首页 > 最新文献

Monash Bioethics Review最新文献

英文 中文
Personal reflections on navigating plural values in the implementation of voluntary assisted dying in Victoria, Australia. 澳大利亚维多利亚州在实施自愿协助死亡过程中引导多元价值观的个人思考。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00209-y
Margaret O'Connor

This paper is a personal reflection on involvement in the development of the first voluntary assisted dying legislation in Australia. Points of contention are discussed, where plural values were evident, as the legislation progressed towards implementation. Finally, ongoing areas of difficulty with the legislation are listed, where further thought is required to ensure ease of access for those in need.

本文是对参与制定澳大利亚首部自愿协助死亡立法的个人反思。本文讨论了立法实施过程中出现的争议点,这些争议点体现了多元价值观。最后,列出了该立法目前存在的困难,需要进一步思考,以确保有需要的人能够方便地获得帮助。
{"title":"Personal reflections on navigating plural values in the implementation of voluntary assisted dying in Victoria, Australia.","authors":"Margaret O'Connor","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00209-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00209-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper is a personal reflection on involvement in the development of the first voluntary assisted dying legislation in Australia. Points of contention are discussed, where plural values were evident, as the legislation progressed towards implementation. Finally, ongoing areas of difficulty with the legislation are listed, where further thought is required to ensure ease of access for those in need.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antibiotic prescription, dispensing and use in humans and livestock in East Africa: does morality have a role to play? 东非人类和牲畜的抗生素处方、配药和使用:道德是否起作用?
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00208-z
Edna Mutua, A Davis, E Laurie, T Lembo, M Melubo, K Mnzava, E Msoka, F Nasua, T Ndibohoye, R Zadoks, B Mmbaga, S Mshana

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to human and livestock health. Although AMR is driven by use of antimicrobials, it is often attributed to "misuse" and "overuse", particularly for antibiotics. To curb resistance, there has been a global call to embrace new forms of moral personhood that practice "proper" use, including prescription, dispensing and consumption of antimicrobials, especially antibiotics. This paper seeks to reflect on complex questions about how morality has become embedded /embodied in the AMR discourse as presented in the data collected on antimicrobial prescription, dispensing and use in human and livestock health in Tanzania, primarily focusing on antibiotics.

Methods: This reflection is anchored on Jarrett Zigon's morality framework that is comprised of three dimensions of discourse; the institutional, public, and embodied dispositions. The data we use within this framework are derived from a qualitative study targeting human and animal health care service providers and community members in northern Tanzania. Data were collected through 28 in-depth interviews and ten focus group discussions and analysed through content analysis after translation and transcription. In addition, a review of the Tanzania's National Action Plans on antimicrobial resistance was conducted.

Results: Application of the framework demonstrates points of convergence and divergence in the institutional morality discourse articulated by the Tanzania National Action Plans, the public discourse and the embodied dispositions/ lived experiences of human and animal health care service providers and community members. We demonstrate that AMR is not just associated with "inappropriate" behaviour on the part of drug prescribers, dispensers, and users but also with shortcomings in health systems and service delivery.

Conclusion: Antibiotic dispensing and use practices that may be associated with the development of AMR should not be viewed in isolation from the broader health context within which they occur.

背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是对人类和牲畜健康的全球性威胁。虽然抗菌素耐药性是由抗菌素的使用引起的,但它往往被归咎于 "滥用 "和 "过度使用",尤其是抗生素。为了遏制抗药性,全球呼吁接受新形式的道德人格,践行 "正确 "使用,包括处方、配药和使用抗菌药物,尤其是抗生素。本文旨在反思有关道德如何嵌入/体现在急性呼吸道感染(AMR)论述中的复杂问题,正如所收集的有关坦桑尼亚人类和牲畜健康中抗菌药处方、配发和使用的数据所呈现的那样,主要侧重于抗生素:本思考以贾勒特-齐贡(Jarrett Zigon)的道德框架为基础,该框架由三个方面的话语组成:机构、公众和体现性处置。我们在这一框架内使用的数据来自一项定性研究,研究对象是坦桑尼亚北部的人类和动物医疗服务提供者及社区成员。我们通过 28 次深入访谈和 10 次焦点小组讨论收集数据,并在翻译和转录后通过内容分析对数据进行了分析。此外,还对坦桑尼亚的抗菌药耐药性国家行动计划进行了审查:结果:该框架的应用表明,坦桑尼亚国家行动计划所阐述的机构道德论述、公共论述以及人类和动物医疗保健服务提供者及社区成员的体现性处置/生活经验中存在着趋同和分歧点。我们证明,AMR 不仅与处方者、配药者和使用者的 "不当 "行为有关,还与卫生系统和服务提供方面的缺陷有关:结论:抗生素配发和使用方法可能与 AMR 的发展有关,不应脱离其发生的更广泛的健康背景来看待。
{"title":"Antibiotic prescription, dispensing and use in humans and livestock in East Africa: does morality have a role to play?","authors":"Edna Mutua, A Davis, E Laurie, T Lembo, M Melubo, K Mnzava, E Msoka, F Nasua, T Ndibohoye, R Zadoks, B Mmbaga, S Mshana","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00208-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00208-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to human and livestock health. Although AMR is driven by use of antimicrobials, it is often attributed to \"misuse\" and \"overuse\", particularly for antibiotics. To curb resistance, there has been a global call to embrace new forms of moral personhood that practice \"proper\" use, including prescription, dispensing and consumption of antimicrobials, especially antibiotics. This paper seeks to reflect on complex questions about how morality has become embedded /embodied in the AMR discourse as presented in the data collected on antimicrobial prescription, dispensing and use in human and livestock health in Tanzania, primarily focusing on antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This reflection is anchored on Jarrett Zigon's morality framework that is comprised of three dimensions of discourse; the institutional, public, and embodied dispositions. The data we use within this framework are derived from a qualitative study targeting human and animal health care service providers and community members in northern Tanzania. Data were collected through 28 in-depth interviews and ten focus group discussions and analysed through content analysis after translation and transcription. In addition, a review of the Tanzania's National Action Plans on antimicrobial resistance was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Application of the framework demonstrates points of convergence and divergence in the institutional morality discourse articulated by the Tanzania National Action Plans, the public discourse and the embodied dispositions/ lived experiences of human and animal health care service providers and community members. We demonstrate that AMR is not just associated with \"inappropriate\" behaviour on the part of drug prescribers, dispensers, and users but also with shortcomings in health systems and service delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic dispensing and use practices that may be associated with the development of AMR should not be viewed in isolation from the broader health context within which they occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book review: ethics of artificial intelligence. 书评:人工智能伦理。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00219-w
Mohammad Hosseini

The book Ethics of Artificial Intelligence offers a solid exploration of arguments and real-world examples that enrich the ongoing debate surrounding AI ethics. With 12 insightful chapters, the book delves into pressing ethical issues, such as the enhancement of human abilities, the nature of consciousness, and questions of responsibility and accountability in various contexts where AI technology is used. This work connects technology ethics with broader philosophical discussions and provides valuable perspectives on the societal implications of AI. Engaging and accessible, it can serve as an essential resource for scholars, technology-enthusiasts, policymakers, and anyone with an interest in the transformative potential of AI and its ethical dimensions.

人工智能伦理学》一书对各种论点和现实世界中的实例进行了扎实的探讨,丰富了当前围绕人工智能伦理学展开的讨论。该书通过 12 个富有洞察力的章节,深入探讨了紧迫的伦理问题,如人类能力的增强、意识的本质,以及在使用人工智能技术的各种情况下的责任和问责问题。这部著作将技术伦理学与更广泛的哲学讨论联系起来,为人工智能的社会影响提供了宝贵的视角。本书引人入胜、通俗易懂,是学者、技术爱好者、政策制定者以及任何对人工智能的变革潜力及其伦理层面感兴趣的人的重要资源。
{"title":"Book review: ethics of artificial intelligence.","authors":"Mohammad Hosseini","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00219-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00219-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The book Ethics of Artificial Intelligence offers a solid exploration of arguments and real-world examples that enrich the ongoing debate surrounding AI ethics. With 12 insightful chapters, the book delves into pressing ethical issues, such as the enhancement of human abilities, the nature of consciousness, and questions of responsibility and accountability in various contexts where AI technology is used. This work connects technology ethics with broader philosophical discussions and provides valuable perspectives on the societal implications of AI. Engaging and accessible, it can serve as an essential resource for scholars, technology-enthusiasts, policymakers, and anyone with an interest in the transformative potential of AI and its ethical dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coercive public health policies need context-specific ethical justifications. 强制性公共卫生政策需要根据具体情况进行伦理论证。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00218-x
Tess Johnson, Lerato Ndlovu, Omolara O Baiyegunhi, Wezzie S Lora, Nicola Desmond

Public health policies designed to improve individual and population health may involve coercion. These coercive policies require ethical justification, and yet it is unclear in the public health ethics literature which ethical concepts might justify coercion, and what their limitations are in applying across contexts. In this paper, we analyse a number of concepts from Western bioethics, including the harm principle, paternalism, the public interest, and a duty of easy rescue. We find them plausible justifications for coercion in theory, but when applied to case studies, including HIV testing in Malawi, vaccine mandates in South Africa, and prohibitions of antibiotic use in livestock in the EU, their limitations become clear. We argue that the context-specificity of ethical justifications for coercion has been overlooked, and there is more work needed to identify context-relevant ethical justifications for coercive policies in various settings and for various populations, rather than relying on universalising Western bioethical justifications across all contexts.

旨在改善个人和群体健康的公共卫生政策可能涉及强制。这些强制政策需要伦理上的正当理由,然而,在公共卫生伦理学文献中,哪些伦理概念可以为强制提供正当理由,以及这些概念在不同情况下的适用局限性如何,都还不清楚。在本文中,我们分析了西方生命伦理学中的一些概念,包括伤害原则、家长作风、公共利益和易救责任。我们发现,从理论上讲,这些概念为强制行为提供了合理的理由,但在应用于案例研究时,包括马拉维的艾滋病检测、南非的疫苗规定以及欧盟对牲畜使用抗生素的禁令,这些概念的局限性就显而易见了。我们认为,人们忽视了强制性伦理理由的具体情况,因此需要做更多的工作,为不同环境和不同人群的强制性政策找出与具体情况相关的伦理理由,而不是依赖于在所有情况下都通用的西方生物伦理理由。
{"title":"Coercive public health policies need context-specific ethical justifications.","authors":"Tess Johnson, Lerato Ndlovu, Omolara O Baiyegunhi, Wezzie S Lora, Nicola Desmond","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00218-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00218-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health policies designed to improve individual and population health may involve coercion. These coercive policies require ethical justification, and yet it is unclear in the public health ethics literature which ethical concepts might justify coercion, and what their limitations are in applying across contexts. In this paper, we analyse a number of concepts from Western bioethics, including the harm principle, paternalism, the public interest, and a duty of easy rescue. We find them plausible justifications for coercion in theory, but when applied to case studies, including HIV testing in Malawi, vaccine mandates in South Africa, and prohibitions of antibiotic use in livestock in the EU, their limitations become clear. We argue that the context-specificity of ethical justifications for coercion has been overlooked, and there is more work needed to identify context-relevant ethical justifications for coercive policies in various settings and for various populations, rather than relying on universalising Western bioethical justifications across all contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public health, pluralism, and the telos of political virtue. 公共卫生、多元化和政治美德的目的。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00216-z
Kathryn L MacKay

In the ethics of public health, questions of virtue, that is, of what it means for public health to act excellently, have received little attention. This omission needs remedy first because achieving improvements in population-wide health can be in tension with goals like respect for the liberty, self-determination, or non-oppression of various individuals or groups. A virtue-ethics approach is flexible and well-suited for the kind of deliberation required to resolve or mitigate such tension. Public health requires practically wise and careful thinking, which virtue ethics brings with it. Furthermore, too tight a focus on delivering outcomes in determining how public health should act has, in some cases, actually undermined its ability to achieve those consequences. However, the main concern about incorporating virtue into public health in a pluralistic society is likely to be that virtue is generally teleological, and we would surely need some widely agreed upon idea of something like flourishing or the common good for this to work. In this paper, I propose that for public health to express virtue in its work, it must express a commitment to justice as it goes about its business promoting and protecting the health of the population. Justice is both a contributor toward better health for groups in society, and a worthwhile goal in its own right. I will sketch an argument that justice as non-oppression - not merely health equity - is the right telos toward which excellent public health should aim in a pluralist society.

在公共卫生伦理学中,有关美德的问题,即公共卫生的卓越行为意味着什么,很少受到关注。这种疏忽首先需要补救,因为实现全民健康的改善可能与尊重个人或群体的自由、自决或不受压迫等目标相冲突。美德伦理方法是灵活的,非常适合解决或缓解这种矛盾所需的审议。公共卫生需要实际的智慧和缜密的思维,而美德伦理正是这种智慧和思维的体现。此外,在决定公共卫生应如何行动时,过于注重结果,在某些情况下实际上会削弱其实现这些结果的能力。然而,在多元社会中将美德纳入公共卫生的主要问题可能是,美德一般都是目的论的,我们肯定需要一些广泛认同的理念,比如繁荣或共同利益,这样才能行之有效。在本文中,我建议公共卫生要在其工作中体现美德,就必须在促进和保护民众健康的过程中表达对正义的承诺。正义既有助于改善社会群体的健康状况,本身也是一个值得追求的目标。我将概述一个论点,即作为非压迫的公正--而不仅仅是健康公平--是一个多元化社会中优秀的公共卫生所应追求的正确目标。
{"title":"Public health, pluralism, and the telos of political virtue.","authors":"Kathryn L MacKay","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00216-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00216-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the ethics of public health, questions of virtue, that is, of what it means for public health to act excellently, have received little attention. This omission needs remedy first because achieving improvements in population-wide health can be in tension with goals like respect for the liberty, self-determination, or non-oppression of various individuals or groups. A virtue-ethics approach is flexible and well-suited for the kind of deliberation required to resolve or mitigate such tension. Public health requires practically wise and careful thinking, which virtue ethics brings with it. Furthermore, too tight a focus on delivering outcomes in determining how public health should act has, in some cases, actually undermined its ability to achieve those consequences. However, the main concern about incorporating virtue into public health in a pluralistic society is likely to be that virtue is generally teleological, and we would surely need some widely agreed upon idea of something like flourishing or the common good for this to work. In this paper, I propose that for public health to express virtue in its work, it must express a commitment to justice as it goes about its business promoting and protecting the health of the population. Justice is both a contributor toward better health for groups in society, and a worthwhile goal in its own right. I will sketch an argument that justice as non-oppression - not merely health equity - is the right telos toward which excellent public health should aim in a pluralist society.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142368196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smoking & autonomy: the generational tobacco endgame. 吸烟与自主:一代人的烟草终局。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00207-0
Shazeea Mohamed Ali

New Zealand and Malaysia have abandoned plans to introduce a generational smoking ban because of concerns that such a policy is incompatible with liberal democracy as it undermines autonomy. This paper challenges this claim by showing that smoking is not an autonomous act. Autonomy requires a deliberation of preferences, wills and inclinations. This does not occur in smokers because of three related factors: nicotine addiction, cognitive biases and psychosocial development in addiction. Nicotine addiction results in strong physical and psychological desires to seek pleasure and to avoid withdrawal. This is further potentiated by conditioned behaviour. Cognitive biases explain why smokers act in ways that are detrimental to their health. Psychosocial development explains how the brains of smokers are unable to make rational decisions. This combination renders smokers unable to reflect on their actions and thus act autonomously. This stance is compatible with Mill's view that actions that devalue autonomy cannot be considered autonomous. Defenders of liberalism should not be quick to dismiss a smoking ban and can instead foster autonomy by supporting it.

新西兰和马来西亚放弃了实行代际禁烟的计划,因为人们担心这种政策会破坏自主性,与自由民主不相容。本文通过说明吸烟并非自主行为,对这一说法提出质疑。自主需要对偏好、意愿和倾向进行深思熟虑。吸烟者之所以不能自主,是因为三个相关因素:尼古丁成瘾、认知偏差和成瘾的社会心理发展。尼古丁上瘾会产生强烈的生理和心理欲望,以寻求快感和避免戒断。条件反射行为进一步加剧了这种欲望。认知偏差解释了为什么吸烟者的行为会损害他们的健康。社会心理发展解释了吸烟者的大脑如何无法做出理性决定。这种组合使吸烟者无法反思自己的行为,从而无法自主行事。这一立场与密尔的观点是一致的,即贬低自主性的行为不能被视为自主行为。自由主义的捍卫者不应急于否定禁烟令,而是可以通过支持禁烟令来促进自主性。
{"title":"Smoking & autonomy: the generational tobacco endgame.","authors":"Shazeea Mohamed Ali","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00207-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00207-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New Zealand and Malaysia have abandoned plans to introduce a generational smoking ban because of concerns that such a policy is incompatible with liberal democracy as it undermines autonomy. This paper challenges this claim by showing that smoking is not an autonomous act. Autonomy requires a deliberation of preferences, wills and inclinations. This does not occur in smokers because of three related factors: nicotine addiction, cognitive biases and psychosocial development in addiction. Nicotine addiction results in strong physical and psychological desires to seek pleasure and to avoid withdrawal. This is further potentiated by conditioned behaviour. Cognitive biases explain why smokers act in ways that are detrimental to their health. Psychosocial development explains how the brains of smokers are unable to make rational decisions. This combination renders smokers unable to reflect on their actions and thus act autonomously. This stance is compatible with Mill's view that actions that devalue autonomy cannot be considered autonomous. Defenders of liberalism should not be quick to dismiss a smoking ban and can instead foster autonomy by supporting it.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142366872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treating Mycoplasma genitalium (in pregnancy): a social and reproductive justice concern. 治疗(孕期)生殖器支原体:社会和生殖正义问题。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00200-7
Ulla McKnight, Bobbie Farsides, Suneeta Soni, Catherine Will

Antimicrobial Resistance is a threat to individual and to population health and to future generations, requiring "collective sacrifices" in order to preserve antibiotic efficacy. 'Who should make the sacrifices?' and 'Who will most likely make them?' are ethical concerns posited as potentially manageable through Antimicrobial Stewardship. Antimicrobial stewardship almost inevitably involves a form of clinical cost-benefit analysis that assesses the possible effects of antibiotics to treat a diagnosed infection in a particular patient. However, this process rarely accounts properly for patients - above and beyond assessments of potential (non)compliance or adherence to care regimes. Drawing on a vignette of a pregnant woman of colour and migrant diagnosed with Mycoplasma genitalium, a sexually transmissible bacterium, this article draws out some of the ethical, speculative, and practical tensions and complexities involved in Antimicrobial Stewardship. We argue that patients also engage in a form of cost-benefit analysis influenced by experiences of reproductive and social (in)justice and comprising speculative variables - to anticipate future possibilities. These processes have the potential to have effects above and beyond the specific infection antimicrobial stewardship was activated to address. We contend that efforts to practice and research antimicrobial stewardship should accommodate and incorporate these variables and acknowledge the structures they emerge with(in), even if their components remain unknown. This would involve recognising that antimicrobial stewardship is intricately connected to other social justice issues such as immigration policy, economic justice, access to appropriate medical care, racism, etc.

抗菌药耐药性是对个人和群体健康以及子孙后代的威胁,需要 "集体牺牲 "以保持抗生素的疗效。谁应该做出牺牲?"和 "谁最有可能做出牺牲?"是抗菌药物管理可能解决的伦理问题。抗菌药物管理几乎不可避免地涉及一种临床成本效益分析,即评估抗生素治疗特定患者确诊感染的可能效果。然而,除了对潜在的(不)依从性或对护理方案的依从性进行评估之外,这一过程很少对患者进行适当的考虑。本文以一位被诊断患有生殖支原体(一种性传播细菌)的有色人种和移民孕妇为例,引出了抗菌药物管理所涉及的一些伦理、推测和实践方面的矛盾和复杂性。我们认为,受生殖和社会(不)公正经验的影响,患者也会进行某种形式的成本效益分析,其中包括推测变量--预测未来的可能性。这些过程有可能产生超出抗菌药物管理所针对的特定感染的影响。我们认为,抗菌药物管理的实践和研究工作应适应并纳入这些变量,并承认它们所产生的结构,即使其组成部分仍然未知。这就需要认识到抗菌药物管理与其他社会公正问题(如移民政策、经济公正、获得适当的医疗护理、种族主义等)有着错综复杂的联系。
{"title":"Treating Mycoplasma genitalium (in pregnancy): a social and reproductive justice concern.","authors":"Ulla McKnight, Bobbie Farsides, Suneeta Soni, Catherine Will","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00200-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00200-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial Resistance is a threat to individual and to population health and to future generations, requiring \"collective sacrifices\" in order to preserve antibiotic efficacy. 'Who should make the sacrifices?' and 'Who will most likely make them?' are ethical concerns posited as potentially manageable through Antimicrobial Stewardship. Antimicrobial stewardship almost inevitably involves a form of clinical cost-benefit analysis that assesses the possible effects of antibiotics to treat a diagnosed infection in a particular patient. However, this process rarely accounts properly for patients - above and beyond assessments of potential (non)compliance or adherence to care regimes. Drawing on a vignette of a pregnant woman of colour and migrant diagnosed with Mycoplasma genitalium, a sexually transmissible bacterium, this article draws out some of the ethical, speculative, and practical tensions and complexities involved in Antimicrobial Stewardship. We argue that patients also engage in a form of cost-benefit analysis influenced by experiences of reproductive and social (in)justice and comprising speculative variables - to anticipate future possibilities. These processes have the potential to have effects above and beyond the specific infection antimicrobial stewardship was activated to address. We contend that efforts to practice and research antimicrobial stewardship should accommodate and incorporate these variables and acknowledge the structures they emerge with(in), even if their components remain unknown. This would involve recognising that antimicrobial stewardship is intricately connected to other social justice issues such as immigration policy, economic justice, access to appropriate medical care, racism, etc.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From super-wicked problems to more-than-human justice: new bioethical frameworks for antimicrobial resistance and climate emergency. 从超级恶性问题到超越人类的正义:抗菌药耐药性和气候紧急情况的新生物伦理框架。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00197-z
Tiia Sudenkaarne, Andrea Butcher

In this article, building on our multidisciplinary expertise on philosophy, anthropology, and social study of microbes, we discuss and analyze new approaches to justice that have emerged in thinking with more-than-human contexts: microbes, animals, environments and ecosystems. We situate our analysis in theory of and practical engagements with antimicrobial resistance and climate emergency that both can be considered super-wicked problems. In offering solutions to such problems, we discuss a more-than-human justice orientation, seeking to displace human exceptionalism while still engaging with human social justice issues. We offer anthropological narratives to highlight how more-than-human actors already play an important role in environmental and climate politics. These narratives further justify the need for new ethical frameworks, out of which we, for further development outside the scope of this article, suggest a queer feminist posthumanist one.

在本文中,我们以哲学、人类学和微生物社会研究等多学科专业知识为基础,讨论并分析了在思考微生物、动物、环境和生态系统等非人类环境时出现的新的正义方法。我们的分析立足于抗菌药耐药性和气候紧急状况的理论和实践,这两个问题都可以被视为超级病态问题。在为这些问题提供解决方案的过程中,我们讨论了一种超越人类正义的取向,在寻求取代人类例外论的同时,仍然关注人类的社会正义问题。我们提供了人类学叙事,强调超人类行动者如何在环境和气候政治中发挥重要作用。这些叙事进一步证明了需要新的伦理框架,在此基础上,我们提出了一个同性恋女权主义者的后人类主义框架,但这一框架的进一步发展不在本文讨论范围之内。
{"title":"From super-wicked problems to more-than-human justice: new bioethical frameworks for antimicrobial resistance and climate emergency.","authors":"Tiia Sudenkaarne, Andrea Butcher","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00197-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00197-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, building on our multidisciplinary expertise on philosophy, anthropology, and social study of microbes, we discuss and analyze new approaches to justice that have emerged in thinking with more-than-human contexts: microbes, animals, environments and ecosystems. We situate our analysis in theory of and practical engagements with antimicrobial resistance and climate emergency that both can be considered super-wicked problems. In offering solutions to such problems, we discuss a more-than-human justice orientation, seeking to displace human exceptionalism while still engaging with human social justice issues. We offer anthropological narratives to highlight how more-than-human actors already play an important role in environmental and climate politics. These narratives further justify the need for new ethical frameworks, out of which we, for further development outside the scope of this article, suggest a queer feminist posthumanist one.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distributive justice and value trade-offs in antibiotic use in aged care settings. 老年护理机构抗生素使用中的分配公正和价值权衡。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00191-5
Jane Williams, Sittichoke Chawraingern, Chris Degeling

Residential aged care facilities (RACF) are sites of high antibiotic use in Australia. Misuse of antimicrobial drugs in RACF contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) burdens that accrue to individuals and the wider public, now and in the future. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices in RACF, e.g. requiring conformation of infection, are designed to minimise inappropriate use of antibiotics. We conducted dialogue groups with 46 participants with a parent receiving aged care to better understand families' perspectives on antibiotics and care in RACF. Participants grappled with value trade offs in thinking about their own parents' care, juggling imagined population and future harms with known short term comfort of individuals and prioritising the latter. Distributive justice in AMR relies on collective moral responsibility and action for the benefit of future generations and unknown others. In RACF, AMS requires value trade-offs and compromise on antimicrobial use in an environment that is heavily reliant on antimicrobial drugs to perform caring functions. In the context of aged care, AMS is a technical solution to a deeply relational and socio-structural problem and there is a risk that carers (workers, families) are morally burdened by system failures that are not addressed in AMS solutions.

养老院(RACF)是澳大利亚抗生素使用率较高的场所。在养老院中滥用抗菌药物会导致抗菌药物耐药性(AMR),给个人和广大公众带来现在和未来的负担。RACF 中的抗菌药物管理(AMS)措施(如要求提供感染信息)旨在最大限度地减少抗生素的不当使用。我们与 46 位父母正在接受老年护理的参与者进行了对话,以更好地了解家庭对抗生素和护理中心护理的看法。参与者在考虑自己父母的护理问题时努力进行价值权衡,在想象的人口和未来危害与已知的个人短期舒适度之间进行权衡,并优先考虑后者。AMR 中的分配正义依赖于集体的道德责任和行动,以造福子孙后代和未知的其他人。在康复和护理设施中,在严重依赖抗菌药物来履行护理功能的环境中,抗菌药物管理需要在抗菌药物的使用上进行价值权衡和妥协。在老年护理方面,抗菌药物管理系统是对一个深层关系和社会结构问题的技术解决方案,护理人员(工作人员、家庭)有可能因抗菌药物管理系统解决方案未解决的系统故障而背上道德负担。
{"title":"Distributive justice and value trade-offs in antibiotic use in aged care settings.","authors":"Jane Williams, Sittichoke Chawraingern, Chris Degeling","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00191-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00191-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Residential aged care facilities (RACF) are sites of high antibiotic use in Australia. Misuse of antimicrobial drugs in RACF contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) burdens that accrue to individuals and the wider public, now and in the future. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices in RACF, e.g. requiring conformation of infection, are designed to minimise inappropriate use of antibiotics. We conducted dialogue groups with 46 participants with a parent receiving aged care to better understand families' perspectives on antibiotics and care in RACF. Participants grappled with value trade offs in thinking about their own parents' care, juggling imagined population and future harms with known short term comfort of individuals and prioritising the latter. Distributive justice in AMR relies on collective moral responsibility and action for the benefit of future generations and unknown others. In RACF, AMS requires value trade-offs and compromise on antimicrobial use in an environment that is heavily reliant on antimicrobial drugs to perform caring functions. In the context of aged care, AMS is a technical solution to a deeply relational and socio-structural problem and there is a risk that carers (workers, families) are morally burdened by system failures that are not addressed in AMS solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Where do families turn? Ethical dilemmas in the care of chronically critically Ill children. 家庭该何去何从?慢性重症儿童护理中的伦理困境。
IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00201-6
Johnson Pang, Lora Batson, Kathryn Detwiler, Mattea E Miller, Dörte Thorndike, Renee D Boss, Miriam C Shapiro

Advancements in early diagnosis and novel treatments for children with complex and chronic needs have improved their chances of survival. But many survive with complex medical needs and ongoing medical management in the setting of prognostic uncertainty. Their medical care relies more and more on preference-sensitive decisions, requiring medical team and family engagement in ethically challenging situations. Many families are unprepared as they face these ethical challenges and struggle to access relevant ethical resources. In this paper, Timmy's narrative, situated in the context of what is known about ethical challenges in the care of children with chronic critical illness (CCI), serves as a case study of the gap in available ethical resources to guide families in their approach to difficult decision making for children with significant medical complexity and CCI. Our author group, inclusive of parents of children with complex medical needs and medical professionals, identifies domains of ethical challenges facing families of children with CCI and we highlight the development of family/caregiver-oriented ethics resources as an essential expansion of pediatric bioethics.

针对有复杂和慢性需求的儿童的早期诊断和新型治疗方法的进步提高了他们的生存机会。但是,许多患儿在预后不确定的情况下,带着复杂的医疗需求和持续的医疗管理存活下来。他们的医疗护理越来越依赖于对偏好敏感的决定,这就要求医疗团队和家庭参与到具有伦理挑战性的情况中。许多家庭在面对这些伦理挑战时毫无准备,并且难以获得相关的伦理资源。在本文中,Timmy 的叙述以人们对慢性危重症(CCI)患儿护理过程中的伦理挑战的了解为背景,作为一个案例研究,说明在可用的伦理资源方面存在的差距,以指导家庭如何为患有严重医疗复杂性和慢性危重症的患儿做出艰难的决策。我们的作者群包括有复杂医疗需求儿童的家长和医疗专业人士,他们确定了 CCI 儿童家庭面临的伦理挑战领域,我们强调开发以家庭/护理人员为导向的伦理资源是儿科生命伦理学的重要扩展。
{"title":"Where do families turn? Ethical dilemmas in the care of chronically critically Ill children.","authors":"Johnson Pang, Lora Batson, Kathryn Detwiler, Mattea E Miller, Dörte Thorndike, Renee D Boss, Miriam C Shapiro","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00201-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00201-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancements in early diagnosis and novel treatments for children with complex and chronic needs have improved their chances of survival. But many survive with complex medical needs and ongoing medical management in the setting of prognostic uncertainty. Their medical care relies more and more on preference-sensitive decisions, requiring medical team and family engagement in ethically challenging situations. Many families are unprepared as they face these ethical challenges and struggle to access relevant ethical resources. In this paper, Timmy's narrative, situated in the context of what is known about ethical challenges in the care of children with chronic critical illness (CCI), serves as a case study of the gap in available ethical resources to guide families in their approach to difficult decision making for children with significant medical complexity and CCI. Our author group, inclusive of parents of children with complex medical needs and medical professionals, identifies domains of ethical challenges facing families of children with CCI and we highlight the development of family/caregiver-oriented ethics resources as an essential expansion of pediatric bioethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141555654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Monash Bioethics Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1