Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911212
Sharon Ann Musher
Revisiting the New Deal in the Shadow of a Double Pandemic Sharon Ann Musher (bio) Scott Borchert, Republic of Detours: How the New Deal Paid Broke Writers to Rediscover America. NY: Macmillan Publishers, 2021. 385 pp. Notes and index. $30. Mary Ann Calo, African American Artists and the New Deal Art Programs. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2023. 216 pp. Figures, notes, bibliography, and index. $74.95. Eric Rauchway, Why the New Deal Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021. 232 pp. Notes and index. $16. Sara Rutkowski, ed., Rewriting America: New Essays on the Federal Writers' Project. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2022. 264 pp. $30.95. Index. Jill Watts, The Black Cabinet: The Untold Story of African Americans and Politics During the Age of Roosevelt. NY: Grove Press, 2020. 560 pp. Figures, notes, bibliography, and index. $20. Today's politicians, activists, academics, writers, and artists regularly look to New Deal programs, rhetoric, and ideology to address contemporary challenges. In 2019, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) called for a Green New Deal through a bill introduced to the House.1 Although that bill was not enacted, the youth-led Sunrise Movement has grown around the concept of electing leaders to prioritize climate change, end reliance on fossil fuels, and guarantee universally accessible living wages. Shortly after President Biden's election in 2021, efforts to establish a new New Deal increased. Biden issued an Executive Order to create a Civilian Climate Corps that would put young people to work to tackle environmental degradation reminiscent of an earlier New Deal agenda. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was one of President Roosevelt's programs, employing young men on national conservation projects to plant trees and build trails.2 In May, Congressman Ted W. Lieu (D-CA) took up the New Deal mantle when he proposed a Twenty-First Century Federal Writers' Project Act, inspired by the original Writers' Project, [End Page 160] which hired unemployed white-collar workers across the nation to portray the country through State Guides, ethnic studies, and first-person interviews. Lieu's plan was similar but less direct. Rather than the federal government openly hiring writers, it would provide funds to non-profits, libraries, and news sources to engage struggling writers to document COVID's impact and honor lives lost.3 That August, Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-NM) presented the Creative Economy Revitalization Act (CERA) to the House. CERA resonated with the New Deal's Work Progress Administration (WPA), a work-relief program that included the Writers' Project.4 Like the proposed Twenty-First Century FWP, Fernandez's act called for less immediate aid to the unemployed. Instead, the Department of Labor would work with the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) to administer grants to organizations to hire artists to create accessible art. That September, Ben Ray Lujan (D-
在双重流行病的阴影下重新审视新政莎朗·安·穆希尔(传记)斯科特·博尔切特,弯路共和国:新政如何让破产的作家重新发现美国。纽约:麦克米伦出版社,2021年。385页。注释和索引。30美元。玛丽·安·卡洛,非裔美国艺术家和新政艺术项目。大学公园:宾夕法尼亚州立大学出版社,2023。216页。图表、注释、参考书目和索引。74.95美元。埃里克·劳赫威,《新政为什么重要》。纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2021。232页。注释和索引。16美元。Sara Rutkowski主编,《重写美国:关于联邦作家项目的新文章》。阿默斯特:马萨诸塞大学出版社,2022。264页,30.95美元。索引。吉尔·沃茨,《黑人内阁:不为人知的非裔美国人和罗斯福时代政治的故事》。纽约:格罗夫出版社,2020。560页。图表、注释、参考书目和索引。20美元。今天的政治家、活动家、学者、作家和艺术家经常关注新政的计划、修辞和意识形态,以应对当代的挑战。2019年,纽约州民主党众议员亚历山大·奥卡西奥-科尔特斯(Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)通过向众议院提交的一项法案呼吁实施绿色新政1 .尽管该法案没有颁布,但由年轻人领导的“日出运动”(Sunrise Movement)围绕着选举领导人优先考虑气候变化、结束对化石燃料的依赖、保证普遍可获得的生活工资这一概念而发展起来。拜登总统于2021年当选后不久,制定新新政的努力就增加了。拜登发布了一项行政命令,成立一个民间气候队,让年轻人参与到解决环境恶化的工作中来,这让人想起了早期的新政议程。民间自然资源保护团(CCC)是罗斯福总统的一个项目,它雇佣年轻人参与国家自然资源保护项目,植树和修建小径5月,国会议员刘云平(加州民主党)接过新政的衣袍,提出了《21世纪联邦作家计划法案》,该法案受到最初的作家计划的启发,该计划在全国范围内雇佣失业白领,通过国家指南、种族研究和第一人称访谈来描绘这个国家。刘云平的计划与此类似,但没有那么直接。联邦政府不会公开招聘作家,而是向非营利组织、图书馆和新闻来源提供资金,让苦苦挣扎的作家记录新冠病毒的影响,纪念逝去的生命同年8月,国会女议员Teresa Leger Fernandez(民主党)向众议院提交了《创意经济振兴法案》(CERA)。CERA与罗斯福新政的工作进步管理局(WPA)产生了共鸣,这是一个包括作家计划在内的工作救济计划。4就像提议的21世纪FWP一样,费尔南德斯的法案要求对失业者提供不那么直接的援助。取而代之的是,劳工部将与美国国家艺术基金会(National Endowment for the Arts,简称NEA)合作,为聘请艺术家创作无障碍艺术的组织提供资助。同年9月,本·雷·卢扬(民主党- nm)向参议院提出了同样的法案相反,政府对COVID-19的反应更加有限,持续时间更短,更少着眼于改变现状,而不是恢复现状。例如,对与COVID-19大流行作斗争的个人和组织的大部分支持都是通过救济法案形式的临时资金提供的,例如《关怀法案》(2020年)和《美国救援计划》(2021年)在地方、地区和州的层面上,新政式的努力取得了一些成功。2012年,纽约市人力资源管理局通过纽约工作进步计划(New York’s Work Progress Program)恢复了WPA,该计划为没有上学的年轻、低收入、失业人员提供工资补贴和职业培训。虽然在纽约州推广这一计划的尝试失败了,但加州在2020年设法制定了一项全州范围的艺术家和作家职业培训项目,尽管资金不足然而,这种弱化的程序维持的不仅仅是对系统的重新想象。一些模仿新政方法的最具创意的项目已经在大学、私人和非营利部门发展起来。例如,创意重建纽约是一个为期两年的艺术家就业计划,类似于联邦艺术计划。创意人员……
{"title":"Revisiting the New Deal in the Shadow of a Double Pandemic","authors":"Sharon Ann Musher","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911212","url":null,"abstract":"Revisiting the New Deal in the Shadow of a Double Pandemic Sharon Ann Musher (bio) Scott Borchert, Republic of Detours: How the New Deal Paid Broke Writers to Rediscover America. NY: Macmillan Publishers, 2021. 385 pp. Notes and index. $30. Mary Ann Calo, African American Artists and the New Deal Art Programs. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2023. 216 pp. Figures, notes, bibliography, and index. $74.95. Eric Rauchway, Why the New Deal Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021. 232 pp. Notes and index. $16. Sara Rutkowski, ed., Rewriting America: New Essays on the Federal Writers' Project. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2022. 264 pp. $30.95. Index. Jill Watts, The Black Cabinet: The Untold Story of African Americans and Politics During the Age of Roosevelt. NY: Grove Press, 2020. 560 pp. Figures, notes, bibliography, and index. $20. Today's politicians, activists, academics, writers, and artists regularly look to New Deal programs, rhetoric, and ideology to address contemporary challenges. In 2019, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) called for a Green New Deal through a bill introduced to the House.1 Although that bill was not enacted, the youth-led Sunrise Movement has grown around the concept of electing leaders to prioritize climate change, end reliance on fossil fuels, and guarantee universally accessible living wages. Shortly after President Biden's election in 2021, efforts to establish a new New Deal increased. Biden issued an Executive Order to create a Civilian Climate Corps that would put young people to work to tackle environmental degradation reminiscent of an earlier New Deal agenda. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was one of President Roosevelt's programs, employing young men on national conservation projects to plant trees and build trails.2 In May, Congressman Ted W. Lieu (D-CA) took up the New Deal mantle when he proposed a Twenty-First Century Federal Writers' Project Act, inspired by the original Writers' Project, [End Page 160] which hired unemployed white-collar workers across the nation to portray the country through State Guides, ethnic studies, and first-person interviews. Lieu's plan was similar but less direct. Rather than the federal government openly hiring writers, it would provide funds to non-profits, libraries, and news sources to engage struggling writers to document COVID's impact and honor lives lost.3 That August, Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-NM) presented the Creative Economy Revitalization Act (CERA) to the House. CERA resonated with the New Deal's Work Progress Administration (WPA), a work-relief program that included the Writers' Project.4 Like the proposed Twenty-First Century FWP, Fernandez's act called for less immediate aid to the unemployed. Instead, the Department of Labor would work with the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) to administer grants to organizations to hire artists to create accessible art. That September, Ben Ray Lujan (D-","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911205
David Igler
Telling California Stories David Igler (bio) John Mack Faragher, California: An American History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2022. ix + 466 pp. Illustrations, maps, bibliography, and index. $28.50. Assembling a history of California presents the narrative challenge of an overabundance of stories. Forget Hollywood with its longtime penchant for excavating the lurid past or its recent descent into remakes of remakes and plots driven by the sale of plastic action figures. Also forget advertisers, who have created and regurgitated versions of the California Dream since the 16th century, when Garci Rodríquez de Montalvo's novel Adventures of Esplandian placed California on the literary map as an island located off the western coast of North America. An island solely inhabited by gold-clad Amazons? The story sold well to Spanish adventurers, at least to those who could read. The challenge for historians who seek narrative coherence—as John Mack Faragher does in California: An American History—is one of selection and equilibrium. How to choose among the infinite number of Indigenous creation stories, or settler narratives, or shifty political schemes? How to achieve some balance between the region's violent and exclusionary past and its moments of human charity? Raised in the storied lands of southern California, Faragher has spent most of his scholarly life writing about topics situated well east of the Golden State. His monographs Women and Men on the Overland Trail (1979), Sugar Creek (1986) and A Great and Noble Scheme (2005) explored settler groups in motion and others temporarily fixed in place, while his biography Daniel Boone (1993) examined one of the nation's most written-about and mythologized citizens. With historian Robert Hine, Faragher authored two of the best synthetic accounts of the American West. In 2016, he returned to his southern California roots with Eternity Street: Violence and Justice in Frontier Los Angeles, which is among the most dark, brutal, and gripping histories written about any American city.1 It kept me reading late into the night in the same way a noir-mystery by Jo Nesbø or Kate Atkinson does. In short, John Mack Faragher knows how to tell a compelling story—one steeped in decades of his own archival research and a sense of place. A quick glance at the table of contents suggests California: An American History represents an odd assemblage of the state's past. It runs to over 440 [End Page 108] pages and contains 40 chapters, with titles like "What Happened to My Chickens?" and "My Little Sister's Heart in My Hands." Though delineating a state obsessed with its modern incarnation and rapid expansion in the 20th century, Faragher refuses to hit the year 1900 until two-thirds of the way into the book. For those of us unenthused by the overriding historical focus on modern California, we applaud Faragher's temporal bias for the deep past: the subduction zones and tectonics that formed this place, the Native stori
大卫·伊格勒(传记)约翰·麦克·法拉格,《加州:一部美国历史》。纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2022。ix + 466页。插图,地图,参考书目和索引。28.50美元。汇集加州的历史呈现了过多故事的叙事挑战。忘掉好莱坞长期以来对挖掘耸人听闻的过去的嗜好吧,也忘掉它最近在塑料玩具娃娃销售的推动下,陷入翻拍和情节的泥潭吧。也别忘了广告商,自16世纪以来,他们一直在创造和重复各种版本的加州梦,当时Garci Rodríquez de Montalvo的小说《Esplandian Adventures of Esplandian》将加利福尼亚作为一个位于北美西海岸外的岛屿放在文学地图上。一个只住着穿着金色衣服的亚马逊人的岛屿?这个故事很受西班牙冒险家的欢迎,至少对那些能读懂的人来说是这样。寻求叙事连贯性的历史学家面临的挑战——就像约翰·麦克·法拉格在《加州:美国历史》一书中所做的那样——是选择和平衡。如何在不计其数的土著创造故事、定居者叙事或诡谲的政治计划中做出选择?如何在该地区暴力和排外的过去与人类仁爱的时刻之间取得某种平衡?Faragher在南加州的传奇土地上长大,他的大部分学术生涯都在写关于金州东部的话题。他的专著《陆上小径上的女人和男人》(1979年)、《糖溪》(1986年)和《伟大而崇高的计划》(2005年)探讨了迁移中的移民群体和其他暂时固定在原地的群体,而他的传记《丹尼尔·布恩》(1993年)则研究了美国最受关注和最具神话色彩的公民之一。法拉格与历史学家罗伯特·海因(Robert Hine)合著了两本关于美国西部的最佳综合记述。2016年,他带着《永恒街:洛杉矶边境的暴力与正义》回到南加州,这是关于美国城市的最黑暗、最残酷、最扣人心弦的历史作品之一它让我一直读到深夜,就像乔·内斯博或凯特·阿特金森的黑色推理小说一样。简而言之,约翰·麦克·法拉格知道如何讲述一个引人入胜的故事——一个沉浸在他自己数十年的档案研究和地方感中的故事。快速浏览一下目录就会发现,《加州:美国历史》是加州历史的奇特组合。这本书长达440多页,包含40章,标题包括“我的鸡怎么了?”和“我妹妹的心在我手里”。虽然描绘了一个沉迷于其现代化身和20世纪快速扩张的国家,但法拉格直到书中三分之二的部分才提到1900年。对于我们这些对现代加利福尼亚的历史焦点不感兴趣的人来说,我们赞赏法拉格对过去的时间偏见:形成这个地方的俯冲带和构造,提供了多种开端的土著故事,挣扎的航海家和沿海社区之间的许多相遇,西班牙和墨西哥定居者殖民主义的持久遗产,以及美国公民在淘金热期间大量抵达后随之而来的混乱。淘金热之后(一直持续到20世纪)发生的事情包括国家支持的屠杀、排斥、合并,以及一些人对统治权力的短暂挑战。如果像该州伟大的编年史家凯里·麦克威廉姆斯(Carey McWilliams)所说的那样,淘金热“一下子亮起了灯”,那么“火焰”照亮了无数不和谐的片段和许多未实现的期望对于一个有着10000多年人类居住历史的曲折历史的地方,法拉格的穿越线是什么呢?“人类的多样性是加州历史的基础,”他写道,尽管这一真理几乎没有触及该地区社会历史的表面(第5页)。法拉格尔对土著多样性和坚持不懈的关注(尽管定居者竭尽全力消灭)代表了他最有效的中心主题之一。这本书从Konkow的一个村庄开始,以将祖先的土地归还给土著群体的当今紧张局势结束。在这些终点之间…
{"title":"Telling California Stories","authors":"David Igler","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911205","url":null,"abstract":"Telling California Stories David Igler (bio) John Mack Faragher, California: An American History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2022. ix + 466 pp. Illustrations, maps, bibliography, and index. $28.50. Assembling a history of California presents the narrative challenge of an overabundance of stories. Forget Hollywood with its longtime penchant for excavating the lurid past or its recent descent into remakes of remakes and plots driven by the sale of plastic action figures. Also forget advertisers, who have created and regurgitated versions of the California Dream since the 16th century, when Garci Rodríquez de Montalvo's novel Adventures of Esplandian placed California on the literary map as an island located off the western coast of North America. An island solely inhabited by gold-clad Amazons? The story sold well to Spanish adventurers, at least to those who could read. The challenge for historians who seek narrative coherence—as John Mack Faragher does in California: An American History—is one of selection and equilibrium. How to choose among the infinite number of Indigenous creation stories, or settler narratives, or shifty political schemes? How to achieve some balance between the region's violent and exclusionary past and its moments of human charity? Raised in the storied lands of southern California, Faragher has spent most of his scholarly life writing about topics situated well east of the Golden State. His monographs Women and Men on the Overland Trail (1979), Sugar Creek (1986) and A Great and Noble Scheme (2005) explored settler groups in motion and others temporarily fixed in place, while his biography Daniel Boone (1993) examined one of the nation's most written-about and mythologized citizens. With historian Robert Hine, Faragher authored two of the best synthetic accounts of the American West. In 2016, he returned to his southern California roots with Eternity Street: Violence and Justice in Frontier Los Angeles, which is among the most dark, brutal, and gripping histories written about any American city.1 It kept me reading late into the night in the same way a noir-mystery by Jo Nesbø or Kate Atkinson does. In short, John Mack Faragher knows how to tell a compelling story—one steeped in decades of his own archival research and a sense of place. A quick glance at the table of contents suggests California: An American History represents an odd assemblage of the state's past. It runs to over 440 [End Page 108] pages and contains 40 chapters, with titles like \"What Happened to My Chickens?\" and \"My Little Sister's Heart in My Hands.\" Though delineating a state obsessed with its modern incarnation and rapid expansion in the 20th century, Faragher refuses to hit the year 1900 until two-thirds of the way into the book. For those of us unenthused by the overriding historical focus on modern California, we applaud Faragher's temporal bias for the deep past: the subduction zones and tectonics that formed this place, the Native stori","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911204
Reed Gochberg
The Museum in Crisis Reed Gochberg (bio) Samuel J. Redman, The Museum: A Short History of Crisis and Resilience. New York: New York University Press, 2022. 232 pp. Notes and index. $24.95. On April 8, 2020, the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History announced a Rapid Response Collecting Task Force in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acknowledging "the urgency to document the ephemeral aspects of the historic turning points . . . and the need to provide a long-term historical perspective," the Smithsonian outlined a significant role for the museum during a period of major uncertainty.1 By pursuing objects from across different areas of American society, from science and medicine to business, politics, and culture, museum curators saw an opportunity to record the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of everyday life. These materials would ensure that such a crisis would not be forgotten, and they would allow future historians and members of the public to understand this significant moment in history. The crisis the Smithsonian sought to preserve was taking place not only outside the walls of museums, but also within them. Many museums remained closed for months in 2020 due to the pandemic, and even when they reopened, the consequences were deeply felt. Staff layoffs, new masking and distancing policies, and ongoing economic impacts all transformed the way museums had to operate. These closures also coincided with nationwide protests surrounding the murder of George Floyd in May 2020, which prompted a wider reckoning about racial injustice across American political, social, and cultural institutions. Some saw these challenges as a chance to rethink the role of a museum. An article for the American Alliance of Museums proclaimed that, "The museum we closed will not be the museum we reopen," suggesting a sense of tentative optimism that perhaps this pause in everyday operations might create space for reflection and an opportunity for change.2 Samuel Redman's recent book The Museum: A Short History of Crisis and Resilience reveals the much longer history of how museums have survived challenging times. Redman traces a set of key moments in American history throughout the twentieth century, including the influenza epidemic of 1918 and the Great Depression to World War II and the culture wars of the 1980s [End Page 103] and 1990s, situating the work of museums against the backdrop of major crises. Throughout this book, Redman defines museums as dynamic institutions, capable of shifting priorities and operations in order to respond actively to the needs of a given moment. The Museum: A Short History of Crisis and Resilience emphasizes that a crisis can also provide an opportunity to reflect on institutional values: "What are our main priorities? Whom do museums serve? How do cultural institutions continue to survive with curtailed operations? What operations are deemed 'essential'?" (p. 4). Such questions have enormous consequences f
《危机中的博物馆》(Reed Gochberg,传记)Samuel J. Redman,《博物馆:危机与复原力的简史》。纽约:纽约大学出版社,2022。232页。注释和索引。24.95美元。2020年4月8日,史密森尼美国国家历史博物馆宣布成立快速反应收集工作组,以应对COVID-19大流行。承认“迫切需要记录历史转折点的短暂方面……以及提供长期历史视角的必要性,”史密森尼概述了博物馆在这一重大不确定时期的重要作用通过从科学、医学到商业、政治和文化等美国社会不同领域的展品,博物馆馆长们看到了一个记录新冠疫情对日常生活方方面面影响的机会。这些材料将确保这样的危机不会被遗忘,它们将使未来的历史学家和公众能够理解这一重要的历史时刻。史密森学会试图保存的危机不仅发生在博物馆外,也发生在博物馆内。由于疫情,许多博物馆在2020年关闭了数月,即使重新开放,其后果也令人深感。员工裁员、新的掩蔽和隔离政策,以及持续的经济影响,都改变了博物馆的运营方式。这些关闭也恰逢2020年5月围绕乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀的全国性抗议活动,这促使人们对美国政治、社会和文化机构中的种族不公正现象进行了更广泛的反思。一些人认为这些挑战是重新思考博物馆角色的机会。美国博物馆联盟(American Alliance of Museums)的一篇文章宣称,“我们关闭的博物馆将不再是我们重新开放的博物馆”,这暗示了一种试探性的乐观情绪,也许这种日常运作的暂停可能会创造反思的空间和变革的机会塞缪尔·雷德曼(Samuel Redman)的新书《博物馆:危机和恢复力的简史》揭示了博物馆如何在充满挑战的时代中生存下来的更悠久的历史。雷德曼追溯了整个二十世纪美国历史上的一系列关键时刻,包括1918年的流感流行和大萧条,到第二次世界大战和20世纪80年代和90年代的文化战争,将博物馆的工作置于重大危机的背景下。在这本书中,雷德曼将博物馆定义为动态的机构,能够改变优先事项和操作,以积极响应特定时刻的需求。博物馆:危机和复原力的简史强调,危机也可以提供一个反思制度价值观的机会:“我们的主要优先事项是什么?博物馆为谁服务?文化机构如何在缩减运营的情况下继续生存?哪些操作被认为是‘必要的’?”这些问题对博物馆如何定义他们的观众和社区,如何理解他们的社会责任感,以及如何为未来的不确定时刻做好准备有着巨大的影响。Redman的工作证明了关注博物馆如何应对过去的挑战的重要性,以便更好地理解他们如何想象未来的替代方法。第一章讲述了一场当代读者可能会感到非常熟悉的危机:1918年被称为“西班牙流感”的流感大流行的影响,以及美国自然历史博物馆等博物馆如何试图驾驭和管理他们的应对措施。这一章强调了过去几年博物馆面临的许多挑战,包括游客人数下降,几年来缓慢而渐进的恢复,甚至使用口罩等策略来减轻疾病的传播。1918年流感大流行发生时,公共博物馆正经历着巨大的变革,通过展览向游客展示信息的新方法直到最近才开始流行。将博物馆作为公共教育空间的想法并不新鲜,但进步时代的教育和社会改革使这些问题在文化机构的世界中变得更加紧迫。因此,流感大流行带来的冲击和不确定性……
{"title":"The Museum in Crisis","authors":"Reed Gochberg","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911204","url":null,"abstract":"The Museum in Crisis Reed Gochberg (bio) Samuel J. Redman, The Museum: A Short History of Crisis and Resilience. New York: New York University Press, 2022. 232 pp. Notes and index. $24.95. On April 8, 2020, the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History announced a Rapid Response Collecting Task Force in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acknowledging \"the urgency to document the ephemeral aspects of the historic turning points . . . and the need to provide a long-term historical perspective,\" the Smithsonian outlined a significant role for the museum during a period of major uncertainty.1 By pursuing objects from across different areas of American society, from science and medicine to business, politics, and culture, museum curators saw an opportunity to record the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of everyday life. These materials would ensure that such a crisis would not be forgotten, and they would allow future historians and members of the public to understand this significant moment in history. The crisis the Smithsonian sought to preserve was taking place not only outside the walls of museums, but also within them. Many museums remained closed for months in 2020 due to the pandemic, and even when they reopened, the consequences were deeply felt. Staff layoffs, new masking and distancing policies, and ongoing economic impacts all transformed the way museums had to operate. These closures also coincided with nationwide protests surrounding the murder of George Floyd in May 2020, which prompted a wider reckoning about racial injustice across American political, social, and cultural institutions. Some saw these challenges as a chance to rethink the role of a museum. An article for the American Alliance of Museums proclaimed that, \"The museum we closed will not be the museum we reopen,\" suggesting a sense of tentative optimism that perhaps this pause in everyday operations might create space for reflection and an opportunity for change.2 Samuel Redman's recent book The Museum: A Short History of Crisis and Resilience reveals the much longer history of how museums have survived challenging times. Redman traces a set of key moments in American history throughout the twentieth century, including the influenza epidemic of 1918 and the Great Depression to World War II and the culture wars of the 1980s [End Page 103] and 1990s, situating the work of museums against the backdrop of major crises. Throughout this book, Redman defines museums as dynamic institutions, capable of shifting priorities and operations in order to respond actively to the needs of a given moment. The Museum: A Short History of Crisis and Resilience emphasizes that a crisis can also provide an opportunity to reflect on institutional values: \"What are our main priorities? Whom do museums serve? How do cultural institutions continue to survive with curtailed operations? What operations are deemed 'essential'?\" (p. 4). Such questions have enormous consequences f","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911213
Thomas G. Andrews
Ray, George, and Mabel:Friendship, Politics, and the Tragedies of American Liberalism Thomas G. Andrews (bio) Historians simultaneously react to and build upon the work of other scholars. At some point in our training—possibly as undergraduates but at least in the first year or two of graduate school—we should begin to treat the study of the resulting dynamics of critique, corroboration, and creative leaps forward as worthy of scrutiny in its own right. Often, the critical examination of historical literature and how it has changed over time, a pursuit which most now refer to as historiography, veers into rarefied theoretical debates or intricate methodological disputes.1 When we go to the trouble of considering our fellow historians as actual human beings as well as abstracted intellects, though, richer and more interesting vantage points on what historians do and why can open up. Historical work, like any other human endeavor, has always been and will always be shaped by personalities and personal relationships. Think back on your own career within the profession, and note how your triumphs and traumas have been shaped by your fellow historians. An unkind intellectual smackdown from a tyrannical advisor. A late-night round of drinks with kindred spirits at a conference hotel. A moment of frailty during a barbed exchange when another scholar's inability to hide their feelings belied the conceit that history could ever be a purely intellectual pursuit. An unbidden act of kindness from a senior scholar who needn't have but nonetheless did. A bond of true friendship forged amid the posturing and performativity that prevail with disconcerting predictability whenever scholars gather. In such moments, we can no longer overlook the irreducible humanity of the people who do the thing we collectively call history. The personal politics of history, as all of us realize sooner or later, story our field. Only rarely, though, do historians subject these peculiar, closely held narratives to systematic research or concerted analysis. Our reluctance to get personal is hardly surprising. Who among us, after all, can discern any margin in conceding just how much an enterprise that we frequently lionize, [End Page 177] particularly to undergraduates, as the "historians' craft," has been indelibly shaped not just by the disciplined endeavor of applying our intellects to the past's sundry remnants, but also by pettier factors including jealousy and envy, intimacy and alliance? Although each of us can testify about the ways that those and an array of other dynamics have affected our own careers, we nonetheless typically exhibit a concerted inclination to tuck away our own personal stories about how the historical sausage actually gets made into categories—lore, insider knowledge, trade secrets, gossip, dirt—that we almost always treat as unworthy of scrutiny. What I want to suggest in this essay, though, is that historians might learn a great deal about history and h
{"title":"Ray, George, and Mabel: Friendship, Politics, and the Tragedies of American Liberalism","authors":"Thomas G. Andrews","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911213","url":null,"abstract":"Ray, George, and Mabel:Friendship, Politics, and the Tragedies of American Liberalism Thomas G. Andrews (bio) Historians simultaneously react to and build upon the work of other scholars. At some point in our training—possibly as undergraduates but at least in the first year or two of graduate school—we should begin to treat the study of the resulting dynamics of critique, corroboration, and creative leaps forward as worthy of scrutiny in its own right. Often, the critical examination of historical literature and how it has changed over time, a pursuit which most now refer to as historiography, veers into rarefied theoretical debates or intricate methodological disputes.1 When we go to the trouble of considering our fellow historians as actual human beings as well as abstracted intellects, though, richer and more interesting vantage points on what historians do and why can open up. Historical work, like any other human endeavor, has always been and will always be shaped by personalities and personal relationships. Think back on your own career within the profession, and note how your triumphs and traumas have been shaped by your fellow historians. An unkind intellectual smackdown from a tyrannical advisor. A late-night round of drinks with kindred spirits at a conference hotel. A moment of frailty during a barbed exchange when another scholar's inability to hide their feelings belied the conceit that history could ever be a purely intellectual pursuit. An unbidden act of kindness from a senior scholar who needn't have but nonetheless did. A bond of true friendship forged amid the posturing and performativity that prevail with disconcerting predictability whenever scholars gather. In such moments, we can no longer overlook the irreducible humanity of the people who do the thing we collectively call history. The personal politics of history, as all of us realize sooner or later, story our field. Only rarely, though, do historians subject these peculiar, closely held narratives to systematic research or concerted analysis. Our reluctance to get personal is hardly surprising. Who among us, after all, can discern any margin in conceding just how much an enterprise that we frequently lionize, [End Page 177] particularly to undergraduates, as the \"historians' craft,\" has been indelibly shaped not just by the disciplined endeavor of applying our intellects to the past's sundry remnants, but also by pettier factors including jealousy and envy, intimacy and alliance? Although each of us can testify about the ways that those and an array of other dynamics have affected our own careers, we nonetheless typically exhibit a concerted inclination to tuck away our own personal stories about how the historical sausage actually gets made into categories—lore, insider knowledge, trade secrets, gossip, dirt—that we almost always treat as unworthy of scrutiny. What I want to suggest in this essay, though, is that historians might learn a great deal about history and h","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911209
Douglas R. Egerton
Rehabilitating the Beast Douglas R. Egerton (bio) Elizabeth D. Leonard, Benjamin Franklin Butler: A Noisy, Fearless Life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. xix + 365 pp. Notes, bibliography, and index. $36.00. General, congressman, and governor Benjamin Franklin Butler remains one of the more mercurial figures of the Civil War and Reconstruction years. As a young Democrat and attorney, Butler took the side of laboring women against the managers and owners of cotton mills in Lowell, Massachusetts, yet for most of the antebellum years, he was silent on the question of where that cotton came from. As a delegate to the 1860 Charleston and Baltimore Democratic conventions, Butler first endorsed Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas before transferring his loyalty to Mississippi's Jefferson Davis as the best hope of defeating a Republican presidential candidate, yet in his later years as a Republican congressman, many thought Butler the most likely progressive to take up the mantle of the ailing Thaddeus Stevens. Certainly, historians have rarely known what to make of his unpredictable career and flamboyant personality. Butler's inconsistencies soundly defeated biographer Hans Trefousse, who in Ben Butler: The South Called Him Beast! (1957) flattened his life into a dull affair, and as late as 1997's When the Devil Came Down to Dixie, Chester Hearn demonized his tenure in New Orleans as a charming rogue who devoted his time to enriching himself at the expense of white southerners. At last, Butler has received the proper balance in Elizabeth Leonard's masterful and elegantly written biography. Leonard, the author of numerous books about these decades, and particularly the Lincoln-Prize-winning biography of Judge Advocate General Joseph Holt, knows this terrain well, of course, but as a professor at Maine's Colby College, she is also associated with the institution once known as Waterville College, where Butler studied while briefly considering a life in the ministry. (Apart from the fact that Colby has a large cache of Butler's materials, the ever-helpful Butler attempted to assist his future biographers by writing Butler's Book: Autobiography and Personal Reminiscences (1892), which filled 1037 pages and contained another 94 pages of documents and correspondence.)1 As one has come to expect from her earlier work, Leonard's study is deeply [End Page 138] grounded in archival materials, cites ninety-eight newspapers, and draws on a small library of books and articles. Her prose is lively and clear and wonderfully free of jargon, and this is an extraordinarily readable biography for a fairly hefty volume. Although Butler is today famous, or infamous, perhaps, for his later exploits as a soldier and politician, Leonard makes wise use of his early correspondence, and that of his wife, Sarah Jones Butler, in mapping out his years as a young Democratic operative and defense attorney. Justifiably, she here finds much to admire. His support for
道格拉斯·r·埃格顿(传记)伊丽莎白·d·伦纳德,本杰明·富兰克林·巴特勒:喧闹无畏的生活。教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2022年。19 + 365页。注释,参考书目和索引。36.00美元。将军、国会议员和州长本杰明·富兰克林·巴特勒仍然是内战和重建时期最善变的人物之一。作为一名年轻的民主党人和律师,巴特勒站在劳动妇女的一边,反对马萨诸塞州洛厄尔市棉纺厂的经理和老板,但在内战前的大部分时间里,他对棉花从哪里来的问题保持沉默。作为1860年查尔斯顿和巴尔的摩民主党大会的代表,巴特勒先是支持伊利诺伊州参议员斯蒂芬·道格拉斯,然后又转而支持密西西比州的杰斐逊·戴维斯,认为他最有希望击败共和党总统候选人。然而,在他担任共和党国会议员的晚年,许多人认为巴特勒最有可能继承生病的塞迪斯·史蒂文斯的衣钵。当然,历史学家很少知道如何理解他不可预测的职业生涯和张扬的个性。巴特勒的前后矛盾彻底击败了传记作家汉斯·特雷福斯,他在《本·巴特勒:南方称他为野兽!》直到1997年的《当魔鬼降临到迪克西》,切斯特·赫恩还把他在新奥尔良的任期妖魔化为一个迷人的流氓,他把时间都花在了牺牲南方白人的利益上,让自己变得富有。最后,巴特勒在伊丽莎白·伦纳德这本精湛而优雅的传记中得到了适当的平衡。伦纳德写了很多关于这几十年的书,尤其是获得林肯奖的大法官约瑟夫·霍尔特的传记,当然,她对这方面非常了解,但作为缅因州科尔比学院的教授,她也与曾经被称为沃特维尔学院的机构有联系,巴特勒曾在那里学习过,并短暂地考虑过牧师的生活。(除了科尔比拥有大量巴特勒的资料外,总是乐于助人的巴特勒还试图通过撰写巴特勒的书来帮助他未来的传记作者:《自传与个人回忆》(Autobiography and Personal Reminiscences, 1892),长达1037页,其中包含另外94页的文件和信件。1正如人们从她早期的作品中所期望的那样,伦纳德的研究深深扎根于档案材料,引用了98份报纸,并利用了一个小图书馆的书籍和文章。她的文笔生动清晰,没有行话,这是一本相当厚的传记,可读性极佳。尽管巴特勒后来作为军人和政治家的功绩在今天很出名,或者是臭名昭著,但伦纳德明智地利用了他早期的信件,以及他妻子莎拉·琼斯·巴特勒的信件,描绘了他年轻时作为民主党特工和辩护律师的岁月。毫无疑问,她在这里发现了很多值得钦佩的地方。他对进步改革的支持,如无记名投票和在洛厄尔工厂每天工作十小时,为他在辉格党报刊上赢得了大量负面报道。在1853年赢得马萨诸塞州议会席位后,巴特勒起草了一份法案,以补偿20年前被烧毁的查尔斯敦乌尔苏拉修道院和学校。考虑到当时在新英格兰肆虐的反天主教本土主义,巴特勒对他的法案失败并不感到惊讶,但正如他向一位支持者透露的那样,当他认为有人“被冤枉了”时,他的“精神状态”总是让他“在战斗中站在弱者一边”。与此同时,他反对为波士顿地区提供更多的州议会席位,因为波士顿地区的商人坚持认为,他们应该获得更多的代表席位,因为他们缴纳了更多的税款。巴特勒宣称,州政府不应该“给富人比穷人投更多票的权利”(第35-37页)。如果说巴特勒的言论与其他北方民主党人的看法一致,那么他也是他所在政党和地区的典型代表,他希望忽视西部地区围绕奴隶制的斗争。巴特勒最初是道格拉斯和人民主权的支持者,但他开始怀疑这位民主党领跑者能否在即将到来的总统竞选中赢得选举人团。虽然他……
{"title":"Rehabilitating the Beast","authors":"Douglas R. Egerton","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911209","url":null,"abstract":"Rehabilitating the Beast Douglas R. Egerton (bio) Elizabeth D. Leonard, Benjamin Franklin Butler: A Noisy, Fearless Life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. xix + 365 pp. Notes, bibliography, and index. $36.00. General, congressman, and governor Benjamin Franklin Butler remains one of the more mercurial figures of the Civil War and Reconstruction years. As a young Democrat and attorney, Butler took the side of laboring women against the managers and owners of cotton mills in Lowell, Massachusetts, yet for most of the antebellum years, he was silent on the question of where that cotton came from. As a delegate to the 1860 Charleston and Baltimore Democratic conventions, Butler first endorsed Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas before transferring his loyalty to Mississippi's Jefferson Davis as the best hope of defeating a Republican presidential candidate, yet in his later years as a Republican congressman, many thought Butler the most likely progressive to take up the mantle of the ailing Thaddeus Stevens. Certainly, historians have rarely known what to make of his unpredictable career and flamboyant personality. Butler's inconsistencies soundly defeated biographer Hans Trefousse, who in Ben Butler: The South Called Him Beast! (1957) flattened his life into a dull affair, and as late as 1997's When the Devil Came Down to Dixie, Chester Hearn demonized his tenure in New Orleans as a charming rogue who devoted his time to enriching himself at the expense of white southerners. At last, Butler has received the proper balance in Elizabeth Leonard's masterful and elegantly written biography. Leonard, the author of numerous books about these decades, and particularly the Lincoln-Prize-winning biography of Judge Advocate General Joseph Holt, knows this terrain well, of course, but as a professor at Maine's Colby College, she is also associated with the institution once known as Waterville College, where Butler studied while briefly considering a life in the ministry. (Apart from the fact that Colby has a large cache of Butler's materials, the ever-helpful Butler attempted to assist his future biographers by writing Butler's Book: Autobiography and Personal Reminiscences (1892), which filled 1037 pages and contained another 94 pages of documents and correspondence.)1 As one has come to expect from her earlier work, Leonard's study is deeply [End Page 138] grounded in archival materials, cites ninety-eight newspapers, and draws on a small library of books and articles. Her prose is lively and clear and wonderfully free of jargon, and this is an extraordinarily readable biography for a fairly hefty volume. Although Butler is today famous, or infamous, perhaps, for his later exploits as a soldier and politician, Leonard makes wise use of his early correspondence, and that of his wife, Sarah Jones Butler, in mapping out his years as a young Democratic operative and defense attorney. Justifiably, she here finds much to admire. His support for ","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"47 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911210
Katrina Jagodinsky
Pioneers, Parricides, and the Spectre of Violence in Settler-Colonial Homes and Histories Katrina Jagodinsky (bio) Peter Boag, Pioneering Death: The Violence of Boyhood in Turn-of-the-Century Oregon. Seattle: Center for the Study of the Pacific Northwest in association with University of Washington Press, 2022. xii + 298 pp. Figures, maps, chart, notes, bibliography, and index. $30.00 Americans are grappling with everyday political and personal violence on a variety of fronts. Escalating frustrations with alternating police inaction and violence, failed explanations of gender- and racially motivated mass-shootings, and the heartbreaking centrality of children in this violence—as both victims and perpetrators—leave many onlookers desperate to understand how these acts have come to be so distinctly American. A cadre of scholars are focused on this problem: criminologists, lawyers, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, and, applying their own unique set of tools and methodologies, historians.1 Among the historians concerned with the peculiarities of American violence are those who specialize in the North American West, a region characterized in the popular imagination and in most scholarly treatments as fundamentally violent.2 Peter Boag's most recent book, Pioneering Death: The Violence of Boyhood in Turn-of-the-Century Oregon (2022), joins this conversation, arguing that violence is intrinsic to American culture, particularly pioneering culture. Boag borrows an approach from Foucault to offer readers an "ethnology of parricide" (p. 9) that links a horrific "fifteen or so minutes" to "the westward expansion of the United States, rural and agricultural decline, the consolidation of market capitalism, political change, environmental transformation, race and labor, penal reform and the evolution of justice, religion and the meaning of death, and the especially intimate matters of childhood, family, gender relations, and memory" (p. 10).3 What unfolds is a compelling story that incorporates a diverse set of analytical methods to describe an eighteen year-old's parricide and murder in the 1895 Willamette Valley and explain "why children kill their parents–a question that has haunted humanity since humanity has haunted the world" (p. 217). [End Page 143] At the core of Boag's study is Loyd Montgomery's parricide of his father and mother, John and Elizabeth, and murder of neighbor Daniel McKercher on 19 November, 1895. The eldest of five siblings at eighteen, Loyd stood at the intersection of boyhood and manhood, though his heinous actions ensured he would face execution before completing that transformation—unless we believe his murderous acts marked the end of his childhood. His parents, John and Elizabeth, were the children of Oregon founding families who had themselves practiced genocidal anti-Indian violence to secure their settler-colonial claims to the Willamette Valley in the 1840s and 1850s. As adults and parents of the Valley's thir
{"title":"Pioneers, Parricides, and the Spectre of Violence in Settler-Colonial Homes and Histories","authors":"Katrina Jagodinsky","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911210","url":null,"abstract":"Pioneers, Parricides, and the Spectre of Violence in Settler-Colonial Homes and Histories Katrina Jagodinsky (bio) Peter Boag, Pioneering Death: The Violence of Boyhood in Turn-of-the-Century Oregon. Seattle: Center for the Study of the Pacific Northwest in association with University of Washington Press, 2022. xii + 298 pp. Figures, maps, chart, notes, bibliography, and index. $30.00 Americans are grappling with everyday political and personal violence on a variety of fronts. Escalating frustrations with alternating police inaction and violence, failed explanations of gender- and racially motivated mass-shootings, and the heartbreaking centrality of children in this violence—as both victims and perpetrators—leave many onlookers desperate to understand how these acts have come to be so distinctly American. A cadre of scholars are focused on this problem: criminologists, lawyers, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, and, applying their own unique set of tools and methodologies, historians.1 Among the historians concerned with the peculiarities of American violence are those who specialize in the North American West, a region characterized in the popular imagination and in most scholarly treatments as fundamentally violent.2 Peter Boag's most recent book, Pioneering Death: The Violence of Boyhood in Turn-of-the-Century Oregon (2022), joins this conversation, arguing that violence is intrinsic to American culture, particularly pioneering culture. Boag borrows an approach from Foucault to offer readers an \"ethnology of parricide\" (p. 9) that links a horrific \"fifteen or so minutes\" to \"the westward expansion of the United States, rural and agricultural decline, the consolidation of market capitalism, political change, environmental transformation, race and labor, penal reform and the evolution of justice, religion and the meaning of death, and the especially intimate matters of childhood, family, gender relations, and memory\" (p. 10).3 What unfolds is a compelling story that incorporates a diverse set of analytical methods to describe an eighteen year-old's parricide and murder in the 1895 Willamette Valley and explain \"why children kill their parents–a question that has haunted humanity since humanity has haunted the world\" (p. 217). [End Page 143] At the core of Boag's study is Loyd Montgomery's parricide of his father and mother, John and Elizabeth, and murder of neighbor Daniel McKercher on 19 November, 1895. The eldest of five siblings at eighteen, Loyd stood at the intersection of boyhood and manhood, though his heinous actions ensured he would face execution before completing that transformation—unless we believe his murderous acts marked the end of his childhood. His parents, John and Elizabeth, were the children of Oregon founding families who had themselves practiced genocidal anti-Indian violence to secure their settler-colonial claims to the Willamette Valley in the 1840s and 1850s. As adults and parents of the Valley's thir","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911214
Sarah Schrank
American Fitness:Gender, Wellness, and the New Body Politic Sarah Schrank (bio) Bill Hayes, Sweat: A History of Exercise. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022. 246 pp. Figures, notes, and index. $28.00 Danielle Friedman, Let's Get Physical: How Women Discovered Exercise and Reshaped the World. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 2022. xxiii +328 pp. Figures, notes, and index. $27.00 Rina Raphael, The Gospel of Wellness: Gyms, Gurus, Goop, and the False Promise of Self-Care. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2022. 345 pp. Notes. $28.99 Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, Fit Nation: The Gains and Pains of America's Exercise Obsession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. 424 pp. Figures, notes, and index. $29.00 Annie Weisman, creator. Physical. Apple TV+, Seasons 1 and 2. 2021–2022. Among the many challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic was the uncomfortably embodied nature of the experience. Millions of people got sick, millions died, millions felt physically trapped—unable to travel distances or even leave their homes—millions found it hard to get basic supplies, and millions discovered that, at some cost to waistline and bankbook, alcohol and food delivery services could smooth the pandemic's rougher edges. Millions also suffered great loneliness caused by physical isolation while others, conversely, suffered upticks in domestic violence as forced proximity stressed relationships to the breaking point.1 Surgical masks became rarified items, and wearing homemade masks became a political signifier. We might not be able to see each other's faces but we could read positionality through the body—is the mask covering their nose? Is their body six feet away from mine? In the United States, along with the closure of schools and workplaces, the 2020 shuttering of gyms, health clubs, yoga shalas, and dance studios brought [End Page 198] home the stark reality that familiar life had altered—possibly forever. Panic set in. Americans who incorporated exercise into their daily routines had to make changes very quickly. Those who could afford to invested in home gyms; there was a run on kettlebells almost immediately. Peloton, a company many of us had never heard of, became, practically overnight, a bourgeois household utility. The global adoption of Zoom meant that people could take live exercise classes of all types from the safety and convenience of their own homes. Some people started walking their dogs a lot more than their pets needed while others just threw in the towel. Who cares about BMI (body mass index) when the world feels like it's ending? As it turns out, we do care—often for conflicting and self-defeating reasons—and there is a bumper crop of new work to prove it. That it was all brought to press (or air) during the pandemic is a coincidence, as the projects had to be in production—or at least conceived—long before, but it is hard not to see the zeitgeist in it, too. Readers of Reviews in American History surely remember the almost daily editorials and o
{"title":"American Fitness: Gender, Wellness, and the New Body Politic","authors":"Sarah Schrank","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911214","url":null,"abstract":"American Fitness:Gender, Wellness, and the New Body Politic Sarah Schrank (bio) Bill Hayes, Sweat: A History of Exercise. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022. 246 pp. Figures, notes, and index. $28.00 Danielle Friedman, Let's Get Physical: How Women Discovered Exercise and Reshaped the World. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 2022. xxiii +328 pp. Figures, notes, and index. $27.00 Rina Raphael, The Gospel of Wellness: Gyms, Gurus, Goop, and the False Promise of Self-Care. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2022. 345 pp. Notes. $28.99 Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, Fit Nation: The Gains and Pains of America's Exercise Obsession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. 424 pp. Figures, notes, and index. $29.00 Annie Weisman, creator. Physical. Apple TV+, Seasons 1 and 2. 2021–2022. Among the many challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic was the uncomfortably embodied nature of the experience. Millions of people got sick, millions died, millions felt physically trapped—unable to travel distances or even leave their homes—millions found it hard to get basic supplies, and millions discovered that, at some cost to waistline and bankbook, alcohol and food delivery services could smooth the pandemic's rougher edges. Millions also suffered great loneliness caused by physical isolation while others, conversely, suffered upticks in domestic violence as forced proximity stressed relationships to the breaking point.1 Surgical masks became rarified items, and wearing homemade masks became a political signifier. We might not be able to see each other's faces but we could read positionality through the body—is the mask covering their nose? Is their body six feet away from mine? In the United States, along with the closure of schools and workplaces, the 2020 shuttering of gyms, health clubs, yoga shalas, and dance studios brought [End Page 198] home the stark reality that familiar life had altered—possibly forever. Panic set in. Americans who incorporated exercise into their daily routines had to make changes very quickly. Those who could afford to invested in home gyms; there was a run on kettlebells almost immediately. Peloton, a company many of us had never heard of, became, practically overnight, a bourgeois household utility. The global adoption of Zoom meant that people could take live exercise classes of all types from the safety and convenience of their own homes. Some people started walking their dogs a lot more than their pets needed while others just threw in the towel. Who cares about BMI (body mass index) when the world feels like it's ending? As it turns out, we do care—often for conflicting and self-defeating reasons—and there is a bumper crop of new work to prove it. That it was all brought to press (or air) during the pandemic is a coincidence, as the projects had to be in production—or at least conceived—long before, but it is hard not to see the zeitgeist in it, too. Readers of Reviews in American History surely remember the almost daily editorials and o","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a911207
Chris Magra
Making America Not Great Chris Magra (bio) Dane A. Morrison, Eastward of Good Hope: Early America in a Dangerous World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xv + 314 pp. Notes, sources, and index. $57.00. There has been much recent interest in interactions between the United States and the rest of the world. America's dependence on Chinese manufacturers and shipping companies, red balloons with spy cameras, and TikTok tech have grabbed the attention of politicians, historians, and the wider public. A United States president and multiple state governors have played on popular xenophobic fears and toxic nationalism in a wild effort to make America great again. Historians have engaged with this public interest in America and the world.1 Dael Norwood in Trading Freedom (2022) and Brian Rouleau in With Sails Whitening Every Sea (2014), for example, have demonstrated that overseas trade and foreign entanglements shaped the course of early American political culture. For Norwood, United States commercial ties with China "put American merchants and sailors into direct contact with a vast array of new peoples and places, and at critical moments it inspired policymakers and politicians to consider national projects and domestic disputes in global perspective" (p. 10). In this top-down history, overseas commerce turned early American political leaders into cosmopolitans, and they began to associate world trade with freedom, or post-American-Revolution "liberation from the mercantilist confines of the British Empire" (p. 20).2 Rouleau tacks a different course. For him, "every barroom brawl, stabbing, or other violent incident" involving American mariners in overseas ports in China and throughout the Pacific Ocean, "jeopardized connections the United States (and its commercial class) had built with foreign governments (and their own merchants)." (p. 106) Controlling misbehaving maritime laborers became a means of sustaining global capitalism and America's burgeoning overseas empire. In this bottom-up account, early American maritime laborers were not cosmopolitans. Overseas trade did not foster worldly accommodationist attitudes among motley crews. Instead, they used contemporary notions of savage and civilized to describe themselves and the foreign peoples they encountered. Mariners frequently likened Pacific Islanders to negative stereotypes of American Indians. These [End Page 121] attitudes led at times to physical violence. Such "racialized vigilantism" even caused colonization in the case of Hawaii (p. 85). Dane Morrison's prize-winning new book, Eastward of Good Hope, further positions the early history of the United States in a global context. Morrison's book leans more toward Rouleau's bottom-up approach. For Morrison, increased interest in world trade meant greater antipathy among American merchants and mariners toward foreign peoples and places during the Early Republic, when U.S. attitudes were in their most formative state. The winner
克里斯·麦格拉(传记)戴恩·a·莫里森,《美好希望的东方:危险世界中的早期美国》。巴尔的摩:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社,2021。xv + 314页。注释,来源和索引。57.00美元。最近,人们对美国与世界其他地区的互动产生了浓厚的兴趣。美国对中国制造商和航运公司的依赖、带有间谍摄像头的红气球以及TikTok技术已经引起了政治家、历史学家和更广泛公众的注意。一位美国总统和多位州长利用民众的仇外恐惧和有害的民族主义,疯狂地试图让美国再次伟大。历史学家一直致力于研究美国和世界的这种公众利益例如,达尔·诺伍德在《贸易自由》(2022)和布莱恩·鲁罗在《风帆泛白每一片海洋》(2014)中表明,海外贸易和外国纠纷战塑造了早期美国政治文化的进程。对诺伍德来说,美国与中国的商业关系“使美国商人和水手与大量新的民族和地方直接接触,并在关键时刻激励决策者和政治家从全球视角考虑国家项目和国内争端”(第10页)。在这段自上而下的历史中,海外贸易把早期的美国政治领导人变成了世界主义者,他们开始把世界贸易与自由联系起来,或者美国革命后“从大英帝国的重商主义束缚中解放出来”(第20页)鲁罗采取了不同的做法。在他看来,在中国和整个太平洋的海外港口,涉及美国水手的“每一次酒吧斗殴、刺伤或其他暴力事件”,“都破坏了美国(及其商业阶层)与外国政府(及其本国商人)建立的联系”。控制行为不端的海上劳工成为维持全球资本主义和美国迅速发展的海外帝国的一种手段。在这种自下而上的叙述中,早期的美国海上劳工并不是世界主义者。海外贸易并没有在形形色色的船员中培养世俗的迁就主义态度。相反,他们用野蛮和文明的当代概念来描述自己和他们遇到的外国民族。水手们经常把太平洋岛民比作对美洲印第安人的负面刻板印象。这些态度有时会导致身体暴力。这种“种族化的警戒主义”甚至导致了夏威夷的殖民化(第85页)。戴恩·莫里森(Dane Morrison)的获奖新书《好望角的东方》(east of Good Hope)进一步将美国的早期历史置于全球背景下。莫里森的书更倾向于鲁罗自下而上的方法。对莫里森来说,在共和早期,美国人的态度处于最形成的状态,对世界贸易的兴趣增加意味着美国商人和水手对外国人民和地方的更大反感。这位约翰·莱曼图书奖得主尖锐地指出,“美国人想象的世界是无序和危险的,被暴政搞得精神错乱,或者沉浸在混乱之中,往往是致命的,总是不确定的,不可预测的,不稳定的……这种世界观,比其他任何东西都更能塑造美国人对自己在世界上的地位的看法”(第8页)。在研究生研讨会上,宏大而大胆的论点会促成良好的讨论。莫里森在整本书中都坚持自己的观点。美国与世界之间大量的直接、长途贸易并没有以积极的方式塑造美国文化的轮廓。海上贸易并没有产生美国的世界主义者或世界公民。相反,海外贸易刺激了美国早期的仇外情绪。作者整理了大量的证据来证明他的观点。莫里森着重分析了美国人对四个地区的态度:奥斯曼帝国;中国;印度;以及包括东印度群岛、大洋洲和北美太平洋西北部分的大南海。毫无疑问,年轻和年老的学者们会喜欢讨论这四个地区在多大程度上构成了“世界”3(第viii页)。莫里森主要依靠水手的新闻报道、船只的日志、日记、囚禁和旅行的叙述,以及商人之间的通信来记录美国人对这四个地区的人民和地方的恐惧的形成。莫里森在研究方法上既注重理论,又一丝不苟。他利用洛吉亚·加西亚-佩纳关于档案沉默的后殖民理论来揭示十八世纪……
{"title":"Making America Not Great","authors":"Chris Magra","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911207","url":null,"abstract":"Making America Not Great Chris Magra (bio) Dane A. Morrison, Eastward of Good Hope: Early America in a Dangerous World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xv + 314 pp. Notes, sources, and index. $57.00. There has been much recent interest in interactions between the United States and the rest of the world. America's dependence on Chinese manufacturers and shipping companies, red balloons with spy cameras, and TikTok tech have grabbed the attention of politicians, historians, and the wider public. A United States president and multiple state governors have played on popular xenophobic fears and toxic nationalism in a wild effort to make America great again. Historians have engaged with this public interest in America and the world.1 Dael Norwood in Trading Freedom (2022) and Brian Rouleau in With Sails Whitening Every Sea (2014), for example, have demonstrated that overseas trade and foreign entanglements shaped the course of early American political culture. For Norwood, United States commercial ties with China \"put American merchants and sailors into direct contact with a vast array of new peoples and places, and at critical moments it inspired policymakers and politicians to consider national projects and domestic disputes in global perspective\" (p. 10). In this top-down history, overseas commerce turned early American political leaders into cosmopolitans, and they began to associate world trade with freedom, or post-American-Revolution \"liberation from the mercantilist confines of the British Empire\" (p. 20).2 Rouleau tacks a different course. For him, \"every barroom brawl, stabbing, or other violent incident\" involving American mariners in overseas ports in China and throughout the Pacific Ocean, \"jeopardized connections the United States (and its commercial class) had built with foreign governments (and their own merchants).\" (p. 106) Controlling misbehaving maritime laborers became a means of sustaining global capitalism and America's burgeoning overseas empire. In this bottom-up account, early American maritime laborers were not cosmopolitans. Overseas trade did not foster worldly accommodationist attitudes among motley crews. Instead, they used contemporary notions of savage and civilized to describe themselves and the foreign peoples they encountered. Mariners frequently likened Pacific Islanders to negative stereotypes of American Indians. These [End Page 121] attitudes led at times to physical violence. Such \"racialized vigilantism\" even caused colonization in the case of Hawaii (p. 85). Dane Morrison's prize-winning new book, Eastward of Good Hope, further positions the early history of the United States in a global context. Morrison's book leans more toward Rouleau's bottom-up approach. For Morrison, increased interest in world trade meant greater antipathy among American merchants and mariners toward foreign peoples and places during the Early Republic, when U.S. attitudes were in their most formative state. The winner","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135195494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a900725
Cecily N. Zander
{"title":"Whither the Radicals?","authors":"Cecily N. Zander","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a900725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a900725","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"51 1","pages":"102 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42400724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1353/rah.2023.a900723
P. Coclanis
In 2004 I served as a member of the program committee for the annual meeting of a major historical association. The committee’s first task was to draft a call for papers. The association had already chosen a broad theme for the meeting, but wanted us to signal that proposals on topics other than that theme were acceptable. I suggested something like proposals on “other important topics were welcome,” but several committee members immediately objected on the grounds that the adjective “important” implied normativity. I then offered alternative language—proposals on “other important and unimportant topics were welcome”—but that didn’t fly either. I start with this story because the profession was then smack dab in the middle of a long, drawn-out battle against (flight from?) concepts such as objectivity, critical discernment, and judgements regarding value. Syntheses were ipso facto considered imperializing/hegemonizing, and thus increasingly frowned upon. Grand narratives were pretty much out altogether. For the most part, mainstream history at the time was about disaggregation, about smaller parallel stories, micro-histories, and multiple perspectives, indeed, even multiple conceptions of “truth”—whether personal (“my truth,” as it was sometimes put), or, alternatively, what Shelby Steele later called “poetic truth”, i.e., a distorted partisan version of reality espoused in order to promote a preferred ideological outcome.1 Fortunately, the worm has turned, as it were, and of late things have begun to change, to which Slouching Towards Utopia attests. Syntheses and grand narratives, while not exactly in, are no longer endangered species. To be sure, it still takes considerable chutzpah for someone to attempt one, but they are no longer rarae aves. If it is possible to generalize about a group qua group, the tribe known as economists, for better or worse (possibly both) can be said to be imbued with chutzpah, few more so than J. Bradford DeLong, a distinguished economic historian at the University of California-Berkeley. And I say this not
{"title":"Slouching Towards Utopia: An Economic History of the Twentieth Century by J. Bradford DeLong (review)","authors":"P. Coclanis","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a900723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a900723","url":null,"abstract":"In 2004 I served as a member of the program committee for the annual meeting of a major historical association. The committee’s first task was to draft a call for papers. The association had already chosen a broad theme for the meeting, but wanted us to signal that proposals on topics other than that theme were acceptable. I suggested something like proposals on “other important topics were welcome,” but several committee members immediately objected on the grounds that the adjective “important” implied normativity. I then offered alternative language—proposals on “other important and unimportant topics were welcome”—but that didn’t fly either. I start with this story because the profession was then smack dab in the middle of a long, drawn-out battle against (flight from?) concepts such as objectivity, critical discernment, and judgements regarding value. Syntheses were ipso facto considered imperializing/hegemonizing, and thus increasingly frowned upon. Grand narratives were pretty much out altogether. For the most part, mainstream history at the time was about disaggregation, about smaller parallel stories, micro-histories, and multiple perspectives, indeed, even multiple conceptions of “truth”—whether personal (“my truth,” as it was sometimes put), or, alternatively, what Shelby Steele later called “poetic truth”, i.e., a distorted partisan version of reality espoused in order to promote a preferred ideological outcome.1 Fortunately, the worm has turned, as it were, and of late things have begun to change, to which Slouching Towards Utopia attests. Syntheses and grand narratives, while not exactly in, are no longer endangered species. To be sure, it still takes considerable chutzpah for someone to attempt one, but they are no longer rarae aves. If it is possible to generalize about a group qua group, the tribe known as economists, for better or worse (possibly both) can be said to be imbued with chutzpah, few more so than J. Bradford DeLong, a distinguished economic historian at the University of California-Berkeley. And I say this not","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"51 1","pages":"68 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47109111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}