首页 > 最新文献

Tobacco Use Insights最新文献

英文 中文
The Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Disease Severity 电子烟使用与SARS-CoV-2感染和新冠肺炎疾病严重程度的关系
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173x221096638
A. Burnett-Hartman, Shauna Goldberg Scott, J. D. Powers, Morgan N Clennin, J. Lyons, M. Gray, H. Feigelson
BACKGROUND Although combustible cigarette use is an established risk factor for severe COVID-19 disease, there is conflicting evidence for the association of electronic cigarette use with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease severity. METHODS Study participants were from the Kaiser Permanente Research Bank (KPRB), a biorepository that includes adult Kaiser Permanente members from across the United States. Starting in April 2020, electronic surveys were sent to KPRB members to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These surveys collected information on self-report of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-related risk factors, including electronic cigarette and combustible cigarette smoking history. We also used electronic health records data to assess COVID-19 diagnoses, positive PCR lab tests, hospitalizations, and death. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories (never, former, and current). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, we used multivariable logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the odds of hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories. RESULTS There were 126,475 individuals who responded to the survey and completed questions on e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use (48% response rate). Among survey respondents, 819 (1%) currently used e-cigarettes, 3,691 (3%) formerly used e-cigarettes, and 121,965 (96%) had never used e-cigarettes. After adjustment for demographic, behavioral, and clinical factors, there was no association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and former e-cigarette use (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99; CI: 0.83–1.18) or current e-cigarette use (HR = 1.08; CI: 0.76–1.52). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was no association with hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection and former e-cigarette use (odds ratio (OR) = 1.19; CI: 0.59–2.43) or current e-cigarette use (OR = 1.02; CI: 0.22–4.74). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that e-cigarette use is not associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 illness.
背景尽管可燃香烟的使用是严重新冠肺炎疾病的一个既定风险因素,但有相互矛盾的证据表明电子香烟的使用与SARS-CoV-2感染和新冠肺炎疾病严重程度有关。方法研究参与者来自Kaiser Permanente研究银行(KPRB),这是一家生物库,包括来自美国各地的Kaiser Perminente成年成员。从2020年4月开始,向KPRB成员发送了电子调查,以评估新冠肺炎大流行的影响。这些调查收集了关于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染的自我报告和新冠肺炎相关风险因素的信息,包括电子烟和可燃烟吸烟史。我们还使用电子健康记录数据评估新冠肺炎诊断、PCR实验室检测阳性、住院和死亡。我们使用多变量Cox比例风险回归来计算调整后的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),根据电子烟使用类别(从未、以前和现在)比较个体之间感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的风险。在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染者中,我们使用多变量逻辑回归来估计调整后的比值比(or)和95%置信区间,根据电子烟使用类别比较感染后30天内的住院或死亡几率。结果共有126475人回答了调查,并完成了关于电子烟和可燃香烟使用的问题(48%的回答率)。在调查对象中,819人(1%)目前使用电子烟,3691人(3%)以前使用过电子烟,121965人(96%)从未使用过电子香烟。在对人口统计学、行为学和临床因素进行调整后,与严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染和以前使用电子烟无关(危险比(HR)=0.99;CI:0.83-1.18)或当前使用电子烟(HR=1.08;CI:0.76-1.52)。在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染者中,与感染后30天内的住院或死亡以及以前使用电子烟无关(比值比(or)=1.19;CI:0.59–2.43)或当前使用电子烟(or=1.02;CI:0.22–4.74)。结论我们的研究结果表明,使用电子烟与SARS-CoV-2感染或严重新冠肺炎疾病的风险增加无关。
{"title":"The Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Disease Severity","authors":"A. Burnett-Hartman, Shauna Goldberg Scott, J. D. Powers, Morgan N Clennin, J. Lyons, M. Gray, H. Feigelson","doi":"10.1177/1179173x221096638","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173x221096638","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Although combustible cigarette use is an established risk factor for severe COVID-19 disease, there is conflicting evidence for the association of electronic cigarette use with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease severity. METHODS Study participants were from the Kaiser Permanente Research Bank (KPRB), a biorepository that includes adult Kaiser Permanente members from across the United States. Starting in April 2020, electronic surveys were sent to KPRB members to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These surveys collected information on self-report of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-related risk factors, including electronic cigarette and combustible cigarette smoking history. We also used electronic health records data to assess COVID-19 diagnoses, positive PCR lab tests, hospitalizations, and death. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories (never, former, and current). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, we used multivariable logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the odds of hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories. RESULTS There were 126,475 individuals who responded to the survey and completed questions on e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use (48% response rate). Among survey respondents, 819 (1%) currently used e-cigarettes, 3,691 (3%) formerly used e-cigarettes, and 121,965 (96%) had never used e-cigarettes. After adjustment for demographic, behavioral, and clinical factors, there was no association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and former e-cigarette use (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99; CI: 0.83–1.18) or current e-cigarette use (HR = 1.08; CI: 0.76–1.52). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was no association with hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection and former e-cigarette use (odds ratio (OR) = 1.19; CI: 0.59–2.43) or current e-cigarette use (OR = 1.02; CI: 0.22–4.74). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that e-cigarette use is not associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 illness.","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49393134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Cigarette Prices and Smoking Experimentation in Sierra Leone: An Exploratory Study 塞拉利昂卷烟价格与吸烟实验:一项探索性研究
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X221078189
M. Boachie, M. Immurana, J. Agyemang, H. Ross
This study examines the effect of cigarette prices on the likelihood of experimental smoking among adolescents in Sierra Leone. The study links data from the 2017 Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) to price data covering 2008–2017 obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO). After employing duration analysis techniques, we find that increases in cigarette prices are associated with a lower probability of smoking experimentation, with an estimated price elasticity of −1.63 (CI: −.24 to −3.02). Other factors affecting an adolescent’s decision to experiment with smoking are parental and friends’ smoking status, gender, exposure to tobacco advertising, and income. We conclude that higher prices, through excise taxation, are important tools for controlling smoking uptake among the youth of Sierra Leone.
本研究探讨香烟价格对塞拉利昂青少年实验性吸烟可能性的影响。该研究将2017年全球青年烟草调查(GYTS)的数据与世界卫生组织(WHO)获得的2008-2017年价格数据联系起来。在使用持续时间分析技术后,我们发现香烟价格的上涨与吸烟实验的较低概率相关,估计价格弹性为- 1.63 (CI: -)。24 ~−3.02)。影响青少年决定尝试吸烟的其他因素包括父母和朋友的吸烟状况、性别、接触烟草广告和收入。我们的结论是,通过消费税提高价格是控制塞拉利昂年轻人吸烟的重要工具。
{"title":"Cigarette Prices and Smoking Experimentation in Sierra Leone: An Exploratory Study","authors":"M. Boachie, M. Immurana, J. Agyemang, H. Ross","doi":"10.1177/1179173X221078189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221078189","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the effect of cigarette prices on the likelihood of experimental smoking among adolescents in Sierra Leone. The study links data from the 2017 Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) to price data covering 2008–2017 obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO). After employing duration analysis techniques, we find that increases in cigarette prices are associated with a lower probability of smoking experimentation, with an estimated price elasticity of −1.63 (CI: −.24 to −3.02). Other factors affecting an adolescent’s decision to experiment with smoking are parental and friends’ smoking status, gender, exposure to tobacco advertising, and income. We conclude that higher prices, through excise taxation, are important tools for controlling smoking uptake among the youth of Sierra Leone.","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45984581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Effects of Abstinence Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancies of Tobacco Smoking on the Desire to Quit Among Saudi Women: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis 沙特妇女戒瘾自我效能感和吸烟效果预期对戒烟欲望的影响:跨部门中介分析
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X221075581
Abdullah M M Alanazi, Shahad F Almutairi, Alanoud A Alsarami, Fay J Alanazi, Lama Alqahtani, Tareq Alotaibi, Saleh S Algarni, Sarah S Monshi, T. Ismaeil
Background Smoking is one of the major preventable causes of morbidity and mortality and has been associated with numerous illnesses. While smoking is increasing among Saudi women, the characteristics of smoking behavior related to abstinence self-efficacy, which is a belief regarding one’s ability to successfully resist performing a behavior, and outcome expectancies, meaning the anticipated consequences of performing a behavior, are unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to test whether abstinence self-efficacy mediated the relationship between tobacco smoking outcome expectancies and the desire to quit tobacco among Saudi women who smoke. Methods This cross-sectional study collected a sample of 211 Saudi women who smoked tobacco, including cigarettes and shisha. A self-administered questionnaire was used to examine several variables, including abstinence self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and desire to quit tobacco smoking. Mediational path analysis was used to answer the research question. Indirect effects were estimated through a bootstrapping of 10,000. Results All 4 constructs of outcome expectancies (negative consequences, positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, and appetite/weight control) were associated with lower abstinence self-efficacy and desire to quit tobacco smoking. In the mediation analysis, the indirect effect of negative consequences (standardized beta = −.013, SE = .008, 95% CI [−.030, −.001]), negative reinforcement (standardized beta = −.012, SE = .006, 95% CI [−.025, −.001]), and appetite/weight control (standardized beta = −.008, SE = .006, 95% CI [−.022, −.001]) through abstinence self-efficacy were significant, suggesting mediation in the relationship between outcome expectancies and desire to quit tobacco smoking. Conclusion Cognitive mechanisms that may explain the desire to quit tobacco smoking among Saudi women were identified. Although future longitudinal studies are required to determine relationships prospectively, targeted interventions that correct tobacco smoking outcome expectancies and boost abstinence self-efficacy skills may reduce tobacco smoking among Saudi women.
吸烟是导致发病和死亡的主要可预防原因之一,并与许多疾病有关。虽然吸烟在沙特女性中越来越多,但吸烟行为的特征与戒烟自我效能有关,这是一种关于一个人成功抵制某种行为的能力的信念,以及结果预期,即执行某种行为的预期后果,是未知的。因此,本研究旨在检验戒烟自我效能感是否在吸烟沙特女性吸烟结果预期与戒烟愿望之间起中介作用。方法本横断面研究收集了211名吸烟的沙特妇女,包括香烟和水烟。一份自我管理的问卷被用来检查几个变量,包括戒烟自我效能、结果预期和戒烟的愿望。采用中介通径分析来回答研究问题。间接影响是通过自举10000来估计的。结果结果预期的所有4个构念(消极后果、积极强化、消极强化和食欲/体重控制)均与较低的戒烟自我效能感和戒烟愿望相关。在中介分析中,负面后果的间接影响(标准化beta =−。013, se = 0.008, 95% ci[−。030,−.001]),负强化(标准化β =−。012, se = 0.006, 95% ci[−。025,−.001]),以及食欲/体重控制(标准化β =−。008, se = .006, 95% ci[−。[022,−.001])通过戒烟自我效能感显著,提示结果预期与戒烟愿望之间存在中介关系。结论认知机制可能解释了沙特妇女戒烟的愿望。虽然未来的纵向研究需要确定前瞻性的关系,有针对性的干预措施,纠正吸烟的结果预期和提高戒烟自我效能技能可能会减少沙特妇女吸烟。
{"title":"Effects of Abstinence Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancies of Tobacco Smoking on the Desire to Quit Among Saudi Women: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis","authors":"Abdullah M M Alanazi, Shahad F Almutairi, Alanoud A Alsarami, Fay J Alanazi, Lama Alqahtani, Tareq Alotaibi, Saleh S Algarni, Sarah S Monshi, T. Ismaeil","doi":"10.1177/1179173X221075581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221075581","url":null,"abstract":"Background Smoking is one of the major preventable causes of morbidity and mortality and has been associated with numerous illnesses. While smoking is increasing among Saudi women, the characteristics of smoking behavior related to abstinence self-efficacy, which is a belief regarding one’s ability to successfully resist performing a behavior, and outcome expectancies, meaning the anticipated consequences of performing a behavior, are unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to test whether abstinence self-efficacy mediated the relationship between tobacco smoking outcome expectancies and the desire to quit tobacco among Saudi women who smoke. Methods This cross-sectional study collected a sample of 211 Saudi women who smoked tobacco, including cigarettes and shisha. A self-administered questionnaire was used to examine several variables, including abstinence self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and desire to quit tobacco smoking. Mediational path analysis was used to answer the research question. Indirect effects were estimated through a bootstrapping of 10,000. Results All 4 constructs of outcome expectancies (negative consequences, positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, and appetite/weight control) were associated with lower abstinence self-efficacy and desire to quit tobacco smoking. In the mediation analysis, the indirect effect of negative consequences (standardized beta = −.013, SE = .008, 95% CI [−.030, −.001]), negative reinforcement (standardized beta = −.012, SE = .006, 95% CI [−.025, −.001]), and appetite/weight control (standardized beta = −.008, SE = .006, 95% CI [−.022, −.001]) through abstinence self-efficacy were significant, suggesting mediation in the relationship between outcome expectancies and desire to quit tobacco smoking. Conclusion Cognitive mechanisms that may explain the desire to quit tobacco smoking among Saudi women were identified. Although future longitudinal studies are required to determine relationships prospectively, targeted interventions that correct tobacco smoking outcome expectancies and boost abstinence self-efficacy skills may reduce tobacco smoking among Saudi women.","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41846850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
A New Ingenious Enemy: Heat-Not-Burn Products 一个新的巧妙的敌人:加热不燃烧产品
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X221076419
Samuel C J Kim, T. Friedman
While cigarette smoking is still a major source of morbidity and mortality, e-cigarette usage is skyrocketing, and the tobacco industry is finding new ways to market nicotine. With updated published research highlighting the dangers of cigarette smoking and now vaping, the industry has been developing new techniques and devices that circumvent this research to hook users on tobacco and nicotine. The FDA allowed Philip Morris International (PMI) to sell their heat not burn tobacco products known as iQOS in 2019. By 2019, 49 countries had permitted the sale of iQOS. This commentary summarizes the recent research on heat not burn cigarettes, also known as heated tobacco products and their effects on public policy. We urge policy makers to consider the research published regarding these new products and prevent the widespread use of these products that will harm public health.
尽管吸烟仍然是发病率和死亡率的主要来源,但电子烟的使用量正在飙升,烟草行业正在寻找新的尼古丁营销方式。随着最新发表的研究强调了吸烟和现在电子烟的危险,该行业一直在开发新的技术和设备,以绕过这项研究,吸引用户使用烟草和尼古丁。2019年,美国食品药品监督管理局允许菲利普莫里斯国际公司(PMI)销售其名为iQOS的热不燃烟草产品。截至2019年,已有49个国家允许销售iQOS。这篇评论总结了最近关于热不燃香烟(也称为加热烟草产品)及其对公共政策的影响的研究。我们敦促政策制定者考虑发表的关于这些新产品的研究,并防止这些产品的广泛使用,这将损害公众健康。
{"title":"A New Ingenious Enemy: Heat-Not-Burn Products","authors":"Samuel C J Kim, T. Friedman","doi":"10.1177/1179173X221076419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221076419","url":null,"abstract":"While cigarette smoking is still a major source of morbidity and mortality, e-cigarette usage is skyrocketing, and the tobacco industry is finding new ways to market nicotine. With updated published research highlighting the dangers of cigarette smoking and now vaping, the industry has been developing new techniques and devices that circumvent this research to hook users on tobacco and nicotine. The FDA allowed Philip Morris International (PMI) to sell their heat not burn tobacco products known as iQOS in 2019. By 2019, 49 countries had permitted the sale of iQOS. This commentary summarizes the recent research on heat not burn cigarettes, also known as heated tobacco products and their effects on public policy. We urge policy makers to consider the research published regarding these new products and prevent the widespread use of these products that will harm public health.","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43906007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Promotion of Smoking Cessation Using the Transtheoretical Model: Short-Term and Long-Term Effectiveness for Workers in Coastal Central Taiwan. 运用跨理论模型促进台湾中部沿海劳工戒烟之短期与长期效果。
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X221104410
Ming-Feng Tseng, Chia-Chen Huang, Stella Chin-Shaw Tsai, Ming-Daw Tsay, Yu-Kang Chang, Chun-Lin Juan, Fang-Chi Hsu, Ruey-Hong Wong

Background: Smoking cessation reduces the risk of severe illnesses in the long run and contributes to improving health. This study evaluated the short-term and long-term effectiveness of workplace smoking cessation intervention implemented using the transtheoretical model.

Methods: Participants were assessed at baseline before the intervention and after 6 months and 4 years of follow-ups. Data on changes in participants' perception of smoking prohibition in the workplace, knowledge of the hazards of smoking, attitude towards quitting smoking, and behavior related to tobacco harm prevention were collected.

Results: Results showed the prevalence of smoking cessation was 31.5% (95% CI: 25.4-38.1%) after 6 months and 10.7% (95% CI: 6.9-15.6%) after 4 years. At the abovementioned time points, the prevalence of second-hand smoke exposure, and the proportion of people who demonstrated correct knowledge of smoke hazards initially decreased and then increased. The proportion of participants who had seen or received information about tobacco harm prevention provided in the workplace increased from 75.6% at baseline to 95.6% (increased by 20.0%) after 6 months and finally to 97.2% (increased by 21.6%) after 4 years (P < .001). However, the percentage of participants who hoped their workplace continued to provide smoking cessation services rose from 80.0% at baseline to 93.6% (increased by 13.6%) after 6 months and then fell to 78.0% (decreased by 2.0%) after 4 years (P < .001).

Conclusion: The short-term effectiveness of the transtheoretical model in promoting workplace smoking cessation is substantial, but in the long-term, effectiveness weakens.

背景:从长远来看,戒烟可以降低患严重疾病的风险,有助于改善健康。本研究使用跨理论模型评估了工作场所戒烟干预的短期和长期有效性。方法:在干预前、随访6个月和随访4年后对参与者进行基线评估。收集了参与者对工作场所禁烟的认知、吸烟危害的知识、戒烟态度和与烟草危害预防相关的行为的变化数据。结果:结果显示,6个月后戒烟率为31.5% (95% CI: 25.4-38.1%), 4年后戒烟率为10.7% (95% CI: 6.9-15.6%)。在上述时间点,二手烟暴露的流行率和对烟雾危害有正确认识的人的比例先下降后上升。看到或收到工作场所提供的预防烟草危害信息的参与者比例从基线时的75.6%增加到6个月后的95.6%(增加20.0%),4年后最终增加到97.2%(增加21.6%)(P < 0.001)。然而,希望工作场所继续提供戒烟服务的参与者比例从基线时的80.0%上升到6个月后的93.6%(上升13.6%),4年后下降到78.0%(下降2.0%)(P < 0.001)。结论:跨理论模型在促进工作场所戒烟方面短期效果显著,但长期效果减弱。
{"title":"Promotion of Smoking Cessation Using the Transtheoretical Model: Short-Term and Long-Term Effectiveness for Workers in Coastal Central Taiwan.","authors":"Ming-Feng Tseng,&nbsp;Chia-Chen Huang,&nbsp;Stella Chin-Shaw Tsai,&nbsp;Ming-Daw Tsay,&nbsp;Yu-Kang Chang,&nbsp;Chun-Lin Juan,&nbsp;Fang-Chi Hsu,&nbsp;Ruey-Hong Wong","doi":"10.1177/1179173X221104410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221104410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking cessation reduces the risk of severe illnesses in the long run and contributes to improving health. This study evaluated the short-term and long-term effectiveness of workplace smoking cessation intervention implemented using the transtheoretical model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were assessed at baseline before the intervention and after 6 months and 4 years of follow-ups. Data on changes in participants' perception of smoking prohibition in the workplace, knowledge of the hazards of smoking, attitude towards quitting smoking, and behavior related to tobacco harm prevention were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed the prevalence of smoking cessation was 31.5% (95% CI: 25.4-38.1%) after 6 months and 10.7% (95% CI: 6.9-15.6%) after 4 years. At the abovementioned time points, the prevalence of second-hand smoke exposure, and the proportion of people who demonstrated correct knowledge of smoke hazards initially decreased and then increased. The proportion of participants who had seen or received information about tobacco harm prevention provided in the workplace increased from 75.6% at baseline to 95.6% (increased by 20.0%) after 6 months and finally to 97.2% (increased by 21.6%) after 4 years (<i>P</i> < .001). However, the percentage of participants who hoped their workplace continued to provide smoking cessation services rose from 80.0% at baseline to 93.6% (increased by 13.6%) after 6 months and then fell to 78.0% (decreased by 2.0%) after 4 years (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The short-term effectiveness of the transtheoretical model in promoting workplace smoking cessation is substantial, but in the long-term, effectiveness weakens.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"15 ","pages":"1179173X221104410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/6e/10.1177_1179173X221104410.PMC9168925.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10257013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Intention to Quit and Predictive Factors Among Current Smokers in Vietnam: Findings From Adult Tobacco Survey 2020 越南现有吸烟者的戒烟意愿和预测因素:2020年成人烟草调查结果
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X221098460
L. T. Hoang, T. T. Tuyet Hanh, L. N. Khue, P. T. Hai, Phan V Can, K. Long, N. T. Linh, D. T. Anh, Hoang Van Minh
BACKGROUND Smoking leads to many smoking-attributable diseases. The promotion of quitting tobacco smoking is urgent as it has significant and immediate health benefits and improves the impacts of other tobacco control strategies. Intention to quit smoking is considered the first step before quitting smoking. METHODOLOGY This paper used data from Vietnam provincial GATS 2020 on 80,166 participants who were 15-year-old or older. Data were collected from 34 provinces and cities throughout Vietnam and managed using REDCap. RESULTS Among those who were current smokers, 50.3% (95% CI: 49.1%–51.4%) had the intention to quit smoking. Some predictive factors found to be positively associated with the intention to quit smoking were age (from 45-64), education level, received information about harmful effects or encouragement to quit smoking from media channels (from 6 channels), hearing about the Tobacco Control Law and noticing health warnings on the cigarette package. There was no significant difference in intention to quit smoking between current smokers from urban and rural areas or among different age groups to start smoking. CONCLUSIONS Interventions or health promotion programs on smoking cessation should be focused on current smokers who have low education levels as they have a higher smoking rate and are less motivated to stop smoking. Received information about harmful effects or encouragement to quit smoking from media channels is also associated with stopping smoking in the future. The importance of health warning pictures on tobacco packages should be maintained and promoted as it has a specific effect on one’s intention to stop smoking.
吸烟导致许多吸烟引起的疾病。促进戒烟是紧迫的,因为它具有重大和直接的健康效益,并改善其他烟草控制战略的影响。立志戒烟是戒烟的第一步。本文使用了越南省GATS 2020的数据,涉及80,166名15岁或以上的参与者。数据收集自越南34个省市,并使用REDCap进行管理。结果:在当前吸烟者中,50.3% (95% CI: 49.1% ~ 51.4%)有戒烟意向。年龄(45-64岁)、受教育程度、从媒体渠道(6个渠道)获得有关戒烟有害影响或鼓励的信息、听说《控烟法》、看到烟盒上的健康警语与戒烟意愿呈正相关的预测因素。城市和农村现有吸烟者的戒烟意愿以及不同年龄段开始吸烟的意愿没有显著差异。结论戒烟干预或健康促进项目应侧重于低教育水平的现有吸烟者,因为他们的吸烟率较高,戒烟的积极性较低。从媒体渠道收到的有关有害影响或鼓励戒烟的信息也与今后戒烟有关。烟草包装上的健康警示图片的重要性应该保持和推广,因为它对人们戒烟的意图有特殊的影响。
{"title":"Intention to Quit and Predictive Factors Among Current Smokers in Vietnam: Findings From Adult Tobacco Survey 2020","authors":"L. T. Hoang, T. T. Tuyet Hanh, L. N. Khue, P. T. Hai, Phan V Can, K. Long, N. T. Linh, D. T. Anh, Hoang Van Minh","doi":"10.1177/1179173X221098460","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221098460","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Smoking leads to many smoking-attributable diseases. The promotion of quitting tobacco smoking is urgent as it has significant and immediate health benefits and improves the impacts of other tobacco control strategies. Intention to quit smoking is considered the first step before quitting smoking. METHODOLOGY This paper used data from Vietnam provincial GATS 2020 on 80,166 participants who were 15-year-old or older. Data were collected from 34 provinces and cities throughout Vietnam and managed using REDCap. RESULTS Among those who were current smokers, 50.3% (95% CI: 49.1%–51.4%) had the intention to quit smoking. Some predictive factors found to be positively associated with the intention to quit smoking were age (from 45-64), education level, received information about harmful effects or encouragement to quit smoking from media channels (from 6 channels), hearing about the Tobacco Control Law and noticing health warnings on the cigarette package. There was no significant difference in intention to quit smoking between current smokers from urban and rural areas or among different age groups to start smoking. CONCLUSIONS Interventions or health promotion programs on smoking cessation should be focused on current smokers who have low education levels as they have a higher smoking rate and are less motivated to stop smoking. Received information about harmful effects or encouragement to quit smoking from media channels is also associated with stopping smoking in the future. The importance of health warning pictures on tobacco packages should be maintained and promoted as it has a specific effect on one’s intention to stop smoking.","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46053419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Associations Between Perceptions of e-Cigarette Harmfulness and Addictiveness and the Age of E-Cigarette Initiation Among the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Youth. 烟草与健康(PATH)青少年人群评估中电子烟危害性和成瘾性认知与电子烟起始年龄之间的关联
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X221133645
Meagan A Bluestein, Melissa B Harrell, Emily T Hébert, Baojiang Chen, Arnold E Kuk, Charles E Spells, Adriana Pérez

Introduction: Youth perceptions of harmfulness and addictiveness of e-cigarettes may impact the age that they initiate e-cigarette use, but this has not been investigated previously.

Methods: Youth (12-17 years old) never e-cigarette users at their first wave of PATH participation (waves 1-3, 2013-2016) were included. PATH questions on absolute perceptions of e-cigarette harmfulness and addictiveness were used as exposures. Interval-censored Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the impact of perceptions of harmfulness, and perceptions of addictiveness on (i) the age of initiation of e-cigarette use and (ii) age of first reporting past 30-day e-cigarette use, while controlling for covariates.

Results: Youth who perceive e-cigarettes as having no/little harm had increased risk of initiating both ever e-cigarette use (AHR = 2.04; 95%CI = 1.74-2.40) and past 30-day e-cigarette use (AHR = 2.64; 95%CI = 2.07-3.37) at earlier ages compared to youth who perceive e-cigarettes as having a lot of harm. Youth who perceive the likelihood of becoming addicted to e-cigarettes to be very/somewhat unlikely had increased risk of an earlier age of both ever (AHR = 1.28; 95%CI = 1.07-1.52) and past 30-day (AHR = 1.36; 95%CI = 1.04-1.79) e-cigarette initiation compared to youth who perceived the likelihood of becoming addicted to e-cigarettes to be somewhat/very likely.

Conclusion: These results highlight the importance of communicating to youth the potential for health harms and addiction from e-cigarette use in prevention and intervention campaigns, as those with the lowest perceptions of harmfulness and addictiveness had the earliest ages of e-cigarette initiation.

青少年对电子烟的危害性和成瘾性的认知可能会影响他们开始使用电子烟的年龄,但这在以前没有被调查过。方法:纳入了首次参与PATH(2013-2016年第1-3波)时从未使用过电子烟的青少年(12-17岁)。关于电子烟危害性和成瘾性的绝对认知的帕斯问题被用作暴露。在控制协变量的同时,使用间隔审查的Cox比例风险模型来估计危害性感知和成瘾性感知对(i)开始使用电子烟的年龄和(ii)首次报告使用电子烟30天的年龄的影响。结果:认为电子烟没有/几乎没有危害的青少年开始使用电子烟的风险增加(AHR = 2.04;95%CI = 1.74-2.40)和过去30天使用电子烟(AHR = 2.64;95%CI = 2.07-3.37),而认为电子烟有很多危害的年轻人则更早。那些认为对电子烟上瘾的可能性非常/有些不太可能的年轻人,更早地吸烟的风险更高(AHR = 1.28;95%CI = 1.07-1.52)和过去30天(AHR = 1.36;(95%CI = 1.04-1.79)与那些认为有可能/非常有可能对电子烟上瘾的年轻人相比。结论:这些结果强调了在预防和干预运动中向青少年宣传电子烟使用对健康的潜在危害和成瘾的重要性,因为那些对电子烟的危害和成瘾程度最低的人开始吸电子烟的年龄最早。
{"title":"Associations Between Perceptions of e-Cigarette Harmfulness and Addictiveness and the Age of E-Cigarette Initiation Among the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Youth.","authors":"Meagan A Bluestein,&nbsp;Melissa B Harrell,&nbsp;Emily T Hébert,&nbsp;Baojiang Chen,&nbsp;Arnold E Kuk,&nbsp;Charles E Spells,&nbsp;Adriana Pérez","doi":"10.1177/1179173X221133645","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221133645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Youth perceptions of harmfulness and addictiveness of e-cigarettes may impact the age that they initiate e-cigarette use, but this has not been investigated previously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Youth (12-17 years old) never e-cigarette users at their first wave of PATH participation (waves 1-3, 2013-2016) were included. PATH questions on absolute perceptions of e-cigarette harmfulness and addictiveness were used as exposures. Interval-censored Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the impact of perceptions of harmfulness, and perceptions of addictiveness on (i) the age of initiation of e-cigarette use and (ii) age of first reporting past 30-day e-cigarette use, while controlling for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth who perceive e-cigarettes as having no/little harm had increased risk of initiating both ever e-cigarette use (AHR = 2.04; 95%CI = 1.74-2.40) and past 30-day e-cigarette use (AHR = 2.64; 95%CI = 2.07-3.37) at earlier ages compared to youth who perceive e-cigarettes as having a lot of harm. Youth who perceive the likelihood of becoming addicted to e-cigarettes to be very/somewhat unlikely had increased risk of an earlier age of both ever (AHR = 1.28; 95%CI = 1.07-1.52) and past 30-day (AHR = 1.36; 95%CI = 1.04-1.79) e-cigarette initiation compared to youth who perceived the likelihood of becoming addicted to e-cigarettes to be somewhat/very likely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results highlight the importance of communicating to youth the potential for health harms and addiction from e-cigarette use in prevention and intervention campaigns, as those with the lowest perceptions of harmfulness and addictiveness had the earliest ages of e-cigarette initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"15 ","pages":"1179173X221133645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/76/10.1177_1179173X221133645.PMC9585561.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9795245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stress, Dependence, and COVID-19-related Changes in Past 30-day Marijuana, Electronic Cigarette, and Cigarette Use among Youth and Young Adults. 青少年过去 30 天内吸食大麻、电子烟和香烟的压力、依赖性和 COVID-19 相关变化。
IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-12-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X211067439
Stephanie L Clendennen, Kathleen R Case, Aslesha Sumbe, Dale S Mantey, Emily J Mason, Melissa B Harrell

Background: Studies show smoking and vaping behaviors increase risk of contracting and worse symptoms of COVID-19. This study examines whether past 30-day youth and young adult users of marijuana, e-cigarettes, and cigarettes self-reported changes in their use of these substances due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and cross-sectional associations between perceived stress, nicotine or marijuana dependence, and COVID-19-related changes in use.

Methods: Participants were 709 past 30-day self-reported substance users from the Texas Adolescent Tobacco and Marketing Surveillance study (TATAMS; mean age = 19; 58% female; 38% Hispanic, 35% white). Multiple logistic regression models assessed cross-sectional associations between perceived stress and dependence and increased, decreased, or sustained past 30-day use of marijuana, e-cigarettes, and cigarettes due to COVID-19 (e.g., "Has your marijuana use changed due to the COVID-19 outbreak?"). Covariates included age, race/ethnicity, socio-economic status (SES), dependence (exposure: stress), and stress (exposure: dependence).

Results: Most participants reported sustained (41%, 43%, 49%) or increased (37%, 34%, 25%) use of marijuana, e-cigarettes, and cigarettes due to COVID-19, respectively. Participants who reported symptoms of dependence were significantly more likely than their non-dependent peers to report increasing their marijuana (AOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.15-2.39) and e-cigarette (AOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.38-4.77) use. Those who reported higher perceived stress were significantly more likely to report increasing their marijuana use (AOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.01-2.42).

Conclusions: Most youth and young adults did not decrease their substance use amid a global, respiratory disease pandemic. Health messaging and interventions that address the health effects of smoking and vaping as well as factors like stress and dependence that may be barriers to decreasing use are vital in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic.

背景:研究表明,吸烟和吸食电子烟的行为会增加感染COVID-19的风险并加重其症状。本研究调查了过去 30 天内使用大麻、电子烟和香烟的青少年和年轻成年人是否自述了他们使用这些物质的变化是由于 COVID-19 的流行;以及感知到的压力、尼古丁或大麻依赖与 COVID-19 相关使用变化之间的横断面关联:参与者为德克萨斯青少年烟草和营销监测研究(TATAMS;平均年龄 = 19;58% 为女性;38% 为西班牙裔,35% 为白人)中 709 名过去 30 天自我报告的药物使用者。多元逻辑回归模型评估了感知压力和依赖性与 COVID-19 导致的过去 30 天使用大麻、电子烟和香烟的增加、减少或持续之间的横截面关联(例如,"COVID-19 的爆发是否改变了您使用大麻的情况?)协变量包括年龄、种族/民族、社会经济地位(SES)、依赖性(暴露:压力)和压力(暴露:依赖性):大多数参与者报告说,由于 COVID-19,他们分别持续(41%、43%、49%)或增加(37%、34%、25%)使用大麻、电子烟和香烟。报告有依赖症状的参与者报告增加使用大麻(AOR:1.66;95% CI:1.15-2.39)和电子烟(AOR:2.57;95% CI:1.38-4.77)的可能性明显高于无依赖症状的参与者。报告压力感知较高的人更有可能增加大麻的使用(AOR:1.55;95% CI:1.01-2.42):结论:在全球呼吸道疾病大流行的情况下,大多数青少年和年轻人并没有减少使用药物。针对吸烟和吸食毒品对健康的影响以及可能阻碍减少使用的压力和依赖性等因素的健康信息和干预措施对于遏制 COVID-19 的流行至关重要。
{"title":"Stress, Dependence, and COVID-19-related Changes in Past 30-day Marijuana, Electronic Cigarette, and Cigarette Use among Youth and Young Adults.","authors":"Stephanie L Clendennen, Kathleen R Case, Aslesha Sumbe, Dale S Mantey, Emily J Mason, Melissa B Harrell","doi":"10.1177/1179173X211067439","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1179173X211067439","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies show smoking and vaping behaviors increase risk of contracting and worse symptoms of COVID-19. This study examines whether past 30-day youth and young adult users of marijuana, e-cigarettes, and cigarettes self-reported changes in their use of these substances due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and cross-sectional associations between perceived stress, nicotine or marijuana dependence, and COVID-19-related changes in use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 709 past 30-day self-reported substance users from the Texas Adolescent Tobacco and Marketing Surveillance study (TATAMS; mean age = 19; 58% female; 38% Hispanic, 35% white). Multiple logistic regression models assessed cross-sectional associations between perceived stress and dependence and increased, decreased, or sustained past 30-day use of marijuana, e-cigarettes, and cigarettes due to COVID-19 (e.g., \"Has your marijuana use changed due to the COVID-19 outbreak?\"). Covariates included age, race/ethnicity, socio-economic status (SES), dependence (exposure: stress), and stress (exposure: dependence).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants reported sustained (41%, 43%, 49%) or increased (37%, 34%, 25%) use of marijuana, e-cigarettes, and cigarettes due to COVID-19, respectively. Participants who reported symptoms of dependence were significantly more likely than their non-dependent peers to report increasing their marijuana (AOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.15-2.39) and e-cigarette (AOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.38-4.77) use. Those who reported higher perceived stress were significantly more likely to report increasing their marijuana use (AOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.01-2.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most youth and young adults did not decrease their substance use amid a global, respiratory disease pandemic. Health messaging and interventions that address the health effects of smoking and vaping as well as factors like stress and dependence that may be barriers to decreasing use are vital in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"14 ","pages":"1179173X211067439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f8/ea/10.1177_1179173X211067439.PMC8721399.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10400776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age of Onset of Susceptibility to Different Tobacco Products Among Non-Susceptible US Young Adults: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Waves 2-4 (2014-2017). 非易感美国年轻人对不同烟草制品易感的发病年龄:烟草与健康研究波2-4(2014-2017)的人口评估结果。
IF 2.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X211065643
Adriana Pérez, Meagan A Bluestein, Arnold E Kuk, Baojiang Chen, Kymberle L Sterling, Melissa B Harrell

Introduction: Initiation of tobacco products is increasing in young adulthood. This study prospectively estimated the age of onset of susceptibility to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, hookah, smokeless tobacco, and cigarillos among young adults, which is a cognitive precursor to initiation.

Methods: Secondary data analyses of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, a nationally representative longitudinal cohort study of US adults. Young adults (18-24 years) who were non-susceptible to each tobacco product (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, hookah, smokeless tobacco, and cigarillos) at waves 2 or 3 were followed-up into waves 3-4 to prospectively estimate the age of onset of susceptibility to each tobacco product. Weighted interval-censored survival methods and interval-censored Cox regression models were implemented to estimate the age of onset of susceptibility, and to estimate differences in the hazard function by sex and by race/ethnicity, while controlling for the total number of other tobacco products ever used at their first wave of participation in PATH.

Results: By age 21, 16.5%, 16.0%, 12.6%, 12.4%, and 5.9% of young adults reported onset of susceptibility to hookah, e-cigarettes, cigarillos, cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco, respectively. Among young adults who were non-susceptible to each tobacco product at waves 2 or 3, the highest increase in onset of susceptibility occurred between ages 18 and 19 for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and hookah, while the highest increase in onset of susceptibility occurs between ages 22 and 23 for cigarillos. Young adult males had increased risk of onset of susceptibility to cigarillos and smokeless tobacco at earlier ages than young adult females. Differences in onset of susceptibility to each tobacco product were also observed by race/ethnicity among young adults.

Conclusions: With the changing landscape of tobacco products, monitoring the age of onset of susceptibility of tobacco product use among non-susceptible young adults longitudinally is critical to prevent initiation. Communication and education campaigns tailored to address differences in susceptibility among young adults by tobacco product and sociodemographic factors will be useful.

在青年成年期,开始接触烟草制品的人数正在增加。本研究前瞻性地估计了年轻人对香烟、电子烟、水烟、无烟烟草和小雪茄易感性的发病年龄,这是开始的认知前兆。方法:二手数据分析烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究,这是一项具有全国代表性的美国成年人纵向队列研究。在第2波或第3波对每种烟草产品(香烟、电子烟、水烟、无烟烟草和小雪茄)不敏感的年轻人(18-24岁)在第3-4波进行随访,以前瞻性地估计每种烟草产品易感的发病年龄。采用加权间隔剔除生存法和间隔剔除Cox回归模型来估计易感发病年龄,并估计按性别和种族/民族的危害函数差异,同时控制首次参与适宜卫生技术计划时使用的其他烟草制品的总数。结果:21岁时,分别有16.5%、16.0%、12.6%、12.4%和5.9%的年轻人报告对水烟、电子烟、小雪茄、香烟和无烟烟草易感。在第2波或第3波对每种烟草产品都不敏感的年轻人中,香烟、电子烟和水烟的易感性发生率最高的年龄段是18至19岁,而小雪茄的易感性发生率最高的年龄段是22至23岁。与年轻成年女性相比,年轻成年男性在更早的年龄开始对小雪茄和无烟烟草易感性的风险增加。在年轻人中,还观察到不同种族/民族对每种烟草产品的易感性的开始差异。结论:随着烟草制品环境的变化,纵向监测非易感年轻人烟草制品使用易感的发病年龄对于预防开始使用至关重要。针对青年人易受烟草制品和社会人口因素影响的差异而进行的宣传和教育运动将是有益的。
{"title":"Age of Onset of Susceptibility to Different Tobacco Products Among Non-Susceptible US Young Adults: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Waves 2-4 (2014-2017).","authors":"Adriana Pérez,&nbsp;Meagan A Bluestein,&nbsp;Arnold E Kuk,&nbsp;Baojiang Chen,&nbsp;Kymberle L Sterling,&nbsp;Melissa B Harrell","doi":"10.1177/1179173X211065643","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X211065643","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Initiation of tobacco products is increasing in young adulthood. This study prospectively estimated the age of onset of susceptibility to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, hookah, smokeless tobacco, and cigarillos among young adults, which is a cognitive precursor to initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary data analyses of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, a nationally representative longitudinal cohort study of US adults. Young adults (18-24 years) who were non-susceptible to each tobacco product (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, hookah, smokeless tobacco, and cigarillos) at waves 2 or 3 were followed-up into waves 3-4 to prospectively estimate the age of onset of susceptibility to each tobacco product. Weighted interval-censored survival methods and interval-censored Cox regression models were implemented to estimate the age of onset of susceptibility, and to estimate differences in the hazard function by sex and by race/ethnicity, while controlling for the total number of other tobacco products ever used at their first wave of participation in PATH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By age 21, 16.5%, 16.0%, 12.6%, 12.4%, and 5.9% of young adults reported onset of susceptibility to hookah, e-cigarettes, cigarillos, cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco, respectively. Among young adults who were non-susceptible to each tobacco product at waves 2 or 3, the highest increase in onset of susceptibility occurred between ages 18 and 19 for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and hookah, while the highest increase in onset of susceptibility occurs between ages 22 and 23 for cigarillos. Young adult males had increased risk of onset of susceptibility to cigarillos and smokeless tobacco at earlier ages than young adult females. Differences in onset of susceptibility to each tobacco product were also observed by race/ethnicity among young adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the changing landscape of tobacco products, monitoring the age of onset of susceptibility of tobacco product use among non-susceptible young adults longitudinally is critical to prevent initiation. Communication and education campaigns tailored to address differences in susceptibility among young adults by tobacco product and sociodemographic factors will be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"14 ","pages":"1179173X211065643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/0a/10.1177_1179173X211065643.PMC8671673.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10334781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Predictors of E-Cigarette Initiation: Findings From the Youth and Young Adult Panel Study. 开始吸电子烟的预测因素:青少年小组研究结果。
IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2020-12-28 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/1179173X20977486
Navitha Jayakumar, Shawn O'Connor, Lori Diemert, Robert Schwartz

Objectives: Although previous studies have identified reasons why youth try e-cigarettes, longitudinal research is needed to identify predictors of e-cigarette initiation. This study assesses predictors of e-cigarette initiation among youth and young adults in the 2018-2019 Youth and Young Adult Panel Study.

Methods: This study examined the proportion of Canadian participants aged 16 to 25 (n = 137) reporting never use of e-cigarettes at baseline in 2018. Individuals were categorized as not initiated and initiated at 12-month follow-up. We examined demographic characteristics, substance use, health status, social influences and perception by initiation category. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated using logistic regression models and multivariable logistic regression model.

Results: Among the 137 never e-cigarette users at baseline, 59% remained never users while 41% initiated use of e-cigarettes during the 12-month follow-up. The results of multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that regularly seeing anyone use e-cigarettes (AOR: 4.11; 95% CI: 1.04, 16.31) and seeing anyone use e-cigarettes very often or always at baseline (AOR: 4.54; 95% CI: 1.21, 17.01) is associated with initiating e-cigarette use among youth and young adults.

Conclusion: The results revealed social influences to be the most important predictors of initiation among youth and young adults. Interventions to prevent youth and young adults from initiating e-cigarette use should expand from only focusing on peer use to reducing use in public space such as parks and recreational facilities.

研究目的:尽管之前的研究已经确定了青少年尝试电子烟的原因,但还需要纵向研究来确定电子烟启动的预测因素。本研究评估了2018-2019年青年和年轻成人小组研究中青年和年轻成人开始吸电子烟的预测因素:本研究调查了 2018 年基线时报告从未使用过电子烟的 16 至 25 岁加拿大参与者(n = 137)的比例。个人被分为未开始使用和在 12 个月随访时开始使用。我们按启动类别研究了人口统计学特征、药物使用、健康状况、社会影响和认知。使用逻辑回归模型和多变量逻辑回归模型计算调整后的几率比(AOR):在 137 名基线从未使用过电子烟的人中,59% 的人仍然从未使用过电子烟,41% 的人在 12 个月的随访期间开始使用电子烟。多变量逻辑回归分析结果表明,经常看到别人使用电子烟(AOR:4.11;95% CI:1.04,16.31)和基线时经常或总是看到别人使用电子烟(AOR:4.54;95% CI:1.21,17.01)与青少年开始使用电子烟有关:研究结果表明,社会影响是预测青少年开始使用电子烟的最重要因素。预防青少年开始使用电子烟的干预措施应从只关注同伴使用扩大到减少在公园和娱乐设施等公共场所的使用。
{"title":"Predictors of E-Cigarette Initiation: Findings From the Youth and Young Adult Panel Study.","authors":"Navitha Jayakumar, Shawn O'Connor, Lori Diemert, Robert Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/1179173X20977486","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1179173X20977486","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although previous studies have identified reasons why youth try e-cigarettes, longitudinal research is needed to identify predictors of e-cigarette initiation. This study assesses predictors of e-cigarette initiation among youth and young adults in the 2018-2019 Youth and Young Adult Panel Study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the proportion of Canadian participants aged 16 to 25 (n = 137) reporting never use of e-cigarettes at baseline in 2018. Individuals were categorized as not initiated and initiated at 12-month follow-up. We examined demographic characteristics, substance use, health status, social influences and perception by initiation category. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated using logistic regression models and multivariable logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 137 never e-cigarette users at baseline, 59% remained never users while 41% initiated use of e-cigarettes during the 12-month follow-up. The results of multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that regularly seeing anyone use e-cigarettes (AOR: 4.11; 95% CI: 1.04, 16.31) and seeing anyone use e-cigarettes very often or always at baseline (AOR: 4.54; 95% CI: 1.21, 17.01) is associated with initiating e-cigarette use among youth and young adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results revealed social influences to be the most important predictors of initiation among youth and young adults. Interventions to prevent youth and young adults from initiating e-cigarette use should expand from only focusing on peer use to reducing use in public space such as parks and recreational facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179173X20977486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/02/f5/10.1177_1179173X20977486.PMC7780163.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38820946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1