首页 > 最新文献

Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos最新文献

英文 中文
The Ethnographic Principle as a Phenomenon of History 民族志原理作为一种历史现象
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI: 10.15388/LIS.2021.47.1
Česlovas Laurinavičius
The concept of the ethnographic principle is rarely found in the literature, and there is hardly a legal qualification for it. However, historical material (in cases of the Lithuanian, Czech, Bulgarian and Polish peoples) indicates that the ethnographic principle is a significant political and geopolitical phenomenon. This phenomen is especialy characteristic of the development of the peoples of the region of Central and Eastern Europe. First, the ethnographic principle was closely related to the national principle, although it did not coincide with it. The concept of the ethnographic principle points to the special anatomy of nation states, where the basis is ethnic / linguistic culture. Secondly, the advancement of culture to the fore indicated the recognition of its significance, which had not happened before. Consequently, it was a question of freeing this culture from the restrictions imposed on it and even compensating for the damage caused to it. Thirdly, the culture, raised to the state level, needed appropriate guarantees for the future. The article reveals the tendency of great states at the level of their policies and propaganda to act according to the ethnographic principle, thereby encouraging the formation of national states. However, when the latter became a fact, another tendency arose: the Western world began to apply the criteria of a liberal civil society to new states (according to the principle of jus civis romanus sum). This was too hard for the new states. In this context, the alternative was the Soviet ethno-federalist protectorate, which, although under the conditions of a repressive system, actually continued to implement the projections of the ethnographic principle. A fixed paradox: the ethnographic principle, which originated in the West as a variant of democratization, gained strength thanks to Russia, while the West remained, as it were, in aristocratic opposition to this course. The ethnographic principle has not yet acquired a clearer legal legitimacy. But as a historical category, it can serve as a study of the history of Modern times, and especially the Soviet period.
人种学原则的概念很少出现在文献中,也几乎没有法律资格。然而,历史材料(立陶宛、捷克、保加利亚和波兰人民的情况)表明,人种学原理是一种重要的政治和地缘政治现象。这种现象是中欧和东欧地区人民发展的特殊特征。首先,人种学原则与民族原则密切相关,尽管它与民族原则并不一致。人种学原理的概念指向民族国家的特殊解剖,其基础是民族/语言文化。其次,文化的进步表明了对其意义的认识,这是以前从未发生过的。因此,这是一个将这种文化从强加给它的限制中解放出来,甚至补偿对它造成的损害的问题。第三,这种文化被提升到国家层面,需要为未来提供适当的保障。文章揭示了大国在政策和宣传层面上按照民族志原则行事的倾向,从而鼓励民族国家的形成。然而,当后者成为事实时,另一种趋势出现了:西方世界开始将自由公民社会的标准应用于新的国家(根据罗马宪法的总和原则)。这对新的州来说太难了。在这种情况下,另一种选择是苏联民族联邦主义保护国,尽管在镇压制度的条件下,它实际上继续执行民族志原则的预测。一个固定的悖论是:民族志原则起源于西方,是民主化的一种变体,由于俄罗斯而获得了力量,而西方仍然是贵族阶层对这一进程的反对。人种学原则尚未获得更明确的法律合法性。但作为一个历史范畴,它可以作为研究近代史,特别是苏联时期的历史。
{"title":"The Ethnographic Principle as a Phenomenon of History","authors":"Česlovas Laurinavičius","doi":"10.15388/LIS.2021.47.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/LIS.2021.47.1","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of the ethnographic principle is rarely found in the literature, and there is hardly a legal qualification for it. However, historical material (in cases of the Lithuanian, Czech, Bulgarian and Polish peoples) indicates that the ethnographic principle is a significant political and geopolitical phenomenon. This phenomen is especialy characteristic of the development of the peoples of the region of Central and Eastern Europe. First, the ethnographic principle was closely related to the national principle, although it did not coincide with it. The concept of the ethnographic principle points to the special anatomy of nation states, where the basis is ethnic / linguistic culture. Secondly, the advancement of culture to the fore indicated the recognition of its significance, which had not happened before. Consequently, it was a question of freeing this culture from the restrictions imposed on it and even compensating for the damage caused to it. Thirdly, the culture, raised to the state level, needed appropriate guarantees for the future. The article reveals the tendency of great states at the level of their policies and propaganda to act according to the ethnographic principle, thereby encouraging the formation of national states. However, when the latter became a fact, another tendency arose: the Western world began to apply the criteria of a liberal civil society to new states (according to the principle of jus civis romanus sum). This was too hard for the new states. In this context, the alternative was the Soviet ethno-federalist protectorate, which, although under the conditions of a repressive system, actually continued to implement the projections of the ethnographic principle. A fixed paradox: the ethnographic principle, which originated in the West as a variant of democratization, gained strength thanks to Russia, while the West remained, as it were, in aristocratic opposition to this course. The ethnographic principle has not yet acquired a clearer legal legitimacy. But as a historical category, it can serve as a study of the history of Modern times, and especially the Soviet period.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47876725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Philosophy and the Implementation of Marxism-Leninism in Lithuania’s Higher Education Institutions from 1944 to 1947 1944—1947年立陶宛高等教育的哲学与马克思列宁主义的实施
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI: 10.15388/LIS.2021.47.3
Laurynas Peluritis
The article examines the introduction of Soviet Marxism (Marxism-Leninism) into the Lithuanian higher education system in 1944–1947. Based on archival sources and existing historiography, this paper explores the development of the higher education system in Lithuania during the first years of the Soviet occupation, including the translation, publication, and dissemination of ideological texts. It is argued that the introduction of Soviet Marxism in Lithuanian higher education institutions in 1944–1945 was carried out in a forced and chaotic manner, the organization of teaching and the preparation of ideological literature was slow, and there was a lack of staff to teach ideological courses. First came the creation of formal institutions (departments, divisions, institutes), and only then a consistent introduction of Marxist-Leninist teachings and the implementation of ideological control.
本文考察了1944-1947年苏联马克思主义(马列主义)进入立陶宛高等教育系统的情况。本文以档案资料和现有史学为基础,探讨了苏联占领初期立陶宛高等教育体系的发展,包括意识形态文本的翻译、出版和传播。文章认为,1944-1945年在立陶宛高等教育机构中引入苏联马克思主义是在强迫和混乱的情况下进行的,教学组织和意识形态文献的编写缓慢,并且缺乏教授意识形态课程的工作人员。首先是建立正式的机构(系、司、所),然后才是始终如一地引入马列主义教义和实施意识形态控制。
{"title":"Philosophy and the Implementation of Marxism-Leninism in Lithuania’s Higher Education Institutions from 1944 to 1947","authors":"Laurynas Peluritis","doi":"10.15388/LIS.2021.47.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/LIS.2021.47.3","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the introduction of Soviet Marxism (Marxism-Leninism) into the Lithuanian higher education system in 1944–1947. Based on archival sources and existing historiography, this paper explores the development of the higher education system in Lithuania during the first years of the Soviet occupation, including the translation, publication, and dissemination of ideological texts. It is argued that the introduction of Soviet Marxism in Lithuanian higher education institutions in 1944–1945 was carried out in a forced and chaotic manner, the organization of teaching and the preparation of ideological literature was slow, and there was a lack of staff to teach ideological courses. First came the creation of formal institutions (departments, divisions, institutes), and only then a consistent introduction of Marxist-Leninist teachings and the implementation of ideological control.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42066858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Was Protected by the State in Vilnius and Nowogródek Voivodeships Between 1928 and 1939? Evaluation and Listing of Cultural Monuments 1928年至1939年间,国家在维尔纽斯和诺沃格罗德克省保护了什么?文化古迹的评估和名录
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI: 10.15388/LIS.2021.47.2
Viktorija Kurienė
This article focuses on the process of monument listing, done by conservators of Vilnius in interwar Poland and which provided the monuments state protection. Between 1931 and 1939, monument conservators made 202 decisions confirming monumental value to various objects of architecture, urbanistics, archeology and nature. In the text the listing and evaluation process is described by analyzing the register of monuments and the decisions it was based on. The documents from the archive of the Art Department of Vilnius voivodeship are used in the article. The analysis of the register of monuments is based on statistical methods. Interpretation and evaluation are based on analytical and comparative methods. The research leads to findings that monument listing was dominated by architecture. Objects of nature were announced monuments based on their cultural value. Officially the status of a monument was given on the grounds of its aesthetics, age or documental value. However, the inner motive was Polishness. Thus, the most frequent monuments were baroque Catholic churches. The patriotic context is also seen in nature protection. The process of monument listing was led by only one expert – a conservator of monuments. The monument status and state protection depended on their interests, expertise and power. The conservator cooperated only with a small group of Polish authority and intelligentsia, leaving the majority of society out of this heritage process. The decision confirming monumental value was a way to control and have an impact directly on the monument’s existence, indirectly – on the discourse of memory. The monument listing reveals values and identities of a Polish art historian working for the state. Consequently, these values and identities were projected for the whole society as universal. This type of discourse on heritage, conception and practice was common in Western countries in the 20th c.
本文重点介绍了两次世界大战期间波兰维尔纽斯的保护人员对纪念碑进行的挂牌过程,为纪念碑的国家保护提供了依据。1931年至1939年间,纪念碑管理员做出了202项决定,确认了建筑、城市学、考古学和自然等各种物体的不朽价值。文中通过分析纪念碑登记册及其所依据的决定,描述了名录和评估过程。文章中使用了维尔纽斯省艺术部档案馆的文件。对古迹登记册的分析是以统计方法为基础的。解释和评价以分析和比较方法为基础。这项研究发现,纪念碑列表主要由建筑组成。自然物体被宣布为基于其文化价值的纪念碑。纪念碑的官方地位是基于其美学、年代或文献价值。然而,内心的动机是波兰主义。因此,最常见的纪念碑是巴洛克风格的天主教教堂。爱国主义的背景也体现在自然保护中。纪念碑挂牌过程只有一位专家领导——一位纪念碑管理员。纪念碑的地位和国家保护取决于他们的利益、专业知识和权力。这位保护人只与一小群波兰权威和知识分子合作,将社会大多数人排除在这一遗产过程之外。确认纪念碑价值的决定是一种直接控制纪念碑的存在并对其产生影响的方式,间接影响记忆的话语。纪念碑列表揭示了一位为国家工作的波兰艺术历史学家的价值观和身份。因此,这些价值观和身份被投射为整个社会的普遍性。这种关于遗产、概念和实践的论述在20世纪的西方国家很常见。
{"title":"What Was Protected by the State in Vilnius and Nowogródek Voivodeships Between 1928 and 1939? Evaluation and Listing of Cultural Monuments","authors":"Viktorija Kurienė","doi":"10.15388/LIS.2021.47.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/LIS.2021.47.2","url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the process of monument listing, done by conservators of Vilnius in interwar Poland and which provided the monuments state protection. Between 1931 and 1939, monument conservators made 202 decisions confirming monumental value to various objects of architecture, urbanistics, archeology and nature. In the text the listing and evaluation process is described by analyzing the register of monuments and the decisions it was based on. The documents from the archive of the Art Department of Vilnius voivodeship are used in the article. The analysis of the register of monuments is based on statistical methods. Interpretation and evaluation are based on analytical and comparative methods. The research leads to findings that monument listing was dominated by architecture. Objects of nature were announced monuments based on their cultural value. Officially the status of a monument was given on the grounds of its aesthetics, age or documental value. However, the inner motive was Polishness. Thus, the most frequent monuments were baroque Catholic churches. The patriotic context is also seen in nature protection. The process of monument listing was led by only one expert – a conservator of monuments. The monument status and state protection depended on their interests, expertise and power. The conservator cooperated only with a small group of Polish authority and intelligentsia, leaving the majority of society out of this heritage process. The decision confirming monumental value was a way to control and have an impact directly on the monument’s existence, indirectly – on the discourse of memory. The monument listing reveals values and identities of a Polish art historian working for the state. Consequently, these values and identities were projected for the whole society as universal. This type of discourse on heritage, conception and practice was common in Western countries in the 20th c.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43528941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vagrant and Neglected Minors in Soviet Lithuania 1944–1954: The Problem and the Solutions 1944-1954年苏联立陶宛流浪和被忽视的未成年人:问题和解决方案
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI: 10.15388/LIS.2021.47.4
Ieva Balčiūnė
This article presents the analysis of how the issue of vagrant and neglected (“беспризорные и безнадзорные”) minors in Soviet Lithuania was dealt with during the period of 1944–1954. After the Soviet occupation of Lithuania in 1944, stencil measures of dealing with the issue were imposed. However, the problem of vagrant and neglected minors in postwar Lithuania was specific and had changed. Therefore, the research reveals the dynamics of the problem and, by taking into account the Soviet Lithuanian context, the measures taken to solve it. Up until the beginning of the 1950s, vagrant and neglected minors were mostly street children and orphans from WWII. A considerable part of them had migrated from Russian and Belarusian territories in search for food. The government’s aims were to reduce their numbers, move them from the streets and change their official status. But in the 1950s, the problem, as it was seen, had transformed to juvenile delinquency and required respective measures. The research discovers how the system of custody, imprisonment, accommodation and care of these minors worked in early Soviet Lithuania.
本文分析了1944-1954年苏维埃立陶宛流浪和被忽视的未成年人(“беспризорные * безнадзорные”)问题是如何处理的。1944年苏联占领立陶宛后,对这一问题采取了严厉措施。然而,在战后立陶宛,流浪和被忽视的未成年人问题是具体的,并且已经发生了变化。因此,研究揭示了问题的动态,并考虑到苏联立陶宛的情况,揭示了为解决问题所采取的措施。直到20世纪50年代初,流浪和被忽视的未成年人大多是街头儿童和二战的孤儿。他们中有相当一部分是从俄罗斯和白俄罗斯领土迁移过来寻找食物的。政府的目标是减少他们的数量,让他们离开街头,改变他们的官方地位。但在20世纪50年代,这个问题,正如人们所看到的,已经转变为青少年犯罪,需要采取相应的措施。研究揭示了苏联早期立陶宛对这些未成年人的监护、监禁、住宿和照顾制度是如何运作的。
{"title":"Vagrant and Neglected Minors in Soviet Lithuania 1944–1954: The Problem and the Solutions","authors":"Ieva Balčiūnė","doi":"10.15388/LIS.2021.47.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/LIS.2021.47.4","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the analysis of how the issue of vagrant and neglected (“беспризорные и безнадзорные”) minors in Soviet Lithuania was dealt with during the period of 1944–1954. After the Soviet occupation of Lithuania in 1944, stencil measures of dealing with the issue were imposed. However, the problem of vagrant and neglected minors in postwar Lithuania was specific and had changed. Therefore, the research reveals the dynamics of the problem and, by taking into account the Soviet Lithuanian context, the measures taken to solve it. Up until the beginning of the 1950s, vagrant and neglected minors were mostly street children and orphans from WWII. A considerable part of them had migrated from Russian and Belarusian territories in search for food. The government’s aims were to reduce their numbers, move them from the streets and change their official status. But in the 1950s, the problem, as it was seen, had transformed to juvenile delinquency and required respective measures. The research discovers how the system of custody, imprisonment, accommodation and care of these minors worked in early Soviet Lithuania.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43984158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“The New Man” On-Demand: A Student in Lithuanian Schools of the Late Soviet Years (1964–1988) “新人”随需应变:苏联后期立陶宛学校的一名学生(1964–1988)
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI: 10.15388/LIS.2021.47.5
Akvilė Naudžiūnienė
This article presents a socio-historical study that combines an analysis of the theoretical model of the “new man” in the late Soviet period (1964–1988) with an empirical study of personal experiences of people who were students at schools in the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic (LSSR) during this period. The aim is to analyze how the teaching and learning process were organized during the late Soviet period in LSSR schools, how it was understood by the participants of this study, and what were the possible differences in the experiences of schoolchildren. Also, it is equally important to determine which of the schoolchildren’s experiences in this period could be qualified as “unifying experiences” that formed the mentality of the late Soviet period generation. These experiences are compared with the common Soviet vision of the “new man” education, which was also changing during the late Soviet period. While searching for the answer to how much of the theoretical “new man” model was adopted by this last Soviet generation in LSSR, we use a post-revisionist approach and focus on the narrative of everyday history – what it meant to be schoolchildren in Soviet schools. The research revealed that the formal institutionalization of collective life for schoolchildren through Pioneer or Komsomol organizations was ineffective in creating a collective community feeling between the young generation. During the late Soviet period in LSSR schools there were four main disciplinary practices: formal notices by writing or by word, unsanctioned physical punishments, preventive disciplinary practices, and informal shaming. The last informal disciplinary practice was considered by schoolchildren in todays perspective as the most effective means of discipline at schools. These practices reflected the model of monitoring each other in the adult Soviet society and formed the horizontal control system involving students, their parents, and teachers. The research revealed a preliminary informal social stratification of children in LSSR schools during the late Soviet period. It was not related to the vision of “the new man” education but encouraged an already existing division within the LSSR society. This was a complete departure from the ethical-moral visions of educating “the new man” in schools, which were based on the demolition of the established class division, enabling this “new man” to create a welfare of socialist society by their own hard work and heroic achievements.
本文提出了一项社会历史研究,结合了对苏联后期(1964-1988)“新人”理论模型的分析,以及对这一时期立陶宛苏维埃社会主义共和国(LSSR)学校学生个人经历的实证研究。目的是分析苏联后期LSSR学校的教学和学习过程是如何组织的,本研究的参与者是如何理解的,以及学童的经历可能存在什么差异。同样重要的是,要确定这一时期哪些学童的经历可以被称为“统一经历”,形成了苏联后期一代人的心态。这些经验与苏联对“新人”教育的普遍看法进行了比较,这种看法在苏联后期也发生了变化。在寻找“新人”理论模型在多大程度上被LSSR的最后一代苏联人所采用的答案时,我们使用了后修正主义的方法,并将重点放在日常历史的叙述上——在苏联学校上学意味着什么。研究结果显示,通过先锋队或共青团等组织将学生的集体生活正式制度化,并不能在年轻一代之间建立集体归属感。在苏联后期,LSSR学校有四种主要的纪律措施:书面或口头的正式通知、未经批准的体罚、预防性纪律措施和非正式的羞辱。最后的非正式纪律实践被今天的学生认为是学校纪律最有效的手段。这些做法反映了苏联成人社会中相互监督的模式,形成了包括学生、家长和教师在内的横向控制体系。这项研究揭示了苏联后期苏维埃社会主义共和国学校儿童的初步非正式社会分层。这与“新人”教育的愿景无关,而是鼓励了LSSR社会中已经存在的分裂。这完全背离了在学校教育“新人”的伦理-道德愿景,这种愿景的基础是拆除既定的阶级划分,使“新人”能够通过自己的辛勤劳动和英雄成就创造社会主义社会的福利。
{"title":"“The New Man” On-Demand: A Student in Lithuanian Schools of the Late Soviet Years (1964–1988)","authors":"Akvilė Naudžiūnienė","doi":"10.15388/LIS.2021.47.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/LIS.2021.47.5","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a socio-historical study that combines an analysis of the theoretical model of the “new man” in the late Soviet period (1964–1988) with an empirical study of personal experiences of people who were students at schools in the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic (LSSR) during this period. The aim is to analyze how the teaching and learning process were organized during the late Soviet period in LSSR schools, how it was understood by the participants of this study, and what were the possible differences in the experiences of schoolchildren. Also, it is equally important to determine which of the schoolchildren’s experiences in this period could be qualified as “unifying experiences” that formed the mentality of the late Soviet period generation. These experiences are compared with the common Soviet vision of the “new man” education, which was also changing during the late Soviet period. While searching for the answer to how much of the theoretical “new man” model was adopted by this last Soviet generation in LSSR, we use a post-revisionist approach and focus on the narrative of everyday history – what it meant to be schoolchildren in Soviet schools. The research revealed that the formal institutionalization of collective life for schoolchildren through Pioneer or Komsomol organizations was ineffective in creating a collective community feeling between the young generation. During the late Soviet period in LSSR schools there were four main disciplinary practices: formal notices by writing or by word, unsanctioned physical punishments, preventive disciplinary practices, and informal shaming. The last informal disciplinary practice was considered by schoolchildren in todays perspective as the most effective means of discipline at schools. These practices reflected the model of monitoring each other in the adult Soviet society and formed the horizontal control system involving students, their parents, and teachers. The research revealed a preliminary informal social stratification of children in LSSR schools during the late Soviet period. It was not related to the vision of “the new man” education but encouraged an already existing division within the LSSR society. This was a complete departure from the ethical-moral visions of educating “the new man” in schools, which were based on the demolition of the established class division, enabling this “new man” to create a welfare of socialist society by their own hard work and heroic achievements.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44734407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Old Believers Church in Lithuania (1918–1926): The Restoration and Recognition of Parishes, the Legitimation of the Church, and the Problems of Autonomy 立陶宛的旧信徒教会(1918–1926):教区的恢复和承认、教会的合法化和自治问题
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI: 10.15388/lis.2020.46.3
Grigorijus Potašenko
The purpose of this article is to research in more detail the restoration of the Old Believers parishes and their recognition during the interwar Lithuania (excluding Vilnius region) from 1918 to 1923, as well as to analyse the legalization of the Old Believers’ Church of Lithuania and the problems of practical establishment of religious autonomy in this period. The main focus is on three new problems: the situation of the Old Believers’ parishes in the country at the beginning of 1918, taking into account the mass migration to the depths of Russia from 1914 to 1915; the restoration of Old Believers parishes and the legalization (registration) of their religious activities from 1918 to 1922, during their mass repatriation to Lithuania; and focus on some problems of the practical consolidation of Old Believers’ Church of Lithuania autonomy from 1923 to 1926. The research is based mostly on new archival data, as well as on the analysis and interpretation of Lithuanian and partly foreign historiography on this topic. The study suggests that due to the mass migration of Old Believers to the East between 1914 and 1915, the future Lithuanian territory retained a much thinner congregation network and in turn had fewer parishes members by the beginning of 1918. Therefore, the mass repatriation of the Old Believers from Soviet Russia from the spring of 1918 to 1922 to a large extent explains why the recovery of many of their parishes in Lithuania has been rather slow. After the establishment of the central institutions of the Church in May 1922, the Lithuanian Old Believers’ Church was legalized on the basis of “Provisional regulations concerning the relationship between the organization of Old Believers in Lithuania and the Lithuanian government” on the May 20, 1923. Therefore, for the first time in history in 1923 the Lithuanian Old Believers Church was legally recognized in a certain state and formally received equal rights with other recognized denominations. At that time, Lithuania was the first country in Central and Eastern Europe to officially recognize the Old Believers (Pomorian) Church.
本文的目的是更详细地研究1918年至1923年两次世界大战期间立陶宛(不包括维尔纽斯地区)旧信徒教区的恢复和承认,并分析立陶宛旧信徒教会的合法化以及这一时期实际建立宗教自主权的问题。主要关注三个新问题:考虑到1914年至1915年向俄罗斯深处的大规模移民,1918年初该国旧信徒教区的情况;1918年至1922年,在大规模遣返立陶宛期间,恢复了旧信徒教区,并使其宗教活动合法化(登记);并着重探讨1923年至1926年立陶宛旧信徒教会自治实际巩固过程中的一些问题。这项研究主要基于新的档案数据,以及立陶宛和部分外国史学对这一主题的分析和解释。研究表明,由于1914年至1915年间老信徒大规模向东方迁移,到1918年初,未来的立陶宛领土保留了一个更薄的会众网络,而教区成员也减少了。因此,1918年春季至1922年苏俄大规模遣返老信徒在很大程度上解释了为什么他们在立陶宛的许多教区恢复得相当缓慢。1922年5月教会中央机构成立后,1923年5月20日,根据《立陶宛旧信徒组织与立陶宛政府关系暂行规定》,立陶宛旧信徒教会合法化。因此,1923年,立陶宛旧信徒教会在历史上第一次在某个州获得法律承认,并正式获得与其他公认教派平等的权利。当时,立陶宛是中欧和东欧第一个正式承认老信徒(波摩罗马教会)的国家。
{"title":"Old Believers Church in Lithuania (1918–1926): The Restoration and Recognition of Parishes, the Legitimation of the Church, and the Problems of Autonomy","authors":"Grigorijus Potašenko","doi":"10.15388/lis.2020.46.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lis.2020.46.3","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to research in more detail the restoration of the Old Believers parishes and their recognition during the interwar Lithuania (excluding Vilnius region) from 1918 to 1923, as well as to analyse the legalization of the Old Believers’ Church of Lithuania and the problems of practical establishment of religious autonomy in this period. The main focus is on three new problems: the situation of the Old Believers’ parishes in the country at the beginning of 1918, taking into account the mass migration to the depths of Russia from 1914 to 1915; the restoration of Old Believers parishes and the legalization (registration) of their religious activities from 1918 to 1922, during their mass repatriation to Lithuania; and focus on some problems of the practical consolidation of Old Believers’ Church of Lithuania autonomy from 1923 to 1926. The research is based mostly on new archival data, as well as on the analysis and interpretation of Lithuanian and partly foreign historiography on this topic. The study suggests that due to the mass migration of Old Believers to the East between 1914 and 1915, the future Lithuanian territory retained a much thinner congregation network and in turn had fewer parishes members by the beginning of 1918. Therefore, the mass repatriation of the Old Believers from Soviet Russia from the spring of 1918 to 1922 to a large extent explains why the recovery of many of their parishes in Lithuania has been rather slow. After the establishment of the central institutions of the Church in May 1922, the Lithuanian Old Believers’ Church was legalized on the basis of “Provisional regulations concerning the relationship between the organization of Old Believers in Lithuania and the Lithuanian government” on the May 20, 1923. Therefore, for the first time in history in 1923 the Lithuanian Old Believers Church was legally recognized in a certain state and formally received equal rights with other recognized denominations. At that time, Lithuania was the first country in Central and Eastern Europe to officially recognize the Old Believers (Pomorian) Church.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41262283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intelligentsia talks to the Government 知识分子与政府对话
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI: 10.15388/lis.2020.46.7
Valdemaras Klumbys
  
{"title":"Intelligentsia talks to the Government","authors":"Valdemaras Klumbys","doi":"10.15388/lis.2020.46.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lis.2020.46.7","url":null,"abstract":"  ","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42730456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Images of Illegal Economical Activities and the Fight against Them in Lithuanian Press in 1938–1940 1938-1940年立陶宛新闻界对非法经济活动的形象及其打击
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI: 10.15388/lis.2020.46.5
Darius Indrišionis
Various illegal economical activities such as speculation, moonshine production, etc. were popular subjects in the Lithuanian press of 1938–1940. Economic problems were important for the Lithuanian society during those harsh years, so these publications did their part to influence public opinion. This article focuses on the most popular narratives of illegal economical activities in the Lithuanian press of 1938–1940: 1) the Price Control Officer and his struggle against speculation; 2) propaganda methods in solving the problem of moonshine (illegal breweries); 3) other illegal economical activities (illegal medical or law practice, prostitution, etc.). In conclusion, Lithuanian authorities used mild methods against the illegal part of the economy. The Price Control Officer, one of the most popular authority figures in 1938–1940 Lithuania, used to bribe businessmen who were mixed up in speculation and to publish lists of those so called “speculators” periodically. This policy was morally doubtful because it influenced some antisemitic thoughts (as the majority of those bribed “speculators” were of Jewish descent). Police methods were not enough to reach victory against widespread moonshiners. In the summer of 1938, a high-scale propaganda campaign against moonshine was launched. Fighting other illegal economical activities was problematic due to a lack of jurisprudence and legal alternatives.
各种非法经济活动,如投机、私酒生产等,是1938-1940年立陶宛新闻界的热门话题。在那些艰难的岁月里,经济问题对立陶宛社会来说是重要的,因此这些出版物发挥了影响公众舆论的作用。本文重点介绍了1938-1940年立陶宛新闻界对非法经济活动最流行的叙述:1)价格管制官员和他与投机的斗争;2)解决私酒(非法酿酒厂)问题的宣传方法;3)其他非法经济活动(非法行医、非法执业、卖淫等)。总之,立陶宛当局对经济的非法部分采取了温和的方法。价格控制官员是1938-1940年间立陶宛最受欢迎的权威人物之一,他过去常常贿赂那些卷入投机活动的商人,并定期公布所谓“投机者”的名单。这一政策在道德上是值得怀疑的,因为它影响了一些反犹思想(因为那些被贿赂的“投机者”大多数是犹太血统)。警方的手段不足以战胜泛滥的私酒贩子。1938年夏天,一场反对私酒的大规模宣传运动开始了。打击其他非法经济活动是有问题的,因为缺乏法理和法律选择。
{"title":"The Images of Illegal Economical Activities and the Fight against Them in Lithuanian Press in 1938–1940","authors":"Darius Indrišionis","doi":"10.15388/lis.2020.46.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lis.2020.46.5","url":null,"abstract":"Various illegal economical activities such as speculation, moonshine production, etc. were popular subjects in the Lithuanian press of 1938–1940. Economic problems were important for the Lithuanian society during those harsh years, so these publications did their part to influence public opinion. This article focuses on the most popular narratives of illegal economical activities in the Lithuanian press of 1938–1940: 1) the Price Control Officer and his struggle against speculation; 2) propaganda methods in solving the problem of moonshine (illegal breweries); 3) other illegal economical activities (illegal medical or law practice, prostitution, etc.). In conclusion, Lithuanian authorities used mild methods against the illegal part of the economy. The Price Control Officer, one of the most popular authority figures in 1938–1940 Lithuania, used to bribe businessmen who were mixed up in speculation and to publish lists of those so called “speculators” periodically. This policy was morally doubtful because it influenced some antisemitic thoughts (as the majority of those bribed “speculators” were of Jewish descent). Police methods were not enough to reach victory against widespread moonshiners. In the summer of 1938, a high-scale propaganda campaign against moonshine was launched. Fighting other illegal economical activities was problematic due to a lack of jurisprudence and legal alternatives.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43994251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
(Non)historical Research of The Historical Period of Rebirth 重生历史时期的(非)历史研究
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI: 10.15388/lis.2020.46.8
Tomas Vaitelė
Rec.: Anna Mikonis-Railienė, Renata Šukaitytė, Mantas Martišius, Renata Stonytė, Politinis lūžis ekrane: (po)komunistinė transformacija Lietuvos dokumentiniame kine, videokronikoje ir televizijoje, Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2020.
记录:Anna Mikonis Railienë,RenataŠukaittyë,Mantas Martišius,Renata Stonytë,《政治突破屏幕:立陶宛纪录片、视频编年史和电视中的共产主义转变》,维尔纽斯:维尔纽斯大学出版社,2020年。
{"title":"(Non)historical Research of The Historical Period of Rebirth","authors":"Tomas Vaitelė","doi":"10.15388/lis.2020.46.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lis.2020.46.8","url":null,"abstract":"Rec.: Anna Mikonis-Railienė, Renata Šukaitytė, Mantas Martišius, Renata Stonytė, Politinis lūžis ekrane: (po)komunistinė transformacija Lietuvos dokumentiniame kine, videokronikoje ir televizijoje, Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2020.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49035675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Farms Divided between Lithuania and Poland: The Problems of Lithuania’s Farmers and the Defence of Their Interests, 1923–1939 立陶宛和波兰之间的农场:1923–1939年立陶宛农民的问题及其利益保护
Q4 HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI: 10.15388/lis.2020.46.4
Leonas Nekrašas
During the interwar years the situation between Lithuania and Poland was tense. Lithuania never stopped claiming Vilnius as its capital city and did not recognize it as a part of Poland – therefore these countries did not have diplomatic relations. Travelling possibilities between these alienated states were greatly restricted and (as Lithuania did not recognize the demarcation line dividing both countries as an official state border) their borderland was an area of frequent violence, provocations, and ever present tension. The border situation created a problem for local people – the demarcation line (conclusively established in 1923 after the dissolution of the demilitarized neutral zone that separated both states) divided the farms of many local farmers leaving thousands of hectares of farmland belonging to residents of Poland in Lithuania and vice versa. Both countries agreed to allow the farmers of these divided farms to cross the demarcation line to continue to use and work their land. However, these people were directly caught up in the feud between their antagonistic states and suffered from it. This paper explores the struggles experienced by Lithuania’s farmers (frequently and deliberately obstructed by Poland’s border guards) and the efforts of Lithuanian state institutions to defend their interests. The analysis showcases an unorthodox situation and uncovers unique ways of communicating and solving problems established between states that had no diplomatic relations in the interest of their local citizens. The methods used gradually evolved from the use of the basic “An eye for an eye“ type of retaliation (reacting to obstruction by causing equivalent difficulties to farmers of the opposing country) to frequent meetings between local officials of both nations in a borderland marked by tension and conflict. Various methods that were used to better the situation of local farmers are analysed. The paper uncovers the core principles that determined and guided the policy of Lithuanian state institutions. Most significantly, it was a recognition of importance of reacting to every obstructive action made against Lithuanian citizens. There was also a great avoidance to act (or react) in a way that could be interpreted as recognizing the demarcation line as the state border. The situation regarding the issue of the divided farms after the Polish ultimatum and the establishment of diplomatic relations between Lithuania and Poland in 1938 is examined.
在两次世界大战期间,立陶宛和波兰之间的局势十分紧张。立陶宛从未停止宣称维尔纽斯为其首都,也不承认其为波兰的一部分——因此这些国家没有外交关系。这些被疏远的国家之间的旅行可能性受到极大限制,而且(由于立陶宛不承认划分两国的分界线为官方国家边界)他们的边境地区经常发生暴力、挑衅和持续的紧张局势。边界局势给当地人带来了一个问题——分界线(1923年分隔两国的非军事中立区解散后最终确定)分割了许多当地农民的农场,留下了数千公顷属于立陶宛波兰居民的农田,反之亦然。两国同意允许这些被分割农场的农民越过分界线,继续使用和耕种他们的土地。然而,这些人直接陷入了敌对国家之间的不和中,并因此而受苦。本文探讨了立陶宛农民所经历的斗争(经常受到波兰边防军的蓄意阻挠)以及立陶宛国家机构为捍卫他们的利益所做的努力。该分析展示了一种非正统的情况,并揭示了为了当地公民的利益而没有外交关系的国家之间沟通和解决问题的独特方式。所使用的方法逐渐演变为使用基本的“以眼还眼”式的报复(通过给对方国家的农民造成同等困难来应对阻碍)两国地方官员在以紧张和冲突为标志的边境地区频繁会面。分析了用于改善当地农民状况的各种方法。本文揭示了决定和指导立陶宛国家机构政策的核心原则。最重要的是,它承认了对针对立陶宛公民的每一项阻挠行动作出反应的重要性。也有很大的避免以一种可以被解释为承认分界线为国家边界的方式采取行动(或作出反应)。研究了波兰最后通牒和立陶宛与波兰于1938年建立外交关系后的农场分割问题。
{"title":"Farms Divided between Lithuania and Poland: The Problems of Lithuania’s Farmers and the Defence of Their Interests, 1923–1939","authors":"Leonas Nekrašas","doi":"10.15388/lis.2020.46.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lis.2020.46.4","url":null,"abstract":"During the interwar years the situation between Lithuania and Poland was tense. Lithuania never stopped claiming Vilnius as its capital city and did not recognize it as a part of Poland – therefore these countries did not have diplomatic relations. Travelling possibilities between these alienated states were greatly restricted and (as Lithuania did not recognize the demarcation line dividing both countries as an official state border) their borderland was an area of frequent violence, provocations, and ever present tension. The border situation created a problem for local people – the demarcation line (conclusively established in 1923 after the dissolution of the demilitarized neutral zone that separated both states) divided the farms of many local farmers leaving thousands of hectares of farmland belonging to residents of Poland in Lithuania and vice versa. Both countries agreed to allow the farmers of these divided farms to cross the demarcation line to continue to use and work their land. However, these people were directly caught up in the feud between their antagonistic states and suffered from it. This paper explores the struggles experienced by Lithuania’s farmers (frequently and deliberately obstructed by Poland’s border guards) and the efforts of Lithuanian state institutions to defend their interests. The analysis showcases an unorthodox situation and uncovers unique ways of communicating and solving problems established between states that had no diplomatic relations in the interest of their local citizens. The methods used gradually evolved from the use of the basic “An eye for an eye“ type of retaliation (reacting to obstruction by causing equivalent difficulties to farmers of the opposing country) to frequent meetings between local officials of both nations in a borderland marked by tension and conflict. Various methods that were used to better the situation of local farmers are analysed. The paper uncovers the core principles that determined and guided the policy of Lithuanian state institutions. Most significantly, it was a recognition of importance of reacting to every obstructive action made against Lithuanian citizens. There was also a great avoidance to act (or react) in a way that could be interpreted as recognizing the demarcation line as the state border. The situation regarding the issue of the divided farms after the Polish ultimatum and the establishment of diplomatic relations between Lithuania and Poland in 1938 is examined.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46502361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1