Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108427
Anna C. Rauen , Andrea H. Meyer , Felicitas Forrer , Verena M. Müller , Simone Munsch
A significant number of youths experience loss of control eating (LOC), characterized by a sense of losing control over eating, regardless of food amount. Binge eating, a common LOC variant, involves consuming large amounts of food in a short period, often accompanied by distress. Previous research suggests that interpersonal and appearance-based rejection sensitivity (RS), the tendency to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and overreact to rejection, may contribute to the development and persistence of LOC variants. This study examined whether baseline levels of interpersonal and appearance-based RS are associated with LOC variants one year later in a youth sample aged 14–24 and enriched for LOC and binge eating by virtue of recruitment strategies. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression models indicate that both interpersonal and appearance-based RS were associated with the occurrence of self-reported monthly binge eating episodes one year later, but not with the frequency of binge eating episodes. The findings highlight RS as a potential influencing factor for the development and maintenance of LOC variants, even in the absence of severe body dissatisfaction or mood disturbances. Early interventions targeting emotional responses to perceived rejection, particularly appearance-related, may help prevent or reduce LOC behaviors during adolescence and emerging adulthood.
{"title":"The role of appearance-based and interpersonal rejection sensitivity in youth loss of control eating: A one-year longitudinal study","authors":"Anna C. Rauen , Andrea H. Meyer , Felicitas Forrer , Verena M. Müller , Simone Munsch","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108427","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108427","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A significant number of youths experience loss of control eating (LOC), characterized by a sense of losing control over eating, regardless of food amount. Binge eating, a common LOC variant, involves consuming large amounts of food in a short period, often accompanied by distress. Previous research suggests that interpersonal and appearance-based rejection sensitivity (RS), the tendency to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and overreact to rejection, may contribute to the development and persistence of LOC variants. This study examined whether baseline levels of interpersonal and appearance-based RS are associated with LOC variants one year later in a youth sample aged 14–24 and enriched for LOC and binge eating by virtue of recruitment strategies. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression models indicate that both interpersonal and appearance-based RS were associated with the occurrence of self-reported monthly binge eating episodes one year later, but not with the frequency of binge eating episodes. The findings highlight RS as a potential influencing factor for the development and maintenance of LOC variants, even in the absence of severe body dissatisfaction or mood disturbances. Early interventions targeting emotional responses to perceived rejection, particularly appearance-related, may help prevent or reduce LOC behaviors during adolescence and emerging adulthood.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108426
Julia Q. Shen , Jonas House , Bob C. Mulder , Sigrid Wertheim-Heck
Biodiversity, crucial for resilient agri-food systems, is declining at an unprecedented rate, partly due to changing food systems. Lack of consumer willingness has been identified as a barrier to adopt biodiversity-friendly agricultural practices, however, a consumer perspective remains underexplored. This paper presents findings from four focus group discussions in the Netherlands with a relatively environmentally-conscious sample (N = 24), exploring how they perceive biodiversity-friendly production and consumption. These discussions reveal two main insights: first, participants are aware of the negative ecological impacts of food systems and can identify key drivers of biodiversity loss, such as increased chemical inputs, monocultures and unsustainable consumption patterns. They recognize the systemic nature of these problems, describing the system as ‘locked in’ by economic and institutional constraints. Second, while participants stress the role of consumers in driving food systems (change), they simultaneously express ambivalence around their own agency to do so. Mapped according to the COM-B model, the study identifies drivers and barriers related to people's perceived capability (e.g., limited visibility of biodiversity), opportunity (e.g., limited availability and accessibility of alternatives), and motivation (e.g., conflicting priorities) to consume in a more biodiversity-friendly way. We argue that this tension between responsibility and agency reflects a broader discourse of consumer responsibilization, in which individuals are assigned responsibility for solving broader problems through their consumption, without being given the means to. The study demonstrates the need for systems that enable biodiversity-friendly food consumption, as well as foster a more balanced societal discourse on responsibility and agency in food systems.
{"title":"“I care but it doesn't keep me up at night”: A qualitative exploration of perceptions of biodiversity-friendly food consumption","authors":"Julia Q. Shen , Jonas House , Bob C. Mulder , Sigrid Wertheim-Heck","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108426","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108426","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biodiversity, crucial for resilient agri-food systems, is declining at an unprecedented rate, partly due to changing food systems. Lack of consumer willingness has been identified as a barrier to adopt biodiversity-friendly agricultural practices, however, a consumer perspective remains underexplored. This paper presents findings from four focus group discussions in the Netherlands with a relatively environmentally-conscious sample (N = 24), exploring how they perceive biodiversity-friendly production and consumption. These discussions reveal two main insights: first, participants are aware of the negative ecological impacts of food systems and can identify key drivers of biodiversity loss, such as increased chemical inputs, monocultures and unsustainable consumption patterns. They recognize the systemic nature of these problems, describing the system as ‘locked in’ by economic and institutional constraints. Second, while participants stress the role of consumers in driving food systems (change), they simultaneously express ambivalence around their own agency to do so. Mapped according to the COM-B model, the study identifies drivers and barriers related to people's perceived capability (e.g., limited visibility of biodiversity), opportunity (e.g., limited availability and accessibility of alternatives), and motivation (e.g., conflicting priorities) to consume in a more biodiversity-friendly way. We argue that this tension between responsibility and agency reflects a broader discourse of consumer responsibilization, in which individuals are assigned responsibility for solving broader problems through their consumption, without being given the means to. The study demonstrates the need for systems that enable biodiversity-friendly food consumption, as well as foster a more balanced societal discourse on responsibility and agency in food systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108426"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145773147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108424
Amy Finlay , Yuru Huang , Jean Adams , Andrew Jones , Rebecca Evans , Eric Robinson
Greater consumption of food prepared out of the home (OOH) is associated with higher energy intake. Strategies are needed to make eating OOH food less harmful to health. Identifying menu characteristics associated with higher energy consumption could aid characterisation of OOH outlets by their relative healthiness and inform future policy intervention in the OOH food sector. This study aimed to identify whether outlet healthiness rating tools and food menu characteristics can explain variance in energy consumed during OOH food eating occasions. Customers (N = 3718) were asked to recall their food orders upon exiting a range of OOH outlets across four local authorities in England during 2021 and 2022. For each outlet, universal health rating scores were calculated based on select menu characteristics and deep learning healthiness scores were calculated based on outlet name. Random forest models and robust linear regression models clustered by outlet were used to identify whether outlet healthiness scores and individual menu characteristics were associated with kcal consumed. Energy consumed during OOH outlet visits was negatively associated with universal health rating scores (−28.3; 95 % CI -44.8 to −11.8; p = .003) but not associated with deep learning scores. Menu characteristics with the greatest importance and therefore contributing the most to predictive accuracy for energy consumed were the percent of savoury main menu items over 600 kcal and 1345 kcal, the number of desserts, the number of unique vegetables, and the percent of drinks over 100 kcal. Menu characteristics accounted for 29% of variance in energy consumed by customers. Universal health rating scores may be a useful tool to characterise the healthiness of OOH outlets in England. Investigating the potential impact of OOH outlet health ratings on consumer and business behaviour is warranted.
在家外准备的食物消耗越多,能量摄入就越高。我们需要一些策略来降低户外食品对健康的危害。确定与高能耗户外餐厅相关的菜单特征,可以通过户外餐厅的相对健康状况来帮助描述其特征,并为未来户外食品行业的政策干预提供信息。本研究旨在确定餐厅健康评级工具和食物菜单特征是否可以解释户外食品消费场合的能量消耗差异。在2021年和2022年期间,顾客(N=3718)被要求在离开英格兰四个地方当局的一系列户外媒体店时召回他们订购的食物。对于每个门店,根据选择菜单特征计算普遍健康评级得分,并根据门店名称计算深度学习健康得分。使用随机森林模型和按出口聚类的鲁棒线性回归模型来确定出口健康评分和个人菜单特征是否与卡路里消耗相关。户外媒体访问期间消耗的能量与全民健康评分呈负相关(-28.3;95% CI -44.8至-11.8;p= 0.003),但与深度学习评分无关。菜单特征最重要,因此对能量消耗的预测准确性贡献最大的是超过600kcal和1345kcal的开胃主菜的百分比,甜点的数量,独特蔬菜的数量,以及超过100kcal的饮料的百分比。菜单特征占顾客能量消耗变化的29%。全民健康评级分数可能是一个有用的工具,以表征健康的户外媒体网点在英国。调查户外媒体健康评级对消费者和商业行为的潜在影响是有必要的。
{"title":"Associations between out of home food sector outlet menu healthiness scores, menu characteristics and energy consumed by customers in England during 2021–2022","authors":"Amy Finlay , Yuru Huang , Jean Adams , Andrew Jones , Rebecca Evans , Eric Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108424","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108424","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Greater consumption of food prepared out of the home (OOH) is associated with higher energy intake. Strategies are needed to make eating OOH food less harmful to health. Identifying menu characteristics associated with higher energy consumption could aid characterisation of OOH outlets by their relative healthiness and inform future policy intervention in the OOH food sector. This study aimed to identify whether outlet healthiness rating tools and food menu characteristics can explain variance in energy consumed during OOH food eating occasions. Customers (N = 3718) were asked to recall their food orders upon exiting a range of OOH outlets across four local authorities in England during 2021 and 2022. For each outlet, universal health rating scores were calculated based on select menu characteristics and deep learning healthiness scores were calculated based on outlet name. Random forest models and robust linear regression models clustered by outlet were used to identify whether outlet healthiness scores and individual menu characteristics were associated with kcal consumed. Energy consumed during OOH outlet visits was negatively associated with universal health rating scores (−28.3; 95 % CI -44.8 to −11.8; p = .003) but not associated with deep learning scores. Menu characteristics with the greatest importance and therefore contributing the most to predictive accuracy for energy consumed were the percent of savoury main menu items over 600 kcal and 1345 kcal, the number of desserts, the number of unique vegetables, and the percent of drinks over 100 kcal. Menu characteristics accounted for 29% of variance in energy consumed by customers. Universal health rating scores may be a useful tool to characterise the healthiness of OOH outlets in England. Investigating the potential impact of OOH outlet health ratings on consumer and business behaviour is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145773073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108416
Eram Albajri , Hasan Ayaz , Patricia A. Shewokis , Angelo Del Parigi , Sinclair A. Smith , Jennifer J. Quinlan , Jennifer A. Nasser
Objective
To investigate how shifting the attention away from food being eaten (by women who are cognitively restrained) toward another food-related stimulus affects food intake and relative increases in neural activity from baseline (as relative changes in oxygenated hemoglobin, HbO) within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC).
Methods
Participants were divided into 2 groups of 23 subjects based on a median split of TFEQ-R score: cognitively restrained (CR) or non-cognitively restrained (NCR). Relative change from baseline in mPFC activity was measured using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during ad libitum consumption of a preferred high fat/high sugar food over a 3- to10-min period while participants viewed food advertisement (FV) or nature scene (NV) videos.
Results
After controlling for covariates, including body mass index and FV eating duration, we found that group-by-condition interaction was significantly able to predict grams of food consumed (P = 0.031). In the CR group, food intake positively correlated with mPFC HbO under both video conditions (P < 0. 05). The increase in mPFC HbO from baseline under both conditions was higher in CR subjects (P = 0.035, 95 % CI: 0.04, 1.20).
Conclusions
Exposure to a palatable food advertisement video elicited different behavioral and neural responses between CR and NCR groups. While food intake did not increase in the CR group under FV, their mPFC activity was positively correlated with intake. These findings suggest that maintaining restraint under hedonic distraction may require greater cognitive effort. Future studies should explore longer-term effects on self-regulation.
{"title":"Manipulating attention during eating effects food intake and medial prefrontal cortex fNIRS response in women with cognitive restraint","authors":"Eram Albajri , Hasan Ayaz , Patricia A. Shewokis , Angelo Del Parigi , Sinclair A. Smith , Jennifer J. Quinlan , Jennifer A. Nasser","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108416","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108416","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate how shifting the attention away from food being eaten (by women who are cognitively restrained) toward another food-related stimulus affects food intake and relative increases in neural activity from baseline (as relative changes in oxygenated hemoglobin, HbO) within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were divided into 2 groups of 23 subjects based on a median split of TFEQ-R score: cognitively restrained (CR) or non-cognitively restrained (NCR). Relative change from baseline in mPFC activity was measured using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during ad libitum consumption of a preferred high fat/high sugar food over a 3- to10-min period while participants viewed food advertisement (FV) or nature scene (NV) videos.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After controlling for covariates, including body mass index and FV eating duration, we found that group-by-condition interaction was significantly able to predict grams of food consumed (<em>P</em> = 0.031). In the CR group, food intake positively correlated with mPFC HbO under both video conditions (<em>P</em> < 0. 05). The increase in mPFC HbO from baseline under both conditions was higher in CR subjects (<em>P</em> = 0.035, <em>95 % CI</em>: 0.04, 1.20).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Exposure to a palatable food advertisement video elicited different behavioral and neural responses between CR and NCR groups. While food intake did not increase in the CR group under FV, their mPFC activity was positively correlated with intake. These findings suggest that maintaining restraint under hedonic distraction may require greater cognitive effort. Future studies should explore longer-term effects on self-regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145773131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108420
Mengying Liu , Jingyi Jiang , Jianping Huang , Xiaoang Wan
Time pressure influences decision-making across domains, but its effects on multi-attribute dietary decision and potential gender differences remain unclear. Using an incentive-compatible paradigm, we investigated how time pressure might modulate the cognitive mechanisms of food choices in men and women. Participants made binary choices between health-taste tradeoffs under time-pressure and no-time-pressure conditions. Behavioral results revealed that time pressure altered choice patterns across genders, with no gender differences in response times or healthier choices under both time conditions. Hierarchical drift-diffusion modeling (HDDM) revealed three key mechanisms. First, male participants shifted from deliberative health-taste integration to hedonic-dominant processing under time pressure, whereas female participants maintained stable taste-focused strategies. Second, both genders showed reduced decision thresholds under time constraints, requiring less evidence for choices. Third, time pressure eliminated baseline gender differences in perceptual-motor speed. Collectively, these findings indicated that temporal constraints may restructure dietary decision-making through both gender-specific strategies and shared adaptive responses, offering insights for designing personalized choice environments to promote healthier eating.
{"title":"Gender differences in multi-attribute dietary decision making under time pressure: A hierarchical drift-diffusion approach","authors":"Mengying Liu , Jingyi Jiang , Jianping Huang , Xiaoang Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108420","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108420","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Time pressure influences decision-making across domains, but its effects on multi-attribute dietary decision and potential gender differences remain unclear. Using an incentive-compatible paradigm, we investigated how time pressure might modulate the cognitive mechanisms of food choices in men and women. Participants made binary choices between health-taste tradeoffs under time-pressure and no-time-pressure conditions. Behavioral results revealed that time pressure altered choice patterns across genders, with no gender differences in response times or healthier choices under both time conditions. Hierarchical drift-diffusion modeling (HDDM) revealed three key mechanisms. First, male participants shifted from deliberative health-taste integration to hedonic-dominant processing under time pressure, whereas female participants maintained stable taste-focused strategies. Second, both genders showed reduced decision thresholds under time constraints, requiring less evidence for choices. Third, time pressure eliminated baseline gender differences in perceptual-motor speed. Collectively, these findings indicated that temporal constraints may restructure dietary decision-making through both gender-specific strategies and shared adaptive responses, offering insights for designing personalized choice environments to promote healthier eating.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145754933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108421
Riley J. Jouppi , Colin E. Vize , Christine C. Call , Rebecca L. Emery Tavernier , Lydia B. Brown , Rachel P. Kolko Conlon , Jennifer L. Grace , Gina M. Sweeney , Michele D. Levine
The Pregnancy Eating Attitudes-Questionnaire (PEA-Q) assesses pregnancy-specific eating/weight attitudes that impact birthing individuals. This novel self-report measure, comprising Permissive Eating/Weight Attitudes, Intentional Eating Changes, and Lack of Worry about Eating/Weight factors, demonstrated promising psychometric properties when administered late in pregnancy. To evaluate the PEA-Q's ability to adequately capture pregnancy-specific eating/weight attitudes across pregnancy, we employed longitudinal measurement invariance (MI) testing among a community sample of pregnant individuals with pre-pregnancy body mass index≥25. Participants (N = 312) enrolled in a randomized perinatal health behavior trial completed the PEA-Q at M(SD) = 13.6(2.7) and 36.5(1.3) weeks' gestation. We performed longitudinal MI testing in steps to establish equivalence of the PEA-Q at early and late pregnancy and to compare PEA-Q scores between these timepoints. Models covaried for randomization status. Partial strong invariance was ultimately achieved by freeing the intercepts of one item. Results from latent mean difference testing documented significantly lower scores on Permissive Eating/Weight Attitudes and Lack of Worry about Eating/Weight (p ≤ .01), but not Intentional Eating Changes (p = .08), in early versus late pregnancy. Findings indicate that the PEA-Q adequately captures pregnancy-specific eating/weight attitudes in both early and late pregnancy and, thus, can be used to assess change over this period. In the present sample, changes in PEA-Q scores from early to late pregnancy suggest that pregnant individuals may experience increasingly permissive eating/weight attitudes and less worry about eating/weight as pregnancy progresses. Future research examining the health implications of PEA-Q changes across pregnancy is warranted.
{"title":"Pregnancy Eating Attitudes-Questionnaire (PEA-Q): Longitudinal measurement invariance from early to late pregnancy in a community sample","authors":"Riley J. Jouppi , Colin E. Vize , Christine C. Call , Rebecca L. Emery Tavernier , Lydia B. Brown , Rachel P. Kolko Conlon , Jennifer L. Grace , Gina M. Sweeney , Michele D. Levine","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108421","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108421","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Pregnancy Eating Attitudes-Questionnaire (PEA-Q) assesses pregnancy-specific eating/weight attitudes that impact birthing individuals. This novel self-report measure, comprising Permissive Eating/Weight Attitudes, Intentional Eating Changes, and Lack of Worry about Eating/Weight factors, demonstrated promising psychometric properties when administered late in pregnancy. To evaluate the PEA-Q's ability to adequately capture pregnancy-specific eating/weight attitudes <em>across</em> pregnancy, we employed longitudinal measurement invariance (MI) testing among a community sample of pregnant individuals with pre-pregnancy body mass index≥25. Participants (<em>N</em> = 312) enrolled in a randomized perinatal health behavior trial completed the PEA-Q at <em>M</em>(<em>SD</em>) = 13.6(2.7) and 36.5(1.3) weeks' gestation. We performed longitudinal MI testing in steps to establish equivalence of the PEA-Q at early and late pregnancy and to compare PEA-Q scores between these timepoints. Models covaried for randomization status. Partial strong invariance was ultimately achieved by freeing the intercepts of one item. Results from latent mean difference testing documented significantly lower scores on Permissive Eating/Weight Attitudes and Lack of Worry about Eating/Weight (<em>p</em> ≤ .01), but not Intentional Eating Changes (<em>p</em> = .08), in early versus late pregnancy. Findings indicate that the PEA-Q adequately captures pregnancy-specific eating/weight attitudes in both early and late pregnancy and, thus, can be used to assess change over this period. In the present sample, changes in PEA-Q scores from early to late pregnancy suggest that pregnant individuals may experience increasingly permissive eating/weight attitudes and less worry about eating/weight as pregnancy progresses. Future research examining the health implications of PEA-Q changes across pregnancy is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145747567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108419
Urvashi Dixit , Wesley R. Barnhart , Rachel R. Henderson , Jorin D. Larsen , Emma G. Folk , Erica M. Ahlich
Perseverative cognition (e.g., worry, rumination) is cross-sectionally associated with disordered eating behaviors and negative affect; yet little research has examined its causal role in emotional eating (EE). The current preregistered experimental study tested the influence of one type of perseverative cognition—worry—on objectively measured food consumption in the laboratory. A total of 129 undergraduate students (67.4 % cisgender women, AgeM = 19.87) were screened via a semi-structured diagnostic interview and randomly assigned to either a worry induction or control condition. Following the manipulation, participants completed a bogus taste test with chocolate, potato chips, and crackers. They also completed self-report measures of emotion regulation, intolerance of uncertainty, disinhibition, and EE. Manipulation checks confirmed that participants in the worry condition experienced significantly higher post-induction worry relative to controls. Primary analyses revealed that participants in the worry condition consumed significantly more potato chips (p = .039, d = .32) and total food (p = .032, d = .33) compared to the control condition. No moderating effects of intolerance of uncertainty (IU), emotion dysregulation (ER), or disinhibition were observed. Moreover, neither a broad-based self-report measure of EE (p = .555) nor a specific measure of worry-related EE (p = .855) predicted the amount of food consumed or moderated the effect of condition. Findings provide novel experimental evidence that worry, as a specific form of perseverative cognition, can contribute to EE behavior. Targeting worry as a transdiagnostic mechanism may enhance the effectiveness of interventions for EE.
持续性认知(如担忧、沉思)与饮食紊乱行为和负面情绪横断面相关;然而,很少有研究调查它在情绪性进食(EE)中的因果作用。目前的预注册实验研究在实验室测试了一种持续性认知担忧对客观测量食物消耗的影响。通过半结构化诊断访谈筛选129名本科生(67.4%为顺性别女性,年龄em = 19.87),随机分为焦虑诱导组和对照组。在操作之后,参与者用巧克力、薯片和饼干完成了一个虚假的味觉测试。他们还完成了情绪调节、不确定性耐受性、去抑制和情感表达的自我报告测量。操作检查证实,焦虑状态的参与者在诱导后的焦虑程度明显高于对照组。初步分析显示,与对照组相比,焦虑状态下的参与者消耗的薯片(p = 0.039, d = 0.32)和总食物(p = 0.032, d = 0.33)明显更多。未观察到不确定性不耐受(IU)、情绪失调(ER)或去抑制的调节作用。此外,基础广泛的情感表达自我报告测量(p = .555)和特定的焦虑相关情感表达测量(p = .855)都不能预测食物消耗量或调节状态的影响。研究结果提供了新的实验证据,表明担忧作为一种特定形式的持续性认知,可以促进情感表达行为。将焦虑作为一种跨诊断机制可以提高情感表达干预的有效性。
{"title":"Worry wart: A preregistered, experimental investigation of worry-induced emotional eating and associated psychological characteristics","authors":"Urvashi Dixit , Wesley R. Barnhart , Rachel R. Henderson , Jorin D. Larsen , Emma G. Folk , Erica M. Ahlich","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108419","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108419","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Perseverative cognition (e.g., worry, rumination) is cross-sectionally associated with disordered eating behaviors and negative affect; yet little research has examined its causal role in emotional eating (EE). The current preregistered experimental study tested the influence of one type of perseverative cognition—worry—on objectively measured food consumption in the laboratory. A total of 129 undergraduate students (67.4 % cisgender women, Age<sub><em>M</em></sub> = 19.87) were screened via a semi-structured diagnostic interview and randomly assigned to either a worry induction or control condition. Following the manipulation, participants completed a bogus taste test with chocolate, potato chips, and crackers. They also completed self-report measures of emotion regulation, intolerance of uncertainty, disinhibition, and EE. Manipulation checks confirmed that participants in the worry condition experienced significantly higher post-induction worry relative to controls. Primary analyses revealed that participants in the worry condition consumed significantly more potato chips (<em>p</em> = .039, <em>d</em> = .32) and total food (<em>p</em> = .032, <em>d</em> = .33) compared to the control condition. No moderating effects of intolerance of uncertainty (IU), emotion dysregulation (ER), or disinhibition were observed. Moreover, neither a broad-based self-report measure of EE (<em>p</em> = .555) nor a specific measure of worry-related EE (<em>p</em> = .855) predicted the amount of food consumed or moderated the effect of condition. Findings provide novel experimental evidence that worry, as a specific form of perseverative cognition, can contribute to EE behavior. Targeting worry as a transdiagnostic mechanism may enhance the effectiveness of interventions for EE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108419"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145740322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108422
Patrycja Klimek-Johnson , Robin M. Masheb , Beth E. Cohen , Joy Huggins , Sarah E. Siegel , Jennifer Snow , Shira Maguen
Food insecurity is a well-established risk factor for disordered eating behaviors in non-veterans. Because United States (U.S.) veterans are vulnerable to both food insecurity and disordered eating, the present study aims to evaluate associations between food insecurity and binge eating, purging, dietary restraint/restriction, and night eating behaviors—commonly occurring disordered eating behaviors in U.S. veterans. A national sample of U.S. veterans completed an online survey (n = 405). General and generalized linear models evaluated associations between food insecurity (predictor variable) and disordered eating (outcome variables), adjusted for race, ethnicity, gender, age, education, and employment status. Compared with veterans with food security, food insecure veterans reported twice the number of binge eating episodes, almost four times the number of purging episodes, nearly a third more dietary restraint/restriction, and mildly-to-moderately worse night eating symptoms. Exploratory gender-stratified models suggested that the relationship between food insecurity and disordered eating behaviors, such as purging and night eating, may be stronger in veteran men than women. U.S. veterans with food insecurity demonstrate greater disordered eating, particularly night eating and purging behaviors, than those with food security. Gender differences suggest that disordered eating may function differently in men and women with food insecurity. The present study can inform screening and treatment of U.S. veterans with food insecurity and disordered eating, including the need to concurrently assess both issues. Given the cross-sectional design, future research is needed to clarify the temporal relationship between food insecurity and disordered eating in U.S. veterans and to elucidate similarities and differences by gender.
{"title":"Examining associations between food insecurity and disordered eating in U.S. veterans","authors":"Patrycja Klimek-Johnson , Robin M. Masheb , Beth E. Cohen , Joy Huggins , Sarah E. Siegel , Jennifer Snow , Shira Maguen","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108422","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108422","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food insecurity is a well-established risk factor for disordered eating behaviors in non-veterans. Because United States (U.S.) veterans are vulnerable to both food insecurity and disordered eating, the present study aims to evaluate associations between food insecurity and binge eating, purging, dietary restraint/restriction, and night eating behaviors—commonly occurring disordered eating behaviors in U.S. veterans. A national sample of U.S. veterans completed an online survey (<em>n</em> = 405). General and generalized linear models evaluated associations between food insecurity (predictor variable) and disordered eating (outcome variables), adjusted for race, ethnicity, gender, age, education, and employment status. Compared with veterans with food security, food insecure veterans reported twice the number of binge eating episodes, almost four times the number of purging episodes, nearly a third more dietary restraint/restriction, and mildly-to-moderately worse night eating symptoms. Exploratory gender-stratified models suggested that the relationship between food insecurity and disordered eating behaviors, such as purging and night eating, may be stronger in veteran men than women. U.S. veterans with food insecurity demonstrate greater disordered eating, particularly night eating and purging behaviors, than those with food security. Gender differences suggest that disordered eating may function differently in men and women with food insecurity. The present study can inform screening and treatment of U.S. veterans with food insecurity and disordered eating, including the need to concurrently assess both issues. Given the cross-sectional design, future research is needed to clarify the temporal relationship between food insecurity and disordered eating in U.S. veterans and to elucidate similarities and differences by gender.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108418
Verenice Ascencio Gutierrez , Kimberly F. Beede-James , Laura E. Martin , Kyle T. Zumpano , Kristen E. Kay , Kathryn F. Medler , Ann-Marie Torregrossa
Exposure to tannic acid- and quinine-containing diets upregulates subsets of salivary proteins (SPs), which in turn, results in increased acceptance of the “bitter” diet. However, it is unclear what aspects of the diet consumption influence SP upregulation. It has been thought that taste receptor activation is necessary for upregulation of SPs since sensory stimulation precedes changes in SPs, but no studies have confirmed the contribution of taste to SP upregulation.
To test this hypothesis, we used TRPM5 KO and TRPM4/5 DKO mice that have impaired bitter taste signaling. These mice are able to upregulate SPs in response to isoproterenol injections but not when fed a tannic acid diet, which is both bitter and astringent. WT mice upregulate SPs after a tannic acid diet exposure while KO models do not. These data suggest that the mice are able to alter their SP expression but taste signaling is needed to upregulate SPs to diet treatments. The astringency alone from the tannic acid was not able to upregulate SPs. We then asked whether SP upregulation varies with stimulus intensity. Rats were fed quinine or sucrose octaacetate (SOA) at three different concentrations. All rats decrease intake on first day of bitter diet exposure at all three concentrations but increase acceptance of the diet by the fifth day of the quinine. In response to quinine diet, animals show concentration-dependent SP upregulation at the 14 kDa band, other bands were upregulated by diet but were not concentration-dependent. SOA did not alter protein expression at any concentration.
{"title":"Functional bitter taste signaling and stimulus intensity influence diet-induced salivary protein upregulation","authors":"Verenice Ascencio Gutierrez , Kimberly F. Beede-James , Laura E. Martin , Kyle T. Zumpano , Kristen E. Kay , Kathryn F. Medler , Ann-Marie Torregrossa","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108418","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108418","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exposure to tannic acid- and quinine-containing diets upregulates subsets of salivary proteins (SPs), which in turn, results in increased acceptance of the “bitter” diet. However, it is unclear what aspects of the diet consumption influence SP upregulation. It has been thought that taste receptor activation is necessary for upregulation of SPs since sensory stimulation precedes changes in SPs, but no studies have confirmed the contribution of taste to SP upregulation.</div><div>To test this hypothesis, we used TRPM5 KO and TRPM4/5 DKO mice that have impaired bitter taste signaling. These mice are able to upregulate SPs in response to isoproterenol injections but not when fed a tannic acid diet, which is both bitter and astringent. WT mice upregulate SPs after a tannic acid diet exposure while KO models do not. These data suggest that the mice are able to alter their SP expression but taste signaling is needed to upregulate SPs to diet treatments. The astringency alone from the tannic acid was not able to upregulate SPs. We then asked whether SP upregulation varies with stimulus intensity. Rats were fed quinine or sucrose octaacetate (SOA) at three different concentrations. All rats decrease intake on first day of bitter diet exposure at all three concentrations but increase acceptance of the diet by the fifth day of the quinine. In response to quinine diet, animals show concentration-dependent SP upregulation at the 14 kDa band, other bands were upregulated by diet but were not concentration-dependent. SOA did not alter protein expression at any concentration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145747568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108415
Yoko Hasegawa , Tatsuya Suzuki , Syogo Yoshimura , Masako Shiramizu , Ma Therese Sta Maria , Masaki Sakata , Kensuke Yamamura , Takahiro Ono , Yumie Ono
This study aimed to examine how the emotional valence of food differentially modulates cortical hemodynamic responses. We investigated the neural basis of food preference by comparing brain activity during the intake of individually selected palatable and unpalatable foods.
Twenty-one healthy right-handed participants (10 males, 11 females; mean age: 28.1 ± 3.7 years) were included in the study. Palatable and unpalatable foods were selected based on pre-experimental questionnaires, and all participants fasted for 3 h before testing. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to assess hemodynamic changes in the bilateral frontoparietal regions during food ingestion. To reduce motion artifacts, only soft-textured foods were used. Emotional valence was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS), and raw fNIRS data were processed using spatial filtering to eliminate systemic effects. A general linear model was applied to extract activation related specifically to emotional responses, and cortical activity maps were generated from the oxygenated hemoglobin signals. One-sample t-tests were performed to identify common activation patterns in both palatable and unpalatable conditions.
The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) showed significant activation correlating with emotional valence intensity for both food types. Importantly, palatable and unpalatable foods engaged distinct subregions of the prefrontal cortex, suggesting that the qualitative direction of emotional valence, positive or negative, is encoded by distinct neural substrates rather than merely reflecting response intensity.
These findings imply that the DLPFC plays a significant role in the expression of food preferences, enhancing our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying food-related emotions and potentially informing strategies to address maladaptive eating behaviors.
{"title":"Impact of food-related emotional changes on cerebral hemodynamic response","authors":"Yoko Hasegawa , Tatsuya Suzuki , Syogo Yoshimura , Masako Shiramizu , Ma Therese Sta Maria , Masaki Sakata , Kensuke Yamamura , Takahiro Ono , Yumie Ono","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108415","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108415","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to examine how the emotional valence of food differentially modulates cortical hemodynamic responses. We investigated the neural basis of food preference by comparing brain activity during the intake of individually selected palatable and unpalatable foods.</div><div>Twenty-one healthy right-handed participants (10 males, 11 females; mean age: 28.1 ± 3.7 years) were included in the study. Palatable and unpalatable foods were selected based on pre-experimental questionnaires, and all participants fasted for 3 h before testing. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to assess hemodynamic changes in the bilateral frontoparietal regions during food ingestion. To reduce motion artifacts, only soft-textured foods were used. Emotional valence was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS), and raw fNIRS data were processed using spatial filtering to eliminate systemic effects. A general linear model was applied to extract activation related specifically to emotional responses, and cortical activity maps were generated from the oxygenated hemoglobin signals. One-sample t-tests were performed to identify common activation patterns in both palatable and unpalatable conditions.</div><div>The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) showed significant activation correlating with emotional valence intensity for both food types. Importantly, palatable and unpalatable foods engaged distinct subregions of the prefrontal cortex, suggesting that the qualitative direction of emotional valence, positive or negative, is encoded by distinct neural substrates rather than merely reflecting response intensity.</div><div>These findings imply that the DLPFC plays a significant role in the expression of food preferences, enhancing our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying food-related emotions and potentially informing strategies to address maladaptive eating behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145740338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}