Vision Research最新文献

The receptive field (RF) is the fundamental processing unit of human vision; both masking and crowding depend on its size. The RF has a psychophysical corresponding term, the perceptive field (PF); whereas the RF is measured physiologically, the PF is measured psychophysically (a perceptual response). We investigated how spatial (lateral interactions), temporal (the stimulus presentation time), and the procedure affect the PF size for both monocular and binocular viewing. The stimuli consisted of a central vertically oriented Gabor target and high-contrast Gabor flankers positioned in two configurations (orthogonal or collinear) with target-flanker separations of either 2 or 3 wavelengths (λ). We used two main methods to control the monocular and binocular vision: mono-optic glasses vs. stereo glasses. The presentation order was either mixed or non-mixed for the presentation time and the eye condition. We estimated the PF size for both monocular and binocular viewing at 4 different presentation times (40, 80,120, and 200 ms) with different orders of presentation in each experiment (mono-optic glasses vs. stereo glasses, utilizing the lateral masking paradigm). In each experiment we explored one variable: how changing one parameter would affect the PF size in both monocular and binocular viewing (the temporal duration, the testing order of conditions, and the spatial distance) while keeping the others constant. We found that both the monocular and binocular PF size were dynamic and were significantly affected by the presentation order, leading to reduced lateral suppression under the collinear 2λ condition. Hence, both the monocular and binocular PF size depended on the sequence of the stimulus presentation time and the testing order of the conditions. Furthermore, we found that the binocular PF size was significantly larger than the monocular PF size.

A quintessential sentinel of cell health, the membrane potential in nonexcitable cells integrates biochemical and biomechanical inputs, determines the driving force for ionic currents activated by input signals and plays critical functions in cellular differentiation, signaling, and pathology. The identity and properties of ion channels that subserve the resting potential in trabecular meshwork (TM) cells is poorly understood, which impairs our understanding of intraocular pressure regulation in healthy and diseased eyes. Here, we identified a powerful cationic conductance that subserves the TM resting potential. It disappears following Na⁺ removal or substitution with choline or NMDG⁺, is insensitive to TTX, verapamil, phenamil methanesulfonate, amiloride and GsMTx4, is substituted by Li⁺ and Cs⁺, and inhibited by Gd³⁺ and Ruthenium Red. Constitutive cation influx is thus not mediated by voltage-operated Na⁺, Ca²⁺, epithelial Na⁺ (ENaC) channels, Piezo channels or Na⁺/H⁺ exchange but may involve TRP-like channels. Transcriptional analysis detected expression of many TRP genes, with the transcriptome pool dominated by TRPC1 followed by expression of TRPV1, TRPC3, TRPV4 and TRPC5. Pyr3 and Pico1,4,5 did not affect the standing current whereas SKF96365 promoted rather than suppressed, Na⁺ influx. SEA-0400 induced a modest hyperpolarization, indicating residual contribution from Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchange. The resting membrane potential in human TM cells is thus maintained by a constitutive monovalent cation leak current with properties not unlike those of TRP channels. This conductance is likely to influence conventional outflow by setting the homeostatic steady-state and by regulating the magnitude of pressure-induced currents in normotensive and hypertensive eyes.

Contrast demodulation and phase distortions are exaggerated in retinal images blurred by the higher-order wavefront aberrations of keratoconic eyes. While the performance loss from the former parameter is well understood, little is known about the impact of the latter on visual functions in this disease condition. The present study investigated the impact of phase distortions on the monocular logMAR visual acuity, letter discriminability and random-dot stereoacuity of seventeen visually healthy adults (ten for visual acuity and letter discriminability; ten for stereoacuity and three common to both experiments) using images that were computationally blurred by four different higher-order wavefront aberration profiles of keratoconic eyes that showed significant distortions in the phase spectrum. Participants viewed these images through 2 mm artificial pupils to negate their native ocular wavefront aberrations. The results showed progressive losses in visual acuity and stereoacuity with increasing blur, a third of which could be recovered following phase nullification. Letter discriminability also improved following phase nullification, more so for smaller than larger optotypes. Stereoacuity loss and, consequently, its recovery following phase nullification was more prominent for profiles simulating unilateral asymmetric keratoconus than for profiles simulating bilateral symmetric keratoconus. These results agree with previous reports obtained from blur induced with lower-order aberrations and indicate that a similar trend may be observed for more complex patterns of blur like keratoconus. Overall, both contrast demodulation and misalignment of the local features of the blurred image may contribute to losses of spatial and depth vision in keratoconus. Phase nullification may partially mitigate these losses, thereby allowing the processing of finer spatial details and veridical disparity estimations for improved depth perception.

Previous studies identified two visual stimuli that can shorten the human eye by thickening the choroid after short-term visual stimulation, potentially inhibiting myopia: (1) watching digitally filtered movies where the red plane has full spatial resolution while green and blue are low-pass filtered according to the human longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) function (the “red in focus” filter), and (2) reading text with inverted contrast. This study aimed to determine whether combining these two stimuli would have an additive effect on axial length. Twenty-two emmetropic subjects were recruited to read text (standard and inverted contrast) for 30 min from a large screen, 2 m away, either unfiltered or filtered with the “red in focus” filter. Axial length was measured before and after each reading episode using low-coherence interferometry (Lenstar LS 900, Haag Streit). Reading text with conventional contrast polarity (dark letters on a bright background) resulted in no significant axial length change. Adding the “red in focus” filter did not alter the outcome. Consistent with previous findings, reading inverted contrast text made emmetropic eyes shorter. Surprisingly, when the text was combined with the “red in focus” filter, eyes became longer rather than shorter. A possible explanation for this contradictory result is that, for the text stimulus, the “red in focus” filter removes spatial information in the blue channel needed by the retina to use LCA analysis to thicken the choroid.