Journal of The Serbian Chemical Society最新文献

Objectives: This study sought to determine the confidence level of mental health practitioners in Oman regarding the use of antidepressants during pregnancy and breastfeeding, assess their knowledge and need for further training in this area, and examine their current prescribing patterns and preferences.

Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted from May to June 2017 among all practitioners in the psychiatry specialty, including medical officers authorized to prescribe medications, at the Behavioral Medicine Department of Sultan Qaboos University Hospital and Al Masarra Hospital.

Results: Forty-two practitioners (response rate = 89.4%) responded to the questionnaire. Of them, 10 (23.8%) had no experience, while 30 (71.4%) had experience in prescribing antidepressants during both pregnancy and breastfeeding periods. Twenty-seven (64.3%) respondents felt that they were confident in prescribing antidepressants for women during their perinatal period, while 30.0% were neutral. Moreover, 35 (83.3%) participants expressed the need for more training in this area. Furthermore, 34 (81.0%) believed that more training in perinatal psychiatry should be included in the psychiatry curriculum. There was no consistent prescribing pattern (either prescribing or avoiding) among our participating practitioners during the first trimester of pregnancy and breastfeeding periods. The drug of choice in the first trimester of pregnancy was fluoxetine preferred by approximately 85.0% of the practitioners, but avoided by 10.0% of practitioners in the same period. This was followed by amitriptyline (50.0% vs. 23.0%), sertraline (50.0% vs. 9.0%), imipramine (28.0% vs. 84.0%). During breastfeeding, the drug of choice for approximately 74.0% of the practitioners was paroxetine, but avoided by 15.0% of practitioners. This was followed by sertraline (50.0% vs. 8.0%). The most common reasons for prescription during pregnancy were safety, evidence-based practice, and low teratogenicity. For breastfeeding, the main reasons for prescription were low levels of the drug in breast milk, safety, and evidence-based practice. On the other hand, high teratogenicity, neonatal side effects, limited data, and lack of evidence were among the most common reasons behind avoiding prescribing during pregnancy, while high levels of breast milk, neonatal side effects, limited evidence, and safety concerns were the most common reasons during the breastfeeding period.

Conclusions: There was inconsistency among mental health practitioners in making prescription decisions and in their prescribing patterns.

Objectives: Peritoneal metastases (PM) and liver metastases (LM) are present simultaneously in up to 2 % of patients at the time of their colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. Curatively intended treatment includes cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with LM resection. A less invasive treatment for LM is ablation. We aimed to estimate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and postoperative data in patients managed simultaneously with CRS, HIPEC and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as first choice.

Methods: This was a retrospective national cohort study. All patients were treated at Aarhus University Hospital; the only CRS+HIPEC centre in Denmark. We included CRC patients managed with curative intent for simultaneously diagnosed PM and LM in the period January 2016 - December 2021. LM was treated with RFA as first choice, if possible. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 25 patients were included, the median age was 60 years (range 43-75 years) and 15 (60 %) were females. The median peritoneal cancer index was 7 (range 0-12), the median number of LM was 1 (range 1-3). Ablation was performed as the only treatment for LM in 18 (72 %) patients. After a median follow-up time of 17.1 months (range 4-36 months), the median OS was 28.6 months (95 % confidence interval (Cl) 15.8;36.1), 1-year OS was 84.0 % (95 % Cl 62.8;93.7). Median DFS was 6.1 months (95 % Cl 4.0;10.3). Median LOS was ten days (range 5-26 days). Both 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0 %.

Conclusions: The selected treatment modality (RFA) for CRC patients with both LM and PM was safe. However, DFS was low. Further research is warranted to investigate if RFA is as effective as LM resection.