首页 > 最新文献

Lung Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Long-term survival with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: updated follow-up analysis PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合铂基化疗与单独化疗在局部晚期或转移性肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌中的长期生存:最新的随访分析
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108855
Yanna Tang , Wei Du , Xuanye Zhang , Xuan Yang , Yixin Zhou , Sha Fu , Li Zhang , Shaodong Hong
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC), a rare Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype, exhibits distinct clinicopathological features but lacks evidence-based first-line therapy. Our previous study demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (IO-Chemo) versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). However, the long-term overall survival (OS) benefit remained uncertain. This study presents the final OS data with extended follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multicenter retrospective study, 133 patients with unresectable stage III–IV PLELC were stratified by first-line therapy: Chemo group (n = 78, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC)) and IO-Chemo group (n = 55, PBC plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors). The primary analysis in the study was OS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a median follow-up of 102.6 months (Chemo group) and 48.5 months (IO-Chemo group), IO-Chemo demonstrated improved OS (median not reached vs. 25.6 months; HR 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.30–0.77; <em>P</em> = 0.0023) and PFS (median 15.7 vs. 7.6 months; HR 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.30–0.67; <em>P</em> < 0.0001), compared with chemotherapy alone. Salvage immunotherapy after first-line PBC was associated with prolonged OS compared to no subsequent immunotherapy (median 70.0 vs. 23.6 months, <em>P</em> = 0.0077). Multivariate analysis confirmed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 (<em>P</em> < 0.001), first-line use of chemoimmunotherapy (<em>P</em> < 0.001) and low baseline EBV DNA levels (<em>P</em> = 0.019) as favorable prognostic factors, while liver metastasis (<em>P</em> < 0.001) and smoking (<em>P</em> = 0.011) were adverse ones.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>First-line immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is associated with long-term survival benefit in advanced PLELC. These findings support IO-Chemo as the preferred first-line regimen for this rare malignancy.</div><div>Abbreviations: PLELC, Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; mPFS, median PFS; IO-Chemo, immunotherapy plus chemotherapy; Chemo, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; mOS, median OS; PBC, platinum-based chemotherapy; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; EBER-ISH, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA in situ hybridization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TP, taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus platinum; GP, gemcitabine plus platinum; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; NR, not reached; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ORR, the objective response rate; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; AlK, anaplastic lymphoma
目的:肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌(PLELC)是一种罕见的Epstein-Barr病毒(EBV)相关的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)亚型,具有独特的临床病理特征,但缺乏循证一线治疗。我们之前的研究表明,一线免疫治疗加化疗(IO-Chemo)比单独化疗(Chemo)有更高的无进展生存期(PFS)。然而,长期总生存(OS)获益仍然不确定。本研究提供了延长随访的最终OS数据。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,133例不可切除的III-IV期PLELC患者被分层分为一线治疗:化疗组(n = 78,铂基化疗(PBC))和io化疗组(n = 55, PBC联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂)。本研究的主要分析是OS。结果:中位随访时间为102.6个月(化疗组)和48.5个月(IO-Chemo组),IO-Chemo改善了OS(中位未达到vs 25.6个月;HR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30-0.77; P = 0.0023)和PFS(中位15.7 vs 7.6个月;HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.30-0.67; P结论:一线免疫治疗联合铂基化疗与晚期PLELC的长期生存获益相关。这些发现支持io化疗作为治疗这种罕见恶性肿瘤的首选一线方案。缩写词:PLELC,肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌;EBV, eb病毒;NSCLC,非小细胞肺癌;PFS:无进展生存期;mPFS:中位PFS;IO-Chemo,免疫治疗加化疗;化疗,化疗;OS,总生存期;mOS,中位OS;PBC,铂基化疗;PD-1,程序性细胞死亡-1;PD-L1,程序性细胞死亡配体1;eb病毒编码小RNA原位杂交;实体肿瘤反应评价标准;紫杉烷(紫杉醇或多西紫杉醇)加铂;GP,吉西他滨加铂;ECOG PS,东部肿瘤合作集团业绩状况;NR,未达;HR:风险比;CI,置信区间;ORR:客观反应率;PR,部分反应;SD,病情稳定;PD,进行性疾病;CTLA-4,细胞毒性t淋巴细胞相关蛋白4;表皮生长因子受体;间变性淋巴瘤激酶;SCLC,小细胞肺癌;鼻咽癌,鼻咽癌;il - 6,白细胞介素- 6;TNF-α,肿瘤坏死因子;血管内皮生长因子;M-CSF,单核细胞集落刺激因子;ICI,免疫检查点抑制剂;TBP,治疗无进展。
{"title":"Long-term survival with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: updated follow-up analysis","authors":"Yanna Tang ,&nbsp;Wei Du ,&nbsp;Xuanye Zhang ,&nbsp;Xuan Yang ,&nbsp;Yixin Zhou ,&nbsp;Sha Fu ,&nbsp;Li Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaodong Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108855","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108855","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC), a rare Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype, exhibits distinct clinicopathological features but lacks evidence-based first-line therapy. Our previous study demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (IO-Chemo) versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). However, the long-term overall survival (OS) benefit remained uncertain. This study presents the final OS data with extended follow-up.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In this multicenter retrospective study, 133 patients with unresectable stage III–IV PLELC were stratified by first-line therapy: Chemo group (n = 78, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC)) and IO-Chemo group (n = 55, PBC plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors). The primary analysis in the study was OS.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;With a median follow-up of 102.6 months (Chemo group) and 48.5 months (IO-Chemo group), IO-Chemo demonstrated improved OS (median not reached vs. 25.6 months; HR 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.30–0.77; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.0023) and PFS (median 15.7 vs. 7.6 months; HR 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.30–0.67; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.0001), compared with chemotherapy alone. Salvage immunotherapy after first-line PBC was associated with prolonged OS compared to no subsequent immunotherapy (median 70.0 vs. 23.6 months, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.0077). Multivariate analysis confirmed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001), first-line use of chemoimmunotherapy (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001) and low baseline EBV DNA levels (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.019) as favorable prognostic factors, while liver metastasis (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001) and smoking (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.011) were adverse ones.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;First-line immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is associated with long-term survival benefit in advanced PLELC. These findings support IO-Chemo as the preferred first-line regimen for this rare malignancy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Abbreviations: PLELC, Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; mPFS, median PFS; IO-Chemo, immunotherapy plus chemotherapy; Chemo, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; mOS, median OS; PBC, platinum-based chemotherapy; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; EBER-ISH, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA in situ hybridization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TP, taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus platinum; GP, gemcitabine plus platinum; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; NR, not reached; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ORR, the objective response rate; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; AlK, anaplastic lymphoma ","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 108855"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145708553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of PD-L1 on first-line osimertinib outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: real-world data from the AURORA25 study and meta-analysis PD-L1对egfr突变型NSCLC一线奥西替尼结果的影响:来自AURORA25研究和荟萃分析的真实数据
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108854
Marliese Alexander , Malinda Itchins , Jonathan Felthun , Adnan Nagrial , Lauren J. Brown , Kenneth O’Byrne , Antony J. Mersiades , Brett G.M. Hughes , Lydia Warburton , Benjamin Y. Kong , Melissa Moore , Prunella Blinman , Samantha Bowyer , Timothy Clay , Tim Spelman , Nick Pavlakis , Benjamin J. Solomon , Steven Kao

Introduction

The prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line osimertinib remains uncertain. This study evaluated its association with survival in a real-world cohort, supported by meta-analysis.

Materials

Retrospective multicentre study using AURORA cohort (ACTRN12625000038493). Primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) comparing PD-L1 high (≥50 %) vs low (0–49 %). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), osimertinib duration and response, and analyses at ≥1 %/≥25 %/75 % cut-points. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were applied. Meta-analysis of studies to 18April2025 reporting first-line osimertinib outcomes by PD-L1 expression was performed.

Results

Among 216 patients from 15 centres, median rwPFS was 24.8 months (95 %CI 19.7–29.6). Higher PD-L1 (≥25 %, ≥50 %, ≥75 % versus below each threshold) was associated with shorter rwPFS. The adjusted HR for PD-L1 ≥50 % (n = 35/216, 16 %) vs 0–49 % (n = 181, 84 %) was 3.03 (95 %CI 1.85–4.96, p < 0.001). Median OS was 56.9 months (95 %CI 23.3–57.4): 40.4 with PD-L1 ≥50 and 57.0 with 0–49 %. PD-L1 correlated with shorter OS in unadjusted analyses, with ≥75 % remaining significant after adjustment (HR 2.09, 95 %CI 1.01–4.33, p = 0.046). Meta-analysis of six studies confirmed shorter rwPFS (HR 2.32, 95 %CI 1.16–4.64, p = 0.0178) and OS (HR 2.38, 95 %CI 1.16–4.86, p = 0.0176) for PD-L1 ≥50 % vs 0–49 %.

Conclusions

PD-L1 ≥50 % was associated with over twofold risk of progression or death in EGFR-mutant NSCLC on first-line osimertinib. Supported by meta-analysis, results suggest PD-L1 expression is a negative prognostic factor, and these patients may benefit from intensified first-line strategies with prospective evaluation.
在一线奥西替尼治疗的egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,PD-L1表达的预后意义尚不确定。本研究在一个真实世界队列中评估了其与生存率的关系,并得到meta分析的支持。资料:回顾性多中心研究,使用AURORA队列(ACTRN12625000038493)。主要终点是真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS),比较PD-L1高(≥50%)和低(0- 49%)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、奥西替尼持续时间和反应,以及≥1% /≥25% / 75%切割点的分析。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox模型。对截至2025年4月18日报道PD-L1表达的一线奥西替尼结果的研究进行meta分析。结果:来自15个中心的216例患者中,中位rwPFS为24.8个月(95% CI 19.7-29.6)。较高的PD-L1(≥25%,≥50%,≥75%,低于每个阈值)与较短的rwPFS相关。PD-L1≥50% (n = 35/ 216,16 %) vs 0- 49% (n = 181, 84 %)的校正风险比为3.03 (95% CI 1.85-4.96, p)。结论:在一线奥西替尼治疗的egfr突变型NSCLC中,PD-L1≥50%与超过两倍的进展或死亡风险相关。meta分析的结果表明,PD-L1表达是一个负面的预后因素,这些患者可能受益于强化的一线治疗策略和前瞻性评估。
{"title":"Impact of PD-L1 on first-line osimertinib outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: real-world data from the AURORA25 study and meta-analysis","authors":"Marliese Alexander ,&nbsp;Malinda Itchins ,&nbsp;Jonathan Felthun ,&nbsp;Adnan Nagrial ,&nbsp;Lauren J. Brown ,&nbsp;Kenneth O’Byrne ,&nbsp;Antony J. Mersiades ,&nbsp;Brett G.M. Hughes ,&nbsp;Lydia Warburton ,&nbsp;Benjamin Y. Kong ,&nbsp;Melissa Moore ,&nbsp;Prunella Blinman ,&nbsp;Samantha Bowyer ,&nbsp;Timothy Clay ,&nbsp;Tim Spelman ,&nbsp;Nick Pavlakis ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Solomon ,&nbsp;Steven Kao","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108854","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108854","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in <em>EGFR</em>-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line osimertinib remains uncertain. This study evaluated its association with survival in a real-world cohort, supported by meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><div>Retrospective multicentre study using AURORA cohort (ACTRN12625000038493). Primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) comparing PD-L1 high (≥50 %) vs low (0–49 %). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), osimertinib duration and response, and analyses at ≥1 %/≥25 %/75 % cut-points. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were applied. Meta-analysis of studies to 18April2025 reporting first-line osimertinib outcomes by PD-L1 expression was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 216 patients from 15 centres, median rwPFS was 24.8 months (95 %CI 19.7–29.6). Higher PD-L1 (≥25 %, ≥50 %, ≥75 % versus below each threshold) was associated with shorter rwPFS. The adjusted HR for PD-L1 ≥50 % (n = 35/216, 16 %) vs 0–49 % (n = 181, 84 %) was 3.03 (95 %CI 1.85–4.96, p &lt; 0.001). Median OS was 56.9 months (95 %CI 23.3–57.4): 40.4 with PD-L1 ≥50 and 57.0 with 0–49 %. PD-L1 correlated with shorter OS in unadjusted analyses, with ≥75 % remaining significant after adjustment (HR 2.09, 95 %CI 1.01–4.33, p = 0.046). Meta-analysis of six studies confirmed shorter rwPFS (HR 2.32, 95 %CI 1.16–4.64, p = 0.0178) and OS (HR 2.38, 95 %CI 1.16–4.86, p = 0.0176) for PD-L1 ≥50 % vs 0–49 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PD-L1 ≥50 % was associated with over twofold risk of progression or death in <em>EGFR</em>-mutant NSCLC on first-line osimertinib. Supported by meta-analysis, results suggest PD-L1 expression is a negative prognostic factor, and these patients may benefit from intensified first-line strategies with prospective evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 108854"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145724457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient and oncologist preferences for ALK+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments: a discrete choice experiment in the United States 患者和肿瘤学家对ALK+晚期非小细胞肺癌酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的偏好:美国的离散选择实验
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108850
Hannah Le , Josh Coulter , Ken Culver , Joseph C. Cappelleri , Nada Rifi , Hui Lu , Matthew Quaife , Keila Meginnis , Gabriela S. Fernandez , Shailja Vaghela , Brett Hauber , Thomas E. Stinchcombe

Purpose

Next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first-line (1L) treatments for ALK+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Treatments differ in systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy and adverse event (AE) profiles. There is a need for understanding treatment preferences of patients and oncologists in this setting.

Patients and methods

Patients receiving TKIs for ALK+ aNSCLC and oncologists were recruited from patient databases, patient advocacy groups and an online panel to complete a discrete choice experiment, which included progression-free survival (PFS), brain metastases (BM) development, BM progression, metabolic events, weight gain, CNS AEs, fatigue/asthenia, and muscle/bone pain. Responses were analyzed using a mixed logit model. Relative attribute importance (RAI), minimum acceptable benefit, and maximal acceptable risk were calculated.

Results

Of the 151 patients, 23.2 % had BM and 50.3 % were on 1L treatment. Treatment benefits outweighed AEs and contributed to 73.6 % of patients’ and 67.0 % of oncologists’ total RAI. Stopping BM progression was most important to patients (27.2 %), whereas PFS was most important to oncologists (31.1 %). Oncologists placed two and four times as much importance on avoiding CNS AEs and metabolic events, respectively, than patients. Patients placed more importance on avoiding fatigue/asthenia than oncologists.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this was the first study to quantify preferences regarding 1L treatments for ALK+ aNSCLC in the US. As patients and oncologists were shown to have different priorities, understanding the differing trade-offs between treatment benefits and AEs can facilitate shared decision-making and personalized 1L treatment for ALK+ aNSCLC.
新一代间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)靶向酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)是ALK+晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)的标准一线(1L)治疗方法。治疗方法在全身和中枢神经系统(CNS)疗效和不良事件(AE)方面有所不同。在这种情况下,有必要了解患者和肿瘤学家的治疗偏好。患者和方法从患者数据库、患者倡导团体和在线小组中招募接受tki治疗的ALK+ aNSCLC患者和肿瘤学家,完成一项离散选择实验,包括无进展生存期(PFS)、脑转移(BM)发展、BM进展、代谢事件、体重增加、中枢神经系统ae、疲劳/虚弱和肌肉/骨痛。使用混合logit模型分析响应。计算相对属性重要性(RAI)、最小可接受效益和最大可接受风险。结果151例患者中,23.2%为BM, 50.3%为1L治疗。治疗收益超过ae,占患者总RAI的73.6%,占肿瘤学家总RAI的67.0%。阻止BM进展对患者(27.2%)最重要,而PFS对肿瘤学家(31.1%)最重要。肿瘤学家对避免中枢神经系统不良事件和代谢事件的重视程度分别是患者的两倍和四倍。患者比肿瘤学家更重视避免疲劳/虚弱。据我们所知,这是美国首个量化ALK+ aNSCLC 1L治疗偏好的研究。由于患者和肿瘤学家有不同的优先级,了解治疗益处和ae之间的不同权衡可以促进ALK+ aNSCLC的共同决策和个性化1L治疗。
{"title":"Patient and oncologist preferences for ALK+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments: a discrete choice experiment in the United States","authors":"Hannah Le ,&nbsp;Josh Coulter ,&nbsp;Ken Culver ,&nbsp;Joseph C. Cappelleri ,&nbsp;Nada Rifi ,&nbsp;Hui Lu ,&nbsp;Matthew Quaife ,&nbsp;Keila Meginnis ,&nbsp;Gabriela S. Fernandez ,&nbsp;Shailja Vaghela ,&nbsp;Brett Hauber ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Stinchcombe","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108850","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108850","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first-line (1L) treatments for ALK+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Treatments differ in systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy and adverse event (AE) profiles. There is a need for understanding treatment preferences of patients and oncologists in this setting.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients receiving TKIs for ALK<em>+</em> aNSCLC and oncologists were recruited from patient databases, patient advocacy groups and an online panel to complete a discrete choice experiment, which included progression-free survival (PFS), brain metastases (BM) development, BM progression, metabolic events, weight gain, CNS AEs, fatigue/asthenia, and muscle/bone pain. Responses were analyzed using a mixed logit model. Relative attribute importance (RAI), minimum acceptable benefit, and maximal acceptable risk were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 151 patients, 23.2 % had BM and 50.3 % were on 1L treatment. Treatment benefits outweighed AEs and contributed to 73.6 % of patients’ and 67.0 % of oncologists’ total RAI. Stopping BM progression was most important to patients (27.2 %), whereas PFS was most important to oncologists (31.1 %). Oncologists placed two and four times as much importance on avoiding CNS AEs and metabolic events, respectively, than patients. Patients placed more importance on avoiding fatigue/asthenia than oncologists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To our knowledge, this was the first study to quantify preferences regarding 1L treatments for ALK+ aNSCLC in the US. As patients and oncologists were shown to have different priorities, understanding the differing trade-offs between treatment benefits and AEs can facilitate shared decision-making and personalized 1L treatment for ALK+ aNSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 108850"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Entrectinib in Asian patients with ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer: updated efficacy and safety analysis 恩替尼治疗ROS1融合阳性的亚洲非小细胞肺癌患者:最新的疗效和安全性分析
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108851
Shun Lu , Yun Fan , Xiaorong Dong , Yan Yu , Juan Li , Jun Zhao , Chia-Chi Lin , Pengcheng Zhang , Yanjun Shi , Rui Luo , Xichun Hu

Background

In an integrated analysis of phase I/II trials (STARTRK-2, STARTRK-1, ALKA-372–001), entrectinib induced responses in global populations with advanced ROS1-fusion positive (ROS1-fp) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study reports updated efficacy and safety data in Asian patients from the integrated analysis (cutoff: 16 July 2023).

Methods

Asian patients with ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve locally advanced/metastatic ROS1-fp NSCLC, with/without central nervous system (CNS) metastasis were included. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial (IC)-ORR, IC-DoR, and safety. An exploratory subgroup analysis of patients naïve to systemic therapy in the metastatic setting (1L) was also investigated.

Results

The efficacy-evaluable population included 99 patients. Median (range) age was 53 (20, 86) years; 32.3 % of patients had baseline CNS metastases. Confirmed ORR was 68.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 58.6 %–77.6 %); median DoR was 18.6 months (95 % CI 11.1–38.5). Confirmed IC-ORR was 34.8 % (95 % CI 16.4 %–57.3 %); median IC-DoR was 9.4 months (95 % CI 6.8–not evaluable). Median time to CNS progression was 28.9 months (95 % CI 15.7–41.4). In the 1L population (n = 40), confirmed ORR was 67.5 % (95 % CI 50.9 %–81.4 %); median DoR was 38.5 months (95 % CI 11.1–not evaluable). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were weight increased (45.9 %), constipation (40.4 %), and dysgeusia (39.4 %).

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates continued efficacy of entrectinib in Asian patients with advanced ROS1-fp NSCLC, both overall and in the 1L setting. No new safety signals emerged.
背景:在一项I/II期试验(STARTRK-2、STARTRK-1、ALKA-372-001)的综合分析中,肠替尼在全球晚期ros1融合阳性(ROS1-fp)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)人群中诱导了应答。本研究报告了来自综合分析的亚洲患者的最新疗效和安全性数据(截止日期:2023年7月16日)。方法:亚洲ROS1酪氨酸激酶inhibitor-naïve局部晚期/转移性ROS1-fp NSCLC患者,伴有/不伴有中枢神经系统(CNS)转移。主要终点是总缓解率(ORR)和缓解持续时间(DoR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、颅内(IC)-ORR、IC- dor和安全性。对转移性肿瘤(1L)患者naïve接受全身治疗的探索性亚组分析也进行了研究。结果:疗效评价人群包括99例患者。中位(范围)年龄为53岁(20,86)岁;32.3%的患者有基线中枢神经系统转移。确诊ORR为68.7%(95%可信区间[CI] 58.6% - 77.6%);中位DoR为18.6个月(95% CI 11.1-38.5)。确认IC-ORR为34.8%(95%可信区间16.4% - -57.3%);中位IC-DoR为9.4个月(95% CI 6.8-不可评估)。中枢神经系统进展的中位时间为28.9个月(95% CI 15.7-41.4)。在1L人群(n = 40)中,确诊ORR为67.5% (95% CI 50.9% - 81.4%);中位DoR为38.5个月(95% CI 11.1,不可评估)。最常见的治疗相关不良事件是体重增加(45.9%)、便秘(40.4%)和发音困难(39.4%)。结论:该分析证明了enterrectinib对亚洲晚期ROS1-fp NSCLC患者的持续疗效,无论是总体疗效还是1L疗效。没有出现新的安全信号。
{"title":"Entrectinib in Asian patients with ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer: updated efficacy and safety analysis","authors":"Shun Lu ,&nbsp;Yun Fan ,&nbsp;Xiaorong Dong ,&nbsp;Yan Yu ,&nbsp;Juan Li ,&nbsp;Jun Zhao ,&nbsp;Chia-Chi Lin ,&nbsp;Pengcheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanjun Shi ,&nbsp;Rui Luo ,&nbsp;Xichun Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108851","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108851","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In an integrated analysis of phase I/II trials (STARTRK-2, STARTRK-1, ALKA-372–001), entrectinib induced responses in global populations with advanced <em>ROS1</em>-fusion positive (<em>ROS1</em>-fp) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study reports updated efficacy and safety data in Asian patients from the integrated analysis (cutoff: 16 July 2023).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Asian patients with ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve locally advanced/metastatic <em>ROS1</em>-fp NSCLC, with/without central nervous system (CNS) metastasis were included. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial (IC)-ORR, IC-DoR, and safety. An exploratory subgroup analysis of patients naïve to systemic therapy in the metastatic setting (1L) was also investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The efficacy-evaluable population included 99 patients. Median (range) age was 53 (20, 86) years; 32.3 % of patients had baseline CNS metastases. Confirmed ORR was 68.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 58.6 %–77.6 %); median DoR was 18.6 months (95 % CI 11.1–38.5). Confirmed IC-ORR was 34.8 % (95 % CI 16.4 %–57.3 %); median IC-DoR was 9.4 months (95 % CI 6.8–not evaluable). Median time to CNS progression was 28.9 months (95 % CI 15.7–41.4). In the 1L population (n = 40), confirmed ORR was 67.5 % (95 % CI 50.9 %–81.4 %); median DoR was 38.5 months (95 % CI 11.1–not evaluable). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were weight increased (45.9 %), constipation (40.4 %), and dysgeusia (39.4 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This analysis demonstrates continued efficacy of entrectinib in Asian patients with advanced <em>ROS1</em>-fp NSCLC, both overall and in the 1L setting. No new safety signals emerged.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 108851"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145668976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
KRASG12D/G13D-USP15 axis promotes TGF-β/SMAD signaling and glycolytic flux to accelerate NSCLC pathogenesis KRASG12D/G13D-USP15轴促进TGF-β/SMAD信号和糖酵解通量加速NSCLC发病
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108848
Ikhlas A. Sindi , Abdelghafar M. Abu-Elsaoud , Amany I. Almars , Nahlah M. Ghouth , Sameerah Shaheen , Ahmed M. Basri , Zaki H Hakami , Tawfiq N. Jurayb , Abdullah A. Alqasem , Iman S. Abumansour , Hind M. Naffadi , Nasser A. Elhawary , Hassan Rudayni , Mohammed Al-zharani , Lina M. Alneghery , Mohamed M.I. Ghoneim

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with activating KRAS mutations representing a key oncogenic driver. These mutations profoundly reprogram cellular metabolism, especially glycolysis, thereby sustaining uncontrolled tumor proliferation. We identified ubiquitin-specific peptidase 15 (USP15) as a pivotal regulator in KRAS-driven metabolic remodeling and tumor progression. This study aims to elucidate the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of USP15 in KRASG12D/G13D-mutant NSCLC.

Methods

Comprehensive bioinformatics analyses were performed to identify key metabolic genes significantly associated with NSCLC prognosis. The expression of USP15 was examined in KRAS-mutant NSCLC tissues and cell lines. Functional assays, including CCK-8, EdU incorporation, wound-healing, and subcutaneous xenograft tumor models, were employed to evaluate the oncogenic role of USP15 in vitro and in vivo. In addition, qPCR, Western blotting, ELISA, immunofluorescence, and Seahorse metabolic flux assays were integrated with transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling to comprehensively delineate the mechanisms by which USP15 regulates tumor metabolism and growth in KRASG12D/G13D-mutant NSCLC.

Results

USP15 expression was elevated in KRAS-mutant NSCLC and was transcriptionally regulated by the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Silencing USP15 significantly inhibited NSCLC cell proliferation, migration, and tumorigenicity, while inducing apoptosis and enhancing chemosensitivity. Multi-omics analyses revealed that USP15 exerts its oncogenic function primarily through modulation of the TGF-β/SMAD signaling axis. Mechanistically, USP15 stabilized SMAD4 by deubiquitination and promoted the phosphorylation of SMAD2/3, thereby sustaining TGF-β/SMAD pathway activation. Moreover, USP15 enhanced glycolytic flux, evidenced by increased extracellular acidification rates and upregulated glycolytic genes expression, ultimately facilitating metabolic adaptation and tumor progression in KRASG12D/G13D-mutant NSCLC.

Conclusion

USP15 acts as a critical mediator of oncogenic KRAS-driven metabolic reprogramming in NSCLC by promoting glycolysis via the TGF-β/SMAD signaling cascade. These findings uncover a previously unrecognized role of USP15 in linking metabolic regulation to tumorigenic signaling in KRAS-mutant NSCLC and suggest that targeting USP15 may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for this aggressive cancer subtype.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一,激活KRAS突变是一个关键的致癌驱动因素。这些突变深刻地重编程细胞代谢,特别是糖酵解,从而维持不受控制的肿瘤增殖。我们发现泛素特异性肽酶15 (USP15)是kras驱动的代谢重塑和肿瘤进展的关键调节因子。本研究旨在阐明USP15在KRASG12D/ g13d突变型非小细胞肺癌中的生物学功能和分子机制。方法通过综合生物信息学分析,鉴定与非小细胞肺癌预后相关的关键代谢基因。在kras突变的NSCLC组织和细胞系中检测USP15的表达。通过CCK-8、EdU掺入、伤口愈合和皮下异种移植肿瘤模型等功能分析,评估USP15在体外和体内的致瘤作用。此外,将qPCR、Western blotting、ELISA、免疫荧光和海马代谢通量分析与转录组学和代谢组学分析相结合,全面描述USP15调节KRASG12D/ g13d突变型NSCLC肿瘤代谢和生长的机制。结果在kras突变型NSCLC中,sus15表达升高,并受MEK/ERK信号通路的转录调控。沉默USP15可显著抑制NSCLC细胞的增殖、迁移和致瘤性,同时诱导细胞凋亡并增强化疗敏感性。多组学分析显示,USP15主要通过调节TGF-β/SMAD信号轴发挥其致癌功能。机制上,USP15通过去泛素化作用稳定SMAD4,促进SMAD2/3的磷酸化,从而维持TGF-β/SMAD通路的激活。此外,USP15增强了糖酵解通量,细胞外酸化率增加,糖酵解基因表达上调,最终促进了KRASG12D/ g13d突变型NSCLC的代谢适应和肿瘤进展。结论usp15通过TGF-β/SMAD信号级联促进糖酵解,是NSCLC中kras驱动的致癌代谢重编程的关键介质。这些发现揭示了以前未被认识到的USP15在kras突变型非小细胞肺癌中代谢调节与致瘤信号传导的联系中的作用,并表明靶向USP15可能代表了这种侵袭性癌症亚型的有希望的治疗策略。
{"title":"KRASG12D/G13D-USP15 axis promotes TGF-β/SMAD signaling and glycolytic flux to accelerate NSCLC pathogenesis","authors":"Ikhlas A. Sindi ,&nbsp;Abdelghafar M. Abu-Elsaoud ,&nbsp;Amany I. Almars ,&nbsp;Nahlah M. Ghouth ,&nbsp;Sameerah Shaheen ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Basri ,&nbsp;Zaki H Hakami ,&nbsp;Tawfiq N. Jurayb ,&nbsp;Abdullah A. Alqasem ,&nbsp;Iman S. Abumansour ,&nbsp;Hind M. Naffadi ,&nbsp;Nasser A. Elhawary ,&nbsp;Hassan Rudayni ,&nbsp;Mohammed Al-zharani ,&nbsp;Lina M. Alneghery ,&nbsp;Mohamed M.I. Ghoneim","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108848","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108848","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with activating <em>KRAS</em> mutations representing a key oncogenic driver. These mutations profoundly reprogram cellular metabolism, especially glycolysis, thereby sustaining uncontrolled tumor proliferation. We identified ubiquitin-specific peptidase 15 (USP15) as a pivotal regulator in KRAS-driven metabolic remodeling and tumor progression. This study aims to elucidate the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of USP15 in <em>KRAS<sup>G12D</sup></em><sup>/G13D</sup>-mutant NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Comprehensive bioinformatics analyses were performed to identify key metabolic genes significantly associated with NSCLC prognosis. The expression of USP15 was examined in <em>KRAS</em>-mutant NSCLC tissues and cell lines. Functional assays, including CCK-8, EdU incorporation, wound-healing, and subcutaneous xenograft tumor models, were employed to evaluate the oncogenic role of USP15 <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em>. In addition, qPCR, Western blotting, ELISA, immunofluorescence, and Seahorse metabolic flux assays were integrated with transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling to comprehensively delineate the mechanisms by which USP15 regulates tumor metabolism and growth in <em>KRAS<sup>G12D</sup></em><sup>/G13D</sup>-mutant NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>USP15</em> expression was elevated in <em>KRAS</em>-mutant NSCLC and was transcriptionally regulated by the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Silencing <em>USP15</em> significantly inhibited NSCLC cell proliferation, migration, and tumorigenicity, while inducing apoptosis and enhancing chemosensitivity. Multi-omics analyses revealed that USP15 exerts its oncogenic function primarily through modulation of the TGF-β/SMAD signaling axis. Mechanistically, USP15 stabilized SMAD4 by deubiquitination and promoted the phosphorylation of SMAD2/3, thereby sustaining TGF-β/SMAD pathway activation. Moreover, USP15 enhanced glycolytic flux, evidenced by increased extracellular acidification rates and upregulated glycolytic genes expression, ultimately facilitating metabolic adaptation and tumor progression in <em>KRAS<sup>G12D</sup></em><sup>/G13D</sup>-mutant NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>USP15 acts as a critical mediator of oncogenic KRAS-driven metabolic reprogramming in NSCLC by promoting glycolysis via the TGF-β/SMAD signaling cascade. These findings uncover a previously unrecognized role of USP15 in linking metabolic regulation to tumorigenic signaling in <em>KRAS</em>-mutant NSCLC and suggest that targeting USP15 may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for this aggressive cancer subtype.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 108848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First-line treatment in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: brief report of an individual patient data comparison of phase 3 clinical trials egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗:3期临床试验单个患者数据比较的简要报告
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108845
Andrea Torchia , Arianna Sabatini , Elisabetta Bengala , Mattia Alberto Di Civita , Fabio Ciurluini , Daniele Marinelli , Maristella Giammaruco , Anastasia Laudisi , Alain Gelibter , Gabriele Minuti , Lorenza Landi , Daniele Santini , Federico Cappuzzo

Introduction

Clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of novel first-line treatment strategies for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), relative to osimertinib monotherapy.

Methods

After review of the literature, we performed an individual patient data comparison of efficacy and safety of investigational regimens from phase 3 randomized controlled trials in untreated EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Results

Two studies were included in the analysis: FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA, evaluating the osimertinib-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib combinations, respectively. In progression free survival (PFS), there was a statistically significant difference favoring the FLAURA2 in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.79], not confirmed in the overall survival (OS) analysis where we did not find any significant difference. FLAURA2 PFS was longer in patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (HR 0.63), without liver metastases (HR 0.73), and with EGFR L858R (HR 0.68). In intracranial PFS (icPFS), there was a statistically significant difference favoring the FLAURA2 (HR 0.52). We found no differences in PFS in patients without CNS metastases, and with exon 19 deletions. No new safety signals resulted from the safety analysis. In FLAURA2, anemia, diarrhea, and neutropenia were more frequent, while in MARIPOSA rash and paronychia.

Conclusion

In the ITT population, we found no differences in OS between amivantamab-lazertinib and osimertinib-chemotherapy, despite a slightly higher PFS of the latter. Osimertinib-chemotherapy could be more effective in patients with CNS metastases, without liver metastases, and EGFR L858R mutation, however we could not compare OS in these subgroups. Due to the indirect nature of the comparison and the limitation of the methods our results are not definitive, but rather hypothesis-generating. Other factors must be considered in the choice of the treatment, including patient’s characteristics, the safety profile of the combinations, and center’s facilities and expertise.
临床试验评估了相对于奥西替尼单药治疗晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的新型一线治疗策略的有效性和安全性。方法:在回顾文献后,我们对未经治疗的egfr突变NSCLC的3期随机对照试验的研究方案的有效性和安全性进行了个体患者数据比较。结果FLAURA2和MARIPOSA两项研究被纳入分析,分别评估了奥西替尼和阿米万他马-拉泽替尼联合化疗。在无进展生存期(PFS)中,FLAURA2在意向治疗(ITT)人群中有统计学上显著的差异[危险比(HR) 0.79],在总生存期(OS)分析中没有得到证实,我们没有发现任何显著差异。flura2 PFS在中枢神经系统(CNS)转移患者(HR 0.63)、无肝转移患者(HR 0.73)和EGFR为L858R的患者(HR 0.68)中较长。在颅内PFS (icPFS)中,FLAURA2有统计学上的显著差异(HR 0.52)。我们发现没有中枢神经系统转移和外显子19缺失的患者的PFS没有差异。安全分析没有产生新的安全信号。在FLAURA2中,贫血、腹泻和中性粒细胞减少更常见,而在MARIPOSA中,皮疹和甲沟炎更常见。结论在ITT人群中,我们发现阿米万他马-拉泽替尼和奥西替尼化疗的OS没有差异,尽管后者的PFS略高。对于中枢神经系统转移、无肝转移和EGFR L858R突变的患者,奥西替尼化疗可能更有效,但我们无法比较这些亚组的OS。由于比较的间接性质和方法的局限性,我们的结果不是确定的,而是假设生成的。在选择治疗方案时必须考虑其他因素,包括患者的特点、联合用药的安全性以及中心的设施和专业知识。
{"title":"First-line treatment in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: brief report of an individual patient data comparison of phase 3 clinical trials","authors":"Andrea Torchia ,&nbsp;Arianna Sabatini ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Bengala ,&nbsp;Mattia Alberto Di Civita ,&nbsp;Fabio Ciurluini ,&nbsp;Daniele Marinelli ,&nbsp;Maristella Giammaruco ,&nbsp;Anastasia Laudisi ,&nbsp;Alain Gelibter ,&nbsp;Gabriele Minuti ,&nbsp;Lorenza Landi ,&nbsp;Daniele Santini ,&nbsp;Federico Cappuzzo","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108845","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108845","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of novel first-line treatment strategies for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (<em>EGFR</em>)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), relative to osimertinib monotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After review of the literature, we performed an individual patient data comparison of efficacy and safety of investigational regimens from phase 3 randomized controlled trials in untreated <em>EGFR</em>-mutated NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two studies were included in the analysis: FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA, evaluating the osimertinib-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib combinations, respectively. In progression free survival (PFS), there was a statistically significant difference favoring the FLAURA2 in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.79], not confirmed in the overall survival (OS) analysis where we did not find any significant difference. FLAURA2 PFS was longer in patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (HR 0.63), without liver metastases (HR 0.73), and with <em>EGFR</em> L858R (HR 0.68). In intracranial PFS (icPFS), there was a statistically significant difference favoring the FLAURA2 (HR 0.52). We found no differences in PFS in patients without CNS metastases, and with exon 19 deletions. No new safety signals resulted from the safety analysis. In FLAURA2, anemia, diarrhea, and neutropenia were more frequent, while in MARIPOSA rash and paronychia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the ITT population, we found no differences in OS between amivantamab-lazertinib and osimertinib-chemotherapy, despite a slightly higher PFS of the latter. Osimertinib-chemotherapy could be more effective in patients with CNS metastases, without liver metastases, and <em>EGFR</em> L858R mutation, however we could not compare OS in these subgroups. Due to the indirect nature of the comparison and the limitation of the methods our results are not definitive, but rather hypothesis-generating. Other factors must be considered in the choice of the treatment, including patient’s characteristics, the safety profile of the combinations, and center’s facilities and expertise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 108845"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145569612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term outcomes of Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy or Chemo-immunotherapy: A propensity score adjusted cohort study 广泛期小细胞肺癌化疗或化疗免疫治疗的长期预后:一项倾向评分调整队列研究
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108847
Heya Batah , Emily C. Zabor , Bridget Adcock , Monica Lee , Preeyal Patel , Meera Patel , Hadil Zureigat , Ahmed Nabil Mohamed , Daniel Paul Nurse , Yohanna B. Bedelu , Jacqulyn Tomer , Lukas Delasos , Khaled A. Hassan , Nathan A. Pennell , Marc A. Shapiro , James Stevenson , Alex A. Adjei , Moaath Khader Mustafa Ali

Background

Combining atezolizumab with carboplatin plus etoposide (Carbo-E) improved overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, there is a paucity of real-world outcomes. We present the largest and longest follow-up retrospective study evaluating treatment outcomes in ES-SCLC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare response rate, OS, and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ES-SCLC who received Carbo-E, Carbo-E and atezolizumab (Carbo-E-Atezo), and cisplatin and etoposide (Cis-E). We included all adult patients (≥ 18 years) treated at Cleveland Clinic between 1/2010–12/2022. Propensity score (PS) weighting and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for confounders.

Results

Among 602 ES-SCLC patients, 375 (62 %) received Carbo-E, 160 (27 %) received Carbo-E-Atezo, and 67 (11 %) received Cis-E. The median age was 67, 65, and 59 years, respectively. The median follow-up among survivors was 23.9 months (IQR: 13.3–––57.3). Five-year unadjusted OS was 4.5 % (Carbo-E), 7 % (Carbo-E-Atezo), and 5.2 % (Cis-E). Carbo-E-Atezo was associated with a longer PS-adjusted median OS than Carbo-E (9.1 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.039), but no difference was seen in PFS (5.5 vs. 5.5, P = 0.09) or response rate (P > 0.9). Compared to Carbo-E, Cis-E showed higher response rates (OR: 1.67, P = 0.03) but no improvement in OS (11 vs 8.3 months, P = 0.067) or PFS (7.7 vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.058). Cis-E did not differ significantly from Carbo-E-Atezo in response rate, OS, or PFS.

Conclusion

Long-term outcomes in ES-SCLC remain poor. Atezolizumab added to Carbo-E modestly improved OS but not PFS. Cisplatin-based regimens increased response rates but did not improve survival.
背景:atezolizumab联合卡铂+依托泊苷(carbop - e)可改善广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的总生存期(OS)。然而,现实世界的结果却很少。我们提出了最大和最长的随访回顾性研究,评估ES-SCLC的治疗结果。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了接受carboe、carboe和atezolizumab (carboe - atezo)以及顺铂和依托泊苷(Cis-E)治疗的ES-SCLC患者的缓解率、OS和无进展生存期(PFS)。我们纳入了2010年1月至2022年12月期间在克利夫兰诊所接受治疗的所有成年患者(≥18岁)。倾向评分(PS)加权和多变量Cox比例风险回归校正混杂因素。结果:602例ES-SCLC患者中,375例(62%)接受了carboc - e, 160例(27%)接受了carboc - e - atezo, 67例(11%)接受了Cis-E。中位年龄分别为67岁、65岁和59岁。幸存者的中位随访时间为23.9个月(IQR: 13.3—57.3)。5年未调整OS分别为4.5% (carboe)、7% (carboe - atezo)和5.2% (Cis-E)。carboe - atezo与carboe相比,经ps调整后的中位生存期更长(9.1个月对8.2个月,P = 0.039),但在PFS(5.5个月对5.5个月,P = 0.09)或缓解率(P = 0.9)方面没有差异。与carboe相比,Cis-E的有效率更高(OR: 1.67, P = 0.03),但在OS(11个月vs 8.3个月,P = 0.067)或PFS(7.7个月vs 5.5个月,P = 0.058)方面没有改善。Cis-E与carboe - atezo在反应率、OS或PFS方面无显著差异。结论:ES-SCLC的长期预后仍然很差。在carboe中加入Atezolizumab可适度改善OS,但不能改善PFS。以顺铂为基础的方案增加了缓解率,但没有改善生存。
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy or Chemo-immunotherapy: A propensity score adjusted cohort study","authors":"Heya Batah ,&nbsp;Emily C. Zabor ,&nbsp;Bridget Adcock ,&nbsp;Monica Lee ,&nbsp;Preeyal Patel ,&nbsp;Meera Patel ,&nbsp;Hadil Zureigat ,&nbsp;Ahmed Nabil Mohamed ,&nbsp;Daniel Paul Nurse ,&nbsp;Yohanna B. Bedelu ,&nbsp;Jacqulyn Tomer ,&nbsp;Lukas Delasos ,&nbsp;Khaled A. Hassan ,&nbsp;Nathan A. Pennell ,&nbsp;Marc A. Shapiro ,&nbsp;James Stevenson ,&nbsp;Alex A. Adjei ,&nbsp;Moaath Khader Mustafa Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108847","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108847","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Combining atezolizumab with carboplatin plus etoposide (Carbo-E) improved overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, there is a paucity of real-world outcomes. We present the largest and longest follow-up retrospective study evaluating treatment outcomes in ES-SCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare response rate, OS, and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ES-SCLC who received Carbo-E, Carbo-E and atezolizumab (Carbo-E-Atezo), and cisplatin and etoposide (Cis-E). We included all adult patients (≥ 18 years) treated at Cleveland Clinic between 1/2010–12/2022. Propensity score (PS) weighting and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 602 ES-SCLC patients, 375 (62 %) received Carbo-E, 160 (27 %) received Carbo-E-Atezo, and 67 (11 %) received Cis-E. The median age was 67, 65, and 59 years, respectively. The median follow-up among survivors was 23.9 months (IQR: 13.3–––57.3). Five-year unadjusted OS was 4.5 % (Carbo-E), 7 % (Carbo-E-Atezo), and 5.2 % (Cis-E). Carbo-E-Atezo was associated with a longer PS-adjusted median OS than Carbo-E (9.1 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.039), but no difference was seen in PFS (5.5 vs. 5.5, P = 0.09) or response rate (P &gt; 0.9). Compared to Carbo-E, Cis-E showed higher response rates (OR: 1.67, P = 0.03) but no improvement in OS (11 vs 8.3 months, P = 0.067) or PFS (7.7 vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.058). Cis-E did not differ significantly from Carbo-E-Atezo in response rate, OS, or PFS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Long-term outcomes in ES-SCLC remain poor. Atezolizumab added to Carbo-E modestly improved OS but not PFS. Cisplatin-based regimens increased response rates but did not improve survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 108847"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145564323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reappraising preoperative ctDNA in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: from detection to responsible clinical integration 重新评估egfr突变型NSCLC的术前ctDNA:从检测到负责任的临床整合
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108846
Man Sun , Dan Zang , Jun Chen
{"title":"Reappraising preoperative ctDNA in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: from detection to responsible clinical integration","authors":"Man Sun ,&nbsp;Dan Zang ,&nbsp;Jun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108846","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108846","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 108846"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145569680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tarlatamab population survival kinetics in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: brief report 塔拉他单抗在大分期小细胞肺癌中的群体生存动力学:简要报告。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108844
David J. Stewart , Bingnan Zhang , Razelle Kurzrock

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). ES-SCLC PFS curve exponential decay nonlinear regression analyses (EDNLRAs) suggests that only 10% of patients benefit. Here we report ES-SCLC EDNLRAs for the bispecific T-cell engager tarlatamab.

Experimental design

We digitized tarlatamab ES-SCLC PFS and OS curves from published studies and performed EDNLRAs of curve data.

Results

All four PFS curves fit 2-phase decay models, suggesting the presence of two distinct subpopulations- one with a short PFS half-life (median 3.2 months, similar to the tarlatamab DeLLphi-304 study chemotherapy arm) and the other with a very long PFS half-life). EDNLRAs indicated that 88 % of the patients belonged to the rapidly progressing subpopulation. The proportion of patients in the subpopulation with long PFS was lower than the study response rates. However, log-linear plots of response-duration curves also suggested 2-phase decay, with one subpopulation having very long responses and the other having very short responses. Two of four OS curves assessed fit 2-phase decay models. Longer follow-up will be required to assess the other two curves. For curves fitting 2-phase decay models, OS half-life for the subpopulation with shorter OS was modestly longer than the OS for the Dellphi-304 chemotherapy arm.

Conclusions

In ES-SCLC, EDNLRA of tarlatamab PFS curves and log-linear plots of response duration curves suggest two distinct subpopulations- one deriving marked benefit from tarlatamab and the other deriving much less benefit. Individual patient data might provide insight into underlying driving factors.
目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)延长广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。ES-SCLC PFS曲线指数衰减非线性回归分析(EDNLRAs)显示,只有10%的患者受益。在这里,我们报告ES-SCLC的EDNLRAs用于双特异性t细胞参与者tarlatamab。实验设计:我们将已发表研究中的tarlatamab ES-SCLC PFS和OS曲线数字化,并对曲线数据进行EDNLRAs。结果:所有4条PFS曲线都符合2期衰减模型,表明存在两个不同的亚群-一个具有较短的PFS半衰期(中位数为3.2个月,与tarlatamab delphi -304研究化疗组相似),另一个具有很长的PFS半衰期。EDNLRAs显示88%的患者属于快速进展的亚群。长PFS亚群中患者的比例低于研究反应率。然而,响应时间曲线的对数线性图也显示了两阶段的衰减,一个亚群的响应时间很长,另一个亚群的响应时间很短。评估的四条OS曲线中有两条符合两相衰减模型。对另外两条曲线的评估需要更长的随访时间。对于拟合两相衰变模型的曲线,具有较短OS的亚群的OS半衰期略长于delphi -304化疗组的OS。结论:在ES-SCLC中,塔拉他单抗PFS曲线的EDNLRA和反应持续时间曲线的对数线性图表明两个不同的亚群-一个从塔拉他单抗中获得显著的益处,另一个从塔拉他单抗中获得较少的益处。个别患者的数据可能会让我们深入了解潜在的驱动因素。
{"title":"Tarlatamab population survival kinetics in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: brief report","authors":"David J. Stewart ,&nbsp;Bingnan Zhang ,&nbsp;Razelle Kurzrock","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108844","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108844","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). ES-SCLC PFS curve exponential decay nonlinear regression analyses (EDNLRAs) suggests that only 10% of patients benefit. Here we report ES-SCLC EDNLRAs for the bispecific T-cell engager tarlatamab.</div></div><div><h3>Experimental design</h3><div>We digitized tarlatamab ES-SCLC PFS and OS curves from published studies and performed EDNLRAs of curve data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All four PFS curves fit 2-phase decay models, suggesting the presence of two distinct subpopulations- one with a short PFS half-life (median 3.2 months, similar to the tarlatamab DeLLphi-304 study chemotherapy arm) and the other with a very long PFS half-life). EDNLRAs indicated that 88 % of the patients belonged to the rapidly progressing subpopulation. The proportion of patients in the subpopulation with long PFS was lower than the study response rates. However, log-linear plots of response-duration curves also suggested 2-phase decay, with one subpopulation having very long responses and the other having very short responses. Two of four OS curves assessed fit 2-phase decay models. Longer follow-up will be required to assess the other two curves. For curves fitting 2-phase decay models, OS half-life for the subpopulation with shorter OS was modestly longer than the OS for the Dellphi-304 chemotherapy arm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In ES-SCLC, EDNLRA of tarlatamab PFS curves and log-linear plots of response duration curves suggest two distinct subpopulations- one deriving marked benefit from tarlatamab and the other deriving much less benefit. Individual patient data might provide insight into underlying driving factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 108844"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145557126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and molecular landscape of NRG1 fusions in Japanese solid tumors: a nationwide data analysis using the C-CAT database NRG1融合在日本实体瘤中的患病率和分子景观:使用C-CAT数据库的全国数据分析
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108843
Masaki Ishida , Tadaaki Yamada , Ryo Tsunashima , Midori Morita , Nobutaka Kataoka , Yusuke Kunimatsu , Ryo Sawada , Tae Hata , Hayato Kawachi , Masahiro Iwasaku , Yasuto Naoi , Koichi Takayama

Introduction

Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene fusions are critical oncogenic drivers that activate the ERBB signaling pathway across various solid tumors. Although targeted therapies for NRG1 fusion-positive cancers are advancing rapidly in clinical settings, their epidemiological and clinicogenomic characteristics remain poorly understood, warranting large-scale investigations.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced solid tumors who were registered in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database of Japan between June 2019 and February 2025. Our evaluation focused on the prevalence of NRG1 fusions, identities of fusion partners, co-occurring genomic alterations, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability status, and relevant clinical characteristics.

Results

Our study included 95,149 patients with advanced solid tumors who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling. Among them, 29 (0.03 %) harbored NRG1 fusions, most frequently in lung cancer (17 of 5,670 cases, 0.30 %). CD74 emerged as the predominant fusion partner, constituting 82.4 % of lung cancers, whereas other solid tumors exhibited a more diverse range of partners. Co-occurring genomic alterations were detected in 20 of 29 patients (69.0 %), with the most frequent alterations found in CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP. Additionally, pathological examination revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma in 17.6 % of lung cancers associated with NRG1 fusions.

Conclusion

This study confirms that NRG1 fusions are rare but significantly associated with lung cancer and the CD74 fusion partner. Our nationwide analysis represents the most comprehensive assessment of NRG1 fusions in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.
神经调节蛋白1 (NRG1)基因融合是激活多种实体肿瘤中ERBB信号通路的关键致癌驱动因素。尽管针对NRG1融合阳性癌症的靶向治疗在临床环境中进展迅速,但其流行病学和临床基因组学特征仍然知之甚少,因此需要进行大规模的研究。方法:我们对2019年6月至2025年2月期间在日本癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心数据库中注册的晚期实体瘤患者进行了回顾性分析。我们的评估侧重于NRG1融合的流行程度、融合伙伴的身份、共同发生的基因组改变、肿瘤突变负担、微卫星不稳定状态和相关临床特征。结果:我们的研究纳入了95149例晚期实体瘤患者,他们接受了全面的基因组分析。其中29例(0.03%)存在NRG1融合,最常见于肺癌(5670例中有17例,0.30%)。CD74是主要的融合伙伴,占肺癌的82.4%,而其他实体肿瘤表现出更多样化的融合伙伴。29例患者中有20例(69.0%)检测到共同发生的基因组改变,其中CDKN2A、CDKN2B和MTAP最为常见。此外,病理检查显示17.6%的肺癌与NRG1融合相关的粘液腺癌。结论:本研究证实NRG1融合是罕见的,但与肺癌和CD74融合伙伴有显著相关性。我们的全国分析代表了日本晚期实体瘤患者NRG1融合的最全面评估。
{"title":"Prevalence and molecular landscape of NRG1 fusions in Japanese solid tumors: a nationwide data analysis using the C-CAT database","authors":"Masaki Ishida ,&nbsp;Tadaaki Yamada ,&nbsp;Ryo Tsunashima ,&nbsp;Midori Morita ,&nbsp;Nobutaka Kataoka ,&nbsp;Yusuke Kunimatsu ,&nbsp;Ryo Sawada ,&nbsp;Tae Hata ,&nbsp;Hayato Kawachi ,&nbsp;Masahiro Iwasaku ,&nbsp;Yasuto Naoi ,&nbsp;Koichi Takayama","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108843","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108843","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Neuregulin 1 (<em>NRG1</em>) gene fusions are critical oncogenic drivers that activate the ERBB signaling pathway across various solid tumors. Although targeted therapies for <em>NRG1</em> fusion-positive cancers are advancing rapidly in clinical settings, their epidemiological and clinicogenomic characteristics remain poorly understood, warranting large-scale investigations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced solid tumors who were registered in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database of Japan between June 2019 and February 2025. Our evaluation focused on the prevalence of <em>NRG1</em> fusions, identities of fusion partners, co-occurring genomic alterations, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability status, and relevant clinical characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study included 95,149 patients with advanced solid tumors who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling. Among them, 29 (0.03 %) harbored <em>NRG1</em> fusions, most frequently in lung cancer (17 of 5,670 cases, 0.30 %). CD74 emerged as the predominant fusion partner, constituting 82.4 % of lung cancers, whereas other solid tumors exhibited a more diverse range of partners. Co-occurring genomic alterations were detected in 20 of 29 patients (69.0 %), with the most frequent alterations found in <em>CDKN2A</em>, <em>CDKN2B</em>, and <em>MTAP</em>. Additionally, pathological examination revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma in 17.6 % of lung cancers associated with <em>NRG1</em> fusions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study confirms that <em>NRG1</em> fusions are rare but significantly associated with lung cancer and the CD74 fusion partner. Our nationwide analysis represents the most comprehensive assessment of <em>NRG1</em> fusions in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 108843"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lung Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1