Résumé : Le langage juridique se présente sous forme de textes difficilement accessibles aux non-initiés. Pourtant, certains de ces textes, comme les textes de lois, sont d’une utilité générale et concernent tout le monde. Tributaire de grands travaux de la théorie juridique sur l’incertitude juridique et de la pratique légistique française, cet article tente de rechercher les sources systémiques de cette situation paradoxale à partir d’exemples tirés notamment du Code civil français. Affirmant que les contradictions qui se manifestent sur le plan linguistique sont immanentes à tout ordre juridique, de l’opposition entre la précision et l’ambiguïté des termes et concepts juridiques, par le conflit entre leur côté traditionnel ou moderne, jusqu’à la divergence entre l’intelligibilité et la technicité des textes juridiques, l’article essaie d’identifier les contradictions systémiques principales responsables de l’accessibilité limitée du langage juridique tant au niveau du vocabulaire juridique qu’au niveau du discours du droit.
{"title":"LES CONTRADICTIONS SYSTEMIQUES COMME SOURCES D’ACCESSIBILITE DIFFICILE DU LANGAGE JURIDIQUE","authors":"Ivo Petrů","doi":"10.14746/cl.50.2022.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.50.2022.6","url":null,"abstract":"Résumé : Le langage juridique se présente sous forme de textes difficilement accessibles aux non-initiés. Pourtant, certains de ces textes, comme les textes de lois, sont d’une utilité générale et concernent tout le monde. Tributaire de grands travaux de la théorie juridique sur l’incertitude juridique et de la pratique légistique française, cet article tente de rechercher les sources systémiques de cette situation paradoxale à partir d’exemples tirés notamment du Code civil français. Affirmant que les contradictions qui se manifestent sur le plan linguistique sont immanentes à tout ordre juridique, de l’opposition entre la précision et l’ambiguïté des termes et concepts juridiques, par le conflit entre leur côté traditionnel ou moderne, jusqu’à la divergence entre l’intelligibilité et la technicité des textes juridiques, l’article essaie d’identifier les contradictions systémiques principales responsables de l’accessibilité limitée du langage juridique tant au niveau du vocabulaire juridique qu’au niveau du discours du droit.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43161658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
: Forty years after the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Peoples proclamation, and 54 years after its independence, Algeria officialized tamazight, the mother tongue of nearly 10 million of Berbers. But, despite its constitutionalization since 2016, tamazight remains a marginalized, minoritized language, not to say totally ignored. It is the poor relative of the government. Until nowadays, tamazight has difficulty in finding itself. Ignored by the Administration and Justice, it barely plays the walk-on in education and teaching. However, two years after its constitutionalization (national and official language), it is still in its stammering in the daily life of the natives who speak it (i.e., amazighofones or berberophones). It is only taught for 3,95% of the 9 million registered pupils. Not yet generalized in all of the country, its status remained much more facultative than compulsory. It is still considered just as a language to teach than as a language of instruction and education. Thus, the officialization of tamazight and its concrete application on the legal, educational, political, economic fields raise a lot of stakes. Many mentalities are to be reviewed and huge complexes must be overcome. It is not enough to proclaim tamazight “official” to give it back its nobility. As far as Algeria is concerned in the linguistic and democratic fields, alas, much remains to be done in order to build an Algeria of hope, the Algeria of tomorrow.
{"title":"L’EVOLUTION DU STATUT DE TAMAZIGHT DANS LA CONSTITUTION DE L’ETAT ALGERIEN","authors":"Rabah Tabti","doi":"10.14746/cl.50.2022.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.50.2022.8","url":null,"abstract":": Forty years after the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Peoples proclamation, and 54 years after its independence, Algeria officialized tamazight, the mother tongue of nearly 10 million of Berbers. But, despite its constitutionalization since 2016, tamazight remains a marginalized, minoritized language, not to say totally ignored. It is the poor relative of the government. Until nowadays, tamazight has difficulty in finding itself. Ignored by the Administration and Justice, it barely plays the walk-on in education and teaching. However, two years after its constitutionalization (national and official language), it is still in its stammering in the daily life of the natives who speak it (i.e., amazighofones or berberophones). It is only taught for 3,95% of the 9 million registered pupils. Not yet generalized in all of the country, its status remained much more facultative than compulsory. It is still considered just as a language to teach than as a language of instruction and education. Thus, the officialization of tamazight and its concrete application on the legal, educational, political, economic fields raise a lot of stakes. Many mentalities are to be reviewed and huge complexes must be overcome. It is not enough to proclaim tamazight “official” to give it back its nobility. As far as Algeria is concerned in the linguistic and democratic fields, alas, much remains to be done in order to build an Algeria of hope, the Algeria of tomorrow.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41899235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Der nachstehende Beitrag besteht aus zwei Teilen. Im ersten Teil wird das Berufsprofil des polnischen Sprachwissenschaftlers, Univ.-Prof. Dr. habil. Artur Dariusz Kubacki, beschrieben. Im Fokus steht sein beruflicher Werdegang. Er umfasst die vielfältige didaktische Tätigkeit, die breite Expertentätigkeit an verschiedenen Universitäten und in anderen Einrichtungen, die internationale und interinstitutionelle Zusammenarbeit, sowie Weiterbildungsformen. Demnächst werden die wichtigsten Leistungen in seinem Berufsleben dargestellt. Im zweiten Teil des Artikels wird das wissenschaftliche Schaffen vom polnischen Sprachwissenschaftler ausführlich präsentiert. Berücksichtigung finden hier vor allem seine zahlreichen legilinguistischen Veröffentlichungen.
{"title":"BERUFSPROFIL UND WISSENSCHAFTLICHES SCHAFFEN VON UNIV.-PROF. DR. HABIL. ARTUR DARIUSZ KUBACKI","authors":"J. Sekuła","doi":"10.14746/cl.2022.49.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2022.49.2","url":null,"abstract":"Der nachstehende Beitrag besteht aus zwei Teilen. Im ersten Teil wird das Berufsprofil des polnischen Sprachwissenschaftlers, Univ.-Prof. Dr. habil. Artur Dariusz Kubacki, beschrieben. Im Fokus steht sein beruflicher Werdegang. Er umfasst die vielfältige didaktische Tätigkeit, die breite Expertentätigkeit an verschiedenen Universitäten und in anderen Einrichtungen, die internationale und interinstitutionelle Zusammenarbeit, sowie Weiterbildungsformen. Demnächst werden die wichtigsten Leistungen in seinem Berufsleben dargestellt. Im zweiten Teil des Artikels wird das wissenschaftliche Schaffen vom polnischen Sprachwissenschaftler ausführlich präsentiert. Berücksichtigung finden hier vor allem seine zahlreichen legilinguistischen Veröffentlichungen.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43753770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This paper offers a multilingual perspective from the point of view of affective jurilinguistics on the link between the concepts of justice and play through media and literary discourses. The emotional impact of social norms on the members of any social group is highlighted, while individual and collective identity is built by playing. Playing is construed as a socializing activity per se, be it under an explicit or hidden form. Homo ludens is, by definition, a homo juridicus, too, as he complies with the rules of the social games which characterize life in a community. Researchers in the field of affective neurosciences have demonstrated that our perception of the world is first and foremost affective. The rational construction of concepts and discourse follows affective perception and is rooted in it. In the field of justice, this means that a person needs to feel safe within the group they belong to and make sure that their life and the group’s will go on. Perception is the result of a permanent social contract which is renewed regularly and cathartically through arts. Alain Supiot stated that man is a metaphysical animal, adding that “the life of the senses in a human being is intertwined with the meaning of life” (Supiot 2005: 7). By perceiving the world through his senses, the human being must bond with the other human beings, being thrown to the others through words. Thus, “the bond of the Law and the bonds of the words are intertwined in order to introduce every new-born baby to humanity, that is to give meaning to their life, in the double sense, general and juridical, of this word” (Supiot 2005: 8). Affective jurilinguistics appears to be a privileged area of multidisciplinary research in pragmatics, discourse analysis, history of mentalities and neurosciences, as well as a useful instrument for the observation of language and discourse phenomena within legal texts and texts which are related to the field of law and justice (journalistic and literary texts, etc.)
{"title":"Homo Juridicus and Homo Ludens: An Approach in Affective Jurilinguistics","authors":"C. Veleanu","doi":"10.2478/cl-2021-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper offers a multilingual perspective from the point of view of affective jurilinguistics on the link between the concepts of justice and play through media and literary discourses. The emotional impact of social norms on the members of any social group is highlighted, while individual and collective identity is built by playing. Playing is construed as a socializing activity per se, be it under an explicit or hidden form. Homo ludens is, by definition, a homo juridicus, too, as he complies with the rules of the social games which characterize life in a community. Researchers in the field of affective neurosciences have demonstrated that our perception of the world is first and foremost affective. The rational construction of concepts and discourse follows affective perception and is rooted in it. In the field of justice, this means that a person needs to feel safe within the group they belong to and make sure that their life and the group’s will go on. Perception is the result of a permanent social contract which is renewed regularly and cathartically through arts. Alain Supiot stated that man is a metaphysical animal, adding that “the life of the senses in a human being is intertwined with the meaning of life” (Supiot 2005: 7). By perceiving the world through his senses, the human being must bond with the other human beings, being thrown to the others through words. Thus, “the bond of the Law and the bonds of the words are intertwined in order to introduce every new-born baby to humanity, that is to give meaning to their life, in the double sense, general and juridical, of this word” (Supiot 2005: 8). Affective jurilinguistics appears to be a privileged area of multidisciplinary research in pragmatics, discourse analysis, history of mentalities and neurosciences, as well as a useful instrument for the observation of language and discourse phenomena within legal texts and texts which are related to the field of law and justice (journalistic and literary texts, etc.)","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46736704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This article presents the latest research on the perception of the translating profession from the book Tłumacz oczami społeczeństwa edited by Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska. The reviewed monograph includes articles that complement current research on the perception of the role and work of interpreters. The presentation of an introductory article concerning the identity of a court interpreter is followed by the results of the work conducted by six teams of young scientists; these studies can be divided into three groups. The former relates to the perception of the interpreter’s role by attorneys ad litem, judges, and students of non-philologic faculties, and to the cooperation between interpreters and judges. The second group includes a study on the required education of translators among students of philologic and nonphilologic faculties. Finally, the last group contains research on the impact of the level of knowledge of a foreign language and the age of probants on the perception of the translating profession and the impact of the presence of an interpreter on the attractiveness of statements.
{"title":"Recent Research on the Perception of the Translating Profession","authors":"Magdalena Łomzik","doi":"10.2478/cl-2021-0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0017","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents the latest research on the perception of the translating profession from the book Tłumacz oczami społeczeństwa edited by Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska. The reviewed monograph includes articles that complement current research on the perception of the role and work of interpreters. The presentation of an introductory article concerning the identity of a court interpreter is followed by the results of the work conducted by six teams of young scientists; these studies can be divided into three groups. The former relates to the perception of the interpreter’s role by attorneys ad litem, judges, and students of non-philologic faculties, and to the cooperation between interpreters and judges. The second group includes a study on the required education of translators among students of philologic and nonphilologic faculties. Finally, the last group contains research on the impact of the level of knowledge of a foreign language and the age of probants on the perception of the translating profession and the impact of the presence of an interpreter on the attractiveness of statements.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44162500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We present here because it will be so easy for you to access the internet service. As in this new era, much technology is sophistically offered by connecting to the internet. No any problems to face, just for this day, you can really keep in mind that the book is the best book for you. We offer the best here to read. After deciding how your feeling will be, you can enjoy to visit the link and get the book.
{"title":"All Roads Lead to Rome","authors":"Marcus Galdia","doi":"10.2478/cl-2021-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0016","url":null,"abstract":"We present here because it will be so easy for you to access the internet service. As in this new era, much technology is sophistically offered by connecting to the internet. No any problems to face, just for this day, you can really keep in mind that the book is the best book for you. We offer the best here to read. After deciding how your feeling will be, you can enjoy to visit the link and get the book.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46514125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Several are the European Directives dedicated to e-commerce, focussing on consumer rights, the distance marketing of consumer financial services and the protection of consumers indistance contracts.In contract law, the terms “termination”, “withdrawal”and “cancellation”have peculiar and distinct meaning. Nonetheless, they tend to be misused and applied interchangeably. This article will shed light on these relevant terms in thelight of EU Directives on the protection of consumer rights in off-premises and distance contracts.To do so, it will first present instances in which the meaningand use of these terms is either clear-cut or somehow blurred. By analysing word usage and meaning in context, it will explore how EU Directives, and EU drafters in general, made(un)ambiguous distinctions. Then, it will investigate whether English-speaking drafters (such as those of the pre-Brexit UK, Ireland and Malta) made a consistent use ofsuch terms. Finally, this paper will explore whether online conditions of sale writtenin English by non-English speaking sellers or traders (such as Italian and Polish) also make a consistent use of the terms.The paper findings highlight that the use andlegal purpose of these terms in European Directives have not been particularly consistent over the years. Furthermore, Member States’system-specificity has weighed on the meaning, application and scope of the terms. On the other hand, at EU level the absence of a unique legal system of reference and the challenges of harmonization may have created false equivalences.
{"title":"An Analysis of the “Right of Termination”, “Right of Cancellation” and “Right of Withdrawal” in off-Premises and Distance Contracts According to EU Directives","authors":"Patrizia Giampieri","doi":"10.2478/cl-2021-0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Several are the European Directives dedicated to e-commerce, focussing on consumer rights, the distance marketing of consumer financial services and the protection of consumers indistance contracts.In contract law, the terms “termination”, “withdrawal”and “cancellation”have peculiar and distinct meaning. Nonetheless, they tend to be misused and applied interchangeably. This article will shed light on these relevant terms in thelight of EU Directives on the protection of consumer rights in off-premises and distance contracts.To do so, it will first present instances in which the meaningand use of these terms is either clear-cut or somehow blurred. By analysing word usage and meaning in context, it will explore how EU Directives, and EU drafters in general, made(un)ambiguous distinctions. Then, it will investigate whether English-speaking drafters (such as those of the pre-Brexit UK, Ireland and Malta) made a consistent use ofsuch terms. Finally, this paper will explore whether online conditions of sale writtenin English by non-English speaking sellers or traders (such as Italian and Polish) also make a consistent use of the terms.The paper findings highlight that the use andlegal purpose of these terms in European Directives have not been particularly consistent over the years. Furthermore, Member States’system-specificity has weighed on the meaning, application and scope of the terms. On the other hand, at EU level the absence of a unique legal system of reference and the challenges of harmonization may have created false equivalences.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49194397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This essay is a survey of methods applied and topics scrutinized in legal-linguistic studies. It starts with the elucidation of the epistemic interest that led to the emergence and to the subsequent expansion of the mainstream legal-linguistic knowledge that we dispose of today. Thus, the essay focuses upon the development of problem awareness in the emerging legal-linguistic studies as well as upon the results of research that might be perceived as the state of the art in the mainstream legal linguistics. Meanwhile, some methodologically innovative tilts and twists that enrich and inspire contemporary legal linguistics are considered as well. Essentially, this essay traces the conceptual landscape in which the paradigms of legal-linguistic studies came about. This conceptual landscape extends from the research into the isolated words of law and the style used by jurists to the scrutiny of legal texts and legal discourses in all their socio-linguistic complexity. Within this broad frame of reference, many achievements in legal-linguistic studies are mentioned in order to sketch the consequences of processes in which legal-linguistic paradigms take shape. The author concludes upon a vision of legal linguistics called pragmatic legal linguistics as the newest stage in the intellectual enterprise that aims to pierce the language of the law and by so doing to understand law better.
{"title":"Conceptual Origins of Legal Linguistics","authors":"Marcus Galdia","doi":"10.2478/cl-2021-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0011","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay is a survey of methods applied and topics scrutinized in legal-linguistic studies. It starts with the elucidation of the epistemic interest that led to the emergence and to the subsequent expansion of the mainstream legal-linguistic knowledge that we dispose of today. Thus, the essay focuses upon the development of problem awareness in the emerging legal-linguistic studies as well as upon the results of research that might be perceived as the state of the art in the mainstream legal linguistics. Meanwhile, some methodologically innovative tilts and twists that enrich and inspire contemporary legal linguistics are considered as well. Essentially, this essay traces the conceptual landscape in which the paradigms of legal-linguistic studies came about. This conceptual landscape extends from the research into the isolated words of law and the style used by jurists to the scrutiny of legal texts and legal discourses in all their socio-linguistic complexity. Within this broad frame of reference, many achievements in legal-linguistic studies are mentioned in order to sketch the consequences of processes in which legal-linguistic paradigms take shape. The author concludes upon a vision of legal linguistics called pragmatic legal linguistics as the newest stage in the intellectual enterprise that aims to pierce the language of the law and by so doing to understand law better.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47429906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This paper mainly discusses the distribution and rhetorical functions of personal pronouns in English and Chinese legal news reports which is divided into two narrative types, the objective and the semi-dialogic. Through the comparative analysis of some English and Chinese legal news texts in the two types, it finds that the differences in narrative type directly affect the distribution of personal pronouns. In objective narrative, the use of third person pronouns accounts for an absolute proportion, and the frequency of using first person and second person pronouns is close to zero. In semi-dialogic narrative, the use of third person pronouns is still the highest, but only slightly higher than the use of first person and second person pronouns, accounting for only a small number. After analysis, this paper holds that there are three reasons for the uneven distribution: first, the differences between the dialogic style and the narrative style; second, the legal narrative being a story narrative; third, the specific restrictions on the use of legal rhetoric.
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Rhetorical Functions and Features of Personal Pronouns in English and Chinese Legal News","authors":"Qing Zhang","doi":"10.2478/cl-2021-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper mainly discusses the distribution and rhetorical functions of personal pronouns in English and Chinese legal news reports which is divided into two narrative types, the objective and the semi-dialogic. Through the comparative analysis of some English and Chinese legal news texts in the two types, it finds that the differences in narrative type directly affect the distribution of personal pronouns. In objective narrative, the use of third person pronouns accounts for an absolute proportion, and the frequency of using first person and second person pronouns is close to zero. In semi-dialogic narrative, the use of third person pronouns is still the highest, but only slightly higher than the use of first person and second person pronouns, accounting for only a small number. After analysis, this paper holds that there are three reasons for the uneven distribution: first, the differences between the dialogic style and the narrative style; second, the legal narrative being a story narrative; third, the specific restrictions on the use of legal rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46248521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：