Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53197
E. Esposito
The subject, currently so hot, of social memory, leads to the theme of social oblivion. The problem is that forgetting is a difficult and controversial issue. Trying to forget represents a paradox difficult to sneak away, since every effort to do so, inexorably confronts itself. However, for autological systems, colliding with themselves is a habitual phenomenon, which is why forgetting becomes a normal operation, even necessary for the functioning of social memory. The only condition for oblivion to operate, avoiding overloading the memory, is that this operation remains unnoticed. The memory does not remember the past (that would not be useful and would only serve to overload the system) but rebuild it at every op¬portunity based on a future projected in a new way. Traditionally, it has been thought that the support of social memory lies in the psychic substratum, since social memory is found in the memories that are shared by all members of society, leaving aside only the strictly intimate memories of each one. Systems theory, on the contrary, maintains that the support of social memory cannot be found outside the system which remembers, but in the structures of it. From the invention of writing onward, social memory rests on the means of transmission of communications and, in our time, increasingly on the mass media.
{"title":"Olvido social: una aproximación desde la teoría de sistemas","authors":"E. Esposito","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53197","url":null,"abstract":"The subject, currently so hot, of social memory, leads to the theme of social oblivion. The problem is that forgetting is a difficult and controversial issue. Trying to forget represents a paradox difficult to sneak away, since every effort to do so, inexorably confronts itself. However, for autological systems, colliding with themselves is a habitual phenomenon, which is why forgetting becomes a normal operation, even necessary for the functioning of social memory. The only condition for oblivion to operate, avoiding overloading the memory, is that this operation remains unnoticed. The memory does not remember the past (that would not be useful and would only serve to overload the system) but rebuild it at every op¬portunity based on a future projected in a new way. Traditionally, it has been thought that the support of social memory lies in the psychic substratum, since social memory is found in the memories that are shared by all members of society, leaving aside only the strictly intimate memories of each one. Systems theory, on the contrary, maintains that the support of social memory cannot be found outside the system which remembers, but in the structures of it. From the invention of writing onward, social memory rests on the means of transmission of communications and, in our time, increasingly on the mass media.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71131890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53289
R. Gascón
El presente trabajo corresponde a una entrevista realizada al sociologo aleman Gunther Teubner. En ella, los autores abordan aspectos vinculados a las consecuencias de la diferenciacion funcional, el rol de las constituciones en el ambito empresarial y las constribuciones de la sociologia constitucional al estudio del constitucionalismo contemporaneo. Gunther Teubner es profesor emerito de derecho privado y sociologia del derecho en la prestigiosa Universidad Goethe de Francfort del Meno. Continuador de la obra de Niklas Luhmann, el trabajo del profesor Teubner es ampliamente reconocido por sus contribuciones en el campo de la sociologia del derecho, particularmente a traves de su teoria del derecho autopoietico, la nocion de derecho reflexivo y su teoria del constitucionalismo social.
{"title":"Diferenciación funcional y constitucionalización social: una conversación con Gunther Teubner","authors":"R. Gascón","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53289","url":null,"abstract":"El presente trabajo corresponde a una entrevista realizada al sociologo aleman Gunther Teubner. En ella, los autores abordan aspectos vinculados a las consecuencias de la diferenciacion funcional, el rol de las constituciones en el ambito empresarial y las constribuciones de la sociologia constitucional al estudio del constitucionalismo contemporaneo. Gunther Teubner es profesor emerito de derecho privado y sociologia del derecho en la prestigiosa Universidad Goethe de Francfort del Meno. Continuador de la obra de Niklas Luhmann, el trabajo del profesor Teubner es ampliamente reconocido por sus contribuciones en el campo de la sociologia del derecho, particularmente a traves de su teoria del derecho autopoietico, la nocion de derecho reflexivo y su teoria del constitucionalismo social.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71132363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53283
C. Amigo, Julio Labraña, J. Cortés, E. Gómez, J. Moreno, María Catalina Muñoz
As a result of the multiple ecological problems affecting contemporary society, environmental education has become increasingly important in recent decades. However, despite its importance, this concern does not seem to have gone hand in hand with the consideration of environmental education within the framework of a complex enought sociological theory. As we will argue in this article, this has had im¬portant effects in the conceptualization of environmental education, which is hence generally described as a process of ethical socialization with the aim of improving society. Using the distinctions of Luh¬mann's social systems theory of social systems between a) psychic and social systems and b) different functional systems, we will propose an understanding of environmental education as an intentional effort to socialize about the relationship between society and its physical environment, which, as part of the communications of a specialized system, reflect society's form of differentiation. Once this definition is proposed, we will propose a model of environmental education for a functionally differentiated society, taking Chile as example. The article closes with a summary, future lines of research and policy recom¬mendations.
{"title":"Hacia una educación ambiental para una sociedad compleja. Un análisis desde la teoría de sistemas sociales","authors":"C. Amigo, Julio Labraña, J. Cortés, E. Gómez, J. Moreno, María Catalina Muñoz","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53283","url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the multiple ecological problems affecting contemporary society, environmental education has become increasingly important in recent decades. However, despite its importance, this concern does not seem to have gone hand in hand with the consideration of environmental education within the framework of a complex enought sociological theory. As we will argue in this article, this has had im¬portant effects in the conceptualization of environmental education, which is hence generally described as a process of ethical socialization with the aim of improving society. Using the distinctions of Luh¬mann's social systems theory of social systems between a) psychic and social systems and b) different functional systems, we will propose an understanding of environmental education as an intentional effort to socialize about the relationship between society and its physical environment, which, as part of the communications of a specialized system, reflect society's form of differentiation. Once this definition is proposed, we will propose a model of environmental education for a functionally differentiated society, taking Chile as example. The article closes with a summary, future lines of research and policy recom¬mendations.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71132063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53287
E. Costa
Since the emergence of sociology as a discipline of scientific knowledge, education presents itself as one of the main objects of investigation of sociological thought. This article, precisely, has as main objective to construct a theoretical reflection about the education within the framework of the functionalist sociological tradition. More precisely, the article develops a comparative analysis of the ideas of three eminent sociologists - Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann - in order to demonstrate how each of them conceives education.
{"title":"A educação na tradição sociológica funcionalista: uma análise comparativa entre em Durkheim, Parsons e Luhmann","authors":"E. Costa","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53287","url":null,"abstract":"Since the emergence of sociology as a discipline of scientific knowledge, education presents itself as one of the main objects of investigation of sociological thought. This article, precisely, has as main objective to construct a theoretical reflection about the education within the framework of the functionalist sociological tradition. More precisely, the article develops a comparative analysis of the ideas of three eminent sociologists - Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann - in order to demonstrate how each of them conceives education.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71132260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53284
S. Ocampo
Este trabajo presenta, reconstruye y reformula el concepto de autosimplificacion de sistemas sociales de la Teoria General de Sistemas Sociales de Niklas Luhmann. Para su presentacion exponemos el problema fundamental de la autodescripcion de sistemas complejos y el aporte de la Hierarchy Theory mediante el concepto pionero de autosimplificacion. Para su reconstruccion identificamos la red teorica que Luhmann elaboro entre los conceptos de autosimplificacion, accion y presentacion de si y analizamos, primero, la evolucion de estos elementos hasta llegar a Sistemas sociales, y segundo su relacion sustantiva con la comunicacion basada en su orientacion funcional al problema de la autodescripcion de sistemas sociales. Para su reformulacion presentamos dos hipotesis de trabajo. La primera es una hipotesis critica que pone en cuestion la formulacion original de Luhmann debido a falencias de estrechez, reduccionismo y restrictivo. La segunda es una hipotesis propositiva que sugiere una ampliacion teorica de la autosimplificacion en conexion con la distincion accion/ vivencia y con el esquema de diferenciacion de imputaciones.
{"title":"La comunicación como acción y como vivencia: una reformulación ampliada del concepto de autosimplificación de sistemas sociales de Niklas Luhmann","authors":"S. Ocampo","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2018.53284","url":null,"abstract":"Este trabajo presenta, reconstruye y reformula el concepto de autosimplificacion de sistemas sociales de la Teoria General de Sistemas Sociales de Niklas Luhmann. Para su presentacion exponemos el problema fundamental de la autodescripcion de sistemas complejos y el aporte de la Hierarchy Theory mediante el concepto pionero de autosimplificacion. Para su reconstruccion identificamos la red teorica que Luhmann elaboro entre los conceptos de autosimplificacion, accion y presentacion de si y analizamos, primero, la evolucion de estos elementos hasta llegar a Sistemas sociales, y segundo su relacion sustantiva con la comunicacion basada en su orientacion funcional al problema de la autodescripcion de sistemas sociales. Para su reformulacion presentamos dos hipotesis de trabajo. La primera es una hipotesis critica que pone en cuestion la formulacion original de Luhmann debido a falencias de estrechez, reduccionismo y restrictivo. La segunda es una hipotesis propositiva que sugiere una ampliacion teorica de la autosimplificacion en conexion con la distincion accion/ vivencia y con el esquema de diferenciacion de imputaciones.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71132197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-09-11DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47278
Mauro Basaure
The article asserts that memory plays an intermediary role between political present and history. As political present is intrinsically a matter of dispute, memory transfers this dispute into history by politically attributing cognitive or normative significance to selected events and periods. I argue that four different and potentially controversial forms of memory emerge from this, namely, a positive and a negative cognitive form of memory, on the one hand, and a negative and a positive socio-integrative form, on the other hand. The conflictive link between these forms of memory defines what I call controversies or disputes of memory. By elaborating on different theoretical reflections about the relation between politics, history, and memory, I firstly construe an original framework to analyze disputes of memory and subsequently I apply this to the public controversy between 2007 and 2016 regarding the installation and functioning of the Chilean Museum of Memory and Human Rights. The article concludes that criticisms of political positions concerning the relation between politics and history produce different and colliding forms of cognitive or socio-integrative memory, which creates a fluctuating time trajectory for memory.
{"title":"Hacia una reconstrucción de los conflictos de la memoria. El caso del Museo de la Memoria y los Derechos Humanos en Chile","authors":"Mauro Basaure","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47278","url":null,"abstract":"The article asserts that memory plays an intermediary role between political present and history. As political present is intrinsically a matter of dispute, memory transfers this dispute into history by politically attributing cognitive or normative significance to selected events and periods. I argue that four different and potentially controversial forms of memory emerge from this, namely, a positive and a negative cognitive form of memory, on the one hand, and a negative and a positive socio-integrative form, on the other hand. The conflictive link between these forms of memory defines what I call controversies or disputes of memory. By elaborating on different theoretical reflections about the relation between politics, history, and memory, I firstly construe an original framework to analyze disputes of memory and subsequently I apply this to the public controversy between 2007 and 2016 regarding the installation and functioning of the Chilean Museum of Memory and Human Rights. The article concludes that criticisms of political positions concerning the relation between politics and history produce different and colliding forms of cognitive or socio-integrative memory, which creates a fluctuating time trajectory for memory.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42758657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-09-11DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47279
María Antonieta Urquieta, César Maríñez, C. Jorquera
The article characterize 'territory' as a medium and discuss its analytical advantages to observe socio-spatial complexity. First, we present a conceptual outline for distinction medium/form to analyse social phenomena (I). Then we characterize territory as a medium for the construction of forms, and show the ways in which observers build expectations about what they observe when territory is thematized in communication (II). As conclusion, we discuss the relevance of territory for future researches on social inclusion and exclusion (III).
{"title":"Territorio como medium: Discusión sobre rendimientos analíticos para las observaciones de la complejidad socio-espacial","authors":"María Antonieta Urquieta, César Maríñez, C. Jorquera","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47279","url":null,"abstract":"The article characterize 'territory' as a medium and discuss its analytical advantages to observe socio-spatial complexity. First, we present a conceptual outline for distinction medium/form to analyse social phenomena (I). Then we characterize territory as a medium for the construction of forms, and show the ways in which observers build expectations about what they observe when territory is thematized in communication (II). As conclusion, we discuss the relevance of territory for future researches on social inclusion and exclusion (III).","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41757660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-09-11DOI: 10.5354/RMAD.V0I37.47267
Dirk Baecker
Systemic theories of communication proceed from a deconstruction of Shannon's and Weaver's mathematical theory and transmission model of communication. Referring to the unresolved question of the identity of a message for different observers they instead develop a selection model of communication. In order to overcome the engineering model of signaling (rather than communication) offered by Shannon and Weaver systemic theories drop the assumption of a given set of possible messages any one message is considered to be selected from, and instead assume that the set of possible messages is to be constructed by the participants in communication as much as the single message then to be selected from that constructed set, also known as the context.
{"title":"Teorías sistémicas de la comunicación","authors":"Dirk Baecker","doi":"10.5354/RMAD.V0I37.47267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/RMAD.V0I37.47267","url":null,"abstract":"Systemic theories of communication proceed from a deconstruction of Shannon's and Weaver's mathematical theory and transmission model of communication. Referring to the unresolved question of the identity of a message for different observers they instead develop a selection model of communication. In order to overcome the engineering model of signaling (rather than communication) offered by Shannon and Weaver systemic theories drop the assumption of a given set of possible messages any one message is considered to be selected from, and instead assume that the set of possible messages is to be constructed by the participants in communication as much as the single message then to be selected from that constructed set, also known as the context.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46976399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-09-11DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47276
P. Grande
The term ‘negotiation’ has many uses in academic field including open dynamics and less explicit processes of adjustment. This article suggests that the notion of negotiation has been developed during the second half of the 20th century in two relatively autonomous and distinguishable disciplinary currents. Through the concept of negotiation these currents express the balance between individual freedom and social structure conditioning. Thus, negotiation has been used to show nuances of individual agency in real contexts analyses. This article examines constructs from social theory, economics and game theory to contribute to a better theoretical delimitation of the negotiation concept and its links with agency.
{"title":"La libertad en disputa. Corrientes de la negociación en la teoría social contemporánea","authors":"P. Grande","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47276","url":null,"abstract":"The term ‘negotiation’ has many uses in academic field including open dynamics and less explicit processes of adjustment. This article suggests that the notion of negotiation has been developed during the second half of the 20th century in two relatively autonomous and distinguishable disciplinary currents. Through the concept of negotiation these currents express the balance between individual freedom and social structure conditioning. Thus, negotiation has been used to show nuances of individual agency in real contexts analyses. This article examines constructs from social theory, economics and game theory to contribute to a better theoretical delimitation of the negotiation concept and its links with agency.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45382113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-09-11DOI: 10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47269
Anahí Urquiza, Marco Billi, T. Leal
At least since the XVIII century, the ‘problem of induction’, that is, how to justify the abstractions derived from any empirical observation, has been at the core of a fiery debate both within the philosophy of science, and the praxis of social sciences. Refuting the allegation of ‘empirical closure’ raised against Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory, we claim that it delivers a privileged epistemological and theoretical platform to face such a dilemma, since it highlights the necessary conditions to produce an ‘abductive’ reasoning. By way of discussing, on the one hand, Luhmann’s understanding of knowledge and science, and on the other, diverse attempts to apply empirically the systemic approach and integrate it with other analytical tools, the paper offers a general model to understand the role and relationships of the principles of theoretical plausibility and empirical grounding within social science research. Based on that, the article identifies the criteria of ‘isomorphism’, ‘perspectivism’, transparency’ and ‘iterability’ as indicators of scientific acceptability of a systemic-constructivist research, and offers orientations for the design of such a research.
{"title":"Aplicar una distinción. Un programa sistémico-constructivista para la investigación social cualitativa","authors":"Anahí Urquiza, Marco Billi, T. Leal","doi":"10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2017.47269","url":null,"abstract":"At least since the XVIII century, the ‘problem of induction’, that is, how to justify the abstractions derived from any empirical observation, has been at the core of a fiery debate both within the philosophy of science, and the praxis of social sciences. Refuting the allegation of ‘empirical closure’ raised against Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory, we claim that it delivers a privileged epistemological and theoretical platform to face such a dilemma, since it highlights the necessary conditions to produce an ‘abductive’ reasoning. By way of discussing, on the one hand, Luhmann’s understanding of knowledge and science, and on the other, diverse attempts to apply empirically the systemic approach and integrate it with other analytical tools, the paper offers a general model to understand the role and relationships of the principles of theoretical plausibility and empirical grounding within social science research. Based on that, the article identifies the criteria of ‘isomorphism’, ‘perspectivism’, transparency’ and ‘iterability’ as indicators of scientific acceptability of a systemic-constructivist research, and offers orientations for the design of such a research.","PeriodicalId":42156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mad-Revista del Magister en Analisis Sistemico Aplicado a la Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42124058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：