Ammonia injection location and ammonia-coal blending method significantly affect boiler combustion performance and pollutant emissions, yet their synergistic effects remain unclear. To investigate this synergistic effect, six cases of 20 % ammonia co-firing with coal were simulated in a 330 MW tangentially fired boiler, including pure coal and ammonia-coal co-injection through four-layer burners, as well as in-burner and in-boiler blending using burners at two different heights. The temperature distribution, coal burnout behaviors, and NOx generation characteristics were obtained. The results showed that the ammonia injection location and fuel blending method jointly influence the high-temperature distribution in the main combustion zone. With upper ammonia injection, the in-burner blending shifts the high-temperature zone to the upper of main combustion zone and its downstream regions, whereas in-boiler blending confines it to the bottom. However, bottom injection exhibits the opposite trend. These higher-temperature areas corresponded to increased concentrations of H2O and CO2, enhancing thermal radiation and heat transfer. Ammonia injection through either the upper or bottom burner using the in-boiler blending method increased the peak coal burnout rate and narrowed the half-peak width in the main combustion zone. However, compared with upper injection, bottom ammonia injection shifted the burnout peak toward the reduction zone, likely due to lower temperatures from pure ammonia combustion that hinder coal ignition. Although the NO concentrations were comparable between the two fuel blending methods regardless of injection location, the NO formation and reduction rates varied with combination of injection position and blending method. Specifically, with bottom ammonia injection, in-boiler blending yielded a higher NO reduction rate by NH3, while in-burner blending led to greater fuel-NO formation. For upper injection, however, the NO formation and reduction rates were similar between the two blending methods, likely due to comparable global equivalence ratios.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
