Pub Date : 2023-10-04DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3319592
Shweta S Pal;Frank H C van Loenhout;Jelle Westerhof;Rebecca Saive
Bifacial modules combined with optimally positioned ground reflectors (albedo) can boost photovoltaic (PV) yield. Yet, a rigorous understanding and benchmarking of the reflector performance is missing, which leads to errors in power yield and economic estimates, thus hampering PV market penetration. Here, we address this impediment by establishing an experimentally validated reverse ray tracing (RRT) approach, combined with empirically derived parameters. First, we determine the spectro-angular reflection of a wide class of ground reflectors (diffuse, glossy, and specular). These parameters were fed into our RRT software, that simulated the PV yield, which was then experimentally validated with a model PV system. The validated framework enables determining an upper limit to PV yield enhancement and current mismatch within modules exposed to different kinds of reflectors. Our approach helps assessing already-existing natural and exotic reflectors, and inspire novel reflectors for enhanced PV yield and economic benefits.
{"title":"Understanding and Benchmarking Ground Reflectors for Bifacial Photovoltaic Yield Enhancement","authors":"Shweta S Pal;Frank H C van Loenhout;Jelle Westerhof;Rebecca Saive","doi":"10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3319592","DOIUrl":"10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3319592","url":null,"abstract":"Bifacial modules combined with optimally positioned ground reflectors (albedo) can boost photovoltaic (PV) yield. Yet, a rigorous understanding and benchmarking of the reflector performance is missing, which leads to errors in power yield and economic estimates, thus hampering PV market penetration. Here, we address this impediment by establishing an experimentally validated reverse ray tracing (RRT) approach, combined with empirically derived parameters. First, we determine the spectro-angular reflection of a wide class of ground reflectors (diffuse, glossy, and specular). These parameters were fed into our RRT software, that simulated the PV yield, which was then experimentally validated with a model PV system. The validated framework enables determining an upper limit to PV yield enhancement and current mismatch within modules exposed to different kinds of reflectors. Our approach helps assessing already-existing natural and exotic reflectors, and inspire novel reflectors for enhanced PV yield and economic benefits.","PeriodicalId":445,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics","volume":"14 1","pages":"160-169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10272316","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135954718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The absence of practical models for estimating the impact of air pollution on solar output presents a challenge for forecasting of solar electricity production and creates more uncertainty for financing and insuring solar plants. While the physics of irradiance attenuation due to aerosols are well understood, complex atmospheric conditions and lack of detailed atmospheric measurement make them impractical for industry or small-scale solar users to calculate its impact on PV power generation. Simple, empirical models to quantify the overall effect from real-world observations are scarce. In this study, we make use of both the experimental approach as well as large-scale real-world observational data from more than 15 sites to empirically evaluate the impact of air pollution on PV production using only common weather parameters. We show that the impact of PM2.5 on irradiance and, hence, PV output is approximately linear at low and moderate levels of PM2.5, with a 100 μg/m 3