This Second Issue of 2019 focuses various topics in the more traditional context of the journal
2019年第二期聚焦于该杂志更传统的背景下的各种主题
{"title":"Editorial. SCIRES-It: an \"open access journal\"","authors":"V. Valzano, M. Cigola","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N2PI","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N2PI","url":null,"abstract":"This Second Issue of 2019 focuses various topics in the more traditional context of the journal","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48801148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-31DOI: 10.2423/I22394303V9N2P57
S. Garagnani, Alice Cancilla, Elena Masina
Giuliano da Sangallo is one of the paramount figure emerging from the Italian architecture during the Renaissance. He was commissioned to build many buildings, leaving also an ample documentary corpus, made of sketches and more technical drawings. On some pages in the Codice Barberiniano, a rich collection of drawings stored at the Vatican Apostolic Library, Giuliano drafted a plan and a section view of a building that recent studies speculate to be a conceptual proposal for the Pope Julius II’s mausoleum. Beginning from these graphical representations, and taking into account many coeval paintings illustrating architectural details, several digital reconstructions were proposed and compared in two master thesis works, ending in a virtual computer model whose shape and proportions are expression of a plausible constructive hypothesis. Many analysis were also carried out on the model, in order to better understand the original Sangallo’s design intent.
Giuliano da Sangallo是文艺复兴时期意大利建筑界的杰出人物之一。他受委托建造了许多建筑，还留下了大量的文献资料，由草图和更多的技术图纸组成。在梵蒂冈使徒图书馆收藏的大量图纸《Barberiniano法典》的一些页面上，朱利安诺起草了一份建筑的平面图和剖面图，最近的研究推测这是教皇朱利叶斯二世陵墓的概念性建议。从这些图形表示开始，并考虑到许多描绘建筑细节的同时代绘画，在两篇硕士论文中提出并比较了几种数字重建，最终形成了一个虚拟计算机模型，其形状和比例表达了一个合理的建设性假设。为了更好地理解桑加洛最初的设计意图，还对模型进行了许多分析。
{"title":"Understanding the design intent through the analysis of Renaissance drawings. The digital reconstruction of an unbuilt mausoleum by Giuliano da Sangallo","authors":"S. Garagnani, Alice Cancilla, Elena Masina","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N2P57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N2P57","url":null,"abstract":"Giuliano da Sangallo is one of the paramount figure emerging from the Italian architecture during the Renaissance. He was commissioned to build many buildings, leaving also an ample documentary corpus, made of sketches and more technical drawings. On some pages in the Codice Barberiniano, a rich collection of drawings stored at the Vatican Apostolic Library, Giuliano drafted a plan and a section view of a building that recent studies speculate to be a conceptual proposal for the Pope Julius II’s mausoleum. Beginning from these graphical representations, and taking into account many coeval paintings illustrating architectural details, several digital reconstructions were proposed and compared in two master thesis works, ending in a virtual computer model whose shape and proportions are expression of a plausible constructive hypothesis. Many analysis were also carried out on the model, in order to better understand the original Sangallo’s design intent.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"57-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47565620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-31DOI: 10.2423/I22394303V9N2P47
Arturo Gallozzi, L. Senatore, R. M. Strollo
Focus is an overview on Robotics application for Cultural heritage and Built Cultural Heritage (a term that includes all the Architectural, Archaeological, and generally constructed artifacts). In the field of analysis and restoration of Cultural Heritage and Built Cultural Heritage it is interesting to have accurate and efficient operating methodologies. Indeed, robots and robotic systems can be designed and used for these applications. The join between DART (Laboratory of Documentation, Analysis, Survey of Architecture and Territory), LARM (Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics) of Cassino University and the LAREA (LAboratorio di Rilievo E Architettura) of Tor Vergata University, it was an example in sharing different knowledges and competences and in developing innovative robotic applications, which are able to operate in Cultural Heritage and Built Cultural Heritage.
重点概述了机器人技术在文化遗产和建筑文化遗产(包括所有建筑、考古和一般建造的文物)中的应用。在文化遗产和建筑文化遗产的分析和修复领域，拥有准确和高效的操作方法是一件有趣的事情。事实上，机器人和机器人系统可以设计并用于这些应用。DART(文献、分析、建筑和领土调查实验室)、卡西诺大学的LARM(机器人和机电一体化实验室)和托尔维尔加塔大学的LAREA (Rilievo E Architettura实验室)之间的合作，是分享不同知识和能力以及开发创新机器人应用的一个例子，这些应用能够在文化遗产和建筑文化遗产中运作。
{"title":"An overview on Robotic Applications for Cultural Heritage and Built Cultural Heritage","authors":"Arturo Gallozzi, L. Senatore, R. M. Strollo","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N2P47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N2P47","url":null,"abstract":"Focus is an overview on Robotics application for Cultural heritage and Built Cultural Heritage (a term that includes all the Architectural, Archaeological, and generally constructed artifacts). In the field of analysis and restoration of Cultural Heritage and Built Cultural Heritage it is interesting to have accurate and efficient operating methodologies. Indeed, robots and robotic systems can be designed and used for these applications. The join between DART (Laboratory of Documentation, Analysis, Survey of Architecture and Territory), LARM (Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics) of Cassino University and the LAREA (LAboratorio di Rilievo E Architettura) of Tor Vergata University, it was an example in sharing different knowledges and competences and in developing innovative robotic applications, which are able to operate in Cultural Heritage and Built Cultural Heritage.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"59 12","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41291120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-10DOI: 10.2423/I22394303V10SP35
M. C. Pievatolo
Open science is not a particularly novel idea: disclosing science to expose it to a public scrutiny is among the deeds of the modern science revolution. Neither is new the unbalance between science - the living craftsmanship of a knowledge community - and its alleged embodiment in textual objects: the scope of written papers is so wide in space and time that they can be adopted as knowledge proxies. Such a question, in fact, is as ancient as Plato's critique of writing in Phaedrus. Accordingly, open science can be understood in two different - and not necessarily congruent - meanings: (1) as a philosophical ideal of human emancipation through the opening of scholarly conversation among people; (2) as a management model that might also be aimed to the exploitation of open research texts and data for the sake of the market. Since the Italian research evaluation system is based on an administrative agency that is in control of all the facets of academic life, it would not be - administratively - difficult to add an open science mandate to the researchers' burden of duties. Philosophically, however, we have to ask not only why open science, today, needs to be mandated, but, above all, whether (open) science can be mandated. The application of a Kantian thought experiment to a vindication of the Italian State assessment of research attempted by one of its former functionaries helps us to show that: 1. open science needs to be mandated because it is not open any longer; 2. the very submission of research to blueprints dictated by an administrative authority reduces it to a bureaucratic, commodified enterprise whose horizon is not the advancement of learning - or discoveries and revolutions yet to do - but the production of information and data whose goal is not determined by the will to knowledge any longer, but by economic and political powers.
{"title":"Open science: human emancipation or bureaucratic serfdom?","authors":"M. C. Pievatolo","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V10SP35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V10SP35","url":null,"abstract":"Open science is not a particularly novel idea: disclosing science to expose it to a public scrutiny is among the deeds of the modern science revolution. Neither is new the unbalance between science - the living craftsmanship of a knowledge community - and its alleged embodiment in textual objects: the scope of written papers is so wide in space and time that they can be adopted as knowledge proxies. Such a question, in fact, is as ancient as Plato's critique of writing in Phaedrus. Accordingly, open science can be understood in two different - and not necessarily congruent - meanings: (1) as a philosophical ideal of human emancipation through the opening of scholarly conversation among people; (2) as a management model that might also be aimed to the exploitation of open research texts and data for the sake of the market. \u0000 \u0000Since the Italian research evaluation system is based on an administrative agency that is in control of all the facets of academic life, it would not be - administratively - difficult to add an open science mandate to the researchers' burden of duties. Philosophically, however, we have to ask not only why open science, today, needs to be mandated, but, above all, whether (open) science can be mandated. \u0000 \u0000The application of a Kantian thought experiment to a vindication of the Italian State assessment of research attempted by one of its former functionaries helps us to show that: \u0000 \u00001. open science needs to be mandated because it is not open any longer; \u00002. the very submission of research to blueprints dictated by an administrative authority reduces it to a bureaucratic, commodified enterprise whose horizon is not the advancement of learning - or discoveries and revolutions yet to do - but the production of information and data whose goal is not determined by the will to knowledge any longer, but by economic and political powers.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":"35-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43881806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-09-01Epub Date: 2019-08-28DOI: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_104_19
Ibraheem Motabi, Musa Alzahrani, Reyad Dada, Mubarak Al-Mansour, Hani Alhashmi, Magdy Kandil, Ahmed Sagheir, Ayman Alhejazi
{"title":"Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: Saudi Lymphoma Group's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Management and Follow-up.","authors":"Ibraheem Motabi, Musa Alzahrani, Reyad Dada, Mubarak Al-Mansour, Hani Alhashmi, Magdy Kandil, Ahmed Sagheir, Ayman Alhejazi","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_104_19","DOIUrl":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_104_19","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"222-225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734723/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90793642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Redesigning the public space of cultural heritage in Europe is perceived today as a necessity. The article outlines the process that led in the space of few years to a renewed policy framework on cultural heritage in Europe, based on the principles of a holistic, integrated and participatory approach to its care and governance. The European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018 offered the opportunity to translate those principles into action, with impressive results in terms of public participation and deliverables. Following the launch by the European Commission of the European Framework for Action, whose aim is to secure a long-term policy impact of the European Year beyond 2018, this special issue of SCIRES-IT Journal looks back into the European Year and investigates to what extent this initiative has contributed to making space to innovation, in the cultural heritage sector and beyond.
{"title":"Editorial. European year of Cultural-Heritage. A laboratory for heritage-based innovation","authors":"E. Sciacchitano","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N1P1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N1P1","url":null,"abstract":"Redesigning the public space of cultural heritage in Europe is perceived today as a necessity. The article outlines the process that led in the space of few years to a renewed policy framework on cultural heritage in Europe, based on the principles of a holistic, integrated and participatory approach to its care and governance. The European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018 offered the opportunity to translate those principles into action, with impressive results in terms of public participation and deliverables. Following the launch by the European Commission of the European Framework for Action, whose aim is to secure a long-term policy impact of the European Year beyond 2018, this special issue of SCIRES-IT Journal looks back into the European Year and investigates to what extent this initiative has contributed to making space to innovation, in the cultural heritage sector and beyond.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47766845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-26DOI: 10.2423/I22394303V9N1P69
Neil Forbes, Silvana Colella
This article presents the work of the REACH project and its contribution to the EYCH Initiative #9 ‘Heritage for All’. It reflects on the issue of participatory approaches to cultural heritage, focusing in particular on: 1) the REACH repository of good practices, a dataset comprising over 100 examples, European and extra European, of social participation in cultural heritage; 2) the REACH Participatory Framework, developed to provide a protocol of participatory procedures and to support the organisation of local encounters; 3) the future of heritage research, in the light of current discussions about the constitution of a new coordination structure for European heritage research.
{"title":"Embedding Engagement: Participatory Approaches to Cultural Heritage","authors":"Neil Forbes, Silvana Colella","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N1P69","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N1P69","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the work of the REACH project and its contribution to the EYCH Initiative #9 ‘Heritage for All’. It reflects on the issue of participatory approaches to cultural heritage, focusing in particular on: 1) the REACH repository of good practices, a dataset comprising over 100 examples, European and extra European, of social participation in cultural heritage; 2) the REACH Participatory Framework, developed to provide a protocol of participatory procedures and to support the organisation of local encounters; 3) the future of heritage research, in the light of current discussions about the constitution of a new coordination structure for European heritage research.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"69-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44646438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This First Issue of 2019 “European year of Cultural-Heritage. A laboratory for heritage-based innovation” focuses on an overview of European Year of Cultural Heritage which was held in 2018; Guest Editor of this Issue is Ermina Sciacchitano.
{"title":"Editorial SCIRES-IT: an Overview on European Year of Cultural Heritage – EYCH 2018","authors":"V. Valzano, M. Cigola","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N1PI","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N1PI","url":null,"abstract":"This First Issue of 2019 “European year of Cultural-Heritage. A laboratory for heritage-based innovation” focuses on an overview of European Year of Cultural Heritage which was held in 2018; Guest Editor of this Issue is Ermina Sciacchitano.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48478480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-26DOI: 10.2423/I22394303V9N1P41
Sneška Quaedvlieg-Mihailović, L. Aldana
The last years have paved the way for the significant development and better structuring of a pan-European movement of civil society supporting cultural heritage. The designation of 2018 as the European Year of Cultural Heritage – the only thematic year of the Juncker Commission – marked a turning point for this ever-growing movement. Firstly, because it represented a true milestone for the public recognition of cultural heritage as a unique resource for Europe. Secondly, because it saw an unprecedented Europe-wide and bottom-up mobilisation of heritage stakeholders. And thirdly, as it provided a playing field to put collective knowledge into practice, through effective multi-stakeholder and cross-sectoral approaches. This article highlights the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018 as a huge opportunity for civil society action in the heritage field, and conversely, civil society action as a driver for heritage policy development in Europe. It also identifies three main challenges to be addressed in the future in order to sustain the legacy of the European Year. Firstly, to continue raising awareness and reaching out to citizens and stakeholders at the local level. Secondly, to find an adequate formula for a permanent cooperation and co-ordination on cultural heritage policies at EU level. And thirdly, to sustain and increase funding for cultural heritage in future EU programmes.
{"title":"The European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018: A turning point for the citizens’ movement supporting cultural heritage in Europe","authors":"Sneška Quaedvlieg-Mihailović, L. Aldana","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N1P41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N1P41","url":null,"abstract":"The last years have paved the way for the significant development and better structuring of a pan-European movement of civil society supporting cultural heritage. The designation of 2018 as the European Year of Cultural Heritage – the only thematic year of the Juncker Commission – marked a turning point for this ever-growing movement. Firstly, because it represented a true milestone for the public recognition of cultural heritage as a unique resource for Europe. Secondly, because it saw an unprecedented Europe-wide and bottom-up mobilisation of heritage stakeholders. And thirdly, as it provided a playing field to put collective knowledge into practice, through effective multi-stakeholder and cross-sectoral approaches. This article highlights the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018 as a huge opportunity for civil society action in the heritage field, and conversely, civil society action as a driver for heritage policy development in Europe. It also identifies three main challenges to be addressed in the future in order to sustain the legacy of the European Year. Firstly, to continue raising awareness and reaching out to citizens and stakeholders at the local level. Secondly, to find an adequate formula for a permanent cooperation and co-ordination on cultural heritage policies at EU level. And thirdly, to sustain and increase funding for cultural heritage in future EU programmes.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43836020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-26DOI: 10.2423/I22394303V9N1P15
S. Costa
The European Year of cultural Heritage -2018 is a success story both for the large and qualified participation and for the EU enhancement of the cultural policies. Never the teamwork between the EU institutions (Commission, Parliament and Council) worked so closely, mainstreaming the Cultural Heritage as a shared resource able to connect the communities and the stakeholders and to strengthen the intrinsic cultural values, economy, cooperation and external relations. The EYCH legacy is now implemented into the main EU multiannual Agendas, Work plan and Programs, with improved resources, detailed plans of action and shared governance. After the recent European elections, is now to the new EU represerntatives to bring these premises to a stronger reality.
{"title":"European year of Cultural Heritage-2018: An impressive result to be consolidated","authors":"S. Costa","doi":"10.2423/I22394303V9N1P15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2423/I22394303V9N1P15","url":null,"abstract":"The European Year of cultural Heritage -2018 is a success story both for the large and qualified participation and for the EU enhancement of the cultural policies. Never the teamwork between the EU institutions (Commission, Parliament and Council) worked so closely, mainstreaming the Cultural Heritage as a shared resource able to connect the communities and the stakeholders and to strengthen the intrinsic cultural values, economy, cooperation and external relations. The EYCH legacy is now implemented into the main EU multiannual Agendas, Work plan and Programs, with improved resources, detailed plans of action and shared governance. After the recent European elections, is now to the new EU represerntatives to bring these premises to a stronger reality.","PeriodicalId":42707,"journal":{"name":"SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41357007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：