michael Bang Petersen, Balbir Singh, Joshua Correll, Denise Yiran Zheng, Kirk Warren Brown, Erika L Kirgios, Linda W Chang, Edward H Chang, Jennifer R Steele, Julia Sebastien, Jennifer R Sedgewick, Amy Hackney, Rachel Cook, Xin Yang, Arin Korkmaz, Jessica J Sim, Nazia Khan, Maximilian A Primbs, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Ruddy Faure, Johan C Karremans, Luiza A Santos, Jan G Voelkel, Maddalena Marini, Jacqueline M Chen, Teneille Brown, Haewon Yoon, Carey K Morewedge, Irene Scopelliti, Neil Hester, Xi Shen, Ming Ma, Danila Medvedev, Emily G Ritchie, Chieh Lu, Yen-Ping Chang, Aishwarya Kumar, Ranjavati Banerji, Jeremy D Gretton, Landon Schnabel, Bethany A Teachman, Ariella S Kristal, Kao-Wei Chua, Jonathan B Freeman, Sean Fath, Lusine Grigoryan, M Isabelle Weißflog, Yalda Daryani, Reza Pourhosein, Stefanie K Johnson, Elsa T Chan, Samantha M Stevens, Stephen Anderson, Roger E Beaty, Sandro Rubichi, Veronica Margherita Cocco, Loris Vezzali, Calvin K Lai, Jordan R Axt","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000414","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspa0000414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Discrimination in the evaluation of others is a key cause of social inequality around the world. However, relatively little is known about psychological interventions that can be used to prevent biased evaluations. The limited evidence that exists on these strategies is spread across many methods and populations, making it difficult to generate reliable best practices that can be effective across contexts. In the present work, we held a research contest to solicit interventions with the goal of reducing discrimination based on physical attractiveness using a hypothetical admissions task. Thirty interventions were tested across four rounds of data collection (total <i>N</i> > 20,000). Using a signal detection theory approach to evaluate interventions, we identified two interventions that reduced discrimination by lessening both decision noise and decision bias, while two other interventions reduced overall discrimination by only lessening noise or bias. The most effective interventions largely provided concrete strategies that directed participants' attention toward decision-relevant criteria and away from socially biasing information, though the fact that very similar interventions produced differing effects on discrimination suggests certain key characteristics that are needed for manipulations to reliably impact judgment. The effects of these four interventions on decision bias, noise, or both also replicated in a different discrimination domain, political affiliation, and generalized to populations with self-reported hiring experience. Results of the contest for decreasing attractiveness-based favoritism suggest that identifying effective routes for changing discriminatory behavior is a challenge and that greater investment is needed to develop impactful, flexible, and scalable strategies for reducing discrimination. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The ecology of relatedness: How living around family (or not) matters. 亲缘关系生态学:与家人生活在一起(或不在一起)有多重要。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000428
Oliver Sng, Minyoung Choi, Joshua M Ackerman

How does living in an environment with many or few family relatives shape our psychology? Here, we draw upon ideas from behavioral ecology to explore the psychological effects of ecological relatedness-the prevalence of family relatives in one's environment. We present six studies, both correlational and experimental, that examine this. In general, people and populations that live in ecologies with more family relatives (Studies 1-4b), or who imagine themselves to be living in such ecologies (Studies 2/3a/3b/4b), engage in more extreme pro-group behavior (e.g., being willing to go to war for their country), hold more interdependent self-concepts, are more punishing of antisocial behaviors (e.g., support the death penalty for murder), identify themselves as more connected to and trust nearby groups (e.g., their community and neighbors) but less so distant groups (e.g., foreigners, the world), and also judge sibling incest as more morally wrong. These effects are examined across three countries (the United States, Ghana, the Philippines) and are robust to a range of controls and alternative explanations (e.g., ingroup preferences, familiarity effects, kinship intensity). The current work highlights the psychological effects of an underexamined dimension of our social ecology, provides a set of methods for studying it, and holds implications for understanding the ecological origins of a range of social behaviors and cultural differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

生活在一个有很多或很少家庭亲属的环境中会如何影响我们的心理?在此,我们借鉴行为生态学的观点,探讨生态亲缘关系--家庭亲属在环境中的普遍程度--对心理的影响。我们将介绍六项相关研究和实验研究。一般来说,生活在有更多家庭亲属的生态环境中的人(研究 1-4b),或想象自己生活在这样的生态环境中的人(研究 2/3a/3b/4b),会做出更极端的支持群体的行为(例如,愿意为自己的国家参战),持有更多相互依存的自我概念,对反社会行为的惩罚性更强(例如,支持谋杀罪的死刑),以及更愿意为自己的国家参战、支持对谋杀罪判处死刑),认为自己与周边群体(如社区和邻居)的联系更紧密,更信任周边群体,但对远处群体(如外国人、世界)的联系和信任较少,并认为兄弟姐妹乱伦在道德上是更错误的。我们在三个国家(美国、加纳和菲律宾)对这些效应进行了研究,并对一系列控制和替代解释(如内群偏好、熟悉效应、亲属关系强度)进行了稳健分析。目前的研究突出了社会生态学中一个未被充分研究的层面的心理效应,提供了一套研究方法,并对理解一系列社会行为和文化差异的生态起源具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"The ecology of relatedness: How living around family (or not) matters.","authors":"Oliver Sng, Minyoung Choi, Joshua M Ackerman","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How does living in an environment with many or few family relatives shape our psychology? Here, we draw upon ideas from behavioral ecology to explore the psychological effects of ecological relatedness-the prevalence of family relatives in one's environment. We present six studies, both correlational and experimental, that examine this. In general, people and populations that live in ecologies with more family relatives (Studies 1-4b), or who imagine themselves to be living in such ecologies (Studies 2/3a/3b/4b), engage in more extreme pro-group behavior (e.g., being willing to go to war for their country), hold more interdependent self-concepts, are more punishing of antisocial behaviors (e.g., support the death penalty for murder), identify themselves as more connected to and trust nearby groups (e.g., their community and neighbors) but less so distant groups (e.g., foreigners, the world), and also judge sibling incest as more morally wrong. These effects are examined across three countries (the United States, Ghana, the Philippines) and are robust to a range of controls and alternative explanations (e.g., ingroup preferences, familiarity effects, kinship intensity). The current work highlights the psychological effects of an underexamined dimension of our social ecology, provides a set of methods for studying it, and holds implications for understanding the ecological origins of a range of social behaviors and cultural differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linking Big Five personality traits to components of diet: A meta-analytic review. 将五大人格特质与饮食成分联系起来:荟萃分析综述。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000526
Mark S Allen, Mandira Mishra, Sarah M Tashjian, Sylvain Laborde

This research synthesis sought to determine the magnitude of associations between major personality dimensions and components of diet. A comprehensive literature search identified 49 articles (584 effect sizes; 151,750 participants) that met the inclusion criteria. Pooled mean effects were computed using inverse-variance weighted random effects meta-analysis. Mean effect sizes from 98 separate meta-analyses provided evidence that lower levels of neuroticism, r = -.05 (95% confidence interval, CI [-.09, -.01]), and higher levels of extraversion, r = .07 (95% CI [.03, .11]); openness, r = .13 (95% CI [.07, .18]); agreeableness, r = .07 (95% CI [.04, .11]); and conscientiousness, r = .12 (95% CI [.08, .16]), are associated with a healthier diet. Personality traits related to fruit and vegetable consumption; sugar intake (e.g., candy, sugary drinks); salt intake; consumption of meat, dairy, and fiber; low-fat foods; fast food and snacks; convenience foods; breakfast frequency; meal irregularity; and emotional and restrained eating. There was evidence of publication bias complicating conclusions for conscientiousness and meat eating. Random effects metaregression showed that agreeableness had a stronger positive association with healthy eating among older adults. These findings should be of interest to health care professionals developing health care services that aim to promote healthy eating. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

本研究综述旨在确定主要人格维度与饮食成分之间的关联程度。通过全面的文献检索,确定了符合纳入标准的 49 篇文章(584 个效应大小;151,750 名参与者)。采用逆方差加权随机效应荟萃分析法计算了汇总的平均效应。来自 98 项单独荟萃分析的平均效应大小证明,较低水平的神经质(r = -.05(95% 置信区间,CI [-.09, -.01])和较高水平的外向性(r = .07(95% 置信区间[.03, .11]);开放性,r = .13(95% 置信区间[.07, .18]);合意性,r = .07(95% 置信区间[.04, .11]);以及自觉性,r = .12(95% 置信区间[.08, .16])与更健康的饮食有关。人格特质与水果和蔬菜的摄入量、糖的摄入量(如糖果、含糖饮料)、盐的摄入量、肉类、奶制品和纤维的摄入量、低脂肪食品、快餐和零食、方便食品、早餐频率、进餐不规律、情绪化饮食和节制饮食有关。有证据表明,出版偏差使关于自觉性和吃肉的结论变得复杂。随机效应元回归显示,合群性与老年人的健康饮食有更强的正相关。医护人员在开发旨在促进健康饮食的医护服务时,应该对这些研究结果感兴趣。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Linking Big Five personality traits to components of diet: A meta-analytic review.","authors":"Mark S Allen, Mandira Mishra, Sarah M Tashjian, Sylvain Laborde","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research synthesis sought to determine the magnitude of associations between major personality dimensions and components of diet. A comprehensive literature search identified 49 articles (584 effect sizes; 151,750 participants) that met the inclusion criteria. Pooled mean effects were computed using inverse-variance weighted random effects meta-analysis. Mean effect sizes from 98 separate meta-analyses provided evidence that lower levels of neuroticism, <i>r</i> = -.05 (95% confidence interval, CI [-.09, -.01]), and higher levels of extraversion, <i>r</i> = .07 (95% CI [.03, .11]); openness, <i>r</i> = .13 (95% CI [.07, .18]); agreeableness, <i>r</i> = .07 (95% CI [.04, .11]); and conscientiousness, <i>r</i> = .12 (95% CI [.08, .16]), are associated with a healthier diet. Personality traits related to fruit and vegetable consumption; sugar intake (e.g., candy, sugary drinks); salt intake; consumption of meat, dairy, and fiber; low-fat foods; fast food and snacks; convenience foods; breakfast frequency; meal irregularity; and emotional and restrained eating. There was evidence of publication bias complicating conclusions for conscientiousness and meat eating. Random effects metaregression showed that agreeableness had a stronger positive association with healthy eating among older adults. These findings should be of interest to health care professionals developing health care services that aim to promote healthy eating. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extended artificial intelligence aversion: People deny humanness to artificial intelligence users. 扩展的人工智能厌恶:人们否认人工智能用户的人性。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000480
Jianning Dang, Li Liu

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are often perceived as lacking humanlike qualities, leading to a preference for human experts over AI assistance. Extending prior research on AI aversion, the current research explores the potential aversion toward those using AI to seek advice. Through eight preregistered studies (total N = 2,317) across multiple AI use scenarios, we found that people denied humanness, especially emotional capacity and human nature traits, to AI advice seekers in comparison to human advice seekers (Studies 1-5 and S1-S3). This is because people perceived less similarity between themselves and AI advice seekers (vs. human advice seekers), with a stronger mediating role of perceived similarity among individuals with greater aversion to AI (Studies 2 and S1). Dehumanization of AI advice seekers predicted less behavioral support for (Study 3) and helping intention toward (Studies S2 and S3) them and could be alleviated through anthropomorphism-related interventions, such as perceiving humanlike qualities in AI or utilizing generative AI (Studies 4 and 5). These findings represent an important theoretical step in advancing research on AI aversion and add to the ongoing discussion on the potential adverse outcomes of AI, focusing on AI users. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

人工智能(AI)工具通常被认为缺乏类似人类的品质,从而导致人们更倾向于使用人类专家而非人工智能辅助工具。目前的研究扩展了之前关于人工智能厌恶的研究,探讨了人们对使用人工智能寻求建议的潜在厌恶。通过对多个人工智能使用场景的八项预先登记研究(总人数 = 2317 人),我们发现,与人类咨询者相比,人们否认人工智能咨询者的人性,尤其是情感能力和人性特征(研究 1-5 和 S1-S3)。这是因为人们认为自己与人工智能建议寻求者(与人类建议寻求者相比)之间的相似性较低,而在对人工智能更反感的个体中,相似性的中介作用更强(研究 2 和 S1)。对人工智能建议寻求者的非人化预示着对他们的行为支持(研究 3)和帮助意向(研究 S2 和 S3)较少,可以通过拟人化相关的干预措施来缓解,如在人工智能中感知类似人类的品质或利用生成式人工智能(研究 4 和 5)。这些研究结果代表了推进人工智能厌恶研究的重要理论步骤,并为正在进行的关于人工智能潜在不良后果的讨论增添了新的内容,其重点是人工智能用户。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Extended artificial intelligence aversion: People deny humanness to artificial intelligence users.","authors":"Jianning Dang, Li Liu","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000480","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are often perceived as lacking humanlike qualities, leading to a preference for human experts over AI assistance. Extending prior research on AI aversion, the current research explores the potential aversion toward those using AI to seek advice. Through eight preregistered studies (total <i>N</i> = 2,317) across multiple AI use scenarios, we found that people denied humanness, especially emotional capacity and human nature traits, to AI advice seekers in comparison to human advice seekers (Studies 1-5 and S1-S3). This is because people perceived less similarity between themselves and AI advice seekers (vs. human advice seekers), with a stronger mediating role of perceived similarity among individuals with greater aversion to AI (Studies 2 and S1). Dehumanization of AI advice seekers predicted less behavioral support for (Study 3) and helping intention toward (Studies S2 and S3) them and could be alleviated through anthropomorphism-related interventions, such as perceiving humanlike qualities in AI or utilizing generative AI (Studies 4 and 5). These findings represent an important theoretical step in advancing research on AI aversion and add to the ongoing discussion on the potential adverse outcomes of AI, focusing on AI users. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The cross-cultural big two: A culturally decentered theoretical and measurement model for personality traits. 跨文化的两大特征:以文化为中心的人格特质理论与测量模型。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000528
Amber Gayle Thalmayer, Kendall A Mather, Gerard Saucier, Luzelle Naudé, Maria Florence, Tracey-Ann Adonis, Elizabeth N Shino, Stephen Asatsa, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Lea Z M Bächlin, David M Condon

A "big two" model has shown stronger cross-cultural replicability and links to theory than other contemporary models of personality trait structure. However, its theoretical and measurement models require better specification. We address this to create an initial English-language version of the Cross-Cultural Big Two Inventory with an empirically informed and culturally decentered approach, meaning that input from global contexts is used from the outset, without prioritizing Western perspectives. Four studies are reported: (1) Fifty-five items were identified from commonalities among 11 global lexical studies to define two factors. Communion/Social Self-Regulation captures the internalization of versus resistance to the normative codes of one's society, with components of warmth, morality, respect, industriousness, and even temper. Agency/Dynamism captures approach versus avoidance tendencies, with components of competence, confidence, fearlessness, positive mood, sociability, and surgency. (2) Items were reduced to the 45 most consistent across English-speaking contexts based on (a) frequency of use in World English corpora; (b) familiarity and exploratory factor analysis results among Africa Long Life Study participants, who were 18-year-olds from Namibia, Kenya, and South Africa (N = 2,958); and (c) distribution test statistics, exploratory factor analysis results, and test-retest reliability in online data from 13 diverse English-speaking countries (N = 63,720). (3) The 45-item Cross-Cultural Big Two Inventory was assessed psychometrically and validated against external criteria in the Africa Long Life Study samples and (4) in the online data and additionally compared to existing two-factor frameworks. The relation of the cross-cultural big two to other two-factor models and theories, its future development, and the potential and importance of culturally decentered models and inventories are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

与其他当代人格特质结构模型相比,"大二型 "模型显示出更强的跨文化可复制性以及与理论的联系。然而,其理论和测量模型需要更好的规范。为了解决这个问题,我们创建了跨文化 "大二型 "量表的英文初始版本,该版本采用了一种以经验为依据、文化去中心的方法,也就是说,从一开始就使用了来自全球背景的输入,而没有优先考虑西方的观点。现报告四项研究(1) 从 11 项全球词汇研究的共同点中确定了 55 个项目,从而定义了两个因子。共融/社会自我调节反映了对社会规范准则的内化和抵制,包括温暖、道德、尊重、勤劳甚至脾气等要素。代理/能动性则反映了接近倾向和回避倾向,包括能力、自信、无畏、积极情绪、交际能力和急躁。(2)根据(a)在世界英语语料库中的使用频率;(b)非洲长寿研究参与者(来自纳米比亚、肯尼亚和南非的 18 岁青少年,人数为 2 958 人)的熟悉程度和探索性因素分析结果;以及(c)来自 13 个不同英语国家的在线数据(人数为 63 720 人)的分布测试统计、探索性因素分析结果和测试-再测可靠性,将项目缩减为 45 个在不同英语环境中最为一致的项目。(3) 在非洲长寿研究样本和 (4) 在线数据中,根据外部标准对 45 个项目的跨文化大二量表进行了心理评估和验证,并与现有的双因素框架进行了比较。本文讨论了跨文化大二因素与其他双因素模型和理论的关系、其未来发展以及以文化为中心的模型和清单的潜力和重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"The cross-cultural big two: A culturally decentered theoretical and measurement model for personality traits.","authors":"Amber Gayle Thalmayer, Kendall A Mather, Gerard Saucier, Luzelle Naudé, Maria Florence, Tracey-Ann Adonis, Elizabeth N Shino, Stephen Asatsa, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Lea Z M Bächlin, David M Condon","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A \"big two\" model has shown stronger cross-cultural replicability and links to theory than other contemporary models of personality trait structure. However, its theoretical and measurement models require better specification. We address this to create an initial English-language version of the Cross-Cultural Big Two Inventory with an empirically informed and culturally decentered approach, meaning that input from global contexts is used from the outset, without prioritizing Western perspectives. Four studies are reported: (1) Fifty-five items were identified from commonalities among 11 global lexical studies to define two factors. Communion/Social Self-Regulation captures the internalization of versus resistance to the normative codes of one's society, with components of warmth, morality, respect, industriousness, and even temper. Agency/Dynamism captures approach versus avoidance tendencies, with components of competence, confidence, fearlessness, positive mood, sociability, and surgency. (2) Items were reduced to the 45 most consistent across English-speaking contexts based on (a) frequency of use in World English corpora; (b) familiarity and exploratory factor analysis results among Africa Long Life Study participants, who were 18-year-olds from Namibia, Kenya, and South Africa (<i>N</i> = 2,958); and (c) distribution test statistics, exploratory factor analysis results, and test-retest reliability in online data from 13 diverse English-speaking countries (<i>N</i> = 63,720). (3) The 45-item Cross-Cultural Big Two Inventory was assessed psychometrically and validated against external criteria in the Africa Long Life Study samples and (4) in the online data and additionally compared to existing two-factor frameworks. The relation of the cross-cultural big two to other two-factor models and theories, its future development, and the potential and importance of culturally decentered models and inventories are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in natural standing posture are associated with antisocial and manipulative personality traits. 自然站姿的差异与反社会和操纵型人格特质有关。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000515
Soren Wainio-Theberge, Jorge L Armony

In humans and animals, body posture is used in social and affective contexts to communicate social information, signal intentions, and prepare the individual for adaptive action. However, though stable individual differences in affect and social cognition are well studied, body posture continues to be typically studied in the context of state variation, and it remains unknown if trait-level differences in body posture exist and carry information about the individual. In our article, we show in a large sample (total N = 608 across five studies) that individual differences in body posture measured in a natural, baseline context are robustly associated with individual differences in personality. Through a series of studies, we characterize this relationship as reflecting individual differences in postural dominance and submission, which are associated with attitudes toward competition, power, and social hierarchy. We also validate our measure of natural posture by correlating it with physiological data from relevant musculature and showing its stability over a 1-month interval. Our work suggests that postural signaling of social rank occurs not just in brief displays in social contexts but exists as a stable individual trait with consequences for socioaffective processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在人类和动物中,身体姿势在社会和情感环境中被用来交流社会信息、表达意图以及为个体采取适应性行动做准备。然而,尽管人们对情感和社会认知中稳定的个体差异进行了深入研究,但对身体姿势的研究通常仍然是在状态变异的背景下进行的,人们仍然不知道身体姿势的特质水平差异是否存在并携带着关于个体的信息。在我们的文章中,我们通过一个大样本(五项研究的总样本数=608)表明,在自然、基线背景下测量的身体姿势的个体差异与人格的个体差异密切相关。通过一系列的研究,我们将这种关系描述为反映了个体在姿势支配和服从方面的差异,而这与对竞争、权力和社会等级制度的态度有关。我们还通过将自然姿势与相关肌肉组织的生理数据相关联,验证了我们的自然姿势测量方法,并显示了其在 1 个月间隔内的稳定性。我们的研究表明,社会等级的姿势信号不仅发生在社会背景下的短暂展示中,而且作为一种稳定的个体特质而存在,并对社会情感处理产生影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Differences in natural standing posture are associated with antisocial and manipulative personality traits.","authors":"Soren Wainio-Theberge, Jorge L Armony","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000515","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000515","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In humans and animals, body posture is used in social and affective contexts to communicate social information, signal intentions, and prepare the individual for adaptive action. However, though stable individual differences in affect and social cognition are well studied, body posture continues to be typically studied in the context of state variation, and it remains unknown if trait-level differences in body posture exist and carry information about the individual. In our article, we show in a large sample (total <i>N</i> = 608 across five studies) that individual differences in body posture measured in a natural, baseline context are robustly associated with individual differences in personality. Through a series of studies, we characterize this relationship as reflecting individual differences in postural dominance and submission, which are associated with attitudes toward competition, power, and social hierarchy. We also validate our measure of natural posture by correlating it with physiological data from relevant musculature and showing its stability over a 1-month interval. Our work suggests that postural signaling of social rank occurs not just in brief displays in social contexts but exists as a stable individual trait with consequences for socioaffective processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1089-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why we do what we do matters for how we feel: Links among autonomous goal regulation, need fulfillment, and well-being in daily life. 我们为什么要做我们所做的事,这关系到我们的感受:日常生活中自主目标调节、需求满足和幸福感之间的联系。
IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000522
Anne Sosin, Andreas B Neubauer

Reasons for pursuing self-set goals have been linked to well-being. The present article examines the link between autonomous goal regulation (the why of goal pursuit) and well-being, considering the role of the basic psychological needs, effort, and goal progress. Three studies were conducted using experience sampling methods in which German-speaking participants (Study 1: N = 207, Study 2: N = 717, Study 3: N = 703) completed 1-4 daily questionnaires over 21 consecutive days. Multilevel structural equation models were used to capture the structure of autonomous goal regulation and need fulfillment on the within-person (moment-to-moment/day-to-day), the between-goal, and the between-person levels. Additionally, the links among the degree of relative autonomous goal regulation, need fulfillment, and well-being were investigated on all three levels. Relative autonomous goal regulation was consistently linked to need fulfillment, which in turn was associated with well-being on the within-person level. On the between-goal and between-person levels, results differed slightly between the three studies but overall suggested similar results as on the within-person level. These findings highlight the central role of the why of goal pursuit for individual's daily well-being. Understanding the link between individual goals and well-being in everyday life may be an important step in helping individuals make better choices about their goals, which in turn could improve their overall well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

追求自我设定目标的原因与幸福感有关。本文探讨了自主目标调节(追求目标的原因)与幸福感之间的联系,并考虑了基本心理需求、努力和目标进展的作用。我们采用经验取样法进行了三项研究,德语参与者(研究 1:207 人;研究 2:717 人;研究 3:703 人)在连续 21 天内每天填写 1-4 份问卷。研究采用了多层次结构方程模型来捕捉自主目标调节和需求满足在人内(瞬间到瞬间/日常)、目标间和人与人之间的结构。此外,还在所有三个层面上研究了相对自主目标调节程度、需求满足和幸福感之间的联系。在人内层面上,相对自主的目标调控与需求满足始终相关,而需求满足又与幸福感相关。在目标间和人与人之间的层面上,三项研究的结果略有不同,但总体上与人内层面的结果相似。这些发现凸显了目标追求对于个人日常幸福感的核心作用。了解个人目标与日常生活幸福感之间的联系可能是帮助个人更好地选择目标的重要一步,这反过来又能提高他们的整体幸福感。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Why we do what we do matters for how we feel: Links among autonomous goal regulation, need fulfillment, and well-being in daily life.","authors":"Anne Sosin, Andreas B Neubauer","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000522","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000522","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reasons for pursuing self-set goals have been linked to well-being. The present article examines the link between autonomous goal regulation (the <i>why</i> of goal pursuit) and well-being, considering the role of the basic psychological needs, effort, and goal progress. Three studies were conducted using experience sampling methods in which German-speaking participants (Study 1: <i>N</i> = 207, Study 2: <i>N</i> = 717, Study 3: <i>N</i> = 703) completed 1-4 daily questionnaires over 21 consecutive days. Multilevel structural equation models were used to capture the structure of autonomous goal regulation and need fulfillment on the within-person (moment-to-moment/day-to-day), the between-goal, and the between-person levels. Additionally, the links among the degree of relative autonomous goal regulation, need fulfillment, and well-being were investigated on all three levels. Relative autonomous goal regulation was consistently linked to need fulfillment, which in turn was associated with well-being on the within-person level. On the between-goal and between-person levels, results differed slightly between the three studies but overall suggested similar results as on the within-person level. These findings highlight the central role of the <i>why</i> of goal pursuit for individual's daily well-being. Understanding the link between individual goals and well-being in everyday life may be an important step in helping individuals make better choices about their goals, which in turn could improve their overall well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141902074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of personality and social psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1