首页 > 最新文献

New Review of Academic Librarianship最新文献

英文 中文
The University Library: Places for Possibility 大学图书馆:充满可能性的地方
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-04-08 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1906718
Patrick ODonnell, L. Anderson
Abstract University libraries are constituted in the literature by a range of overlapping and shifting conceptual models that are deployed to capture, express and legitimise their repurposing, progressive status and function within the university campus. Over the last two decades university libraries have been increasingly characterised as highly responsive and receptive to the fast-moving currents of technological innovation, and emergent teaching and learning paradigms. This paper charts and discusses the evolutionary trajectory of the university library set within an historical context, exploring the discursive influences that have both stimulated and propagated what might be described as progressive transformation. The paper seeks to portray and unpack the Zeitgeist of the academic library that has been cultivated in contemporary times; positioning the university library against a backdrop of global developments that have shaped the university sector from the early 1990s, and offering a macro-level exploration of the increasing status of the university library.
摘要大学图书馆在文献中由一系列重叠和变化的概念模型组成,这些模型被用来捕捉、表达和合法化它们在大学校园内的重新利用、进步地位和功能。在过去的二十年里,大学图书馆越来越被描述为高度响应和接受快速发展的技术创新潮流以及新兴的教学模式。本文绘制并讨论了大学图书馆在历史背景下的演变轨迹,探讨了话语影响,这些影响既刺激又传播了所谓的渐进式转变。本文试图刻画和解读当代高校图书馆所培育的时代精神;将大学图书馆定位在20世纪90年代初塑造大学部门的全球发展背景下,并对大学图书馆日益增长的地位进行宏观层面的探索。
{"title":"The University Library: Places for Possibility","authors":"Patrick ODonnell, L. Anderson","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1906718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1906718","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract University libraries are constituted in the literature by a range of overlapping and shifting conceptual models that are deployed to capture, express and legitimise their repurposing, progressive status and function within the university campus. Over the last two decades university libraries have been increasingly characterised as highly responsive and receptive to the fast-moving currents of technological innovation, and emergent teaching and learning paradigms. This paper charts and discusses the evolutionary trajectory of the university library set within an historical context, exploring the discursive influences that have both stimulated and propagated what might be described as progressive transformation. The paper seeks to portray and unpack the Zeitgeist of the academic library that has been cultivated in contemporary times; positioning the university library against a backdrop of global developments that have shaped the university sector from the early 1990s, and offering a macro-level exploration of the increasing status of the university library.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2021.1906718","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44523955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Transforming academic library operations in Africa with artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges: A review paper 用人工智能改变非洲学术图书馆的运作:机遇与挑战:一篇综述论文
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1906715
A. Echedom, Omorodion Okuonghae
Abstract This paper focuses on the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic library operations. In the quest to render fast, effective and efficient services, academic libraries have adopted different technologies in the past. Artificial intelligence technologies is the latest among the technologies currently being introduced in libraries. The technology which is considered an intelligent system, come in the form of robots and expert systems which have natural language processing, machine learning and pattern recognition capabilities. This paper examined the features of AI, the application of AI to library operations, examples of academic libraries with AI technologies in Sub-Saharan Africa, the need for AI in libraries and the challenges associated with the adoption of AI in libraries. The study concluded that AI holds a lot of prospects for the improvement of information services delivery in African academic libraries. Consequently, its adoption is a sinequanon to delivering robust library services in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR).
摘要本文重点讨论了在学术图书馆运营中使用人工智能的机遇和挑战。为了提供快速、有效和高效的服务,过去学术图书馆采用了不同的技术。人工智能技术是目前图书馆引入的最新技术。这项被认为是智能系统的技术以机器人和专家系统的形式出现,它们具有自然语言处理、机器学习和模式识别能力。本文研究了人工智能的特点、人工智能在图书馆运营中的应用、撒哈拉以南非洲采用人工智能技术的学术图书馆的例子、图书馆对人工智能的需求以及图书馆采用人工智能的挑战。该研究得出的结论是,人工智能在改善非洲学术图书馆的信息服务方面有很大的前景。因此,它的采用是在第四次工业革命(4IR)中提供强大的图书馆服务的一个助力。
{"title":"Transforming academic library operations in Africa with artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges: A review paper","authors":"A. Echedom, Omorodion Okuonghae","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1906715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1906715","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper focuses on the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic library operations. In the quest to render fast, effective and efficient services, academic libraries have adopted different technologies in the past. Artificial intelligence technologies is the latest among the technologies currently being introduced in libraries. The technology which is considered an intelligent system, come in the form of robots and expert systems which have natural language processing, machine learning and pattern recognition capabilities. This paper examined the features of AI, the application of AI to library operations, examples of academic libraries with AI technologies in Sub-Saharan Africa, the need for AI in libraries and the challenges associated with the adoption of AI in libraries. The study concluded that AI holds a lot of prospects for the improvement of information services delivery in African academic libraries. Consequently, its adoption is a sinequanon to delivering robust library services in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR).","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2021.1906715","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49388718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Academic Librarian Perceptions of Academic Librarians: Building a Foundation of Shared Understanding 学术图书馆员对学术图书馆员的看法:建立共同理解的基础
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2020.1765817
J. Fagan, Hillary Ostermiller, Elizabeth Price, L. Sapp
Abstract A survey concerning perceptions of academic librarians was conducted at a large, 4-year university with three populations: librarians, faculty, and undergraduate students. The high response rate and the use of an instrument based on previous studies offers the possibility of longitudinal comparison and the identification of relationships between groups within one environment. This article focuses specifically on academic librarian perceptions about what librarians know (expertise and skills), what librarians do (roles and duties), and what librarians are like (motivations and affective behaviors). Twenty librarians employed in James Madison University Libraries responded to an online survey (62.5% response rate); four follow-up interviews and card sorts were conducted later to provide context to the data. Results have implications for libraries specifically in the areas of outreach, instruction, management, and collaboration. Differences in the responses of liaison and nonliaison groups are not generalizable to the population, but patterns were found that suggest future research in this area should include examination of differences related to the type of librarianship or focus on specific aspects of librarianship. Subsequent articles will situate these findings with those from surveys of faculty and undergraduate students and discuss implications for practice.
摘要:本研究在一所四年制大学进行了一项关于学术图书馆员观念的调查,调查对象包括图书馆员、教职员工和本科生。高回复率和基于先前研究的工具的使用提供了纵向比较和确定一个环境中群体之间关系的可能性。本文特别关注学术图书馆员对图书馆员所知道的(专业知识和技能)、图书馆员所做的(角色和职责)以及图书馆员是什么样的(动机和情感行为)的看法。詹姆斯麦迪逊大学图书馆的20名图书馆员参与了一项在线调查(回复率为62.5%);随后进行了四次后续访谈和卡片分类,以提供数据的背景。研究结果对图书馆在拓展、教学、管理和协作等方面具有重要意义。联络小组和非联络小组在回应上的差异并不能推广到人群中,但研究发现的模式表明,未来在这一领域的研究应包括对与图书馆事业类型相关的差异的研究,或将重点放在图书馆事业的具体方面。随后的文章将把这些发现与对教师和本科生的调查结果结合起来,并讨论对实践的影响。
{"title":"Academic Librarian Perceptions of Academic Librarians: Building a Foundation of Shared Understanding","authors":"J. Fagan, Hillary Ostermiller, Elizabeth Price, L. Sapp","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1765817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1765817","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A survey concerning perceptions of academic librarians was conducted at a large, 4-year university with three populations: librarians, faculty, and undergraduate students. The high response rate and the use of an instrument based on previous studies offers the possibility of longitudinal comparison and the identification of relationships between groups within one environment. This article focuses specifically on academic librarian perceptions about what librarians know (expertise and skills), what librarians do (roles and duties), and what librarians are like (motivations and affective behaviors). Twenty librarians employed in James Madison University Libraries responded to an online survey (62.5% response rate); four follow-up interviews and card sorts were conducted later to provide context to the data. Results have implications for libraries specifically in the areas of outreach, instruction, management, and collaboration. Differences in the responses of liaison and nonliaison groups are not generalizable to the population, but patterns were found that suggest future research in this area should include examination of differences related to the type of librarianship or focus on specific aspects of librarianship. Subsequent articles will situate these findings with those from surveys of faculty and undergraduate students and discuss implications for practice.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1765817","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43532938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Editorial – Academic Librarians and Engaging with Scholarship 社论-学术图书馆员和参与奖学金
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1944747
L. Appleton
{"title":"Editorial – Academic Librarians and Engaging with Scholarship","authors":"L. Appleton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1944747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1944747","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2021.1944747","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49622985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Editorial for New Review of Academic Librarianship (1) 2021 《学术图书馆学新评论》社论(1)2021
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1913884
G. Walton, L. Appleton
{"title":"Editorial for New Review of Academic Librarianship (1) 2021","authors":"G. Walton, L. Appleton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1913884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1913884","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2021.1913884","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48041150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Faculty Perceptions of Academic Librarians: Experts, Connectors, and Resource Stewards 教师对高校图书馆员的看法:专家、连接者和资源管理员
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2020-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2020.1819354
J. Fagan, Hillary Ostermiller, Elizabeth Price, L. Sapp
Abstract A survey concerning perceptions of academic librarians was conducted at a large, 4-year university with three populations: librarians, faculty, and undergraduate students. This paper presents results from the faculty population, with comparison to the librarian sample. The major research questions address perceptions about what librarians know (expertise and skills), what librarians do (role and duties), and what librarians are like (motivations and affective characteristics). Results showed faculty perceptions to be more in-line overall with librarians’ perceptions of themselves than the literature might otherwise indicate, at least in domains where the faculty are actively engaged. Faculty also identified a role not explicitly mentioned on the survey: that of librarians as conduits between students and faculty. Gaps between librarian and faculty perceptions still exist relating to the extraordinary extent and diversity of librarian knowledge, skills, duties, and capacities, and with respect to the extent of librarians teaching. The study points to an ongoing need for marketing of library services and continued demonstration of library value.
摘要一项关于学术图书馆员认知的调查是在一所四年制的大型大学进行的,该大学有三个群体:图书馆员、教员和本科生。本文介绍了教师群体的结果,并与图书馆员样本进行了比较。主要的研究问题涉及对图书馆员所知道的(专业知识和技能)、图书馆员所做的(角色和职责)以及图书馆员是什么样的(动机和情感特征)的看法。结果表明,与文献可能表明的情况相比,教员的看法与图书馆员对自己的看法更为一致,至少在教员积极参与的领域是这样。学院还确定了一个调查中没有明确提及的角色:图书馆员是学生和学院之间的沟通渠道。在图书馆员知识、技能、职责和能力的非凡程度和多样性方面,以及在图书馆员教学的程度方面,图书馆员和教师之间的看法仍然存在差距。该研究指出,图书馆服务的营销和图书馆价值的持续展示是一种持续的需求。
{"title":"Faculty Perceptions of Academic Librarians: Experts, Connectors, and Resource Stewards","authors":"J. Fagan, Hillary Ostermiller, Elizabeth Price, L. Sapp","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1819354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1819354","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A survey concerning perceptions of academic librarians was conducted at a large, 4-year university with three populations: librarians, faculty, and undergraduate students. This paper presents results from the faculty population, with comparison to the librarian sample. The major research questions address perceptions about what librarians know (expertise and skills), what librarians do (role and duties), and what librarians are like (motivations and affective characteristics). Results showed faculty perceptions to be more in-line overall with librarians’ perceptions of themselves than the literature might otherwise indicate, at least in domains where the faculty are actively engaged. Faculty also identified a role not explicitly mentioned on the survey: that of librarians as conduits between students and faculty. Gaps between librarian and faculty perceptions still exist relating to the extraordinary extent and diversity of librarian knowledge, skills, duties, and capacities, and with respect to the extent of librarians teaching. The study points to an ongoing need for marketing of library services and continued demonstration of library value.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1819354","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45148112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Academic Libraries and Student Engagement: A Literature Review 高校图书馆与学生参与:文献综述
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2020.1784762
L. Appleton
Abstract The term ‘student engagement’ has a broad meaning and is used freely as an expression in several different contexts of academic librarianship. This literature review covers scholarship from across several of these areas and is structured so that four broad themes are systematically addressed: student engagement in learning; students as partners; student voice; methods and techniques for student engagement. The granular review of the literature reveals many sub-discussions about a range of academic librarianship topics and provides some discussion about how they cross over into the area of student engagement. The literature covers different innovations, techniques and strategies for student engagement, and the review illustrates how many techniques and tools are transferable across the different intentions and objectives of student engagement. The review concludes that many academic librarians are very proactive in student engagement activities and that student engagement itself has become a fundamental element of academic library management.
“学生参与”一词具有广泛的含义,在学术图书馆工作的几个不同背景下自由使用。这篇文献综述涵盖了这些领域的学术研究,其结构是为了系统地解决四个广泛的主题:学生参与学习;学生作为合作伙伴;学生的声音;学生参与的方法和技巧。对文献的详细回顾揭示了许多关于学术图书馆主题的子讨论,并提供了一些关于它们如何跨越到学生参与领域的讨论。文献涵盖了学生参与的不同创新、技术和策略,综述说明了在学生参与的不同意图和目标之间有多少技术和工具是可转移的。这篇综述的结论是,许多学术图书馆员在学生参与活动中非常积极主动,学生参与本身已经成为学术图书馆管理的一个基本要素。
{"title":"Academic Libraries and Student Engagement: A Literature Review","authors":"L. Appleton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1784762","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784762","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The term ‘student engagement’ has a broad meaning and is used freely as an expression in several different contexts of academic librarianship. This literature review covers scholarship from across several of these areas and is structured so that four broad themes are systematically addressed: student engagement in learning; students as partners; student voice; methods and techniques for student engagement. The granular review of the literature reveals many sub-discussions about a range of academic librarianship topics and provides some discussion about how they cross over into the area of student engagement. The literature covers different innovations, techniques and strategies for student engagement, and the review illustrates how many techniques and tools are transferable across the different intentions and objectives of student engagement. The review concludes that many academic librarians are very proactive in student engagement activities and that student engagement itself has become a fundamental element of academic library management.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784762","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47249642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Engaging Students and Academics in Creating a New Model for Research Libraries: A Reflective Case Study on the UCL Student Centre 让学生和学术界参与创建研究型图书馆的新模式——对伦敦大学学院学生中心的反思性案例研究
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2020.1779761
Benjamin Meunier
Abstract The paper will explore how the UCL Student Centre, opened in 2019, responds to the emphasis on ‘research-based education’ in the UCL Education Strategy. It discusses the high levels of engagement at different levels, which characterised the design of the building, and how services and spaces were designed around student needs. The paper will aim to provide insights on both successful characteristics and lessons learned from the construction and first year of operation of the Student Centre, to benefit library staff and designers in planning, designing and operating research library spaces. The article will also consider how the building provides a showcase for the talent and creativity of the diverse staff and student community of the university.The building has elicited a strong emotional response from students, creating a stronger sense of belonging to the UCL community and encouraging students’ pro-active approach to learning.
摘要本文将探讨2019年开放的伦敦大学学院学生中心如何回应伦敦大学学院教育战略中对“研究性教育”的强调。它讨论了不同层次的高参与度,这是建筑设计的特点,以及如何围绕学生需求设计服务和空间。该论文旨在深入了解学生中心的成功特点以及从建设和第一年运营中吸取的经验教训,使图书馆工作人员和设计师在规划、设计和运营研究图书馆空间方面受益。文章还将考虑该建筑如何展示大学不同教职员工和学生群体的才华和创造力。该建筑引起了学生们强烈的情感反应,创造了对伦敦大学学院社区更强的归属感,并鼓励学生积极主动地学习。
{"title":"Engaging Students and Academics in Creating a New Model for Research Libraries: A Reflective Case Study on the UCL Student Centre","authors":"Benjamin Meunier","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1779761","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1779761","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper will explore how the UCL Student Centre, opened in 2019, responds to the emphasis on ‘research-based education’ in the UCL Education Strategy. It discusses the high levels of engagement at different levels, which characterised the design of the building, and how services and spaces were designed around student needs. The paper will aim to provide insights on both successful characteristics and lessons learned from the construction and first year of operation of the Student Centre, to benefit library staff and designers in planning, designing and operating research library spaces. The article will also consider how the building provides a showcase for the talent and creativity of the diverse staff and student community of the university.The building has elicited a strong emotional response from students, creating a stronger sense of belonging to the UCL community and encouraging students’ pro-active approach to learning.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1779761","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49616288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Themed Issue 以编辑为主题的问题
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2020.1830243
Olaf Eigenbrodt, Karen Latimer
{"title":"Editorial Themed Issue","authors":"Olaf Eigenbrodt, Karen Latimer","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1830243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1830243","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1830243","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45277649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utilising an Appreciative Inquiry and Context Personalisation Design: A New Model for Library Student Workers 利用欣赏性探究和情境个性化设计:图书馆学生工作者的新模式
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2020.1830244
T. Jewell Beckett, O. Murphy
Abstract Academic libraries have long employed student workers to assist with routine tasks, creating beneficial outcomes for both the student and the library. Traditionally, these tasks primarily consisted of checking in/out materials, shelving books, and monitoring the library; however, libraries have also started allowing students to assist in a peer-reference capacity. This article details how academic libraries can create a major aligned, student-centric, and personalised student worker program. This approach is a significant change from the task-oriented, library-centric design that is currently used in many academic settings. This case study describes how an academic library can work with student workers, employed, and voluntary, who from the initial interview, are provided with an individualised program design, library instruction, and mentoring while contributing to the greater mission and vision of the library.
摘要学术图书馆长期以来一直雇佣学生工作者协助完成日常任务,为学生和图书馆创造了有益的成果。传统上,这些任务主要包括检查材料、上架书籍和监控图书馆;然而,图书馆也开始允许学生在同行参考能力方面提供帮助。本文详细介绍了学术图书馆如何创建一个专业一致、以学生为中心、个性化的学生工作者计划。这种方法与目前在许多学术环境中使用的以任务为导向、以图书馆为中心的设计相比是一个重大变化。本案例研究描述了学术图书馆如何与受雇和自愿的学生工作者合作,他们从最初的面试开始就获得个性化的课程设计、图书馆指导和指导,同时为图书馆的更大使命和愿景做出贡献。
{"title":"Utilising an Appreciative Inquiry and Context Personalisation Design: A New Model for Library Student Workers","authors":"T. Jewell Beckett, O. Murphy","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1830244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1830244","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Academic libraries have long employed student workers to assist with routine tasks, creating beneficial outcomes for both the student and the library. Traditionally, these tasks primarily consisted of checking in/out materials, shelving books, and monitoring the library; however, libraries have also started allowing students to assist in a peer-reference capacity. This article details how academic libraries can create a major aligned, student-centric, and personalised student worker program. This approach is a significant change from the task-oriented, library-centric design that is currently used in many academic settings. This case study describes how an academic library can work with student workers, employed, and voluntary, who from the initial interview, are provided with an individualised program design, library instruction, and mentoring while contributing to the greater mission and vision of the library.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1830244","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48839600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1