Objective
To assess the quantity and quality of studies investigating the impact of vaccine reactogenicity, defined as local (e.g. injection-site pain, redness, swelling) and systemic (e.g. fever, myalgia, headache) symptoms, on willingness to accept influenza vaccination.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted on literature published from 1979 to May 2024 using 6 databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined using the SPIDER framework., Studies were restricted to peer-reviewed studies of adults (≥18 years) examining influenza vaccination. Included publications were categorised according to how vaccine side effects were reported i.e. general side effects, general side effects plus contracting influenza, or reactogenicity. National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tools were used to assess the quality of included publications.
Results
Of 462 publications charted, 353 (76 %) reported perceived or experienced general side effects as reasons for non-vaccination; 48 (10 %) reported general side effects and contracting influenza; and 61 (13 %) reported vaccine reactogenicity. Of the 61 studies reporting or specifying reactogenicity, 11 (18 %) reported both experienced and anticipated reactogenicity, 12 (20 %) reported anticipated reactogenicity, and 38 (62 %) reported experienced reactogenicity. Most studies were rated fair quality (n = 57), with two good and two poor. Twenty-one studies investigated associations between reactogenicity and uptake (willingness or actual vaccination). Of these, 11 examined experienced reactogenicity; the majority (9 of 11) found that individuals who experienced local or systemic reactions perceived themselves to be less likely to accept vaccination in future seasons.
Conclusions
While side effects are frequently cited as reasons for non-vaccination, there is a dearth of high-quality studies specifically addressing the impact of reactogenicity on influenza vaccine willingness. Although most suggest a link between experienced reactogenicity and reduced future intention to vaccinate, heterogeneity in study design and quality precludes firm conclusions. Understanding the implications of reactogenicity is essential to inform strategies that improve coverage and guide intervention design.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
