The article explores evidence of public policy ignoring scholarly recommendations, and describes instances of this in the field of language policy at both supranational and national levels. One significant contemporary influence is that university autonomy and academic freedom are being constrained by neoliberal pressures. Evidence of this in the United Kingdom and Denmark is described. These trends are connected to the wider context of the transition from the practices and ideology of terra nullius to legitimate colonisation and global Europeanisation, and the concomitant dispossession of the territories of others, to global Americanisation processes, the universalization of a cultura nullius in commerce, the media, academia, and domestic life. This dovetails with the promotion and establishment of English as a lingua nullius, a language that should be learned by all worldwide, as if it serves the interests of all inhabitants of the globe, and is disconnected from the causal factors behind the expansion of the language. One speech by Winston Churchill argues for the maintenance of university autonomy and historical awareness. Another pleads for Anglo-American global dominance, including the promotion of English as a ‘world’ language. These competing pleas have had different outcomes: academic freedom and traditions are currently at risk, whereas US dominance and the promotion and expansion of English have thrived. The governments of the five Nordic countries have acted to ensure the maintenance of national languages as well as competence in ‘international languages’. This is exemplified by a description of how universities should assure parallel competence and thereby a healthy balance between English and national languages. Soft power is never far from economic, political, and military power, all of which entail language use. China and Chinese are well launched on a comparable trajectory to the expansion of English.
{"title":"Languages in public policy, and constraints in academia","authors":"R. Phillipson","doi":"10.1075/lplp.00046.phi","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00046.phi","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The article explores evidence of public policy ignoring scholarly recommendations, and describes instances of this\u0000 in the field of language policy at both supranational and national levels. One significant contemporary influence is that\u0000 university autonomy and academic freedom are being constrained by neoliberal pressures. Evidence of this in the United Kingdom and\u0000 Denmark is described. These trends are connected to the wider context of the transition from the practices and ideology of\u0000 terra nullius to legitimate colonisation and global Europeanisation, and the concomitant dispossession of the\u0000 territories of others, to global Americanisation processes, the universalization of a cultura nullius in\u0000 commerce, the media, academia, and domestic life. This dovetails with the promotion and establishment of English as a\u0000 lingua nullius, a language that should be learned by all worldwide, as if it serves the interests of all\u0000 inhabitants of the globe, and is disconnected from the causal factors behind the expansion of the language. One speech by Winston\u0000 Churchill argues for the maintenance of university autonomy and historical awareness. Another pleads for Anglo-American global\u0000 dominance, including the promotion of English as a ‘world’ language. These competing pleas have had different outcomes: academic\u0000 freedom and traditions are currently at risk, whereas US dominance and the promotion and expansion of English have thrived. The\u0000 governments of the five Nordic countries have acted to ensure the maintenance of national languages as well as competence in\u0000 ‘international languages’. This is exemplified by a description of how universities should assure parallel competence and thereby\u0000 a healthy balance between English and national languages. Soft power is never far from economic, political, and military power,\u0000 all of which entail language use. China and Chinese are well launched on a comparable trajectory to the expansion of English.","PeriodicalId":44345,"journal":{"name":"Language Problems & Language Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45209575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This study focuses on Macao, a former Portuguese colony and a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China after 1999. A questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2012 and 2013 respectively among freshmen of the University of Macau to investigate their attitudes to issues in Macao’s language policy and planning (LPP). Findings of this study reflect their practical attitudes, as reflected in their attitudes towards the choice of English or Portuguese as the first foreign language in Macao public schools. At the same time, their attitudes also reflect their strong local allegiances and resistance to Mainland China’s cultural practices, as reflected in their views on the issue of the official status of Putonghua in the Macao SAR, the choice of Putonghua or Cantonese as the medium of instruction, and the maintenance of traditional Chinese characters, written Cantonese, and Cantonese Romanization System in Macao.
{"title":"A study of Macao tertiary students’ attitudes to issues in postcolonial Macao’s language policy and\u0000 planning","authors":"Xi Yan","doi":"10.1075/lplp.00033.yan","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00033.yan","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study focuses on Macao, a former Portuguese colony and a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China after 1999. A questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2012 and 2013 respectively among freshmen of the University of Macau to investigate their attitudes to issues in Macao’s language policy and planning (LPP). Findings of this study reflect their practical attitudes, as reflected in their attitudes towards the choice of English or Portuguese as the first foreign language in Macao public schools. At the same time, their attitudes also reflect their strong local allegiances and resistance to Mainland China’s cultural practices, as reflected in their views on the issue of the official status of Putonghua in the Macao SAR, the choice of Putonghua or Cantonese as the medium of instruction, and the maintenance of traditional Chinese characters, written Cantonese, and Cantonese Romanization System in Macao.","PeriodicalId":44345,"journal":{"name":"Language Problems & Language Planning","volume":"43 1","pages":"241-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41557914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}