首页 > 最新文献

Sociological Methods & Research最新文献

英文 中文
Who Does What to Whom? Making Text Parsers Work for Sociological Inquiry 谁对谁做了什么?使文本解析器为社会学研究工作
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI: 10.1177/00491241221099551
Oscar Stuhler
Over the past decade, sociologists have become increasingly interested in the formal study of semantic relations within text. Most contemporary studies focus either on mapping concept co-occurrences or on measuring semantic associations via word embeddings. Although conducive to many research goals, these approaches share an important limitation: they abstract away what one can call the event structure of texts, that is, the narrative action that takes place in them. I aim to overcome this limitation by introducing a new framework for extracting semantically rich relations from text that involves three components. First, a semantic grammar structured around textual entities that distinguishes six motif classes: actions of an entity, treatments of an entity, agents acting upon an entity, patients acted upon by an entity, characterizations of an entity, and possessions of an entity; second, a comprehensive set of mapping rules, which make it possible to recover motifs from predictions of dependency parsers; third, an R package that allows researchers to extract motifs from their own texts. The framework is demonstrated in empirical analyses on gendered interaction in novels and constructions of collective identity by U.S. presidential candidates.
在过去的十年里,社会学家对文本中语义关系的正式研究越来越感兴趣。大多数当代研究要么集中在映射概念共现,要么通过词嵌入来测量语义关联。尽管这些方法有助于许多研究目标,但它们都有一个重要的局限性:它们抽象了人们可以称之为文本的事件结构,即发生在文本中的叙事行为。为了克服这一限制,我引入了一个新的框架,用于从文本中提取语义丰富的关系,该框架涉及三个组件。首先,围绕文本实体构建的语义语法区分了六个母题类别:实体的行为、实体的治疗、作用于实体的主体、实体作用于实体的患者、实体的特征和实体的占有;第二,一套全面的映射规则,这使得从依赖解析器的预测中恢复主题成为可能;第三,一个R包,允许研究人员从他们自己的文本中提取主题。通过对小说中的性别互动和美国总统候选人集体认同建构的实证分析,证明了这一框架。
{"title":"Who Does What to Whom? Making Text Parsers Work for Sociological Inquiry","authors":"Oscar Stuhler","doi":"10.1177/00491241221099551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221099551","url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade, sociologists have become increasingly interested in the formal study of semantic relations within text. Most contemporary studies focus either on mapping concept co-occurrences or on measuring semantic associations via word embeddings. Although conducive to many research goals, these approaches share an important limitation: they abstract away what one can call the event structure of texts, that is, the narrative action that takes place in them. I aim to overcome this limitation by introducing a new framework for extracting semantically rich relations from text that involves three components. First, a semantic grammar structured around textual entities that distinguishes six motif classes: actions of an entity, treatments of an entity, agents acting upon an entity, patients acted upon by an entity, characterizations of an entity, and possessions of an entity; second, a comprehensive set of mapping rules, which make it possible to recover motifs from predictions of dependency parsers; third, an R package that allows researchers to extract motifs from their own texts. The framework is demonstrated in empirical analyses on gendered interaction in novels and constructions of collective identity by U.S. presidential candidates.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43636799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Language-Based Method for Assessing Symbolic Boundary Maintenance between Social Groups 一种基于语言的社会群体间符号边界维护评估方法
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI: 10.1177/00491241221099555
Anjali M. Bhatt, Amir Goldberg, S. Srivastava
When the social boundaries between groups are breached, the tendency for people to erect and maintain symbolic boundaries intensifies. Drawing on extant perspectives on boundary maintenance, we distinguish between two strategies that people pursue in maintaining symbolic boundaries: boundary retention—entrenching themselves in pre-existing symbolic distinctions—and boundary reformation—innovating new forms of symbolic distinction. Traditional approaches to measuring symbolic boundaries—interviews, participant-observation, and self-reports are ill-suited to detecting fine-grained variation in boundary maintenance. To overcome this limitation, we use the tools of computational linguistics and machine learning to develop a novel approach to measuring symbolic boundaries based on interactional language use between group members before and after they encounter one another. We construct measures of boundary retention and reformation using random forest classifiers that quantify group differences based on pre- and post-contact linguistic styles. We demonstrate this method's utility by applying it to a corpus of email communications from a mid-sized financial services firm that acquired and integrated two smaller firms. We find that: (a) the persistence of symbolic boundaries can be detected for up to 18 months after a merger; (b) acquired employees exhibit more boundary reformation and less boundary retention than their counterparts from the acquiring firm; and (c) individuals engage in more boundary retention, but not reformation, when their local work environment is more densely populated by ingroup members. We discuss implications of these findings for the study of culture in a wide range of intergroup contexts and for computational approaches to measuring culture.
当群体之间的社会界限被打破时,人们建立和维持象征性界限的倾向就会加剧。根据现有的关于边界维持的观点,我们区分了人们在维持符号边界时采取的两种策略:边界保留——在已有的符号区别中巩固自己——和边界改革——创新新的符号区别形式。测量符号边界的传统方法——访谈、参与者观察和自我报告——不适合检测边界维护中的细粒度变化。为了克服这一限制,我们使用计算语言学和机器学习的工具来开发一种新的方法来测量符号边界,该方法基于群体成员在彼此相遇之前和之后之间的交互式语言使用。我们使用随机森林分类器构建边界保留和改革的措施,该分类器基于接触前和接触后的语言风格量化群体差异。我们通过将该方法应用于一家收购并整合了两家较小公司的中型金融服务公司的电子邮件通信语料库来展示该方法的实用性。我们发现:(a)在合并后长达18个月的时间里,可以检测到符号边界的持久性;(b)与收购方的员工相比,被收购方员工表现出更多的边界改革和更少的边界保留;(c)当个人的本地工作环境中聚集了更多的内部成员时,他们会更多地保留边界,而不是进行改革。我们讨论了这些发现对广泛的群体间背景下的文化研究和测量文化的计算方法的影响。
{"title":"A Language-Based Method for Assessing Symbolic Boundary Maintenance between Social Groups","authors":"Anjali M. Bhatt, Amir Goldberg, S. Srivastava","doi":"10.1177/00491241221099555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221099555","url":null,"abstract":"When the social boundaries between groups are breached, the tendency for people to erect and maintain symbolic boundaries intensifies. Drawing on extant perspectives on boundary maintenance, we distinguish between two strategies that people pursue in maintaining symbolic boundaries: boundary retention—entrenching themselves in pre-existing symbolic distinctions—and boundary reformation—innovating new forms of symbolic distinction. Traditional approaches to measuring symbolic boundaries—interviews, participant-observation, and self-reports are ill-suited to detecting fine-grained variation in boundary maintenance. To overcome this limitation, we use the tools of computational linguistics and machine learning to develop a novel approach to measuring symbolic boundaries based on interactional language use between group members before and after they encounter one another. We construct measures of boundary retention and reformation using random forest classifiers that quantify group differences based on pre- and post-contact linguistic styles. We demonstrate this method's utility by applying it to a corpus of email communications from a mid-sized financial services firm that acquired and integrated two smaller firms. We find that: (a) the persistence of symbolic boundaries can be detected for up to 18 months after a merger; (b) acquired employees exhibit more boundary reformation and less boundary retention than their counterparts from the acquiring firm; and (c) individuals engage in more boundary retention, but not reformation, when their local work environment is more densely populated by ingroup members. We discuss implications of these findings for the study of culture in a wide range of intergroup contexts and for computational approaches to measuring culture.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48787423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
BIC extensions for order-constrained model selection. 用于订单约束模型选择的BIC扩展。
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/0049124119882459
J Mulder, A E Raftery

The Schwarz or Bayesian information criterion (BIC) is one of the most widely used tools for model comparison in social science research. The BIC however is not suitable for evaluating models with order constraints on the parameters of interest. This paper explores two extensions of the BIC for evaluating order constrained models, one where a truncated unit information prior is used under the order-constrained model, and the other where a truncated local unit information prior is used. The first prior is centered around the maximum likelihood estimate and the latter prior is centered around a null value. Several analyses show that the order-constrained BIC based on the local unit information prior works better as an Occam's razor for evaluating order-constrained models and results in lower error probabilities. The methodology based on the local unit information prior is implemented in the R package 'BFpack' which allows researchers to easily apply the method for order-constrained model selection. The usefulness of the methodology is illustrated using data from the European Values Study.

施瓦茨或贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)是社会科学研究中使用最广泛的模型比较工具之一。然而,BIC不适合评估对感兴趣的参数有顺序约束的模型。本文探讨了两种用于评估订单约束模型的BIC扩展,一种是在订单约束模型下使用截断的单元信息先验,另一种是使用截断的局部单元信息先验。第一个先验以最大似然估计为中心,后一个先验以空值为中心。一些分析表明,基于局部单元信息先验的订单约束BIC作为评估订单约束模型的奥卡姆剃刀效果更好,并且误差概率更低。基于局部单元信息先验的方法在R包“BFpack”中实现,使研究人员能够轻松地将该方法应用于订单约束模型选择。欧洲价值观研究的数据说明了该方法的有效性。
{"title":"BIC extensions for order-constrained model selection.","authors":"J Mulder,&nbsp;A E Raftery","doi":"10.1177/0049124119882459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Schwarz or Bayesian information criterion (BIC) is one of the most widely used tools for model comparison in social science research. The BIC however is not suitable for evaluating models with order constraints on the parameters of interest. This paper explores two extensions of the BIC for evaluating order constrained models, one where a truncated unit information prior is used under the order-constrained model, and the other where a truncated local unit information prior is used. The first prior is centered around the maximum likelihood estimate and the latter prior is centered around a null value. Several analyses show that the order-constrained BIC based on the local unit information prior works better as an Occam's razor for evaluating order-constrained models and results in lower error probabilities. The methodology based on the local unit information prior is implemented in the R package 'BFpack' which allows researchers to easily apply the method for order-constrained model selection. The usefulness of the methodology is illustrated using data from the European Values Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0049124119882459","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40491402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Meta-Analysis in Sociological Research: Power and Heterogeneity. 社会学研究中的元分析:权力与异质性。
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-20 DOI: 10.1177/0049124119882479
Guangyu Tong, Guang Guo

Meta-analysis is a statistical method that combines quantitative findings from previous studies. It has been increasingly used to obtain more credible results in a wide range of scientific fields. Combining the results of relevant studies allows researchers to leverage study similarities while modeling potential sources of between-study heterogeneity. This paper provides a review of the core methodologies of meta-analysis that we consider most relevant to sociological research. After developing the foundation of the fixed-effects and random-effects models of meta-analysis, this paper illustrates the utility of the method with regression coefficients reported from two sets of social science studies. We explain the various steps of the process including constructing the meta-sample from primary studies; estimating the fixed- and random-effects models; analyzing the source of heterogeneity across studies; assessing publication bias. We conclude with a discussion of steps that could be taken to strengthen the development of meta-analysis in sociological research, which will eventually increase the credibility of sociological inquiry via a knowledge-cumulative process.

荟萃分析是一种统计方法,结合了以往研究的定量结果。它已越来越多地用于在广泛的科学领域获得更可靠的结果。结合相关研究的结果,研究人员可以利用研究的相似性,同时对研究间异质性的潜在来源进行建模。本文回顾了我们认为与社会学研究最相关的元分析的核心方法。在建立了元分析的固定效应和随机效应模型的基础之后,本文用两组社会科学研究报告的回归系数说明了该方法的实用性。我们解释了这个过程的各个步骤,包括从主要研究中构建元样本;固定效应和随机效应模型的估计;分析各研究的异质性来源;评估发表偏倚。最后,我们讨论了可以采取的步骤,以加强社会学研究中元分析的发展,这将最终通过知识积累过程提高社会学调查的可信度。
{"title":"Meta-Analysis in Sociological Research: Power and Heterogeneity.","authors":"Guangyu Tong,&nbsp;Guang Guo","doi":"10.1177/0049124119882479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meta-analysis is a statistical method that combines quantitative findings from previous studies. It has been increasingly used to obtain more credible results in a wide range of scientific fields. Combining the results of relevant studies allows researchers to leverage study similarities while modeling potential sources of between-study heterogeneity. This paper provides a review of the core methodologies of meta-analysis that we consider most relevant to sociological research. After developing the foundation of the fixed-effects and random-effects models of meta-analysis, this paper illustrates the utility of the method with regression coefficients reported from two sets of social science studies. We explain the various steps of the process including constructing the meta-sample from primary studies; estimating the fixed- and random-effects models; analyzing the source of heterogeneity across studies; assessing publication bias. We conclude with a discussion of steps that could be taken to strengthen the development of meta-analysis in sociological research, which will eventually increase the credibility of sociological inquiry via a knowledge-cumulative process.</p>","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0049124119882479","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40400611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Why Measurement Invariance is Important in Comparative Research. A Response to Welzel et al. (2021) 为什么测量不变性在比较研究中很重要。对Welzel等人的回应(2021)
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-04-21 DOI: 10.1177/00491241221091755
B. Meuleman, Tomasz Żółtak, A. Pokropek, E. Davidov, B. Muthén, Daniel L. Oberski, J. Billiet, Peter Schmidt
Welzel et al. (2021) claim that non-invariance of instruments is inconclusive and inconsequential in the field for cross-cultural value measurement. In this response, we contend that several key arguments on which Welzel et al. (2021) base their critique of invariance testing are conceptually and statistically incorrect. First, Welzel et al. (2021) claim that value measurement follows a formative rather than reflective logic. Yet they do not provide sufficient theoretical arguments for this conceptualization, nor do they discuss the disadvantages of this approach for validation of instruments. Second, their claim that strong inter-item correlations cannot be retrieved when means are close to the endpoint of scales ignores the existence of factor-analytic approaches for ordered-categorical indicators. Third, Welzel et al. (2021) propose that rather than of relying on invariance tests, comparability can be assessed by studying the connection with theoretically related constructs. However, their proposal ignores that external validation through nomological linkages hinges on the assumption of comparability. By means of two examples, we illustrate that violating the assumptions of measurement invariance can distort conclusions substantially. Following the advice of Welzel et al. (2021) implies discarding a tool that has proven to be very useful for comparativists.
Welzel等人(2021)声称,在跨文化价值测量领域,工具的非不变性是不确定的,也是无关紧要的。在这一回应中,我们认为Welzel等人(2021)对不变性测试的批评所基于的几个关键论点在概念上和统计上都是不正确的。首先,Welzel等人(2021)声称,价值衡量遵循形成性而非反思性逻辑。然而,他们没有为这种概念化提供足够的理论论据,也没有讨论这种方法在文书验证方面的缺点。其次,他们声称,当均值接近量表的终点时,无法检索到强的项目间相关性,这忽略了有序分类指标的因素分析方法的存在。第三,Welzel等人(2021)提出,与其依赖不变性检验,不如通过研究与理论相关结构的联系来评估可比性。然而,他们的建议忽略了通过法理联系进行的外部验证取决于可比性的假设。通过两个例子,我们说明了违反测量不变性的假设会严重扭曲结论。遵循Welzel等人的建议。(2021)意味着放弃一种已被证明对比较主义者非常有用的工具。
{"title":"Why Measurement Invariance is Important in Comparative Research. A Response to Welzel et al. (2021)","authors":"B. Meuleman, Tomasz Żółtak, A. Pokropek, E. Davidov, B. Muthén, Daniel L. Oberski, J. Billiet, Peter Schmidt","doi":"10.1177/00491241221091755","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221091755","url":null,"abstract":"Welzel et al. (2021) claim that non-invariance of instruments is inconclusive and inconsequential in the field for cross-cultural value measurement. In this response, we contend that several key arguments on which Welzel et al. (2021) base their critique of invariance testing are conceptually and statistically incorrect. First, Welzel et al. (2021) claim that value measurement follows a formative rather than reflective logic. Yet they do not provide sufficient theoretical arguments for this conceptualization, nor do they discuss the disadvantages of this approach for validation of instruments. Second, their claim that strong inter-item correlations cannot be retrieved when means are close to the endpoint of scales ignores the existence of factor-analytic approaches for ordered-categorical indicators. Third, Welzel et al. (2021) propose that rather than of relying on invariance tests, comparability can be assessed by studying the connection with theoretically related constructs. However, their proposal ignores that external validation through nomological linkages hinges on the assumption of comparability. By means of two examples, we illustrate that violating the assumptions of measurement invariance can distort conclusions substantially. Following the advice of Welzel et al. (2021) implies discarding a tool that has proven to be very useful for comparativists.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46916158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Against the Mainstream: On the Limitations of Non-Invariance Diagnostics: Response to Fischer et al. and Meuleman et al. 反对主流:论非不变诊断的局限性:对Fischer等人与Meuleman等人的回应。
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI: 10.1177/00491241221091754
C. Welzel, S. Kruse, Lennart Brunkert
Our original 2021 SMR article “Non-Invariance? An Overstated Problem with Misconceived Causes” disputes the conclusiveness of non-invariance diagnostics in diverse cross-cultural settings. Our critique targets the increasingly fashionable use of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA), especially in its mainstream version. We document—both by mathematical proof and an empirical illustration—that non-invariance is an arithmetic artifact of group mean disparity on closed-ended scales. Precisely this arti-factualness renders standard non-invariance markers inconclusive of measurement inequivalence under group-mean diversity. Using the Emancipative Values Index (EVI), OA-Section 3 of our original article demonstrates that such artifactual non-invariance is inconsequential for multi-item constructs’ cross-cultural performance in nomological terms, that is, explanatory power and predictive quality. Given these limitations of standard non-invariance diagnostics, we challenge the unquestioned authority of invariance tests as a tool of measurement validation. Our critique provoked two teams of authors to launch counter-critiques. We are grateful to the two comments because they give us a welcome opportunity to restate our position in greater clarity. Before addressing the comments one by one, we reformulate our key propositions more succinctly.
我们2021年SMR的原创文章《非不变性?一个有错误原因的过度陈述问题》对非不变性诊断在不同跨文化环境中的结论性提出了质疑。我们的批评针对的是越来越流行的多组确证因子分析(MGCFA)的使用,尤其是在其主流版本中。我们通过数学证明和经验说明证明,非不变性是封闭尺度上群平均视差的算术伪影。正是这种人为的事实性使得标准的非不变性标记在群均值多样性下的测量不等价性是不确定的。利用解放价值指数(EVI),OA在我们原文章的第3节中证明,这种人为的非不变性对于多项目结构在法理方面的跨文化表现,即解释力和预测质量来说是无关紧要的。鉴于标准非不变性诊断的这些局限性,我们对不变性测试作为测量验证工具的权威性提出了质疑。我们的批评激起了两个作者团队的反批评。我们感谢这两项评论,因为它们给了我们一个更明确地重申我们立场的机会。在逐一讨论这些意见之前,我们更简洁地重新表述了我们的主要主张。
{"title":"Against the Mainstream: On the Limitations of Non-Invariance Diagnostics: Response to Fischer et al. and Meuleman et al.","authors":"C. Welzel, S. Kruse, Lennart Brunkert","doi":"10.1177/00491241221091754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221091754","url":null,"abstract":"Our original 2021 SMR article “Non-Invariance? An Overstated Problem with Misconceived Causes” disputes the conclusiveness of non-invariance diagnostics in diverse cross-cultural settings. Our critique targets the increasingly fashionable use of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA), especially in its mainstream version. We document—both by mathematical proof and an empirical illustration—that non-invariance is an arithmetic artifact of group mean disparity on closed-ended scales. Precisely this arti-factualness renders standard non-invariance markers inconclusive of measurement inequivalence under group-mean diversity. Using the Emancipative Values Index (EVI), OA-Section 3 of our original article demonstrates that such artifactual non-invariance is inconsequential for multi-item constructs’ cross-cultural performance in nomological terms, that is, explanatory power and predictive quality. Given these limitations of standard non-invariance diagnostics, we challenge the unquestioned authority of invariance tests as a tool of measurement validation. Our critique provoked two teams of authors to launch counter-critiques. We are grateful to the two comments because they give us a welcome opportunity to restate our position in greater clarity. Before addressing the comments one by one, we reformulate our key propositions more succinctly.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41829124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abductive Coding: Theory Building and Qualitative (Re)Analysis 溯因编码:理论建构与定性(再)分析
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1177/00491241211067508
L. Vila‐Henninger, C. Dupuy, Virginie Van Ingelgom, M. Caprioli, Ferdinand Teuber, Damien Pennetreau, Margherita Bussi, Cal Le Gall
Qualitative secondary analysis has generated heated debate regarding the epistemology of qualitative research. We argue that shifting to an abductive approach provides a fruitful avenue for qualitative secondary analysts who are oriented towards theory-building. However, the concrete implementation of abduction remains underdeveloped—especially for coding. We address this key gap by outlining a set of tactics for abductive analysis that can be applied for qualitative analysis. Our approach applies Timmermans and Tavory's ( Timmermans and Tavory 2012 ; Tavory and Timmermans 2014 ) three stages of abduction in three steps for qualitative (secondary) analysis: Generating an Abductive Codebook, Abductive Data Reduction through Code Equations, and In-Depth Abductive Qualitative Analysis. A key contribution of our article is the development of “code equations”—defined as the combination of codes to operationalize phenomena that span individual codes. Code equations are an important resource for abduction and other qualitative approaches that leverage qualitative data to build theory.
定性二次分析引起了关于定性研究认识论的激烈争论。我们认为,转向溯因方法为面向理论建设的定性二级分析师提供了富有成效的途径。然而,绑架的具体实现仍然不发达,特别是在编码方面。我们通过概述一套可用于定性分析的溯因分析策略来解决这一关键差距。我们的方法采用Timmermans和Tavory的(Timmermans and Tavory 2012;Tavory和Timmermans 2014)定性(二级)分析的三个阶段:生成溯因代码本,通过代码方程进行溯因数据简化,以及深入溯因定性分析。我们文章的一个关键贡献是“代码方程”的发展——定义为代码的组合,以实现跨越单个代码的现象。代码方程是溯因法和其他利用定性数据构建理论的定性方法的重要资源。
{"title":"Abductive Coding: Theory Building and Qualitative (Re)Analysis","authors":"L. Vila‐Henninger, C. Dupuy, Virginie Van Ingelgom, M. Caprioli, Ferdinand Teuber, Damien Pennetreau, Margherita Bussi, Cal Le Gall","doi":"10.1177/00491241211067508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508","url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative secondary analysis has generated heated debate regarding the epistemology of qualitative research. We argue that shifting to an abductive approach provides a fruitful avenue for qualitative secondary analysts who are oriented towards theory-building. However, the concrete implementation of abduction remains underdeveloped—especially for coding. We address this key gap by outlining a set of tactics for abductive analysis that can be applied for qualitative analysis. Our approach applies Timmermans and Tavory's ( Timmermans and Tavory 2012 ; Tavory and Timmermans 2014 ) three stages of abduction in three steps for qualitative (secondary) analysis: Generating an Abductive Codebook, Abductive Data Reduction through Code Equations, and In-Depth Abductive Qualitative Analysis. A key contribution of our article is the development of “code equations”—defined as the combination of codes to operationalize phenomena that span individual codes. Code equations are an important resource for abduction and other qualitative approaches that leverage qualitative data to build theory.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46997816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
In Search of a Comparable Measure of Generalized Individual Religiosity in the World Values Survey 在世界价值观调查中寻找广义个人宗教信仰的可比衡量标准
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-02-09 DOI: 10.1177/00491241221077239
A. Remizova, M. Rudnev, E. Davidov
Individual religiosity measures are used by researchers to describe and compare individuals and societies. However, the cross-cultural comparability of the measures has often been questioned but rarely empirically tested. In the current study, we examined the cross-national measurement invariance properties of generalized individual religiosity in the sixth wave of the World Values Survey. For the analysis, we used multiple group confirmatory factor analysis and alignment. Our results demonstrated that a theoretically driven measurement model was not invariant across all countries. We suggested four unidimensional measurement models and four overlapping groups of countries in which these measurement models demonstrated approximate invariance. The indicators that covered praying practices, importance of religion, and confidence in its institutions were more cross-nationally invariant than other indicators.
研究人员使用个人宗教信仰测量来描述和比较个人和社会。然而,这些措施的跨文化可比性经常受到质疑,但很少经过实证检验。在当前的研究中,我们在第六波世界价值观调查中检验了广义个人宗教信仰的跨国家测量不变性。在分析中,我们使用了多组验证性因素分析和比对。我们的研究结果表明,理论驱动的测量模型并非在所有国家都是不变的。我们提出了四个一维测量模型和四个重叠的国家组,这些测量模型在这些国家组中表现出近似不变性。与其他指标相比,涵盖祈祷实践、宗教重要性和对其机构的信心的指标在全国范围内更为不变。
{"title":"In Search of a Comparable Measure of Generalized Individual Religiosity in the World Values Survey","authors":"A. Remizova, M. Rudnev, E. Davidov","doi":"10.1177/00491241221077239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221077239","url":null,"abstract":"Individual religiosity measures are used by researchers to describe and compare individuals and societies. However, the cross-cultural comparability of the measures has often been questioned but rarely empirically tested. In the current study, we examined the cross-national measurement invariance properties of generalized individual religiosity in the sixth wave of the World Values Survey. For the analysis, we used multiple group confirmatory factor analysis and alignment. Our results demonstrated that a theoretically driven measurement model was not invariant across all countries. We suggested four unidimensional measurement models and four overlapping groups of countries in which these measurement models demonstrated approximate invariance. The indicators that covered praying practices, importance of religion, and confidence in its institutions were more cross-nationally invariant than other indicators.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46774458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Visual Design and Cognition in List-Style Open-Ended Questions in Web Probing 网页探究中开放式问题的视觉设计与认知
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-02-08 DOI: 10.1177/00491241221077241
Katharina Meitinger, Tanja Kunz

Previous research reveals that the visual design of open-ended questions should match the response task so that respondents can infer the expected response format. Based on a web survey including specific probes in a list-style open-ended question format, we experimentally tested the effects of varying numbers of answer boxes on several indicators of response quality. Our results showed that using multiple small answer boxes instead of one large box had a positive impact on the number and variety of themes mentioned, as well as on the conciseness of responses to specific probes. We found no effect on the relevance of themes and the risk of item non-response. Based on our findings, we recommend using multiple small answer boxes instead of one large box to convey the expected response format and improve response quality in specific probes. This study makes a valuable contribution to the field of web probing, extends the concept of response quality in list-style open-ended questions, and provides a deeper understanding of how visual design features affect cognitive response processes in web surveys.

以往的研究表明,开放式问题的视觉设计应该与回答任务相匹配,以便被调查者能够推断出预期的回答格式。基于一项包含列表式开放式问题格式的特定探针的网络调查,我们实验测试了不同数量的答案框对几个响应质量指标的影响。我们的研究结果表明,使用多个小的回答框而不是一个大的回答框对提到的主题的数量和种类以及对特定问题的回答的简洁性都有积极的影响。我们发现对主题的相关性和项目无反应的风险没有影响。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议使用多个小的回答框而不是一个大的回答框来传达预期的回答格式,并提高特定探针的回答质量。本研究对网络探索领域做出了重要贡献,扩展了列表式开放式问题中回答质量的概念,并对视觉设计特征如何影响网络调查中的认知反应过程提供了更深入的理解。
{"title":"Visual Design and Cognition in List-Style Open-Ended Questions in Web Probing","authors":"Katharina Meitinger, Tanja Kunz","doi":"10.1177/00491241221077241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221077241","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research reveals that the visual design of open-ended questions should match the response task so that respondents can infer the expected response format. Based on a web survey including specific probes in a list-style open-ended question format, we experimentally tested the effects of varying numbers of answer boxes on several indicators of response quality. Our results showed that using multiple small answer boxes instead of one large box had a positive impact on the number and variety of themes mentioned, as well as on the conciseness of responses to specific probes. We found no effect on the relevance of themes and the risk of item non-response. Based on our findings, we recommend using multiple small answer boxes instead of one large box to convey the expected response format and improve response quality in specific probes. This study makes a valuable contribution to the field of web probing, extends the concept of response quality in list-style open-ended questions, and provides a deeper understanding of how visual design features affect cognitive response processes in web surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138506061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Single- and Multiple-Question Designs of Measuring Family Income in China Family Panel Studies 中国家庭面板研究中衡量家庭收入的单题与多题设计比较
IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-02-08 DOI: 10.1177/00491241221077238
Qiong Wu, Li-na Gu
Family income questions in general purpose surveys are usually collected with either a single-question summary design or a multiple-question disaggregation design. It is unclear how estimates from the two approaches agree with each other. The current paper takes advantage of a large-scale survey that has collected family income with both methods. With data from 14,222 urban and rural families in the 2018 wave of the nationally representative China Family Panel Studies, we compare the two estimates, and further evaluate factors that might contribute to the discrepancy. We find that the two estimates are loosely matched in only a third of all families, and most of the matched families have a simple income structure. Although the mean of the multiple-question estimate is larger than that of the single-question estimate, the pattern is not monotonic. At lower percentiles up till the median, the single-question estimate is larger, whereas the multiple-question estimate is larger at higher percentiles. Larger family sizes and more income sources contribute to higher likelihood of inconsistent estimates from the two designs. Families with wage income as the main income source have the highest likelihood of giving consistent estimates compared with all other families. In contrast, families with agricultural income or property income as the main source tend to have very high probability of larger single-question estimates. Omission of certain income components and rounding can explain over half of the inconsistencies with higher multiple-question estimates and a quarter of the inconsistencies with higher single-question estimates.
一般目的调查中的家庭收入问题通常采用单题摘要设计或多题分类设计。目前尚不清楚这两种方法的估计如何相互一致。本文利用了一项大规模的调查,用这两种方法收集了家庭收入。利用2018年具有全国代表性的中国家庭面板研究(China Family Panel Studies)中来自14222个城乡家庭的数据,我们比较了这两种估计,并进一步评估了可能导致差异的因素。我们发现,只有三分之一的家庭的两种估计是松散匹配的,而大多数匹配的家庭的收入结构都很简单。虽然多题估计的平均值大于单题估计的平均值,但其模式并非单调的。从较低的百分位数到中位数,单题估计值更大,而在较高的百分位数,多题估计值更大。较大的家庭规模和更多的收入来源导致两种设计的估计不一致的可能性更高。与所有其他家庭相比,以工资收入为主要收入来源的家庭给出一致估计的可能性最高。相比之下,以农业收入或财产性收入为主要来源的家庭往往有很高的概率得到更大的单题估计。某些收入成分的遗漏和四舍五入可以解释超过一半的与较高的多题估计不一致和四分之一的与较高的单题估计不一致。
{"title":"Comparing Single- and Multiple-Question Designs of Measuring Family Income in China Family Panel Studies","authors":"Qiong Wu, Li-na Gu","doi":"10.1177/00491241221077238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221077238","url":null,"abstract":"Family income questions in general purpose surveys are usually collected with either a single-question summary design or a multiple-question disaggregation design. It is unclear how estimates from the two approaches agree with each other. The current paper takes advantage of a large-scale survey that has collected family income with both methods. With data from 14,222 urban and rural families in the 2018 wave of the nationally representative China Family Panel Studies, we compare the two estimates, and further evaluate factors that might contribute to the discrepancy. We find that the two estimates are loosely matched in only a third of all families, and most of the matched families have a simple income structure. Although the mean of the multiple-question estimate is larger than that of the single-question estimate, the pattern is not monotonic. At lower percentiles up till the median, the single-question estimate is larger, whereas the multiple-question estimate is larger at higher percentiles. Larger family sizes and more income sources contribute to higher likelihood of inconsistent estimates from the two designs. Families with wage income as the main income source have the highest likelihood of giving consistent estimates compared with all other families. In contrast, families with agricultural income or property income as the main source tend to have very high probability of larger single-question estimates. Omission of certain income components and rounding can explain over half of the inconsistencies with higher multiple-question estimates and a quarter of the inconsistencies with higher single-question estimates.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47384693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Sociological Methods & Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1