首页 > 最新文献

Journal for Specialists in Group Work最新文献

英文 中文
Looking Ahead to Continued Innovation 展望未来,持续创新
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2161769
Brittany L. Pollard-Kosidowski, Lorraine J. Guth
As evidenced by the articles included in this special issue, group workers have been both intentional and adaptive in navigating the global transformations that have characterized this historical era. Alongside the ongoing developmental needs of students and clients, the complex challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic and the sociopolitical unrest of the past few years have necessitated new levels of group work innovation. This special issue represents the wide array of topics with which group workers and scholars are currently engaged. As the world continues to transform in both unprecedented and expected ways, it will be important for group facilitators to remain adaptive, committed, and innovative in both theory and practice. We hope these articles provide new insight and direction for group work scholars and practitioners and we look forward to the continued evolution of this important work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
正如本期特刊所载的文章所证明的那样,在这个历史时代特征的全球变革中,群体工作者既有意识又适应。除了学生和客户的持续发展需求外,2019冠状病毒病大流行和过去几年的社会政治动荡带来的复杂挑战要求团队工作创新达到新的水平。这个特刊代表了广泛的主题阵列与组工人和学者目前从事。随着世界继续以前所未有的和预期的方式发生变化,对于小组促进者来说,在理论和实践中保持适应性,承诺和创新将是非常重要的。我们希望这些文章能为小组工作的学者和实践者提供新的见解和方向,我们期待着这项重要工作的继续发展。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)
{"title":"Looking Ahead to Continued Innovation","authors":"Brittany L. Pollard-Kosidowski, Lorraine J. Guth","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2161769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2161769","url":null,"abstract":"As evidenced by the articles included in this special issue, group workers have been both intentional and adaptive in navigating the global transformations that have characterized this historical era. Alongside the ongoing developmental needs of students and clients, the complex challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic and the sociopolitical unrest of the past few years have necessitated new levels of group work innovation. This special issue represents the wide array of topics with which group workers and scholars are currently engaged. As the world continues to transform in both unprecedented and expected ways, it will be important for group facilitators to remain adaptive, committed, and innovative in both theory and practice. We hope these articles provide new insight and direction for group work scholars and practitioners and we look forward to the continued evolution of this important work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76847120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction to Group Work Innovations in a Transforming World 变革世界中的团队工作创新导论
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2161767
Lorraine J. Guth, Brittany L. Pollard-Kosidowski
{"title":"Introduction to Group Work Innovations in a Transforming World","authors":"Lorraine J. Guth, Brittany L. Pollard-Kosidowski","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2161767","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2161767","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85580893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Phenomenological Study of Group Facilitators’ Experiences: A Mindfulness-based Wellbeing Group for International Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic 小组辅导员经验的现象学研究:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间国际学生正念福利小组
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2158971
Yiying Xiong, P. Prasath, Qiyang Zhang, L. Jeon, Y. Pillay
ABSTRACT This article presents the results of a phenomenological study that examined twelve counseling students’ experiences of facilitating an online mindfulness-based wellbeing group for international students (MBWIS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Three themes emerged, including the challenges of facilitating an online MBWIS, strategies and resources to cope with the challenges, and personal and professional growth of the facilitators. Implications for group work and counselor training are discussed.
本文介绍了一项现象学研究的结果,该研究调查了12名咨询学生在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间为国际学生建立在线正念健康小组(MBWIS)的经历。三个主题出现了,包括促进在线MBWIS的挑战,应对挑战的策略和资源,以及辅导员的个人和专业成长。讨论了小组工作和辅导员培训的意义。
{"title":"A Phenomenological Study of Group Facilitators’ Experiences: A Mindfulness-based Wellbeing Group for International Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Yiying Xiong, P. Prasath, Qiyang Zhang, L. Jeon, Y. Pillay","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2158971","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2158971","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents the results of a phenomenological study that examined twelve counseling students’ experiences of facilitating an online mindfulness-based wellbeing group for international students (MBWIS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Three themes emerged, including the challenges of facilitating an online MBWIS, strategies and resources to cope with the challenges, and personal and professional growth of the facilitators. Implications for group work and counselor training are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80603962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact: Will We Ever Have A Chance? 影响:我们还有机会吗?
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2129939
Kristopher M. Goodrich, David Van Horn
As noted by other scholars (i.e., Fernando & Minton, 2011; Hunter et al., 2018), journal-level impact (often referred to as impact factor) is a complex subject and has important meaning for different stakeholders. Journal level impact has been used by different colleges and universities to help inform how they evaluate faculty for formative and summative evaluation processes (Barrio Minton & Fernando, 2011), which can have a tremendous impact on faculty members’ academic careers. Fernando and Barrio Minton have criticized the bias and lack of fairness surrounding this system; however, this might inform the decision where scholars may seek to publish their academic work, either within a certain journal or other, or within a journal within a certain field or not (Hunter et al., 2018). Hunter and colleagues have expressed the potential consequences to professional identity and its relationship to program accreditation, as there is an implied obligation within Council for Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) accreditation guides to have Counselor Educators from CACREP-accredited program publish in Counselor Education-related journals. Further, some scholars have used journal metrics as a proxy to explain field differences, arguing the quality of one field in comparison to another based around impact factor differences found for their journals; others have discussed journal-based differences in fields due to number of issues and page counts across different journals (Hunter et al., 2018). Following this line of thinking, Hunter and colleagues have suggested that our field and journals need to consider alternative forms of impact. The politics surrounding journal-level impact is not something that we wish to explore in within this editorial; however, as I (KMG) move toward the end of my term as editor of JSGW, the issues surrounding impact, especially impact as it relates to our own journal (and other journals within our field of Counselor Education) is something that I believe needs further evaluation. Working in tandem with a doctoral student (DJVH), we wish to present a counter-narrative to what has been previously discussed within the field as a rationale for why many of our journals may have not yet received formal impact factors. As two individuals who were both trained in CACREP-accredited masters programs, and who have or are seeking doctoral degrees in CACREP-accredited doctoral programs, we come from within the field and seek a call for attention that we hope will lead to a call to action as we continue our important work in Counselor Education. It is ultimately our argument that the size of journals, the number of pages, or issues within journal volumes do not alone explain the lack of journal-level impact for many of the journals within our fields, as argued by others. Instead, it is our belief that there are actions that we could, and should, take as a field that would not only support us in moving our journals toward forma
正如其他学者(即Fernando & Minton, 2011;Hunter et al., 2018),期刊层面的影响(通常称为影响因子)是一个复杂的主题,对不同的利益相关者具有重要意义。期刊水平的影响已经被不同的学院和大学用来帮助告知他们如何评估教师的形成性和总结性评估过程(Barrio Minton & Fernando, 2011),这可能对教师的学术生涯产生巨大的影响。费尔南多和巴里奥·明顿批评了围绕这一制度的偏见和缺乏公平性;然而,这可能会为学者们决定在哪里发表他们的学术工作提供信息,无论是在某一期刊上还是其他期刊上,还是在某一领域的期刊上(Hunter et al., 2018)。亨特和他的同事们已经表达了职业身份及其与项目认证关系的潜在后果,因为在咨询和相关教育项目委员会(CACREP)认证指南中有一项隐含的义务,即来自CACREP认证项目的咨询教育工作者在咨询教育相关期刊上发表文章。此外,一些学者使用期刊指标作为解释领域差异的代理,认为一个领域的质量与另一个领域的质量相比是基于其期刊的影响因子差异;其他人则讨论了基于期刊的领域差异,这是由于不同期刊的问题数量和页数(Hunter et al., 2018)。按照这种思路,亨特和他的同事们建议我们的领域和期刊需要考虑其他形式的影响。围绕新闻层面影响的政治不是我们希望在这篇社论中探讨的;然而,随着我(KMG)作为JSGW编辑的任期即将结束,围绕影响的问题,特别是与我们自己的期刊(以及我们咨询师教育领域的其他期刊)相关的影响,我认为需要进一步评估。我们与一名博士生(DJVH)合作,希望对该领域之前讨论的问题提出一个相反的叙述,作为我们的许多期刊可能尚未收到正式影响因子的基本原理。作为两个都在cacrep认证的硕士课程中接受过培训的人,以及已经或正在攻读cacrep认证的博士学位的人,我们来自这个领域,希望能引起人们的关注,我们希望能在继续我们在咨询教育领域的重要工作时,引起人们的行动呼吁。我们最终的论点是,期刊的规模、页数或期刊卷内的问题并不能单独解释我们领域内许多期刊缺乏期刊级影响力的原因,正如其他人所认为的那样。相反,我们相信,作为一个领域,我们可以,也应该采取一些行动,这不仅会支持我们将期刊推向正式影响因子;它们还可以帮助我们确保我们领域的奖学金反映出我们希望为我们领域的长期未来维持的严谨性和影响形式。
{"title":"Impact: Will We Ever Have A Chance?","authors":"Kristopher M. Goodrich, David Van Horn","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2129939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129939","url":null,"abstract":"As noted by other scholars (i.e., Fernando & Minton, 2011; Hunter et al., 2018), journal-level impact (often referred to as impact factor) is a complex subject and has important meaning for different stakeholders. Journal level impact has been used by different colleges and universities to help inform how they evaluate faculty for formative and summative evaluation processes (Barrio Minton & Fernando, 2011), which can have a tremendous impact on faculty members’ academic careers. Fernando and Barrio Minton have criticized the bias and lack of fairness surrounding this system; however, this might inform the decision where scholars may seek to publish their academic work, either within a certain journal or other, or within a journal within a certain field or not (Hunter et al., 2018). Hunter and colleagues have expressed the potential consequences to professional identity and its relationship to program accreditation, as there is an implied obligation within Council for Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) accreditation guides to have Counselor Educators from CACREP-accredited program publish in Counselor Education-related journals. Further, some scholars have used journal metrics as a proxy to explain field differences, arguing the quality of one field in comparison to another based around impact factor differences found for their journals; others have discussed journal-based differences in fields due to number of issues and page counts across different journals (Hunter et al., 2018). Following this line of thinking, Hunter and colleagues have suggested that our field and journals need to consider alternative forms of impact. The politics surrounding journal-level impact is not something that we wish to explore in within this editorial; however, as I (KMG) move toward the end of my term as editor of JSGW, the issues surrounding impact, especially impact as it relates to our own journal (and other journals within our field of Counselor Education) is something that I believe needs further evaluation. Working in tandem with a doctoral student (DJVH), we wish to present a counter-narrative to what has been previously discussed within the field as a rationale for why many of our journals may have not yet received formal impact factors. As two individuals who were both trained in CACREP-accredited masters programs, and who have or are seeking doctoral degrees in CACREP-accredited doctoral programs, we come from within the field and seek a call for attention that we hope will lead to a call to action as we continue our important work in Counselor Education. It is ultimately our argument that the size of journals, the number of pages, or issues within journal volumes do not alone explain the lack of journal-level impact for many of the journals within our fields, as argued by others. Instead, it is our belief that there are actions that we could, and should, take as a field that would not only support us in moving our journals toward forma","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82884134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
How to Review for the Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW) Editorial Board Member Basics 如何为《小组工作专家期刊》(JSGW)编委会成员进行评审
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940
Kristopher M. Goodrich, Gerard T. Bartlett, Cassandra Hirdes, Lia D. Falco
Although peer review is the cornerstone of scientific and scholarly publication, very few people receive training to do this during their graduate education. The process of peer review involves having others of equal or greater expertise in a subject area critique or comment on work that is submitted to a journal. This process can be blind (i.e., the Associate or Action Editors know identity of the author(s) but the reviewers do not), or “double-blind” (i.e., the author identity is unknown to both the Action or Associate Editor and the reviewers). A manuscript that is peer reviewed is sometimes called “refereed.” The benefit of the process is that, when done well, it creates stronger, clearer publications which contribute to quality in the advancement of knowledge. Peer review is not meant to serve as a barrier to publication, rather it exists to ensure publications in professional journals are the best possible quality and can be disseminated worldwide. Further, none of this can be accomplished without other scholars and practitioners in the field who volunteer to perform this service. Serving as a member of a journal’s editorial review board is one of the most important roles that one can take in a professional association. Reviewers are an integral part of the publication process, supporting the journal in vetting and supporting authors to move manuscripts through the editorial process. Their work is key in ensuring that manuscripts are appropriate to the scope and mission of the journal (and the association it falls within), that the piece has the appropriate depth and breadth to add new knowledge into the field for practice and scholarly knowledge, as well as ensuring that authors write the work in a way that our broad group of readers may be able to understand and integrate the work into whatever their professional areas may be. It is surprising, then, that although we as a field recognize the importance that editorial board membership, and the process they engage in, that little is discussed or trained within graduate schools to prepare individuals to take on this important service. Often times, we find that our members are hesitant to take on these roles because of the little training or attention that editorial board service has previous had in their professional career. More often than not, we have found that most people we have interacted with have taken on these roles because they were “invited” by editorial or professional association leadership due to small review board numbers, and a need to fill slots. Others may feel external pressure to perform this service as a requirement for tenure and promotion. Additionally, these individuals often appear hesitant to take on these roles, due to the little training they have received. However, they do all report recognizing the importance of these roles, as well as an acknowledgment of the thing we often report to our authors: if you want to learn how to better write for a journal, join the
虽然同行评议是科学和学术出版的基石,但很少有人在研究生教育期间接受过这方面的培训。同行评议的过程包括让在某一学科领域具有同等或更高专业知识的其他人对提交给期刊的工作进行评论或评论。这个过程可以是盲目的(例如,助理编辑或行动编辑知道作者的身份,但审稿人不知道),或者是“双盲”的(例如,作者的身份对行动编辑或副编辑和审稿人都是未知的)。经过同行评审的手稿有时被称为“refered”。这个过程的好处是,如果做得好,它会创造出更强大、更清晰的出版物,从而有助于提高知识进步的质量。同行评议并不是要成为出版的障碍,而是为了确保专业期刊上的出版物具有尽可能高的质量,并能够在全世界传播。此外,如果没有该领域的其他学者和从业者自愿提供这项服务,这一切都不可能完成。作为期刊编辑评审委员会的成员是一个人在专业协会中可以担任的最重要的角色之一。审稿人是出版过程中不可或缺的一部分,支持期刊审查并支持作者将手稿通过编辑过程。他们的工作是确保手稿适合期刊的范围和使命(以及它所属的协会)的关键,这篇文章有适当的深度和广度,可以为实践和学术知识领域增加新的知识,以及确保作者以一种我们广泛的读者群体能够理解和整合工作的方式写作,无论他们的专业领域可能是什么。因此,令人惊讶的是,尽管我们作为一个领域认识到编委会成员的重要性,以及他们参与的过程,但在研究生院中,很少有人讨论或培训个人准备承担这项重要的服务。很多时候,我们发现我们的成员对担任这些角色犹豫不决,因为编辑委员会服务在他们的职业生涯中很少受到培训或关注。我们经常发现,我们接触过的大多数人之所以担任这些角色,是因为他们是被编辑或专业协会领导“邀请”的,因为审查委员会人数不多,而且需要填补空缺。其他人可能会感到外部压力,作为终身任职和晋升的必要条件而提供这项服务。此外,由于他们接受的培训很少,这些人往往表现得犹豫不决。然而,他们都承认这些角色的重要性,以及我们经常向作者报告的一件事:如果你想学习如何更好地为期刊写作,加入评审委员会(作为临时或正式的编辑委员会成员)。阅读他人手稿的过程,以及观察手稿通过系统的过程,可以揭开这个过程的神秘面纱,并使早期的职业学者成为更有效的作家和评论家。因此,《小组工作专家期刊2022》,第47卷,第3-4期,169-175 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940
{"title":"How to Review for the Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW) Editorial Board Member Basics","authors":"Kristopher M. Goodrich, Gerard T. Bartlett, Cassandra Hirdes, Lia D. Falco","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940","url":null,"abstract":"Although peer review is the cornerstone of scientific and scholarly publication, very few people receive training to do this during their graduate education. The process of peer review involves having others of equal or greater expertise in a subject area critique or comment on work that is submitted to a journal. This process can be blind (i.e., the Associate or Action Editors know identity of the author(s) but the reviewers do not), or “double-blind” (i.e., the author identity is unknown to both the Action or Associate Editor and the reviewers). A manuscript that is peer reviewed is sometimes called “refereed.” The benefit of the process is that, when done well, it creates stronger, clearer publications which contribute to quality in the advancement of knowledge. Peer review is not meant to serve as a barrier to publication, rather it exists to ensure publications in professional journals are the best possible quality and can be disseminated worldwide. Further, none of this can be accomplished without other scholars and practitioners in the field who volunteer to perform this service. Serving as a member of a journal’s editorial review board is one of the most important roles that one can take in a professional association. Reviewers are an integral part of the publication process, supporting the journal in vetting and supporting authors to move manuscripts through the editorial process. Their work is key in ensuring that manuscripts are appropriate to the scope and mission of the journal (and the association it falls within), that the piece has the appropriate depth and breadth to add new knowledge into the field for practice and scholarly knowledge, as well as ensuring that authors write the work in a way that our broad group of readers may be able to understand and integrate the work into whatever their professional areas may be. It is surprising, then, that although we as a field recognize the importance that editorial board membership, and the process they engage in, that little is discussed or trained within graduate schools to prepare individuals to take on this important service. Often times, we find that our members are hesitant to take on these roles because of the little training or attention that editorial board service has previous had in their professional career. More often than not, we have found that most people we have interacted with have taken on these roles because they were “invited” by editorial or professional association leadership due to small review board numbers, and a need to fill slots. Others may feel external pressure to perform this service as a requirement for tenure and promotion. Additionally, these individuals often appear hesitant to take on these roles, due to the little training they have received. However, they do all report recognizing the importance of these roles, as well as an acknowledgment of the thing we often report to our authors: if you want to learn how to better write for a journal, join the ","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89230659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dynamics of Co-Leadership Development in an Experiential Training Group 体验式培训团体中共同领导能力发展的动态
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2139876
Jordan Shannon, D. Seward, M. Luke
ABSTRACT Group co-leadership requires facilitators to effectively work together to produce positive group outcomes; however, there is a paucity of information about how the co-leadership relationship develops. In this modified consensual qualitative research study, we explore the development of the group co-leadership relationship in doctoral-level trainees. Five doctoral student co-leaders facilitating experiential learning groups completed reflection journals on their leadership experiences. Findings revealed five relational dynamic themes experienced amongst co-leaders in leading an experiential training group. The primary implications from these findings can assist counselor educators in the training of group leaders.
团队共同领导要求辅导员有效地协同工作以产生积极的团队成果;然而,关于共同领导关系如何发展的信息缺乏。在这个修正的共识性质的研究中,我们探讨了博士级学员群体共同领导关系的发展。五名促进体验式学习小组的博士生共同领导完成了关于他们领导经验的反思日志。研究结果揭示了共同领导在领导体验式培训小组中经历的五个关系动态主题。这些发现的主要意义可以帮助辅导员教育工作者培训团体领导者。
{"title":"Dynamics of Co-Leadership Development in an Experiential Training Group","authors":"Jordan Shannon, D. Seward, M. Luke","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2139876","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2139876","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Group co-leadership requires facilitators to effectively work together to produce positive group outcomes; however, there is a paucity of information about how the co-leadership relationship develops. In this modified consensual qualitative research study, we explore the development of the group co-leadership relationship in doctoral-level trainees. Five doctoral student co-leaders facilitating experiential learning groups completed reflection journals on their leadership experiences. Findings revealed five relational dynamic themes experienced amongst co-leaders in leading an experiential training group. The primary implications from these findings can assist counselor educators in the training of group leaders.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91167492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Group Work with LGBTQIA Youth Using Relational Cultural Theory: A Case Example 运用关系文化理论对LGBTQIA青年进行小组工作:一个个案
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2126050
Nathaniel L. Smith, Ian M. Lértora
ABSTRACT Group counseling is an effective counseling modality with LGBTQIA clients, yet much of group counseling literature does not account for the experience of prejudice and marginalization that LGBTQIA youth encounter. Relationships with families and peers of LGBTQIA youth have a significant impact and special consideration must be taken when designing and implementing group counseling. Consequently, we argue the use of Relational Cultural Theory (RCT) in a group context can bring discussions of controlling images, social inequities, and foster growth and relational resilience. We present a case example where the tenets of RCT are explored and provide implications for counselors.
团体咨询是一种有效的LGBTQIA咨询方式,然而很多团体咨询文献并没有考虑到LGBTQIA青少年遭遇的偏见和边缘化经历。LGBTQIA青年与家庭和同伴的关系对其有显著影响,在设计和实施团体咨询时必须特别考虑。因此,我们认为在群体背景下使用关系文化理论(RCT)可以带来关于控制形象、社会不平等的讨论,并促进成长和关系弹性。我们提出了一个案例,其中RCT的原则进行了探索,并为辅导员提供了启示。
{"title":"Group Work with LGBTQIA Youth Using Relational Cultural Theory: A Case Example","authors":"Nathaniel L. Smith, Ian M. Lértora","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2126050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2126050","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Group counseling is an effective counseling modality with LGBTQIA clients, yet much of group counseling literature does not account for the experience of prejudice and marginalization that LGBTQIA youth encounter. Relationships with families and peers of LGBTQIA youth have a significant impact and special consideration must be taken when designing and implementing group counseling. Consequently, we argue the use of Relational Cultural Theory (RCT) in a group context can bring discussions of controlling images, social inequities, and foster growth and relational resilience. We present a case example where the tenets of RCT are explored and provide implications for counselors.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84755263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiential Groups: Narratives of Latino Master’s Level Students in Counseling Psychology during the Covid-19 Pandemic 体验小组:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间咨询心理学拉丁裔硕士生的叙述
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2126049
Elizabeth Terrazas-Carrillo, Ediza Garcia, Alyssa Vera
ABSTRACT Experiential group training builds group counseling skills among counselors-in-training. The current study examines Latino master’s students’ perceptions of experiential group training that started in person but shifted to a virtual platform during the Covid-19 pandemic. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 Latino graduate counseling psychology students. Our findings included five main themes: Professional development, group leader modeling, personal growth, pandemic’s impact on experiential group and impact of culture on experiential group. Themes shed new insight for the use prior research findings on experiential group training and shed new insight the use of this training modality with Latinos and utilizing a virtual platform. Findings highlight multicultural competence among experiential group facilitators.
体验式团体培训旨在培养在训辅导员的团体咨询技能。目前的研究调查了拉丁裔硕士生对体验式小组培训的看法,这种培训从面对面开始,但在Covid-19大流行期间转向了虚拟平台。对11名拉丁裔咨询心理学研究生进行了定性访谈。我们的研究结果包括五个主要主题:专业发展、团队领导模型、个人成长、流行病对体验群体的影响以及文化对体验群体的影响。主题为使用先前关于体验式小组训练的研究结果提供了新的见解,并为拉丁美洲人使用这种训练方式和利用虚拟平台提供了新的见解。研究结果强调了经验小组促进者的多元文化能力。
{"title":"Experiential Groups: Narratives of Latino Master’s Level Students in Counseling Psychology during the Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Elizabeth Terrazas-Carrillo, Ediza Garcia, Alyssa Vera","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2126049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2126049","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Experiential group training builds group counseling skills among counselors-in-training. The current study examines Latino master’s students’ perceptions of experiential group training that started in person but shifted to a virtual platform during the Covid-19 pandemic. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 Latino graduate counseling psychology students. Our findings included five main themes: Professional development, group leader modeling, personal growth, pandemic’s impact on experiential group and impact of culture on experiential group. Themes shed new insight for the use prior research findings on experiential group training and shed new insight the use of this training modality with Latinos and utilizing a virtual platform. Findings highlight multicultural competence among experiential group facilitators.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83818551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Group Counseling Model Based on Bowen Family Systems Theory for College Students with Codependency in Taiwan 基于博文家庭系统理论的台湾大学生相互依赖群体咨询模式研究
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2022-06-03 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2080894
Shih-Hua Chang, C. Bhat
ABSTRACT In this practice article we present a group counseling model based on Bowen theory for college students with codependency traits and related symptoms developed and piloted in Taiwan. Along with principles of Bowen theory applied to the group counseling model, we discuss group goals, leader roles, group process and development. We present preliminary outcome data on differentiation of self and on therapeutic factors of the group and offer suggestions for future group practice and research.
摘要本研究旨在提出一种基于Bowen理论的团体心理辅导模式,针对台湾地区有相互依赖特质及相关症状的大学生。将Bowen理论的原理应用到团体咨询模型中,我们讨论了团体目标、领导角色、团体过程和发展。我们提出了自我分化和群体治疗因素的初步结果数据,并对未来的群体实践和研究提出了建议。
{"title":"A Group Counseling Model Based on Bowen Family Systems Theory for College Students with Codependency in Taiwan","authors":"Shih-Hua Chang, C. Bhat","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2080894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2080894","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this practice article we present a group counseling model based on Bowen theory for college students with codependency traits and related symptoms developed and piloted in Taiwan. Along with principles of Bowen theory applied to the group counseling model, we discuss group goals, leader roles, group process and development. We present preliminary outcome data on differentiation of self and on therapeutic factors of the group and offer suggestions for future group practice and research.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77838483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A CQR Study of the Fishing for Wellness Nature-Based Group Intervention for Adults Facing Adversity 基于自然的成人逆境群体干预钓鱼健康的CQR研究
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2022.2058663
Ryan F. Reese, Melisa DeMeyer, Amy Hoag, L. Glass, Chris Madigan, Janeé R. Avent Harris
ABSTRACT We examined participant experiences of the 7-week Fishing for Wellness (FFW) nature-based group counseling protocol. Eleven white adult male and female clients aged 27–73 years (M = 47.8, SD = 14.3) completed semi-structured interviews in exploring contextual factors impacting participation, self-reported change, and possible elements within FFW contributing to that change. Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research. Participants reported expanded self-awareness, self-efficacy, connection with self and others, and nature relatedness two to three months following the group’s termination. Findings lend initial support for applying the FFW protocol when working with clients presenting with adverse life experiences.
摘要:我们研究了为期7周的钓鱼健康(FFW)基于自然的团体咨询方案的参与者体验。11名年龄在27-73岁之间的白人成年男性和女性客户(M = 47.8, SD = 14.3)完成了半结构化访谈,以探索影响参与的背景因素、自我报告的变化以及FFW中可能导致这种变化的因素。数据分析采用共识定性研究。在小组结束后的两到三个月,参与者报告了自我意识、自我效能、与自我和他人的联系以及自然关系的扩大。研究结果为在治疗有不良生活经历的患者时应用FFW方案提供了初步支持。
{"title":"A CQR Study of the Fishing for Wellness Nature-Based Group Intervention for Adults Facing Adversity","authors":"Ryan F. Reese, Melisa DeMeyer, Amy Hoag, L. Glass, Chris Madigan, Janeé R. Avent Harris","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2058663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2058663","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We examined participant experiences of the 7-week Fishing for Wellness (FFW) nature-based group counseling protocol. Eleven white adult male and female clients aged 27–73 years (M = 47.8, SD = 14.3) completed semi-structured interviews in exploring contextual factors impacting participation, self-reported change, and possible elements within FFW contributing to that change. Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research. Participants reported expanded self-awareness, self-efficacy, connection with self and others, and nature relatedness two to three months following the group’s termination. Findings lend initial support for applying the FFW protocol when working with clients presenting with adverse life experiences.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73853573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal for Specialists in Group Work
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1