The present contribution provides full editions of all texts belonging to the archive of the Sipparean businessman Iššar-tarībi, who was active during the last years of the Neo-Babylonian kingdom and the early years of Achaemenid rule, as well as a brief discussion of its central features. It is part of a larger collaborative effort to make available the so-called “satellite archives” of the Ṣāḫiṭ-ginê A archive and related and unrelated smaller archives from Sippar. The results will be published in forthcoming volumes of this journal; archives in preparation include those of Adad-šamê, Mušēzib, Rēˀi-sisê, and Ša-nāšišu A (Y. Levavi), Balīhu, Aqūba, and Šamaš-iddin/Rēmūt (J. Hackl), as well as Šangû-Šamaš and Šangû-Ištar-Bābili (M. Gross). A companion volume containing copies of all tablets published in this series as well as a comprehensive prosopography is in preparation for the JCS Supplemental Series.
{"title":"Minor Archives from First-Millennium Bce Babylonia: The Archive of Iššar-Tarībi from Sippar","authors":"R. Pirngruber","doi":"10.1086/709315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709315","url":null,"abstract":"The present contribution provides full editions of all texts belonging to the archive of the Sipparean businessman Iššar-tarībi, who was active during the last years of the Neo-Babylonian kingdom and the early years of Achaemenid rule, as well as a brief discussion of its central features. It is part of a larger collaborative effort to make available the so-called “satellite archives” of the Ṣāḫiṭ-ginê A archive and related and unrelated smaller archives from Sippar. The results will be published in forthcoming volumes of this journal; archives in preparation include those of Adad-šamê, Mušēzib, Rēˀi-sisê, and Ša-nāšišu A (Y. Levavi), Balīhu, Aqūba, and Šamaš-iddin/Rēmūt (J. Hackl), as well as Šangû-Šamaš and Šangû-Ištar-Bābili (M. Gross). A companion volume containing copies of all tablets published in this series as well as a comprehensive prosopography is in preparation for the JCS Supplemental Series.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"165 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709315","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45219720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The proposal is here offered to read the Ugaritic administrative text RS 10.052 iv 1 as containing the personal name pǵmw, the Ugaritic writing of the Luwian name Piḫamuwa.
兹建议将乌加里特行政文本RS 10.052 iv 1解读为包含个人姓名pǵmw，乌加里特语的卢维安姓名Piḫamuwa。
{"title":"The Personal Name in Ugaritic Script pǵm˹w˺ (RS 10.052 iv 1) = Luwian piḫamuwa","authors":"D. Pardee, M. Richey","doi":"10.1086/709314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709314","url":null,"abstract":"The proposal is here offered to read the Ugaritic administrative text RS 10.052 iv 1 as containing the personal name pǵmw, the Ugaritic writing of the Luwian name Piḫamuwa.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"157 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709314","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45525869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AO 8900, AO 8901, and AO 8902 are three hitherto unpublished Old Babylonian mathematical cuneiform tablets containing multiplication tables. Their physical and textual characteristics suggest that they were produced in the same ancient context. What is remarkable about this small set of tablets is that, unlike most such tablets, two of them have colophons: in AO 8900 we find a month-and-day date, while in AO 8901 we find a damaged year name. These tablets are published here for the first time, together with a discussion of how the information about the year name in AO 8901 fits in what is known about the dating of Old Babylonian mathematics.
AO 8900、AO 8901和AO 8902是迄今为止未出版的三块包含乘法表的古巴比伦数学楔形文字板。它们的物理和文本特征表明，它们是在相同的古代背景下产生的。这一小套平板电脑值得注意的是，与大多数此类平板电脑不同，其中两款平板电脑有colophon：在AO 8900中，我们发现了一个月和一天的日期，而在AO 8901中，我们找到了一个损坏的年份名称。这些平板电脑首次在这里发布，同时讨论了AO 8901中关于年号的信息如何与已知的古巴比伦数学年代相吻合。
{"title":"Three New Multiplication Tables From the Louvre: AO 8900, AO 8901, AND AO 8902","authors":"Carlos Gonçalves","doi":"10.1086/709310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709310","url":null,"abstract":"AO 8900, AO 8901, and AO 8902 are three hitherto unpublished Old Babylonian mathematical cuneiform tablets containing multiplication tables. Their physical and textual characteristics suggest that they were produced in the same ancient context. What is remarkable about this small set of tablets is that, unlike most such tablets, two of them have colophons: in AO 8900 we find a month-and-day date, while in AO 8901 we find a damaged year name. These tablets are published here for the first time, together with a discussion of how the information about the year name in AO 8901 fits in what is known about the dating of Old Babylonian mathematics.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"101 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709310","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43424755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Several fragmentary Sumerian cultic songs from Old Babylonian Nippur, including one that seems to be for Ninurta (“Ninurta H”), contain enumerations of major cultic centers in southern Mesopotamia that are unmistakably reminiscent of the Sumerian Temple Hymns, as well as two hymns to King Shulgi. The following communication considers the potential parameters of intertexuality that may be involved with these texts. Such proximity to the corpus of cultic songs qualifies the Sitz im Leben of the Temple Hymns at Old Babylonian Nippur.
古巴比伦尼普尔的几首零散的苏美尔邪教歌曲，包括一首似乎是为尼努尔塔（“Ninurta H”）而写的，其中列举了美索不达米亚南部的主要邪教中心，这些歌曲无疑让人想起了苏美尔神庙圣歌，以及两首献给舒尔吉国王的赞美诗。以下交流考虑了这些文本可能涉及的潜在的跨性参数。如此接近邪教歌曲的语料库，使古巴比伦尼普神庙圣歌的Sitz im Leben成为合格。
{"title":"Sumerian Cultic Songs from Old Babylonian Nippur with a Connection to the Temple Hymns","authors":"J. Peterson","doi":"10.1086/709312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709312","url":null,"abstract":"Several fragmentary Sumerian cultic songs from Old Babylonian Nippur, including one that seems to be for Ninurta (“Ninurta H”), contain enumerations of major cultic centers in southern Mesopotamia that are unmistakably reminiscent of the Sumerian Temple Hymns, as well as two hymns to King Shulgi. The following communication considers the potential parameters of intertexuality that may be involved with these texts. Such proximity to the corpus of cultic songs qualifies the Sitz im Leben of the Temple Hymns at Old Babylonian Nippur.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"129 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709312","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47977695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
It is generally thought that the Old Hittite Palace Chronicle was composed by Muršili I (reigned ca. 1620–1590 BCE) and that the anecdotes featuring in this composition thus took place during the reign of his predecessor Ḫattušili I (ca. 1650–1620 BCE). Recently, Forlanini proposed that the text’s author was not Muršili I but rather Ḫattušili I, who tells about the times of his predecessor Labarna I (ca. 1680(?)–1650 BCE). In the present article it will be argued that both views are difficult to maintain. Instead, six arguments will be presented that rather indicate that the Palace Chronicle may have been authored by Anitta, king of Nēša (reigned ca. 1740–1725 BCE), and that the composition recounts the reign of Anitta’s father Pitḫāna, with some anecdotes even dating back to the times before Pitḫāna’s conquest of the city of Nēša, i.e. before 1750 BCE.
{"title":"The Authorship of the Old Hittite Palace Chronicle (CTH 8): A Case for Anitta","authors":"Alwin Kloekhorst","doi":"10.1086/709313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709313","url":null,"abstract":"It is generally thought that the Old Hittite Palace Chronicle was composed by Muršili I (reigned ca. 1620–1590 BCE) and that the anecdotes featuring in this composition thus took place during the reign of his predecessor Ḫattušili I (ca. 1650–1620 BCE). Recently, Forlanini proposed that the text’s author was not Muršili I but rather Ḫattušili I, who tells about the times of his predecessor Labarna I (ca. 1680(?)–1650 BCE). In the present article it will be argued that both views are difficult to maintain. Instead, six arguments will be presented that rather indicate that the Palace Chronicle may have been authored by Anitta, king of Nēša (reigned ca. 1740–1725 BCE), and that the composition recounts the reign of Anitta’s father Pitḫāna, with some anecdotes even dating back to the times before Pitḫāna’s conquest of the city of Nēša, i.e. before 1750 BCE.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"143 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709313","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43063061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cylinder seal impressions rank highly among the epigraphic sources concerning the šakkanakkus (rulers) of Mari, especially those that reigned during the 20th and first part of 19th centuries BCE, that is the final phase of the šakkanakku period that preceded the reign of Yaḫdun-Lîm in Mari ca. 1820/1810 BC. New readings of the seal impressions ME64+ME196 and ME14 indicate that they all belong to the same cylinder seal belonging to a ruler named Tīnīn-Dagan, whose father was Iddin-Dagan. Both rulers were previously unknown.
{"title":"Du nouveau chez les Šakkanakkus de Mari: nouvelles lectures des empreintes ME64, ME196, et ME14","authors":"L. Colonna d’Istria","doi":"10.1086/709306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709306","url":null,"abstract":"Cylinder seal impressions rank highly among the epigraphic sources concerning the šakkanakkus (rulers) of Mari, especially those that reigned during the 20th and first part of 19th centuries BCE, that is the final phase of the šakkanakku period that preceded the reign of Yaḫdun-Lîm in Mari ca. 1820/1810 BC. New readings of the seal impressions ME64+ME196 and ME14 indicate that they all belong to the same cylinder seal belonging to a ruler named Tīnīn-Dagan, whose father was Iddin-Dagan. Both rulers were previously unknown.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"35 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709306","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41895879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Yale Babylonian Collection contains a partial cylinder, NBC 2511, that preserves a hitherto unknown example of Esarhaddon’s Uruk B inscription. While this exemplar does not deviate in translation from those already published in RINAP 4, there are some orthographic variations. This article presents an edition of NBC 2511 with some comments regarding its differences from the published exemplars and its parallels with other Esarhaddon Uruk cylinders.
{"title":"Another Exemplar of Esarhaddon’s Uruk B Cylinder (NBC 2511)","authors":"Shana Zaia","doi":"10.1086/703858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/703858","url":null,"abstract":"The Yale Babylonian Collection contains a partial cylinder, NBC 2511, that preserves a hitherto unknown example of Esarhaddon’s Uruk B inscription. While this exemplar does not deviate in translation from those already published in RINAP 4, there are some orthographic variations. This article presents an edition of NBC 2511 with some comments regarding its differences from the published exemplars and its parallels with other Esarhaddon Uruk cylinders.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"153 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/703858","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45012672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper offers a new edition of the Middle Babylonian bilingual fragment VS 17, 43 (VAT 1514) together with the duplicate lines found on the obverse of the Kassite period exercise tablet CBS 7884. The text is of historical-literary content and depicts an otherwise unknown uprising at Karkar. A first edition of the text is offered together with a brief introduction regarding its problematic historical setting.
{"title":"An Uprising at Karkar: A New Historical-Literary Text","authors":"Elyze Zomer","doi":"10.1086/703855","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/703855","url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a new edition of the Middle Babylonian bilingual fragment VS 17, 43 (VAT 1514) together with the duplicate lines found on the obverse of the Kassite period exercise tablet CBS 7884. The text is of historical-literary content and depicts an otherwise unknown uprising at Karkar. A first edition of the text is offered together with a brief introduction regarding its problematic historical setting.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"111 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/703855","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48046737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ce volume très attendu représente „the conclusion of a task that has taken more than half a century“ (p. xii). Après des „acknowledgements“ (p. vii), où sont mentionnés les auteurs des copies (dans l’ordre décroissant: 32 de William W. Hallo et H. T. Vedeler conjointement1, 18 de Ferris J. Stephens, 8 de H. T. Vedeler seul, 5 de Shin T. Kang, 4 de Daniel D. Reisman et une de Nicole Brisch, Mark E. Cohen, Tikvah Frymer-Kensky, William W. Hallo seul et Mark Van De Mieroop), suit une introduction de Benjamin R. Foster (pp. ix–x), qui retrace succinctement l’histoire de l’ouvrage. Entrepris dans les années soixante par Hallo, il n’était pas encore achevé à la mort de celui-ci en 2015. C’est grâce aux efforts de Ulla Kasten et de Mark E. Cohen qu’il a pu être mené à terme et publié. Dans une brève introduction, Hallo évoque lui aussi la genèse du projet et souligne le rôle important qu’y ont joué tant son prédécesseur Stephens que ses collaborateurs. Le catalogue (pp. xiii–xxi) est quelque peu sommaire, et la littérature secondaire parfois assez lacunaire2. Suite à deux concordances (Museum Number — Text Number et réciproquement) (pp. xxiii–xxiv), le lecteur trouvera les autographies de 72 textes (pl. I–CII). Les compositions représentées sont des hymnes, royaux et divins (1–33), des lettres aux dieux (34–38), des lettres littéraires, le plus souvent entre le souverain et ses hauts fonctionnaires (39–51), la Lamentation sur Ur (52–53), Diĝir pa e3-a (54), deux textes non identifiés en emesal (55–56), La Malédiction d’Agadé (57–59), l’Hymne à la houe (60–62), l’Hymne à Keš (63–65) et quelques inscriptions (66–72). Dans leur grande majorité, ces textes étaient déjà connus par des translittérations (le plus souvent de Hallo ou de Delnero [2006]), mais il a des exceptions, les plus importantes étant les nos 11 (Šulgi B)3, 12–13 (Šulgi E) et 49 (SEpM 7, X25). La qualité des copies est assez variable. Seules celles de Stephens semblent “au-dessus de tout soupçon”; en ce qui concerne les autres, il est, en l’absence de photos, le plus souvent difficile de juger de leur qualité. S’il existe des photos (par exemple dans le cas de CKU ou de la Malédiction d’Agadé), les copies ne se révèlent pas toujours très fiables, avant tout dans le rendement des signes partiellement cassés. Dans les pages qui suivent, le lecteur trouvera une brève discussion de la plupart des textes de YOS 22, à savoir d’une part de ceux déjà translittérés ou utilisés dans la reconstruction d’une composition donnée (par ex. par Hallo ou par Delnero [2006]), de l’autre des nouveaux duplicats de compositions connues.
这本备受期待的书代表了“一项历时半个多世纪的任务的结论”（第十二页）。在“确认”（第七页）之后，提到了副本的作者（按降序排列：32由威廉·W·哈洛和H·T·韦德勒合著，1 18由费里斯·J·斯蒂芬斯合著，8由H·T·韦德勒合著，5由辛·T·康合著，4由丹尼尔·D·赖斯曼合著，1由妮可·布里希、马克·E·科恩、蒂克瓦·弗莱默·肯斯基、威廉·W。Hallo seul和Mark van de Mieroop）遵循本杰明·R·福斯特（Benjamin R.Foster）的介绍（第九至第十页），简要回顾了这本书的历史。60年代由哈洛开始，2015年他去世时尚未完成。多亏了乌拉·卡斯滕和马克·E·科恩的努力，它得以完成并出版。在简短的介绍中，哈洛还讨论了该项目的起源，并强调了他的前任斯蒂芬斯和他的合作者在该项目中发挥的重要作用。目录（第十三至二十一页）有些粗略，次要文献有时相当不完整。在两次匹配（博物馆编号-文本编号和反之亦然）（第XXIII-XXIV页）之后，读者将找到72个文本的签名（第I-CII页）。所描绘的作品包括《皇家和神圣赞美诗》（1-33）、《致众神的信》（34-38）、《文学书信》，最常见的是君主和他的高级官员之间的书信（39-51）、《乌尔哀歌》（52-53）、《迪尔·帕·埃3-a》（54）、《埃梅萨尔的两个未识别文本》（55-56）、《阿加德的诅咒》（57-59）、《锄头赞美诗》（60-62）、《凯什赞美诗》（63-65）和一些铭文（66-72）。这些文本中的绝大多数已经通过音译（最常见的是Hallo或Delnero[2006]）而为人所知，但也有例外，最重要的是第11号（Šulgi B）、第3号、第12-13号（Šulgi E）和第49号（Sepm 7，x25）。副本的质量变化很大。只有斯蒂芬斯的那些似乎“毫无疑问”；至于其他人，在没有照片的情况下，通常很难判断他们的质量。如果有照片（例如，在CKU或阿加德诅咒的情况下），副本并不总是非常可靠，尤其是在部分破损迹象的表现方面。在接下来的几页中，读者将发现对Yos 22的大部分文本的简要讨论，即已经音译或用于重建给定作品的文本（如Hallo或Delnero[2006]），以及已知作品的新副本。
{"title":"Critical Review","authors":"P. Attinger","doi":"10.1086/703861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/703861","url":null,"abstract":"Ce volume très attendu représente „the conclusion of a task that has taken more than half a century“ (p. xii). Après des „acknowledgements“ (p. vii), où sont mentionnés les auteurs des copies (dans l’ordre décroissant: 32 de William W. Hallo et H. T. Vedeler conjointement1, 18 de Ferris J. Stephens, 8 de H. T. Vedeler seul, 5 de Shin T. Kang, 4 de Daniel D. Reisman et une de Nicole Brisch, Mark E. Cohen, Tikvah Frymer-Kensky, William W. Hallo seul et Mark Van De Mieroop), suit une introduction de Benjamin R. Foster (pp. ix–x), qui retrace succinctement l’histoire de l’ouvrage. Entrepris dans les années soixante par Hallo, il n’était pas encore achevé à la mort de celui-ci en 2015. C’est grâce aux efforts de Ulla Kasten et de Mark E. Cohen qu’il a pu être mené à terme et publié. Dans une brève introduction, Hallo évoque lui aussi la genèse du projet et souligne le rôle important qu’y ont joué tant son prédécesseur Stephens que ses collaborateurs. Le catalogue (pp. xiii–xxi) est quelque peu sommaire, et la littérature secondaire parfois assez lacunaire2. Suite à deux concordances (Museum Number — Text Number et réciproquement) (pp. xxiii–xxiv), le lecteur trouvera les autographies de 72 textes (pl. I–CII). Les compositions représentées sont des hymnes, royaux et divins (1–33), des lettres aux dieux (34–38), des lettres littéraires, le plus souvent entre le souverain et ses hauts fonctionnaires (39–51), la Lamentation sur Ur (52–53), Diĝir pa e3-a (54), deux textes non identifiés en emesal (55–56), La Malédiction d’Agadé (57–59), l’Hymne à la houe (60–62), l’Hymne à Keš (63–65) et quelques inscriptions (66–72). Dans leur grande majorité, ces textes étaient déjà connus par des translittérations (le plus souvent de Hallo ou de Delnero [2006]), mais il a des exceptions, les plus importantes étant les nos 11 (Šulgi B)3, 12–13 (Šulgi E) et 49 (SEpM 7, X25). La qualité des copies est assez variable. Seules celles de Stephens semblent “au-dessus de tout soupçon”; en ce qui concerne les autres, il est, en l’absence de photos, le plus souvent difficile de juger de leur qualité. S’il existe des photos (par exemple dans le cas de CKU ou de la Malédiction d’Agadé), les copies ne se révèlent pas toujours très fiables, avant tout dans le rendement des signes partiellement cassés. Dans les pages qui suivent, le lecteur trouvera une brève discussion de la plupart des textes de YOS 22, à savoir d’une part de ceux déjà translittérés ou utilisés dans la reconstruction d’une composition donnée (par ex. par Hallo ou par Delnero [2006]), de l’autre des nouveaux duplicats de compositions connues.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"191 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/703861","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41461875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article presents editions of two maššartu lists from the Eanna-temple in Uruk now housed in the Yale Babylonian Collection and in the Princeton Theological Seminary. Not only are NCBT 660 and PTS 2232 among the very few completely preserved examples of such lists, they also belong to the earliest known specimens of their genre, dating to the third (602/1 BCE) and first (604/3 BCE) year of Nebuchadnezzar II. These texts are valuable additions to the rather sparse dossier containing information on the Eanna cult during the formative phase of the Neo-Babylonian Empire; moreover, they are related to a text that concerns Nabonidus’s cultic reforms in the Eanna.
{"title":"An Early Maššartu-List from the Eanna Temple in Uruk","authors":"R. Pirngruber","doi":"10.1086/703860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/703860","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents editions of two maššartu lists from the Eanna-temple in Uruk now housed in the Yale Babylonian Collection and in the Princeton Theological Seminary. Not only are NCBT 660 and PTS 2232 among the very few completely preserved examples of such lists, they also belong to the earliest known specimens of their genre, dating to the third (602/1 BCE) and first (604/3 BCE) year of Nebuchadnezzar II. These texts are valuable additions to the rather sparse dossier containing information on the Eanna cult during the formative phase of the Neo-Babylonian Empire; moreover, they are related to a text that concerns Nabonidus’s cultic reforms in the Eanna.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"181 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/703860","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42090395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：