Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108467
S Sinem Atakan, Hazal Duman Alptekin
Texture is a central component of consumers' food experiences, often rivaling taste and aroma in importance. Although prior research has shown that emotions influence both the amount and type of food consumed, their impact on texture preferences remains unexplored. This research investigates whether, and how, two discrete negative emotions - anger and anxiety - shape mouth behavior preferences (e.g., crunching, squashing) and, consequently, preference for and attention to corresponding food textures (e.g., crunchy, mushy). Across two studies, we find that emotions elicit distinct mouth behavior tendencies aligned with their action tendencies. In Study 1 (N = 112), self-report data reveal that anger increases preference for crunching behavior, whereas anxiety increases preference for squashing behavior. In Study 2 (N = 53), electroencephalogram (EEG) data show that anger heightens attentional allocation to crunchy textures, while anxiety enhances attention to mushy textures, as reflected by the P300 component. Together, these findings contribute to the literatures on emotions, food texture preferences, oral haptics, sensory marketing, and neuromarketing. Specifically, the results elucidate how emotions drive texture preferences. Emotions can manifest in specific mouth behaviors consistent with their action tendencies, thereby shaping consumers' preferences for and attention to food textures congruent with those mouth behaviors. This suggests that texture preferences may be context-dependent rather than solely trait-based. Furthermore, the findings advance embodied emotion theory by demonstrating that discrete emotional states produce distinct neurophysiological patterns of attention and extend neuromarketing by illustrating the utility of EEG in capturing emotion-congruent biases in food perception.
{"title":"Crunch your anger, squash your anxiety: Impact of negative emotions on food texture preferences.","authors":"S Sinem Atakan, Hazal Duman Alptekin","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108467","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108467","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Texture is a central component of consumers' food experiences, often rivaling taste and aroma in importance. Although prior research has shown that emotions influence both the amount and type of food consumed, their impact on texture preferences remains unexplored. This research investigates whether, and how, two discrete negative emotions - anger and anxiety - shape mouth behavior preferences (e.g., crunching, squashing) and, consequently, preference for and attention to corresponding food textures (e.g., crunchy, mushy). Across two studies, we find that emotions elicit distinct mouth behavior tendencies aligned with their action tendencies. In Study 1 (N = 112), self-report data reveal that anger increases preference for crunching behavior, whereas anxiety increases preference for squashing behavior. In Study 2 (N = 53), electroencephalogram (EEG) data show that anger heightens attentional allocation to crunchy textures, while anxiety enhances attention to mushy textures, as reflected by the P300 component. Together, these findings contribute to the literatures on emotions, food texture preferences, oral haptics, sensory marketing, and neuromarketing. Specifically, the results elucidate how emotions drive texture preferences. Emotions can manifest in specific mouth behaviors consistent with their action tendencies, thereby shaping consumers' preferences for and attention to food textures congruent with those mouth behaviors. This suggests that texture preferences may be context-dependent rather than solely trait-based. Furthermore, the findings advance embodied emotion theory by demonstrating that discrete emotional states produce distinct neurophysiological patterns of attention and extend neuromarketing by illustrating the utility of EEG in capturing emotion-congruent biases in food perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108488
Tina Moffat, Robyn Berardi, Suvadra Datta Gupta, Rachel Engler-Stringer, Debbie Field, Katerina Maximova, Sarah Oresnik
Background & objective: Conducted in 2024 at the time of the Government of Canada's announcement about a new National School Food Program (NSFP), this study explores parents' and educators' perspectives on food, funding, and preferred attributes of an NSFP. Using an Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility (EDIA) lens, we consider how to create socially just School Food Programs (SFPs).
Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study in publicly funded primary schools in two urban regions of Ontario, Canada. Parents/caregivers completed an online survey about family socio-demographics and views on SFPs with 267 valid responses. Twenty-seven parents participated in six focus groups and six primary school educators were interviewed.
Results: Equitable accessibility, cultural food, and including interest holders and community partners were organizing themes from qualitative findings that were compared to quantitative survey data. Equitable accessibility to SFPs was conceptualized as universally affordable but not necessarily universally free. Accessibility for students with dietary requirements was considered with concerns about logistical challenges. Consideration of cultural food in SFPs encompassed student representation, educational benefits, and challenges for incorporating it. Some parents advocated for the inclusion of key interest holders - students and parents - in planning and implementation along with broader community partners.
Conclusions: Many participants envisioned SFPs that consider universal accessibility, cultural food diversity, and inclusive participation. Embedding EDIA in program design is key to socially just SFPs but questions remain about how to achieve this. We recommend that local level data are collected with interest holder consultation.
{"title":"Parent and educator perspectives on the development of a National School Food Program in Canada related to equity, diversity, inclusion and access (EDIA).","authors":"Tina Moffat, Robyn Berardi, Suvadra Datta Gupta, Rachel Engler-Stringer, Debbie Field, Katerina Maximova, Sarah Oresnik","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108488","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108488","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Conducted in 2024 at the time of the Government of Canada's announcement about a new National School Food Program (NSFP), this study explores parents' and educators' perspectives on food, funding, and preferred attributes of an NSFP. Using an Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility (EDIA) lens, we consider how to create socially just School Food Programs (SFPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study in publicly funded primary schools in two urban regions of Ontario, Canada. Parents/caregivers completed an online survey about family socio-demographics and views on SFPs with 267 valid responses. Twenty-seven parents participated in six focus groups and six primary school educators were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Equitable accessibility, cultural food, and including interest holders and community partners were organizing themes from qualitative findings that were compared to quantitative survey data. Equitable accessibility to SFPs was conceptualized as universally affordable but not necessarily universally free. Accessibility for students with dietary requirements was considered with concerns about logistical challenges. Consideration of cultural food in SFPs encompassed student representation, educational benefits, and challenges for incorporating it. Some parents advocated for the inclusion of key interest holders - students and parents - in planning and implementation along with broader community partners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many participants envisioned SFPs that consider universal accessibility, cultural food diversity, and inclusive participation. Embedding EDIA in program design is key to socially just SFPs but questions remain about how to achieve this. We recommend that local level data are collected with interest holder consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108483
Ezra Mutai, Matthew J Bauman, John J Durocher
The interactive effects of mindfulness and food characteristics on eating experiences remain poorly understood. This study examined whether a brief mindfulness intervention moderates the relationship between pasta quality and both hunger reduction and quality perception. Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design, 128 participants consumed either Barilla's premium or classic pasta, with or without a 3.5-min guided meditation focusing on sensory awareness and gratitude during a blind tasting experience. Results revealed a consistent moderation pattern: control participants showed marked differences between pasta types in both hunger reduction and quality ratings, whereas mindfulness participants responded uniformly across pasta types. Specifically, control participants experienced significantly greater hunger reduction after consuming premium versus classic pasta (p = 0.008), and unexpectedly subjectively rated classic pasta as higher quality than premium (p = 0.034). In contrast, mindfulness participants showed equivalent responses to both pasta types across all measures (all ps > 0.40). This pattern replicated across three outcomes: hunger reduction, composite satiety scores, and quality perception, with control participants consistently showing pasta-type effects and mindfulness participants showing none. These findings suggest that brief mindfulness interventions may normalize eating responses by reducing automatic reactions to food characteristics. Rather than relying on external food characteristics or expectations, mindfulness may orient attention toward internal bodily signals of hunger and satiety. While replication in larger samples is warranted, the consistent pattern across multiple measures provides preliminary evidence that even brief mindfulness practices may enhance eating awareness and reduce expectation-driven biases in food quality perception.
{"title":"Effects of a brief mindfulness intervention on hunger and quality perception during pasta consumption.","authors":"Ezra Mutai, Matthew J Bauman, John J Durocher","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108483","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108483","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interactive effects of mindfulness and food characteristics on eating experiences remain poorly understood. This study examined whether a brief mindfulness intervention moderates the relationship between pasta quality and both hunger reduction and quality perception. Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design, 128 participants consumed either Barilla's premium or classic pasta, with or without a 3.5-min guided meditation focusing on sensory awareness and gratitude during a blind tasting experience. Results revealed a consistent moderation pattern: control participants showed marked differences between pasta types in both hunger reduction and quality ratings, whereas mindfulness participants responded uniformly across pasta types. Specifically, control participants experienced significantly greater hunger reduction after consuming premium versus classic pasta (p = 0.008), and unexpectedly subjectively rated classic pasta as higher quality than premium (p = 0.034). In contrast, mindfulness participants showed equivalent responses to both pasta types across all measures (all ps > 0.40). This pattern replicated across three outcomes: hunger reduction, composite satiety scores, and quality perception, with control participants consistently showing pasta-type effects and mindfulness participants showing none. These findings suggest that brief mindfulness interventions may normalize eating responses by reducing automatic reactions to food characteristics. Rather than relying on external food characteristics or expectations, mindfulness may orient attention toward internal bodily signals of hunger and satiety. While replication in larger samples is warranted, the consistent pattern across multiple measures provides preliminary evidence that even brief mindfulness practices may enhance eating awareness and reduce expectation-driven biases in food quality perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108486
Lisa Tholen, Christa Blokhuis, Mattijs S Lambooij, Gillroy R L Fraser, Stefan A Lipman, Job van Exel, Marga C Ocké
Current consumption of animal-based protein sources is environmentally unsustainable and poses risks to human health, animal welfare, and food security. Policymakers in many countries seek to reduce the consumption of animal-based protein sources. However, this transition is affected by many factors, and it remains unclear how they interact and what their potential is for stimulating systemic change. This study synthesized stakeholders' perspectives on factors driving the consumption of animal- and plant-based protein sources into a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD), visualiing factors and their cause-and-effect relationships. Three Group Model Building sessions with 28 stakeholders (consumers, researchers, industry representatives, policymakers, interest group members) from the Netherlands informed the CLD. The Action Scales Model was used to categorize factors into system levels (events, structures, goals, and beliefs), providing insights into their potential for systemic change. The resulting CLD reveals the complexity of protein consumption across five interconnected subsystems: 1) Individual Aspects, 2) Social Interactions & Culture, 3) Physical Food Environment, 4) Food Industry & Natural Food Environment, and 5) Politics & Regulation. The high interconnectivity indicates isolated interventions are unlikely to be sufficient for systemic change, as feedback mechanisms may counteract or neutralize their effects. Addressing multiple elements across the system is thus essential to accelerate the protein transition. This study provides a foundation for understanding the system dynamics shaping consumption of animal- and plant-based protein sources. However, further research is needed to incorporate quantitative weighting, determine the relative importance of mechanisms and identify leverage points for systemic change to guide policy development.
{"title":"Understanding consumption of animal- and plant-based protein sources in the Netherlands: A stakeholder-driven causal loop diagram.","authors":"Lisa Tholen, Christa Blokhuis, Mattijs S Lambooij, Gillroy R L Fraser, Stefan A Lipman, Job van Exel, Marga C Ocké","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108486","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current consumption of animal-based protein sources is environmentally unsustainable and poses risks to human health, animal welfare, and food security. Policymakers in many countries seek to reduce the consumption of animal-based protein sources. However, this transition is affected by many factors, and it remains unclear how they interact and what their potential is for stimulating systemic change. This study synthesized stakeholders' perspectives on factors driving the consumption of animal- and plant-based protein sources into a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD), visualiing factors and their cause-and-effect relationships. Three Group Model Building sessions with 28 stakeholders (consumers, researchers, industry representatives, policymakers, interest group members) from the Netherlands informed the CLD. The Action Scales Model was used to categorize factors into system levels (events, structures, goals, and beliefs), providing insights into their potential for systemic change. The resulting CLD reveals the complexity of protein consumption across five interconnected subsystems: 1) Individual Aspects, 2) Social Interactions & Culture, 3) Physical Food Environment, 4) Food Industry & Natural Food Environment, and 5) Politics & Regulation. The high interconnectivity indicates isolated interventions are unlikely to be sufficient for systemic change, as feedback mechanisms may counteract or neutralize their effects. Addressing multiple elements across the system is thus essential to accelerate the protein transition. This study provides a foundation for understanding the system dynamics shaping consumption of animal- and plant-based protein sources. However, further research is needed to incorporate quantitative weighting, determine the relative importance of mechanisms and identify leverage points for systemic change to guide policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108487
Miranda Smith, Maryam Aghayan, Jonathan Little, Jerilynn C Prior, Tamara R Cohen, Zöe Soon, Hephzibah Bomide, Sarah Purcell
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases\" [Appetite 216 (2026) 108314].","authors":"Miranda Smith, Maryam Aghayan, Jonathan Little, Jerilynn C Prior, Tamara R Cohen, Zöe Soon, Hephzibah Bomide, Sarah Purcell","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2026.108487","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108487"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108485
Thomas Sire, Jany St-Cyr, Élise Carbonneau, Noémie Carbonneau
Unhealthy eating behaviors and body dissatisfaction are prevalent in Western societies, underscoring the importance of identifying adaptive eating patterns that support diet quality and well-being. This study examined how intuitive eating and motivation to regulate eating behaviors combine into distinct profiles, and how these profiles relate to diet quality, eating behaviors, and body image. A sample of 408 French-speaking adults from Québec, Canada (65.20 % women; M age = 46.93 years) completed an online questionnaire. Using the four dimensions of intuitive eating (i.e., unconditional permission to eat, eating for physical rather than emotional reasons, reliance on hunger and satiety cues, body-food choice congruence) and amotivation, controlled, and autonomous motivations to regulate eating behaviors as indicators, four profiles emerged from latent profile analysis: Autonomous Intuitive Eaters (15 % of the sample), Moderately Intuitive Eaters (31 %), Mixed-Motivation Unattuned Eaters (11 %), and Disengaged Eaters (44 %). Men, individuals with lower education, lower income, and higher body mass index were more likely to be Disengaged Eaters. Comparisons across profiles showed that Autonomous Intuitive Eaters reported the most favorable pattern (greater diet quality and body esteem, fewer problematic eating behaviors), while Moderately Intuitive Eaters reported similar but less pronounced outcomes. Mixed-Motivation Unattuned Eaters achieved high diet quality but reported poorer body esteem and more problematic eating behaviors, whereas Disengaged Eaters showed the lowest diet quality and least favorable psychological outcomes. Findings highlight the interplay between intuitive eating and motivation, suggesting that fostering adaptive combinations of both may promote healthier dietary patterns and positive relationships with food.
{"title":"Latent profile analyses of intuitive eating and motivation to regulate eating behaviors: Associations with diet quality, eating behaviors, and body image.","authors":"Thomas Sire, Jany St-Cyr, Élise Carbonneau, Noémie Carbonneau","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108485","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108485","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unhealthy eating behaviors and body dissatisfaction are prevalent in Western societies, underscoring the importance of identifying adaptive eating patterns that support diet quality and well-being. This study examined how intuitive eating and motivation to regulate eating behaviors combine into distinct profiles, and how these profiles relate to diet quality, eating behaviors, and body image. A sample of 408 French-speaking adults from Québec, Canada (65.20 % women; M age = 46.93 years) completed an online questionnaire. Using the four dimensions of intuitive eating (i.e., unconditional permission to eat, eating for physical rather than emotional reasons, reliance on hunger and satiety cues, body-food choice congruence) and amotivation, controlled, and autonomous motivations to regulate eating behaviors as indicators, four profiles emerged from latent profile analysis: Autonomous Intuitive Eaters (15 % of the sample), Moderately Intuitive Eaters (31 %), Mixed-Motivation Unattuned Eaters (11 %), and Disengaged Eaters (44 %). Men, individuals with lower education, lower income, and higher body mass index were more likely to be Disengaged Eaters. Comparisons across profiles showed that Autonomous Intuitive Eaters reported the most favorable pattern (greater diet quality and body esteem, fewer problematic eating behaviors), while Moderately Intuitive Eaters reported similar but less pronounced outcomes. Mixed-Motivation Unattuned Eaters achieved high diet quality but reported poorer body esteem and more problematic eating behaviors, whereas Disengaged Eaters showed the lowest diet quality and least favorable psychological outcomes. Findings highlight the interplay between intuitive eating and motivation, suggesting that fostering adaptive combinations of both may promote healthier dietary patterns and positive relationships with food.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108471
Binshuo Hu , Cheng Chang , Xin Song , Zhihui Wang , Xiaoshun Wang , Xiaowen Ding , Hong Yu , Li Guan , Dongsheng Niu , Jue Li , Rui Guan , Tenglong Yan
Background
Dietary diversity is an important indicator of diet quality and nutritional adequacy. Long working hours may influence dietary behaviors, while previous evidences were limited, especially among new forms of employment workers. This study aimed to investigate the associations between long working hours and insufficient dietary diversity among online ride-hailing drivers in Beijing, China.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 668 ride-hailing drivers in Beijing from August to October 2024. Weekly working hours were categorized as ≤ 55 h/wk and >55 h/wk. Dietary intake was assessed using a 24-h dietary recall. And the Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) was calculated based on the consumption of nine food groups, while DDS <5 was defined as insufficient dietary diversity. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) models and logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between weekly working hours and insufficient DDS. Additionally, subgroup analysis was further used to identify high-risk groups.
Results
77.8 % of participants worked more than 55 h/wk and 28.3 % of participants had insufficient dietary diversity. Less than 30 % of participants consumed dairy products, legumes, and fish. Participants working >55 h/wk had a significantly higher risk of insufficient DDS (adjusted OR: 2.29, 95 % CI: 1.38–3.79). Subgroup analysis indicated a stronger association among participants with socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds and unhealthy lifestyle factors.
Conclusion
Long working hours increased the risk of low dietary diversity among ride-hailing drivers, especially in socioeconomically and behaviorally vulnerable subgroups. These findings highlight the need for targeted nutritional and occupational health interventions in this high-risk population.
{"title":"Long working hours increase the risk of insufficient dietary diversity: Findings among online ride-hailing drivers","authors":"Binshuo Hu , Cheng Chang , Xin Song , Zhihui Wang , Xiaoshun Wang , Xiaowen Ding , Hong Yu , Li Guan , Dongsheng Niu , Jue Li , Rui Guan , Tenglong Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108471","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108471","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dietary diversity is an important indicator of diet quality and nutritional adequacy. Long working hours may influence dietary behaviors, while previous evidences were limited, especially among new forms of employment workers. This study aimed to investigate the associations between long working hours and insufficient dietary diversity among online ride-hailing drivers in Beijing, China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 668 ride-hailing drivers in Beijing from August to October 2024. Weekly working hours were categorized as ≤ 55 h/wk and >55 h/wk. Dietary intake was assessed using a 24-h dietary recall. And the Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) was calculated based on the consumption of nine food groups, while DDS <5 was defined as insufficient dietary diversity. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) models and logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between weekly working hours and insufficient DDS. Additionally, subgroup analysis was further used to identify high-risk groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>77.8 % of participants worked more than 55 h/wk and 28.3 % of participants had insufficient dietary diversity. Less than 30 % of participants consumed dairy products, legumes, and fish. Participants working >55 h/wk had a significantly higher risk of insufficient DDS (adjusted <em>OR</em>: 2.29, 95 % <em>CI</em>: 1.38–3.79). Subgroup analysis indicated a stronger association among participants with socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds and unhealthy lifestyle factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Long working hours increased the risk of low dietary diversity among ride-hailing drivers, especially in socioeconomically and behaviorally vulnerable subgroups. These findings highlight the need for targeted nutritional and occupational health interventions in this high-risk population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-24DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108482
Liam R Chawner
Despite vegetables being commonly served at UK mealtimes, children's consumption remains insufficient. Because portion sizes provided by parents predict children's intake, understanding how parents decide on vegetable portions during meals is critical but underexplored. This study examined whether meal context and food combinations influence parent portion size decisions. In a novel online portion size task, 407 parents (203 female) of 4-8-year-old children selected portions of protein, carbohydrate, and vegetable items across nine meal combinations. Parents then anticipated how much food their child would leave after each meal. Meal factors (food items), child factors (food liking, familiarity, anticipated leftovers, eating traits, gender) and parental factors (mealtime goals and feeding practices) were explored as predictors of parent vegetable portion sizes and anticipated child vegetable leftovers. Smaller vegetable portions were associated with lower perceived child vegetable liking, greater anticipated vegetable leftovers, and parental goals to avoid mealtime stress, whereas goals to serve healthy foods predicted larger portions. Meal combinations had a stronger effect on anticipated vegetable leftovers than on portion sizes. Parents expected more vegetable leftovers when non-vegetable items were highly liked or anticipated to be leftover, while higher vegetable liking and familiarity predicted fewer leftovers. These findings suggest that parents base vegetable portion sizes primarily on expectations about individual foods rather than the overall meal. However, when anticipating leftovers, parents appear to consider the influence of more palatable, non-vegetable items on their child's vegetable intake. Understanding these decision-making processes may inform strategies to support parents in serving appropriate vegetable portions and encouraging their intake.
{"title":"Parent served vegetable portion sizes and perception of food leftovers across different meal combinations: A cross sectional, online study.","authors":"Liam R Chawner","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108482","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite vegetables being commonly served at UK mealtimes, children's consumption remains insufficient. Because portion sizes provided by parents predict children's intake, understanding how parents decide on vegetable portions during meals is critical but underexplored. This study examined whether meal context and food combinations influence parent portion size decisions. In a novel online portion size task, 407 parents (203 female) of 4-8-year-old children selected portions of protein, carbohydrate, and vegetable items across nine meal combinations. Parents then anticipated how much food their child would leave after each meal. Meal factors (food items), child factors (food liking, familiarity, anticipated leftovers, eating traits, gender) and parental factors (mealtime goals and feeding practices) were explored as predictors of parent vegetable portion sizes and anticipated child vegetable leftovers. Smaller vegetable portions were associated with lower perceived child vegetable liking, greater anticipated vegetable leftovers, and parental goals to avoid mealtime stress, whereas goals to serve healthy foods predicted larger portions. Meal combinations had a stronger effect on anticipated vegetable leftovers than on portion sizes. Parents expected more vegetable leftovers when non-vegetable items were highly liked or anticipated to be leftover, while higher vegetable liking and familiarity predicted fewer leftovers. These findings suggest that parents base vegetable portion sizes primarily on expectations about individual foods rather than the overall meal. However, when anticipating leftovers, parents appear to consider the influence of more palatable, non-vegetable items on their child's vegetable intake. Understanding these decision-making processes may inform strategies to support parents in serving appropriate vegetable portions and encouraging their intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146045949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108468
Nora Chaaban, MoezAlIslam Faris, Derek V Byrne, Barbara Vad Andersen
While extensive research has examined factors influencing dietary behavior change, relatively little is known about what supports individuals in successfully maintaining such changes. Ramadan fasting (RF) provides a unique context to explore both context-specific and transferable factors underlying successful short-term dietary behavior change, as many individuals are expected to complete the full one-month fasting period. The current qualitative study aimed to identify the primary and secondary drivers of successful short-term dietary behavior change by examining the subjectively experienced motivations, barriers, and coping strategies among adults engaging in RF. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 adults at three time points: before, during, and at the end of Ramadan. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and interpreted through the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model. Six overarching themes emerged: (1) Religion and Spirituality, (2) Social-Structural-Related Factors, (3) Physical and Mental Sensations, (4) Capability, (5) Food-Related Factors, and (6) Health and Weight Management. Findings revealed that adherence was primarily driven by religious obligation, spiritual meaning, and collective participation, factors unique to the Ramadan context, while capability, social support, self-regulation, and habit formation emerged as secondary, transferable drivers that supported maintenance and may extend to other dietary contexts. Successful behavior change resulted from the dynamic interaction of motivation, opportunity, and capability. These findings suggest that interventions aiming to promote sustained dietary change may benefit from aligning behavioral goals with individuals' core values, fostering social reinforcement, and supporting habit development through repeated practice.
{"title":"Drivers and barriers of successful short-term dietary behavior change: Transferable factors from a qualitative case study of Ramadan fasting.","authors":"Nora Chaaban, MoezAlIslam Faris, Derek V Byrne, Barbara Vad Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108468","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While extensive research has examined factors influencing dietary behavior change, relatively little is known about what supports individuals in successfully maintaining such changes. Ramadan fasting (RF) provides a unique context to explore both context-specific and transferable factors underlying successful short-term dietary behavior change, as many individuals are expected to complete the full one-month fasting period. The current qualitative study aimed to identify the primary and secondary drivers of successful short-term dietary behavior change by examining the subjectively experienced motivations, barriers, and coping strategies among adults engaging in RF. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 adults at three time points: before, during, and at the end of Ramadan. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and interpreted through the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model. Six overarching themes emerged: (1) Religion and Spirituality, (2) Social-Structural-Related Factors, (3) Physical and Mental Sensations, (4) Capability, (5) Food-Related Factors, and (6) Health and Weight Management. Findings revealed that adherence was primarily driven by religious obligation, spiritual meaning, and collective participation, factors unique to the Ramadan context, while capability, social support, self-regulation, and habit formation emerged as secondary, transferable drivers that supported maintenance and may extend to other dietary contexts. Successful behavior change resulted from the dynamic interaction of motivation, opportunity, and capability. These findings suggest that interventions aiming to promote sustained dietary change may benefit from aligning behavioral goals with individuals' core values, fostering social reinforcement, and supporting habit development through repeated practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108468"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146045942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2026.108466
Cara F. Ruggiero, Laura Kudlek, Julia Mueller, Simon J. Griffin, Stephen J. Sharp, Nick J. Wareham, Soren Brage, Nita G. Forouhi, Ken K. Ong, Amy Ahern
Eating behaviour traits (EBTs), individuals’ reactions to food, food-related cues, and food intake, play an important role in the development and maintenance of overweight and obesity. We provide population-based norms for cognitive restraint, uncontrolled eating, and emotional eating as measured by the Three Factor Eating questionnaire (short form, TFEQ-18) in a UK cohort of middle-aged adults (the Fenland Study). Participants included 7830 individuals recruited across Cambridgeshire General Practices; 51.8 % identified as female and participants reported a mean BMI of 26.8. Unadjusted linear regression estimated demographic (sex, age) and anthropometric (Body Mass Index, BMI) associations with each EBT to identify subgroups to derive normative scores. Percentiles of each EBT were calculated for the overall population and subgroups. Males scored lower than females on cognitive restraint (β = −7.86, 95 % CI [-8.69, −7.03], p < 0.001), uncontrolled eating (β = −1.03, 95 % CI [-1.80, −0.26], p = 0.008), and emotional eating (β = −13.13, 95 % CI [-14.28, −11.98], p < 0.001). Older age was associated with higher scores on cognitive restraint (β = 0.13, 95 % CI [0.07, 0.19], p < 0.001), and lower scores on uncontrolled eating (β = −0.34, 95 % CI [-0.39, −0.28], p < 0.001) and emotional eating (β = −0.13, 95 % CI [-0.21, −0.04], p = 0.002). Higher BMI was associated with higher emotional eating (β = 1.71, 95 % CI [1.59, 1.83], p < 0.001) and uncontrolled eating (β = 1.05, 95 % CI [0.97, 1.12], p < 0.001). BMI was not associated with cognitive restraint. Normative scores provide context for individual EBT scores and may inform development, refinement, and application of prevention strategies for overweight, obesity, and eating disorders.
饮食行为特征(ebt),即个体对食物的反应、食物相关线索和食物摄入,在超重和肥胖的发展和维持中发挥着重要作用。我们通过三因素饮食问卷(简称TFEQ-18)在英国中年人队列(芬兰研究)中提供了基于人群的认知约束、不受控制的饮食和情绪性饮食的标准。参与者包括从剑桥郡全科医院招募的7830名个体;51.8%为女性,参与者报告的平均BMI为26.8。未经调整的线性回归估计了人口统计学(性别、年龄)和人体测量学(身体质量指数,BMI)与每个EBT的关联,以确定亚组,得出规范分数。计算总体和亚组的每个EBT的百分位数。男性在认知约束(β = - 7.86, 95% CI [-8.69, - 7.03], p < 0.001)、进食失控(β = - 1.03, 95% CI [-1.80, - 0.26], p = 0.008)和情绪化进食(β = - 13.13, 95% CI [-14.28, - 11.98], p < 0.001)方面得分低于女性。年龄越大,认知约束得分越高(β = 0.13, 95% CI [0.07, 0.19], p < 0.001),不受控制的进食得分越低(β = - 0.34, 95% CI [-0.39, - 0.28], p < 0.001),情绪性进食得分越低(β = - 0.13, 95% CI [-0.21, - 0.04], p = 0.002)。较高的BMI与较高的情绪化饮食(β = 1.71, 95% CI [1.59, 1.83], p < 0.001)和不受控制的饮食(β = 1.05, 95% CI [0.97, 1.12], p < 0.001)相关。BMI与认知约束无关。标准分数为个人EBT分数提供了背景,并可能为超重、肥胖和饮食失调的预防策略的发展、改进和应用提供信息。
{"title":"Normative scores for the three factor eating questionnaire (TFEQ-R18) in a UK population-based cohort","authors":"Cara F. Ruggiero, Laura Kudlek, Julia Mueller, Simon J. Griffin, Stephen J. Sharp, Nick J. Wareham, Soren Brage, Nita G. Forouhi, Ken K. Ong, Amy Ahern","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108466","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108466","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Eating behaviour traits (EBTs), individuals’ reactions to food, food-related cues, and food intake, play an important role in the development and maintenance of overweight and obesity. We provide population-based norms for cognitive restraint, uncontrolled eating, and emotional eating as measured by the Three Factor Eating questionnaire (short form, TFEQ-18) in a UK cohort of middle-aged adults (the Fenland Study). Participants included 7830 individuals recruited across Cambridgeshire General Practices; 51.8 % identified as female and participants reported a mean BMI of 26.8. Unadjusted linear regression estimated demographic (sex, age) and anthropometric (Body Mass Index, BMI) associations with each EBT to identify subgroups to derive normative scores. Percentiles of each EBT were calculated for the overall population and subgroups. Males scored lower than females on cognitive restraint (β = −7.86, 95 % CI [-8.69, −7.03], p < 0.001), uncontrolled eating (β = −1.03, 95 % CI [-1.80, −0.26], p = 0.008), and emotional eating (β = −13.13, 95 % CI [-14.28, −11.98], p < 0.001). Older age was associated with higher scores on cognitive restraint (β = 0.13, 95 % CI [0.07, 0.19], p < 0.001), and lower scores on uncontrolled eating (β = −0.34, 95 % CI [-0.39, −0.28], p < 0.001) and emotional eating (β = −0.13, 95 % CI [-0.21, −0.04], p = 0.002). Higher BMI was associated with higher emotional eating (β = 1.71, 95 % CI [1.59, 1.83], p < 0.001) and uncontrolled eating (β = 1.05, 95 % CI [0.97, 1.12], p < 0.001). BMI was not associated with cognitive restraint. Normative scores provide context for individual EBT scores and may inform development, refinement, and application of prevention strategies for overweight, obesity, and eating disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146036584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}