Pub Date : 2022-09-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835885654
O. Müller
{"title":"Replik zu den Kommentaren","authors":"O. Müller","doi":"10.3196/004433022835885654","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835885654","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45687041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835407113
Rogelio Rovira
In a 1793 essay, J. Ch. Schwab claimed that Kant's distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments was already known to the Megarian philosopher Stilpo. Schwab's essay was criticised as early as 1794 by J. F. Ch. Gräffe. In a 1789 essay, J. A. Eberhard had also denied the originality of Kant's division of judgments and made certain indications suggesting that Aristotle was aware of the distinction. In this paper, I propose a fresh examination of why Schwab is wrong to attribute knowledge of Kant's division of judgments to Stilpo – a second look which, however, does not disregard Gräffe's contributions to the discussion. Second, I argue that, in a precise sense, Kant's division of judgments is indeed original, but that the analytic – synthetic distinction was nevertheless in a sense known to Aristotle. The assessment of these alleged precedents sheds light no only on the novelty of Kant's philosophical project but also on what may be called the "the paradox of the discovery of an evident philosophical distinction".
{"title":"Did the Ancient Greeks Know the Difference Between Analytic and Synthetic Judgments? Discussion of a Question Posed in The Aetas Kantiana","authors":"Rogelio Rovira","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407113","url":null,"abstract":"In a 1793 essay, J. Ch. Schwab claimed that Kant's distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments was already known to the Megarian philosopher Stilpo. Schwab's essay was criticised as early as 1794 by J. F. Ch. Gräffe. In a 1789 essay, J. A. Eberhard had also denied the\u0000 originality of Kant's division of judgments and made certain indications suggesting that Aristotle was aware of the distinction. In this paper, I propose a fresh examination of why Schwab is wrong to attribute knowledge of Kant's division of judgments to Stilpo – a second look which,\u0000 however, does not disregard Gräffe's contributions to the discussion. Second, I argue that, in a precise sense, Kant's division of judgments is indeed original, but that the analytic – synthetic distinction was nevertheless in a sense known to Aristotle. The assessment of these\u0000 alleged precedents sheds light no only on the novelty of Kant's philosophical project but also on what may be called the \"the paradox of the discovery of an evident philosophical distinction\".","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45777354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835407168
Stefan Rinner
A central method of systemic therapy is the use of so called systemic questions. With these questions the therapist provides the client with an alternative and possibly less problematic description of reality. Since clients tend to tacitly accept these implicit offers by the therapist, systemic questions are often ascribed a "hypnotic" effect. In this paper, I will explain the "hypnotic" effect of systemic questions with the linguistic phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. For instance, in "Scorekeeping in a Language Game", David Lewis points out that speakers tend to tacitly accept the presuppositions of an utterance, because an utterance is only appropriate if its presuppositions are already part of common ground. Starting from this, I will argue with von Fintel's 'Hey, wait a minute' test that the implicit offers of systemic questions are nothing more than presuppositions of these questions. First, this will provide an explanation of the "hypnotic" effect of systemic question via the phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. In addition, it will explain how the implicit offers of systemic questions enable a new description of reality on the part of the client. In this way, the present paper is an example of how philosophy of language can be applied to problems outside of philosophy, providing further evidence that the research area of applied philosophy of language is real.
{"title":"Wirken Durch Anpassung: Eine Sprachphilosophische Erklärung Der Wirksamkeit Systemischer Fragen","authors":"Stefan Rinner","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407168","url":null,"abstract":"A central method of systemic therapy is the use of so called systemic questions. With these questions the therapist provides the client with an alternative and possibly less problematic description of reality. Since clients tend to tacitly accept these implicit offers by the therapist,\u0000 systemic questions are often ascribed a \"hypnotic\" effect. In this paper, I will explain the \"hypnotic\" effect of systemic questions with the linguistic phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. For instance, in \"Scorekeeping in a Language Game\", David Lewis points out that speakers tend\u0000 to tacitly accept the presuppositions of an utterance, because an utterance is only appropriate if its presuppositions are already part of common ground. Starting from this, I will argue with von Fintel's 'Hey, wait a minute' test that the implicit offers of systemic questions are nothing\u0000 more than presuppositions of these questions. First, this will provide an explanation of the \"hypnotic\" effect of systemic question via the phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. In addition, it will explain how the implicit offers of systemic questions enable a new description of reality\u0000 on the part of the client. In this way, the present paper is an example of how philosophy of language can be applied to problems outside of philosophy, providing further evidence that the research area of applied philosophy of language is real.","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46043227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835407177
Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer
{"title":"Von Der Logik Des Wahrnehmens Zur Vollen Geistigen Person Kommentar Zu: Die Aktivität Der Wahrnehmung Und Die Metaphysik Des Geistes","authors":"Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407177","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48079100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835407186
D. Emundts
Das Buch Die Aktivität der Wahrnehmung und die Metaphysik des Geistes ist ein wirklich gelungenes Buch. Es stellt eine ernsthafte und ergiebige Auseinandersetzung mit Hegels Texten (unter anderem Phänomenologie und Enzyklopädie ) dar und schafft es gleichzeitig, interessante und originelle Thesen überzeugend zu präsentieren. Von den Thesen, die Thomas Oehl vertritt, sind in meinen Augen zwei sowohl zentral als auch besonders strittig: die zur Aktivität der Wahrnehmung und die zu Gott als Geist beziehungsweise zu Hegels Philosophie der Religion. Mit diesen beiden Thesen werde ich mich im Folgenden auseinandersetzen.
{"title":"Differenzen Bei Den Thesen Zur Rolle Der Begriffe Und Zur Transformation Religiöser Inhalte: Kommentar Zu Die Aktivität Der Wahrnehmung Und Die Metaphysik Des Geistes.","authors":"D. Emundts","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407186","url":null,"abstract":"Das Buch Die Aktivität der Wahrnehmung und die Metaphysik des Geistes ist ein wirklich gelungenes Buch. Es stellt eine ernsthafte und ergiebige Auseinandersetzung mit Hegels Texten (unter anderem Phänomenologie und Enzyklopädie ) dar und schafft es\u0000 gleichzeitig, interessante und originelle Thesen überzeugend zu präsentieren. Von den Thesen, die Thomas Oehl vertritt, sind in meinen Augen zwei sowohl zentral als auch besonders strittig: die zur Aktivität der Wahrnehmung und die zu Gott als Geist beziehungsweise zu Hegels\u0000 Philosophie der Religion. Mit diesen beiden Thesen werde ich mich im Folgenden auseinandersetzen.","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47048609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835407122
Thomas Oehl
{"title":"Précis Zu: Die Aktivität Der Wahrnehmung Und Die Metaphysik Des Geistes. Eine Aktualisierende Lektüre Von Hegels Philosophie Des Geistes","authors":"Thomas Oehl","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407122","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47103643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835407203
{"title":"Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung Herausgegeben Von Gerhard Ernst Und Christof Rapp","authors":"","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407203","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69806307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.3196/004433022835407140
Steffi Schadow
Hume's concept of justice as an artificial virtue is still controversial. In contrast to the more traditional research debate, the text defends a new reading of Hume's peculiar conception of justice, which understands his argument for justice as a special form of an internalism of practical reasons. It shows that his motivational justification for the virtue of justice proves to be consistent within his affect theory and yet systematically vulnerable.
{"title":"Ist Die Gerechtigkeit Nur Eine Fiktion? Hume über Das Konzept Einer ,künstlichen Tugend'","authors":"Steffi Schadow","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407140","url":null,"abstract":"Hume's concept of justice as an artificial virtue is still controversial. In contrast to the more traditional research debate, the text defends a new reading of Hume's peculiar conception of justice, which understands his argument for justice as a special form of an internalism of practical\u0000 reasons. It shows that his motivational justification for the virtue of justice proves to be consistent within his affect theory and yet systematically vulnerable.","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45289675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：